>> that is a great question for adam schiff.the house managers, how did the house send over documents to begin the impeachment when they're still in violation of their own resolution which by the way was set up after the fact. i think the president's lawyers did a great job yesterday showing how the sham impeachment started by nancy pelosi deeming it to happen. had to be corrected when they house resolution 660, passed it almost month 1/2 later. that shows they're still in violation of their on rules. it is a onerous attack by democrats who had only one thing in mind, let's impeach the president. remember nancy pelosi's words he is impeached for life. he will never get rid of this. that sounds like a somebody on vend quetta than find the truth because the truth is he did nothing wrong. maria: ted cruz said on the program he will be acquitted for life. by the way, that was from senator cruz. let me ask you where this is going, how does monday, tomorrow, play out? do you have any sense what your colleagues in the senate on the dem

adam schiff repeated of course.ut susan collins some say is a republican on the defense, lisa murkowski, they both -- lisa actually yelled not true in the senate which is not like people in the senate. lisa murkowski said that is over the top. that's when you lost me. did adam schiff come in with a clean slate or is he known as pinocchio. >> he is insulting. we know he's the white house counsel that brought up 2017 interview where he said we have all the information, this is not just information circumstantial, we know what the president did. so he has been saying these conspiracy theories all along that we have secret information on the president and we know his motives and we got what we need and over and over again. it is not true. he is not saying what is actually factual he's trained to spin something and that was shown clearly today whether it was white house meeting that even in the phone call the president zelensky said why don't we just meet in poland instead in the house managers locked apart. but it was o

does schiff control the senate democrats?> first off, it's boring, they aren't saying anything new. they show up and show the same video, i think they have lost everybody including the public on this. but we are going to have a fair trial. i don't know if we will have witnesses, if we do we ought to hear from hunter biden. >> laura: senator kennedy said he learned new things at the trial, could that mean the doors open to witnesses of he learned some new things? i don't know what he was doing for the last couple of months but he learns new things, we could hear from witnesses? >> i think he was probably just stressing his impartiality, we get asked about that all the time. i agree with rick, what we have seen so far -- and i did pay attention to it because they do a lot of this and you've got to be on the ball because you get asked about it all the time. you had the audiovisual aids, the same information and it's also in a vacuum to where we haven't seen the defense. that's the dynamic changer. >> laura: i want to talk about

what you saw was adam schiff playing adam schefter videos and making adam schiff's come his last commentf the night was telling because he had to make up something again. he did it to the republican senate and they don't put up with us. he said your heads are going to be on a and they literally all said no one told us that if we oppose the president. who would believe that when you've got senator rand paul and mike leake, they question the president. go to the media and openly question the president unlike the other side, they have no issues with that. i feel like that's the adam schiff that they forget when they come over to the u.s. senate and they go on the floor and they tell those 53 republicans with a guy told last night was about actually their head or the president is a dictator or it's about make ukraine great again and all of those ukrainians we can learn so much from. the truth is, sean, it's wonderful to have allies and is nothing against ukraine. we don't want to ever be like ukraine. i don't want to be dependent on other countries for my security or be debated around like t

this is about schiff. schiff is a guy who is a pathological liar. he seems to have no ability to distinguish between the truth and falsehood. he lied for two and a half years about the russian collusion. it all disintegrated. he looked like a fool. he learned nothing. he came back in lied again and again. here we are at the end of the cycle, he goes back, and the guy is still lying again. i think somehow, people have to decide that adam schiff is a compulsive, uncontrollable liar, to be dealt with that way. listen, a healthy house wouldco strip him of the intelligencenc committee. how can you expect the president and the cia and others to share secrets with a person who is this profoundly, publicly dishonest? this is a schiff problem that we've learned over the last few months, this guy literally is a path of hunter: hair. >> laura: well, this permeates media, as well, newt, because one msnbc and guest floated thit conspiracy theory about what trump's acquittal would actually mean. >> imagine donald trump deciding sometime in june, i heard this cons

