society. in this regard, i would even give an example of the draft law, which will now be considered in the second reading on the foundations of civil society. this is also the first example and the first legislative one, which essentially provides a theoretical basis for the relationship between civil society institutions and the state. the question is unique the originality of our history of our path, which is a very difficult event, often being in state formations and political centers were not located on the territory of belarus , belarus retained this self that we call identity, and we should be proud of it. and this is actually the heroism of our ancestors. the academy of public administration under the president became a platform for holding a seminar, organized and online broadcasted by teachers, students, across the country were able to connect to the discussion. electoral code navy political parties civil society, the most important bills that modernize the architecture of the politi

so this society is overheated by such people.est, it is for the sake of one, look, you have in this overheated orthodox society there, which is offended, and therefore there are, well, then we look. yes, there are residents of the south-east of the west, there are unfortunate kherson residents, who are some of them waiting, who thought it would be good now, it became so bad, what do they say, now we are waiting for russia to stop. earlier it was like this and look for the japanese why do i bring there are different parts of the society of ukraine but at the beginning of uh, february 24 - this society was united as one, uh, there were impulses of fear , they really had a single hatred, and now what remains is that you can only feed hatred. kill uh, make more kill water, but it doesn't work anymore. this could work when the propaganda of the ukrainian and ukrainian authorities said that if the cities were liberated by the villages, then what are you talking about now? it does not work and the only thing that can work. god forbid, i

as a society so personally and the worst for people so completely true vitaly noted that the so-called ussr is more of a myth than a reality well, we have experience even in the 80s, i studied at the pedagogical school at the university, we studied the problem of the so-called afghan syndrome. it was 1988, 1990s , that is, the afghan company ended in 1980-9, and at that time i even remember the figure that if you take the equivalent of 100, then and cases of e-e consequences of criminalized consequences of combat trauma per 100, only one case of criminalization, that is, there are 100 people injured in combat conditions, only one of them is criminalized, the rest of this trauma is transformed, on the contrary, into reverse processes, it increases the sense of dignity of justice and the desire and thirst for life is on the contrary, that is, these people become even bigger, many times bigger, er, bigger defenders, defenders of their family as a society, and they strive to live, they give birth to children, they create goals, yes, but not according to those statistics, unfortunately for

it is difficult to imagine how society. can get out of this crisis. only if something happens.this is in the hands god it can be like cataclysms. any cataclysms that shake the human mind when people are looking for ways out of a situation where the absence of a way out means death. in the face of such cataclysms, a person can change his thinking and can remember the value system that came to us from above and working in which a person can only remain a person, and human society can exist. therefore, this is the only way, but to rely on the fact that through some kind of evolution from evil they will come to good, this a beautiful-hearted and very far from reality attitude to the future here, or really difficult conditions of life that will make a person think about a lot, as happened during the great patriotic war in our country, the conversion from atheism to the faith and in general, what a strong country came out not only in the military morally, how strong we all came out like this either well or either means those who live in this terrible paradigm, where sin is mixed with

in fact, we do not have a one-voice society. we have a multi-voice society.ces must exist. let them talk side by side, these voices are competitors of each other, they are even companions of each other, but they are not enemies of each other . we are against the republic islam must raise and as an alternative to the islamic republic, it needs all voices , identities and formations to be present, to speak for themselves , and to be the ballot boxes that determine who gets the most votes and the shape of it has the least votes, and we all surrender to the people and learn that our future democracy will be without respecting each other, without recognizing each other, without the presence of different identities at the same time, without actually being integrated. at the beginning of the revolution, mr. khomeini said, "all together, and you could have all." bring it, but everything has gone wrong with me, in fact, we should not make this mistake in this period we must be careful that in fact this issue of different groups of different tendencies is not a sign of

