and she's just tired already, moreover, society society after all when i was asked to deal with her. the second floor. he had four floors, and even after my ten sessions. she began to run. she became energetic and, uh, those people who expected to receive inheritance after her. they made it so that it was hidden. naturally, well, yes, there really was a struggle for access to the body and their real estate, yes, which later everything was torn apart, but here are the shots that are in the archive, she is with you valery valentinovich elzin happiness of longevity, well-being only on the steps high and long, because we must strive for this, and i wish you this with all my heart. believe me. here, with all my heart , is the person who heals people, and they read this one like that, we don’t need them, but you are a great person. you are a great person. oh, honestly, i want to say. i catch your waves very clean and light, he does not let these well in, no. how did you determine your mission in life for yourself, you know? uh, this is a chain of accidents that allowed me to understand that

so much on the german government as much as on german society well, probably also on society, because society felt that something was not right afteriticism of the german president, did you have problems with access to the highest leadership of germany to me there were no problems with access. but again, what is the issue of access, uh, an ordinary ambassador there in peacetime, for example, and not only the ambassador of ukraine in germany, if you take even the ambassador there of france, britain or the united states, he does not have access to scholzem, that is, he is with him it does not meet, it is not accepted in the same way with vsemayr, there are also exceptional ones there in some very cases , the minister as well. is there a political level or a higher diplomatic level? that's why i have access to those people who were needed by me , who made decisions and who influenced, again , except for the chancellor, that is, but my uh, that's our society, oleksiy makeev, now he's also an oskantsor i have not met and it is unlikely that i will meet because well, it is such a well such a car, but i still have good contact with many m

society and russian society will receive both ukrainian and russian mothers, stop talking and bury. enough. enough understand, wait, we once believed in your cattle. after which your brutes officially declared yes societyrainian. bastards if you can, all nazis were nazis. now ofiget can not me. no pancake, and what's with it? there are nazis here, i don't target your nazi. then you do not spit on russian russian in russian. they tighten it up. but with the russian, which we will deal with ourselves, in order to show the ukrainian for a moment, let the ukrainians go now to unite the ukrainian society. let him deal with the ukrainian nazis. in the meantime, you support and applaud for these songs. your heard for me to say man in no case will it end the victory of the nazis must be achieved. there is such a term draw horseradish draw horseradish, as said, dear vladimir because this is not a war. don't even call it, this is a war. that means i'm okay again. you bastards lied to the minsk agreements after so many years. you say that we did it on purpose to deceive the russians, to pump up the allies, listen, we chose the second moment. which option will you scream? or will you listen, please, to the minsk a

, so that they do something for society, receive a mandate after that, if they do everything , then they are supported by society, if they they do something wrong, societyt support them, and you and i see and understand that if the poetic force came to power, it gained 50% plus in the elections, and after that, before the war, it had a rating of at least 10%. then, in my understanding, society gives its assessment and says whether i am something, this political force is still doing something wrong, then the level of support drops from 50+ to 10 minus and that is exactly what they had before the military events before the war in ukraine and there is nothing wrong here if someone is engaged in pop , passes laws that the country simply does not need who lead the country into fornication, and the necessary laws are not adopted that would allow people to live in a democratically prosperous uh frankly honest life mmm sorry, with a perspective for yourself and with a perspective for your children in future generations, such a political force should be supported i have criticized and criticize and will criticize any political force that if this political force

with the fact that he wanted to express some kind of indignation towards society, yes, and somehow oppose himself to society, afteras in the words of my client, like, after all, we find out that he had a conflict with the employees of this institution, but the investigation considered that this was an insignificant reason, according to his lawyer the defendants repented and, even before the verdict was passed, paid compensation to the victims for the debauchery arranged in the bar. well , you can't buy your own reputation. she's corrupted, an article judged by non-fans of electronic pop music provides for up to 7 years. the incarceration of julia is facing. valentina lyubimov and sergey efremov vtentova did not appreciate the trick of a young man who did a back flip from the roof of an electric train in the metro, the metropolitan police detained the teenager and delivered the station for a conversation, we recall, at the end of the last weeks seventeen-year-old young man. at one blue station. branches, the subway climbed over the transition barrier, jumped onto the roof of the train and did somersaults. then he d

society. after all, they identified themselves with our society.f the fact that there they dug up some nonsense next. what does this play mean? this author misbehaved. it's not like he said that it's all bullshit and so on. so, let's change these texts, don't just say it, then, then, the idiocy of the republic no, say it. this is our phrase. she's not. it is completely written there and skinned for honest work. i looked and chose a crooked detour. but our brother is not far off here either. now i don't know where to turn. it's getting colder than the cold he leaves. this is how you will follow her about things, my soul, my uncle. yes, this cattle scoundrel is his mixer, born gift of cunning and leaves shamelessly seduced the queen. what a fall here, but quieter? i'm in a hurry in the morning, stop talking. why do you have such a bitingness, like a bad paw , tension is created in the auditorium. and with what a yawn there is a loud phrase behind the scenes, then experience. here you completely remove this tension. this is very spoiling for yourself.

society. i really want this respect to remain. after years in ukrainian societysoldiers, for veterans who will go through the war and will continue to serve in the future, everything should be elites , in fact, the army should have insurance , a powerful state is being built. my opinion is that you mentioned the united states of america, there was a movie recently released about ukrainian american football players who went to the front or do you already have any feedback or has anyone offered help, and we actually have feedback. this is also quite a unique story. my sister. she moved abroad at the beginning of the war, and i ask to france. i ask how you are doing there, what do the french think about the war there, and she asks me listens do you remember because in the conflict of the series i remember says and what did you think about the syrians you were there with your soul you somehow felt sorry worried cried helped donated well frankly like most probably say the same why i remembered this story because when 10 000 km and somewhere there is some america and u

military there, it is respect, yes, for veterans first of all in society, i really want this respect to remain. after years in ukrainian society, for our soldiers, for veterans who will go through the war and continue to serve in the future, it should be the elites , in fact, the army should have an insurance system powerful state. my opinion, well, you mentioned the united states of america. there was a movie recently released about ukrainian american football players who went to the front . do you already have any reviews or did someone offer help, uh, we actually have reviews. this is also quite a unique story. my sister, she is on at the beginning of the war, she moved abroad and i ask to france, she asks how you are doing there, what do the french think about the war there, and she asks me, listens , do you remember because there is a conflict in syria? syrians, you were there with your soul, you somehow felt sorry, worried, cried, helped, donated, well, frankly, like most probably say the same , why did i mention this story, because when 10,000 km and somewhere there is some america and ukraine that are at war, what can