that would be adam schiff. now, the president didn't say, by the way, in the transcript, even though, yeah, schiff had to make that up too appeared he didn't say, do me a favor. he said, do us a favor. he said, in relation to the united states, and of course, we have the ukrainian court. they both determined that there was election interference to help hillary clinton. they cited. by the way, interference that we were all worked up about for three long years. it takes 22 minutes to read it. naturally, that was only one of many lives today from the congenital liar. now, this is pretty amazing. one truly bizarre example from earlier today, yep, the congenital liar, schiff, actually doubled down on a lie that has previously earned him four pinocchio's from the liberal "washington post"." for a democrat, that's hard to get. despite the mountain of evidence that he communicated with the fake whistle-blower, well, congenital liar still claiming he had no idea with the person is. do you believe him? he is contradicted

i'm told adam schiff is again back doing it more. now, if i was a terrible host, i would force you to endure watching the regurgitation, the repetition. put it up for a second. the insanity that has gone on all day, america, 24 hours of never ending babbling, repetitive talking points over what was nothing and, by the way, remember he sent the new evidence about lev parnas over to the senate in the 29th hour? in that letter he said quid pro quo and hunter zero experience got the prosecutor fired they did nothing wrong. really? okay. keep talking to yourself. no matter what happens in the coming days, always remember congressman jim jordan's four irrefutable facts that will never change. he will join us. one we have a transcript of phone conversation the president released. actually, two phone conversations, with him amend president zelensky. aid was never mentioned. it was never any linkage between biden, u.s. aid and the call. number two, jim jordan, both trump and president zelensky said there was no pressure, zero pressure, linkag

schiff got caught in another major lie. another one.s it turns out politico reporting he completely mischaracterized the sketchy new evidence that democrats tacked on after on the articles of impeachment in the 29th hour. add to that all the major lies. we have been tellingav you about them all. we have shown you again and again. and you have to ask why on earth, i don't think anybody does trust this, well, psychotic hack. now, we all know about his russia collusion fixation, hoax, lies. he wrote a whole report. devin nunes told you the truth. completely. we know about his fisa abuse lie. we know about him lying about the president's phone call with zelensky. we know he lied about the fake so-called hearsay whistleblower. we would love to hear from him. well, his whole team was communicating with the hearsay whistleblower from lethe get-go. and speaking of which, breaking tonight, paul sperry, wow, big blockbuster breaking news real clear investigations. he has dropped a major bombshell on the psychotic and lying congenital liar. accord

talk about adam schiff.thing towards the unfairness of the process with adam schiff which underscores how ridiculous it is to have something this vague as your chief article. gregg: i have 30 seconds left but schiff repeatedly tells senators oh, the evidence is overwhelming. why then does he need new witnesses that he didn't pursue? isn't defeating his own argument? >> well, it is hail mary, right? he is an advocate. i don't expect him to say this is weak stuff but he comes in, says i need more. that is the hope they turn some hearts on the republican side by having some bombshell comes out of thin air. i don't expect it. i expect they would announce it whether or not. he is hoping for new information that moves the needle. gregg: he is telling the senate an affront to due process if you don't have witnesses, like the due process you deprived trump of in the house proceedings. jim trusty, great as always. >> thanks, gregg. gregg: coming up next, new video of mexican authorities, flying, busing caravan member

a schiff has been called dazzling. i guess they forgot to mention he is a walking and talking magic 8 ball too. he can read the mind of attorney general bill barr just because barr said i didn't talk to anyone about this. big deal. 3rd, when they failed to have arguments good enough on their own they lean on the founder. here's jerry nadler. >> hamilton was a wise man. he saw danger far ahead of his time. given the threats they had to anticipate, the framers considered broad ground for removing presidents. >> laura: it sound damning. the "washington post" said that line was from a note that the treasury secretary wrote to washington about tax policy and didn't mention impeachment. anyone can take a fragment of what john jay said or roger sherman said and say, he agrees with me. it's what 8th graders do in bad essays. 4th, nadler also claimed this. >> the articles of impeachment against president trump rank among the most serious charges ever brought againstst a president. since president george washington took office i

