and, yes, things are dark right now, and ruth bader ginsburg can't save us.cceptance? forget that, i'm not accepting shit. we need to fight like hell. [rock music] i know what you need to do. you know what we all need to do. - vote. - vote. - uh, vote. - vote. - boat. - vote. - vo-- - no, no, no, guys. i mean--yes, you definitely have to vote. go vote, but, also, we should be thinking long-game. just like rbg herself said, real change, enduring change happens one step at a time. so no matter what happens on november 3rd, we have to keep fighting for change. here are a few organizations that you can get involved with to do that. there's the aclu women's rights project founded by ginsburg herself. or, how about, "she should run"? it's a non-profit that encourages more women to run for public office. there's equal justice works, which funds young lawyers to work on public interest projects, and "ms. jd," which inspires and supports women to pursue legal professions. they're basically funding the rbgs of tomorrow. and, most importantly, keep fighting. thank you,

them over the last, you know, 20, 30 years, imagine if conservative activists showed up at ruth bader ginsburg's apartment at the water gate screaming nasty things of her accusing things at her or maybe at alaina kagan's place. they would be called domestic

we hear ruth bader ginsburg ensco leah often enjoyed opera. how can we have that same relationship between congress and the general population? >> i am just worried about keeping it at the court right now. [laughter] this is not the court. i sat with ruth bader ginsburg and she was a good colleague for me. you knew where she was dealing with. sometimes they would forget their agitated. the 11th there was a fabulous court. the last four appointees of the courts, include the newest ones. >> i am available, by the way. [laughter] >> you have some confirmations. [laughter] you know you do. [laughter] i think, that general attitude is your future on the bench. you need to be concerned about that. we never had that before. we may have been a dysfunctional family, but we were a family. you trusted each other, laughed with each other, went to lunch with each other. >> what has changed? what has changed between that court and the current one? >> what has changed in society, attitudes have changed. when i got to the court, he still had world war ii vete

among them, ruth bader ginsburg. but among that, it first violated historical guidelines for what doctors should and shouldn't do. it is actually an ethical decision regarding medicine. >> reporter: here in the bay area, san mateo republican party sums up the feelings of a lot of her members did >> for a long time, i think there has been too much freedom on abortion. i think that is the general consensus. it really is not a matter up -- this is my body and my choice. there is life involved, and i think people have forgotten that. >> reporter: those who have like to see an end to roe v wade thinks it might be on the horizon. they know that anything can happen with an issue this highly charged in the east bay, john ramos. kpix. 5. >>> a very unusual protest captured -- the guy calling himself spidey pro-life landed himself in handcuffs after scaling the sales force tower. the man did not appear to have any safety equipment attached to him. the 22-year-old from las vegas was cited and released. ridiculous take you live

i'm matt pieper, cbs news, new york. >>> ruth bader ginsburg's love of opera translated into some bigor the washington national opera. an online auction of some 150 possessions of the late supreme court justice raised more than $800,000 for the opera. ginsburg's tea set and coat were among the items up for bid, but the big-ticket item was this drawing which sold for $55,000. it first appeared in a 2015 article about ginsburg in "the new york times." >>> up next, a surprise in the outfield. a special guest makes an unannounced appearance at last night's mets/nationals game. your shipping manager left to “find themself.” leaving you lost. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire why burn a candle when you can switch matching your job description. to air wick essential mist? it's the modern way to transform fragrance infused with natural essential oils into a mist. air wick essential mist. connect to nature. introducing the all-new gillettelabs with exfoliating bar. it c

we hear about scalia, ruth bader ginsburg the best of friends although ideologically on the oppositeide. whoever leaked this we have to find out who the person is and charge them with a crime. i don't know what the crime would be whether it's some kind of fraud on government property. i heard there is a statute fraud on a government that could improve this kind of act. but i will tell you what is so interesting about this is if they want to gin up the left who was in for alleged bloodbath in november by republicans, there is no better way to do it than with roe v. wade. if you will just indulge me for a minute. i read the decision at length the dobbs decision as well as roe again. roe they say is an exercise of raw judicial power. in other words, it is a supreme court acting as lengths legislative body. understand if this decision is ultimately the decision of the court, it doesn't outlaw abortion. all it says is we are saying it's not a constitutional right. congress can pass a law, so chuck schumer so fired up, pass a law, chuck. every state can pass its own law. they can -- negate

