that insures the capital is fresh and new we'll inherent the maintenance to our satisfaction, and, secondly, it's a 10 year lease so over the 10 year life expect some repairs we shouldn't apartment failures the good news the warranties that come with them that is not the normal with our existing sro 13wir7b9 and lastly the cap we've restructured the normal cap in master leases not only do we address the caps but lead to a lot of discussions in terms of litigation and that has meant the cap is meaningless we continue to pay for improvements by capping the amount on an annual basis no matter with the expense from a standpoint and the policy standpoint we know that the owner must provide the funds to insure there's a reserve so the lease itself has a number of timeslyness to deliver the improvements. >> that's great to hear can you go into the specification i don't want to mop lists the time could you talk about the breakdown in the building or the breakdown in the elevator what's the expectation and the lease that will insure they will respond in a timely fashion. >> it's not the lease per sa

secondly you have to vote yes on initiative 71. thank you so much.ext reverend december plymouth congressional church here in washington, d.c. >> thank you. i want to thank the panel. you all did a tremendous job in terms of breaking down the issue. i think that one of the things i want to lift up, is as we talk about the militarization of police forces, we need to talk about the training that goes into the police forces that you have foreign governments training police departments on how to occupy communities. now, let be clear about that. that's what's going on. when the idf, and your brother was with me in palestine in january. he knows that there are this training that goes on with every is thisle police department in america a how to occupy, how to make your presence known, which is to brutalize a community in order to keep a community contained. so when we talk about demille tearization, we need to also talk about home growing those that can grow on the police force. in d.c. and other jurisdictions, in d.c. you've got to have two years of educa

and secondly, we need to look at this as an evolving policy.ardly think, and i have initially been critical of this what seemed to be open-door, open-border policy. but what was perceived as al nusra, the free syrian army. this all evolved over time. so i hardly think that turkey or anybody else in the syrian coalition that was starting this in istanbul two years ago said boy, let's bring they will in because we know they're going to be isis. even six months ago you didn't imagine this was going to turn out the way it has. there are sleeper cells in istanbul. this is not just about the border now. this is in the heart of turkey. i really don't think that this was something that started out -- was it a miscalculation? i would possibly say so, but so, it would be important to look at this as even the iraqi kurds, look, on june 10, when mosul was taken over by isil, what were the iraqi kurds even saying? we're not getting involved. they knew about this. and even they said, two weeks later, we had no idea that it was going to turn out to be this wa

secondly, in terms of commissioner antonini's comments all the fees have to have a nexus study and also, if you look at prop m and go over what happened through the years until today, i think in some ways you can character prop m as a failure one of the reasons prop m was put forgot will it's not only housing but office development and in that regard it was supposed to be as commissioner fong pointed out a 3 legged stool then the fact we're not meeting our housing goals and not meeting our transit demands given prop ms attempt to do that has not worked if anyone is look at prop m it ought not to be from the standpoint of upping the square footage but try to figure out what more intensive relationship can be established between the 3 land uses. that's my last comment i think forever >> thank you. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further we can move into department matters item 10 commissioners comments. >> i ask you adjourn the meeting even if doug writing who passed away last week he was a member in the 80s of this commission the city architect in the commission an ex officio positi

secondly, or thirdly, and lastly the essential recommendation of this report is get out of business. transferred to the fair policy fair practices of the state of california the responsibilities of this ethics commission i urge you to act if ways to implement that recommendation. >> thank you. >> good morning. i'm tom. i want to compliment the grand jury for the report it's an excellent report. it seems like as the city is all pretense and no practice i strongly urge you to follow the recommendations of the grand jury report. i briefly looked your draft response it's a total ignoring of the recommendations of the grand jury. i stron ask you to adapt most of the recommendation by the grand jury. thank you >> any other public comment before we get to the gentleman from the grand jury? >> good morning. >> good morning. >> i'm robert i was the primer author of this report yeah. i was the deputy foreperson of the grand jury as well. it's a lengthy report i'm going to try to sum up with a lot of the recommendations and finding of the report. in analyzing the situation with the ethics commi

