should we that? that. and should we know that? should inside? but we should we look inside?'t necessarily need a public inquiry. huge inquiry. that could be a huge expense. we do should. we should we investigate it. so next time there's pandemic we all in the there's a pandemic we all in the best way all of us. best possible way for all of us. well lots people are investigating and have been investigating it and have been plenty of research done by scientists. economy ists and others suggesting that the policy is largely and we have the evidence that know sweden which didn't lockdown at in 2020 now has a lower number of excess different countries did lockdown different countries did lockdown different circum sort of florida true in nicaragua oranges in times that but i think i think i the failure of the zero covid policy to prevent infection in china is yet more evidence that the lockdown policy is largely ineffective . if it's ineffective ineffective. if it's ineffective when imposed , that extremely . when imposed, that extremely. how can we think when it's effective it's

and i think really that's what team really that's what our team should want should have done.don't want to put at the door of the to put this at the door of the players the fact that they didn't the rainbow armband. didn't wear the rainbow armband. i this the door of i want put this at the door of fifa. that's also true what occurred when i saw them occurred to me when i saw them on pitch today babies on the pitch today their babies i was in 19 the guy i mean, it was in 19 the guy that that was our star player today these poor kids and honestly looked them honestly david looked at them and i'm not sure you and i thought i'm not sure you could me on a map. you could show me iran on a map. you know, i thought i'm not sure you know, i thought i'm not sure you know, they've they've left school very young. they're not going rashford, going to be marcus rashford, perhaps exception. he's perhaps he's an exception. he's very engaged. very politically engaged. but these not politically these kids are not politically engaged. these kids are not politically engagedall their life and they

they should not go to congress and talk to me about this. this should be guaranteed and law.hat is what i want to do. i want to take the president of roe v. wade, which guided policy for 50 years. she supported the overturning of roe v. wade and said she would be a pro-life vote in congress. the folks in this state deserve a pro-choice vote in congress. that is what i display. it's politicians to decide this issue. i want women and families with their doctors to decide this. ms. leavitt: you what politicians to make those decisions. you expressed your support for federal restrictions mr. pappas: to override our state. mr. pappas:that is not true. ms. leavitt: i support closest to the voters to make decisions, not just on this issue, but every issue. that is why i got to this race to relinquish the power of the federal government and give it to our state and people. my opponent, you support politicians having the right over this issue. mr. pappas: that is not true. i think it is a choice that is with women, families and consultation with doctors. i think it is chilling that yo

, why should procedure even matter? in politics, our majorities the only thing that matters? the answer, of course, is our procedure, that is the rules that govern the house, i won't make majorities matter. at its core, procedure is what makes representation matter. the rules are how individual members of congress are given the right to exercise their will on the body. it's a structure by which all voices are heard. but the house of representatives in 2022 is as autocratic as it's ever been. over the course of the last 15 years, the peoples house has increasingly just reflected the whims of three or four people, and no more. when it came to the house as a junior staffer in 2006, open rules on appropriations bills where the norm. members would vote until the early hours of the morning on any and all issues individual members cared about. fast forward to now, i've spent five years teaching staff who have never even seen an open rule. as i tell many of, them it's a unicorn. mythical, elusive, exists only in books. staff to

should they be using positive discrimination? absolutely.ur of positive discrimination, both on ground of gender, where it's improving in the bbc, and on ground of colour. i'm absolutely in favour of that. it should represent the whole of society in as far as it can. i mean, when i came in, it was all, you know, university, and people who ran the place, people up there were all, oxford and cambridge, white, and it was like that for a long time. i think it is changing now because i think its power has been broken by all the other outlets that you were talking about. so, it's no longer enough to say, "this is the bbc, "we are the bbc, we tell it to you straight," and all that. the big battle for the bbc now is how to reflect the society that's increasingly complex and divided. and for that, you need people talking to the audience who come from all those backgrounds. you can't do it by people like you and me. let's talk about one of the specific challenges facing bbc news and current affairs, and that is holding power to account. you've been do