Ãbsenator lisa murkowski just told us that adam schiff overreached tonight.e said he is a good order, cross the line at the end of the night. she said she hasn't decided whether to support witnesses and will wait until president trumps lawyers make their case. we will hear from charlotte, a democrat in kids texas. do you agree that adam schiff overreached tonight, charlotte? >> of course i don't. that's ridiculous. that's just another example of murkowski beginning with this statement that she wants to hear witnesses or she's considering it but not backing it up with her vote. her and cohen's and the others i'm hoping they come through. i'm disgusted by republicans talking about being bored and and not doing their duty. 70% of americans want witnesses. it's my understanding, 70% of republicans want witnesses. so who are these representatives representing? >> let's go back to the house, why do you think the house did not follow through and get witnesses? >> that's pretty simple, isn't it? they were obstructed. people talk about mueller as this thing that kind

schiff cannot make his case. and schumer has decided along with chesa boudin and others to put the senate on trial saying that the senate doesn't do what we want to do, then they are corrupt. the last part about this is really the problematic park. let's remind the audience that is. two people on the call, zelensky and president trump, no pressure, no conditionality on the eta. nothing done there. the ukrainians didn't know that aid was held up. at the end of the day, the aide was released and aid was releasd with no meeting. four facts never changed, the president did nothing wrong, the democrats want to do is stretch it out before next november. >> sean: you sounded a little there like jim jordan. and he's right. >> we got these facts that matter, folks and the folks are seeing through the schiff show and now the schumer exchange. >> sean: i call it the schumer-schiff sham shell. keep up with us, congressman. >> schumer hyphens between four sham show. got it. >> sean: congressman mike johnson, congress and john

schiff was clearly honest.that it would be devastating for the biden presidential campaign. that campaign, it turns out, must be protected at all stopped on my cost. destroyedim biden in the whole impeachment thing will be for naught. to tell you that the democratic establishment wants joe biden as the nominee in the first place because he is moderate and can win what is joe biden actually moderate? he hugs people, that doesn't mean he ishr moderate. he's just not a threat to the lifestyle of democratic leaders. an immigration for example he's not moderate by any definition. in a recent interview advice, biden explicit even illegal aliens who commit drunk driving offenses ought to be allowed to stay here forever. watch. >> you only arrest for the purpose of dealing with a felony that's committed, and i don't count drunk driving as a felony. >> tucker: have a few beers, blike whatever. drunk driving kills thousands of americans every year. democrats used to tell you a lot about that, biden doesn't care anymore,

i was in the chamber when adam schiff said that. collins, for one, who was a key swing vote, she shook her head repeatedly. she said that's not true. that's not true. other republican senators did the same. and just moments ago, lisa murkowski, another senator we are watching very closely who has not ruled out supporting subpoenas for witnesses. she said she thought he was doing fine until the pike comment. and this is when she say, quote, that's where he lost me. now, what does that mean for votes? we don't know yet. she didn't say if she would oppose witnesses -- vote subpoenas for witnesses, for documents. and we don't know if the four votes are there for getting to that point. other senators, including rob portman of ohio and west virginia, neither of them commented about whether they would support subpoenas. saying they would need to hear the president's team first. but pretty clear, adam schiff toward the end of that argument, did not make the republicans happy. it's similar to what we heard earlier in the week when jerry nadl

>> adam schiff, adam schiff is clearly scared that his case is so weak. adam schiff made the decision to withdraw the subpoenaed. subpoena. this is an unfair unconstitutional and half-baked set of impeachment articles that was sent over to the senate. >> when you talk about relevance, one, it's interesting to the question if john bohn said it it must be true even though the the present said it didn't happen, we don't take that. the interesting issue is these are all all the atom schiff whu started when he had his witnesses. i have a question for you. why wouldn't adam schiff be relevant as a witness when he met with the whistleblower before he became public, they want the whistleblower out there but when it became public that in metal or staff at contact then it's relevant -- irrelevant. what they wanted to do, clock on the account in house. you can make all the arguments that if she did it in the senate right now but go back because i've heard you talk mclynn and nixon. in clinton there was almost three years of a star report in which the question, white