ruth bader ginsburg argued that roe v. wade was fatally flawed when the seven men in 1973 handed it down. this decision, this draft decision that we were combing through last night shows that this decision of abortion will be sent back to states where it was before 1973, where states, legislators and voters, which by the way 8 of 10 of gen z say they want a voice in the vote on abortion policies in their states. it won't be up to seven individuals on the supreme court anymore to make the law of the land which, by the way, is not the role of the judiciary in our country. i would really like to see -- i watched the congresswoman's remarks and i was fascinated with her story, very saddened by her story. i would like to see msnbc bring on a guest, a friend of mine who was conceived out of rape, who was actually created of sexual assault. so often we hear this argument within the abortion movement that somehow we need to justify 100% of abortions for 1% of abortions. that's not the case. when you ask young people, ask americans

back with me is justice ruth bader ginsburg's law clerk.s came from inside the building. that's what all the experts are saying. that'ssuggested in the way they framed it. they first reported it last night. assuming it's not from one of the justices that we are talking about a clerk or others who are involved in circulating drafts, how does this change the relationships and the whole traditions of clerks being such trusted advisors, legal counselors, more than just an assistant? >> andrea, i don't think that it came from a clerk. i have a hard time believing that. for two reasons. i think clerks who go to the supreme court have tremendous respect for the court and for the workings of the court, the deliberation process, that the drafting and redrafting of opinions. so i don't see a clerk doing something like this. second, that was a february draft. it's now may. presumably, there have been many other edited rewrites of that draft. if it were a clerk, you would assume you would see a later version. that said, i have no idea how this go out.

republicans then turned around and rushed the confirmation of justice amy barrett after the death of ruth bader ginsburg even though voting began in the 2021 elections. a recent poll of "the washington post" and abs showed that -- abc showed that 70% of americans say that the supreme court should uphold roe. now more than ever it's essential for the senate to pass the women's health protection act. the legislation would protect the right to abortion, free from medically unnecessary restrictions, and create a statutory right for providers to provide and patients to receive care. this would codify roe v. wade and prevent states from continuing to enact restrictions on reproductive freedoms. despite the opinion just being a draft and abortion still being a constitutional right, states are already seizing on the momentum of this draft opinion and moving to limit women's constitutional rights. since the leak of this draft opinion, legislatures around the country are rushing to criminalize abortion. just last week a louisiana legislature would classify abortion as homicide. half of our states have already pas

was it ruth bader ginsburg, kim kardashian or lady gaga? >> i'm betting with my heart on this one. dy: roll the tape. >> i don't think women need . kennedy: no one got it. ruth bader ginsburg? [laughter] kennedy: god bless her soul. [laughter] i want to smell like us like to be totally honest with you. >> i just found out now that we don't go anywhere. kennedy: this one is worth to. which goonies said we need to invent technology that's never even been invented yet? kamala harris, victoria's secret model or aoc? we need to invent technology that's never been invented yet. >> i'm doing this and i think you are, that means spirit. kennedy: roll the tape. >> we need to rebuild schools, invent technology that's never even been invented yet. [laughter] kennedy: alexandria, you and jessica split the wind. your hand in hand going to kamala harris' next speech. [laughter] >> i was already going so i want another gift. kennedy: i'll give you the new lady gaga perfume. >> i already make of myself. kennedy: you are all incredible. >> i like it. kennedy: i'll let the powers of be no and get you

we hear about ruth bader ginsburg and scully i had a great relationship. how can we foster that same relationship in congress and the general population? >> i'm just worried about keeping it out the court now. [laughter] >> she was actually an easy colleague for me. you knew where she was and she was a nice person to deal with but it was the court that was together 11 years was a fabulous court. it was one you looked forward to being a part of. you've got to be concerned about just like you see the law clerks remember the last four appointees of the courts including the newest one i knew as law clerks, these clerks -- >> i'm available by the way. anybody who would have an attitude to leak documents, that you need to be concerned about that. we never had that before. we may have to been dysfunctional but we were family and you loved it. you trusted each other and laughed together, went to lunch together every day and i can only hope you keep it, was at ben franklin that said if you can keep it. >> to follow up briefly, what has changed between that court an