society at that time. racism in the united states has been the norm of society since the appearance of the first black slaves. in america, after the civil war between the south and the north, when the last southerners won, the veterans created the ku klux klan , not everyone knows that there are three periods in the history of this organization and at first everything was not as scary as one might imagine. at first it was such a club of interests. yeah a club where at in general, we are still quite active people tried somehow. there fun to spend fun and forgot to spend time. they didn't have any specific goals. moreover, for some political purposes, moreover, this is the ideology of racial intolerance. she, too , was not in the clan at the first stage. well, it wasn't, like , um, like, like an important element, yes, which united all the members of this organization, whites, hoods and robes, members of the ku klux lan used to scare people, including blacks, as the organization expanded as it grew, well, the members are considered to be at the peak of their existence. first doll. he included about half a million six hundred thousand, the maximum figure is up to 800,000 people, which means predicting to pursue some. political goals, that is, began to oppose the federal government. ah and began to try to discredit in the first place. ah, the democratic election process to keep activists out. uh. well, including the exit of the included movement to participate in elections due to political terror, which deployed in general activities against blacks. well, or is it correct to say african americans, ah, during the elections of 1868 , only 2% of the black population of all who could vote practiced lynching courts, strictly speaking, this is extrajudicial reprisal. uh. here is considered, that klanovtsy. ah, they caught, uh, black black african americans. ah, for some crime. well, or at least went in some kind of crime. and outside the court some reprisals were said against them, mostly they were hanged, but it could be accepted absolutely wildest forms. well, for example, in america at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries, after the first class had come to naught, which i will talk about, a little later , various postcards or photo postcards were popular, on which, for example, a hanged man is hanging, there is a group of white people. and such postcards could be sent, uh, by relatives. this could be accompanied by some other signature, for example there mom i'm there the third track yes nothing they were subjected to about 4.000 people, most of whom were blacks. and only in 1981. and what is considered to be the last official victim. in general, here are such, uh, such a lynching that uh organized such a relationship, uh, a black youth, ah, but only in 2020 only 2020, if not even in 2020 the second year, literally this year, and in america , lynching, that is, pancake, was separately criminalized by many terrorist attacks, and this began to cause concern in the federal government soon. the first ku klux klan ceased to exist , it is believed that since 1871 the first plan of its active activity was stopped, that is, separate cells existed in the eighties and nineties. why did the business stop? kustan zapulin is unknown, the next spam doll will appear only in 1915, but it will become a very massive organization. and where at the peak, and the number of which at the peaks will reach six to eight million people, it will be an organization of the national level, but returning to the first corn. it is also important to say that, of course, it was accepted. here 's the civil property law the first year in a number of southern states passed laws. well well known. we also remember the laws of crow's bench press, which in fact completed it , were remembered by aggregation. well, that is, that we were not allowed to use white public transport, or occupy only certain places. ah, respectively, the restriction for visiting the library of stores due to the fact that the situation was before there was a toilet for a man, a woman, nothing. and these laws are macro, but they generally existed in the american societyntil the mid-fifties the beginning of the sixties, but this racial hatred, well, as the latest events of the channel show, perhaps i did not expect until now the ku klux klan officially does not exist, but according to some reports , there are still groups of rastists in the southern states who call themselves klantsemons .

society , in my opinion, it is simply necessary to turn to the constitution of ukraine after the discussion in society, it clearly defines our priorities for integration into the european q7 nato and we must stop this return to the discussion . or maybe let's do something differently, differently today, ukrainians they don't see i think that you have sociology figures about supporting ukraine's course in the eu, nato, no worse than me, but my question is somewhat different , so you actually did, knowingly or unknowingly, a great service to the muscovites who quote you declaring that the tragedy in the dnipro, which occurred as a result of the rashit attack, was caused by ukrainian air defense systems. i have seen quotes, including piskov's, with reference to your words, and of course that based on this, ukraine could not, in my opinion, convene the security council un on this matter and to speak and again demonstrate the crimes of brainwashing that are today in ukraine , but i have something in a different matter. so when you dismissed the president from the office, although it is not clear how you can be a freelancer and write a statement about the release is probably a new jurisprudence, but i'm just wondering if they at least thanked you in the president's office in the context that the discussion surrounding the events in the dnipro actually diverted attention from all the very difficult and difficult events that are happening at this time under soledar and bakhmut and in fact well, i don't know if it's good or bad, but for sure. well, all the attention of the society from the discussion, which could be quite dangerous. the question for me is whether they thanked you for this, or they don't see it, or on the contrary, it was planned that way, and more. there is one thing that i am also interested to hear: knowingly or unknowingly, you deceived the ukrainians in the beginning after the start of the full-scale invasion, when they talked about the fact that the war would end quickly, very quickly. well, in this context, without quotes, but the meaning was clear at the time. first i didn't say anything about now , we need to create the word now we added i didn't say anything about now

society after february 24, this is a fact. and we were convinced of this once again when society went to show me where society went to defend moscowests, where did it go to defend? martial law and not because it is limited by law. but the fact is that there is really no one to go out and because people and those parts that really believed in them that they really mean the church or that they mean there is a measure or something else they now understand everything and that's why there's no need to play because i'm absolutely responsible for the decision to cleanse ukraine once and for all from all these representatives, everything, everything, the fifth column, she is political there in the verkhovna rada, it's called this pzj, they climb into religious life, calling themselves orthodox the church, but all this is just the fifth column, but actually in relation to the ukrainian orthodox church, will it be possible to purge those parishioners of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate, who are now representatives of some part of ukrainian society in the parliament, because they vote when necessary, like this for exa

society of villagers and farmers and spider-man, it is the low income of the peruvian society, and it is good for the one-eyed state of turkey and socialism after his mother came to work from his entry into the legislature of the same congress. it was possible to cheat in the presidential election, my cousin famous in latin america, the children of the implementation of the country's policies with people of nature said that in fact, the recent opposition, in fact , we had all of these examples of the opposition of the congress in the country by the parliament and the working class and the two lower classes of the mining community and the lower class of the peruvian society. at work, a socialist representative, and in fact a representative who thought that he could actually defend your rights in this power play , was also dismissed from this congress, who believe that if he is to be dismissed for any other reason, my relationship with mrs. elaha nouri the expert on latin american issues was interrupted that in the connection with the political crisis in peru. explaining. thank you very much for your cooperation with today's world. god bless you. in the past, there was no time for sewing. there was no cold food in this season. how much should they eat? normal food. good bread, fermented from good wheat. it is very important . i should eat olives with little salt in the middle of my meal. strengthening ripe apples is a good food. seedless grapes are the food of grape juice in iran. there are 229 grapes. god says in the qur'an that a person should pay attention to his food. the believer does not tell a man the example he sets . first, you plant beans, which

ukrainian , it is possible to build the society to which we aspire and when we in society will ask ourselves the question and what do we really want, what kind of state after a lot ahead of us there are still many battles that we must win in international courts, in particular that we are all criminals to be brought to justice, that is why such a complex question is here . speakers listen to russian music, moms with birth are taught to speak russian my neighbor switched from ukrainian to russian, i don't know what the truth is from, from which region if alina fursa is this, the author of this comment will write what it is, what region it is, it will also be interesting to listen to mrs. olga herself these people you talked to are people who left their places. but they remain in ukraine. or are they people who left abroad? is there a difference? between them, these are all those who stayed in ukraine. and no, i have people who did not stay. of the status of internally displaced persons, those who are already looking for a place of residence abroad in various countries, in northern ireland, in austria, in germany, great britain, and those who survived the oc