and you know, she should be cool about it. he should be chill. it shouldn't mean that much. and yet it did it did mean a lot to her and she was hurt by encounters that were supposed to be meaningless and feel good and she felt embarrassed talking about that. and so in some sense part of this book is just a legitimating function for me saying no, it's not crazy for you to feel that way. you're you're not the crazy one for thinking that something meaningful is meaningful that you have feelings about something that creates feelings and we should be able to talk about that if we actually want to address the current problems with sex that makes me think so much about shame and you know for the last 20 years. i've been having conversations similar to yours with with college students about these issues and one of the things i've also found is just there's the shame in talking about how you know, people will say i know i'm not supposed to care, but i do care and there's embarrassment that they they can't seem to not care and and so this has been going on for 20 years. i've been hear

host: who should run it? who should run then instead? caller: to be honest with you, i like the california governor. i like katie porter. there's a couple of people in the south that i like. i do like stacey abrams. she just can't seem to get the votes to win. i think there are several. i do like buttigieg. i think he brings diversity to the cabinet. i would like to see more diversity in congress instead of old white men telling me what to do with my life and my body. i haven't had the experiences or the benefits most of them have had it. i think they have antiquated ways and they need to set on the couch. it is not the 60's or 70's. we are in an era now where things are moving fast. they can't keep up. host: you mentioned katie porter. this is from and renew -- nbc news, she wins reelection after days of counting. she won third term in congress after defeating a former state assemblyman. let's hear from jim in new jersey. you say yes. good morning. good morning. yes? there should be an upper age limit? is that what you say? all right. t

should not try on. golovchenko with members of the government and the head of the government apparatus, nor me. as the president is not the head of the chambers of parliament. today we are. maybe we will be tomorrow, but the day after tomorrow we will definitely will not, and we must create this basis of stability for our children, therefore, in no case should these bills be tried on for ourselves. and where will i be tomorrow, and where will golovchenko be? andreichenko or kochanova tomorrow, where sergienko will be the designer and so on, in no case from something like that. it is necessary to digress and form legislation for the future, so that the system is stable, so that no one can shake it. the guarantee of our future, we will leave active life, but we will still live and see. how will it develop a country so that we would not be ashamed in front of children and that we would not leave the problems that we must solve today. to their children, as far as the council of ministers is concerned . well

you should be offended by that.t's insult to the positions you hold and the voters represent. >> ahead open town halls and i told people -- i had open town halls and told people, whatever you want on the floor, without deliberation, and without having any amendments, people were shocked. all of the parties, people were shocked to hear that this exists in congress. pual -- paul? >> you've got here superquick. open rules on all up ropes bills -- appropriation bills, open, boom. a true 72 hour clock rule, before any bill can come to the floor. the third is allowing authorizing on appropriation bills on the house floor, all throughout the design to empower individual members especially conservative caucuses have conservative ideas and individual ideas flourish and get their time on the house floor and land on the president's desk. >> so, it was talked about, more open rules on the floor makes a lot of sense. i think, one thing that is underutilized from the pastors conference committees. we do a lot of ping-pong going b

there should not be -- we are in an endemic phase. there should not be mask mandates.e were trying to crush the curve, we did not have herd immunity. fast-forward to today, 50% of people who called this nation home have been vaccinated or exposed, many more have been boosted. at this juncture, trying to retrofit a 2023 america with 2020 ideas on how we fight the virus is probably a bad way to go about dealing with something that we have so much more knowledge today than back then. >> should covid vaccines be part of the mandatory vaccines for children? mr. pinion: absolutely not. when we have the vaccine put out, the masks, we knew that we were trying to mask children for the production of teachers who were most vulnerable, the teachers have now been vaccinated. many were fired if they chose not to be. the notion that the medical community has done a great disservice by not being straightforward about the science and method we are following, i do not believe children should be vaccinated. parents deserve that right. >> same question. under what circumstances would you