turned around and rushed the confirmation of justice amy coney barrett at the death of justice ruth bader ginsburg or even the early voting has begun and the 2020 presidential elections. overturning roe goes against public opinion. a recent poll of the washington post-abc showed 70% of americans believed that the court should uphold t roe and that decision regarding abortions should be left to a woman and her doctor. now more than ever it is essential for the senate to pass the women's health protection act which i am proud to be a cosponsor. the legislation would protect the right to abortion free from medically unnecessarynn restrictions and create a statutory right for providers to provide and patients to receive care. this would codify roe v. wade and prevent states from continuing to act restrictions on reproductive freedoms. despite the opinion just being a draft and abortion sylvain constitutional right, states already seizing on the momentum of this draft opinion and moving to limit a woman's constitutional rights. since the leak of this draft opinion, legislatures around the country are r

>> that's right, so donations poured in with the democrat party just as ruth bader ginsburg passed away after the draft decision was like yesterday there was actually sort of a paltry donation so maybe this attempted seizure is not actually working in the fact that people feel a certain way about this hotly contested issue. >> right there was a bit of a pop but it's not quite what they were expecting. i think the issue here is they don't want to give the issue to the people to decide. they are afraid they're not gonna -- listen, there are plenty of republicans that live in blue states that deal with the decisions that those around them make. so tax and spend and soft on crime and all of those things. this republicans have a choice. many of left and they feel like they are more in line with their morals and values. if somebody's living in the state that wants to put more of a restriction this is not an opinion that's going to undo abortion in this country. states may put more restrictions on it, but people have the right to leave. they can go live somewhere else where it's more of a free

i would say go back to ruth bader ginsburg again. of her critiques of roe, her problem of it in part was that it halted a process that was moving in and informed direction and thereby deferred stable settlement on the issue. her point -- the left cites various poles, leave it to the states by the state will end up in the right logical place but i maintain that we are not in abortion nation. the poll shows 56% of americans do not want abortion and the second trimester, that's 12 weeks thereafter, the mississippi lies at 15 weeks, an 80 percent do not want it in the third trimester. that's the opinion of the majority of americans. so rather than using this buzzword, they think everybody is at the side of roe, lets it with the state land. >> for our president sang the this draft opinion represents a radical notion -- to me the radical notion as the left advocating for taking the waste, stripping the power away from the people. that is the fundamental tenet of this country was built on. it was our independence and the power of the people

i want to ask you about your former boss, justice ruth bader ginsburg. she is obviously a proponent of abortion rights. what do you think she would be making of this moment, if she were still with us. >> i think it would be -- she would be somewhere between heartbroken and infuriated. she really spent her entire career as a young advocate establishing gender equality before the supreme court. she has a -- this is a decision that will really hurt women's equality in our country. she has a very different constitutional philosophy, obviously, then justice alito does. where he really looks back to history when interpreting the constitution and what did that text mean at the time, she sees these concepts, concepts of liberty and equality, as ones that have all of overtime. >> let me ask you a quick follow-up -- >> we were not even people back then. >> let me get a quick follow-up on the. do you think in retrospect that she made a mistake not retiring in 2013, when there was a lot of pressure on her to do so because it would have meant that a democratic presid

i will speak with a former clerk for justice ruth bader ginsburg about what that world could look likeanuary six commission. why that panel could get another contempt charge ready for him. him. him. wow, first time? check out this backpack i made for marco. oh yeah? well, check out this tux. oh, nice. that'll go perfect with these. dude... those are so fire. [whines] only pay for what you need. ♪liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty.♪ looking to get back in your type 2 diabetes zone? once-weekly ozempic® can help. ♪ oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! ♪ ♪ oh, oh, oh ♪ ozempic® is proven to lower a1c. most people who took ozempic® reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. and you may lose weight. adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. in adults also with known heart disease, ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. ozempic® helped me get back in my type 2 diabetes zone. ozempic® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't share needles or pens, or reuse needles. don't take ozempic® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have m

