of science. they take the minimum science they can, and it's unfortunate because those are future voting citizens and the general public out there doesn't have the highest attitude about science as well. it's unfortunate because everyday i world becomes more scientifically and technologically-based. a lot of the decisions we make need some understanding of science we can make an informed decision. scientists disagree a lot. this gets portrayed in newspapers on tv, and the public very often asked react and make decisions about their personal life, what they eat and what they do and what's right for the environment. and so science is critical when we like it or not, and my emphasis has always been on the public's understanding of how science works and what applications it has with the knowledge that those are signs textbooks and besides we hear about every day. if you go to washington, d.c. on the rotund and the national academy of sciences, there is a saying they are, what's on that ceiling is one

of science. in the end gss, nature of science has the different components.one is that all scientific investigation use a variety of methods, not just one. one major misconception in the world is that all scientific investigations are one set sequence of events known as the scientific method but the reality is a misrepresentation of science. scientific knowledge is based onempirical evidence, scientists collect data from the empirical world , numbers or descriptions. empirical just means observations of the natural world. knowledge is open to revision in light of new evidence, but no scientific evidence is absolute, it changes. there are many examples of that. we used the think the world was flat, now we don't. but there are many other more subtle examples where the knowledge of science has changed. up until 1956, and i just did this week ago, we used the belief that human beings had 48 chromosomes. and i just found out that i was reading an old science textbook from 1929 that was used in the new

in reality that is a misrepresentation of science. science.fic knowledge is based on vehicle evidence. scientists collect data from the empirical world. it could be numbers or descriptions. empirical just means observations of the natural world. the knowledge and revision in light of new knowledge is no scientific knowledge is absolute. it changes. there are many examples of that. we used to think the earth was flat, now we do not. there are many other more subtle examples where the knowledge of science has changed. up until 1956 and i just knew this a week ago we used to believe that human beings have 40e chromosomes. i just found that because i was reading an old science textbook over 1929 in the school system and we had 48 chromosomes. and what was that about? we are all born and raised that there is a 46 chromosomes. but it wasn't until 1956 where it change from the idea that there was 48 and now their 46. because of the advancement in technology and to be able to identify and count the chromosomes. sometimes technology is not involved eff

or historians of science ever. i thought what i would do was read a brief statement, some of you know corey, a writer of science fiction, a blogger, i thought what he had to say about james was incredibly insightful for those who have read some of james's work. i was also given strict instructions to keep my introduction to a minute and this will just about perfectly do it. james glieck is one of the great science writers of all time and that is in part because he is a science biographer. not a biographer of scientists, sciences, mathematicians, writers and thinkers, a biographer of the idea itself. >> it ricochets off disciplines, institutions and people, knocking them into new hire orbits and setting them on collision courses. i would like to present james glieck, winner of many awards, prizes, etc. he will give an absolutely wonderful lecture. >> thank you. >> thank you for coming. this did not come from me. i would be happy to have him go on and on. welcome, people of the future. time travel is our great modern

in fiction and in science.y have the genre of alternative history in which you imagine what if roosevelt had been assassinated. and as a result of that the nazis in the japanese have won world war ii. that's the man in the high castle. unless cited fictional the plot against america which is one of my favorite books it's unfortunate that it seems to be coming true. i know some of you are thinking that. the idea of multiple universes even argue at least first appear in fiction. this happens to be the first story ever to be published in english and guess what literary journal published that. it lays out in beautiful prose the notion of multiple universes in the unit notion that has now entered into science in the form of the many world interpretation. essentially any quantum event is to be understood as a forking path. on the other universe the cat is alive. it solves the problem for not being able to decide whether it's dead or alive. it is both alive and dead at the same time. they don't like to do. in your que