schiff. so it was a powerful rendition of your dispute once meanwhile, joe biden shutting the door on the idea of a witness walk for him or his son, hunter, to testify. watch. >> this is a constitutional issue. we are not going to turn this into a farce, into some kind of political theater. they are trying to turn it into political theater, but i want no part of that. >> harris: "outnumbered." this is it. harris faulkner. kennedy. executive director, marie harf. in the center seat, former house oversight share and fox news contributor, jason chaffetz. great to see everybody today. we only have 30 minutes, so it is going to be compressed and powerful. kind of like you. [laughs] and all tha the insight that you bring. to give me the handicap on what we are seeing. >> jason: i don't think they are persuading anybody. i think the democrats are doing a good job of patting themselves on the back, but when jerry nadler leads with the idea that the facts are uncontested, you pretty much turn off ever

so is schiff punished for this?ven from polite society for falsely impugning the integrity of millions of americans with lies. no he wasn't. he got more famoused and more revered on msnbc. you can find him most weekdays now having lunch in the best restaurants in the city right across from the guys who planned the iraq war and got rich from subsecure prime time mortgages. he seems happy. why wouldn't he be? he got it all completely wrong. he wasn't punished. he was rewarded. that's how washington really works. keep that in mind as you watch adam schiff strut around the senate playing whatever character he has chosen. this the guy making the big decisions. this is the guy they admire. kim strassel someone we admire. she joins us tonight. thanks so much for coming on. let me ask you the question i have asked every night this week which is what is the point of this exactly? >> i think it is to allow adam schiff to spread more falsehoods to the country. i mean, look, you just mentioned the collusion one. he has been doi

what did schiff, what did schiff and the other mobs say on the floor of the senate?d they say? we don't want trump to get elected president again. we must stop him. in other words, they want to interfere in the 2020 election and prevent the republican party from nominating their president for a second term as president of the united states. it's right out there. they are interfering in the election senators. schumer has been collaborating with all these guys. why do you think nadler, low iq nadler was on the floor the other day saying, you are not upholding the constitution? they want to take the majority. this is about not only defeating trump in 2020, but defeating the senate. now, here's mostly what's going on. when you hear the arguments, they are projecting. they are not arguing evidence. they are protecting motives. this must have meant that. i have the phone call right here, the transcript. the president of the united states talking to the president of ukraine. in this phone call, there is no interference in the campaign. there is no threat to withholding mili

schiff, what do i do? you know what mr. schiff did? mr. cooperman went to the judge, and the house said never mind, we withdraw the subpoena, we promise not to issue it again. and then they come here, and they ask you to do the work that they refused to do for themselves. they ask you to trample on executive privilege now, would they ever suggest that the executives have determined, on its own, what the speech and debate clause means, of course not. would they ever suggest the discussions that the supreme court has behind closed doors? i hope not. but they come here, and they ask you to do what they refused to do for themselves. they had a court date and they withdrew the subpoena, they evaded the decision, and they are asking you to become complicit in that evasion of the court, it is ridiculous. we should call it out for what it is. obstruction for going to court? it is an act of patriotism to defend the constitutional rights of the president, because if they can do it to the president, they can do it to any of you, and they can do it to

schiff and mr. nadler of all people, because they chair significant committees, really should know this. and they should know what's happened. let me remind you of something. just .6 of a mile from this chamber sits the foreign intelligence court, also known as the fisa court. it is the court established and authorized under the foreign intelligence surveillance act to oversee requests by federal agencies for surveillance orders against foreign spies in the united states including american citizens. because of the sensitive nature of its business, the court is a more secret court. its hearings are closed to the public. in this court there are no defense counsel, no opportunity to cross examine witnesses and no ability to test evidence. the only material the courtesies are the materials submitted on trust -- on trust -- by members of the intelligence community with the presumption that he would be acting in good faith. on december 17th, 2019, the fisa court issued a scathing order in response to the

socks and adam schiff did a great job is because adam schiff is presenting opinion. people can disagree with the opinion, they say he is bad and people who agree with the opinion say he is dazzling. we know it's all opinion. the problem is we have all these fact-checkers and amazing journalists and they are just overloaded with adam schiff that they can't fact-check what he is doing. instead, what did they do? they discuss his performance. not the content, but the performance. oh, he really laid it out there. can you tell me what he laid out and whether or not it was true or false? most telling moment was that sound on tape that you played when schiff said impeachment is necessary because we can't count on 2020 being a legitimate election. think about that. he's saying that impeachment is a process is superior to an election. not just past ones in 2016 about future ones. what he is basically saying is that anybody can do this. he is saying this to prevent a future event. this is a figment in his brain. it's not even real. he is saying the 2020 election cannot be trus