society in which you have for a society in which you have responsibilities after responsibilities to look after yourself family, not yourself and your family, not just responsibilities , just social responsibilities, not state, to look after not the state, to look after everything. work is everything. that hard work is really important , that savings really important, that savings are important, and that you can't look to the state to do everything for you . also, of everything for you. also, of course, a lot of people have been distracted. we're going to come this later healthy come to this later on healthy ends. they've been very ends. and they've been very alarmed by the by the extravagant and unjustified language used by a lot of language being used by a lot of the green wing, language being used by a lot of the green wing , which suggests the green wing, which suggests that is an immediate that there is an immediate crisis or an emergency , that crisis or an emergency, that they've got to do something about. and i think that nobody i don't see anybody out there from the government actually making the government actually making the case for a conservative societythey haven't done society, and they haven't done so for years. so it's hardly surprising people drift off and believe the things they are being told when they're not being told when they're not being given the other side of the case. yes, i believe in typical concern of its own values, if you want to call them that personal responsibility, small state, tough law and order and all the rest of it. but many people will watching this. people will be watching this. they share , you in they might share, you know, in principle, there's principle, laurie, there's values, but they're shouting at the . good. yes, michel, the screen. good. yes, michel, i would love be responsible for would love to be responsible for myself. love to have myself. i would love to have savings. but the cost base that people have, their mortgage is obviously inflation . all the obviously inflation. all the rest of it. it's making it to the point that even if you want it to have conservative values, you would struggle.

society, we are stripped drawing up a much longer—term problem for us as an and how we look at after the future generations of society. at after the future generations of socie . ~ :, i. :, at after the future generations of socie . ~ :, :, society9 and 2015, they did nothing to help. she is using the anonymous name tina to share her stoy. she says her husband beat her up and forced her into prostitution, the abuse going on for eight years. we're going to play a clip now from tina, who is using a false name, and a warning that it does contain distressing content. for yea rs for years i had to do as i was told. it was days, weeks, months. i reported it to greater manchester police and they didn't do anything. i was suicidal when i went to them but they still didn't do anything. let's talk now with lauren saunders, head of policy and research at the anti—slavery charity unseen. lauren works closely with survivors and is joining us from their head office in bristol. thank you forjoining us on bbc news this afternoon. unseen, what does that tell us of this issue of modern day slavery?— day slavery? modern slavery as a crime is very _ day slavery? modern slavery as a crime is very unseen. _ day slavery? modern slavery as a crime is v

after men. okay. off does origin presence in booking. you got a white why? the dissatisfaction with the presence of french troops and among civil society, those in civil society. i mean that there's been an accusation that that france has been complicit with those that it's meant to be to be fighting. i mean, i was cretins to give to those allegations. absolutely. in fact, what happened is, as the big affair assume, bakken, which was meant to fight terrorism, and in fact, to neutralize it. i've been completely failing from this prospect. and it's been a lot of surprise in the eyes of the african public opinion, as i definitely can not understand. the reason why such a modern and a technological army with lot, sofa or armament to deploy, as been absolutely unable to cope with a g. heidi insurgencies, and what happened is that there has been a growing a trouble in the public opinion and also lots of floods, surveys, brilliant in france, as having itself, critique terrorism or in a, in a western africa. and as a feeling it's rises and fight it. and dis kind offer of for pluck terry's have the met a lot of success among the senior society so called pantry kenning

really after the publication, and i are directly connected with her because well, in the very statement of the state leader, it was about what ukraine is doing right, that society, civil societypurchases , including military ones. that is, it was there separately, and that is why for me this is a very important confirmation of the fact that, well, western governments, the western government, it is much smarter than we thought, because i also think that the number of those who were afraid if we would be misunderstood, well, if our fight against corruption is taken for the fact that we are just once again , they testify - they testified to the corruption that the rashists will somehow use it up to no, i got it

after all, he is preparing even at the level of the state. and we are also trying to keep up with this issue. we are civil society objects of civil societyc association political parties. and, of course, now we are adjusting our plans in accordance with the message that the head of state proposed. and i am sure that this year will be full of significant events for this and our uh, brand uh political culture. i'm talking about dialogue venues this and uh, hmm, large-scale events that will be held by both states and civil society, and both individually and interacting with each other, as centers. i think that's all, attention will be focused on the fact that after all. ensure peace and security in our country here. e, as you remember, in the updated constitution, we introduced a norm through which the republic of belarus will never be a source of military threats to others. it is very important. here we emphasize the peaceful character. even ours, we belarusians are peaceful people, and that's all. this adds up to a common single such paradigm. here we are again we emphasize to the whole world that we remember for peace for security, even

really after the publication, and i directly associate it with her because well and in the statement of the head of state, it was said that ukraine is doing the right thing, that society, civil society monitors state procurement, including the military. that is, it was isolated there, and that is why it is very important for me to confirm western governments are much smarter than we thought, because i , too, am one of those who were afraid that we would be misunderstood . they will use it somehow. no, i got it and the russian media , that is, even the russians could not present this story to the discrediting public , so they tried something, but it didn't work . tanks, we finally got it, it's an offensive weapon that will lead us to victory, and now it is very important to fix on the fact that, in theory, the rats do not lead to such large-scale devastation when we don't have money for fuel for the russian soldiers , well, that is, we need money to fight for a very long time. now, the big task is to get the guys there in the trenches of the armed forces of ukraine we destroyed the occupiers. and we destroyed our internal companies because they are as much a threat to the existence o

society there was no fear of military defeat literally from the first days of the invasion, but the fear one thing that permeates different social strata of society is common to all - it is the fear that after the war everything will be as it was before the war. and this cannot be allowed, because then it turns out that everything is useless. and why should we talk about ukraine right now after the victory? four reasons: firstly, it is a picture of the future, it collects and directs social energy, everyone who is losing spirit, and this is today , everyone is taking a risk, and everyone, after seeing a picture of the future, can raise a little bit, secondly, we need to show a picture of the future to our international partners who will finance the reconstruction and modernization of ukraine, of course they want to understand what ukraine will spend money on . those who left will be taken here, and of course the fourth reason is that the window of opportunity will not be too wide, it will be small , as always, one must be ready to implement all this, that is why there are a number of public initiatives aimed at understanding today, and not just understanding, but writing out documents of public policies and what will happen after the victory, and it was in this hotel today that a large process of dialogues about public policies began . meetings, and here in general there are a lot of people who participate and participate in this, which is why more than 220 public organizations signed the civil society declaration on the principles of e of post-war ukraine, the principles of ukraine after the victory, the so-called luhansk declaration well , because it was before the lugano conference , but i think you will like this play of words someday we will announce it in our luhansk, and what exactly should ukraine be after the victory here, the important vision of millions of people and a- and in principle, after oleksandr matviychuk, there is little to be said here, it is obvious that first of all democracy, er, a small copy of russia will not be able to stand up to a large copy of russia, and i think we are all aware of the fact that ukraine has stood up because it is a democracy, because it is different in nature, and it is very important not to become a dragon after killing a dragon, but we are talking about the future of ukraine, let's talk about the future of russia, because a very important question arises. what is a ukrainian victory, and a strategy theorist is without allegard answe

