the ongoing efforts of all of those working to achieve a durable piece, it will do so for the security council, which bears primary responsibility for maintenance of international peace and security. it will do so for the general assembly, which requested the courts advice. and it will do so for the other members of the international community. throughout the trip to come out to us and often violent history of the israeli palestinian conflict, the united nations has been consistent in a support for the proposition that a comprehensive just and lasting peace requires negotiations between the parties to the conflict. as the court can see in the submissions before it, there was broad international support for achieving a negotiated solution to the conflict that will give rise to a palestinian state. a solution in which 2 peoples lives side by side with equal measures of freedom, security, opportunity and dignity. and which results in broader ethnic, regional integration and stability with respect for the rights of all states to live in peace within secure and recognized borders. it is for these r

security council. this was yet again written by the united states delegation. the u.s. delegation which continues to pursue the same objective, to provide clever to its closest middle east allies and drag out time, drag out their inhumane plans against gaza, specifically to expel the palestinians from the strip and to completely cleanse the strip, literally transforming it into an inhabitable territory. under these circumstances, there are open discussions about categories which completely rollout the two state solution. once again having called for an end to gaza, against demands to condemn the actions of hamas. in doing so, our colleagues have remained silent about the 18th october day having already vetoed the brazilian draft resolution with his condemnation. the algerian draft was capable of reversing this situation, of ending the annihilation of palestinians in gaza. unfortunately, the latest u.s. veto prevented this from happening and doomed the fate of thousands of peaceful gaza citizens. everyb

of the security council. kimberly and when he goes back, it takes to the microphone including the palestinian question. see, agenda is adopted in accordance with rules, 37 of the counsellors, probation of the rules of procedure. i invite the representatives of israel, katara and tanisha to participate in this meeting. if it's solely cited. i propose that the council invite the permanent observer of the surface states of thought assigned to the united nations to participate in this meeting in accordance with the profession of the rules of procedure and a previous practice in this regard. there being no objection, it is so decided the security council will now begin its consideration of item 2 of the agenda. members of the council have before them document s slash 2024 slash 173. it fixed up a draft resolution submitted by ontario. the council is ready to proceed to the vote on the draft resolution before it i know give the floor to those members of the council who wished to make statements before the vote. i g

the security council will now begin its consideration of item 2 of the agenda. members of the council have before them document f-2024-173. the text of the draft resolution submitted by algeria. the council is ready to proceed to the vote on the draft resolution before it. i now give the floor to those members of the council who wish to make statements before the vote. i give the floor to the representative of algeria. >> thank you, madam president. my sincere appreciation for your efforts in convening this meeting to deliberate and take action on the draft resolution s-2024-173. the draft resolution under consideration is the culmination of extensive discussions among councilmembers. as the primary custodian of international peace and security, the security council cannot afford passivity in the face of the call for ceasefire in gaza. by presenting this text, our intention is to empower the council to fulfill its mandate and protect lives. commencing with an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. ample time has been afforded for councilmembers to deliberate on the co

it does not allow the resolution proposed by algeria to be approved in the security council. after 130 days of attacks on the defenseless people of gaza and the failure of several ceasefire resolutions in the security council , it is surprising that they still say they need more time. time is running out for the defenseless people of gaza. jeff hale, a university professor in america, who is himself a jew and has been for many years. both in the lands occupied, says the security council should act as soon as possible to establish a ceasefire in gaza . he strongly criticizes america's obstruction in this field. today, palestinian families are gathered in the cold under the rain and without shelter, and israel is destroying them. so what is going to happen to them? this is an urgent issue and the ceasefire is very important now. the duty of the international community is that the united nations has warned in its latest report on the situation in gaza that after the destruction of all parts of gaza, rafah is the last place to seek refuge and survive. the people of gaza. the worl

and that's the reality that's on the sidelines of the un security council sessions. it looks like things can become very emotionally charged and representatives of really acting as rivals. is that really the case? so our relationships between representatives, mobile friendly, jo, well cool deal behind the scenes that we would have normal relations with or without ease of use in disagree. with your call, so including with the, with our west and colleagues because we have to interrupt, they understand it and they may not be very heavy to deal with us. they may have some personal grudges against the restaurant. they may have some convictions of their own, but we have professionals, we have to interact, we have to sort of issues. so we interact different on so levels, so expert level and the level of debbie to them that the representative exponents representatives. there is not. there is no problem for these. i don't think that's their right. busy of diplomats that would really go personal on, on their, in their relations with us. it's really a handful of, of diplomats t