and someone said if actually we had an all-women group chat late at night inspired by ruth bader ginsburg who always stood strong and recommended to act virtuously, then our world would be a better place. so thank you again. >> thank you. and last but not least and she couldn't join us here today, i wanted to honor susie tompkins buhl. she's really been an extraordinary person in san francisco. a person who supports and uplifts and pushes women in office. she's supported programs like emerge. she is really when it comes to getting women elected. she does what's near and dear to her heart is the environment and making sure this is a better place we leave for our children. i'm proud of san francisco and its focus on equity and our plans around our new environmental climate action plan. they are the professionals and they should decide what happens around san francisco. it centered around making sure that communities that have been disenfranchised like the bayview hunter's point and i know we have some women here today that they are at the forefront of the change we need to make in san franc

since then with nominees and republican candidates alike ruth bader ginsburg was the first to say -- this haebs capsified by the sort of opaque language that prevents having frank and full conversations about what peoples positions are. about litmus tests insofar as democrats only appointed pro-candidates and then trump joined into that process. i think at the end of the day the american people are very ambivalent about abortion. they generally don't like it. but at the same time they want some protections for it and some circumstances, and we're going to actually see that in most of the country is that you're going to find these kinds of compromises which is something that ruth bader ginsburg herself said would have been better -- >> just real quick, i agree with jonah. what i meant was on the republican side, republican presidents. i mean, that was maybe going back to the suitor example where republicans were very upset with george h.w. bush, but more recently look at the clip you played from justice alito, then nominee alito as a george w. bush nominee. he was saying all the right

wade, and we also know very well justice thomas, this court is not like that of ruth bader ginsburg,, cnn legal analyst joins me now. joan, i'm glad you're here. you've written my abook on the supreme court and know this well. is justice thomas right about the court of yesteryear and the sort of kumbaya moments that were there? >> well, i can say that justice thomas and others from that era had a higher level of trust. he said what has been simmering inside for many years, and i think it's telling that it would come out at this point. two things, and they're both in the clips that you played, laura. first of all, when he said, we actually trusted each other, as in, now we don't. and the more recent clip you just played about ruth bader ginsburg when he said, you knew where she was. she told us how she felt, how she was going to rule. and the implication is -- and i know this is the case behind the scenes -- as they regard the chief as secretive and cagey, but it has been toward an end that has made john roberts successful in other times in brokering a compromise. just think, laura, o

wade was first decided despite warnings from even supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg that unless congress voted into law there was a chance roe v. wade being overturned to we will look at the political impact as well. >> stay with us for developing some of the abortion-rights fights. we have you covered on air and online at kpix.com and streaming on cbs news bay area. >>> no relief today on the stock market. more red although nowhere close to the huge truck we saw yesterday the the dow closed out about 90 points but it was down by the hundreds earlier in the day. the nasdaq lost 173 and the s&p fell by 23. the latest numbers show the job market in the u.s. is staying strong but there is uncertainty about how much longer that will last. overall the economy added 428,000 jobs in april and that is the 12 straight month of at least 400,000 . the unappointed rate stayed at 3.6% and 20 oppositions are open. the latest data shows 11.5 million job openings in the u.s. right now but the federal reserve raises interest rates to slow down inflation. wall street is getting nervous about the

you quoted ruth bader ginsburg saying as much and she certainly agrees that abortion should be legal. right. what is happening here is we are holding democracy accountable for forty nine years we haven't'tor been able to have a real debatet and i think this is significant. it's often about whether or nott the supreme court should be legalizing abortionio in some way.y.indi now it'svi aboutdu whetheral sta your individual state and whether you want to support people on either side of the aisle. that's what should be happening here. this this is democracy flourishing. this is judicial restraint. i this is the opposite of judicial activism. would this is a democracy in action. you t would think the democrats remember showing it wasn't too long ago in the supreme courtit they stood up and said every single american has to get a covid shot or you lose your job. w now they don't want for democracy to workant democ on ts issue. it doesn't add up. all right. i alwayst' good to see you. thank you . by the way, congrats on the new book about that soon as well. amazon.com.. thank you . its new b

