the secular idea that you would do without faith tries to say that's wrong. we have the empirical evidence and here again that we must compel the left wishful thinking people to face up to the fact that you must accept and face empirical evidence. the think-tanks have you. plummet us. the other guys have theories. we must compel the recognition of empirical evidence. >> yeah. i agree with you that think-tanks do offer an important supplementary necessary voice in public discourse in the united states. just to go along with the way you set it up though, the difficulty as far as answering the question of how a now shall we live is a course that there are also think-tanks on the left who have their respective answers and there studies that they draw on and they say those people on the right, those ideologues that are really the problem. so the point is yes think-tanks are part of the picture but they also participate in the kind of and contribute to at least in the united states at the current moment that ideological divided in problematic character. even the qu

secular commitments are not nontheological. they are theological claims.they are but the on court tints are nonexistent or the bracket ability of religious claims. so i don't see any difficulty with that whatsoever. i think it behooves those who do want to make religiously-based or religiously inflected arguments in the public sphere for political purposes to do so in such a way that is going to be intellectually and persuasive and compelling to others. really bad idea to say in terms of being persuasive essay my personal savior, so therefore i don't think that's going to follow very quickly. you have to know your audience is and how to argue it. any priority exclusion doesn't make sense to me. [inaudible] >> and my question is, effectively have two series of claims. i have a hard time relating. one is you have the polemic against the we, that we postmodern man -- three years ago, charles taylor is here. he basically says, we are these people for whom faith is a choice in a way that is not true for people in the past. so you have said we are catholic prote

i mean, secular commitments i not have not the logical. day archeological claims. they're claims about the unimportance organon existence toward the racket ability of their religious cause. so i don't see any difficulty with that whatsoever. i think it behooves those, to do so in such a way that they think , persuasive and compelling to others. i really bad idea. i think in terms of being persuasive, you know, jesus is my personal savior so therefore listen to my political, i don't think that will foster peer etf to know your audience is. but priority exclusion does not make sense to me. >> i'm going to abuse the privilege of the chair. >> abuse away. >> my question is, you had said effectively you have to sorts of claims. i am hard time relating. why is that you have the polemic against that we are -- we, post-modern men are fragmenting. the years -- three years ago charles taylor was here. he basically said, we are these people for whom faces a choice to be in a window was not true for people on the best. so you had said, we are catholic protestant, secularist, w

know the difference between cyclical and secular growers. recognize the sector rotation when you see one and always stay diversified. gary in indiana, gary. >> hi, jim. booyah. >> booyah, gary. >> caller: this is gary ward from indianapolis, indiana. i'm a first time caller and a long time viewer and i thank you for all your help. >> you're welcome. i'm glad you called. >> my question is when is it advantageous to purchase preferred stock over common stock or vice versa? >> preferred, i like to use when i see the yields be well in extreme, well in excess of what i can get from a risk free treasury and at the same time, it's safe. that's when i use preferred. common stock on, i'm trying to get capital appreciation and capital preservation. there are two very different things. preferred is a fixed income instrument where i can pick up extra yield than i can get from treasuries. dave. >> hi, this is dave in sunny california. >> excellent, dave. what's on your mind? >> how do you come across a company that's a growing company, they're doing all

we talked about the secular challenges, but could it be excessive shopping? every sunday night join us for exclusive, revealing and surprising talks with the most interesting people of our time. this sunday. >> we try to be funny in serious stories which is very, very rare. >> he made radio cool with his sense of humor, insight and curiosity. he opened a new window into american life. >> before they know it we're actually able to present something new that they haven't heard about. >> talk to al jazeera with ira glass. >> welcome back, we're talking about whether there's a war on christmas. some argue protecting the holiday should be less focused on the secular left and more on things that have eclipsed the true spirit of christmas. joel, christmas is nothing new. >> most of our churches will be doing financial counseling for people who have overspent or been used by commercialization. i read that the average american family is going to take the duration of 2014 in order to pay off their credit card bills, and it's a travesty, and i think it's a long way from