society, vulnerable part society, vulnerable being parents who have to look after children . you have to look after children. you know what? we've just done a story for mark. why all of these teenagers who are involved in criminal gangs, we've got 100,000 children never went 100,000 children that never went back after lockdown, back to school after lockdown, missing system where it missing from the system where it is. are ethics and the is. where are the ethics and the morals of these teachers to say of course, we would all of we? of course, we would all like more money. we'd all like more money, but for now, let's give these run at an give these kids a run at an uninterrupted period of school without this . anyway, without all of this. anyway, thank rishi sunak thank you. right rishi sunak doubles down on plans. thank you. right rishi sunak doubles down on plans . a bonfire doubles down on plans. a bonfire of 4000 pieces of eu legislation, which are still lingering. this will politically be very popular with at least half of the country. do you think, mike, if it ever gets done, there has been so about brexit right now. i hold my hands up here. i didn't vote in the brexit vote. okay. because i genuinely didn't know whether i was going to damage the economy or, improve the economy by saying get out or stay in. so i took however after took a step back. however after brexit, the brexit vote came in, democrat actually, i said, right, if we accelerate let's go for it. i don't think in seven years we've done one signal. difficult thing to give us an advantage , but brexit should advantage, but brexit should have brought us we followed the trade . we haven't got rid of trade. we haven't got rid of this bonfire of european, which should have gone. we still unstick like the european court of human . i mean, it's utterly of human. i mean, it's utterly ridiculous and i blame the politicians in not control the blob, because we all know the civil service in this country can react slowly or speed , can react slowly or speed, leigh, to the instructions given by the political masters , by the political masters, depending on what they think of it . clearly the civil service it. clearly the civil service didn't want it? we should say it will be, but no doubt be talking about pmqs today. this these proposals will allow nearly all remaining retained eu law to be either repealed or absorbed uk domestic law by december 31st, 2023. yeah, i don't feel like his heart is in it. kingsley, i don't know about you, but he's proper globalist. he's rishi sunak. and i think he'd quite like part of the eu. like to remain part of the eu. yeah, i'm there's yeah, well, i'm sure there's a lot of truth in that. i mean, it goes to execution political will, execution will, and it's execution capacity. government capacity. and this government shown time again that shown time and time again that they execute that with they can't execute that with these slogans, get brexit. you're being a plus one. they were they were elected on that mandate. what do you agree with it or not? that was the mandate. they were elected, so they have to to be doing or saying to be seen to be doing or saying something. yeah they don't. they've got no mandate as to whether wants or they can. whether he wants to or they can. i mean, i think it's just too much effort. i think this is going to be too hard for the mp on both sides of the house of commons don't want to anyway determine it. most determine try and stop it. most of house of lords when goes of the house of lords when goes to them will stretch it out because they don't want as a majority of labour peers in the house lords. and quite house of lords. and quite frankly i'm the will to frankly i'm losing the will to support brexit anymore people. the 55, 54% of people now say they want . i totally agree . what they want. i totally agree. what do you think of the red wall. think now they thought, wow, this is all going to be great in cabra and then we free up all trade so the whole new trade laws. so the whole new world opportunity will open world of opportunity will open up the north england , up across the north of england, the north—west the the north—west and the north—east. that has north—east. none of that has happened? no. well, i think it's very difficult to distinguish between of between the brexit effects of brexit the effects of and brexit and the effects of and covid but anyway , guys, covid as well. but anyway, guys, a off now the break a great kick off now the break and be joined by three experts in their field to discuss. and be joined by three experts in their field to discuss . we in their field to discuss. we handle the outbreak of coronavirus and what we would do differently of differently in the event of another pandemic. that's after your news . five. thank your morning's news. five. thank you. good morning. it's 10:32. you. good morning. it's10:32. i'm bethany elsey in the gb newsroom. the rate at which pnces newsroom. the rate at which prices are rising has slowed for the second month in a row. but the second month in a row. but the cost some food has hit a 45 year high. figures from the for national statistics said the rate of inflation fell to 10.5% in december. that's down from 10.7% the month before. falling fuel costs were largely behind the slowdown, with average petrol prices down by 8.3% a litre since december . the litre since december. the government has pledged to halve inflation by the end of the yeah inflation by the end of the year. but chancellor jeremy hunt year. but chancellorjeremy hunt says there's a long way to go. any country, anywhere in the world, inflation over 10% is seeing it at frankly dangerous levels for the stability of an economy . but for levels for the stability of an economy. but for families up and down the country, they are seeing food price inflation of nearly 17. and that's causing massive hike in the cost . the massive hike in the cost. the weekly shop. and that really shows is that for us and for other countries the most important thing is to stick to a plan to bring down inflation for thousands of nurses for more than 55 nhs trusts in england, all staging a two day strike in all staging a two day strike in a dispute over pay and patient safety. the action by members of the royal college nursing is expected to lead to thousands of operations and appointments being cancelled. the health sector steve barclay says he wants to work with unions to a fair resolution, but warned unaffordable pay rises stoke inflation . 106 migrants arrived inflation. 106 migrants arrived inflation. 106 migrants arrived in the uk yesterday in the first small boats to cross the english channelin small boats to cross the english channel in more than a fortnight . bad weather has deterred any crossings since the 2nd of january. three small boats left french beaches on tuesday. two made it to the uk and were picked up by border force . third picked up by border force. third got into difficulty. acholi and 45 people were rescued by french officials . ukraine's interior is officials. ukraine's interior is amongst at least 60 people who've been in a helicopter crash . the national police chief crash. the national police chief says denis want to steer ski was killed in the crash near nursery in the town of bavaria outside ukraine's capital, kyiv. say at least 29 people were also hurt, including 15 children. cause is unknown and there's been immediate comment from russia . immediate comment from russia. you're up to date on tv, online and dab plus , this is tv news. and dab plus, this is tv news. we'll get back to bev in just a moment . by by good morning at 1037. this is bev turner today on gb news. now, regardless of whether you believe that the government's response to covid was overreach or didn't far , i'm sure that or didn't go far, i'm sure that we all agree lessons need we all agree that lessons need to learned for the next to be learned for the next pandemic . whenever pandemic. whenever the world health decide that health organisation decide that we event since spring we are in on event since spring 2020 were unprecedented and raised important questions about the individual versus the collective medical ethics, the impartiality of regulatory health bodies. and so on and so on. so to help us reflect on these huge issues , i'm delighted these huge issues, i'm delighted to be joined by the consultant virologist and lecturer at cambridge university, dr. chris, and in the studio with me, american physician dr. lindley and pathologist dr. ryan cole. so let me come to you first. here in the uk, the pandemic preparedness , it was years in preparedness, it was years in the making was torn up without any explanation. was the same in america. and if when did it strike you that that might not have been the necessary of action going wrong ? oh, i, i was action going wrong? oh, i, i was surprised that around the world, the pandemic plans were all very similar. we had a pandemic plan. many years ago in the early 2000, and we didn't follow anything that was written there in around the world. and so it was shocking that in lockstep around the world, everybody followed that same pattern . and followed that same pattern. and we threw all logic, all medicine, as you mentioned, medical out the window. and we threw we had away and. it didn't make any sense. neither there nor here. so, chris, with the passage of time now, do you that was the right course of action to change what was already written down as all our response and for instance, quarantine doing the unwell as opposed to quarantine in a healthy . the quarantine in a healthy. the problem is that every challenge is a new one. and if we try to view the world as something that you have a set of guidelines that behave like tramlines and you relentlessly follow them without dynamic in your thinking , then you're also equally setting yourself up for a bruising . so you have to bruising. so you have to appraise every single situation on basis of how does it possibly fit with what we do know. but what are the important things? we don't know? and then be prepared to change your mind and the and people are the public and the people are being asked to comply with the various measures . also have various measures. also have to understand may understand that judgements may change , may change, change viewpoint, may change, and therefore rules, regulations and therefore rules, regulations and approaches change. and and approaches may change. and the one thing we mustn't do is be our thinking that this be too in our thinking that this the way we always do it, because that's way we've always done that's the way we've always done it. we have to do it. therefore, we have to do that again, because that's exactly mistakes made and exactly mistakes are made and we've keep open mind we've got to keep an open mind about to manage about the best way to manage these confront these things and confront everything facts everything based on the facts and the evidence and what we think is the best way forward, based from past, but based on evidence from past, but with to the future. okay. with a view to the future. okay. dr. lindley , i know what chris dr. lindley, i know what chris is saying that we need to be nimble and the government needs to make decisions on on the rush sometimes. but i didn't see any science relation to science in relation to a respiratory virus suggested that we rip the plan for a we needed to rip the plan for a respiratory virus. did you? that's exactly right. one thing that didn't make sense to me being physician on the ground was they to tell was they told us to tell patients to stay until they can breathe go to the breathe and then go to the hospital. that never made sense because our job is to actually because ourjob is to actually dive into problem and figure dive into the problem and figure how to with the things are how to deal with the things are happening and try to respond . happening and try to respond. and once they started , you have and once they started, you have to start wearing masks and things like that. you know, our cdc went from wearing pretty much a spacesuit to a 95 to surgical mask. and then when they ran out of everything, they started saying, you can wear a bandana and we all know that never made sense. okay ryan, what's your response to that? i think as was brought up , one has think as was brought up, one has to be nimble, but during these three years nobody was nimble. everybody was rigid. we didn't adapt to what was happening. the data came out very early . data came out very early. stanford and dr. ioannidis, that infection, fatality rate, case fatality was actually far lower. and akin to a flu. so there's construct of, well, we need to be nimble and adapt. well, why didn't and did we silence didn't we? and did we silence the voices that had the science? those of us have a background in immunology, virology, pathology. dr. feet on the street, dr. lindley feet on the street, seeing what was happening, we knew that this wasn't as bad as. it was painted to be, so we should have adapted bed nimble. and joke that all and i like to joke that all doctors scientists doctors and scientists agree when censor ones who when you censor the ones who don't. so not having that dialogue these dialogue led to all these draconian measures that were completely unnecessary . go on, completely unnecessary. go on, chris. was what your chris. what was what was your response well i agree. response to that? well i agree. i mean, my point was that we need to be nimble and. we need to not be rigidly approaching these things in a one size fits all way because you are really setting yourself up for fall if you do that. and that was necessarily in evidence. that was very much a me too, and a sheep mentality . this. we were sheep mentality. this. we were looking at what was happening in other countries and we also set up our own internal arguing that's here in the uk, didn't we, where we the devolved administrations having almost a competition to see could be kindest by introducing most draconian measures . this, this. draconian measures. this, this. it was the wrong way to do this. you don't look at a country and say, well, they're doing it, so we should you should look at a country and look at the outcomes and well, what's working? and say, well, what's working? what translate our what might translate to our population? fact population? respect the fact that countries are that all countries are different, a different different, they have a different demography. different different, they have a different demogconditions, differenterent living conditions, different geography, different ways of working. and so you don't just use a one size fits all, but you should be at what other people are doing and then saying, what might able adopt that might we be able to adopt that be here. my own be sensible here. my own view with pandemic that we with this pandemic that we tended to use a one size fits all across the entire population, it became pretty apparent, pretty quickly. who was most at risk ? it was elderly was most at risk? it was elderly people , people with pre—existing people, people with pre—existing health conditions . young people health conditions. young people were at very low risk. and one of our chief medical actually sort of tongue in said, look, you have a worse if you run into your school than if you run into covid in terms of your risk of something adverse that's happening. did you nevertheless think we can put everyone into a lockdown? and i don't think that was necessarily the right thing to do. but chris, if you don't mind me saying this, i don't remember hearing you say during many appearances that you made in the media during that time that. we needed to allow children and those without pre—existing medical conditions, i know. you might say i don't know. you might even say the under 52 to go about that job that the business normally did. you feel you couldn't say that during pandemic ? we that during pandemic? we certainly were much more vocal as time went on and we knew what the mortality rates and what the risks were. we were certainly a lot and i say we, the community that i work in, we were much more vocal about how we need to be things, opening be loosening things, opening things certain sectors things up for certain sectors of societyple who were saying, for instance, i'm vulnerable. i think everyone should stay locked up to protect me . i making the point that me. i was making the point that vulnerable people can identify me. i was making the point that vuln theye people can identify me. i was making the point that vulnthey are.ople can identify me. i was making the point that vuln they are. they've identify me. i was making the point that vuln they are. they've told |tify me. i was making the point that vuln they are. they've told who who they are. they've told who they are. they take steps to protect themselves and go the extra mile. for instance, using ppe and so on. if they feel that that will help them. but that doesn't mean it should be required the general required of the general population . i certainly did make population. i certainly did make those points, especially we knew more we knew lot more more once. we knew a lot more about disease and had about the disease and we had vaccines, sensible vaccines,

