that in person by screaming at sam alito and his family. "i don't have an official u.s. position on where people should protest." really? are those the rules now? how would you feel if people showed up outside michelle obama's house? they would be thrown into thumb screws and charged with racism. but conservative supreme court justices deserve it. that's her position. it's not in fact since we are speaking of this topic the official position of the u.s. government. no. according to 18 u.s. code 1507, the official position of the u.s. government, you're not allowed to intimidate judges period. "whoever with the intent of interfering with, obstructing or impeding the administration of justice or attempt to influencing any judge, juror, witness or court officer in discharge of his duty, pickets or parades near a court of the united states or in or near a resident occupied or used by judge or officer, uses a device or uses any demonstration near any such building or residence shall be fined or imprisoned." it's clearly a crime. jen psaki didn't

people are understandably upset with sam alito's views. sheere with sam said. v soie you shouldn't be surprised. they want to express that concern in person by screaming at sam alito and his family. quote, i don't have an official u.s. government position on where people should protest jen psaki or those are the rules. now how would you feel if angryp protesters showed up outside, say michelle obama's houseed? a of course they'd be thrown into thumbscrews within minutes and charged with racism wou andu would applaud as they languished in jail. but conservative supreme court justices know that's a different story because conservative supreme court justices deserve it.es that'ser john saki's position.tr but it is not. in fact, since we've speaking of this topic, the official positionio of the u.s. governmet ,no, according to 18 u.s. code 15 07, the official position of the u.s. government is you're not allowed to intimidate judges, period, quote whoever with the intent of interfering with obstructing or impeding the administration of justicetig with the intent of

supreme court, obstruct justice and someone leaks sam alito's justice alito's draft majority opinionoverturning roe versus wade was only a draft. that doesn't necessarily mean that's the final decision

persons on television keep describing sam alito as a hater. somebody just hates women hates and hates rights. a sadist whose only pleasure is extinguishing human freedom and happiness, both of which of course are predicated on abortion. that's what they're saying about alitowhen. now we're not familiar with sam alito source. we can't confirm or deny hua this either way. but we can tell you having actually read his opinion that there is no hint of any ofc this in what he has written. in fact,ve there's not even an attack on abortion. he could be pro-choice for allno we know, samuel alito merely argues that americanss have the right to vote on how abortion is regulated. and for nearly 50 years, roe versus wade has prevented voters from doing that . it has taken that right from them. that'sm that's the sum total of the supposedly controversial opinion by samuel alito. and if you don't believe it here so that opinion concludes quote. the constitution does nob prohibit the citizens of each state from regulating or prohibiting abortion. roe and the

a week ago exactly, an unnamed saboteur of the supreme court leaked a draft opinion by justice sam alito's lie roe v. wade ought to be overturned. people went completely hysterical, but his views were not especially controversial. roe is bad law over the past half-century many have acknowledged that including many pro-choice democrats, including joe biden. if you are an office holder who supports legal abortion, the obvious solution is to vote for legal abortion had passed a law like they do in democracies. it is not complicated. that is how it's supposed to work. democracy is a tiresome process and worst of all the outcome isn't always guaranteed. they prefer what they call direct action, not democracy. liberal activists immediately set about threatening the supreme court justices and attacking christianity. a group called ruth, in honor of ruth bader ginsburg, hosted the home address of every supreme court justice because they are conservative. to invite violence and harassment committed get them to change their votes. then ruth sent this to practicing catholics across the country. "stuf

just so you know, once sam alito would said around that first draft, every other justice would sent him a memo saying i will join it or i am thinking of concurrence or i am waiting for the decent. there is communications that follows that even if it is not an actual draft. the others are they do tend to send memos that they would circulate to all but my experiences especially with the chief that he would work privately sometimes. he did that with affordable care act in 2012. we know in the past with the 1973 roe v. wade and the 1989 abortion case that where the justices staff short of reversing roe and certainly 1992 when the justices -- they were working privately. i anticipate something like that are going on but i do want to remind you, laura and certainly our audience that key conservative justices will make sure there were compromises back in '89 and '92 are not like our conservatives today. the conservatives we have today are far to the right and i would not expect someone like alito and gorsuch and barrett to vote for a compromise. brett kavanaugh? possibly, laura. >> the words y