we talked about the secular challenges, but could it be excessive shopping? >> welcome back, we're talking about whether there's a war on christmas. some argue protecting the holiday should be less focused on the secular left and more on things that have eclipsed the true spirit of christmas. joel, christmas is nothing new. >> most of our churches will be doing financial counseling for people who have overspent or been used by commercialization. i read that the average american family is going to take the duration of 2014 in order to pay off their credit card bills, and it's a travesty, and i think it's a long way from what jesus would intend for us as believers. >> kristen, do you think that it's destroying christmas. >> no, i don't. i think that you can enjoy the commercialization and still be a good christian or perhaps you're not christian at all. and you enjoy the holiday. i'm all for freedom. and i think that if someone is offended by the commercial itization of the holiday, they don't have to participate if that. so i don't see a problem with it. >> yo

here the secular progressives have won.y have turned public opinion around and gay marriage is now legal in many places. once again, the judeo-christian philosophy opposes marriage unless it is between one man and one woman. and it took years for the seq. could secularists to hammer that point of view into the wall but they succeeded. finally number 5, legalized narcotics the judeo-christian view is intoxication is morally wrong because you are altering your state of mind artificially. basically you are abusing your body and mind which are from god. again the s.p.s despite that point of view. so any public display of christianity is not good for the progressive cause; therefore, the far left has succeeded in getting prayer out of the public school systems. and if you want to say a prayer before a public meeting, get ready for trouble. that's the big picture. the struggle between traditional americans who believe that judeo-christian philosophy strengthens the nation and the secular progressives who believe that america is a

secularism is gaining. rapidly i think this secularization is already coming to an end people people are coming back to religion there is a strong need for religion all over the world in the west in the east everywhere in the north and south. that. however then leads also to a somewhat growing antagonism between those who like religion and those who don't but i guess what i mean is that some of the traditional religious teachings there clearly contradict the. some of the more the knowledge you know some of the things that they know about human body the development of life on earth obviously there are in unless you take most of the religious teachings as a beautiful metaphor there is a clear conflict between the two i and even when it comes to basic high school education. i think there is a looming conflict between what you tell. pupils about how life on earth are originally to reach is no longer as a scientific question but for many religious this is still a very difficult issue to come to terms with. i see

we talked about the secular challenges, but could it be excessive shopping? (vo) al jazeera america we understand that every news story begins and ends with people. >> the efforts are focused on rescuing stranded residents. (vo) we pursue that story beyond the headline, past the spokesperson, to the streets. >> thousands of riot police deployed across the capitol. (vo) we put all of our global resources behind every story. >> it is a scene of utter devastation. (vo) and follow it no matter where it leads, all the way to you. al jazeera america. take a new look at news. many worry that the gains made in education will not stick in the future. aljazeera's jane ferguson takes us to a school in kandahar city that was long considered a success and is now facing closure. >> it's a place offering more than these girls know, a quality education in real tangible skills, a path away from positivity and early marriage and towards university and a career. since 2002, the modern stud has been teaching women languages, like management and computer skills. that they are ski

ways of life in history towards the state and the secular society. religion overwhelms the state which also is is a bad thing i think one should see that without overwhelming one of the other one should a system. religion does fulfill its toss of community building given the people a sense of life is there a good reason for. to give them the opportunity to see that there is something beyond that there is something more than. so something that also goes beyond what the state can do do you think the state has anything any obligation to try to strengthen let's say traditional religions to promote kind of spirituality that you just mentioned or it should be allowed to religions themselves that they have to build themselves or strengthen the cells even in societies when. their support is not that strong. from my perspective states. have the task to foster freedom freedom of religion other freedoms also. should see to a framework where people can live their lives properly from their own freedom inequality that means that the state should see two. perspecti

when you talk about secular. i was thinking about the way nonreligious people talk about hearing god through meditation or whatever. and we're still, you know, we have a new language basically about that. i want to see if you can could maybe think about the way the way it relates to today. >> right. well, i think the language and the concern about consult demonstrates an enduring fear of religion playing too much a part in the agency allegation made about them they had been brainwashed by david. and why the people there is no such thing as brainwashing. doesn't actually occur. so how would people think that was going on? well, because the people are believing things and doing things and withdrawalling from main stream america society in a way that seems to be irrational. and the only way people could that is if they were under the control of somebody who wants a certain type of power. so i think that demonstrates a particular fear of americans have that the loss of individual wall individuality. that's why we don

