it was skeptical. people inside said this will never fly and pointed to the u.s. skepticism. there's been remarkable progress and i think for us it's very interesting to see that die nax mick. one of the things we haven't looked at which we have way back in the league of nations time, one of the dividing lines that made sure their efforts are international lili regulating control fell part was because they didn't have the recipients on board. there's a lot of agreement among the suppliers. there are a lot of recipient states in africa, asia and the americas that are pushing for this. it's very interesting the change there. >> i'd like to go back a little bit to the transfer in the data. you touched upon it a little bit these reactive acquisitions and these small arms races in certain regions that you see developing. i wonder if you could talk a little bit about that, and then i'd like to ask our colleagues here on the panel who are dealing with the controls, do you think that a treaty like the att who is to prevent irresponsible or destabilizing transfers you know, give me, w

so you do have to be skeptical, even if coffin census. science, the reason i feel confident is because of opportunities i've had to interrogate people in the field, not always even scientists. but people who just know this stuff. and the public at large -- >> doesn't have that opportunity. >> they don't know -- >> but you can always trot out one scientist from some college -- >> but this is the problem, this is the bedrom problem of not just this issue, i mean et cetera the bedroom problem we face in sort of the project of self-governance and keeping the civilizational problem going. someone works 12 hours a day, they to get home, deal with child care. they don't -- i have this life. i go to talk to a climate scientist. it cascades down through these trust relationship, right? so those trust relationships are forged, they're not forged on the basis of going back and forth to someone. they're forged on the basis of affilation, of identity, the kinship, the cons nans of world view so someone who fits all of those things says do not listen t

it makes sense to me. >> i am not skeptical. i am optimistic. there are multiple conditions on this permit. hopefully the address the issue. there was a process they went into coming up with these conditions. maybe it is over the top to have to security guards. her nose? it may be perfect to address the concerns. this is an effort that a lot of people put a lot into. as the permit holders rep, give it a go. if we could embed the six months, is that not feasible? >> i am happy to research this question. these are not permits the you could not grant this as a six- month permit. it can grant or deny it. you could not make expire after six months. >> that is not what we're doing. >> you're trying to remanded. -- remand it. the entertainment commission monitors the client -- complaints and would be responsible for suspending or revoking if there was a violation. >> what we're trying to achieve, what i am trying to achieve and i heard the same from other people. some mechanism takes place and we will hear from you again as we heard from everybody else

deeply skeptical questions from the conservative justices up here at the court. if health reform and as individual mandate is to stand, then at least one of those conservative justices is going to have to vote to uphold it and it is far from clear that the oh obama administration convinced any of them that this law is constitutional. >> a divided nation. >> we believe the constitution means something. >> a divided court. >> so can the government require you to buy a cell phone because that would facilitate responding when you need emergency services? you can just dial 911 no matter where you are? >> no mr. chief justice, i think that's different. >> michael was one of the lawyers arguing against the individual mandate. >> i think anybody has to be skeptical about the very unprecedented and unbounded power that the federal government is trying to assert for the first time. >> all three. >> walter is a former soliciter general. >> i think the chief justice asked questions to both sides. >> but justice kennedy was among those that asked whether the federal governmen

. >> so you're skeptical. mike is doing a put calendar. let's refresh and hit open the playbook once more. review this structure. and the strategy you're selling a near dated put and using that money to buy a longer dated put of the same strike. it requires timing. you want the stock to be above the strike of the put you're short by the first expiration but below the strike of the longer dated put that you're long by the second expiration. walk us through this. >> what i'm looking at doing here is selling the april 13 puts. i can collect about 60 cents for those and using those proceeds to help finance the purchase of the may 13 puts which will be 90 cents. all in i will spent 30 cents for this trade. what i'm trying to do is capitalize on the frenzy for "hunger games." after the weekend i think the price of the options drop maybe sharply because they rose 33% in just the lost month. we're trying to capitalize on the accelerated decay, the fact that the news will be out, and i'm leaning slightly bearish as we indicated with carter's charts

justice kennedy was very, very skeptical of the mandate and the constitutionality of the mandate and that makes me feel better alwt chances. s hard to predict what they're going to do, but i can tell you in keeping with justice kennedy's prior decision making in cases wherekevehe decision, skeptical of unlimited congressional power under the commerce clause. so my knd i ha been managing this case day to day. questions with heard from the justices. we feel very positive that the mandate will possibly be struck down. if it is, tomorrow is going to be very important when webekuse believe that if the mandate is struck down, the entire law must fall. so with that, i want to introduce my colleague from texas, greg abbo >> thank you. today we are one day closer to br to the senators who spoke earlier. they talked for years now about repealing and replacing oba i don't think we'll have to worry about crossingng closer ad closer to the court striking down obama care all together. when this lawsuit, we knew it would be a liberty and government. we knew if we could get the court to agree to foc