what kind of area to sam alito and his fellow conservative justices want to take america back to?k you very much mattie, for having me this evening. what they're demonstrating is they're extremists, they're radical, and having an abortion, abortion access is a personal decision that people need to make the reason why i never talked about it until the most recent draconian measures, in the states, was because it was my own personal decision. it was nobody else's decision that's exactly what it should be, no one should decide what i'm going to do with my health care and with my body. so, this is about alito and what he has written in this leaked opinion and we do need to remember though that abortions are still legal, some around minding people of that. but what he has shown i once again is that he's extreme, he's trying to take away our personal liberties, our personal freedoms, and our bodily autonomy, and we're not gonna stand for that. we're gonna organize, we're gonna get very active, and we're gonna fight and make sure that we lacked officials as a state at the federal level w

sam alito said that in the last day or two. we expect that's the decision. a majority decision.e had just justice sam alito -- justice clarence thomas saying in the last day, i think maybe even today, that people need to get used to accepting outcomes. and that's -- that's a good statement as far as it goes if you're detached from history or speaking in a vacuum. but when you have an outcome that people think is tainted in some way, because there was cheating in some way or bad faith in some way, or the methodology or the arguments made in favor of the outcome are things that are unusual and perhaps even unprecedented and in in constitutional history then people have a harder team dealing with the outcome and maybe you'll put up the quote in a minnesota it's ironic coming from clarence thomas when the outcome in the country, the political outcome in the country that has been most resisted with violence and other means has been the election of 2020, which, you know, has raised a lot of controversy because clarence thomas's wife was in communication with people with respect to jan

that sam alito is accessing.eve that the founding fathers in their infinite wrongness were overcome by the 14th amendment which guaranteed equal protection to all people in this country or get dumped, and if you don't believe that the 14th amendment should -- guaranteed women rights to their own reproductive system just like a man has a right to his own reproductive system, if you don't believe, that then we are living in a situation where women have second class citizen status. if you do believe in the 1'd amendment worked, then samuel alito's legal reasoning is laughable on its face and wrong. >> yeah, i agree. >> i want to -- real quick, li zz because we're out of time. >> i was going to say in reading it it read like an anti-abortion activist wrote it, not a supreme court justice. >> well, one might argue that one did. marital rape actually finally was illegal in all of the u.s. states in 1993, 1993. women have barely had any rights in this country most of the time women have been in this country. thank you b

cnn is still trying to confirm a new report by politico saying it obtained a draft opinion of sam alitoe supreme court is ready to strike down the landmark decision in roe v. wade as well as k.c.v. planned parndhood. this is from page five of a draft opinion obtained by politico. we hold that rho and casey must be overruled. the constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of rho and casey rely the due process clause of the 14th amendment. jessica schneider joins us by phone. talk -- what more do we know about what they have decided? >> reporter: yeah, so, anderson, i mean, this is just an absolutely stunning report. and if it's true, as politico say, this would be a stunning breach of court confidentiality. politico says that it has obtained this draft majority opinion written by justice samuel alito overturning rho v wade saying there is no constitutional right to abortion. again, this is just a draft opinion. we're expecting a final opinion from this court sometime in the next eig

a week ago exactly an unnamed saboteur, the supreme court leaked a draft opinionam by justice sam alito explaining why roe v. wade ought to be overturnedd. now people are completely hysterical over it but actually is a legal matter.no alito's views were not especially controversial. roe is bad law. over the past half century, many have acknowledged that , including many pro-choice democrats including joe biden. so this point forty nine years in if you're anre officeholderff who supports legal abortion, the obvious solution is to vote for legal abortion, pass a law t like they do in democracies. it's not complicated. that's how it's supposed to work. but democrats have no interest in that. democracy is a tiresome process and worst of all, the outcomeys isn't always guaranteed. gey they prefer what they prefer whl direct action, not democracy. so liberal activists immediately set about threatening supreme court justicesre and attacking christianity. a group called ruth sentanity. , which is named in honor of ruth bader ginsburg, posted the home addresses of every supreme court justice who