tobacco and liquor advisement on stores that face into the neighborhoods some of out inclines but secondly, it make me think about why do we put this into place why allow the advertising for a loophole >> at least a number of the members of the board we all postdate 1965 when the definition was crafted our working assumes thas has been that everyday when we walk by a store in the tenderloin and see dan's liquor store and a or whatever and ofrnlts see a somewhat sign for coca-cola our understanding the amenity has been induced and helping the business afford business opportunities and the branding it might not otherwise get supervisor wiener suggested there are shifts but in our estimation we allow a by sign to allow the business to present itself to its business and gain the attraction and support the business. >> in the time that sorry i realize it's confusing us with the ordinance sign it's much older than that. in the interim period can we talk about the business signage we want to allow if it's true it snbz are getting a benefit you you know, i want to be able to consider the impact it

secondly, it helps us to pay our property taxes and allows us to eat out and spend nor money locally our guests shop in and around glen park area i don't think your fisherman's wharf will be shopping in glen downtown park. and finally i'm not in favor of the public registry and also open for longer stays than 90 days in closing please vote in favor and bring this is to resolution. i think the grayness has gone on too long and both sides need an answer. thank you. >> good evening. i've waited almost 5 hours to stand here thank you for your patience and everyone else. i'm katherine lived in san francisco 8 years i've been an owner on katrero hill and definitely support home sharing work asia did not contractor a small business owner when i don't work i joke and is sometimes there's more free between the lapd's the fact i have share a guest room has afforded me to pay my mortgage and keep my house in good order and to support my very interesting wonderful e claustrophobic wonderful neighborhood with regards to having i have people all over the neighborhood point them to enjoy and often

secondly, what actions can we do only together with allies?rd, what actions should not be on the table at all? the isis issue reflects two of those. the first is when the throat of americans is cut on the national television and then decapitated, innocent bystanders who are in uniteded as victims, the states fundamental values are insulted. and that must have some retaliation. and for that, we do not need allies. that we can do on our own with -- without necessarily solving the problem. >> with airstrikes. >> i would have thought with airstrikes. >> but not troops on the ground. >> this is not a final solution of the isis problem. >> this is to retaliate for what happened. >> it is to teach isis that there is a heavy price to be paid in seeking to humiliate america. and by -- >> but isn't that what the president is doing? >> i think he is doing it not as retaliation. the president began to do it as a kind of, to prevent isis from moving more and more closer to baghdad accompanied with more limitations. it is now merging in that direction. my i

is proposing changes to the takeover relating a to rex regarding the sports fishing boots, and, secondly, the charges we access to passengers crews passengers. first fisherman's wharf harbor sport fishing operations we have approximately 15 square fishing boats and fisherman's wharf there those are family owned businesses and multiply generations i love the names of the boat we have the margaret and the basket tub and chucky's pride and my favorite the wacky jackie. the fishing boat industry were having a hard time and wanted to give harbor tours it's been a successful collaboration and this allowance is really a to help the industry remain strong heave of they've worked with the port industry and other entities at fisherman's wharf to update those tariff provisions to if the tariff hadn't been changed so harbor master joe reilly is here and others in charge of the what have worked with the affair co- port owners to come up with a change to the tariff that are detailed in staff report but essentially their reducing the number of boats and removed language requiring the family member to b

secondly for kadir.hose voice matters in the terms of policy formation for turkey with respect to the situation in both iraq and syria on the kurds. is it only one voice now as is popular perceived that there's only one voice that matters in turkey? or is there a multitude of voices that are formulating this policy? is m.i.t. formulated in policy? where's the best touch point with respect to understanding policy formation on this issue in turkey? >> if we could also get her question. >> my question is in terms of the thinking about what happens in a few year's time. because, i mean, secretary hagel and other people had said we'll count isil. maybe not now, maybe in two or three year's time. a number of coalition partners have said we're going to be arming and training kurds. and some of them are already supplying such arms. so what happens once isis or isil is counted with all of these people who have military training and lots of weapons. and i'm basically directing my question to kadir. >> thank you.Ñi

