and the actual closing of all projects , which is what scm declares - this will have serious , serious consequences for the market, which today there is, and you mentioned relocation to other countries, well, at least yesterday, i saw additional clarifications from scm, it doesn't seem to me that they will relocate, it seems to me that we are now gradually closing all media projects, although i don't know, let's see how the situation unfolds, diana. i understand that, once again, based on the clarification , all assets, except for the license, remain in the company's ownership, and the licenses are returned . accordingly, these licenses will probably be granted to other broadcasters, correctly, i understand, well, probably according to the rules, the national council of students of television and radio broadcasting should announce a competition for these frequencies. would apply to these frequencies now a large number of e-e regional tv channels first of all gave up their licenses because they e-e cannot speak through e-e the fact that they actually stopped operating - these are tv cha

he was forced to withdraw his investment company from km from the media business and as explained in scmu think about it, ms. yulia, how can we comment on the situation with the disappearance of akhmetov's channels from the information field, what are the risks? and is the country really awaiting a great de-oligarchization or should we expect that it will happen in the near future, you know, i will be happy if the country is awaiting a real oligarchization, but in reality, from what i see, we are fighting a dragon and we become dragons because as a result the fact that we are depriving the license of channels belonging to alternative owners rather than those channels that today broadcast our marathon constantly 24 hours a day, so we are thus depriving any alternative as of today and providing information from other sources, and this is scary because it can lead to a kind of small russia with uh, where we will once again speak only on the basis of the committed texts from those channels that everyone watches, because there is no one to watch anymore there is nothing, and accordingly, i th

and that is also the story with scm, she pointed out the fallacy of such a path, because you are alreadythe official e of the scm group regarding the possession of media assets directly from the license gave but this production all media activity and media activities all and even their own names issued which are ukraine 24 ukraine and today and so on . who do not like to be called oligarchs who really influence politics with the help of their e-e media assets here on the one hand the government is absolutely correct and the other question is what path did it take is not entirely effective, they will continue to try in any way to leave behind this influence, which turned out to be a big deal with the media group of ukraine, they will simply move smoothly to poland, where they will pay taxes. i have great doubts that akhmetov will completely abandon his media as a tool of influence to support, more precisely, its business and development and business. it is really a very powerful tool, which, at first glance, may seem like a big deal, although in reality money is earned by a big business t

in principle, they are in the same situation as the media group that belonged to rinat akhmetov 's scmdia, well, you can ask the media groups about it. i won’t make any guesses here, but clearly, the state should support content, content production. i’m not saying that it’s there to give out money to a certain number of channels, but support information mo the influence of information is necessary because we have an information market and we are talking not only about tv channels but also about internet sites. they also do not use, you know, large revenues from advertising, so society is protected because it is financed from the state budget, others are looking for grants, some remnants of some advertising and in my opinion , content financing will be needed if we want to win in the information war. and how should this happen? do you have some kind of model? that is, these are grants offered by the state or tenders. what should it be? well, i think that the system danced and the ukrainian cultural fund works, and it also issued grants for audiovisual products, but the issue now is fund

the media group of ukraine, we see that every year more than one billion hryvnias is invested by the scmreholder in this story . last year it was 1.2 billion, the year before last it was 7.2 billion this year several hundreds of millions and the shareholders of km rinat akhmetov get absolutely nothing from that. well, how is it nothing? well, maybe they talk about his charity projects in e-e on television during commercials even in marathon. i have seen such stories, there is such a thing. yes but this is not the same influence as it was before, that is, it had no influence on decision-making, had influence on the deputies, has no influence on any preferences and subsidies, yes, this influence is very limited, it is no longer worth the money that is there, remember that they suffered a little. akhmetov's business in ukraine suffered not a little, but a lot, because in my opinion this is a purely economic decision, which is wrapped very nicely in the envelope of oligarchy politics and an insult to the president, mr. mykhailo, in general, the media business can be profitable in us. there i

they remain the property of the oligarch, we also heard statements that er, scm and channels will workcan be sold will either be transported or sold. the question is what will happen to the media market in ukraine, what information and how will our citizens receive it, and are we really not moving? we are now in the direction of little russia, as i think it is impossible to defeat russia by trying to build a small copy of russia in ukraine, and i said it will not be possible. i apologize to the guests for the short conversation. the air alarm is sounding now . please come to the shelter oleksiy goncharenko, people's deputy of ukraine, what rea rudyk, people's deputy of ukraine were our guests, we will be back in a moment after a few informative messages from espresso, we will work live , the closing is very important in this difficult time to be aware of what is happening, we tell the news and help to understand the events, however, the war can make its adjustments in case the broadcast signal is lost, watch espresso on the satellite now espresso has become available immediately on on

us on the connection diana congratulations glory to ukraine good day glory to the heroes well, the scmmpany of the ukrainian e-businessman rinat akhmetova has started the procedures for terminating the issue served by the mass media and the cancellation of the licenses of the ukraine media group, in fact, many people were stunned by the news that rinat akhmetov is allegedly going to a meeting where is the oligarchization in our country, although he does not consider himself an oligarch and distances himself from the media business, but then began to emerge well, let's say , separate point understandings of what takes place in particular in the sense of relocation as far as we understand now maybe in