influence at all of justice roberts in this because the bench has changed with the loss of ruth bader ginsburgnd gain of amy connie barrett, he is no longer the swing vote in the middle. he is in the left of a majority right court. yamiche: what does this leak decision, especially with john roberts calling it a breach of trust of the court, signal about the overall health of the supreme court? abby: the supreme court is driven by a lot of political divides. ere is no going away from that at this point i think. the court has been tainted by a political process involving putting the justices on the court in the first place. now what we are seeing with the leak, though we don'know about where it came from, is that someone within the court, which is known for its secrecy, is trying to influence that process by leaking. i think that tells us a lot about how the court sees itself and the role that it plays in american society. no matter which side it came from, there was an attempt to, as julia put it, to disrupt the deliberative process. that disruption was intentional. i'm not sure whoever did thi

interestingly, ruth bader ginsburg was very candid about her beliefs about roe v. wade. some people agreed with her and some people did not. but, she made it clear what she thought. and i think at least three of the justices misled the senate. senator collins certainly has made it known that she felt misled as well as senator murkowski. you make a really good point that we need to have a check on what these people are saying when they show up and they raise their hand and take an oath. host: the other big story besides the vote in the senate was the information on inflation in this country. inflation hit 8.3% last month, compared to one year ago. the headlines from the washington times today, biden looks powerless in the inflation blame game. what can be done despite inflation? guest: well, everybody wants to fight inflation. let's be clear about that. i think the president is at the top of the list. so, what he is doing is he is relying on the federal reserve, which generally is the body that tries to regulate our economy. they only have certain tools to do that. we are

ruth bader ginsburg told me we need to start over. susan: this is going to be not understandable.hat is the issue? david: the time limit has expired, 38 states may have ratified, so that is a constitutional question. five states have rescinded their votes. susan: why does this fall in your lap? david: the national archives certifies the amendment process. it reports when all of the votes are in. susan: going to go back to exhibits and get you out of the legal controversies. you are a vietnam veteran. why did you feel it was important for this story to be told? david: coming up on the 50th anniversary of the war and we have such important material recently declassified, and i have just read a terrific book written by a vietnamese person whose family survived vietnam. the more we get away from it, the less we remember. i wanted to make sure those memories and those truths were captioned. susan: did working on that change the way you processed that? david: i think so. it was a controversial exhibit. controversial to funders, staff, i am proud of the fact we were able to create someth

library that t i learned for the first time about the work of thurgood marshall and the work of ruth bader ginsburg5 years ago i resolve to become a lawyer just like them and change the stories our country chose to tell in the courtrooms and laws in books. neither that day nor that conviction has left me. but the they are etched into my being in my heart mourns from the red fern grows and to the silliness of the wayside school and then a wrinkle in time. the most of all the honor of having found books that reflected me at a time when i needed them gave me a sense of perhaps, despite all messaging, start singularly unwanted. that perhaps i wasass just as r the as the next child. to this day, whenever i feel scared and lost there a few things more comforting than the sight and smell of books here the book festival at 9:00 a.m. on a saturday. [laughter] i suspect you can relate. so now that you know a little that about me, i think it may be safe for me to share a confession. i'm actually not that different from jerry. sometime over the winter in the fifth grade in 1998 i also had a missing overdue boo

i don't think anybody much less ruth bader ginsburg would form this type of protest.ting. i encourage catholics and people of faith across the country to go to church tomorrow and see the largest mother's day turnout at church in the history of the united states. these protesters will be greeted by thousands of worshipers there to celebrate life, celebrating their mothers and thanking god for their mothers, protesters want to celebrate death, they want to abort children and that is what the president called it, called them children, terminate the lives of children, let them protest. let's have the churches full of parishioners celebrating life tomorrow and that is great and it will be a great demonstration to show a handful of people trying to disrupt a service with thousands of people in their seats praising god and thanking god for their mothers so bring it on. rachel: such a great point even the protesters thank their mothers for choosing life, it is an excellent point. talk about how much the feminist movement can't even say woman, they say birthing person, is the