so many years is open we should use it and activate because political will work of yoga has up to skeptics main concern is that this noble impulse could not come at their worst time no one in syria will set the table of the regime why killing is still going in the streets. and bombing is still going in the cities but suffer i could talk for all i'm sorry possibly the reforms could be an important tool in finding a solution to the country's projected crisis and many more injured done i can describe the situation is painful and we can resolve it together our party is preparing documents for the president and the governor we call on all parties to start dialogue what a military solution and foreign countries have to fear and it will only make things worse we should know and to be and we should start assigning. and your constitution is the latest in the package of reforms that also included believed in of emergency laws and the release of political prisoners of war that has really says these changes could be a double edged sword making the country. stronger also you will ponder about the forei

the skeptics main concern is that this noble impulse could not come at the worst time no one in syria will security with a regime why killing is still going in the streets and bonding is still going on the city is at supper i could talk for unsurpassable leaves the reforms could be an important tool in finding a solution to the country's protracted crisis. and i can describe the situation as painful but we can resolve it together our party is preparing documents for the president and the government we call all parties to start dialogue a military solution and foreign countries interference will only make things worse and we should now intervene and. we should start deciding. and your constitution is the latest in the package of reforms but also includes the lifting of emergency laws and the release of political prisoners. released says these changes could be a double edged sword make in the country stronger but also more vulnerable to foreign influence. iraq people and their salaries are in dollars reels and dramas they want to destroy the country we don't want changes. we cannot allo

to around seven percent a year in the country but you're getting a dog from a of cases tamar is skeptical about these products just doesn't look real unfortunately or with. all the structure of russian economy and mostly resource oriented export resource around the country we are not capable to grow faster than four percent a year for four four and a half percent a year and if it's even possible something disintegration we can see the situation even in the thousands eleven thousand and thirty eight so if we want to grow seven percent a year in real terms we need changes and that's exactly what's not clear. and that's the business news this hour we will be back in fifty five minutes time to bring in our market update of course join me if you can. the the. wealthy british scientists some time to explain. the. market finance scandal to find out what's really happening to the global economy with much cause or for a no holds barred look at the global financial headlines tune into cars a report on our. mission and free the critic a should three the first four judges three. major amongst the thr

what we know is to the extent there is skepticism, and there clearly is skepticism within some portions of the christian faith, evangelical christians are most likely to view it with skepticism. alabama, mississippi is a home ground for those folks. lots of them conservative and religion. but i would say he's probably in the game not because of himself, but because newt gingrich is stronger in mississippi and alabama than he was in texas. romney is never going to get 50% in these states, but he gets more of a chance to split the difference. >> he wins south carolina. he won the panhandle of florida. let's look at the views of those. these are likely republican voters in tomorrow's votes in alabama and mississippi. when it comes to evolution, one quarter of republicans believe in evolution. 26%. very strong. two-thirds believe against it. when asked about the president's religion, this is president obama's religion among alabama, 45% believe he's muslim. 41% say they don't know. similar numbers in mississippi. one in eight believe obama is a christian. 52% believe he's muslim and 36% say

so does this make you skeptical about why they decided not to arrest him or not to go ahead?> no, it doesn't. the interesting thing about this case is, we still don't know exactly what happened in that darkened night encounter. we're struggling. we're looking at little bits and pieces like was he in handcuffs. >> yes. >> as opposed to saying, what's the evidence of the encounter between the two individuals? what happened? >> but something dramatic must have happened for them not to arrest someone -- >> make an arrest -- >> who did not have a gun. >> you know what the default position is for the cop, arrest the guy. >> what could it have been that overwhelmed, first of all, the arrest and the guy he shot didn't have a gun? >> as far as i'm concerned there are two possibilities. number one, the cops really believe that he acted in self-defense. that he was jumped from behind and maybe he was in danger of loses his life or at least he thought he was. or number two, he's wired into the police department, he's a cop wanna-be. he had friends. and they were bending over backwards to

that i feel about the pilot group. >> yes. >> i am simply saying to you that there is a bit of skepticismut whether or not you should acknowledge that you have certain types of problems because the airline management people are not the type of people that generally will understand that. let me give you this little bit of history. back in the day, the chief pilot was a person that you could depend on. you could go in, he was like an uncle, a father, anything else and you could tell him your troubles. they would listen, be compassionate and work out some kind of a program for you. i don't know that that's the situation now with the professional group out there. they very often find that the chief pilot is just a messenger for other management, and that can get you into all kinds of hot water. you know, i'm not -- i'm not promoting or not not promoting the union or pilot group or anything else, i'm simply being honest about the fact that with the skepticism that's out there and stigma that's out there particularly for mental things, depression or whatever else, it would be very risky for a p