as soon as it is practical, washington's drafted the un security council resolution supporting a temporary truce. its already announced at times to veto the text backed by out of nations. when the council votes later on tuesday, that dropped calls from an immediate humanitarian series far and rejects the force displacement of palestinians, america's resolution ones against israel's planned ground, defensive and rafa saying it will further despise palestinians potentially into neighboring countries, such as egypt. we're going to cost to our diplomatic attitude, james base, is that the un headquarters in new york so that the vote on the all julian draft resolution is going to take place within the next door, but it doesn't look as though it's got much of optimism of actually going through for us is already said it's going to vote at done a yeah, i'm afraid what we have is the situation of the situation here. the security council is depressingly familiar. we've seen this play out 3 times before a vote in the security council on the resolution that's drafted by the arab member of the security

"the security council has for many years expressly called upon israel to discharge all of these obligations as you can see in the table under tab 62 of your folders which summarizees all the relevant resolutions of the security council and the general assembly insisted time and again i quote them the urgency of achieving without delay and to the israeli occupation that began in 1967, end of quotation, and of course as well to bringing to an end the other violations of israel and its obligations whose urgent nature, it emphasized by saying immediately. mr. president, given that it is legally impossible for palestine to renounce requiring israel to... comply with its peremptory obligations, the kogen's nature and the seriousness of their violations by israel have major consequences for third states. now they are set out - minima in article 41 of the ilc articles. the secur and the general assembly have repeatedly called upon all states, i quote, not to provide israel with any assistant. to be used specifically in connection with settlements in the occupied territories. more broadly, they have

saves the main huddle and the way up a security council for making a real difference. well, if you ask about the, i see, you know, that we are very critical of these organizations. there were some hoops link, so you to when it was created, it's the 20 years ago. yes. i'm not mistaken. and during the resolution on that for specifically was taken but seems to them a lot of things happens and uh, a lot of situations where the c displayed absolutely easily selective hope. road show when they failed to prosecute the war crimes by the s. breed them they so you're not, you know, they have dentist on the rock lead via that, of course changed a lot in lower relations thoughts. but as you see, where be puzzled. so with the decision of the i see to all of a sudden a display interest towards a towards dar 4 because the situation dates for more than 20 years ago. and we clearly see some kind of uh, a fee or for the select the tv and vice in the, in the we uh, the situation with maybe tackled my eyes to see um do we do not support the smoke for it? we think it would be uh counter pr

and that's the reality that's on the sidelines of the un security council sessions. it looks like things can become very emotionally charged. and representatives of reacting is rivals. is that really the case? so our relationships between representatives, mobile friendly, jo, well cool deal behind the scenes that we would have normal relations with or without ease of use and disagree with your call. so including with the, with our west and colleagues because we have to interrupt, they understand it and they may not be very happy to deal with us. they may have some personal grudges against the restaurant. they may have some convictions of their own, but we have professionals, we have to interact, we have to sort of issues. so we interests different on so levels, so expert level and the level of debbie to them that the representative exponents representatives. there is not. there is no problem to these. i don't think that's the right. busy of people and that's uh, you know, to really go personal on, on their, in their relations with us. it's certainly a handful of, of

and we hope that the security council would elevate itself to that. the responsibility maybe you will need to say something and i added these be found that we need to say few words. the not a bit. after that, there's much more a lot of the duty as the 3rd group presided by 2 need. see that helped over the past 2 days, a series of meetings with members of the security council, both individually and collectively, particularly with the tenant group tomorrow. a lot of the message of the era who was quite clear that it was necessary for the security council and the international community to assume their responsibilities to put an end to the suffering of the palestinian people. and the genocidal crime has been carried out by the occupation against the palestinian people for 5 months cutting the non stop to permit. now we then held a session with the president for you. i know of the security council and we called for a consultation session behind the doors which was held on monday. our message was quite clear regarding putting it went to the separate from t

n, which constitutes the supreme norm, tracy breakers security council, and the court. and which of course binds them both. furthermore, or in news, circumstance can exclude no circumstance excuse me, can extrude the wrongful is of any i to a state which does not comply with the obligation arising on the printer. you know, of general international rule. this principle is defined by all good 26 of the i'll see all schools of 2001 and this recall to by the equally important trough conclusion, 18 of oil c charles on print tree norms, generally especially blue. and finally, israel count hide behind a ledge to circumstances precluding room fullness to justify the violation of the certification. switch off rent 3 and in transgressive will be added to. these considerations are equally valid. neutrality is retained disregarding obligations flowing from the recitations of the security council. and the 1st and foremost, of course, for those decisions taken on to chapter 7 of the charles. and you can see the relevant list of the tab 3 of your folders being moved case in no case ma