discussing the main media news this week is the departure of rinat akhmetov from the television market, his scmers announced that the richest ukrainian is giving the state all the licenses for all his broadcast and satellite channels in the past, you were the general news producer of the ukraine media group. in your opinion, until today, you worked and cooperated with the media group of ukraine , which has the largest audience and actually determines the information agenda on these channels. therefore, it is obvious that it is entirely from me. from the point of view, it is a completely logical step on the part of inat akhmetov, this is his personal statement and emphasizes my personal decisions, because in fact the owners of the channels that are participating in this single marathon marathon of unified news do not influence the information the politics of these channels, but they are forced to bear the costs of these channels as owners, which are actually, well, that is, opportunities, as a contribution to the fight against the enemy . in no way, that is, there is no way to keep these channel

not fall under the criteria after his business partner vadym novynskyi's parliamentary mandate and scm'sa business, novynskyi said the clam it was a direct connection in order to recognize the oligarch akhmetov because they are business partners and novynskyi, as a people's deputy, is a political figure and therefore here in the case of continuing the status of a daughter-in-law as a deputy, the signs of participation in political life would be activated, which would add and automatically turn akhmetov into an oligarch , therefore, in this case, from

defined by law for the sale of media, as well as russian aggression against ukraine, is not given scm'sability to sell media businesses on market terms, the advisor to the head of the president's office, mykhailo podolyak, called the decision of businessman rinatov akhmetov to withdraw his company from the media business a worthy example, according to him, the key feature of mature states is the obligation to comply with laws. regarding the situation in ukraine, in particular, the vice president between the parliamentary union, representatives of the general and national assemblies of uruguay, the republic of namibia and the apparatus of the state of israel, the republic of kazakhstan and indonesia, they saw the consequences of the occupation of kyiv region by the armed forces of the russian federation, the destruction of russian military equipment in dmytrivka, the mass burial of the killed civilian population in buch and the destruction of civilian quarters in irpen. the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, dmytro kuleba, made such an appeal to partners in response to the kremlin's

media group of ukraine then we see that every year more than a billion hryvnias is invested by the scmlder in this story. last year it was 1.2 billion, the year before last it was 7.2 billion, in general, this year it was already several hundred million. rinat akhmetov, a shareholder from km , receives absolutely nothing from that. well, it’s nothing. well, maybe they talk about his charitable projects on television during commercials, even in marathon. i saw such stories, there is such a thing. previously, that is, he had no influence on decision -making, no influence on the deputies, no influence on any preferences, subsidies, yes, it had a very limited effect, he is no longer worth the money that is there, remember that they suffered a little. actually, not a little , but a lot, business trainee akhmetov in for ukraine, as far as i am concerned, this is a purely economic decision, which is very well wrapped up in the politics of the oligarchs and an image of the president, mr. mykhailo , in general, the media business can be profitable in us, hmm, during the war, is there an adverti

and does not fall under the criteria after his business partner vadym novynskyi's deputy mandate and scm'sxit from the media business novinsky said, er, mollusk. it was a direct connection. in order to recognize the oligarch makhmetov , because they are business partners, and novinsky, as a people's deputy, is a political figure, and therefore , in the event of the continuation of english's status as a deputy, the signs of participation in to political life, which would add and automatically turn akhmetov into an oligarch, therefore, in this case, the refusal of the mandate, whether it was the goal or not , i don't know, i will not judge, but it removed akhmetov's direct connection with the parliament and removed another sign of participation in the political life of mr. akhmetov well, and also after the decision, let's say, to leave the media business, akhmetov no longer falls under the criterion of the law on oligarchs regarding the ownership of changes according to the clam . oligarchs regarding participation in the flight in the life of the country and overspending on the date by novin

leonidovych published on the website of his investment company scm, so this week the ukraine media groupl transfer the licenses of its tv channels and print media to the state. there are many tv channels. by the way, akhmetov noted that for more than 20 years of working on the market, the total amount of investments and investments in this media holding exceeded one and a half billion dollars. imagine 4,000 journalists and other employees worked in the holding, in fact, tomorrow these people, well, on the fifth day, that's all. well, there is no money, there is no investor, they say, there will be more. and we will talk about this topic because it you know, the law on oligarchs has come into force in our country. and many of the oligarchs may want to, well, there aren't that many of them in ukraine, but some may also want to give their media to the state, please use nataliya ligachova, what is reda's media detector ms. natali, i congratulate you. how will you explain what akhmetov's step is? he is handing over the licenses. and is he now handing over the obligation to pay for the work? a

that actually is the material base for this media empire , it remained of course in the property of scm i am not surprised that all assets will be for some time they are simply canned and then after some time they will come back to this question in a different form, they are actually more concerned about the fate of the workers because no matter how good or bad rinat akhmetov is, there are almost 4,000 people. as far as i know, how many people were working there now? i know that journalists in general have a difficult situation, many people have been left without work for many obvious reasons, they have been cut off, and now, of course, this is the increase in unemployed media workers on the market. i think it will greatly affect the quality in general of the entire industry in the coming years, i don't like this story, first of all, from the point of view that to destroy, not to build, it was necessary to look for some other formats in order to preserve these channels . so on, but so that they can continue to work, mr. oleg, we have one and a half minutes, your reflection on this story