it is difficult to imagine how society itself . can get out of this crisis.ng happens. something, and this is in the hands god it can be like cataclysms. any cataclysms that shock human consciousness, when people are looking for a way out of a situation, when the absence of a way out means death in the face of such cataclysms, a person can change his thinking and can remember the value system that came to us from above and working in which a person can only remain man, and human society can exist. therefore, this is the only way, but to rely on the fact that through some kind of evolution from evil they will come to good, this is beautiful-hearted and very far from reality attitude towards the future. here either the really difficult conditions of life, which will make a person think about a lot, as happened during the great patriotic war in our country, the conversion from atheism to the faith and in general, how strong the country turned out not only militarily in moral terms, how we all turned out strong that's either so well, or means those who live in th

yes for any society. um.urrent events should be a lesson that the world can be broken very easily. but to return to it completely, completely. not just quite right, but this is the task of our society to keep the peace. and what can everyone do here is a public union? yes, each person, what can be done in order to save it? it is necessary, firstly, to understand others, to make compromises, because healthy compromises, sensible compromises are the key to holding peace negotiations in all areas, both in our society and outside it, therefore understanding and respect. how do you feel about the phrase? if you want peace, prepare for war, and do not complement each other complement each other, because e strong state militarily strong states. that will deal with everything that's the whole world is easier save. yes, i fully supported oleg viktorovich, and i supported this saying once back in the 19th century there was such a very large russian. the history of the philosopher, nikolai, he substantiated in his book

i'm living mean of the society i'm living in. that's something that i really would have value and they get me wrong. i think international solidarity is really important. so i am glad that i got the understanding of what was happening abroad, but it shouldn't have come at the expense of learning anything about what was happening in this country. the in the ending march 2020, there were around 46000 recorded offences involving a knife and in london, the metropolitan police has warned that 2021 is on track to be in the worst year of teenage killings in more than a decade. as a response, the ruling conservative party has called the police to be given way to power. while many journalists in the british media is a gang label without factoring in the all the reasons that lead to define it. to me, you've spoken about the importance of the distinction between the gang coach. i knew violence. why do you think it's so important that that distinction is understood, developing an understanding of how particular labels are used to fathom marg

and you, if we talk about the life of the society of the state, so that positive changes take place inhe life of both society and the state, so that the people become more consolidated, if we are talking about difficulties associated with dangers from the outside, so that people really consolidate, so that they appreciate more what they have, so that there is a desire to protect what they have, well, to improve their personal social life, therefore, difficulties are given to us, perhaps in order for us to become stronger and better. it all depends on what thoughts. with what aims of positing do we meet these difficulties and struggle with them? to meet my difficulties for a ribbon, as we say, to the front line, but a huge number of military priests left. they are there now and many of them have died. here is one of them, mikhail vasiliev, he is worthy the title of hero and russia in yours. what do you think, how important is the presence of the priests of the russian orthodox church today. and maybe a friend in other broadcast confessions is also there on the front line. the priest doe

society society does have a request to change this cultural policy.n bookstores other books about e. well, here are the verses, there and so on i can say how person every week who walks into bookstores. i can yes, in the center of moscow, to several stores, which i visit every week like this. uh, it's only the blind who ca n't see the changes that have taken place in our bookstores. e, according to the nomenclature, what is called yes, and even in prominent places near the cash desks, e, books of our colleagues friends, there are poets and so on, they became visible before this was not at all, i will support you. you are very correct. here, i would say this very clearly for this year. and by the way, what you uh say is confirmation. this thesis is a very clearly formed request or order or the topic of requirements from the majority of society from the majority we can say with confidence that this is the majority of our society. this is an order to change the cultural and educational policy within a very specific framework. now, as managers , ministers

yes , it is your society. in my opinion.o today are not enough ready ready to do it and will do it. these are not empty words. so here continuing the day informing. everywhere will not reach, but the question. and why do we then need the same deputy director for ideological work and how we appoint them to a person who simply reads this manual aloud. he probably shouldn't be in this position. it is rightly said that an ideologist is a piece of goods. well , the word is such a commodity, but this person must be unique, i understand, you won’t find such people everywhere , so we need to think here how to inform, maybe, uh, and dishonor, uh, with these events. let's go one day let's do it. there are three and a half thousand meaning. let's hold some basic seminars. and then these people that will come will disperse and will tell. we have become so. uh, here in minsk to introduce seminars for ideological workers on the basis of the academy of management. where we invite bright interesting speakers. why do we forget about online i