that's on the sidelines of the un security council session. it looks like things can become very emotionally charged and were present the tips of really acting as rivals. is that really the case? so our relationships between representatives more friendly, jo. well cool deal behind the scenes. so we would have normal relations with our, with all of these ladies and disagree with your counsel, including with the, with our west and colleagues, because we have to interrupt, they understand it and they may not be very heavy to deal with us. they may have some personal grudges against the russia. they may have some convictions of their own, but we have professionals. we have to interact, we have to solve issues. so we interests different on the levels of expert level and the level of debbie to them at the present that exponents representatives. there is not, there is no problem to the so i don't think that's a there are. busy of diplomats that would really go personal on, on their, in their relations with us. it's really a handful of, of diplomats t

and there are very few occasions where the members of the security council use the veto, right? so in comparison to the number of resolution, some decisions that are being taken without deposition from the, from the permanent members of the security council. but this is an important tool to encourage the groceries to negotiate them, to, to go to compromise because nobody wants to use retail this up. so to clear this is, this is a really final final decision. if nothing else helps and see if there is no other way to preserve national interest. so the interest of, of partners them legal rights is being used by the very well known would be to rights you. for example, see if we still still are in the context of the gather situations. let's not forget that the world would have been already drawn into the adventure by the us. and these are, you know, the, the thing, the resolution that will do. ready in fact, the ink cartridge, israel's operation in gaza. and so that's what happens. so that didn't happen only because the russia opposed to each. so each always and still limit an import

join the security council meeting. we have also heard from the user id and best during the last few moments that don and given that the majority of the security council, 13 members voted for c spots. i'm not sure who the one the body that was some of his comments. he just said, every statement, a number provided by the un cannot be trusted in cause a how mass is the un. and the un is a mass, is strong, was from these radians. and of course, you know, we have a timeline, not apparently james, in terms of the us presenting it's resolution, but it's not guaranteed, but that's in itself will be passed by the security council. the us was heavily criticized in today's meeting. the yes, the us resolution is interesting or draft resolution not being put forward to a vote. yes. and not entirely clear when it will be put forward for vote. but certainly the us seem to be making some points that that is rather not going to like suddenly sign posting that it doesn't like the idea of the rifle ground defensive, which is something th

and of course, by the un security council. well aware of some of the clear, the lowest these most of the security council that this isn't aggression against. so it goes to you. i'm a little bit against you. how many people there can be no justification for the sound. there is absolutely in no way and no, no. so it makes no sense to, to try to find some kind of reference in the international law. but these, this is a direction in the same way the us on. so you case strikes against present stripes against c a n d rock is also an act of other action. and we, we absolutely, uh square about these in the, in the, in the security council moment. so whether they like it or not. we also said that the root cause of all these escalation that the u. s. is unfortunately in making even worse, the root cause of the situation guys are. so we needs, of course, to deploy a low efforts to stop the fighting, to impose the human you're there in the media of ceasefire, which isn't the, which is absolutely indispensable for somebody there in the age

in this chapter, the security council is obliged to intervene against actions that endanger internationalce and security and to take measures to prevent the continuation of such actions . this meeting of the security council will be at 30 minutes on tuesday morning tehran time. yes, mr. rajavi. now considering that the americans have the right of veto in the security council how effective can the holding of these meetings be in order to prevent such actions that have been taken and the condemnations that have resulted in violating the sovereignty of these countries , while the americans said that their attacks will be multi-staged? was. experience has shown that such actions and meetings , unfortunately, cannot prevent the international community from its latest bitter experiences in this field in the last four months, against the clear violation of international laws by the united states as a permanent member of the security council, which also has the right to veto. witnessed and behind the time, in fact, in various and numerous meetings of the american security council, by abusing this

aware of the agreed framework for a permanent settlement of the parties, disputes as containing security council resolutions, $242.33 a. and then the policies entering the agreements, the precise terms a resolution to fall to a worth recalling. they identified the 2 independent principles of withdrawal and securities to which the court was referred on wednesday. to be clear, this resolution does not determine that the occupation is unlawful. the terms of the resolution like displaying the security council and the general assembly continued to endorse this framework. most recently in december 2023, the counselor, and it's on waiver and commitment to a 2 state solution. both organs also continue to recognize that a permanent settlement requires and negotiated solution under the auspices of the us. many states and these proceedings have emphasized the need for a negotiated solution and the importance of preserving the great framework in the context of these proceedings. the united kingdom shares these views. the parties agreed framework provides a further basis for declining to answer the request.