because these provisions, arguably, should be voted on. but they should be voted on separately. one thing congressman hagan's, he made this point very eloquently, the number of you have as well, rules and the way they are structured now are designed to reduce the amount of votes that you have to take. because votes create accountability. the senate has a problem in speeds. i would hope that the peoples house leads the way here and saying, no, votes are what matters. to the extent that procedure can puzzles facilitate those votes, i think to be important. one thing, if there is a bit of extra time to congressman sessions point, about making sure they're stability and how the rules function. one thing that i think it's a very important part of this conversation is dealing with some of these structural elements in the conference. before you even get to the house floor. i know that something ed has thought a lot about, i'm going to push him in front of traffic and ask him to talk a little bit about that. >> it, keep it short, i have another question, please. >> really quickly, on th

what what should should should they what should the government they. should government should they.g the government be getting involved these and involved in these in these and trying sure they get trying to make sure they get settled should be settled or should they be passing more legislation to make it people go on it harder for people go on strike? what would you like to see? think it's always see? well i think it's always a really difficult balancing see? well i think it's always a r

i should deal. it's by no means 1000 norbish long waiting for me as well. dance was cuz i was just a chill nurse for tonight and i'm with him. mid shooting him. well she some fuck coach to. yeah. his knowledge and mostly the idea like who it for now with the quote one of the better come a couple only written most of splish ah, [000:00:00;00] with ah, ah, ah, the watches are almost completely removed from day to day lives to the american people . and so on the american people i believe, if provided are good information left to their own devices, we're trying to on far more recent foreign conclusions and are coming to about world events, right? ah, the headlights are one r t as moscow demands an international investigation into an alleged massacre of russian soldiers who are being held in captivity by ukrainian forces. it's off the chilling footage should suggesting a mass execution and motors on line. also ahead for you this our a 10 minutes away from the block. the job here is to stabilize patients

not go to the moscow patriarchate you should not support pro-russian deputies you should live like a you should join the ukrainian army you should adhere to all the ideals in principle as it is the talent of the european society begins with oneself mr. ruslan i welcome you to the first channel of public broadcasting thank you for finding the time to chat today i congratulate you thank you for inviting me the first question will be about of the state budget the verkhovna rada adopted the state budget for the 23rd year record early on november 3, this has never happened before. 295 votes are not all the votes that i have in the parliament. er, what are some clues to look for? it is not necessary for everyone to find something for themselves that crossed out other priorities for me and for those 295 people who voted for the main priority was the support of the ukrainian army, the ukrainian armed forces, other priorities it was not for me. maybe other colleagues had their own priorities that outweighed spending on the ukrainian army, they made such a decision, so it seems to me that ever

should i continue? i'm already confused about restoring and sometimes just opening the pages. of ukrainian history i am absolutely convinced that a huge number of ukrainians do not even know the names of andermohs, and there are very, very, very, many such micro macros of secondary history from ukrainian to ukrainian history through the lens of russian glasses and ukrainian history simply we don't have one. something needs to be done. maybe it's time to somehow convene academics, give them some tasks, and ask these academics, professors, and doctors to attend some broad discussions in the verkhovna rada. please, mr. volodymyr, what do you think? in this regard, there is no doubt that ukrainian historians should do a great job of telling about our past, and there should be two whole audiences here, one target audience - these are ukrainians. unfortunately, we are witnessing the fact that a lot of ukrainians do not know our past and therefore become some kind of objects for all kinds of pseudo- historical

that should bother everybody. that should bother everybody.think people in some states feel there is only one party whose candidates are actually saying we will make sure that never happens again. whatever that is. i think the best way to talk about this is in the rigged movie. i watched it at mar-a-lago. i said i am surprised. -- education, knocking on doors. the party does a lot of that for you, but this is a joint committee, and what does your campaign do? spent $11.5 million on a super bowl ad. if you could tell me what it was, you get a prize today, the average voter can't. [indiscernible] i think donors are upset to see where their money went. you have to invest in the non-sexy stuff and that begins with voter and election integrity, voter education. some states, people are just standing and saying everything was fine, everything was fair, you are a denier. excuse me, maybe you are denying a central fact. if we have a once in the sentry pandemic and we have a once in this century pandemic compelled election, things were really weird and