we are a civil society, civil society actors of a public association of political parties. and, of course, now we are adjusting our plans in accordance with the message that was proposed by, uh, the head of state. and i am sure that this year will be full of significant events for this and our uh, brand uh political culture. i'm talking about dialogue platforms this and uh, hmm large scale events that will be held and states and civil society, and both individually and interacting with each other, as a center, i think that all attention will be focused on ensuring all the same . security in our country. e, as you remember, in the updated constitution e, we introduced a norm with the class that the republic of belarus will never be a source of military threats to others. this is very important. here we emphasize the peaceful character. even our anthem, we belarusians are peaceful people, and that's it. this adds up to a common such a paradigm. here we once again emphasize to the whole world that we remember for peace for security, even in political and international issues.

how much will it help further moral improvement of our society.is difficult to say, because, in fact, morality is a very inner human dimension. and this is how external laws can affect the internal state of a person. this is a big question. it seems to me that , of course, the spiritual factor, the upbringing of culture, primarily influences the internal state of a person, but why these laws are needed, the state determines its attitude to these phenomena, they cease to exist. eh, what is called a certain norm, that is, what they appear in other societies, the state does not repress people, but it declares its moral position. and this is extremely important, and the fact that today russia is a russian state, the russian government has taken this position, this indicates that moral issues. questions of the spiritual life of people are not indifferent to the modern russian authorities. well, and therefore, of course, all the forces of evil rush. in this case, not only the church of the priests, but the representatives of the authorities, but i think

and ukrainians are such a horizontal society. in i trust my neighbor's lieutenant, my neighbor, my neighbor, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, i, my, my, my, i, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my, my , this is already such a long conversation because the russians, everything they write on their banners is a lie , that is, when they say we are a broad hospitable people, they are very not so broad and anti- hospitable, you see how they behave, these are people who do not trust anyone except their closest relatives and maybe the closest ones don't trust one or two friends in this society, this is important to understand in our society of trust, because you don't organize the maidan with mistrust, and you won't be able to push it away from kyiv, from kharkiv, from kherson, because you have to be friends with those people, trust them, understand that they are you they will not set up the front on the front left and right they have to hold each other because otherwise well, a breakthrough o

the operation does not imply such a massive involvement of the people of society, when we say that societyart in this conflict, and not only in new territories, but also in russian society, and more and more is included in this confrontation to call it a narrow technical such a point operation language does not turn not in afghanistan, nor in chechnya, nor in the first nor in the second, but in the chechen company. we did not appeal to the people, did not involve these huge masses in this confrontation, therefore , i think that's something. uh, as he said, wonderful. this is a man, yes, a simple one, huh? the person who speaks, but he is not quite simple, he is a candidate of medical sciences, and in general, a well-known study. that's fine, but in any case, a person who was in prison, who is engaged in a specific specific activity. he tells us, in fact, a kind of metaphysics, just world history that our confrontation with the west. this absolute existential conflict. an ontological conflict is a conflict between two mutually exclusive, if you will , mutually exclusive civilizations. we co

this is society.sciousness with many political parties is a very topical issue for belarus now, the development of political parties, and so, with many political parties there are appropriate educational or research funds. okay, next question then. here is knowledge in the ussr yes it is created after all not only public leaders, yes, but even screens and heroes. yes , through the same outstanding actor balala yes , a favorite of women, yes, that is, there were sixties , but knowledge in recent years has not had bright public leaders. here, ask a question on the street. yes, they will not even name the leader of the knowledge society, either the soviet union or the belarusian republican union, and in the twentieth. i don't remember them either. here. why do you think the president entrusted you? become a media conductor of knowledge well, in society well, i think that it came together right away several factors, but first of all, yes the first part of your question. uh, they didn’t know the leader, ma