groupsre secularized found it easier to collaborate in those ways. wereme of the changes called forth by the african- american pastors that would be the first door and knocked on what somebody was released or in need of service. -- imured tony evans remember tony evans meeting and the office with the president and td jakes and others of the frontline. they may not have some the sophistication of this established charities but they have capacity. why would they be excluded? >> my question is this, there are differences. dr. john diiulio wrote a textbook you would transfer. i want to know basically would've had stayed the same system are sold any differences -- have stayed since there are so many differences? what do you as a director pass on to the next? >> headaches. [laughter] horrors. messes to clean up. you cannot possibly look back. i said at the outset, what unites us is a lot bigger that divide us. them on a to put level playing field and engage in them and financial and cultural transformation. this is something everybody at this table shares

and then the sense of fear just amplifies, and so in that way that is a secular expectation that okay people have their religion and what they do in their own mosques and temples, that's fine but it should not interfere with public life or threaten public life and the concern for order. >> host: we will skip to the branch davidian chapter which was a chapter in which you explain the idea of cults and what makes a call to and obviously in their case as you are in the book they turn out to have sort of antisocial behaviors and gunrunning and stuff like that but i felt like in that year and in the book but in that chapter you were directly sort of saying, questioning the characterization of what makes a call to or ambivalent about it. he said the label of the cult says more about those who apply it then it does about those it describes. maybe we should talk about this more in terms of the branch davidians and what you found and what i read is i don't know if it's ambivalence, but as a religion reporter i write more about contemporary stuff very again this is still a very alive conversati

and then the sense of fear that amplifies was so in that way that is a secular expectation that okay people have their religions and what they do in their own mosques is fine but that should not interfere in public life or should not threaten public life. again that concerns the order. >> host: we will stick to the chapter in which you explore the idea of what makes the call to and obviously in their case and as you noted in the book they turned out to have sort of antisocial behaviors and gunrunning and stuff like that but i felt like in that chapter you were really directly sort of saying, questioning the characterization of what makes a cult or ambivalent about it. you said the label says more about those that apply it then goes that it describes. maybe we can talk about this more in what you found and what i read i don't know if ambivalence is the right word or complex about it and then even has a religion reporter i write about contemporary stuff. again this is a very alive conversation and when you talk about secular i was thinking about the way them on religious people talk ab

students young secular professionals what is a big threat to iran today is of course that corruption is and many ways a much more deadly challenge to the oath or if you want as presented themselves as being essentially sincere devout people who are poor won't have weapons and materials one to one turkish with assesses that then begins to undermine us between the community or us because he has a big problem with one of. muslim organizations that are. based in america to a very powerful inside turkey has been huge for now between this enormous ngo we want which has a big role in education but in force and spears of her life is going to survive this crisis you think. if he survives if it's much weakened a matter for his main project which was to happen so whoever is president of turkey i think may well be now really just on the back burner but actually when you cast a new install the problem for his opponents is there isn't an obvious figurehead who can replace him who's only perhaps within his own political party and that of course would be a big change because he's been so dominant to

our laws on the country which a libya was a secular state mostly and it was surrounded by secular state if you remember tunisia and egypt who are mostly secular and this has a very dangerous effect in the region if it if it does go forward could it not though maybe help unite the country the time of crisis especially saying you know there is a looming civil war there well a civil war is already in effect but it won't unite the country this will divide the country the libyans have been used to forty two years of secularists rule or secularist manner of living in the country and most of them subscribe to that so these are very few and far between. groups that are trying to impose this only because there aren't had they not been armed they would not have been listened to at all let's talk for a minute about what's happening in the snow tripoli as we've been saying is given the separatists in least ten days to hand over those oil fields what if they refuse could tripoli for the military assault at this time and not at all these these are just saber rattling without any sabers in the armory