but the subtext of what schiff -- adam schiff was saying today was that far more dangerous to us as a union is the obstruction of justice because of the fact that the one thing the framers wrote in, to put a check on the president of the united states, was congress. either through the ability to subpoena witnesses, or call witnesses, or have hearings. and if it comes to it, impeachment. without that, and schiff said this quite explicitly, without that, you know, you march toward tyranny to some extent. look, you know, people freak out a little bit when you start talking about tyranny and kings and stuff like that. but if there is a president with no check from congress that's where you get. and, look, we tried monarchy once in the united states. it didn't end particular ly well. we shouldn't go back there. it is very important that there be some check on a president's power. and i would think conservatives would agree with me on this. we don't want -- >> carl, what do you make of adam schiff's closing? >> i thought that the whole narrative, and particularly the closing, was the most s

congressman adam schiff fittingly of burbank, california, schiff, whose sources say, had not a singleend in high school, has been relishing his recent turn in the spotlight. he seems to have taken a break from joe mccarthy impression in which he repeatedly denounces political opponents as agents of the russian government. know trying a new role as a tough but lovable dean of students. schiff spent the entire day delivering a lecture about the terrorist of cheating like america was suddenly the world's largest middle school. watch. >> by inviting foreign interveterans and cheating in an election, to cheat in an election for precisely this reason. helping him cheat in the next election. to cheat in our election should we just get over it? this kind of cheating, really? if we are going to be honest and blatant about it, cheating. in other words, to cheat. >> tucker: keep your eyes on your own paper, class. but schiff didn't stay in character for long. at one point he seemed to switch abruptly from mr. chips to dr. strange love. the united states, schiff complained to the 19 viewers still

schiff wrote to mr. nadler. schiff claims mr.arnas continued to arrange a meeting with president zelensky. he goes on to stay quote trying get us mr. z. that's the biggy. because adam schiff doesn't dot his is and cross his ts. it turns out lev parnas was referring to the founder of the ukrainian national gas company burisma it wasn't the ukrainian president. adam schiff jumps to conclusion an wants to claim evidence means one thing and it's something else entirely. kind of like what he did with the entire process. insisting the president was trying to enforce a quid pro quo when his own witnesses said something else ebb tirely. >> the quid pro quo you were discussing was over the aid, correct? >> no. president trump when i asked him the open-ended question. what do you want from ukraine snow said i want nothing, i wouldn't no quid pro quo paper want president zelensky to do the right thing. trish: remember whenna adam wher when he tried to make us believe he and his office mad no contact with the whistleblower? >> we have not sp

here's one cnn analyst comparing adam schiff -- adam schiff! to a rock star. >> performance every single day, performances both from a substantive and presentation level have been amazing. >> it's like springsteen or billy joel or prins when he was alive. they clap, come back out, do another song that's even better? i suspect tonight he's going to do something that's actually outstanding. >> tucker: adam schiff, i love you! excuse me. robbie sauve is the author of "panic attacks" and a senior editor at "reason." always happy to have robbie's with us. >> i'm too overtaken by this emotional, powerful moment to properly discuss with you. >> tucker: let's pull back a little bit. as you age, you become an adult and the middle-aged adult. a lot of things you can't hold onto for your hair, your health. but your dignity is something you want to retain as you age but were they so eager to give it away on live tv? >> for them, this is -- so the comments are focused on the performance aspect of what schiff had to say because for them, them being the kind

it's all hinging on one schiff.stently and constantly i held up my right hand to swear impartial justice. that's what i believe i have to do. why would you then argue you don't want to see more information? think about what lindsey graham said in 1999, i want the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. i think that's the least we can expect. >> would it not be better for president trump if there was a more thorough, more vigorous trial, that democrats would not be able to call a coverup? you know what i'm saying, if he's acquitted after a trial with more. >> listen, ultimately again, everybody acknowledges, this isn't a court procedure. the civil rules of procedure don't apply here. this is a political process. politics. no one around this table doesn't know that. right that's what this is all about at the end of the day, process. mia makes the point correctly. pat cipollone made it yesterday, very forcefully, what adam schiff is trying to do is take this president, undue the past election. he said, i felt