secondly, yeah. it's not controversial to say human activity is contributing in some way to change certainly. in terms of how much and how serious that is, let the scientists decide that. politicians don't need to decide that. as we address it, and again i'll quote krauthammer. you don't have to be a climate change believer or denier to actually believe that it can't be good for us to be -- if there is nothing wrong in terms of wanting to reduce emissions coming out of our common industry. >> do you personally believe that human activity is leading to changes in the global -- >> sure. i would hope it's not controversial. i'm sure human activity is impacting the climate. i would leave it to the scientists to decide how much, what that means, you know, what are the consequences. >> isn't there pretty much of a consensus on that among scientists? >> again, my plan is not trying to litigate that but saying to the extent we're addressing that we should be doing it in concert with international partners an

. >> we have 3 options and secondly, to get a loan for the ryan white and the third becoming in the past program participants in that. it is encouraged along coastal easier where we have set time like sand and a high water table to a cause the sand to shake i'm going to get this visitation on the same bridge you'll see the water come to the surface this knocks the foundation over and pushes out the ruptured pipeline >> it is intimidating i'm talking to people as a layman who needs help. >> this is a difficult process for people to navigate we're only focused on outreach so we've got the informational and we've spoken to many different owner groups and community groups all across the city. >> outreach is critical for the retrofitting program the city has to get out to the community and help people said what they have to do and do it and raise finances so this program is an advocate and resource for the community. >> so why not skip to the theme. foremost and most to come we've been presenting community meetings and going face to face with community owners and helping people understand wha

secondly, a coordinating role.irdly, strengthened cooperation on intelligence and information sharing among allies to counter foreign fighters. so the rest of it is quite hypothetical because we haven't received any request for a nato involvement, but nato allies are involved and i really welcome that. peter, you added the question about -- >> u.n. security council. >> u.n. mandate. individual allies engaged in this, will they need a u.n. mandate? well, i'm not a legal expert, attacks against religious and ethnic minorities, in my opinion, it's pretty close to genocide. and in my opinion, that gives such a military operation legitimacy within the principles of the u.n. charter. i say this without being a legal expert. and finally, also consider this a kind of self-defense which is also committed within the u.n. charter. so, i would say that, which is also permitted within the u.n. charter. so i would say that as a layman, as a political, not as a legal fund expert, as far as i can see, there is a basis in the funda

secondly, the coordinating role. thirdly, strengthen cooperation on intelligence and information-sharing among allies to counter foreign fighters. so the rest of it is quite hypothetical because we haven't received any request for a nato involvement, but nato allies are involved, and i really welcome that. peter, you added the question about u.n. mandate. when individual allies engauge in this, will they need a u.n. mandate? i'm not a legal expert, so i -- but i see the following. isis commits horrific atrocities, and i would say, witnessing manslaughter, their attacks against religious and ethnic minorities, in my opinion, it's pretty close to genocide. and in my opinion, that gives such a military operation legitimacy within the principles of the u.n. charter. i say this without being a legal expert. and finally, also consider this a kind of self-defense which is also committed within the u.n. charter. so, i would say that, as layman, as a politician, not as a legal expert, as far as i can see, there is a basis in

and secondly it is about money. that is to say, the personal assets that people have or don't have to provide for the own housing and governmental budgets. we have a big problem. because the scales of the change is big. today's population of roughly 20 million americans over 65 will grow to almost 40 million by 2030. our over 65 population will double over the course of the next 20 years or so. that's just a mass of people. if you doubt the sense of this, then get off an airplane any day and see some in wheelchairs that are lined up. how many people need assistance. our society is changing just because of the size of the number of the population that is aging. we're talking about doubling the over 65. that's because the first of the baby boomers aren't between 1946-64, 18 year span, turns 65 in 2011. that was 2.8 million people turning 65 just in that year. the number grows dramatically and the impact is doubling of the 65 year old population. today's population of persons over 85 is 6 million roughly and that will