we will be after the war excuse me for not asking the question wake up in a country whose society was used to martial law the thesis cannot be criticized because the war and here is our society and has the ability to ask questions, maybe it will get used to not asking them i don't have something else like that what is society asking us, moreover, there is actually quite a lot of political criticism, including on certain decisions that do not suit a part of society or a part of the political community in that among the parliamentary politicians are not satisfied. we have just heard criticism regarding the decision of the constitutional court, we have heard the decision on the complete construction of the law, reform, decentralization, we have heard the decision on the law that criminalizes certain a-a relations between e-e chiefs and subordinates, more ethical commanders and subordinates in the execution of orders e- er, in case of non-fulfilment of the orders of the armed forces of ukraine, yes, and it’s all democratic, it’s very platforms on which you heard this discussion, which television, uh, well, on a single broadcast, including by the way, why i i heard it, including

after on the island. this is a tiny, tiny . so what this is a tiny, tiny. so what perhaps needs to change about how we interact with politics in society, about how society runs itself, about how we approach as as a thing really ? is this now as a thing really? is this now just an inevitable party that we're going to have to have these sort of in place ? or is these sort of in place? or is there something that can be done to make things better for how people interact with . politics people interact with. politics well, i think the real issue , well, i think the real issue, social media and the fact that social media and the fact that so many people can can post on media with impunity. i really believe in and people having a voice and in democracy. but on social people have said they want to bomb to cause me harm to poison me with ricin and i have this on trinity. i would call it i am a conservative, i'm a woman and my father my father is actually but i have a i have an engush actually but i have a i have an english and i'm a welsh mp . my english and i'm a welsh mp. my father is from monmouth and my grandfather was a miner. i think it's this on holy trinity o

the chief of police in ottawa was signed by going after family members,ot spouses, this has happened in other societies but none would call free societies next. card decline. hate speech before your hard work this is reality. this is actually happening with the rapid ease especially digital currency. earlier this year than or april joe biden had executive order on central bank establishment in the united states. which is again world economic is extremely brightness. it is a great way to control the public how they can useu money. you do not need gulags to impose tierney next to progress hybrid i think is fantastic. i was not big government it is a hybrid. we spent 40 years defending it from the front door capitalists of the country -- defending capitalism but not realize we were invaded the back door through fascism, basically chinese social credit system. this is where we are right now is a world in a country, next. environmental social governance. i won't spent a lot of time and this this essentially to be the end of capitalism. this is more devisee into the energy industry than any executive order. then anything by demonstration has