we had the secular and these people representing religious traditions as well.t group was able to find common ground and meaningful common ground, i should add, on a range of important issues. including a range of issues connected to the faith-based -- what is known as the faith-based initiative. this group was able to come to agreement on a set of amendments that they recommended to the president regarding the bush 2002 executive order setting out some of the fundamental principles and policymaking criteria for partnerships between the government and religious entities. so this executive order underscored the fact that the religious identity of organizations that received government funding should be affected. -- should be protected. at the same time, there should be clear direction on the limit of what the government can and cannot find and clear directions of the necessary separation between activities funded by government grants and privately funded activities. and we are actually implementing that is a can of order now. another characteristic of the obama w

ways of life in history towards the state and the secular society.religion overwhelms the state which also has is a bad thing i think one should see that without overwhelming one of the other one should a system. religion does fulfill its toss of community building given the people sense of life is there a good reason for life to give them the opportunity to see that there is something beyond that there is something more than. so something that also goes beyond what the state can do but do you think the state has anything any obligation to try to strengthen let's say traditional religions to promote kind of spirituality that you just mentioned or it should be allowed religions themselves that they have to build themselves a strengthened themselves even in societies when. their support is not that strong . from my perspective states have the task to. foster freedom freedom of religion other freedoms also. should see to a framework where people can live their lives properly from their own freedom inequality that means that the state should see two. per

. >> tajikistan is a secular country, but religion plays a huge part in its government policy, whichmeans bringing students back from unrecognized institutions abroad. >> asian institutions, they know they are, so thef go ant decide to control this procedure. >> a 25 years umbuja who was studying in classes in iran. all teaching programs here are approved by the ministry of education which says that it is necessary to avoid conflict between followers of different ideologies. >> if their parents don't comply and bring their children back they are fined and if they still don't act there are enforcement agencies for that. >> laws governing religion affect every member of society. women are banned from praying in mosks. and the parental responsibility act states that parents must prevent their children from taking place in religious activity until they are 18 years old. dozens of mosks and venues have been shut down across the country yet tajikistan is building a mosque that will be the center piece. when completed it will be able to hold up to 150,000 people. the government hopes it wil

views always been regarded by many of his sudden his opponents as being mockery or secular state or history of sensibly accepted the secular constitution of turkey because you have to do that in order to stamp collection but as he's been reinforced in recess elections we've seen shifts towards also seems all season to more endorsing of a more islamic ossie for instance restrictions on so you're welcome whole rants about having a strict a morality code the universe does mom some people also must is a. woman who level he has been almost immune to the world economic crisis and one of the ones great support was that his government seemed able to produce economic growth relatively low in question and of course without allegations of corruption water put their hold you know and now we have the allegations of corruption who also generally who talks economies. are in many who are in the past who say well whatever's wrong is better and i'm better off. if you don't know more about the bribery scandal that drove the turkish leadership to the brink of collapse head to our web site r.t. dot com

ways of life in history towards the state and the secular society. religion overwhelms the state which also is a is a bad thing i think one should see that without overwhelming one of the other one should a system. a religion does fulfill its toss of community building given the people.

if so, how does secular individuals make their voices heard? >> i was warned that it would be great questions. those are all really great questions. so the first question about the lack of voices, i would say transnational and there really is no lack of voices. those voices do not get the microphone and that was only part of what my work is about, trying to meet -- may be working in languages other than english whose work is not making it here, and somebody asked me the other day, what can we do to help? one of the key thing is to get some of these people's words in russian, in farsi, in arabic translated and read here and heard here. that is so very important. it is hard sometimes to make yourself heard even when you write in english. at the time of the 10th anniversary of september 11, of 21, -- 2001, i lived in the new area for 10 years after 9/11 i wrote a piece called why i hate al qaeda which is basically a person of secular muslim heritage is sort of denunciation of this kind of extreme terrorism that has claimed the lives of so many, vo