secondly, i think they'll respond to market pressure. third, unfortunately insurance companies only view things in terms of dollars and cents. they'll make the calculation the birth control would be cheaper than paying for the pregnancy. just from a dollars and cents perspective. they view births as an expense. i think it would be in their own economic interest to pay for it over the counter. i think they would pay for it over the konter. offering it over the counter is not taking away the woman's ability to go and still get the product with a prescription from a doctor where it would be covered under current law. we're giving her an additional option, not taking anything away. >> right now it's totally hypothetical since no drug company has asked the fda for permission to sell it over the counter. do you know any of plans for any company to do that? or is this just a good political kind of answer to the war on women attacks? >> i think it needs to happen. you see a collision and what i see is, look, you have these big companies and big

secondly, there is nothing that they want that you can negotiate about. they want, they have decreed, their life philosophy and pursuit at this moment is selling young women, raping people, killing them. anyone that isn't them, you can be killed. they are a vowed genocidists. and they went after whole groups of people defined only by not being them. if you wera zeety, you get killed. shia, you get killed. christian, you get killed. they made it clear, there is nothing to negotiate, either you join islam or die. what's the negotiation? so that pretty straight forward stuff. >> and the other questions about lessons learned from nato, intervention, and libya -- >> lessons learned from nato was the president made the right decision decision intervene because of what would happen in benghazi. and the president would be the first to tell you this, and all countries that were engaged -- and by the way, certain countries had taken the lead on that as you know with respect to activity, we agreed to support and be supportive. and certain folks were tasked with the

secondly, student debt is an influence. 40 million americans have a student loan.in fact student lending has almost doubled in the last six years. and that has an influence. in fact there's more student dead. the biggest debt category for americans the housing. there's 50 million homes in american with a mortgage on them, the average mortgage is that's ten trillion dollars worth of dealt. the next group of debt, there's no student debt than there is auto debt or home equity debt or credit card debt. so it is, and people are paying those payments, not able to buy houses, so that's a part of it, not all of it. another area is that in some markets, houses are not available, inventory is not available. i have to live in san francisco. and in the bay area, you bid on a house. you come with 27 of your closest friends, and you keep running the price up. because there's just simply no invento inventory. that's not true across the country, but it's true in many of the hot markets, surely the coastal markets. and the one i want to spend a little more time on is one that we a

secondly, student debt is an influence. 40 million americans have a student loan. in fact student lending has almost doubled in the last six years. and that has an influence. in fact there's more student dead. the biggest debt category for americans the housing. there's 50 million homes in american with a mortgage on them, the average mortgage is that's ten trillion dollars worth of dealt. the next group of debt, there's more student debt than there is auto debt or home equity debt or credit card debt. so it is, and people are paying those payments, not able to buy houses, so that's a part of it, not all of it. another area is that in some markets, houses are not available, inventory is not available. i have to live in san francisco. and in the bay area, you bid on a house. you come with 27 of your closest friends, and you keep running the price up. because there's just simply no inventory inventory. that's not true across the country, but it's true in many of the hot markets, surely the coastal markets. and the one i want to spend a little more time on is one that

and secondly, have you decided who will be hearing the appeal for ray rice in your office? >> i have not on the second part of your question. i'll be making that decision shortly. someone else will be hearing that case. on your first part is, yes, it's part of the learnings that we've had throughout this, that there are certain proper ways of having those kinds of discussions when couples are going through domestic violence issues. and we have learned that. and we have learned that from our experts, that we shouldn't have them in the same room or we should give them the opportunity to speak separately also. and that's something that we have learned from this and we will correct going forward. >> commissioner, what do you say -- you can't speak out about some of the individuals who have cases that have not yet been resolved. what do you say to the one individual of the nfl right now, greg hardy, who has been convicted of attacking his girlfriend? what's your language that you would say to him -- >> well, we're disappointed in where he is. we think what he did and what he is