society. your looked after as a society. your views , very, very welcome to views, very, very welcome to politics. now the dame are always facing calls for addressing nation this morning after the prime minister asked his independent and brand new ethics investigate ethics adviser to investigate the conservative party chairman's affairs. the conservative party chairman's affairs . all of chairman's tax affairs. all of this obviously , as you will know this obviously, as you will know by now, that mr. zahawi paid a penalty to the office while penalty to the tax office while he chancellor bear in mind, he was chancellor bear in mind, he was chancellor bear in mind, he was chancellor bear in mind, he was their boss. really at the time. and a statement said he time. and a statement he said he was confident that he acted properly throughout all this. properly throughout all of this. and to mark lee and earlier we spoke to mark lee and was a former special and he was a former special adviser to mr. zahawi, and he worked him when was worked with him when he was education secretary having worked in a team, he was always very you he's very straight. as you said, he's very straight. as you said, he's very well in westminster. very well liked in westminster. he's very good at including people he's a very organised people and he's a very organised guy effective guy. guy as well, very effective guy. so i think we'll have to see what and i'd be i'd be what comes out and i'd be i'd be surprised if what out was surprised if what came out was much different to what we've heard already. think heard already. i think the sooner that inquiry can do sooner that this inquiry can do its thing and then the of its thing and then the rest of us it found, the us can hear what it found, the better, because were better, because as we were experiencing, every time a politician comes on the news, they rightly going to spark they are rightly going to spark you other people what's you guys and other people what's going sooner going on. so i think the sooner they it, the better. well they do it, the better. well joining us now is our political reporter, olivia utley. and he's right, the timing right, isn't he? the timing of this swift because this needs to be swift because there a risk at moment of there is a risk at the moment of a minister. he's already a prime minister. he's already under within election under pressure within election looming all the looming next year and all the challenges that been challenges that we've been talking distract it talking about being distract it and on something that and focusing on something that erodes faith erodes public faith in politicians. absolutely. and this pretty this is becoming pretty embarrassing rishi sunak. this is becoming pretty embline;sing rishi sunak. this is becoming pretty embline is1g rishi sunak. this is becoming pretty embline is from rishi sunak. this is becoming pretty embline is from the hi sunak. this is becoming pretty embline is from the primeak. the line is from the prime minister's team that the prime minister's team that the prime minister aware that minister was aware that there had been previous investigations into tax affairs into nadhim zahawi tax affairs when appointed party when he appointed him as party chairman , but he didn't know chairman, but he didn't know what was true and what wasn't true. and the cabinet office said that the issue was resolved and it was okay for the prime minister go ahead appoint minister to go ahead and appoint him. with that is that him. the issue with that is that if which bit was if you didn't know which bit was true which wasn't true, why true and which wasn't true, why didn't he probe a little bit further? and course, rishi further? and of course, rishi sunak promising sunak came into office promising to in public to restore standards in public life. so far we've him life. and so far we've had him reappointed and suella braverman after controversy. after the leak controversy. gavin controversy gavin williamson controversy too. dominic raab still under investigation for bullying and he's still there. and now we've got this on top of it. so it just feels like sort of scandal after scandal for the prime minister and what the real problem now for the teams, the hallways, is that there are plenty of backbenchers openly saying his saying that, you know, his position untenable and you've position is untenable and you've got ministers speaking got senior ministers speaking privately suggesting that now as as mark hain was saying that now , now that zahawi has become the story, he is not going to be possible for him to do his job because he's got to appear in the media and all the questions are just going to be him are just going to be about him and affairs. the and his tax affairs. the question, i suppose, is, are the government going to back him when as though they're when it seems as though they're backing him because could backing him because they could have him have just got rid of him yesterday is yesterday saying this is embarrassing, it's a distraction. have distraction. you might not have done anything deliberately wrong, not a good wrong, but it's just not a good look. so the look. yeah. so far the government backing they government is backing him. they might that he will might be hoping that he will resign because you know, resign himself because you know, he realises that he's becoming the story. this is becoming the story. but this is becoming a of pattern with rishi a bit of a pattern with rishi sunak although does sunak because although he does still majority that he still have this majority that he inherited boris johnson, it inherited from boris johnson, it feels he's politically feels as though he's politically quite the quite weak. he didn't have the support conservative support of the conservative party particularly, party membership, particularly, although support although he did have the support of by of employees. it wasn't by any means overwhelming support and he he's sort of got he knows that he's sort of got to keep his friends close and that's what he does. but that, of course, problems him, of course, is problems for him, too. ask you, do you too. and i just ask you, do you think it requires an ethics adviser to decide whether there was conflict of interest, that was a conflict of interest, that somebody chancellor and somebody who was chancellor and was negotiations was in personal negotiations with some kind of with hmrc had some kind of clash? does it take a third party to tell you that at taxpayers expense? well sort of officially there isn't any particular problem because hmrc is a non—ministerial department. that's the line coming from. so how we support is. so the fact that his tax affairs are being would be investigation while he was irrelevant. was chancellor is irrelevant. i know you that sounds know what you mean. that sounds a bit ludicrous. officially i see the purpose of it, but one might think that politically his position has become untenable . position has become untenable. and it's not really a question for an ethics adviser. it's more a question of in politics, is it possible to have someone like this who the biggest issue is that for most people in the country, avoiding millions of poundsin country, avoiding millions of pounds in tax is such an alien concept that it does make the conservatives look out of touch . so one could say that a prime minister with sort of more political nous would see that instant and quickly interesting . thanks very much indeed, olivia . 18 minutes past the olivia. 18 minutes past the houn olivia. 18 minutes past the hour. on this spring. you up to date with what else is happening news wise? almost twice a day. ambulance workers the ambulance workers in the northwest england will walk northwest of england will walk on today and then on going dispute pay and conditions dispute over pay and conditions following yesterday's walkout of staff in the west midlands. the government says it continue government says it will continue to in with the to engage in talks with the unions, but the union says that the government is belittling their efforts to save lives rather than discussing a pay offer . rather than discussing a pay offer. holidaymakers are being warned to stay alert when booking trips online with cost of living pressures, making people more vulnerable to scams . online safety experts are saying travellers should look out for fake deals on holiday websites . nominations for the websites. nominations for the 95th academy awards will be announced later today. the irish actor colin farrell and the engush actor colin farrell and the english actor bill nighy are both in the running to get their first best actor oscar nominations. farrell has already won a golden globe for his role in the banshees of inishowen . in the banshees of inishowen. while he has received acclaim for his performance in living . for his performance in living. now concerns are growing for a woman. her newborn baby and her partner. almost three weeks after they went missing . after they went missing. constance martin and mark gordon are the subject of an international missing persons investigation after a string of attempts to slip under the radar of authorities. they were last seen at east ham chepstow in newham on the 7th of january with a brand new newborn baby wrapped up inside constance coat. i'm our national reporter. ellie costello with the full story. missing woman constance martin may have given birth in the back of a car, which was later found burnt out in the greater manchester area. report suggests that the placenta had been found by fire crews . the been found by fire crews. the new mum is from an aristocratic family with links to the royals . she disappeared with her newborn baby and her partner, mark gordon died on january the fifth. the last official sighting of them was on january the seventh. so what do we know so far? well, on the 5th of january, the couple left their