and someone said if actually we had an all-women group chat late at night inspired by ruth bader ginsburg who always stood strong and recommended to act virtuously, then our world would be a better place. so thank you again. >> thank you. and last but not least and she couldn't join us here today, i wanted to honor susie tompkins buhl. she's really been an extraordinary person in san francisco. a person who supports and uplifts and pushes women in office. she's supported programs like emerge. she is really when it comes to getting women elected. she does what's near and dear to her heart is the environment and making sure this is a better place we leave for our children. i'm proud of san francisco and its focus on equity and our plans around our new environmental climate action plan. they are the professionals and they should decide what happens around san francisco. it centered around making sure that communities that have been disenfranchised like the bayview hunter's point and i know we have some women here today that they are at the forefront of the change we need to make in san franc

through the library that i learned for the first time about the work of thurgood marshall and ruth bader ginsburg. and it was then in there some 25 years ago. that i resolved to become a lawyer just like them and change the stories our country chose to tell. in its courtrooms and its laws in its books neither that day nor that conviction has left me. for the treasures of the books that i discovered are etched into my being. my heart still mourns little ann and old dan from where the wet red. fern grows still delights in the silliness the wayside school. still steals itself with the feminism of a wrinkle in time. but most of all the honor of having found books that reflected me at a time when i needed them gave me a sense that perhaps despite all messaging. i was not singularly unwanted that perhaps i was just as worthy as the next child. to this day whenever i feel scared and lost there are a few things more comforting than the sight and smell of books. and because you are here at a book festival at 9 am on a saturday. i suspect you can relate. so now that you know a little bit about me. i think

mark: ruth bader ginsburg said virtually the same thing in 1992. let me ask you about. yes or no. law? >> no. >> was plessies for ferguson good law. >> no. >> slavery. did not commit any offendses. three supreme court decisions, overturned. >> correct. infamous decisions that took the court a long time to correct, but at least the court did it. and in one of the footnotes in draft opinion, justice alito points to 25 cases. where the court has overruled its prior precedent and over 150 such examples, the court of has a duty to get it right, and overrule that which it believe its wrong. >> in argument that roe has been in place for 49 years, is not that effective is roe is not constitutionally based. supreme court decision in my view is not modest. they didn't take a position, they said, hands off. somehow that is a radical decision attacking women's right, every woman in america, having her rights attacked. what do you make of that. >> there is a terrible distortion of what the draft opinions says, it is a restoration, saying we were wrong in roe v. wade taking the calderon out of

the activists are calling themselves ruth cinema as a nod to ruth bader ginsburg. was seen as a pioneer for women's rights also the agility of the law. in jen psaki seem to support the protest as long as they are peaceful. >> those who have young kids, their neighbors are not all public figures so with the president think about waving off activists to go into residential neighborhoods of virginia and maryland? >> peter, i think our view here is a peaceful protest and one history in the united states. we encourage people to keep it peaceful and not resort to any level of violence. >> so as far as the next step, the majority leader chuck schumer promised today to force a vote on legislation that would codify a woman's rights to seek abortion into federal law. however, it is not expected to reach the 60 votes. threshold, kevin back to you. >> kevin: video tonight of october speech by the new disinformation is our nina janco bids dismissing parental concerns about critical race theory saying the issue was the g.o.p. weaponizing people's emotions. >> critical race theor

as if ruth bader ginsburg sent them who released personal addresses of six supreme court justices yesterdayth a little encouragement from their favorite native american senator liz warren to rally her pro-abortion crowd last night. the united states supreme court thinks they can impose their extremist views on all of the women of this country. they are wrong. this is what republicans have been fighting for decades now. we are going to fight back. >> then pocahontas said the only way she knows how with classic pro-abortion pow wow. >> i have seen the world -- [ indiscernible ] we are not going back. [ applause ] not ever. we are not going back. not ever! not ever! >> these are the people that we should be worried about. the ones in the streets telling people to fight back against so called extremist supreme court. all for wanting to return the question of abortion to the states to the people, to the elected legislatures. the ones lying in the face of their supporters to incite a phony uproar. most of them are convinced that republicans can flat out ban abortion in the country if roe v. wade