justice sam alito, in the opinion, tried to say that and tried to distinguish it by saying that abortionhuman life. and so it's different from those other things. but when you look at that, that analysis, it's called substantive due process. that's that right that you're talking about, the rights that are not expressly in the constitution, but that the court has recognized as fundamental. it'the privacy right that the right to abortion was based upon. that underscores the rights to access contraception, the right to have privacy to do what you please in your own home and extendto other things. it could include the same sex marriage right, depending on the way that it's interpreted. i think those and interracial marriage and other things are also based on equal protection, which may make those a little harder to attack. but certainly there are a number of rights that we think about in terms of liberty that are protected by the constitution, or at least have been until they, too, are challenged. and if it's thrown out the same way that this privacy right was essentially thrown out by justi

a week ago exactly an unnamed saboteur, the supreme court leaked a draft opinionam by justice sam alitoe v. wade ought to be overturnedd. now people are completely hysterical over it but actually is a legal matter.no alito's views were not especially controversial. roe is bad law. over the past half century, many have acknowledged

sam alito referring to the 1973 decision in roe v. wade writes "roe was wrong from the start.s reasoning was exceptionally weak and the decision has had damaging consequences i'm far from bringing about international settlement of abortion issue, roe versus casey abortion decision that followed it inflamed debate and deepen division. reaction as you might imagine as it swept from both sides of the debate. >> this is bittersweet. on the one hand, it is sweet because we are finally vindicating the constitution. and for babies who have been unprotected by the law, the better part is the way this was leaked. this was an utter disgrace in terms of how it was leaked. >> here is what president biden said about the possibility of congressional action during the debate back in 2020. >> a woman does have a right to choose. i would, in fact, relit to be unconstitutional, i will stand to the united states congress and it will pass, i believe, a bill, excuse me, that legislates roe v. wade justify casey. it is a woman's right to do that, period. >> okay, we will see what happens with congr

no one wanted sam alito to vote the wrong way. now those plans are underway.t's no exaggeration to say once the step gets going, you don't know where it winds up. people can get hurt because of this leak. you hate to think it could happen and you hate to think it could happen. people do. here they are. ada chavez works for the nation. she's some kind of reporter. she tweeted it's good that conservative justices and their families will have their lives threatened. she's in favor of that. over at vox.com, ian millheiser shouted f it, let's burn this place down. government by tantrum. and brian fallon, the executive director of the activist ground "demand justice" or else, said this quote, is a brave clerk taking the step of leaking a document warning the country in a last ditch hail mary to see the public response to make the court reconsider? like do what we want or we will hurt you? these are threats of violence. the ceo of planned parenthood is calling on activists to storm state capitol buildings. watch this. >> we know this decision will enrage people. we k

tucker: ever since someone inside the supreme court broke centuries of tradition and law by leaking sam alito'sd for overturning roe v. wade, they've been harassing their families at home. they have attacked a police in l.a., they firebombed a pro-life movement on sunday and they held a pro-abortion protest at the arizona state capitol. remember safe, legal, and where? they are just for it now, and they are saying it. they shot some pretty shocking footage of the people who were there. here is a sample. >> keep your laws of me. >> [bleep] [indistinct] >> tucker: you don't have to be a religious person to see that there's a spiritual component to all of this. allison is a pro-life advocate who joins us. thank you so much for coming on. this doesn't -- it seems like we've left the realm of a political debate or even a bully debate over rights and moved into another realm entirely. >> it so hard to watch, because it is human beings treating human beings the worst. but time and time again, pro-life individuals go out, they try to make the case for life, they are willing to take this verbal beating

. >> [chanting] >> protesters gathering after a leaked draft opinion allegedly written by sam alito.