abandoned car on the m60 one near bolton at around 6:30 pm. the next day the pair travelled 30 miles by taxi at 330 in the morning on the 7th of january. they journeyed 267 miles south to the port of harwich. they were then spotted in the essex town of colchester at 9 am. the last officials sighting of the couple was at east ham tube station between 1030 and 1230. on the 7th of january, each time that miss martin and mr. gordon are spotted on cctv , they're are spotted on cctv, they're covering their faces or looking away and they have kept their baby covered up . investigators baby covered up. investigators say the couple appeared to know how to evade authorities , making how to evade authorities, making the search for them even harder. concerns are also growing as nehhen concerns are also growing as neither. constance nor the baby have seen. a doctor . the family have seen. a doctor. the family have seen. a doctor. the family have no luggage , as most of have no luggage, as most of their belongings were destroyed in the car fire. but constance is believed to have access to cash. her is believed to have access to cash . her father, napier martin, cash. her father, napier martin, made a direct appeal to his daughter through the independent newspaper darling constance . newspaper darling constance. even though we remained a stranger at the moment, i stand by, as i have always done and as the family has always done, to do whatever is necessary for your safe return to us. i beseech you to find a way to turn yourself and your wee one into the police as soon as possible . so you and he or she possible. so you and he or she can be protected only then can a process of healing and recovery begin however long it may take. however difficult it may be. little is known of mark gordon . little is known of mark gordon. he was born in birmingham but moved to the us with his family when he was 15. he was convicted of rape and spent the next 20 years in jail. of rape and spent the next 20 years in jail . he was recorded years in jail. he was recorded as deported from the us in 2010. constance and mark gordon appear to have gotten into a relationship in 2016 when she dropped out of drama school. she has been estranged from friends and family ever since . photos on and family ever since. photos on her facebook shared in 2020. captioned her loves frogs appears to suggest that she's had more than one child. in a statement , the met police say statement, the met police say this is a complex investigation with officers from across the met continuing to work around the clock to find constance , the clock to find constance, mark and their baby . there is mark and their baby. there is nothing to suggest that any of them have come to any sort of intense carnal harm. we just need to ensure they are okay, especially the baby, and do not require any medical assistance for any underlying issues. detectives are appealing for anyone with information. also suspected sightings of the to couple get in contact with the metropolitan police. ellie costello . gb news. with that, costello. gb news. with that, we'll take a break. and after that, we'll be talking about the troubles surrounding this year's brit awards . after a decision to brit awards. after a decision to use gender neutral categories has backfired because it's led to an all male shortlist for best artist . welcome back. as 827. still to come on the program today, after laura carney's father died, she discovered his bucket list as she began a journey to tick off the items honoured in honour of him. so she's not seen life through his eyes . we're going to through his eyes. we're going to speak to her live at a quarter to nine from the usa. speak to her live at a quarter to nine from the usa . and at to nine from the usa. and at 9:00, the legendary tabloid editor eve pollard will be here giving us her take on probation officer's failings and all the rest of the day's top stories, including her thoughts on ghislaine maxwell's controversial prison interview . controversial prison interview. that good to know. she's claudia winkleman, the mother . yes. so winkleman, the mother. yes. so you can join any of our discussions by emailing gbviews@gbnews.uk uk. and that is what you have be doing? yes. what have you got. lots on bucket list because this list is to meet the king of breakfast television. eamonn holmes star. that's from damien . so we'll try that's from damien. so we'll try that building . glasgow. i only that building. glasgow. i only have one left and that's to go and visit auschwitz. and i'll be achieving my 80th birthday in the middle of february. i'll she couldn't do no thank. i would be be upset lots of books be so upset read lots of books about think i'd go to about i think i'd like to go to that but i don't think i'm on my bucket list. so i went to the holocaust i think holocaust museum and i think it's tel aviv, jerusalem was wasn't but it was a very emotional experience to anne frank's house. and i'm been there. i was privileged enough to be there like i was there filming and i was there for fun . yes. i was able to be able to be we had, you know, free reign of the place. wow. to put it. wasn't expecting that. not a single piece of furniture inside the un frank museum. i actually think it would have been better if replica stuff there. if they had replica stuff there. i but the amount people i know, but the amount of people sitting yeah, but some of sitting in. yeah, but some of the people that have to go through doors as well. through the doors as well. why the still standing. the place is still standing. steve says on probation. i'm so sick of politicians being like when happens when something like this happens and lessons have been and they say lessons have been learnt when they never seem to be very, strict. just be very, very strict. just really quickly homework, not really quickly on homework, not a person agrees with me. a single person agrees with me. everyone homework . there everyone hates homework. there we that's why we've got we go. that's why we've got problem with education. no, problem with education. no, no, homework is not problem homework is not the problem situation . there's only situation. there's only a limited number of hours. the kids are at school. it will make the school not going to get teachers that. they're teachers to do that. they're already strike also just already on strike and also just i pressures on family i mean, the pressures on family life, know everybody's life, i just know everybody's miserable. right? life, i just know everybody's miserable. right ? okay. miserable. so good, right? okay. let's have a sting and then we're back talking showbiz. nine, the brit awards. what hoo ha. they have got themselves involved and it's all gone. pete tong really, really down with the lingo. yeah they're reviewing a decision that was already controversial in itself to make categories, gender neutral. this was a move that was very much pushed for by artists like sam smith identifies as non—binary and will who is openly gay will young, who is openly gay and it resulted in a really bad result for artists. not result for female artists. not a single one was nominated. it was an line—up is that an all male. line—up is that progress? be careful what you wish for. here to tell us more, showbiz reporter stephanie takyi on this one. stephanie, how. well, you know, the brit awards say didn't wasn't expecting such a big backlash when they said that they were scrapping their on their gendered categories . on their gendered categories. back. on their gendered categories. back . in 2021 to 2021. and back. in 2021 to 2021. and what's happened since is that the ratings have been on the wall since that decision. now, they have their most prestigious prize , which is the artist of prize, which is the artist of the and there's no females the year. and there's no females that nominated . so that have been nominated. so you've the likes of harry you've got the likes of harry styles george, and still styles, george, ezra, and still it may just stop you right there. my heart's breaking first. really? i hope it is. well, it's not. not in the slightest. say, be careful slightest. i say, be careful what you wish for, because if it was an all female line—up, we wouldn't here . no, we wouldn't be sitting here. no, we haven't. so you would be haven't. you so you would be called up on your station in this new england calling for the cake. it was two men that were calling for it. and then those two have resulted no two men have resulted in no women getting nominated. so are we in favour? end the we in favour? the end of the will and the what's will young award and the what's his name? sam smith award. let's give them their own awards. so now what should be is now maybe what it should be is that point of sam that the whole point of sam smith trying to smith, what he was trying to campaign was that campaign for, was that these awards reflective of the awards were reflective of the societyhe society we live in or the music industry. you know how it would have been if we just kept the categories which said best female artist, male . that's female artist, best male. that's what they should have done. they should have kept those categories. but what's happened now? their beds and now? they've made their beds and now? they've made their beds and now have to lie it now they have to lie in it because there's no way that they're get of this they're going to get rid of this category. the artists of they're going to get rid of this cateyear, the artists of they're going to get rid of this cateyear, because artists of they're going to get rid of this cateyear, because sam;ts of they're going to get rid of this cateyear, because sam smith says the year, because sam smith says so. because this year so. yeah, because this year definitely there's going to. is it true is it fair to say, though, that there aren't any decent female artists that could have qualified? is it is it genuinel