why should okay, look, both should we?ry much have our much great to have our discussion. rights lawyer discussion. human rights lawyer khan commentator khan and fiscal commentator emma webb. the webb. just in terms of the relevance this when they go well why well what's the relevance of saying that. oh i wouldn't saying that. oh well, i wouldn't be to have this person be happy to have this person live they have the live in house, but they have the right to come back. it's because she to go and she has to go and live somewhere. and be a somewhere. jessica and be a problem for somebody else. and i help get my head the help but get my head around the idea the lawyers are happy idea the these lawyers are happy to make some political point every but actually every human right but actually then taxpayer everybody every human right but actually then dealpayer everybody every human right but actually then deal with' everybody every human right but actually then dealwith' you1erybody every human right but actually then deal with'

should analyze.urnalists study the opinion of the audience and all together, on the basis of this, create some new knowledge, a new thought, and not only in the development of the president's theses, but also in addition to them last week. the head of state added a pension. i signed the decree already on december 1. we will increase the pension for our people by 5-6%. although i must say, if we consider macroeconomically, on average, something is being done all over the world. mm, pensioners should not be offended by us, because on average i emphasize this is higher than inflation today. i think that lukashenka, as a person, is a little uncomfortable, to put it mildly , in front of pensioners. they still want more pensions. this is completely normal. in general, a dictator can raise pensions to any level with a snap of his fingers, but a professional dictator can only do this within the framework of the system so that this populist snap of his fingers does not ruin the system in such a way. with rega

state should be engaging. and the other reason is retaliation.ny american company that brings in china as a plant in china or selling in china and ringing seven case will be retaliated against by the chinese government -- bringing a 337 case will be retaliated against by the chinese government. that is why many of them avoid this because of the retaliation of the chinese government. in a few years ago we had a digital product that was seeking software that was clearly in violation but because of the way the court interpreted the original statute of the product they did not think it was a problem. i think also we should continue to move forward with legislation that would reduce the use of 337 for the use of ip cases against the american congress. there is something nash hr 5451 -- hr 5451 will change the number of revisions in there including domestic industries which would make it harder and move more of the cases toward unfair practices against chinese companies. we need to do this in cooperation with our allies. the european commission passed

foreign affairs should work harder. because all this refers to a certain influence on russia that can come from israel, for example, where there are many russians, as well as from other world leaders who should be convinced and in fact to try to change the paradigm of all these things, all the signs are that putin is in a hurry because he understands that he has little time. i am worried about certain delays and also because the armed forces of ukraine do not stop actively fighting in the winter because it is in the winter that putin's army will be the weakest because the orcs and soldiers- the zombies of the apocalypse will not want to fight . when it is minus 10 or -15 on the street, that is when the ukrainian army will be the strongest compared to the russian one, therefore winter is our opportunity to defeat them and we cannot give them time by delaying to give time to train more people and more equipment, time is not getting equipment from north korea, because north korea has a million-strong army, which means that

it situation that should be prevailing. it should _ situation that should be prevailing.ountry and not having to bow and scrape to the authorities in that country and last—minute changes like this. that is the _ last—minute changes like this. that is the problem with that, not necessarily the biggest issue given some _ necessarily the biggest issue given some of— necessarily the biggest issue given some of the other concerns about where _ some of the other concerns about where the — some of the other concerns about where the world cup is being held in what happens with migrant workers and so _ what happens with migrant workers and so on _ what happens with migrant workers and so on and is still not a very satisfactory situation, clearly. some — satisfactory situation, clearly. some people will be disappointed. corporate areas and there's the argument with its one set of rules for them in one set of rules for us. the picture of paddington scooting down the banister. beautiful images of been released.— of been released. some beautiful ictures of of been released. some beaut