statues depicting ruth bader ginsburg are set to be depicted.e hopes to spark conversations in the next generation. >> millions will walk by here. and we hope that they have this when they give so many to get how they are. >> two years to put the plan in place and hire an artist. >>> aaron harrison is passenger on the plane. you know flying experience. the pilot suffered a medical emergency and could no longer fly the plane. he miraculously landed the plane safely of florida airport. this story caught the world's attention. harrison is now speaking out about his experience. only with savannah guthrie. >> reporter: everyone is amazed at how calm you where. did you feel calm? >> someone asked me what i thought my heart rate was. and i said it was probably in the 90s. and they said what about after it was over? and i said probably about 160. so about every time i stop focusing that's when it hit me. i knew it was a life or death situation. you do what you have to do to control the situation or you're going to die and that's what i did. >> watch the

a group called ruth, in honor of ruth bader ginsburg, hosted the home address of every supreme court because they are conservative. to invite violence and harassment committed get them to change their votes. then ruth sent this to practicing catholics across the country. "stuff your rosaries enter weaponized prayer, we will be burning the eucharist to show her disgust for the abused catholic churches that have been condoned for centuries. you'd think the biden administration might have to say about that. intimidating judges by the way is a federal crime. but you know, the biden administration did not try to stop this, they did nothing. in fact, from her podium at the white house, the president's publicist endorsed the coming harassment very clearly. "the president's view is that there's a lot of passion, a lot of fear, a lot of sadness for many, many people, jen psaki explained. it could not of been clear. go for it and terrorized by that is the word from the lighthouse. that is exactly what they did. this is outside brett kavanaugh's house. ♪ ♪ [indistinct] >> tucker: brett kavanaugh

i hadn't realized "ruth sent us" was because of ruth bader ginsburg, even ruth bader ginsburg agreedoe was not grounded in solid. it was vulnerable from the beginning. roe v. wade has been the sick and twisted core of left wing ideology for a long time. you knew this kind of freakout was coming. it's just not going to poem's homes. people's homes. i go to your home sometimes. >> brian: and protest me. >> pete: that's because we are frenemies. in this case they don't know these people and they are showing up. >> rachel: it might not change the outcome in this. it does a lot to degrade our system. when i heard that there were -- you know, threats, potential threats, threatening actions outside of the homes of judges, sounds super third world. go to latin america it happens all the time. judges actually get killed. and as you spoke to it earlier, brian, people go, i'm not going to take that job it's dangerous to my family. not worth it. >> brian: talk to sarah huckabee sanders. told she can't go to certain restaurants. nobody going outside the trump hotel for dinner when they wanted to

them over the last, you know, 20, 30 years, imagine if conservative activists showed up at ruth bader ginsburg'spartment at the water gate screaming nasty things of her accusing things at her or maybe at alaina kagan's place. they would be called domestic terrorists warned by the doj and investigated by the fbi. kind of like the upset parents who attended school board meetings. >> it responds the concerns about violence, threats of violence, other criminal conduct. that's all it's about. and all it asks is for federal law enforcement to consult with, meet with local law enforcement to assess the circumstances, strategize about what may or may not be necessary, provide federal assistance if it is necessary. >> laura: the statement they put out specifically referenced school boards and school officials. it's terrible for america to have one of its two political parties so hooked on radicalists. the inmates are truly running the democrat asylum and that's the angle. but it got worse than protests outside the home joining me now is tracy spokeswoman for heal without harm at the madison office bombed

the day after justice ruth get ruth bader ginsburg. 9 million.as senator tom coughlin that's one barometer that may be the emotion can't override the cold, hard fact of what's happening to the family budget you've been on capitol hill, you've witnessed the emotional turmoil that they're trying to create will this work? >> no it won't. you're looking for any harbor in the storm because they can see how unpopular joe biden of the democratic agenda is. first are saying that this can motivate so many of their far left competitors but what do they think it will do to millions, and millions of devout pro-life activists who have toiled in the vineyards for years to protect innocent unborn children, to finally see the fruits of their labor. our voters and to be galvanized this fall for this opinion is impact the final decision of the court. second, to all those people who aren't activists on the issue where they think it's gonna do when they see just how strained democrats have become, supporting late term, partial birth abortions and practices. and then