but who also really love science. we can do it. we're doing it it's just a matter of dean able to see the role models as up. i think my advice to all young people and all people in general is that if you have a dream or something that you are really passionate about, go for it. no matter what. you can do it. you might have to work harder or take a detour but you can do it. i think working hard towards that, the end goal in dream and the passion is what makes your life worthwhile.>> [ speaking >>> it's time to go "on the record" with wral news. >>> good evening. finally, we are just days away from the election. early voting in north carolina and across the country has been heavy. and indicator of the intense interest in this election year. as of thursday more than 2.2 million people have taken the time to vote early in north carolina. many have voted in the ce the latest wral news survey usa poll released on tuesday shows incumbent richard burr opening up a six point lead over his democratic challenger deborah ross. libertarian sean

the science.while i have been briefed on it, it is my scientists that will make these decisions. >> let's talk about one of those disagreements, the consideration of a widespread impact. what do you consider the impact -- definition of widespread impact, and what impacts does the epa fined acceptable, and why? >> you are asking the same questions that many of the questions in the science advisory board revolved around. the purpose of the hydra fracking study, we were asked to do this and told to do this. the purpose of it was basically to identify -- look at the water cycle and identify what point in the water cycle, and in the hydro fracking operation, could pose a risk to drinking water. it was very clearly done in a way that it was just a science and technical document about what does the data show us, and what do we know. though the challenge for us is to characterize what we know and to make sure that is not over characterized, that we know everything. our data is limited. how we project that

report >> -- >> reporter: we are at the science lab and we are going to bu director of the arizona science lab. we are in the middle of the rocket workshop talking about the science of rocketry and we are applying that science and helping them to build the best rocket they can build. >> i am going to build a test machine rocket. >> the rocket itself is a two liter soda bottle the rest of this is a paper plate and pieces of part -- cardboard for the fence and then tape to hold i was fortunate to have been one of the engineers who actually worked on the first portable cell phone. >> my name is roy i was an aerospace engineer at honeywell. >> i have developed computer software and we built this science lab. >> we are all volunteers. nothingness. we are -- we have a few sponsors. >> they come on a valley we do rocket ships and solar cars and sailboats. >> it does not matter about speed matters how high it goes and how straight it comes down. >> they go from 0 to 100 miles per hour in about 2/10 of a second. >> we are a bunch of little boys when it comes to building this stuff. we call it the w

by the 60s then science-fiction had taken off. imagine going into a barnes and noble with a huge science-fiction section that wouldn't have been his childhood for example. >> you would think he hated the technology or at least he said so but he didn't have a car though he had no problem with the train or flying that he always made students drive him to the airport even when he taught here at hillsdale they would have to drive him back. it was about two and a half hours, so that is five hours to come down and go back up plus the student would have to go back so that even more than that. a huge part of his income came from colleges and speaking so he was gone most half the year he would be traveling every year until his health was bad. he had a number of positions that he would normally do them a semester. places like the university of chicago offered him three times professorship that over and over he said no. >> if one says they are a kirkian what does that mean? >> i don't think that is a proper title. he was a conformist and tha

. >> in science, particularly brain science, we want to understand how the human mind works, what could be more central. in art, we want to understand how people respond to works about how the imagination works, how we can stimulate the imagination. one to have the things that are pleasing to people, those are really important questions. what enriches your life. >> veterans, leonard cohen and eric kandel coming up. >> rose: funding for "charlie rose" has been provided by the following: >> and by bloomberg, a provider of multimedia news and information services worldwide. captioning sponsored by rose communications from our studios in new york city, this is charlie rose. >> the war in iraq has claimed the lives of more than 2800 american troops. on this program we've talked about the war from many perspectives, journalists, generous, politicians and authors debated the reason we went to war, talked about the policy, strategy, the idea of the future years' involvement in iraq. joke me are three men who served in the u.s. military in iraq a. paul rieckhoff, author of chasing ghost a soldie