our laws on the country which libya was a secular state mostly and it was surrounded by secular state if you remember tunisia and egypt who are mostly secular and this has a very dangerous effect in the region if it if it does go forward it won't unite the country this will divide the country the libyans have been used to forty two years of secularists are rule or secularist will manner of living in the country and most of them subscribe to that so these are very few and far between. groups that are trying to impose this only because there aren't had they not been armed they would not have been listened to at all while this place because indigenous tribal groups are largely being left to fend for themselves some of being targeted by militias for having allegedly supported colonel gadhafi and his policy reports next to the plight of one embattled minority. this dirt track was once a building site teeming with foreign construction workers now it's home to forgotten victims of the revolution the people of to work two years ago after the revolution rebel groups expelled them from their ho

so there is a, we're becoming a more secular nation. it's true. we maintain a high level of religosity. is that a word? >> sure. >> you know the reason your big enough if you say it becomes a word. >> thank you. >> i'm glad i asked word of the day. >> it's religiosity. there is an i in there somewhere. smoking pot? i would bet there are people believe in god who smoke pot and people who don't i'm not sure it means you become an atheist if you're smoking pot. >> but more permissive culture, maybe you see. that maybe you don't. you live in washington. it's a more permissive culture, unfetter add borings, okay? any reason up until birth process tlchl is a struggle between, usually people of faith and secular progressives they have media in their pocket. they're powerful. >> i don't know where to start on this, so much error so little time. i start with proposition somehow you know all of these things are permissiveness is radically increasing. i would say one remarkable fen nom nan is increase in opposition to abortion among young people. you would h

bad news for the secular progressives. >> oh, those secular progressives.lar progressive, let me wish everyone happy holidays. or should i say happy thanksgivukkahchristmakkah. joining me now is dana milbank. i want to wish you happy holidays. i think the right just doesn't like the idea of a change in america. >> and a happy hanukkah to you, reverend. >> what do you think about this war on christmas is really all about as you sit there in your holiday regalia? >> i do have my holiday regalia on and i want to wish you both a happy hanukkah and a happy new year. >> happy kwanzaa, merry christmas, and happy hanukkah. i say it all eni am a progressive. >> excellent. we have to have father christmas bill o'reilly come out and do this each year. it wouldn't be the same without him sort of like santa and the reindeer. as a kid i always looked forward to "charlie brown's christmas" come on tv and now i'm looking forward to o'reilly's war on christmas. i think it has a lot less to do with holidays and trying to make liberals look as if they are godless. and i think

. >> my question is about secular and cyclical stocks. you're always telling us to make sure that we're diversified in our stock portfolio. >> right. >> and i'm just wondering how should i diversify these types of stocks in my portfolio? >> get rich carefully goes over this because i think the most confusing thing i may have done for a lot of people is to say i like secular growth, not cyclical. cyclical means you need big gdp growth. international paper. secular means you have a long runway of product that will be in demand no matter what. that's celgene. what you have to do is you plot how your stocks have done against a market in good times and bad, when there's growth and no growth. that's what i do. i've looked back using charts, 1989 and 1991. 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002 and see how they've done. you've got to do that history if you really want to feel confident that you have a secular grower whose numbers don't get cut, versus a cyclical grower whose numbers get cut. a whole chapter on that in "get rich carefully." sonny in illinois. so

he believed they were tools that promoted western culture and secular ism.ranian government is using the social media to transmit iran 's message to an audience that has only received media to provoke fear. and what was extraordinary about it i felt was that here you had a very technical negotiation, and yet the subjects that were chosen by the dr. were on a cosmic level. >> imagine being told you cannot do what everyone else is doing. what everyone else is allowed to do. the fact that that contrasted so sharply with the bombastic language that we heard from the previous president, mahmood ahmadinejad and ideological negotiating team it was a breath of fresh hair air. >> reporter: for much of the american media over the past decade iran has been the new iraq. the parallels were obvious and for iranians scary. nuclear inspectors at the gates. leaders urging the white house to go to war even though iran signed an nuclear treaty that israel has nuclear weapons that refused to sign. saudi arabia in line with israel at issue. washington echoing all of that and gi