and i have already said that every public organization should have wings, they should be different, butld understand that there is a large public women's organization. and under her wings. there is some other public organization that deals with a narrower problem, be it again these dogs or cats or mothers, three two eight or some other women's organization, but so that they understand that they can apply to more, well, as it were, to this central organization and they will be heard to help solve some problem, and these small ones. we need to close in order, again, not to to give the opportunity to enter through these small initiatives to enemy forces is a private initiative. yes? the same radislava, well, which is clear they were financed with foreign money. as a result, they turned out to be destructive in relation to the state, so what do we want, if they are financed with foreign money, foreign money comes to the organization, we understand who she works for a woman, for example, who was beaten by her husband, who has nowhere to go to her anyway what money yes the organization gave h

should it be? should it be jurisdiction or changing standards of review? should it be -- heightening the confrontation or contradictions by provoking fights. that might provoke bigger fights in the future. does it look like cutting out the supreme court air-conditioning budget? what does it look like? defending the clerks and tearing down -- defunding the clerks and tearing down in the temple. what does it look like to say the courts are part of the problem, you know maybe to some extent we make better arguments we might win cases. i think that cannot be the whole answer. what we do? cracks on the point you made about congressional retaliation. turning off the air conditioning and moving them to a warehouse in north dakota. you present that as a last line, but it should not be a lifeline. it should be this is a political contest. these are the tools of retaliation. they should be normalized. we disagree about that underscoring. it is a real naturalization of the idea that the court is untouchable entity. that is you are on the road to authoritarianism if y

we should, somebody should write about this.or it's the thing you want to tell your friends at the bar at the end of the week. you're having a beer and light, the craziest thing happened, this is so interesting. it is just the thing that motivates you basically. becca:, kafka. shawn: that's not what we're talking about at my bar. becca: i will call people your bar about kafka. morten: i preferred to be commissioned to do something, and editor to suggest a topic or book, because left to my own devices, i picked 19th-century century danish novelist nobody has heard of. becca: we love that. morten: i did a piece for gawker earlier this year. they sent me a really horrible book by the guy who created parks and recreation. he wrote a work of moral philosophy, if you can believe it. i, never a book i would have thought to write about myself, but i really enjoyed writing about it, not reading it, but writing about it, but i like editors to challenge me to try something else. becca: sometimes an editor can find an author you love too. i

we should take maybe you should we should take over yeah i go work next over disney.t up in the guardian an ancient skeleton unreliable skeleton seems very unreliable so not joe biden. it's another spooky dinosaur . so christie's spooky dinosaur. so christie's the auction houses cancelled a t rex scale at an auction after doubts have been raised so rex scale at an auction after doubts have been raised s 0 £20 doubts have been raised so £20 million this t rex skeleton . of million this t rex skeleton. of course. that's just the bones. you don't even get the flesh with that. but the ground they say i'm in the trouble with with the old skeletons of dinosaurs is very few complete so they just you know they'll have like a femur and a few ribs and they'll fill the rest with they'll fill in the rest with they'll fill in the rest with the plaster paris. but the with plaster of paris. but this will do in this one will do in palaeontology just they don't they don't as i never of them but it raised concerns parts of it looked similar to another dinosaur because it did is it sort

we should take maybe you should we should take over yeah i go work next over disney.t up in the guardian an ancient skeleton unreliable skeleton seems very unreliable so not joe biden. it's another spooky dinosaur . so christie's spooky dinosaur. so christie's the auction houses cancelled a t rex scale at an auction after doubts have been raised so rex scale at an auction after doubts have been raised s 0 £20 doubts have been raised so £20 million this t rex skeleton . of million this t rex skeleton. of course. that's just the bones. you don't even get the flesh with that. but the ground they say i'm in the trouble with with the old skeletons of dinosaurs is very few complete so they just you know they'll have like a femur and a few ribs and they'll fill the rest with they'll fill in the rest with they'll fill in the rest with the plaster paris. but the with plaster of paris. but this will do in this one will do in palaeontology just they don't they don't as i never of them but it raised concerns parts of it looked similar to another dinosaur because it did is it sort