[laughter] to believe or not believe in science. and the fact that it's -- >> yes.use] >> and i, on the day when they announced this major discovery which, you know, it's hard to understand what it, even if we talked about just the science of it for an hour, it's hard to understand. but for 24 hours, it felt like the world stood still. to look up at the sky and to, like, have some feeling of recognition that we're all under the same sky. i was doing interviews on al-jazeera tv with an interviewer in qatar, and there was this moment of we're taking a pause to acknowledge that this is global and worldwide. and there's something that's exactly what it is about science that got me into it in the first place, that it is transcendent. it doesn't matter where you're from or what language you speak or what era it is. >> and the it's so important to more of that transcendence because people, as you say, have a hard time understanding something you can't pinpoint what it's going to be used for -- >> right. >> -- and you make this enormous, elegant case. but in a way i was thi

the science. while i have been briefed on it, it is my scientists that will make these decisions. >> let's talk about one of those disagreements, the consideration of a widespread impact. what do you consider the impact -- definition of widespread impact, and what impacts does the epa fined acceptable, and why? >> you are asking the same questions that many of the questions in the science advisory board revolved around. the purpose of the hydra fracking study, we were asked to do this and told to do this. the purpose of it was basically to identify -- look at the water cycle and identify what point in the water cycle, and in the hydro fracking operation, could pose a risk to drinking water. it was very clearly done in a way that it was just a science and technical document about what does the data show us, and what do we know. though the challenge for us is to characterize what we know and to make sure that is not over characterized, that we know everything. our data is limited. how we project tha

eric: in science, particularly brain science, we want to understand how the human mind works. we want to understand how people respond to works of how their imagination works, how we can stimulate the imagination, what are the things pleasing to people. those are important questions. what enriches your life? charlie: let us take a look. let's go through them. the first one, take a look. eric: i love this. this next sequence really outlines the wall task before us. turner was interested in ship that the and how they confronted the natural forces, the storm at sea, the clouds, the waves, these shifts struggling in order to handle themselves in those circumstances. this is a very figurative, beautifully detailed depiction. he now returned to this theme 40 years later and he has done away with much of the detail, and you can barely recognize the fact that it is a ship because you see the mast and you see a lot of the details gone, but you still see the ships struggling against the force of nature, against the waves, against the sky, and in some ways, because it leaves more to your

eric: in science, particular brain science, we want to understand how the human mind works.t, we want to understand how people respond to works of art, how the imagination works, how we should stimulate the imagination. one of -- what are the things that are pleasing to people? those are the important questions. charlie: i want to take a look at some slides. this is a turner. eric: i love this turner. this next sequence really outlines the whole task before us. turner was interested in ships at sea and how they confronted the natural forces, the storm at sea, the clouds, the waves, and these ships struggling to handle themselves under the circumstances. and this is a very figurative, beautifully detailed depiction. we now return to this theme four years later, and he has done away with much of the detail. you barely recognize that it is a ship because you see the mast and see that a lot of the detail is gone, but you still see that the strip -- ship is struggling against the forces of nature, and in some ways because it leaves more to your imagination, it affects you more po

that's the part they like. >> what would a science festival be without a little science fiction. this one doesn't travel through time it does travel on its own. no need for a driver. >> we really try to make cars safer. and one thing we focus on is trying to handle extreme scenarios. drifting is a good way to study that. >> organizers say the fair is bigger and greater than ever and they're making plans for next year in san francisco christien christien ktvu fox 2 news. >> how cool. the big question tonight is will those skies last for the rest of the weekend. >>> a weak system moving in for tonight that could produce showers. not a major event but enough to possibly wet the roadways late tonight and into tomorrow morning. you can see on the satellite, the first thing i noticed is the front moving into the north coast. it's being stretched in this direction here and to the north and south. with that the energy is weakening quite a bit. as a result we're not expecting significant rainfall here in the bay area. a closer look. see the doppler sweeps from the clouds weeping in and so