but most people interested in reforming the un security council. this is what's being discussed all the time. and the id, the topic of prestige is of course the um, so you on this part of the discussion some countries would like to most much the parts of the un security council as permanence. members, it is based on the of course, the g with its own list. so that has to be a just a representation all the countries of the global majority are presented in the security council countries of africa, latin america, asia also. so the current un security council was formed in a situation a source. when there was the evidence of the bus gets to decal and use one of the most of the consequences of the colonized ation would not suggest for you to completely understood when the former colonies would just returning to normal life or organizing the countries the states. now the situation has changed and we see on the new economic power houses in asia, in africa, in latin america growing emerging, we see that right, the entities forming, they want to refuse to us

, do you think that bodies such as the un security council uh have shown themselves to be unfit for purpose? well, with all do respect, they the they have not done what is godly. now we are saying the they are they were created to bring peace, they were created to do this, but the they they are obviously they haven't done what's what's what is required of them. and what is so simple, what is basic, when you are watching what is happening and they can do, they god's help, we have to just find the key to be able to um to to to to convince them, to have them do what's right, remember we were able to change the united nations total uh build, because we were able with south africa changing from apartied state to a free state and the... "the ones who opposed uh the apartide were imprisoned, were called terrorists and they were considered respectful. it was turned on its head, we will turn this its head, we we just have to could never give up, we have to stand up and demand that godly and what's jewish and what is and what is semitic and um is is to stand up and stop and it steps the s

we will leave that for _ security council product.for now _ security council product. we will leave that for now but _ security council product. we will leave that for now but i'm - security council product. we will leave that for now but i'm sure l security council product. we will i leave that for now but i'm sure we will return to events there during the afternoon. now to another story making news in the uk. bbc news has uncovered important new details about the post office scandal here in the uk, in which hundreds of sub—postmasters were wrongly prosecuted. we've analysed documents from seven years ago, which show the government knew the post office had suddenly abandoned a secret investigation into the faulty horizon it system — even though it was an investigation that could have helped the postmasters prove their innocence. andy verity reports. fake digital signatures, suppressed internal reviews and a secret investigation — evidence withheld from court but revealed, in confidential documents released through freedom of informat

not only the security council and the human rights council, but also the general assembly reaffirmed the principle of inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force condemned and rejected. that israel measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, the character and status of jerusalem in the occupied palestinian territory, states in their international relations must refrain from restoring to the threat of use of force against the territorial integrity of or political independence of any state or cars, another states to subordinate in its exercise of its sovereign rights and obtain advantages from of any type. bolivia considers that israel, colonial settlements in the occupied palestinian territory, including east jerusalem, the west bank, the gas strip and the syrian gollan have been built by force through the imposition of institutionalized ratially discriminat discriminatory regimes, including aperti, and though the denial of the exercise of the right of self-determination in contravention of international law, as a result, they must be considered illegal, simil

prevent henous crime of occupation and to ensure the implementation. the relevant resolutions of security council, general assembly and the human rights council. the syrian arab republic stresses the need to hold israel accountable for its grave and continuing violations of the provisions of international law, the charter of the united nations and its relevant resolutions and the provisions of international human. arian law, including provisions in section 3 of the 4th geneva convention of 1949, article 47, and what follows: mr. president, distinguished members of the court, we are here today to make sure that they, the occupiers do not get away with impunity. the first question before, the distinguished court today relates to one of the most important and noble human rights, which is the eternal and fundamental right to self-determination. "the right to self-determination is a fundamental human right that is enshrigned among other international instruments and conventions in article 1, paragraph 2 of the charter of the united nations, providing that each state shall, and i quote, refrain from an