emotional. >> adam schiff last night in emotional comments. >> democratic prosecutor adam schiff withn emotional appeal. >> you had a powerfully emotional, direct statement. >> making this emotional plea to end the session. >> his emotional appeal to a sense of what's right, to a sense of what is right for the country. >> i tucker: no matter how many segments we do on how dumb they are on cable news and every night we do one, it still shocking just how dumb. how dumb? here's one cnn analyst comparing adam schiff -- adam schiff to a rock star. >> performance every single day, performances both from a substantive and presentation level have been amazing. >> it's like springsteen or billy joel or prince when he was alive. they clap, come back out, do another song that's even better? i suspectt tonight he's going to do something that's actually outstanding. >> tucker: adam schiff, i love you!ou excuse me. robbie sauve is the author of "panic attacks" and a senior editor at "reason." always happy to have robbie with us. hey, robbie. >> i'm too overtaken by this emotional, powerful moment t

schiff seems happy, and why wouldn't he be?he opposite.ea he was rewarded. that's a washington really works. keep that in mind as you watch adam schiff strut around the center this week playing whatever character he's chosen that day. g this is the guy making the big decisions. this is the guy they admire. kim strassel is someone we admire, "the wall street journal" editorial board, she swallowed it since day one, thanks so much for coming on. let me ask the question i've kasked every night this week, what is the point of this exactly? >> [laughs] i think it is to allow adam schiff to spread more falsehoods to the country. i mean, look, you just mentioned the collusion one. he's been doing the same thing again this week, repeating ad infinitum how many times -- i can't even tell you at this point, saying well, the president was installed by russia into his seat. russiahe won him this election. he cheated his way into this. there is simply no evidence for that anywhere. you won't find it in the mueller report, you won't find it

and literally looking over at schiff and schiff said yes.f schiff made his case, why do you need more witnesses, especially when sekulow pointed out, oh, and by the way, we will call the whistle-blower. we will call adam schiff. we'll call joe and hunter biden. his is going to go on and on for months or we all know the president didn't commit a crime. the president did a great job of standing up with ukraine against russia one barack obama wouldn't do that. barack obama never sold them the javelin missiles. anyway, president trump did his job. it was great being with the president yesterday. >> sean: doesn't end tomorrow or saturday? are you convinced this ends quick? >> time. it's time for this to end. it's time for the senate to get back to doing their job. >> sean: will they do their job? will the republicans in the senate get this done? >> i think the senate will get it right, get it done. >> sean: let me ask. congressman van drew, you were in the democratic caucus with nancy pelosi. you were there for a lot of this hatred. i don't see t

or is that adam schiff overreacting.unds of shim on the weekend shows complaining about the big ole * threat. he was all sort of weekend shows telling "meet the press" how awful this was and the president was threatening him. joining me right now is indiana congressman jim banks. history won't take kindly to him. >> election day is not going to be kind to adam schiff and house democrats either, i believe. the evidence for that is growing day by day. as the american people see this process for what it is. that's the ultimate price that adam schiff will pay. adam schiff should pay a bigger price for the hell and the mud he has drug this country through during the past year. if that is a threat, then adam schiff can take it that way. but the american voters will pay the price on election day. >> i would like to know where adam schiff was when the republicans were getting those threats. those were threats when kirstjen nielsen was getting kicked out of a mexican restaurant because there was a group chanting at her. you have

and then that ending by adam schiff. you know, you want to leave them with the punch, and he gave a great punch. i do have to correct one thing i said earlier. i said bryant and a cloud of dust, that was woody hayes. >> both of them wore hats. >> i have a block of woody hayes. he coaches for a school in ohio. >> your guy is michigan. okay. >> give woody his due. >> claire, i hate to end on a negative, but i want you to react to what marsha blackburn tweeted tonight. adam schiff is hailing alexander vindman as an american patriot. how patriotic is it to bad mouth and ridicule our great nation in front of russia, america's greatest enemy? >> okay, senator blackburn, i think you meant to criticize donald trump in that tweet because my recollection is he stood up next to putin and basically said, i believe this guy more than i believe american intelligence that is full of veterans and active military risking their lives around the world to keep us safe. so don't you lecture anybody about how patriotic a veteran like vindman