((john tuman/chair, unlv political science dept. "i think it's hard to say how president-elect donald trump will proceed.")) ((patrick walker)) u-n-l-v political science department chairman john tuman says that is anybody's guess. ((john tuman/chair, unlv political science dept.: "i would caution about generalizing what his policies might be simply of the basis of some tweets and also some things he may have said on the campaign trail when he was trying to win the ((paul joncich)) >> efforts to repeal and replace the affordable care act... and ending common core... would require congressional approval. that's because both are the result of laws that were passed by congress./// ((christianne klein)) >>> the somali-born student who attacked a group of people at the ohio state university with his car and a knife seemed to warn about his intentions beforehand on facebook. brook silva-braga is columbus, ohio... where the first of 11 victims is speaking out about the attack. clark is still slow on his feet after getting hit by a car on th

here we are the great lakes science center previewing lessons of science into thanksgivingto dinner. that is right. a three leaf printer this is one of our three d printers. one of the activities you can participate in if you come the 25th and 26. the friday and saturday after thanksgiving this is an example where you can immerse yourself in as little as much time as you want to. l and this is are capable of printing so many different things. we have a ranch. we have this really something printed and then you have the state of ohio. come by. see how three d printers work we like it as an etch-a-sketch because it works on the ask them out why. but also it also works up and down and that is how it gets these steps. exactly.g the three d website you can find out all the information will my eggs survive? kicking it with kenny all in to the number one care in ohio. cleveland clinic is here for you, anytime, anywhere. the cadillac xt5... what should we do? ...tailored to you. wait it out. equipped with apple carplay compatibility. ?? now during season's best, get this low mileage lease on

the science. while i have been briefed on it it is my scientist that will make these decisions. >> what. >> what is the consideration of a widespread impact? what consider the definition of widespread impacts, which impacts do they find accessible and why? >> you're asking the same question that i think many and much of the discussion of science advisory board revolved around. the purpose of the hydro- fracking study was we were asked to do this and told to do this and the purpose of it was basically to identify basically look at the water cycle and identify what point in that water cycle and in the hydro- fracking operation could pose a risk to drinking water. was very clearly done in a way that was a science and technical document about what is the data shows that what we know. so the challenge for us is to characterize what we know and to make sure that is not over characterized as we know everything because our data is limited and how we project that and clarify that in this report is what we

the science lab. bridge to science lab. ensign mulchaey, respond. harry. commander, the force field has a borg signature. red alert. captain to the bridge. tuvok, take a security team to the science lab. chakotay to seven of nine, you were right. we've detected borg on the ship-- deck eight, science lab. how many drones? unknown. tuvok's headed there now. i will join him. the science lab? my mobile emitter's in there. this technology resembles a borg maturation chamber ard: commander! he was punctured by an extraction tubule. it removed a tissue sample. there are residual nanoprobes surrounding the wound. their encoding sequences are identical to my own. your nanoprobes? how? i don't know. take him to sick bay. what are you doing? a drone... but unlike any i've ever seen. it appears to be in the fetal stage. i don't understand. hey, man you okay? yeah, just a little shook up. this car...for a second, i thought it could be sue's. same make, model, same color, same year even. i see what you mean. i've been thinking about it all morning... i mean, what if som

and a lot of physics are a lot of science in thist sport. we have a baseball and theand science center from nass i used in the first pitch thatts flew n the shuttle columbia 1995. got it on display the rest of the week.ot it a little help. lit you want toe grab that over he. thank you very much.ra your predictions your predictions your scientific predictionsns . we have got one. you need that it is collectible. your scientific predictions for the game tonight. what do you think? we've got best. all the way. tribe all the way. we've gotal w this going. nothing is evening cleveland the had to set up the drama. excellent. real quickly what the do you gus families? i showcased one of your record exhibits.e it is still open you can see that in coming upti next special programming is n turkey. friday and saturday afterafte thanksgiving it is awesome. going to be a lot of fun. right after thanksgiving. you guys were awesome thank you for the experiment tha with thet and everything that they also.. the rain is helping to wash away the watermelon jui

scientific explorer my first mind blowing science kit. it's for children ages 6 and up and it's $10. microscope, a great idea this one connect to a tv for big screen exploration. it's a bigger investment at $130. >> it's a great tool and it will grow along with the child. >>reporter: a few additional tips from anthony at mosi read product product reviews learn you're overwhelmed visit a science center for a quick refresher. >> thank oppler at this time. protecting the first family outside the white house is not always cheap. coming up we'll tell you how much the secret service could be shelling out to stand watch over trump tower when the president visits the big apple the dow gained nearly 68 points, the s & p 500 was up more than 8 points. the nasdaq child 18 points overall. >>> just when you made it through black friday amazon has already rolled out its cyber monday deems. more than 75,000 items are going to be get there, 50-inch led tvs for $149. amazon's echo speaker last year cyber monday purchases topped more than 54 million items.