i plan to take russian and er, society or english.y good, because compared to previous years it was very difficult. it's much easier. it takes place in the form of performing test tasks at special points at points for passing a centralized exam. delivery. a-a students, and student registration statements making applications for students, all this will be done by the school, you still need to take centralized testing in only one subject, do not forget also about the average school scores, and that 2 c + 1 ct + ballateta and the characteristic is provided by the new system and gives additional bonuses for olympiads and talented youth, for example, this year it is proposed to hold university olympiads in regional universities and their winners will be entitled to enroll without tests, entrance tests are clearer and easier for each perinata are aimed at innovation in the outgoing year centralized start exams. on may 14, russian or belarusian will be asked, and another twenty-first of may, there is already a choice of subject for schoolchi

and in our society as well as in early society. it's a really potent political force. right. it is a currency of source a source in politics. but gossip is often neglected. right. as a kind of historical source as a primary. so what is it about gossip that makes it often by historians in terms being studied of times like this? is it really one trail that can be proven right? so it's not necessarily it's certainly not easily verifiable. right. it's it's much harder to verify. jacki, like your own personal bias, whatever you say. so it's not really reliable. yeah, right. so certainly, i mean, especially in the context of this, right. we can see the ways in which it isn't reliable. gotcha. going off that a lot of the stuff that says hearsay. so so credible. yeah right. so lots of questions around the credibility of the source even from a practical standpoint. think about a historian who wants to utilize gossip. what's the kind of challenge there? sarah usually it's like spread orally, like people talking to one another. yeah, it's really hard to identify, hard to locate, right t

much like other learned societies, and institutions, especially the royal society in london on which it was modeling a lot of its activities, the aps had a few ways that they thought to do that. so, first a plan to meet regularly and gather information from a network of correspondents around the atlantic world. and probably scholarly articles about the research. they planned to form a library, and finally, they established a cabinet. so, like other early cabinets of curiosity, the aps cabinet healthy wide variety of types of objects. and are barium of trust plants, natural specimens, anthropological artifacts, and other objects that were sent from around the atlantic world. the aps was not alone in developing those kind of collection alongside its library. so here in the greater boston area, there were numerous examples of this pattern. so the american academy of arts and sciences, the boston -- the american -- a society and of course the nhs. all these institutions had patents it looks very similar to the one at the abs. around this time, harvard college also had what was called of

society in america. we were founded in 1791 and for the past 230 years, we have been collecting and preserving, making accessible the history. massachusetts in america. we maintain a fabulous research which has a collection of close to 14 million manuscript pages. and these include the papers of mother soldiers, artists, activists as as three u.s. presidents. we make this collection available, the public, for free. and we also a wide variety of programs such as this evening's our program season is wrapping up for the year but we still have a couple programs left. next monday, we will host our film club and this one will be discussing the film. good will hunting, and we'll be joined by tim kraft, who is the former deputy deputy director of the massachusetts film office, as well as missy stewart, a film producer and designer who worked on good will hunting. and then wednesday will host the grim keys. the legacy of slavery in an american family with greenwich from tufts university and i'm sure many of you k

i told the human society that the society can be based on religion and the world if he builds himself, he can cover all aspects and needs of the society by placing religion as the center of action , he cannot combine the world and the hereafter and put this world on the background of a happy hereafter. well, these ideals were not realized in the eight years of war imposed by the enemy, after he continued these conspiracies and seditions in the movement of the hypocrites in the currents and conspiracies, he is looking for the revolution that left the period of stabilization of development and these eras to not be able to have its effects, but in this war of wills, god favored imam's companions, with their pure blood, with their effort, with their struggle, i tried that these ideals can be known to the islamic society and the human society, and today it has many blessings for our country and our system , thank god. it was not our noble imam's desire, you know that the imam, like the politicians of the world , who used to ask the people in the form of rituals, was that the people really

well, this is also an element of the fact that german society and european societies in general, maybey exception will be france, but this is not a fact, i don’t know french very well. most likely not, because it really does not speak arabic there. no, well, not yet. well don't overpraise it no in the sense that france does not know arabic well, i really forgot seriously, but in order to travel to france, apparently, in 5-7 years it will be necessary to update it. such a person was not in france precisely because i do not know french, soon apparently this is a problem will be resolved, but in france there are still some elements in germany , you need to travel with vladimir a brilliant turkish one. and i think that it is already possible now, so it is possible, but the problem is, what is it? and the fact that confession, while preserving the forms of democratic institutions, does not even form, and the name of democratic institutions. we got an absolutely totalitarian europe, not just russophobic, that's okay, russians have always been disliked there. and in the nineties they did not