a week ago exactly, an unnamed saboteur of the supreme court leaked a draft opinion by justice sam alito's, but his views were not especially controversial. roe is bad law over the past half-century many have acknowledged that including many

abortion rights supporters marched to the homes of justices john roberts, brett kavanaugh and sam alito v. wade could be overturned. and the u.s. marshal said that it was helping to respond to increased security concerns. >>> and mitch mcconnell is using his perch to criticize democrats for forcing a vote this week to shore up abortion rights. >> schumer wants the senate to vote again on a bill that would legalize abortion on demand. their bill is written to protect abortionists rather than mothers. >> the bill isn't about abortion on demand and the bill doesn't contemplate abortion through all nine months. that is what is known as a straw man. it is about codifying roe v. wade something democrats see as urgent perhaps even more sore after mcconnell said that national ban was possible if democrats pick up seats in the upcoming elections. and even his own party is throwing cold water on it. and joining me is zachary wolf, senior politics writer. let's start with some simple math. a national ban on abortion would require 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. mcconnell doesn't have the 60 vot

these justices we've talked about, from amy coney barrett to brett kavanaugh to neil gorsuch to even sam alito himself have spoken about the value of precedent and the value of it being reaffirmed because it lends not only the weight to the public but the wealth of wisdom that we come to rely on in this court. >> perfect segue, laura. let's pick up now, 2006, during the alito scotus nominee, his hearing there, this is an exchange with dick durbin on precedent, stare decisis. >> do you believe it is the settled law of the land? >> roe vs. wade is an important precedent of the supreme court. it was decided in 1973, so it's been on the books for a long time. it has been challenged on a number of occasions, and i think that when a decision is challenged, and it is reaffirmed, that strengthens its value as stare decisis for at least two reasons. first of all, the more often a decision is reaffirmed, the more people tend to rely on it. and second, i think stare decisis reflects the view that there is wisdom embedded in decisions that have been made by prior justices. >> steve, how do you reconcile t

these supporters right now on the screen stood in front of justice sam alito's home thanking for his stance in the draft opinion. two senators, democrat chris coons from delaware and john cornyn of texas came together to introduce a measure in the state that would provide security around the clock for the family of supreme court justices. other members of the senate appear to be on board. late wednesday night, authorities put up the tall barricades outside the u.s. supreme court. while the court does not discuss security, they say it's precautionary. one person notably that we have not heard from when it comes to people protesting outside of supreme court justices' homes, the president. martha? >> martha: good point. thanks very much, david spunt. let's bring in mike huckabee, former arkansas governor, leo terrell, constitutional law and civil rights attorney. both are fox news contributors. and we have mickey here also who supporting progressive women running for congress. welcome to all of you. good to have you with us today. governor huckabee, i want to start with what david spunt

sam alito can't speak in public now and no one is saying anything about it, like what?er, this is criminal cartel behavior, threatening political opponents or any opposition, this is exactly what we see in third world countries when it comes to politics. but this is the same playbook we saw in 2020. the far left views politicians, democrats, they gaslight their bulk mob in order to mobilize them, energize them to commit political violence and literally get political goals done for them. that is literally domestic terrorism. they used blm to do it, they used antifa to do it come immediately after the scotus documents were leaked a couple days ago, i started to track antifa on twitter and immediately it antifa was calling to terrorize their oppressors, they took to the streets in portland and started to analyze. this is the new normal they want us to accept where riots are normal and only the far left can commit political violence and get a political point across. i'm not saying the right to do that i'm saying it is clear the deep state and far left is doing it and they a