will turn its back on science and be left behind. that is the choice that we face. as the president said, the inevitability of our clean energy future is again bigger than any one person or nation and must be guided by a simple but profound truth. we don't have to choose between the economy or environment. folks, we can and must choose both. the truth has been the foundation of all of the progress that we have made at epa. this truth. we have a track record to show for it. over the past eight years, under president obama's leadership, we have taken tremendous strides forward in economic growth. eight years of economic expansion and a record increase in median incomes. at the same time, we have made incredible progress in cutting pollution and protecting public health. and at the same time, this president has understood and stood up and said so clearly that a clean, healthy environment is not a luxury, it is not windowdressing. it is a right. it is the foundation of our economy and our lives. our work to cut pollution must always focus not only on what the nation nee

karen: 18% of bachelor degrees in computer science went to women in 2014. women held 29% of computer and method jobs, slightly above the national average of 25%. this will bring few houses about. >> it's about breaking barriers. we are working with some of the tech companies and the area. also enc and with trip advisor, one fire inc. supporters. -- one of our big supporters. it's about working with those 21st century companies. karen: to train kids like tonya things that brooke view house does to keep families not only out of poverty. that's the most important. thank you so much for being here today. you can learn more about everyone we featured on a program by logging onto our page at wcvb.com. be sure to follow us on social media. thank you for watching. have a great rest of your day. take care. c'mon in, pop pop! happy birthday! i survived a heart attack. i'm doing all i can to keep from having another one. and i'm taking brilinta. for people who've been hospitalized for a heart attack. as it affects how well it works. brilinta helps keep my platelets fr

that's one and if we look at some of the stickers on science and if we look at climate change issue asan example is the science that's true for some of his supporters. >> he doesn't believe in climate change. >> i think from a scientific level as other should flag the globalization to. there is a lot of concern globally and i also think some of the focus on the case to. part of it was is taking half a step back on that but i feel like in terms of her capital funding particular for some smaller companies i work with any of these major changes aca is hugely deceptive. it has tremendous uncertainty and i worry about some of the proposals in that context and what that will mean for financing and keeping the industry going in a robust way. the jury is out for me. i won't say it won't be terror world is coming to an end by any means. it will be important to see what comes forward through this transition team in terms of who his top political appointees will be, what proposals will come out and we also need to watch what happens in congress. i do think i have a number of concerns but i'm not

election, the future of government support for science is less certain.sident-elect donald trump hasn't yet laid out his plans, but the scientific community is nervous, suggesting trump may be america's first anti science president from his positions on to himmics from climate change to vaccines and citing tweets like this one from the height of the 2014 ebola outbreak, suggesting aid workers shouldn't be allowed back to the u.s. but in new york today, researchers expressed hope the new administration will be supportive of science. >> biomedical science has never been a partisan issue. >> reporter: the annual conference run by businessman mike milken's aims to bring industry, nonprofits and others together to accelerate research into cures. >> we're in the golden age of science where we can provide personalized and pre-session medicine to everyone. >> reporter: the transition comes at a time funding for science already has been tight. >> we lived through a very tough period from 2003 to 2015, and lost more than 20% of its purchasing power based on flat bu

we made a very earnest effort to find out the science is the science. as a journalist, we are giving you what we have got. we cannot control the outcome. this is what the science tells us, and i think it only deepens the mystery into who killed bob crane. we are going to continue this discussion tonight on our youtube channel, fox 10 news now. you love all-day breakfast. i love all-day breakfast. but you don't love that you can't get all your favorites all day. i don't love that. but now you're gonna love that you can get more all day. like mcgriddles. i love mcgriddles... so you'll have to find something else to not love. hey buddy! like exploding fist bumps. pggggggghew! or forgetting what you're about to do. wait...what was i about to do? or when people who say you look like... james lipton. oh man...it's uncanny. >>> fox 10 news at 10:00 starts now. >>> hello, i'm marc martinez. coming up on fox 10 news at 10:00, the close community of show low in morning tonight as it says good-bye to an officer and friend killed in the line of duty. and chaos and