and secondly, have you decided who will be hearing the appeal for ray rice in your office?have not on the8+second pat of your question. i'll be making that decision shortly. someone else will be hearing that case. on your first part, yes, it's part of the learning we have had. throughout this, is that there are certain proper ways of having those kinds of discussions when couples are going through domestic violence issues. and we have learned that. we have learned that from our experts, who say we shouldn't have them in the same room or we should give them the opportunity to speak separately also. and that is something that we have learned from this and will correct going forward. >> commissioner, you can't speck out about individuals that have cases not resolved. what do you say to the one nfl, greg hardy, who has been convicted for assaulting his girlfriend. >> we're disappointed where he is. we think what he did and was as alleged in the court,. record -- he was convicted and then what happens when he appeals that is that it's wiped out until he goes to a jury trial. so,

that has already started their school on this corridor we want to allow to continue to grow, and, secondly, the western selma plan in the legislation and fks in the neighborhood has recognized as a cultural place for the lgbt community we want to support the night life that provides jobs and entertainment too was our original idea to allow entertainment but a slight overview on a parcel that was entertainment we wanted to continue the. >> but had to put in 0 clean up language and in particular this site appreciatively had the 2r5er789 in keeping with the area i think it is so important for us to continue the work especially the day after the 31st anniversary of the fulsome street fair my understanding the largest fulsome street fairy know i was there on fulsome street address great to see so many friends and die-hard registries we topped the 40 average mark of visitors maintaining the mudding character can be a challenge as we residential groebl growth and i want to thank the planning staff to make the changes and preserve the integrity of the plan i also want to thank presidio knoll commu

secondly, i think lack of interoperability of privacy regimes. in that regard there's been a lot of highlight and attention on differences between the u.s. and the eu regimes and a lot of very good work going on in that sphere between the united states and eu. censorship is another issue we've had to confront. again, there can be legitimate basis, certain instances for censorship. at the same time, particularly in countries like china and some instances, vietnam, it can be barrier to increased trade and investment. and finally, trade and access barriers. first of all restrictions on investment. in some instances there's no investment at all in internet and related sectors. secondly, restrictions on related services like distribution is critical to carrying out the service in the particular sector. there are traditional kinds of trade and investment barriers that we seek to attach as well. and again, i won't spend time on them, and they're not within my particular province of trade negotiation. certainly ipr infringement is another very significan

secondly, i think lack of ability of privacy regimes.n that regard there's been a lot of highlight and attention on differences between the u.s. and the eu regimes and a lot of very good work going on in that sphere between the united states and eu. censorship is another issue we've had to confront. again, there can be legitimate basis, certain instances for censorship. at the same time, particularly in countries like china and some instances sl s vietnam, it can barrier to increased trade and investment. and finally, trade and access barriers. first of all restrictions on investment. in some instances there's no investment at all in internet and related sectors. secondly, restrictions on related services like distribution is critical to carrying out the service in the particular sector. there are traditional kinds of trade and investment barriers that we seek to attach as well. and again, i won't spend time on them, and they're not within my particular province of trade negotiation. certainly ipr infringement is another very significant

and secondly, the health systems have really not been up to what the people in these countries need.e they really doing enough, do you think? we have heard approximately $600 million is needed. with united states, european countries, the african union, everyone is coming in in a very concerted way now that we have all heard more is needed. what we hope is our funds ready now, very flexible. in the front lines and to help with new technologies, vaccines. >> and the vaccine would be preventative. we are very eager to see the vaccine. the first volunteers have been treated with vaccines. it would be preventative especially to help health-care workers. accessnt health care and to good health care providers. they are most urgently needed. >> you're watching bbc world news america. they visit one colorado town. >> how often do you think about your nation's economic future? public opinion on this varies greatly from country to country. they think their own country is not doing so well. >> the great recession may be over but the economic recovery around the world is uneven. and so are people