he lambastes his critics who are campaigning for a secular croatia. they call every little thing discrimination, he says. the message goes down well with his supporters. six months after croatia joined the european union, the split in croatian society appears to be growing. >> the greenpeace activists who were arrested by russia in september have been released from prison, but they are not yet free. they still face charges of hooliganism in russia. what started off as a peaceful protest against oil drilling activities in the arctic has now turned into a fight for justice and human rights. >> andre is back home at last. for two months, his friends in moscow worried about him. alec is one of three greenpeace activists arrested -- arrested by the russian coast guard. the russian authorities charged them with piracy. >> that was a shock. we did not expect it. it was extremely unpleasant. it all happened very quickly. at first we did not understand what was happening to us. >> the environmentalists had tried to attach a protest sign to a russian oil rig. g

time we see the secular middle ground.he government insists they are being punished in line with the law. mm-hmm -- maher and his april 6th movement was involved in a lot of protests, and really the de facto opposition. putting them in prison will be seen as a breach of trust, a clamping down on dissent. we have in the last few minutes saw a press conference from the april movement saying, "the roadmap is not going no the right direction and we should withdraw from it and fight it." and described the activists as political prisoners. >> the anti-coup alliance says it will boycott. why did it decide not to take part, rather than campaign for a no vote. >> all awrong the anti-coup alliance is closely aligned to the moody analytics. they refused to recognise the legitimacy of the government, and described it as a coup. so the new constitution, which is a product of that administration is simply illegitimate. they don't believe they have a role to play in society. they are arguing strongly for a boycott of the polls. one of th

brother hood, secular army, seculars to opposition. that's a fete. many libya, obama led from behind, left a disaster. we saw in action the benghazi massacre. west africa would be under al qaeda control if french hadn't stepped in. it was not the united states. in mali. this is all over north africa a disaster. nina indicated, obama boasted about our success in iraq ending the war in iraq. he abandoned iraq. he was a won war. violence was historically low, civil war was over. al qaeda wasn't only defeated but humiliated when the muslims joined with us in defeating al qaeda. now it's revived, controls iraq and syria. for the first time it's active and dominant in the heart of the middle east. one other data point. obama has managed the miracle of united gulf arabs and israelis in astonishment of how he con seeded the bomb to iran. they have no recourse or information. all this is sprung on them. the gulf arabs feel abandons. israelis have ability to defend themselves. everybody in the middle east is asking where is the united states? all of this is re

we had the secular, and people representing religious traditions as well. yet that group was able to find common ground and meaningful common ground, i should add, on a range of important issues. including a range of issues connected to the faith-based, what is known as the faith-based initiative. for example, this group was able to come to agreement on a set of amendments that they recommended to the president regarding the bush 2002 executive order setting out some of the fundamental principles and policymaking criteria for partnerships between the government and religious entities. so this executive order underscored the fact that the -- of course the religious identity of organizations that receive government funding should be protected. at the same time, there should be clearer directions about the limits of what the government can and cannot fund, and clearer directions about the necessary separation between activities funded by government grants and privately funded activities. and we are actually implementing that executive order now. another charac

. >> we now have secular norm instead of theological norm that govern our acceptance or rejection of the ways in which a god of gods or god escaladed can speak to people and what impact on that. for instance the -- well. that, by i.t. dpubt seem to be a problem. but when it leads to other elements then the trig your of law enforcement concern as well as the popular press is concerned then suddenly this idea somebody listening to god and having do things that seem to be -- national norms. that's the interest. and that needs to be believed and controlled. ..

we are becoming a more secular nation.still maintain a high level of religiousosity, is that a word? >> sure. >> and that is the trend of the future? >> bill, even if it is not a word, you're big enough that if you say it is becomes a word. it is religiousity in there somewhere. i don't think these are necessarily signs of secularism, i would bet there are people smoking pot that believe in god and those who don't. >> it is a more permissive culture, surely you see that, maybe you don't, you live in washington. it is a more permissive culture, unfettered, abortion up until the later stages, the progressives have the media in their pocket, so they're powerful. >> i don't know where to start on this, so much air, so little time. look, i would start with the proposition that somehow, you know, all of these things, the permissiveness is radically increasing. i would say one of the remarkable phenomenons in the last 30 years is the increase in opposition to abortion among the young people. you would have thought together with o