. >> so you' >> so you're skeptical. mike is d mike is doing a put calendar. let's ref let's refresh and hit open the playbook o playbook once more. review thi review this structure. and the str and the strategy you're selling a near dat a near dated put and using that money to bu money to buy a longer dated put of the sam of the same strike. it requires it requires timing. you want t you want the stock to be above the strik the strike of the put you're short by t short by the first e but below but below the strike of the longer dat longer dated put that you're long by th long by the second expiration. walk us th walk us through this. >> what i'm >> what i'm looking at doing here is sel here is selling th puts. puts. i can colle i can collect about 60 cents for those and those and using those to help f to help finance the purchase of the may 13 the may 13 puts which will cents. cents. all in i all in i will spent 30 cents for this trad this trade. what i'm t what i'm trying to do is capitalize capitalize on the frenzy for "hunger ga "hunger games." after the a

or has skepticism become so thick as to be, well, too thick?an we be so skeptical we descend into being cynical, or corrosive, or perhaps irrationally negative. i don't like the market today. i didn't like the way it acted, didn't like the plunge in gold. that's been a harbinger of european weakness, i didn't like the decline in europe. i don't like the transports going down seemingly bad today. i do see lots of problems that could see the market lower short-term. including an israel/iran missile crisis that could end worse than our own cuban missile crisis. still, i come back to thinking we have become irrationally unexuberant. i've got to do more than that. i must show you the differences between now and last time we were at these levels and we should've had the wand out last time. so you understand why this generation's current bubble heads are full of hot air. all right. first let's tackle the dow. all right? let's deal with it. in 2008, we traded above 13,000, the excitement, it was palpable, we'd be giggling back then! we figured to make

is there anything indicating option activity that there's skepticism about the ability to go up to 60-plus and beyond? >> good question. >> no. i can't wait to ask that analyst that we have on in just a second, zach, that same question. clearly the stock is screaming to the upside, and we have bets being placed significantly higher than the stock six months from now, even three months from now will be significantly higher, even though that machine won't be in stores until september. >> let's bring in the analyst from credit suisse. he's joining us to talk about this. the initial reaction from a green mountain standpoint was decidedly negative, it was off 20% or so. as you read more through this, is this more about something being good for starbucks rather than just negative for green mountain? you know what i mean? it's an espresso machine at the end of the day. it's not a direct competitor to green mountain, is it? >> the lines are a little gray, but that's right. it's a high-pressure he is express seo machine. it's more about being positive for starbucks and negative for green mount

you'll also find those who are skeptical about the possibility. >> if this doesn't work out, the nextears are going to be tougher. >> it's not going to be the magic pill. >> most of the skeptics are critical of what the redskins traded. >> to give three years straight first round picks and a second in this one, i think it might have been too much. >> despite those sentiments, there's no denying washington has just been pumped with a new kind of energy that has been missing here for years. >> rg3, baby. the heisman trophy is coming to town. >> at a news conference earlier today, redskins general manager would not specify by name who the team is interested in. he would only say right now they are in love with two specific players. dave owens and the sports team will have more coming up later in this newscast. for now, we're in chinatown, 9news now. >> more envelopes had white powder showed up in washington today. this is federal authorities continue to investigate a man who they believe sent 100 threatening letters this week. armando trull has the latest developments. >> there was anoth

he seemed to express that skepticism about just how broadly congress can mandate people to purchase something but he did say that health care is different than buying a car. it is something everybody needs so he could be the key vote. >> we will have much more on this at 5:00. court proceedings wrap up tomorrow. that is the latest outside the supreme court. back to you. >> today's poll question -- should the supreme court uphold or strike down the president's health care law? we want to know what you think. way in on our website. go to wjla.com. >> a lot more news coming up. disgraced former imf later dominique strauss-kahn tied to a new sex scandal. how it is linked to washington. >> diabetes control my life. i was worried i would die. >> it could be a breakthrough in the fight against diabetes. the surprising a possible cure for obese diabetics. >> and a $363 million question for you -- what would you do if you won the lottery? >> dominique strauss-kahn is once again involved in a sex scandal, but this time, he is facing charges of procuring prostitutes for hotel or two parties in paris and