secondly, in terms of that subset because that is the books they read.hat's the kind of geological framework they have. there were instances of where they went. i'll give you one example. there was one pakistani officer who actually go and meet the family who is known, who was briefing pakistan intelligence officer who trained and was seen as the godfather in special forces in north carolina. he played a very important role in jihads. he started wearing a big turban. he was sent a few years ago by the intelligence military to please go and talk to the pakistani taliban. they had good relations with pakistan. the oligarch, not the insurgents on the ground necessarily. so the pakistani military said today mom, we feature. go and talk to the pakistani taliban and tell them we have evidence that they are getting funding from an es. so they had arranged that message because they were ordered to kill imam. unfortunately come to his is on youtube. the pakistani taliban kept him for over year, and beheaded him and despite the best efforts, you think the pakistan

secondly, military action must always be a last resort. again, i believe that this criterion is met. isil has shown that it is not an organisation that could or should be negotiated with. thirdly, there must be a clear legal base, to provide legitimacy and legal force for our actions. i support the motion today because we are responding to the request from the democratic iraqi state, and that is recognised in the un charter. >> as one who voted on 18 march 2003 against the war in iraq, may i ask whether my right honorable friend agrees that we bear a particular responsibility for subsequent events, and, therefore, a particular responsibility towards the government and people of iraq? >> that is an important point. i shall come to it later, but let me say now that, while some people would say that our intervention in iraq means that we should not intervene in this case, i think that there is a heightened responsibility for us precisely because we did intervene in iraq, and -- with all kinds of implications -- the iraqi state that has emerge

but secondly, there are two other issues in play in relation to syria., there is the question of ground forces. the point that a number of honorable members have made is that we cannot defeat isil by air power alone. in the case of iraq, the iraqi army and the kurds can conduct those operations. there is -- i put it no higher than this -- an outstanding question about who will perform that function in syria. secondly, as the prime minister himself made reference to, there is a big outstanding question about the overall outcome that we are seeking in syria. the prime minister said that there is a clear strategy and plan in relation to that; personally, i think that a lot more work needs to be done on what exactly the route map is in syria. those are the particular issues that i raise in relation to syria. i want to make some progress with my argument, if the house will allow me. isil is not simply a murderous organisation. as the prime minister said, it has ambitions for a state of its own -- a caliphate across the middle east, run according to its horrif

secondly, the width of the bridge which they started by crossing -- didn't go to the fort immediately. >> my understanding is they went towards the bridge, then suddenly started getting used to the idea there was a fort. thanked them for using a fort. bridge that crossed the anacostia was narrow. the third problem of course was the problem of the guy on that monument, the undaunted joshua barley. one question, one cannot detract, whatever rude things one says about the battle of bladensburg, one cannot detract from the fact that joshua barney and his flotilla men filled with 300 blokes, facing the entire british army which run right the way through the first two american lines face this quite small force who held them up and took severe british casualties. barney was a serious problem for the brits. and ross himself took his life in his hands. there we are, three huge problems in what was, i'm sorry to say, it was an american disaster. >> thank you. steve? maybe you can rebound the americans. >> i'll see what i can do. peter did make this claim about baltimore being a defeat last nigh

secondly, the cost of pensions. and you are going to hear me talk about the cost of pensions. what does that do? and it has driven up the cost of property taxes. 163 school districts in pennsylvania have asked to be exempted -- a requirement to have a referendum in order to increase their property taxes. and cost of health care, and it's going to get much worse. many of you are dealing with obamacare and what is coming in. that is going to cause it to go up even higher. mr. wolf uses a number of 27,000 educators. that's a false number. those aren't all teachers but people who worked in the system that were part of the administrations. they weren't all teachers. but that's not the point. the point is how much are we going to spend, but more importantly, how are we going to invest in it? not just how much can we spend. >> mr. wolf. [applause] >> well, again, the proof is in the pudding. we have to do a good job in providing education. this is not just something that is an elective. if we want to have a strong economy and strong communities and strong families, we are going to ha