. >> [chanting] >> protesters gathering after a leaked draft opinion allegedly written by sam alito.have special expanded coverage tonight from lawmakers and legal experts to political analysis. kevin corke starts us shannon. law professor jonathan turley writing "it's hard not to view this as a malicious act." he went on to call it a breach of the most fundamental obligations and traditions of the court. the greatest crisis. chief justice roberts' face on the court in your tonight as you point out, politico is reporting exclusively that the supreme court has voted to strike down the landmark roe v. wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by justice samuel alito circulated inside the court. according to politico, the draft opinion is a full started repudiation of the 1973 1973 decision. subsequent 1992 decision planned parenthood v casey that largely maintain that right. in the draft opinion there are a few quotes from justice alito. among them, roe was egregiously wrong from the start. we hold that roe and casey must be overruled and it's time to heed t

but as we've seen in this drafted opinion these five justices led by sam alito want to go all the wayo roe v. wade. >> jessica schneider live for us at the supreme court. thank you so much. >> joining me now is cnn legal analyst jennifer rodgers and cnn legal analyst jeffrey toobin. let me read in this ruling which is historymaking, generationally history making. it says we hold that roe and casey must be overruled. the constitution makes no such reference to abortion. again, it's a draft and if it comes out in two months and we have ever reason to expect it will, this morning, this changes what? >> this changes everything for women's right for abortion. it means that the states get to decide. women in half of the states, united states of america, abortion will be for states released or for those who try to pass legislation like this or soon will be, in 22, 26 states will be illegal as soon as the summer. >> we have a map that we rolled out that people can see in terms of the impact that people will have almost immediately. it does kick it back to the states. and supporters of the dec

some of it is the voice of sam alito, that i think you can hear quite clearly in there, so i'm glad chiefed it's authentic, because it seemed that way us to. there's a reason it's so strident in tone, and that's buzz the task at hand, overturning roe vs. wade, a precedent that's almost a half century in the books, if you're going to do that under the frame work most justices do cases you have to build up a head of steam. you can't say, i notice this is off and that's off and chuck it in the waste bin. that's not the way the supreme court normally operates, and it certainly doesn't on high profile cases when people don't expect it to. so i think alito's rhetoric is amped up for a reason, and that's to ridicule the roe opinion in such a way that it becomes easier to knock the legs out from under it. that's the task that he seems to be embarked on. it's also another reason why it's very hard to see chief justice john roberts joining this if it looks anything like it does right now. there's just language in there about -- >> so, josh -- >> yeah. >> if the right is winning why aren't they acti

five days since we got the post row reality that the supreme court is poised to usher in with the sam alito opinion erasing abortion rights in america. we still do not fully understand the far-reaching consequences that this decision could have. the implications of rolling back women's rights in this particular way. using this decision and the reasoning laid out by justice alito will have a ripple effect that is beginning to come into full view. this is as legal experts digest the opinion and anti-and portion this emboldened by this victory. they have draconian ways to stand up the bodily autonomy of our population. conservative states enacted 108 laws restricting abortions in some form or another last year according to the good mark institute. it is a research institute that studies reproductive health right. more than 30 have been enacted. the number of women seeking abortions in the united states has been on the decline. from 2010 to 2019, the number of legal abortions performed in the country each year has dropped by more than 100,000. that downward trend is not because republicans have

opinion, we don't know what the final opinion will be, but the draft opinion was written by justice sam alitosterful opinion. it is careful, it is scholarly, it is historical. it walks through how for the first 185 years of our nation's history the question of abortion was decided by elected legislatures, decided primarily at the state level. and, listen, we all recognize abortion is an issue that is deeply personal, that is deeply motional, and it's an issue on which americans are sharply divided. there are very, very different views on what the appropriate rules should be. and for the first 185 years of our nation's history, we resolved those in the elected legislatures. then in 19 is 73 -- 1973 seven unelected lawyers wearing black robes said, you silly voters, you don't get to decide. we mow better than you, and we're going to decree the answer for the entire country. and i think that decision in roe really caused an enormous amount of anger and frustration for the tens of millions of people who passionately care about this issue, who have been engaged in this issue. you had a these un--