but also military aid, but what concerns tanks, even unfortunately, society society is divided and therewhere around half of the citizens of germany, they believe that in germany there is no need to transfer german tanks to ukraine because, well, it is not because they are pro-russian or anti-ukrainian, but because they are afraid that it will involve germany in this war but why exactly these leopards and not everything before and whether the next one is rationally impossible to find out, it's just like that, the current opinion is that supposedly these tanks are something, uh, something else. this is something unlike that heavy equipment that we have previously transferred to ukraine, for example, these anti-aircraft firecracker tanks that work very well in the country, but now with these leopards there is such a public opinion . probably it will be a little now it is inappropriate to say, but in general, the mood has been developing very well in the last 11 months. there was a time when, in general, the germans believed that it was not necessary to give some kind of weapons to conflict

but do you think a society's whole think it's a society's a whole in a pluralistic society?on't should be important. i don't think think there think objective. i think there is obviously truth and that's something that and our society we've sense of hence why we've lost a sense of hence why we've lost a sense of hence why we so issues and we see so many issues and especially among young people . especially among young people. but i, you know, i'd like to say that in my generation i see lots us returning to more traditional and especially, you know which can be found in the christian faith . peter, are you faith. peter, are you a religious person yourself? yeah, i'm of the church of i'm member of the church of england clearly what england and i think clearly what came the census i was came out of the census i was mixed. but what i would also say is christianity was still the largest group in by miles. it's dipped 50, but also christianity is growing globally. there's a huge of evangelical churches in africa and partly in america as well . of course, there are well. of course,

what does that tell us about the way that our society is one? i for heart broke him like most people about what happened. i gram foul, and i think for me, it symbolizes the neglect the abandoned men. and that's something that resumes with me a lot because i come from a community and my estate again neglected abandoned, and left to ra, entity, re a and to me grown folk speak to that because it's more important for this. i sort of a block to look pretty for, but other wealthy people that live near it, then it is for people who have the right to be safe in their own home. it's really interesting speak briefly at the same time because there are lots of overlaps from what you're saying. but tammy, you said to me the other day that no one's coming to save us. we're gonna have to do this for ourselves. so your position slightly outside the system and your thinking of possibly pursuing a career in politics, right. and trying to effect change from inside the system. why do you still have faith in the system? also, all of the things we've spoken about wil

i think that that was true and the american philosophical society. i think it was definitely true at the nhs as well. right? i mean, i think this idea of publishing publishing or work and promoting it in. that way was really important to any of these institutions that were kind of trying to collect and record information whether that was a natural history or american history in terms of funding. i mean, i think that many of these institutions tended to be privately funded so really until you get to the smithsonian so i think and even that was the result of the quest to the us government by james smithson, so i think that from the start of the question of funding has been really tricky one within the united states for is museums and you see a lot of them evolving as private institutions as a result. lots to say that question. i think that's such an interesting question. i just have to add because it's something that i've been thinking about a lot as we annotate the next volume of the atoms papers here. is that john adams is the president of the americ

about the russian soul about the open society about the ideology of the open society of which open societyturned inside out , the functionaries of the open society point to what we open quotes russia in its policy in the international arena focuses on the promotion of traditional values. what goes against the western world order and understanding of human rights? what human rights? what human rights are you talking about, good lord? and the rights of our olympians. about the rights of our paralympians what rights are you talking about? a wonderful, very insightful little article by sergei bogatyrev, i will read an excerpt from it short paralympic athletes were nevertheless suspended with a standing ovation. perhaps it would be difficult from the west come up with something else so that every citizen of russia, even the most apolitical, even the most neutral, if he didn’t reach for the handle from a shovel so that the ipc ivada could solder, he would think about western civilization as a personal enemy. moreover, enemies who have no honor of unworthiness do not deserve a drop of respect or