this should be done. it was done three times under the previous president by republicans so there is no reason why we cannot do this again. reporter: you said you would welcome congress doing this. is the white house actively working to get congress to address this in the lame-duck? sec. jean-pierre: as i said before, we are continuing to have conversations. we always do with congressional members. just on a regular basis as we do here at the white house. i don't have anything specific to read out, any conversation to read out. this is something we welcome. we do not believe it should be used this way. reporter: one to ask you about a statement you made about the assault weapons ban. this is probably the best time in terms of moving that type of legislation forward during the lame-duck session, given republicans will take over the house in january. so what is the administration doing to move this forward during this limited window you have now to move the legislation forward? sec. jean-pierre: the preside

it should be warm there, the smell of food should be purely delicious.nutrition is such an important issue, it is always under control, we try to make it tasty and varied at home when the child comes from home. he should feel this atmosphere, and he should not have such a stressful situation. it must be tasty, small children require some kind of additional care. we we try to make the process of adaptation, especially in september, go easily and naturally. today, we have 2386 girls and boys studying more than 800 people. it's just elementary school students. if the strands go down the slope, the tiger's left hand is in place, the edge is in place. you can find us pizza, smarties age, younger students would go from student to student, so we use such game techniques to make it interesting for children. we prepare a hand for writing. well, uh, various exercises like that. uh, logical character, too. we are present preparing for mathematics for writing to the main lesson. danila, show me, hold a pencil. tasya , show me, she's holding a pencil. just closer to

what should have been done?tweeted that link, it seems nobody moved with the speed and forcefulness that was necessary. what was the right thing to have done here? >> the right thing was to hold him personally accountable instead of making vague statements to the effect that of course we stand against hate speech, and hate has no place, anti-semitism has no place. the initial statement from adams over, the initial statement from the league didn't mention kyrie irving by name, it just kind of condemned anti-semitism and hate speech. finally they came around, partly because kyrie irving kept digging himself in deeper. jerry brewer described him as both delusional and defiant. and he did an impromptu press conference with the basketball press the night before last, or maybe it was last night, and he duck himself in deeper with some sort of word salad, and at that point they realized there was no way to distance themselves or try to split the difference, they had to flat out come down on him, and they did. so let's

you should go. how do you get the party there? you know how hard it is, the base of this party still loves donald trump, or do you think this mid tomorrow could break that stuff? >> you know, elections are about winning. if folks wants to look at the election results and decide that's where you want us to be, we're not going to do well. if people look at the election results and say the republicans have established themselves as the anti-woke brand. he we care about being anti-woke. now let's have initiatives that help people's lives get better. i with point to the examples i've been involved in. trials medical building, that legislation has prevented about 11 million surprise bills since it was signed into law in january. that's fantastic. similarly, we can go to the bipartisan infrastructure bill, led by the senate, with republicans fully engaged in making sure the average american, for example, has access to high-speed, affordable internet. we can look at those accomplishments, get them done, bui

the more difficult it will be for him to win the war, in your opinion, what symmetrical measures should ukraine use in the current situation and is there generally a feeling that the united states will help us with long-range artillery systems, so because the war must end as soon as possible with our victory and without long-range artillery systems in particular, without the same attacks. well, it will be very difficult . you are right. i think that the answer that is being proposed now, which is that the attackers continue to move forward , is the best answer that you can give, because now if you start shelling russian territories, you will play into putin's hands and he will then will say that this is a large-scale war or does it need more mobilization more money more resources that is why ukraine is now quite successfully acting and should continue to act just like that moving forward because your moving forward - this is actually what causes to the cracks in their system, the russian army at the front is very fragile and can easily crumble if it is attacked again strongly where it i