, do you... think that bodies such as the un security council uh have shown themselves to be unfit for purpose? well with all the respect they the the they have not done what is godly? now we are saying that they are they were created to bring peace, they were created to do this, but the they they are obviously they haven't done what's what's what is required of them and what is so simple, what is basic when you are... watching what is happening and they can do, they god's help, we have to just find the key to be able to um to to to convince them to have them do what's right, remember we were able to change the united nations total build because we were able with south africa changing from apartide state to a free state and the the ones who opposed uh the apartide were... imprisoned were called terrorists and they were considered respectful, it was turned its head, we will turn this its head, we can't, we just have to never give up, we have to stand up and demand that godly and what's jewish and what is and what is semitic and um is is to stand up and stop and it steps the slaughte

, and you're not going to have decision of the security council on this particular issue, but states can take individual action against the united states and against israel. i think the time has come. for 50 countries, 100 countries, 150 countries to break diplomatic relations with israel because of the genocide to indicate that they are not going to play the game, they are not going to tolerate that genocide be occurring before our eyes. all right, are we there though, let me let me switch over back to london, kim, do you think that we're there, do you think that? as alfred had said that 50 states should should uh cut ties with the regime and basically denounce it for the genocide is committing, are we there yet because we know um the price that they would have to pay via from the united states and the hegemonic block? i mean, your thoughts on that, kim? well, yes, unfortunately that, i mean, i totally agree with the idea of not only 150 countries, more than those, there's 193 member states in the un, and so... so more than that need to get together and say, well, we are, we

has proposed to put to the security council. beyond the white house, now to the security counsel. is a key phrase in this draft text, which is "as soon as practicable." that leaves an awful lot of room for interpretation, i would say. this isn't an official draft, it is not circulating officially, and therefore there is no response from isra yet. all we have had this evening from prime minister netanyahu is yet another in his almost daily repetition of the need for israel to be allowed to pursue its goals of getting its hostages back and destroying hamas, and anything less than that would represent defeat. you can sense a kind of stiffening of his resolve, anticipating problems with the united states if this resolution is brought to the security council. but we are not -- we don't sense that this is imminent, and in fact, if anything, the americans do not seem to be in a tearing hurry about this. christian: when you listen to david cameron, though, paul, clearly he sees a temporary cease-fire as a bridgehead to build out from, to sort of put in place a longer-lasting indefinite ce

of the un security council, at least in new york. it's a long list to you out of us, the rest of the special that i feel very simple power in the body to represent those statements or some process is that most of the laws of special operation is low. the queen crisis, the representative of the british puppy tears of the key of regime ask in this hall whether it was a pity for us to send our sons to fight and ukraine. of course it is, but the british representative and the traditional western hypocritical manner kept silent about the fact we did not do this 2 years ago to start the war. but to stop in for things a rustle, they impose the new wave of science is not only on love to load on individuals on entities around the world. 3000000000 views, and 250000000. you'd expect to 8 designs. how many people turned in to catch the gains of the future on the way in the central roof? according to this, if you look at the number of use, the super target that we've set for ourselves repeated do not use which is a tremendous which is a very amb

in the security council, there's no prospect for the security council to reach any sort of agreement either . why? because of russia, russia is a party to this conflict, obviously. and russia is a permanent member of the security council. they have vito power and they used to be tow power, numerous times when it came to issues related to the current conflict in ukraine. just like the united states is using it's vito power to protect israel in gaza. russia has its veto power to protect its own interest when it comes to this conflict and ukraine. so that's kind of a big picture if you will, but there are no prospects at least immediately in the security council for any sort of peace. but that doesn't mean that these meetings aren't important. they are particularly for ukraine because they can rally support u. k. for administer, david cameron was here speaking, supporting the ukraine. we saw other high level a foreign ministers here all in new york to show support for ukraine. that is important. it's important for ukraine because again, they want to keep their fight in this conflict, tr

, but of course in the case of the security council when it comes to action, to enforcement, then you are certain to have veto on the part of the united states. this brings me in with the momentum that i see, this is the moment for a group of states, we already say that there is consensus among countries like algeria and jibooti and south africa etc., indonesia by the way, it should be possible to submit a new application to the international court of justice against those countries that are complicit in the genocide. obviously, if you deliver to israel, the weapons that are being used to perpetrate the genocide, you are complicit, you are doing it deliberately, you are making money on it, you know what you're doing. article three, little e of the genocide convention makes the united states, the united kingdom, france, germany, complicit in the genocide. can i just jump in here, alfred, sorry to interrupt, can i just jump in here with what you're saying, that that they would be complicit because they're... going against uh actually something that the un has already stated, the sec