science doesn't happen in one-year cycles. science cycle times are four, five, six years.o be able to know you're on a pathway where there's going to be an opportunity for people to propose and get funded to do some high risk research, that's what we need. that's what the young scientists, in particular, are looking for. that's what i think we have begun to see a real optimistic turn of events that ought to encourage people to come on board. that's certainly the most thing i'm concerned about as nih director, to keep that momentum going. >> as francis has stated here, if you went to one of our research conferences 30 years ago, you would find primarily those molecular biologists and mds today at these conferences, you have physicists, ethicists, computer scientists, mathematicians. >> robotic experts. >> robotic experts and engineering and many of our engineering schools today, the number one path they choose is biological engineering. so we know the future is related biology. we have 3d printers that can print biological things. if i'm going to go invest what would be hal

i don't need nobody shoving monkey science down my throat. "where two or three are gathered together in my name there am i in the midid of them." what's your name? cameron crawford. tom halstrom. crawford. you related to... he's my fatherer stood up to mr. garner today. he's speaking at the church meeting tonight. are you going to go? my father would drag me there even i ii didn't want to. how about you, tom? oh, yes. wouldn't miss it. miracles don't come very often. most of us never witness one. we accept the truth of god's mirirles e miracle of his kindness. a lot of you have come from different churches to rejoice in our miracle. i'll ask brother james and his son cameron to step up. every day, every man, woman and child among us some of them are reasonable. they help us to get along with our fellow man. some are not so reasonable. but we say to ourselves it keeps the peace. so be it. and sometimes, to keep the peace we compromise the word of god. never, brother. sad but true, brother. but what happens when we compromise god's truth? hell,

, my first mind blowing science kit. it's for children ages 6 and up and it's $10. mike scopes are a great idea. this one connects big screen exploration. it's bigger investment at $130. >> it's a great tool and it will grow along with the child. >>reporter: a few additional tips from anthony at mosi read product reviews learn how to use the toys and if you're overwhelmed visit a science center like mosi for a quick refresher. >> that's a thinker. that's stuff that makes you think right there. that's embarrassing. i have actually gotten things. i don't know how to put this stuff together. >> meantime a teddy bear can make a bad situation a whole lot better. >> that's exactly the idea behind the rough you ride earth john winter teddy bear roundup. jeff patterson joins us live from tampa with more on this exciting event. >>reporter: good evening i am with my rough rider buddies and they are spending a lot of time december 19th collecting teddy bears that they take to people all year long none would be possible without the

and science is at the base of this pyramid. without the curiosity that leads to the discovery of information and without the people who are able to draw knowledge out of that information and the communicators who are able to transmute that into wisdom, we would be primitive. and so i think making sure that this is understood, that it's inseparable and that language and science together are how we move through that hierarchy of understanding, that's really important. >> i would also just responding to that say that it's just very sad to take away from one to think that that's the way to do it to give to the other. it's like people who only have bread and water and saying we can give you more bread, but you can't have any water. and the fight shouldn't be between two essential aspects of human development, it should be that those aren't the two things that should be competing with each other for funding. so it's just very sad that one is coming at the expense of the other. >> thank you. [applause] >> so how common an event is thi

science and this time around we got a result. we got a result. tonight, for for first time we're revealing those results to the world. the d.n.a. found on the door of the test picked up two d.n.a. profiles, a major contributor is from a man, whose identity is unknown. second profile is a partial profile oo degraded to reach any conclusions. this is an explosive development. i think we went into this expecting this was going to come back john carpenter as the guilty man. bob c father's car. case closed. >> shocking. >> reporter: what do you make of this? >> i'm shocked right now. there were always two people in my mind, john carpenter or my stepmother for different reasons. it was on john's car. >> i think we're all frankly stunned. steve in oakland tonight, you have said from the beginning your client did not kill bob crane. >> the reason i said that is i took an objective view of the evidence that we had at that time. i knew my cline and i stated from day one that he did not kill bob crane. this is wonderful news for his family. this is wonderfu