be skeptical. do your best to tell people to not lose money. no free passes.ll how to do our jobs right, even if it means being a curmugeon when everyone around you is celebrating what is for them a joyous occasion. stick with cramer. >> i like it. you have a couple of dreary days, and everybody thinks it's completely over. things are rolling over. the market is no good. the breath is bad. all right. listen. we've had a huge run. you mind if we take some profits? it's okay. it's what happens in real bull markets. you know something, i good bull market actually has some sell-offs in it. it isn't just like this

certainly justice was highly skrept ska skeptical.can the federal government force free americans to buy a product. will is a very basic issue of freedom. >> let's go straight up to dana bash. is that the buzz, republicans think the supreme court will do for them what they don't have the votes to do on capitol hill, and are the democrats worried? >> largely i talked to several republicans who were smiling as they walked back across the street here to the hill after they were in the courtroom. and i heard a lot of what you just heard from senator johnson, that they didn't think that the administration did a particularly between job arguing for the health care law, but more importantly, they were very pleased with what justi tice kennedy said. they were happy with the questions he asked and comments he made. they thought it was very much against the health care law. but it's very interesting, not everybody was giddy. and hold on to your hat. i know you'll talk to michele bachmann soon. she actually said something very similar to what th

and he had several other skeptical questions. now, the government has been saying that it's not regulating the insurance market, it's requiring the entire health care system. and when the conservatives say, well, if congress can do that, can it do anything? the government's answer has been no, because the health care market is different. everybody has to get health care. there's really no other market like that, because even if you don't buy insurance, even if you can't afford health care, if you show up at the emergency room, the government is required to give you that care, and that's not true with buying food or a car or something else. so the government is saying the health care market is different. at the very end of the argument today, justice kennedy said, well, maybe there is something to that argument. maybe that is the health -- the health care market is different he said that's what concerns him. so i think he's sort of showing his -- the problem he has with it, but it did seem to indicate that he's open to that though

and the iranian, incidentally, do the same thing flechlt very skeptical about obama. they did to the dare to take a risk for peacemaking, similar to the risks that they are taking for the status quo of the confrontation. >> jon: it's really how you show an weave it in really well all the narrow self-interests that each country is playing their hand with. and now difficult it is to balance those. so it brings us up to today as a lot of people i think are starting to feel like there is a new groundswell from our politicians for really moving hard action on iran. that there is another deal that was about to occur with iran's nuclear program. what is that deal. >> i describe in the book, i did a lot of interviews with almost all of the different ackers involved in this, ranging from the israelis to the obama administration officials to also the iranian negotiationers to gets their perspective. but also turkey and brazil. because at the last moment in 2010, may of that year, right before the administration almost managed to get sanction sanctions at the security council, t

this is a case about the individual mandate of. >> reporter: and justice scalia seemed to walk his skepticism back suggesting if the individual mandate goes, so should the whole law. >> it's my approach would say if you take the heart out of this statute, the statute's gone. >> the individual mandate looks doomed to me and the whole law is in some trouble. >> reporter: swing vote justice anthony kennedy suggested picking and choosing between sections of the law would dump billions of dollars in additional risk on the insurance companies. >> that it seems to me can be argued at least to be a more extremer and size of judicial power than to -- exercise of judicial power than to strike it as a whole. >> reporter: the courts liberal went the other way suggesting it would be far more intrusive for the court to throw out the whole law than to leave in place parts that have nothing to do with the individual mandate. >> why in a democracy structure like ours where each branch does different things, why we should involve the court in make the legislative judgment. >> reporter: if the supreme court thr

city casing his bird wings. >> i'm skeptical. >> i'm not. >> he was a little suspicious about this guy. he didn't look to me like he had the upper body strength to fly under human power. >> this video has ignited a debate. the folks at gizmodo spoke to george lucas' cgi mastermind, several of their cgi masterminds seem to think this is, in fact, fake, calling into question the quality of the video. they say, okay, if this guy can build a pair of bird wings and invest all the money in that process, don't you think he could also invest money in a really great camera crew and maybe some nice equipment? they're also calling into question the physics behind it. there are other videos on his site and cgi specialists looked at these videos and they're calling into question different shadows. they're looking at different angles, and thinking, okay, this is actually cgi. burr they're saying if it is fake, they did a great job. but the folks at yahoo spoke to myth buster star jamie heinman and he thinks it's real. >> i didn't know he thought it was real. i love that guy. >> is he saying that it'