part of the strong criticism of the head of the doctors without borders organization in the security council meeting about the council's inability to save. the ambassadors of china and russia also considered the us vetoes to be the cause of increasing the dimensions of the disaster in gaza. i hope that the sad picture painted by the head of doctors without borders about the situation in gaza will affect the conscience of a permanent member of the security council. the security council must stop israel. america has blocked the way to end the conflicts. the bombast in the security council means to show israel the green light for. his continued attacks on the people of gaza have led to conflicts in the region. but the most important part of the speech of the un special coordinator for peace in the middle east was where he clearly said that a timed political framework should be created to end the occupation of the palestinian land. the possibility of an israeli military attack on the rifa region with 1.4 million palestinians. at the same time as this meeting of the security council, the heads an

president of belarus, chairman of the security council alexander lukashenko signed a security council resolution that approved the draft national security concept and military doctrine of belarus. these documents were discussed at the security council meeting on january 16. when building interstate relations. in accordance with the resolution , the ministry of defense must finalize the draft military doctrine, taking into account the comments made by members of the security council. in the future, both documents will be submitted for approval by the all-belarus people's assembly, as provided for by the updated constitution of belarus. single as voting day approaches, all citizens of belarus, including the younger generation, are concerned about the issues of the future. to develop our country, what is the role of the media in the election campaign and how young people can avoid making mistakes and make the right choice. this was discussed during the test conversation at bntu. our colleague ksenia lebedeva, special correspondent for the telenews agency, met with the students. about a h

the question will be, will it be accepted by the security council? because one of the nice sort of this, it for us replies to what happened today came from russia's and box it up the security council. the yeah, the, the russians, very, very strong on this. that making the point that they with the very 1st in a security council resolution or draft resolution that didn't get adopted to come up with the idea of a cease fire on egypt sees fall that was back in october. when the death toll was about a 1000 and now the debt still stands at about $30000.00 and so on. this issue, russia believes that it has the moral high ground. what will happen with regard to the use this us um a draft resolution. it's not actually even being formally presented to the security council by the united states. we believe that will happen in the coming days, and they don't seem to be in a great hurry. they say, they've said to report is, i don't know great how. how are you to see a security council resolution in place, but they've put forward, they say all the ideas they'd like

— that we had before the security council meeting _ that we had before the security council meetingy council meeting more than - that we had before the security council meeting more than 50 i that we had before the security- council meeting more than 50 foreign ministers— council meeting more than 50 foreign ministers and — council meeting more than 50 foreign ministers and ambassadors _ council meeting more than 50 foreign ministers and ambassadors putting i council meeting more than 50 foreign ministers and ambassadors putting in| ministers and ambassadors putting in a joint _ ministers and ambassadors putting in a joint statement _ ministers and ambassadors putting in a joint statement calling _ ministers and ambassadors putting in a joint statement calling for- ministers and ambassadors putting in a joint statement calling for russia i a joint statement calling for russia to immediately— a joint statement calling for russia to immediately withdraw _ a joint statement calling for russia to immediately withdraw its - a joint statement calling for russia to immediately withdraw its

ali rajabi, sada and sima news agency, united nations security council, new york. levision advertisements of the candidates for the islamic council elections on 200 sada and sima channels have started since the 3rd of march. these debates have given people a good opportunity to learn more about the programs of the candidates. i was waiting for the debate to start and thank god it started in the morning and we can see that both my knowledge and awareness have increased a lot . let's evaluate the level of their literacy and their efficiency compared to the candidates we can make a conscious decision and choose a good option. the debates between the candidates for the parliamentary elections were held and broadcasted for the first time. can i do this ? it is one of those very good programs that has been neglected for several years, maybe several times. i saw the comment and based on the fact that those who choose aslha's candidate to speak in this debate, it was a beautiful work of seda sima, by the way. i chose my candidate in the same debate. did watching the electio

the security council must take action as quickly as possible to bring a hole to hostilities. the organization of islamic cooperation also expressess deep regret over the unsc failure to adopt the resolution, describing it as negative reflection of the council's. that it gives israel the green light to carry out more massacers. addressing the security council meeting, the palestinian envoy to the un slammed the us veto, calling it absolutely reckless and dangerous. algeria on behalf of a group of arab states put forward a draft, demanding an immediate cease fire in gaza. unsurprisingly, the us used this veto to block the resolution on tuesday, which was the third time since the gaza genocide began. the herowing experiences of syrian children affected by war, the indomitable spirit of young survivors, how do they survive amid indiscriminate bombings and explosions? welcome back to the news on press tv. the us president joe biden's top middle east advisor is expected to visit egypt this week for negotiations a potential gaza ceasefire deal. brett mcgerk's planned visit comes as

