let's delve into all of it with former united nations weapons inspector scott ritter who we welcome to the program scott good to see you last aspect a pretty blunt a pretty shocking statement from the admiral could he be right though. well i mean it could be if the united states continues on the you know in the direction that it currently is where it is identified russia and china as sheer adversaries requiring the buildup of conventional military power. to adequately contain the threat they pose both in europe in terms of the russians and in the pacific in terms of the chinese as things currently stand the united states does not have the conventional military force necessary to successfully engage with the guarantee of conventional big 3 either russia or china which means that should there be a conflict. nuclear weapons would probably have to be employed on the part of the united states we see this not his theory but reality with the recent deployment of the w $76.00 dash to move nuclear weapon. 5 kilograms of nuclear destructive capability on a submarine that was deployed into the pa

discuss the ramp up copy to all come onto the program scott ritter scott's a former u.s. marine corps intelligence officer and aurthur and was welcome to have you on the program scott what do you make just doing the 8 fold ramp up of nato personnel in iraq. well it's interesting think the the the devil's in the details this isn't going to be instantaneous it's going to be a gradual build up and i believe that it would be your conditions based so it's not as though nato is going out american 500 to 4000 but let's just assume that they do meet this 4000 mark. understand that iraq is in extraordinarily the stabilized nation there is a you know he a none certain security. posture that these $4000.00 troops are going to be deployed in which means they're going to be confronting our. nato is not very good at taking casualties and they do is not very good a combat missions they call this a security training mission when you're beyond baghdad out in the boonies in remote facilities training iraqi security forces that are in constant contact with with with isis or other extremist

weapons inspector scott ritter police the warnings are a dangerous move if the united states dare uses nuclear weapons against russian forces or on russian soil the russians will have no choice but to respond to this is what makes the admiral's statements about preparing for nuclear war so dangerous because there is no way of containing it if there is a nuclear war between the united states and russia it will be a general nuclear war which means not only will both nations be a male it but the world well also be destroyed as we currently know it the united states identified russia and china as here adversaries requiring the build up of conventional military power to adequately contain the threat they pose both in europe in terms of the russians and in the pacific in terms of the chinese as things currently stand the united states does not have the conventional military force necessary to successfully engage with the guarantee of conventional big 3 either russia or china which means that should there be a conflict nuclear weapons would probably have to be employed on the part of the unit

marine corps intelligence officer scott ritter told us who he thinks stands behind nato is ron paul inthe middle east. when you're beyond baghdad out in the boonies in remote facilities training iraqi security forces that are in constant contact with with with isis or other extremist enemies there will be losses in nato is not configured to do this that prepared politically to do this so then the question is who will provide the combat backup and that of course is the united states and once united states employs combat force in support of nato the 2 missions become intertwined and then nato which has made a big point of saying hey we're being invited by the iraqi government which is the opposite that the situation currently exists regarding u.s. forces this is just a horrible situation that underscores 2 realities one that nato is not a politically mature organization capable of making independent decisions and has been pushed into this direction by the united states into the united states is in a dire situation where it can no longer unilaterally impose its will and it increasingly ha

weapons inspector scott ritter believes biden has no interest in diplomacy. it's an illegal act i mean it is administration did not cite any current congressional authorization for use of military force instead relying on the inherent powers of article 2 of the constitution. but when you take a look at the the intelligence to break it down he bombed a foreign country syria that had nothing to do with an attack on american forces in iraq there will be no consequence because congress doesn't want to get involved in the difficult you know decisions of you know the surrounding the use of force because it requires them to ask very tough questions about policies that are indefensible what are we doing in iraq what are we doing in syria when joe biden says america's back he's talking about america's back asserting its will authority through the use of military force this is not about diplomacy i mean joe biden didn't attempt any meaningful diplomacy to resolve this issue we went straight to the guns. this is out say on the way that's all folks for america's cultural