about access to schiff.are these guys who were under the gun and have a lot to keep track of going to makes mistakes? yes. >> mister z, look like this was not zelinski. there are other things parnas have said that i asked giuliani about and he wouldn't answer the questions, he did answer the one about bob barr, william barr, that is -- never even had a conversation with william barr. he was adamant about that but wouldn't talk about -- >> if donald trump really care about corruption in ukraine everything john talked about he would have brought up with whoever the head of ukraine was in 2017 and he would have brought up corruption rather than something looking for an announcement of an investigation. >> the president ran on stopping -- he ran on gravy train and said nato has got to pony up more money, that was the first part of the call, what a wild hour, great to have you one, we will be back tomorrow night, full coverage of the impeachment trial. shannon bream, take it from here. >> the president relies on

adam schiff spoke multiple false alerts today, chris wallace called him out. what are our panelists saying? through the at&t network, edge-to-edge intelligence gives you the power to see every corner of your growing business. from using feedback to innovate... to introducing products faster... to managing website inventory... and network bandwidth. giving you a nice big edge over your competition. that's the power of edge-to-edge intelligence. they work together doing important stuff. the hitch? like you, your cells get hungry. feed them... with centrum® micronutrients. restoring your awesome... daily. feed your cells with centrum® micronutrients today. feed your cells with because the tempur-breeze™makes stransfers heat. away from your body. so you feel cool, night after night. and now tempur-pedic is ranked number one by jd power in customer satisfaction with retail mattresses. wean air force veteran made of doing what's right,. not what's easy. so when a hailstorm hit, usaa reached out before he could even inspect the damage. that's how you do it right. usa

schiff. >> thank you. senators, i will be brief but i do want to respond to a couple of points that my colleagues have made. first is the argument that you've heard before, and i have no doubt you will hear again, that this subpoenas issue by the house are invalid. well, that is really wonderful. i imagine when you issue subpoenas they will declare yours invalid as well. what is the basis of the claim they were invalid? because they weren't issued the way the president wants. part of the argument is you have to issue a subpoena the way we say, and that can only be done after there is a resolution that we approve of, adopted by the full house. first they can claim there was no resolution, no formal resolution of the impeachment inquiry and then when we pass the formal resolution, they complained about that. they complain when we didn't have one and when we did have one. they made that argument already in chorus and they lost. they similarly argued this subpoena for mr. mcgann is invalid, and you know what t

>> i think it's intended to be. >> the president called schiff corrupt adding schiff has not paid theme chris lu and susan del percia and rick tyler. this is somewhat chilling. susan, given all the campaigns you have worked on, politicians you have worked for, i'm curious your take. >> i think it's a reflection of himself than adam schiff. this is where the trump team and the white house, his managers, his defense are all so nervous is when donald trump is in this state. he tends to always go too far. they just don't know what he's going to say next. he would obviously be better off not doing anything and letting his attorneys make the case for him. but he is no normal, ordinary politician. >> i'm going to have to follow up that statement with this question to you, chris. why do you think he is lashing out at the lead house impeachment manager? is that a good strategy when he is the one on trial this week? >> it's actually a terrible strategy. when you look at his mob-style language during the scandal. do us a favor, she's going go through some things, take her out, and now pay the pr

of that schiff can be assured.oining us, run can party chair one -- republican party chairwoman, ronna mcdaniel. the theater is lost on me. i find them boorish, i find them dishonest -- i am talking about the democratic managers -- and i see no reason to watch it or listen to it. i have had a belly full of lies. >> you said it, lou. schiff's lies have no bounds. he started with the russia hoax, then he went to the ukraine sham. their impeachment is in shambles. the american people are smarter than that. this all about partisan politics. and you are right. nobody is watching. i was on a plane the other day, nobody was watching. not a single person. they note outcome. the president d they know the outcome. this president is not going to be impeached and he will get reelected. lou: our ratings are very high for both the fox news channel and fox business. i understand the fascination with the process. but to watch continuously what is just lie after lie, and the national left' wing media continues to give credence to a