so security council meets new to monk. let's see i'm of the 3 of the russians special. my field formation, bosco's, and boy, to the group side of that is not finding a claim that is suffering from that confident, but also your place has been described in by the you the washington. i'm russell. impose a new wave of sanctions. not only on most, put on individuals and entities around the 3 venue in the it's, i'm 250000000 unique spec cases, but how many people tended to catch the games will seem to underway in sense of a russian, according to is the look at the number of views, the super target that we've set for ourselves. 3000000000 view not community use, which is a tremendous which is a very ambitious figure. that's a 3000000000. the whole of that 3000000000 years would correspond to approximately 250000000. unique user and unix potatoes, the promo code to the well, this is the and is a good to have your company today. my name's amounting it's all of this story is run down with because of the eve of 2 years. it's been the eve of 2 years since the beginning of the plann

to induce the continued application of the security council framework to base policies and the need for its urgent implementation at the earliest possible opportunity to record face cost. his obligations to respect the terms of the council's framework, or to recall both parties agreement not to aggravate the dispute by taking any step to change the status or integrity of the occupied territories until a negotiated solution is agreed. and last me to reaffirm the parties applications in the interim agreements that they negotiate on permanent status issues. in this way, the court could assist the general assembly in achieving it stated objective, which is to support urgent progress to within negotiated solution within the security council frame. what the united kingdom reiterates, that's a negotiated 2 state solution, is the only way in which the israeli palestinian conflict will be resolved. mister president, hon members of the court. thank you for your attention. that concludes the united kingdom submissions. i think that that additional, you know, you've been listening that to the u. k.

the gaza crisis was not on the agenda at last night's meeting of the un security council. this council only paid attention to the situation in yemen, which was warned by china and russia to america and england about daman. the dangerous situation of the red sea has ended for these two countries. despite the deterioration of the situation in gaza and the increasing requests of the international community for the intervention of the council security in order to end the crimes of the zionist regime in gaza. this council has not convened any meeting about gaza since two weeks ago. meanwhile , the deputy secretary general of the united nations has warned that the people of gaza are under attack. which is unprecedented in its vastness and brutality, more than half of the population of gaza has gathered in rafah while they have nothing to eat and lack medical facilities and a place to sleep . israeli attack on rafah causes new carnage in gaza. the united nations high commissioner for human rights, by announcing that the amount of civilian killings in gaza is unprecedented, calls f

so it wasn't just the united nations security council in general, assemble, they do have to memorize the 2 year anniversary of these special military operations . and in addition to that, the white house you posed a huge new, sweeping round of sanctions on the rush in response to the 2 year anniversary. the conflicts. however, these sanctions, while they were targeting russia were not only imposed on with that country. they were not only imposed on russia was they were imposed on a number of different countries that were affecting us department of the treasury's office of foreign asset control. targeted 26 3rd country entities and individuals and 11 countries, including the people's republic of china, serbia, the united arab emirates, and linkedin stein, china speaking before the security council, specifically called out through these sanctions and how they are getting in the way the intentionally building a road toward peace and better cooperation between countries. china had a rather negative assessment of this recent move by the white house own loved then here's a whole the situat

the work of the security council, and the architecture of international peace and security. as members of this council we vawl a collective responsibility to uphold the u.n. charter. it is on us to further advance the implementation of the resolution adopted by the general assembly during its emergency session on ukraine. we must honor the cause of the secretary general for diplomatic solution. all these elements are critical to restoring international peace and security. madam president, the number of civilian casualties in ukraine significantly increased in december and january, compared with previous months. it's been verified that 158 civilians were killed an 48 injured solely in january. since the beginning of this war, there have been over 30,000 civilian casualties and more than 14 million people in need of humanitarian assistance in ukraine. the deportation of children is of particular concern. according to the ukrainian national information bureau, over 19,000 children have been deported or forcibly displaced. in this regard, malta records the report which shares rus