>> we now have secular norms instead of theological norms that govern our acceptance or rejection of the ways in which a god or gods or a goddess can speak and what impact that has. for instance the branch davidians. you have david koresh who says he has a special insight to the bible and these insights help other members of the community understand the bible better and it allows them to live in the end times. well that by itself doesn't seem to be a problem but when it leads to other elements, then that trigger of law enforcement concern as well as the popular press is concerned, then suddenly this idea of somebody listening to god and having his followers do things that seem to be aberrant to national norms, that's dangerous and that needs to be policed and controlled. >> we are talking with karen houppert. tell us a little bit about "chasing gideon." >> i worked on this book for a year and a half and it's tied to the 50th anniversary of the supreme court decision gideon versus wainwright and my initial idea was to go out and take the temperature across the country to see how this

secular tucking any skin world. managers of a nuclear waste reprocessing facility north east of tokyo are trying to get operations going again. they haven't been able to restart because regulators tight and safety standards following the extant at the cushman bank to clap. they seem to have made a successful appeal for an exception. an eight year olds the article how to reports. the new clio feels like all enduring love directories is located in the nike prefecture. i bought one hundred km northeast of tokyo. as smith attempted to make energy agency. ok so the tea. three point five cubic meters of solutions containing plutonium and four hundred cubic meters of high need of a new apt given the key to waste hours to live on sky. a lot to process the kid into this on a coyote on the phone was suspended in two thousand and seven. and my niece has to be able to be stopped is because of the team at the new korea thank you for pushing on they worried about what would happen if they break it any longer. the pull of the band

syria has become a beacon for extremists all over the world with volunteers even from the most secular countries of europe coming in to fight alongside the jihadists of this is raised why are you some of the e.u. officials especially as these islamists are likely to come back home and some point . has a look at the concern. the number of europeans heading to syria to fight in the country's civil war is currently topping mii you counter terrorism agenda speaking at a meeting of security officials in brussels the belgian interior minister says as many as two thousand citizens may be involved in the conflict his french counterpart saying well those numbers on the increase statement reiterate findings by the international center for the study of radicalization there were a group based out of king's college in london they suggest that since april of this year the number of europeans going to syria to fight increased three fold the findings suggest that up to eleven thousand foreign is as many as seventy different countries may have taken part in the conflict at some point eighteen percent o

egyptian court has sentenced three leading secular activists to three years in prison each for staging and sanctioned rally in cairo an act which is now forbidden under a new law passed last month but he gets into them. the military backed government. the three men could muster up a dollar and muhammad i doubt we're also finding some seven thousand two hundred us dollars. the three men have become symbols of the protest movement that ignited the historic two thousand and eleven uprising against president hosni mubarak a defense lawyer for the activists denounced the judgments against them as political and warned thousands were ready to take their place. activists say the army backed authorities are repressing a fierce crackdown on the muslim brotherhood movement of former president muhammad morrissey have in recent weeks started to target members of the secular activists movement sparking fears of a return to mubarak era repression. the army depots morrissey on july's third after mass protests against his rule since then the security forces have killed hundreds of his supporters and ar

in fact in the modern current secular culture, that would be a shocking moment for a & e to say we think christianity deserves to be supported and if that fonlds people, that's fine. >>> do you know why you feel that way has very little to do with quote/unquote the secular world and more to do with the way a lot of christians tend to be hypocrites and abuse what it means to be christian. that's the reason you think that way. at the same time -- >> how do you know how i think? >> i've been watching you for decades. >> so you think that's how pope francis thinks. you know when pope frangs it is takes this view. >> i'm saying you. >> but his statements that we should love each other, but also he has sustained the doctrine of the church. now, does that make him whatever the psychological thing is that you're talking about? i don't get that. >> speaking of psychological stuff -- i actually am curious about how far you would go in defending inflammatory speech as long as it is cloaked with religious defenses. for instance, louis farrakhan says very offensive things in the minds of a the love a