and russian society.and stop the so-called stop, the so-called hot fra-phase. conflict in ukraine, mr. patrushev said that even if this happens, the confrontation between russia and the west will not end. let's separate these two things, because when colleagues talk about winning and are forced to talk. i understand what you are saying, i understand what you put into the term victory in ukraine they don’t talk about victory for ukraine they say it victory in the west they don’t talk about victory they talk about the defeat of russia they say that uh the confrontation was like a lot of two, but in general, the other word for the term is no victory, what does he want? ukraine clearly, zelensky spoke about this more than once. i am talking about the official position, because, of course, there is danila, in fact. we have a lot of idiots from the fact that the war is going on, the number of idiots in ukraine has not decreased. and, on the contrary, she grew up and comments on someone. well, no one. you're rea

imagine that society stands on a foundation.f you take away this foundation, you will destroy the whole society. and when they hit the family, when they made the rule that we have to accept same-sex marriages. i said america will go. i don't know if it's going to happen in 5-20 or 50 years, but america will collapse in just a couple of months in september. 2015 i received a russian visa and flew to russia alone for the first time and began to study what and how in terms of what is possible, i would like to live here. then i came two more times and finally in 2017 i flew here with my wife eight children, that's where we stayed. it would be a blessing if i always tell you they are not bailiffs, for example, you have a newspaper in which you see photographs of a man. at first, just walking down the street, then someone comes up to him from behind, pushes him to the ground, beats him and, of course , in the newspaper he starts talking about evil. a man attacked this innocent citizen, but you are not told that half an hour before thi

, or is the society the first to order, he will lose the war if we are our society will to we will winhe war absolutely any way you like, and that is why this article does not make sense, it is not clear for whom it was written , who is the target group, who should read it as soon as possible . what did you read in nine countries, vasylovich? in nine countries, european studies were conducted, and 48% of europeans believe that it is acceptable that peace could be achieved even through territorial concessions of ukraine and that is, european society has already become numb to the war, and maybe putin is counting on someone else to kill some more influence. you see, there is no peace party in ukraine, according to medvedchuk, please . the negotiating table, that's all , everything is our party of peace, you know. at the same time , officials in the united states of america said that putin decided to push to the end. and we will also push to the end and are ready to support financial weapons there. holy people who will say yes have made ukraine a platform for geopolitical showdowns , the

, or is society the first to die he loses the war e

chairman, deputies today, we are considering a very syn sative, sensitive issue for ukrainian society, an issue that can be said to be overdue, namely the issue of the loss of deputy mandates in full accordance with the provisions of the constitution of ukraine grounds by four people's deputies who represent the russian political force, which became a parliamentary force based on the results of the 2019 elections. at the same time, initially large-scale aggression, and especially before the beginning, when we heard favorable reviews about russia on various television broadcasts. services of ukraine, the president of ukraine , in full accordance with the law of ukraine on citizenship, recognized such persons as having lost ukrainian citizenship under the constitution a person of ukraine who lost ukrainian citizenship terminated ukrainian citizenship through loss loses the mandate of a people's deputy of ukraine, therefore the political party servant of the people will certainly support this decision, this resolution on the loss of mandates of people's deputies of ukraine by persons who

well, there is a civil society, it has arisen and it works.reactions to various phenomena that are relics for another 100 epochs. yes, until the twentieth year, the authorities hear, as with the latin let's say , or with some other manifestations? of course, the authorities must carefully observe, that is , they must not allow confrontation, that is, they must react. we must understand to solve problems, as if they arise, well, glory god, this is what is happening. and if those people who return want to join normally , then everything will be fine for them, no problems. they will not create, but they can politically express their opinion through the legal forms of the party, parliament, elections, and so on, so this should never concern officials, who betrayed the official everything, this is a traitor who is impossible all over the world. yes, from the changes of the state the second point that we must never forget. i totally agree, but we've been declared war. she has not been officially declared and this war will not end ahead of two seriou