i come to you not only representing sf city but representing over 8 hundred and 60 partners in san francisco locally and fwoi thousand employees by also a a fifth generation san franciscan living in the city we ask the board to reject the challenge in favor of the pilot program in hopes of easy congestion for the policy first thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please i'm adrian i also work with the bay area couldn't and am a resident of district 9. we've heard about displacement and there's 0 no one saying this is a concern and the appellants are arguing the shuttles are thriving but i ask you to consider statistics san francisco created over 28 thousand jobs last year and in silicon valley those numbers are 48 thousand jobs and absence better on heirs but still around 3 thousand housing units so if you have a region that's attracting people and attracting jobs you're going to faces a housing crisis those shuttles are a symptom not a cause given the carbon and the benefits those shilts have provided and given some of the tortures logic how the buses are saying its bad. the envi

yes, sf city is here, representing x number of tech companies. but i just want to remind folks remember several years ago when we were debating the twitter issue how this hall was crawling from twitter when they wanted something. i think it's important because before we learn to live to -- together we need to make sure that all of our stakeholders come and join us. speaking at mayor's office is not even half of the equation but developing relationships with each one of the members here so that the companies can better understand the culture of the neighborhoods that which we represent. and want to acknowledge that the akkad ex-was correctly issued and thanks mta for that. i also want to take a moment to address some of the comments that were said. i found some of he is the offensive and disrespectful. references about, equating this moment in time of that we are dealing with technology or the google buses and the annihilation of the gross interpretation of a historical account. i find it also interesting that we are discussing literally mission h

sf getting cut out. what's the only approach that's been present to the city and county of san francisco go look like there have been other things like the green finance but the g finance sf didn't optional be covers a small section. there was a mayors task force that was done led by the department of environment looking at the hundred percent renewal and in that document it talked about clean power sf getting us to one hundred percent energy conservation >> it says the major programs moving to one hundred percent electricity is one of the major things to reduce the green house gases. we can reduce the green house gas emissions it disappeared >> that's where the black man plan the mayors energy task force in 2012 was not released until 2013 and they give you ways to do it and one of the biggest ways is clean power sf is the best way to do that i love the program but it's not going to get you to one hundred percent so you have to figure out that but you're getting a lot important moping people into one hundred percent renewal. >> thank you i'd like to call up the president of the department of the environme

the target sf and e budget is one hundred million the city is giving 1 million and we're working closely with the community to identify support for the sf and e as well. the next point is sf and e is styling the procurement and purposing process. san francisco general is working in e in conjunction with the office of contract and office of public finance to identify ways to streamline the procurement process and that will include the review felt contracts and city procedures and that's in the early phases but will be continued to be streamlined. information technology finally we have a rebuild it program and compounds in place to make sure the infrastructure and systems for the new hospital are in place to support the patient care and improve the workflow and provide a stronger foundation for future systems. i'm going to turn it over to ron alameda >> thank you ron alameda department of public works manager for the

staff has been very clear that clean power sf is necessary to the city meeting its action goals, necessary to the clean action strategy and had it not been from signals from the mayor's office to kill this program when it shouldn't be and when you can get more funds from it, staff wouldn't have felt like they had to leave it out of the climate action strategy. with that said, we and others spoke at the policy committee meeting a while back to make clear that the climate action strategy needs to have clean power sf put back in it. the staff is great but the staff made a mistake in responding to the mayor's pressure by removing the program that's the most important program in the city for clean energy for the city to reach its goals and for your department to reach its goals. and like i said, this specifically impacts this budget and future budgets because it gives you an opportunity to reprais the money you are losing because of the cuts you are facing because sfpuc has not got its house in order, to be blunt. it should have known about that water tunnel problem long before, long ago when t

city clerk: sf 11234 >> okay. thank you this item sponsored by supervisor avalos. i will turn it to you. >>supervisor john avalos: thank you, chair farrell. we'll talk about solicitation requirement or contract agreement. i'm not in a habit of presenting these types of agreement to the board nor necessarily approving them but i think it's a very very special case based on the work that's been done already by the contractor and the relationship between this project, the community groups that has been supporting this project and the parks and recreation department. i'm going to read the findings here that explains very well what this project is about. i know nicole is here from the parks and recreation and tim from barn and will talk as well. i might do her work by reading the findings but i think they are pretty significant. geneva car barn and powerhouse, the car barn designed in 1901 by the reed brothers by the private railroad and san francisco municipal railway, our muni. it's the last physical railway and city landmark in 1985 and placed in the national histori

the city sf san jose is responsible for the publicly owned build and was in the proesz sf getting mpermits to tear it down. why were so many people living inside? >> our goal is to take it safe. we've taken aggressive steps to fence it, patrol it and inspect it over years. >> reporter: this quickly became a home for transients who are now homeless once again. what we don't know yet is if they all got out alive. what you're looking at now is a police officer who is picking up the cones and opening up montgomery avenue. this street has been closed since the fire late yesterday afternoon. firefighters tell me that they do consider this fire suspicious. so once they're able to bulldoze the remains of the build, then arson investigators can go in tomorrow morning and try to look for evidence that will give them clues as ho tow the fire started. if you look in that back corner, that's where i spent eight years of my life anchoring the morning show and it really is sad to see it now reduced to just debris. i'm sure you can relate to that, raj. >> i sure can. i remember those days well. it is emot