it could end up being a strongly worded as sam alito has written at this point since the court has vouched for its authenticity, but my mantra about the supreme court is often it ain't over until it's over. but with this becoming so public, it makes it harder, i think, for the justices to do in negotiations, and i know the chief justice did not want to go as far as these five justices to his right were. he did not want to try to overturn roe. one last thing i want to mention is this court is already so bitterly divided, and we've already seen recriminations and finger pointing breakthrough that i think that there will be a blame game coming up soon at the court as they try to get to the bottom of it. and they may never get to the bottom of it. we don't know if this was something that was sinister. if someone was trying to influence the negotiations by making it public. or it could be somebody who left a briefcase on the train. you know? you just don't know how this came about. >> but the truth here is that there's so much secrecy involved in what happens inside the supreme court and in the

now, as we know, votes can shift in the process but obviously, what sam alito was writing that politico obtained was a robust objection of roe that's been around for nearly 50 years. the 1973 landmark made abortion legal nationwide essentially let women decide to terminate a pregnancy until about the 23rd week of pregnancy. so if this becomes the law of the land and it looks like it's headed in that direction, your word seismic would be practically an understatement here because it would change so much in terms of women's rights in america. and the other thing that is such a jolt to use a word that john roberts himself used and used at his own senate confirmation hearing is the way this all came out, don. typically, any draft opinion stays private. it's -- you know, i will often get leaks about votes. i'll often gets leaks who is writing the opinion but to get an opinion in hand that's gone as far as this one does on this big of an issue is amazing and i do have to say it presents the court with a couple different problems and i think it plays into how the confidence that the american p

this draft opinion holes of the reasoning here behind sam alito's opinion. he is returning this decision to the states. it is a states rights feel to it. and that does not mean individuals to voters. that means the state legislators. which in many red states involve highly gerrymandered republican majorities. so we know with the outcome of women's rights will be in those states. and at the same time, justice alito is hammering the importance of returning-less decision to the state, rather than having roe, which guarantees abortion rights as the lava land. we now have mitch mcconnell, who frankly has a track record in this area. he has been talking about a national abortion ban for many years, and in 2013, he spoke at the national right to life convention meeting. and he said that if he became the speaker, rather the majority leader in the senate, and he too would push for a national band. so there is a little bit of hypocrisy and inconsistency going on here. i think maybe saying that it is a little bit is overly generous. the goal here, though, is control of

supreme court, obstruct justice and someone leaks sam alito's justice alito's draft majority opinion overturning roe versus wade was only a draft. that doesn't necessarily mean that's the final decision. now tonight we're going to on this program we will separate fact from fiction and the reaction of the left has gone absolutely insane. let me be clear again, an official decision has not been made in this case. the court has not ruled one way or the other. i actually suspect that professor dershowitz, this theory that he offered last night on this program will be correct. but time will tell this leak is likely, he said, as a result of a self-serving far left court employee who perhaps is attempting to coerce the court's decision or maybe make the case for court packing, whatever the case may be , we'll find out hopefully sooner or later. chief justice roberts called the leak a quote, a singular and egregious breach of that trust. that is an affront to the court . he continued to the extent this betrayal of the confidence of the court was intended to undermine the integrity of our ope

ever>> since someone inside the supreme court broke centuries of tradition and law by leaking sam alito'saft opinion in which he argued for overturning roe v. wade, abortion enthusiasts have harassed supreme court justices and their families at home. they've attacked policee officers in l.a. they firebombed a pro-life group in wisconsin on sunday, plannedd parenthood held a quote, pro-abortion protest at the arizonan state capitol . remember, safe, legal and rare., no, not anymore. just for it now. and they're saying it. the journalist drew hernandez attended that protest and shot some pretty shocking footage ofr the people who were there. here's a sample . >> take a lot out ofou my denaturalizes out of my hair . a baby now haggada hangers-on. that means your mom killed your offer away. i tried to get ready, but she found oh , know, i didn't want to get into work and she just killed me like, you know, you're cute no matter what . every month when you have a natural cycle, you're killing it in your name. don't have to be abe religious person to see that there's a spiritual component to all