statements on science and if we look at climate change or example, he is quite dismissive of science. that's true for some of his supporters. >> he doesn't believe in climate change. >> i think from a scientific level we have passed that debate. there is a lot of concern globally, and i also think some of the focus on replacing the aca part of it was is taking , half a step back on that but i feel like in terms of fundraising and venture capital funding particular for some , smaller companies i work with any of these major changes aca and other areas is usually disruptive. adds tremendous uncertainty and i worry about some of the proposals in that context and what that will mean for financing and keeping the industry going in a robust way. the jury is out for me. i won't say it won't be terror -- terrible and the world is coming to an end by any means. it will be important to see what comes forward through this transition team, in terms of who his top political appointees will be, what proposals will come out and we also need to watch what happens in congress. that is a long way of sa

we can study that through science. we've come to understand you been that there is a universal human experience of death. it doesn't matter where we come from, japan, china, africa. there is an absolutely universal experience of death that is by and e people describe the sensation of being very peaceful. pain-free. sometimes describe seeing relatives. sometimes welcoming them. a lot of them will describe having experienced everything that they had done and said. if they'd heard -- hurt others, they feel that exact pain and they themselves become the judge of their own actions. and this is all through soigs. dr. oz: we polled our audience. when we asked all of you to describing death in one word, you know what they said? scary and painful. which i guess most of us, if we do ever think about death would come to the belief that it might be scary and painful. but you mention that main -- pain is not a big issue of these universal has had all over the world. >> i don't call them near-death experiences so the people we studi

eric: i am most interested in climate change and science.ce is what has gotten us to this point, and so my philanthropy has been focused on the underlying issues around environmental causes, philanthropy and oceanography. oceanography is interesting because there is almost no private philanthropy in it and yet there is a mass extinction going on in the ocean where we are losing most of the current lifeforms. 70% of the world's humans are dependent on fish for daily food. all of the carbon we put into the air goes into the ocean, so even small changes in how the ocean works could have debilitating impacts on society. david: what would you like to do in the next 10 years and what would you hopefully like to have as your legacy? eric: hopefully i do not need to answer the legacy question any time soon, but from my perspective what i'm doing now is the most interesting. i do not want to work in any government. i have seen government up close enough to know that i'm not a government person but i would like to make sure that the governments around

to be a climate denier in 2016 is to simply ignore science. a business man is supposed to be flexible and thoughtful about opportunity to step clean energy is an economic boom and a boom for equity around the planet. to turn your back on that is to put ideology over simple, good, clean energy business and clean energy jobs. , you're looking at the u.s. from the vantage point -- well, we're in morocco -- but from britain, where you live. we discussed this briefly yesterday that one of the first world leaders that donald trump, the president-elect, met with at his penthouse, trump tower, was nigel farage, the man who pushed for brexit. can you talk about the significance of this? right now there's just a plan leaked out of the british government that says britain, even with the conservative prime minister, is not going to be ready to leave the european union for many months. but the significance of trump's meeting? >> first of all, for many environmentalists and people who cared about justice within the u.k., we thought she wrongly for the u.k.

what has that told you as a professor of political science? >> i've been teaching about this for years. you say this is a hypothetical possibility that in the 1800s this happened a number of times, right? that it's a hypothetical possibility, you could conceivably have this but it's been over 100 years that this happened. it's not something that resonates with people. then after 2000, there was a lot of talk, that people might want to change the electoral college. george bush got he elected, having half a million fewer votes than al gore. this is a lightning shot, really unlikely, something that hasn't happened for 100 years, maybe wouldn't hab for 100 more years and the country moved on and people forgot about it. this is twice in 16 years and more importantly it is twice in 16 years with the same party benefiting. >> let's talk about legitimacy, when this happened to rutherford b. hayes and it was decided in congress under political circumstances that he would be president, he was referred to as be fraud b. hayes. is this system almost unfai