that will also fund dental hydrogen in our city's public health department and with conversations with the sf dental society there's a wide awareness of shrug sweelgd beverages harm teeth health and it will help to tap the water and create the educational programs throughout the schools and city. many of us know been working on this for years a soda tax isn't a silver bullet but one strategy to protect the community and reduce consumption and raise revenue that helps in schools and park in the city but to put the connection with the harmful beverages and the lack even if things in our city this provides a real solution as it funds the thirty to $31 million across the city how we program where the funds go as well. there's a majority on this board of supervisors 6 of us that are the co-sponsors and i want to thank supervisor wiener and his staff and peter from my staff that worked closely we're joined at the hip at times and malia cowen and supervisor avalos from district 11 and supervisor chiu and supervisor wiener but thank you to all the people that opportunity out to speak i think this wil

city my country. i'm wearing 3 hats my enterprise hat and the campaign for sf which we started and had a key partner to bring in the philanthropy because it takes a city to do this we bring in local and national fountains and there were 3 initial groups that came into the campaign early and said i get is the san francisco foundation is one and the bank of america is the third one they understood this is a community and the idea of patience this is going up to take a long time. in the important. to see that enterprise calls this the most important initiative in san francisco and actually i've said enterprise we're a national organizations but we look forward not only housing but transforming lives and community.

city clerk: sf 61234 item 7: 7. approving proposed service and route changes as part of the transit effectiveness project including frequency increases and decreases, new routes, expanded limited-stop service, realigned transit routes including eliminating segments of service in some casess, a route elimination, and expanded hours of operation to municipal railway transit service including the following route additions, realignments, and modifications/eliminations : e embarcadero; 1bx california "b" express, 2 clement; 5 and 5l fulton/fulton limited; 8x bayshore express; 10 townsend; 11 downtown connector; 12 folsom/pacific; 16x noriega express; 17 parkmerced: 18 46th avenue; 22 fillmore; 28 19th avenue; 28l 19th avenue limited; 29 sunset; 33 stanyan; 35 eureka; 43 masonic; 47 van ness; 48 quintara/24th. street; 52 excelsior and 76x marin headlands express, and the following service frequency modifications: 1 california; 2 clement; 3 jackson; 5 fulton/5l fulton limited; 6 parnassus; 8ax bayshore 'a' express; 8bx bay

city clerk: item no. 2 sf 21234 breed breed okay. ms. campbell, please come up to us. >> campbell from the budget legislative analyst office. under our contract with the city we are required to submit an annual work plan and to have an annual performance evaluation. this is our proposed work plan for before you is a proposed work plan for calendar year 2014. we are already 2 months into year. it is for 16, 860 hours of service divided into three categories. it's pretty much the same plan as we submitted and worked under last year. a couple differences are under budget analysis. we have increased some of the allocations because we would be increasing budgets in may of last year. we also included and overview report on the impacts of the budget which we did last year at the request of the board and this point we are requesting from the budget review. the other is we are recommending 16 hours of service and combined that category at the question of one committee. in terms of what that means for this year, already 2 months into year we have s

of cuts included the assumed reductions from 5 million down to 2 million go solar sf, cut energy sufficiency, cut city renewables on city buildings, $90 million, 30 million each from programs that we really want to do. but if we

of cuts included the assumed reductions from 5 million down to 2 million go solar sf, cut energy sufficiency, cut city renewables on city buildings, $90 million, 30 million each from programs that we really want to do. but if we continue to provide power below cost, there just is not enough money to do all the things that are good and that we would want to do. and, so, the fiscal plan for the puc's power en

of cuts included the assumed reductions from 5 million down to 2 million go solar sf, cut energy sufficiency, cut city renewables

of cuts included the assumed reductions from 5 million down to 2 million go solar sf, cut energy sufficiency, cut city renewables on city buildings, $90 million, 30 million each from programs that we really want to do. but if we continue to provide power below cost, there just is not enough money to do all the things that are good and that we would want to do. and, so, the fiscal plan for the puc's power enterprise was balanced the last two. previous to that it was not balanced and it showed a shortfall. but it did you point out that it is relatively straightforward if we don't have more revenues to pay for costs, we could only buy what we can afford to. so, here again now, we fast forward two years three new pieces of information mean costs even larger than what we have ever assumed. mountain tunnel was already in last year's capital plan [speaker not understood]. it was in it for the last several as far as the maintenance work, but it was in at $100 million of cost. with the potential for collapse of the mountain tunnel which would disrupt the water supply and a recently completed engineering study,

the first thing that comes to my mind is the community choice segregation program in the city called clean power sf i know the board is interested in. one of the things that could be done is [speaker not understood] customer rates could go towards funding a go solar s.f. program which would give you permanent funding to for that. the problem we have is the puc ha decided it doesn't wish to work towards that program. you lost that issue but that is a potential revenue stream that could be utilized that supervisor breed stepped out for a minute. on lafco, she has asked that the lafco commission put together an rfp which we have done and are in the scoring process to look at how we do a build out plan and go solar s.f. funding is what we look at is that a reasonable option for us to use for future can cca program in the city and the other thing that is separate from that, but still goes into it, the budget [speaker not understood] problem the puc is having are real and true, but one of the things cca program could do is help alleviate some of the budget deficits instead of it going out of the puc to d