supreme court justice sam alito made his first public remarks since the leak of a draft decision thatol at george mason university telling the students he was not going to discuss the matter. he says the court is working on cases as they near the end of their term next month, but did not expand any further if the court rules in accordance with the draft, more than 20 states are expected to ban abortions, it's still not known who leaked the document. happening today. there will be a rally in san francisco to march for reproductive justice, multiple bay area. community members and organizations will host the event. the march will meet between grove and hyde street near the san francisco civic center. it starts at 11:00am. coming up on the kron. 4 morning news. a bay area firefighter is back home after lending a hand in ukraine. >> his incredible story from overseas. and get ready. concerts are coming back to levi stadium this weekend. we show you how levis is getting ready for its expected busiest concert season since the venue opened. welcome back. >> concert season is back in apparent

this is written by sam alito in february. they may have changed by now. one thing that i find fascinating. we do not pretend to know how our political system or society will respond to today's decision over roe and casey. even if we could foresee we would not let that knowledge influence our decision. a lot more to come. it is rich and we'll share it with you over the next two hours coming up. >> dana: also primary day in ohio and indiana. all eyes are closely watching this ohio gop senate race as several candidates make their final pitch to voters. we're live in cleveland today. alicia, a big day in ohio. >> really big day, dana. good morning to you. most of the polling heading into today indicated that most voters have not settled on a candidate here in the gop senate primary. they simply haven't decided. seven are on the ballot to take on the democrat in november. d.j. vance who received the president trump endorsement and gave his kam plain a remarkable shot in the arm. josh mandel, the former state treasurer is aligned with policy supported by the tr

angry protests outside the home of sam alito this time. how will this play out now among the american people? >> dana: more states are holding primaries today. one contest is a battle between two incumbents. how that ended up happening. >> bill: new details on a series of serious deaths in bahamas. americans complaining of nausea, swollen limbs. what could have caused that? dr. michael boden is in the house today. >> it was scary, being here right now and it is a little uncomfortable for both of us because we just don't know yet. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for whatchya... line? need. liberty biberty— cut. liberty... are we married to mutual? only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ okay everyone, our mission is to provide complete balanced nutrition for strength and energy. woo hoo! ensure, complete balanced nutrition with 27 vitamins and minerals. and ensure complete with 30 grams of protein. ♪ ♪ your record label is taking off. but so is your sound engineer. you need to hire. i

could call it, neil, a peaceful praise, supporters stood quietly in front of supreme court justice sam alitong him for his stance in that leaked draft opinion two senators democrat chris coons from delaware and republican senator john cornyn of texas came together to introduce a measure in the senate that would provide around the clock security for not only supreme court justices but their family members, the family members are key here following that leaked draft opinion, other members of the senate appear also to be on board with this. >> people should not serve in public life and feel that outrageous extremeists on either end of the political agenda suddenly have license to physically verbally attack a public official. reporter: president biden himself has yet to weigh in on this at least on camera in a public forum specifically about people protesting outside the homes of supreme court justices. neil? neil: david spunt thank you very much and do any of you remember the former supreme court justice scalia very worried about this sort of thing his son, chris scalia will be my special guest

kavanaugh and last night in the commonwealth of virginia they went to sam alito's house. ach him at the supreme court. they chanted about our voice, our bodies, alito is a coward. >> ainsley: abort the court. vetting the protesters to make sure it was safe and nothing got out of hand and there wasn't any violence. alito's house about 100 people can you see there a big crowd walking down his street. >> brian: there were reports that he was there. that they got out ahead of time. this was tell graphed that they did. big question is this legal or not? can you actually -- can you stand in front of somebody's house. who happens to be a justice and try to sway a decision? >> steve: no. >> brian: you can do it but the question is at what level if you are there protesting, by the way, one of the people, kavanaugh's neighbor was leading the protest over the weekend. evidently doesn't like him. >> steve: got to be awkward. >> brian: code 15 o07 whoevers the intent of obstructing or impeding the administration of justice or attempt to influence any judge. by going outside his house,