secondly what actions can be do only together with allies. and third what actions can we undertake at all. the isis issue reflects at least two of those. the first is when the throat of a man is cut on international television and decapitated, innocent bystanders who were picked as victims, the united states fundamental values are insulted. and that must have some retaliation. and for that we do not need allies. that we can do on our own, without necessarily solving the problem. >> rose: with air strikes. >> i would have thought with air strikes. >> rose: but not troops on the ground. >> not troops. this is not a final solution of the isis problem. >> rose: this is to retaliate for what happened. >> it's to teach isis that there is a heavy price to be paid by seeking to humiliate america and by assaulting. >> rose: isn't that what the president's doing. >> i think he's doing it. he is doing it not as retaliation. the president is doing, he began to do it as a kind of prevent isis from moving more closely, accompanied with more limitations. an

secondly, more action by the european central bank, and thirdly. you need to rebalance aggregate demand, another way of saying where there's a will to spend, there isn't the wallet, were there isn't the wallet there's the will, europe needs to combine both. >> let's talk about europe again. an issue - you didn't mention energy, we talk about growth and energy. europe has a problem on its doorstep, russia. they have taken a more aggressive stance, but the bottom line is as the winter months approach russia controls europe's natural gas, 30 or 40% of it. what does europe do to get more aggressive with russia, given energy. >> europe has to do something to counter russian aggression. it tried to do that through sanctions. on the other hand, the more it implements sanctions, the more it countersanctions, and if this continues, ultimately down the road russia can disrupt the supply of energy to europe, and that would unambiguously tip both russia, and europe into recession. this is a lose/lose situation. it is yet another reason why people are worried a

the sunseting if you don't put it in the record you're not acting legally this is to be done, and, secondlymore subject u sunset active a little bit concerting it's hard to evaluation if you're going to have enough information after 3 years when you have to make another decision about the next in coming class it's getting nor complicated you have to think about that it has to be read anti loud and is if fittings that's taking into consideration. >> when they said it was read into the record. >> excuse me. mr.cardial man thank you for bringing it to our attention please read that one more time for our listening public. >> well, let's there's amendment but lets you read the last paragraph there. >> i am the president please read the last paragraph. >> the last paragraph this new tiebreaker effective in the 2018 to 19 school year when brown's cohorts graduate from middle school and apply to high school and ton for the 2019, 20 and sorry 2019, 20 to 21 school years but maybe modified for future implementation and now the board will take a vote on the amendment on the floor of this new tiebreake

secondly, military action must always be a last resort. again, i believe that this criterion is met. isil has shown that it is not an organisation that could or should be negotiated with. thirdly, there must be a clear legal base, to provide legitimacy and legal force for our actions. i support the motion today because we are responding to the request from the democratic iraqi state, and that is recognised in the un charter. >> as one who voted on 18 march 2003 against the war in iraq, may i ask whether my right honorable friend agrees that we bear a particular responsibility for subsequent events, and, therefore, a particular responsibility towards the government and people of iraq? >> that is an important point. i shall come to it later, but let me say now that, while some people would say that our intervention in iraq means that we should not intervene in this case, i think that there is a heightened responsibility for us precisely because we did intervene in iraq, and -- with all kinds of implications -- the iraqi state that has emerge

and secondly, i don't want to be able to tell people, i want to do what he did. is no miracle drugs here. it is the pipeline that counts. i think it is premature to get into a conversation about it. >> but the treatment stopped working. >> they reset the clock nine months to a year. >> when? >> back in may. the board and i met in april. we said, i think you need to do some major changes in the organization. they were concerned about me changing the organization dramatically. announced a new ceo. i said, that is great. we were thinking about the first quarter of next year. i said, i'm not going to play the odds and changes have to be made now. i said, let's accelerate my retirement. the board was happy to do that. >> in september 1, he turned over the ceo role to his chosen successor, peter hancock. the transition was smooth and quiet. a vast difference from the days when he took over. >> if there's some sort of secret that you can dispel for somebody with a diagnosis like that -- but still able to turn around a multibillion dollar company -- how do you do that? >