the pro-choice called ruth, named after the late liberal ruth bader ginsburg, the group also calling on women across the country to lead peaceful protests. back out here live in manhattan, i can tell you churches across the country and not just in new york city are prepared for the threat but talking with nypd, aishah, they say they are prepared but they haven't seen any big protests happening just yet. aishah: we will keep an eye on it. eric: aishah, the supreme court leak is raising safety concerns of homes of justices after activists posted addresses online. you see the security fence that's put up around the high court in washington. that comes as pro-choice protestors march to the homes of two justices last night. meantime president biden who calls the provisional court opinion, quote, radical, is meeting virtually with g7 leaders on the ongoing war in ukraine. lucas tomlinson with the very latest on all of this, hi, lucas. lucas: ten crews spoke to maria bartiromo but the white house handling of the protest outsidee the homes of supreme court justices. >> it was shameful that t

black robes, if you will basically imposing policy choice on the entire country that even ruth bader ginsburg's office was not appropriate. the two mark, still a big gift because we don't know, roe vs. wade if it is overturned, that means each state would get to decide their own abortion laws. but then you hear people like senator bernie sanders. so, what if congress does move to codify roe vs. wade on the federal level? then you have the federal government saying one thing. the state saying something else. then what happens? >> if there is a conflict between federal law and state law, the constitution addresses this with what is known as the supremacy clause with a conflict between federal law and state welcome within federal law controls. of course, realistically come i don't know how realistic it is that you can have any kind of major national legislation involving abortion given the current situation in washington. if that were to occur, the federal law would trump unique and consistent state laws. >> yeah, i completely agree with you there. calls to filibuster that we have gone down that r

mark: ruth bader ginsburg said the same thing in 1992, when interviewed for columbia law review.>> no. >> was plessy versus ferguson good law. >> no. >> >> no slavery, segregation, and internment of japanese americans, inconfident, 3 supreme court decisions. all of which have been overturned. >> that is correct. infamous decisions that took the court a long time to correct, but at least the court evenly did it and in one of footnotes in draft opinion, justice alito points to 25 cases where the court has overruled the prior precedent and there are over 150 examples. the court has a duty to get it right. and to overrule that which it believes it wrong. mark: an argument that roe has been in place for 49 years. an that effective if it is not constitutionaly based. the supreme court decision in my view this modest, they didn't take a position, they said, that is not our job, there is nothing in federal constitution, they said, hands off. and somehow that is a radical decision to attack women's right, every woman in america is having her right attack. >> there has been a terrible dist

you had people attacking the cars of all the justices including ruth bader ginsburg and justice kagan. so there's a pattern of threatening to attack the court if things don't go the way democratic senators want threats to do any number of things so it's part of a pattern that you've seen on the left which you don't see on the right and i think that's why many people assume this is yet another attempt to bully justices away from this description. >> laura: now megan, former us attorney for the southern district of new york went on this rant today. >> not too great a stretch to say there's some connection between an effort to overturn an election and an effort to overturn roe and it's this as i've been thinking about it. there is a a spectrum of the ideological spectrum who thinks it has certain kinds of powers and want to engage in radical efforts to overturn things that they don't like. there's no more incrementalism, no more compromised. you don't like the results of an election you storm the capitol and talk about hanging the vice-president of the united states and you get the presi

ruth sent us, it is a left wing group named after justice ruth bader ginsburg, and honor to ruth bader ginsburg, and this group is specifically encouraging people to go to the homes of the supreme court justices in virginia and maryland specifically those conservative justices. a statement from ruth sent us said our 6-3 extremist supreme court routinely issues rulings that hurt women, racial minorities, lgbtq+, and immigrant rights. rise up using a diversity of tactics. >> people have become addicted to rage. this is gratuitous, it's not going to be an alteration of the opinion. if anything, justices feel they have to stand their ground with even greater certainty. >> there's a lot of passion, a lot of fear, a lot of sadness from many, many people across this country about what they saw in that leaked document. we obviously want people's privacy to be respected. we want people to protest peacefully if they want to protest. >> right now, anita and john, there appears to be some bipartisan concern on capitol hill because texas republican senator john cornyn and delaware senator, a democr