although sam alito pointed out i don't see it there other people see it as the end of a life.hat is why, for instance, the catholic church is so stridently against abortion. >> ainsley: people wonder why joe biden keeps flip-flopping on his views. we saw that down at the border. he said we need to aclosed border earlier. now he is saying well his actions are saying we need an open border. >> steve: he would rather talk about abortion than inflation. >> ainsley: absolutely, yeah. i'm sure they were thrilled this news came down yesterday so they could pivoted to a new topic instead of inflation. here is senator lindsey graham talking about high joe biden is hijacked or is hijacked by the extremists. >> what happened to joe biden? he got hijacked bite most radical people in the country. captivated their interest. what happened in court today was the saddest day in the history of the supreme court. stupid dangerous and dumb. if the if you are a conservative you are a traitor to the cause. if you are a liberal you are the dumbest person in washington. it's not going to change the m

sam: president biden's statement, i can best describe it as horrific. justice alito'sn was explicit, no other case or relive an issue before the court has any -- or relevant issue before the court has anything to do with this, period. it is a strawman's argument. geoff: samuel rodriguez and michelle goodwin, thanks. michelle: thank you. ♪ geoff: after he took office, president biden proposed providing two years of tuition-free community college. after congressional opposition to many of his larger plans, that plan was dropped. there have been efforts at the local and state level to boost college-going rates by offering free or reduced tuition to students who meet certain requirements, such as living in a designated community or attending a specific school. there are now more than 400 such programs across the country. san atonio, texas, which has one of the highest urban poverty rates in the country, launched its own project in 2019. special correspondent hari sreenivasan reports for our series on rethinking college. hari: on a recent morning, juniors and seniors at san

in a world where sam alito is in charge of abortion laws, that is one massive, massive crisis. shady data brokers are tracking women that go to planned parenthood and they'll sell that data to anybody around who has a credit card. imagine what not just prosecutors, but these deranged far right vigilantes can do with this data, the apps women use, the websites they visit, places they go, all of it could be used against them by prosecutors. in short, mr. president, this is uterus surveillance. that's what's coming down the pipe unless congress acts and gets serious about consumer privacy and prohibiting the government making end runs around the fourth amendment. it's a shock to me how little concern there seems to be for some of these big issues. it's a full-out sprint towards massive government overreach and severe restrictions on women's freedoms and privacy. mr. president, there is zero thought, zero, given to victims of race. there is zero thought, zero thought given to victims of incest. there's zero thought to women being exploited after being forced to have back room abort

in a world where sam alito is in charge of abortion laws, that is one massive, massive crisis. shady data brokers are tracking women who go to planned parenthood clinics, and they'll sell that data to anybody around whose got a credit card. imagine for a moment whatnot just prosecutors but these deranged far-right vigilantes can do with this data. the apps women use, the websites they visit, the places they go, all of it can be used against them by prosecutors. in short, mr. president, this is uterus surveillance. that's what's coming down the pike unless congress acts and gets serious about consumer privacy and prohibiting the government from making end runs around the fourth amendment. it is a shock to me how little concern there seems to be for some of these big issues. it's a full-out sprint toward massive government overreach and severe restrictions on women's freedom and privacy. mr. president, there is zero thought -- zero -- given to victims of rape. there is zero thought, zero thought given to victims of incest. there's zero thought to women being exploited after being

high-tech condemnation of clarence thomas and the similarly unfounded attacks on brett kavanaugh, on sam alito, and on other republican nominees to the court. senator schumer's very public attempt to intimidate the court by standing in front of the supreme court building during oral arguments in the louisiana abortion case, june medical, shouting, i want to tell you, gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions, close quote. the constitution, mr. president, is structure. it is a process and an organization. when democrats threaten another branch of government for political ends, they threaten that structure itself. it is dangerous. it is wrong. and i pray for the sake of our nation that it never succeeds. to that end, every member of this body should be condemning these efforts and condemning the efforts of those described in the axios article that ran today explaining that the department of homeland security is now having to investigate serious credible threats of p