was the event, i will say frankly, my subjective point of view, in terms of content, the column in snn is not an event, there is nothing sensational, nothing groundbreaking about it, here is the article from the economist, it became very popular at that time. a big event, it was, as many wrote at the time, a cold shower from the point of view of assessing the military situation, and there was content, well , let's say this, there was a meaningful view of what how to get out of the trap of positional warfare. now, from the point of view of such a general understanding of the philosophy of the next war, well, yes, an interesting text, although about the fact that drones should be used, that this war is turning into a war of drones. well, for six months , all the military experts have been saying it, and he himself, the self-employed in the previous column for the economist, he seems to have told me about it too, but vladimir , what matters is the context, when, when this text appeared, under what circumstances and on what kind of background, that's right, that's what i'm talking about, t

experts who know the entire background of changes in the approaches to conducting hostilities, and why snn indeed, let's put it this way, there is a question as to whether there were political insurance factors in this after all, that in particular there is a question about the removal of zaluzhny, about his replacement, and then zaluzhny, conditionally speaking , somehow trolls those politicians who believe that conducting hostilities is a simple matter, that you can come to the battlefield, distribute tasks, and there the military will run forward, he wants to possibly raise the level of the discussion to such a level that this white noise is related to the fact that fighting is simple, that he all- still stepped aside, and then the introduction of hostilities really came to the fore. which requires certain.

cannes base in jordan, snn reported. then three servicemen died.th korea tested super-large combat cruise missiles and a new type of anti-aircraft missile in the yellow sea. the country's authorities announced successful tests. it is said that the tests did not have a negative impact on the security of neighboring countries. let me remind you that experts have confirmed the use of the russian federation. a missile of korean production in strikes on ukraine. hungarian farmers will resume protests in ukrainian the border in a week. they oppose the continuation of the preferential trade regime with ukraine by the european union. earlier it became known that polish farmers will block the border again, as reported by an independent trade union. solidarity of agraria plans to start a nationwide strike on february 9. it will last at least a month until march 10. the reason for the protests is the passivity of the polish authorities, as well as statements about non-compliance with all decisions of the european commission regarding the import of agricultura

know the entire background of changes in the approaches to the conduct of hostilities , and why the snn, really, let’s put it this way, there is a question whether there were political insurance factors in it after all, that in particular there is a question there about the removal of... zaluzhny, about his replacement there, and then zaluzhny, conditionally speaking, something so trolls those politicians who believe that the conduct of hostilities action is a simple matter, that you can come to the battlefield, hand out tasks, and there the military will run forward, he wants to possibly raise the level of the discussion to such a level that this white noise is still connected to fighting simply, so that he will leave after all to the side, and then it really came to the fore in... conducting hostilities as an art that requires a certain potential, and certain knowledge and certain opportunities. in a certain way, of course, well, it is hard not to notice that there is such and such a correlation, that processes are taking place in ukraine, and there is already a look into the politica

the whole background of changes in the approaches to the conduct of hostilities there, and why the snn , let's say this, there is a question of whether there were still these political insurance factors in it, that in particular there is a question there about the removal of zaluzhny, about his replacement there, and then the industrious one, relatively speaking, somewhat trolls those politicians who believe that... conducting hostilities is a simple matter, that you can come to the battlefield, hand out tasks, and there the military will run forward. he wants, perhaps, to raise the level of discussion to such a level that this white noise is still connected to fight simply so that he still moved aside, and then it really came to the fore in...

it is not about what the column of zaluzhnogo in snn says about his strategy, what is the difference in approaches between them and by president zelensky, professor of international security at the university of birmingham, stefan wolff, told the bbc. in his latest essay, zaluzhny writes that advanced technologies, especially unmanned vehicles, are now playing a leading role. ukraine very successfully uses drones both in the sky and... at sea, and zaluzhnyi strives to better integrate this into ukraine's military doctrine. this will require better funding, more flexibility and better training. his ratings are higher than even zelensky's. more than 80% trust zuluzhno. sub-70 is also not bad for zelenskyi. but there is a difference between their approaches. and this, to some extent , led to reports of alleged disagreements between them. this is not only about personal rivalry, it is important to... realize, this is about the difference in the vision of the general strategic direction of this war, in my opinion, the meritorious to a greater extent a realist, better understands what is p

place, well, why not it was possible to predict that zuluzne would refuse and not take this week, which snnhis resignation will happen this week. in a word, it is clear to me that the scenario probably did not go as smoothly as it was wanted, it is clear to me that it is flying. mistake, i have no doubt about it, i i don’t understand, to be honest , what the people who say, maybe they will lose their minds, who will lose their minds and what they will lose their minds about, as you can imagine, you are the president, i am your military man, military right-hand man, chief adviser on defense issues , you call me, tell me about my resignation, i refuse, and then we continue to cooperate as if nothing had happened? it happens, it does not happen in much more mature political institutions, and obviously it cannot happen in the banking atmosphere that currently prevails in this yermachatnik, who started talking about ambitions a year ago, and again in ukrainian history, the history of ukrainian presidents, such a situation was repeated more than once, when, for example, tymoshenko was conditional

experts who know the entire background of changes in approaches there conducting hostilities, and why the snn, really , let's say this, there is a question whether there were all these political insurance factors in it, that in particular there is a question about... the removal of zaluzhny, about his replacement there, and then zaluzhny, relatively speaking, something like this trolls those politicians who believe that the introduction of hostilities is a simple matter, that you can come to the battlefield, distribute tasks, and there the military will run forward, he wants to possibly raise the level of discussion to such a level that this white noise related to still fighting simply to he still stepped aside, and then it really came to the fore in... conducting hostilities as an art that requires a certain potential, and certain knowledge and certain opportunities. in a certain way , of course, well, it is hard not to notice that there is such and such a correlation, that processes are taking place in ukraine, and there is already a look into the political future, who will be who after thi

prospect of entering the crimea and so on and so on, who, if, we can see from the last article of the in snn everyone understands that this is a person. well, even if he didn't write this article himself, then this team, a team that knows how, that has a strategic vision, that knows how to prepare a strategy, that knows how to fight, it showed it. zaluzhny, unlike zelenskyi , entered history as a positive figure, and if we compare him with our historical figures, then he is already on the same list with svyatoslav khorobry, with khmelnytskyi from... compare zaluzhny with bohdan khmelnytskyi, let me remind you that he signed bohdan khmelnytskyi, well, this is a topic anyway say longer, when we piled on everything. i am talking about the military successes of khmelnytskyi, when the ukrainian infantry was the most successful. well, okay, if you want, let's compare the industrious man with napoleon. napoleon won three major battles against the russians: austerlitz, friedland and barodino. won three major battles in the 22nd in the north, east and south, and conducted a successful offensive near