freelance science writer. thank you all. [applause] epa administrator jackson of our -- gina mccarthy was last at this podium in september 2013 to unveil the obama administration's opening bid to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. those rules curb emissions from power plants, a precursor of the clean power plan issued in 2015, of which was designed to reduce carbon emissions are u.s. power -- from u.s. power plants 32% below 2005 levels by 2030. the clean power plan is america's chief commitment to the world in pursuit of achieving the paris accords goals to combat global warming. but the fate of that, as well as many others issued by the epa are uncertain following the election. president-elect donald trump has called climate change a hoax and has vowed to roll back federal regulations seen as crippling to u.s. businesses. during her tenure, mccarthy has been in the crosshairs of republican members of congress and the fossil fuel industry for her perceived leadership over the so-called war on coal. but if you ask her, mccarth

class at harvard which was crazy because there was no other humanities senior taking a computer science last it was really good. i got a good basis and when i came back home, i came to silicon valley and i was able to get a job and i have been there ever since. >> you were first marketing manager, you worked on google images and google books. you built the business best you built the ad business. when you join a startup you have to be willing to do whatever the startup need you to do. because i was that didn't have a fixed role at first i was always looking for the opportunity so it was like, there is an opportunity where no one else is working. there were all these other people working on the text search -- tech search. was really cool so i think doing lots of things and having the freedom to move around the company, there seem to be a lot of opportunities, then grow them. >> it has been 10 years since google bought youtube and you wrote the original justification plan that convinced larry and sergey to buy the company? >> i did a spreadsheet. i also believe in you to. there was this o

one of the placebo science i talked to. science can only go so far.ab. it is a very controlled and you know, you have these suggestions that are muted. and they have marks on the screen or you have been conditioned ten minutes to it feel a certain way. the placebos in the rest of our lives are complex and related to culture and bleechlt i was raised in christian science where belief and medicine are the same thing. and so that's where i approached this from. and when you look at it. and you are seeing healings. and obviously there are certain healings we can't explain. and especially pain and depression and anxiety and these are the world of placebo and parkinson disease. and autoimmune disorders and all of these things respond to our belief system. and you can see people looking for relief from say chronic pain and they are going to a homeopath. there is a lot that tracks as a relief from pain. and there is no reason we shouldn't for certain chronic pain is difficult to deal with and doctors have a hard time with it. and if you can find a pathway tha

we cannot afford to go one more day without making sure that computer sciences taught in every singled that every child learns how to code. later, we've taught 40,000 girls and we will teach 100,000 a year. we will continue to do the work and scale, but it will be helpful if both federal and state and local governments understood the magnitude of this need toand that we all start working on it now. emily: so many people talk about the problems in the pipeline and there's no doubt there are problems in the pipeline, but moretech companies be open-minded and open the pipeline and open jobs to people have thatnecessarily specific computer science degree, but could learn, or have a different kind of degree. where are you seeing the most resistance at the top when it comes to tech companies and employers, it all sounds great to say you are supporting women in tech, but what it really comes down to is how you are hiring. >> we are holding them accountable. and arere a tech ceo desperately looking to hire programmers, you may not care whether you are hiring women are people of color. you jus

. >> printing 3d hearts is not science fiction. how this technology is helping doctors save lives children's. here's what's happening on this thursday night. >>> the east valley grandma who accidentally invited a complete stranger to thanksgiving dinner made good on her offer today. this story went viral after that stranger and 17-year-old high school student posted the exchange on twitter. jamal has come to have thanksgiving dinner with us. >> reporter: it's the thanksgiving dinner of twitter's dreams. jamal and wanda strangers just a week ago. >> it hits my heart, from all the people out there that said the kindest things to me. >> i love being here. felt like we could connect more. and selfies ensued. >> it was not my grandma. and i sent her back to confirm i'm not her grandson, and jokingly asked for a plate >> reporter: people couldn't get enough. the people overwhelmingly supportive of making the dinner happen. >> i picture to a total stranger. >> reporter: hinton's family wasn't able to attend due to a scheduling conflict, a