this tragedy should never have - this tragedy should never have occurred~ — this tragedy should nevertragedy should never have occurred. there is no way- this tragedy should never have occurred. there is no way thatl this tragedy should never havel occurred. there is no way that a young _ occurred. there is no way that a young child _ occurred. there is no way that a young child being _ occurred. there is no way that a young child being brought - occurred. there is no way that a young child being brought up i occurred. there is no way that a young child being brought up in| occurred. there is no way that a. young child being brought up in a home _ young child being brought up in a home with — young child being brought up in a home with damp _ young child being brought up in a home with damp and _ young child being brought up in a home with damp and mould - young child being brought up in a home with damp and mould of. home with damp and mould of this kind could — home with damp and mould of this kind could be — home with damp and mould of this kind could be considered _ home with damp

we should make china into -- we should make china dependent on our oil. host: once again, the democrats secured control of the u.s. senate yesterday with the election in nevada. the washington post has a front-page story this morning explaining exactly what happened in nevada and where the senate stands. here is what they say. democrats were predicted to retain control of the senate saturday, clinching a narrow majority as they showed strength in battleground states in a daunting midterm year that handed president biden a major victory as he looks to his next two years in office. the final blow to republican hopes of retaking the chamber came in nevada, where saturday, senator catherine cortez masto was projected to win reelection, edging past adam laxalt. cortez masto's predicted wing insurers democrat a 50th seat, with a runoff election still to come in georgia on december 6 that could pad their slim majority. with 97% of the vote in, cortez masto led by half a percentage point. control of the house was still up in the air saturday as vote counting cont

what should the system for candidates be and what do we think of political parties, focusing on should have a california type or luminary election or some other tweak to the primary process. >> the point of what we mentioned in the primary is the independent movement which has the ability to act has not risen up, there are not independent candidates elected in any of those states. not sure where we see the popular demand of this alleged 45%. >> or making a logical fallacy, what you're interested in is independent candidates. i think the independents -- >> an open primary, isn't that what you want? >> there are voters who don't want to belong to political parties and have full voting rights, and -- >> if the republican party wants to have a convention go for it. that is wonderful. i am not arguing we should prevent political parties from doing what they want to do. give them more freedom to decide who to endorse or who their favorite should be although they have from indus freedom. the political process itself should allow people that don't want to be in a political party to participate

investments should go now without waiting for the moment of victory.ow we need money for a quick recovery, for the modernization of the energy system, the logistics system, for the launch of production in ukraine. you are absolutely right that usually countries that are at war do not can hope for independent recovery, but they should fully rely on the help of partner countries. andriyu how do you assess the last month of bullying of the aggressor in relation to our energy structure , how did it affect the country's economy, how much was it affected in business, how will it be reflected in the near future, we can already see from the results of the current business survey, this is already the ninth wave of surveys conducted at the beginning of large-scale aggression and we see the following that a third of businesses were affected by the power outage , it is uh, it is still not as significant losses as the losses we had in march in april, but still, they are uh, but you know no matter how strange it sounds, but the internal enemy inflicts more or less g

therefore, russia and the russian people should oppose shoigu, putin and other people, and this is aategic goal that the presidential administration and the ministry of foreign affairs should work on more persistently because all this is about some influence on russia that can come from israel for example where there are many russians and also from other world leaders who should be convinced and actually try to change the paradigm of all these things putin is in a hurry because he understands that he has little time i am worried because certain delays, as well as so that the armed forces of ukraine do not stop actively fighting in the winter, because it is in the winter that putin 's army will be the weakest, because the orcs and soldiers of the zombie apocalypse will not want to fight when on the street minus 10 or -15 that's when the ukrainian army will be the strongest compared to the russian one, therefore winter is our opportunity to defeat them and we cannot give them time by procrastinating to give time to train more people more equipment frequent receipt of equipment from nor