secondly, if you're in orkney where the oil really is, you might just say mr., it is my oil. not yours. and thirdly, if you're -- especially, if you're newcastel, you're 30 miles away from where they are going to get loads of freedom. you're going to say i'm a long way from london. what about me? from a business investment, jobs, consumers, it is going to have a profound effect forever. why didn't business leaders look up to this earlier? i don't think they actually thought it was going to happen. >> back to point, i would hope for a little more -- >> although they didn't think it would happen and that might be lame, i think what is more important is they never thought it would get so fractured and nasty. the yes campaign has been a nasty campaign. that is what has worried them. >> if the yes campaign wins, it is going to get nastier. >> sure. >> if you were looking to invest in the u.k. -- let's talk about the u.k. you have 18 months of figuring out what this all means. do you pull the trigger on investments? >> no, i think in terms of the u.k., you use the wo

secondly, i said to a friend of mine the other day who is a well-known new york this newsman -- this businessman that i had developed an intense concern about this. he said we can deal with this decades done the road. i said no, the reason, as many of you know, the decay rate of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is hundreds of years. what we do today will affect us for hundreds of years. they're cumulative, they are irreversible, and as a consequence, this is an issue that cannot wait. as hank paulson observed to me the other day, if you look past over the cap past 10 years and see the predictions climate scientist have made, they bring forward the timeframe when the severe consequences occurred. this is an issue that we have to deal with now. in that context, let me invite to the podium, secretary jack lew. [applause] here. i'm going to uninvite michael. i will only invite jack. i will say one thing. when jack was in the clinton administration, he was a pleasure to deal with. he is immensely substantive, and very sensitive to the politics of the issues he deals and he knows washing

. >> and secondly, do you believe that right now you have the full support of all 32 owners in the nflking you in what you're doing right now? >> peter, i believe i have the support of the owners. they obviously expect us to do a better job. and as i said to several, i don't like to letdown anybody, peter. myself, it starts with myself, i hold myself to the highest possible standards. so when i make a mistake and don't get something right, it bothers me more than anybody. i think the owners have seen that in me. i think that they know that we have always tried to do the right thing. mistakes happen and i'm sorry for that. >> roger. >> yes. >> you've announced a new personal conduct committee. what will your role be with that and how are you reducing your role or power in these kinds of cases by having that committee? >> well, i think the personal conduct committee will have to develop further and who might serve on it. whether we'll have outside expertise that will join that. it's really about what are the standards, what's the conduct we want in the nfl? how do we want to represent ou

secondly, and this took over the bulk of the briefing, was the air strikes, the u.s. air strikes in somalia south of m ochl mchl ogadishu. he said that they had intelligence that led them to this location, they took out a vehicle but he was specific in saying we believe we hit what we were aiming at but would not say definitively where they got the al shabaab leader and let me, if you're just joining me, we're at the bottom of the hour, breaking news as we've seen this video of this american journalist, steve s ven sotloff. we saw the plea of his mother, shirley sotloff, pleading with the leader of this isis terrorist group basically asking for them to save her son's life. we have karl penhaul standing by. he has seen the video. he has listened to the message and he's assessed when he believes -- based upon mentions of the air strikes in amerli when this video was taken. we have bob baer joining us, kurt volcker, former u.s. ambassador to nato and christiane christia christiane amanpour. i don't know if you've had a chance -- >> i don't like to look at these things. >

secondly, this is not a conventional war, not another iraq or afghanistan. it will continue into the indefinite future. the president is putting together a coalition, not the usual suspects. he brought in other arab countries, sunni countries so this isn't america going in there waging a one-sided war religious war. the no boots on the ground, you can't win if you don't put boots on the ground but they are not going to be american boots. they managed to take back the dam and some territory in iraq. turkey may not be out there helping openly, but there is some de facto cooperation and 49 of their diplomats have been taken by isis. syria you're not going to work with asad. asad will welcome anything that hampers isis but they won't distinguish between good guys and bad guys and that is trouble for asad as well. >> i think it is tricky diplomatically and donald runsfeld said there were no unknowns and unknown unknowns and there are moving parts and we may own that civil war in syria, which is not good news, but the alternative is doing nothing which is not an a