obama acknowledged the skepticism. >> we've been there for ten years. people get weary. >> reporter: the president also repeated tough talk regarding the standoff over iran's nuclear program. >> the window for solving this issue diplomatically is shrinking. >> reporter: prime minister cameron warns syrian president assad to cease the bloody crackdown on his own people and step down. >> international law has a long reach and long memory. the people leading syria at the moment committing these crimes need to know that. >> reporter: a united front between old allies facing pressing challenges. kristen welker, nbc news, the white house. >>> this is andrea mitchell in washington. they are both young, smart, devoted family men with the world on their shoulders, looking like two friends trying to blow off steam, but this duo travels better than most. marine one to air force one then a motorcade to an ncaa basketball game. if it was david cameron's first hot dog, you couldn't tell. he wolfed it down getting points from the nation's number one basketball fan. >>

so i'm very skeptical of. for instance, financials, even though i'm skeptical, i'm not involved. goldman sachs, very sharp reversal today. i'm much more concerned about the price of the stock than some editorial from a disgruntled employee. >> why are you still fighting the tape, though? you've been negative on the market for a while. >> yes. >> we had this 200-point move, the market keeps having a melt up and you keep melting down in at least your strategy. >> i've been clearly wrong skeptical of the market but i'm not short. the first is transports. transports have woefully underperformed the market. they are today and they have for many weeks. i am a believer in dow theory. it has not worked over the last several weeks but i believe it will work. when you see the rails trading the way and the shippers trading the way they're trading, i think that is a massive warning sign for the risk on move. the second reason, which i think is more compelling and newer is the gold trade. this break in gold i think is very, very material. it tells me that financial markets are starting to tak

do with this skepticism?l, it is unclear how that skepticism is going to effect this case. it depends on how the district attorney going to present that to the judge and how the judge is going to weigh those arguments. under the announcement of the plea sheriff ross mirkarimi agreed to one misdemeanor count of false imprisonment of his wife eliana lopez. in a friday story published in the chronicle district attorney gas son said he questions mirkarimi's sincerity in his plea because mirkarimi said he agreed in part to an individual mounting legal bills. during today's hearing the judge will have to consider those factors. legal analyst dean johnson says a defendant can plea for any number of reasons. >> mirkarimi himself is not required to admit that he did the crime or describe the crime that he did. >> to remove mirkarimi is not a slam-dunk. there is no guarantee that the board is going to vote to remove him if it gets to that final step. >> reporter: university of san francisco political scientist says may

what we know is, to the extent there's skepticism, and there clearly is skepticism about mormonism within some portions of the christian faith, evangelical cristiahristians ar likely to view it skeptically. mitt romney acknowledges that was his problem in 2008. he spent lots of money in iowa and couldn't break through the evangelical christians. alabama and mississippi is kind of a home ground for those folks. lots of them very conservative, religiously minded electorate. to cynthia's point, i don't know how romney's not in the game here, chris. and i would say he's probably not in the game because of himself, but because newt gingrich is stronger in mississippi and alabama than he was in tennessee and oklahoma. and if gingrich is stronger, he splits that vote with santorum more, which gives -- romney's never going to get 50% in these states, but it gives him more of a chance to split the difference. >> i agree. the news has been very strong. if he wins south carolina, wins georgia, the panhandle of florida. let's take a look athe views held by likely republican voters. these are likely r

a lot of justices were skeptical. the conservative justices, justices appointed by republican presidents -- one of them would need to side with the liberal justices to uphold this law. every single one of them that we are watching to possibly be a swing vote -- all of them expressed some skepticism. most of it was is this boy to be a slippery slope. if we make people buy this private product from a private company, does that open the door for all sorts of other things? chief justice robert saying does that mean we will eventually require people to buy cellphone so they can call 911, or people have to have their real insurance, or are required to eat broccoli. -- burial insurance >> the question is about the size of government. >> even if it is healthy, does that violate individual freedom? the government counterpoint to that is everyone is a health care consumer, regardless of whether you have insurance or not. if you do not have insurance, you are self-insuring. if you are hit by a truck, you go to the emergency room

a couple of skeptics here. we want to have you with me the entire hour. so we'll come back to you and talk more about investing in this environment. thank you very much. barry and vadim, we'll get back to you. we're awaiting the stress test results from the federal reserve. we'll have full team coverage and instant reaction to everything we hear out of the federal reserve, that's happening in the next 15 minutes. >>> bob greifeld with us, giving us his reaction to the big rally in stocks today. and whether we are seeing a turning point in investor sentiment. as we take a break, take a look at the highlights from our guests today all day on cnbc. >>> it's where the value is, and i've talked to them about things like pepsi, and proctor & gamble as an example. >> the problem is, the compliance, the bsa issues, all of the regulatory issues are incredibly expensive to small banks. now, that should help ultimately. >> you look at the consumer surveys, more government policy is bad than good. so there's not any confidence that we can really solve the problems. g