have a plan in place and should have a plan in place and should have a plan in place and should have to come in. one of the other he thinks that he concluded from his report, one of the lives, one of the 22 people who did die in the attack could have been saved. john atkinson was 28 years old. he was comforted by a man for quite awhile that night. what sirjohn saunders has concluded in report is thatjohn atkinson had survivable injuries, but the emergency services did not get him quickly enough, and as a result he died from heart failure after losing so much blood over a long period in the aftermath of the attack. so there are some very interesting key findings, some very hard hitting findings from what sir john saunders has said, but also his opening statement was interesting. criticisms must not overshadow the admiration for those who did go to the city room, the foyer of the manchester arena, without regard for their own safety that night. he was very clear that those who did go in there where commended for doing so, and that a lot went wrong with the emergency response thereafter

it should have passed. she is also the chief negotiator in the court area so thank you windy. , wendy. and then there is also meredith -- she is a former u.s. trade representative for industry market access, telecom. she also drafted important areas of trade and development act. and the trade act of 2002 area a long career in international trade a lessee. and gil kaplan, my colleague is a senior fellow at manufacturing policy initiative at the university. he is also secretary of commerce in u.s. department of commerce during the trump administration area his former partner -- as part of the international trade group that worked on 337 cases. he filed and prosecuted the first successful case in 2007. ok, so, i think it is clear that a growing consensus in washington after many years of saying otherwise that china's economic technology and trade practices are an their -- unfair, and they pose a threat to economic and international security. good, we are finally at that weight but what do we do -- that point,

what role should congress play to make housing more affordable? nick: amanda? amanda: i have heard about housing from people in the district. again, the price of everything is going up right now. it is not just housing. people are feeling the pain across the board because of poor decisions made by washington, d.c. and by joe biden and that miss davids has supported. we need problem-solving in washington, d.c. right now. one of the reasons -- when we are talking about new housing, we are getting back to transporting goods and the cost of energy, which is a really big problem. every single time i ask any business in any industry, why are you having issues right now, it all goes back ultimately to the cost of energy. nick: amanda, thank you. sharice davids, what is your fix for affordable housing? sharice: actually, this is something that i know folks have been struggling with and things have been really hard. especially coming out of the pandemic, where people were either laid off or unable to work. and from the federal perspective, i think that we absolutely nee

he should ass. jang. so you are yeah. man who. ready ready the shaw show know the saw monet that it all up. no, no leave. you are on the sun. nat g g, a tattered ga if fraud you get it all cali. van model killer jew earhart, a g for the country decided to have a long term plan of going out section, having good relations with the punches. i'd like to work with monetary resources of the. ready is going to asia, a strength military capabilities is developed quite sophisticated. the asian, russia is also an asian country. and we need to develop a military cooperation. similar to what the nature in europe stylish thought a she led switch and ceiling to to so whenever we can let me just share, says up with them for law, which has come systemic throughout and through. all of my groups in young stuff will be in the company with experience for the buttons to grow shedding and not to produce anyone. infrastructure foods with maybe one or 2 cycles for a new job up in kisha furnished. busy the effort or conflict, or that he should, sir. jim s

should be done and should be done first of all in the ukrainian parliament, but so far we do not even see the relevant draft laws registered in the parliament. which cancels lifelong financial monitoring, this is what the title sounds like. what do you think, if this is done on purpose, or is it possible that zelenskyi didn’t even know that this law contained amendments ? is it being done deliberately by the government now or not, ah, i can’t say whether it is being done deliberately by the president or not. did he know? yes, he probably needs to address this issue, but i am sure that the government, well, precisely in the cabinet of ministers, first of all understood the problem because the cabinet of ministers is directly in constant negotiations with the european union, they understood that this would have consequences a-a and actually, at least they should have prepared proposals for the president to veto this bill. but this did not happen and well, i will allow myself to speculate why because, for example, all the current ministers of the cabinet of ministers, all the current peo