4th time the us says, block security council action on a see saw. the new drum resolution appears to show that washington's position is perhaps changing. but what's happened here means a c spot isn't gonna happen any time soon. and that means the desk told him, garza is going to continue to rise. james bays out to 0 at the united nations. let's turn out to be occupied westbank or at least one palestinian has been killed during his rainy raid. i need jeanine refugee camp troops that a car on fire as they withdrew from the area in the area as of wednesday. this is ready for snow storm. the ask refugee camp in the city of numberless and rated towns may have to pass on kalki, yet is where it has continued to frequency and intensity of raids. since the war started on the foot of reports from occupied east jerusalem, a continuation of intensified reigns across the occupied west bank by these rarely military. we're looking at at least one palestinian killed in jeanine, the largest of the incursion, seemingly in jeanine and its refugee camp. several dozen m

so, it takes _ put to the security council. so, it takes it _ put to the security council.w to the _ takes it beyond the white house, and now to the security council. there is a key— now to the security council. there is a key phrase in this draught text — is a key phrase in this draught text "as _ is a key phrase in this draught text. "as soon as possible." that leaves _ text. "as soon as possible." that leaves an — text. "as soon as possible." that leaves an awful lot of room for interpretation. this isn't an officiat— interpretation. this isn't an official draught. it's not circulating officially, and therefore there is no response. always — therefore there is no response. always had this evening from prime minister— always had this evening from prime minister benjamin netanyahu is yet another, _ minister benjamin netanyahu is yet another, and his almost daily repetition of the need for israel to be allowed to pursue its goals of getting _ be allowed to pursue its goals of getting hospitals back and destroying hamas and anything less woutd _ destroying hamas and anything

and eventually it took to the floor of the security council and laid out the reasons for the special military operation. how it was a result of long standing efforts by the united states with the stabilize ukraine and keep ukraine a conflict. the north, ignoring of the mens green as other factors. he also emphasized that ukraine is losing before, but they're not alone and taking these losses. those pleasures of sage interior. so she's going to see what you're paying for their interest is what the lives of today's native ukrainian says. i believe the west, the lead by the united states with success neo colonial traditions is trying to solve it's jill political problems. and prevent washington from losing itself a pointed wrong of worlds hegemon, or to strength and other powerful and self sufficient poles in the world. if it could be that as it may today, it is already obvious that in this proxy war of the united states, the european union, and nato against russia, with the hands of ukrainians. ukraine is losing. and what is no less important, no matter how hard it may be for our europ

now, russian and bastard, advanced to the floor of the security council and laid out the reasons for the special military operation. how it was a result of long standing efforts by the united states to the stabilize ukraine and keep ukraine icons lexia, north. ignoring of the mens green mentioned other factors, he also emphasized that ukraine is losing before, but they're not alone and taking these losses. and those pleasures of phase interior says using this, you're just paying for the interest with the lives of today's native ukrainians. this, i believe, is the west slide to buy the us with the best neo colonial traditions. this is try just all these g political problems can prevent washington from losing itself. a pointed roll of wild hedge on. i'm just trying to know that powerful and self sufficient polls in the well, but that does, it may, it is already obvious today that in this proxy, more of the united states, the european union, and nato against russia, by the hands of the ukrainians. ukraine is losing grades and what is no less thing for him, no matter how hard it may be f

continues as confirmed by the unequivocal and contemporary practice of the general assembly, the security council as well as other united nations organs and bodies and as the court has previously reiterated in its wall advice. opinion there exists and i quote, a permanent responsibility of the united nations towards the question of palestine until the question is resolved in all its aspects in satisfactory manner in accordance with international legitimacy, and quote. the questions put before the court by the assembly does seek the court's legal guidance on matters of fundamental and longstanding importance and concern to the. united nations. third, all of the ground for declining to issue an opinion suggested in the submissions of few states fall far short of constituting compelling reasons that must exist for the court to refrain from answering the general assembly questions. some of these submissions oppose the advisory opinion because of the proported existence of negotiation framework or of bilateral negotiations. however, none of these considerations constitutes a reasonable basis for the c

exercises its right to establish an independent state, that state, in accordance with with the security council and general assembly resolutions is emerge within the 1967 borders with east jerusalem as its capital, only this approach based on international law can bring a lasting peace for the region and security for palestinians and israel is alike. this is the spirit that we have. that has been guiding russia in fulfilling its responsibilities as mediator between palestine and israel, notably as member of the so-called quartet alongside the united nations, the united states and the european union. the history of the conflict shows what happens when security council resolutions are ignored and influential global actors are in incapable of unwilling to help the parties find consensual solutions, attempts to put the conflict into a low intensity mode, instead of a comprehensive settlement, have time and again provoked eruption, eruptions in the occupied territories. the current wave of violence is no exception, it was preceded by a persistent policy of the united states and its allies aimed at r