society of our society. it's great unequivocally, confirming having secured coming by voting in favor of such a decision. uh, thank god thank god okay. we are in our twentieth year, after all, it was marked by a pandemic, yes, first of all, the pandemic ended, but in the twenty- second year, the losses did not end. no , of course, this year the british buried their queen, the russians buried their heroes. dasha dugin was killed for a position. i wouldn’t want to compare, which one is more painful, but it was hard to find out that three heroes of our program died, a young journalist alexei lyashevich from donetsk, one of our experts, nikolai shchekin, died. and of course, vladimir makei and what was the most irreparable loss of the year for you? for all the guys here. except for those who, let's say, spit on their past, spit in the graves of their grandfathers. here, and so on for all the guys and russians and ukrainians who are dying in this fratricidal conflict. just from my point of view, ukrainians do not know what they are doing. but the russians are forced to be forced to be provided. uh, security, including ours, and this, of course, was forced a solution for vladimir putin and everyone who is now trying to accuse moscow of some kind of aggression. e. just like in 2014, when they tried to accuse donetsk lugansk and russia, respectively, of supporting these, uh, the formation of all-paratism, they forget that in the fourteenth year there was maidan the violent overthrow of power, the murder of law enforcement officers , arson, uh, means violation of the constitution with active the support of a western state, and in 2021 and early 2022 they simply spat several times in response to the proposal of the leadership russia to discuss security guarantees, in which there was nothing infringing on the interests of, say, the north atlantic alliance that was proposed. remove weapons from our borders. keep your 1989 promises. after all, our leadership is irresponsible. by the way, it’s also the amount that mikhail sergeyevich gorbachev once took out into the open field this year, soldiers of the western group of forces of germany and officers, yes, and betrayed, uh, hundreds of thousands millions of communists, but in all states of eastern central europe and in his memoirs. uh, so markus, the head of the east german intelligence of the stasi , recalls that they approached gorbachev, the leaders of west germany say so . well, somehow we may need to give some guarantees by this, we don’t need to deal with them, as it is considered necessary. uh, so the fact is that this is all a consequence of these processes and the russian leadership, realizing, as i said at the beginning of the program, offered a mortal threat several times. let's discuss no, then we reserve our right to military response, and that's what they wanted. because they clearly understood that this was both a second afghanistan and an opportunity to reformat the energy market , an opportunity to make money and make money. and for a decade. therefore, i will insult all those killed in this war, in fact, i do not single out anyone. although i repeat. here are the three people you named. so i still didn’t know alexei deprive. i know that he actually died a hero. uh, but uh, nikolay eshchekina, vladimir vladimirovich makiya. i knew personally. here in the phone is still stored, let's say he got sick with sms shchekino. as far as i know, i was still very sick in the summer. but uh, you see, you always regret something with a fact. so he wanted to discuss something, offered to meet for lunch. i'm in my hustle, then postpone. so he fell ill, and we didn’t see him again, as for minister e, in many respects for me he was a model of a belarusian diplomat and a model of serving the fatherland. let them reproach for anything there, dunnos of various kinds, here, or provocateurs are all lies. i know how it worked, makei and more than that, hmm. it so happened that about a month before his death, we met and discussed. the possibility of this means the activation of our foreign policy on the far frontiers of southeast asia. i know quite clearly that the minister has always fulfilled the tasks that the head of state faced him, if these tasks related to the need to ensure the diplomatic lifting of sanctions against our country, the minister worked in this direction, if the task concerned. uh, it means the turn to the east of the belarusian foreign policy, the minister worked in this direction. eh, makei e became. one of the locomotives is the signing of cards, uh, integration with the russian federation. and what is most important in 2020. that's when not a very simple foreign policy department , they work for austria, that is, they are me. with the objects of recruiting aspirations of foreigners of the special services, first of all, makei staggered this department. that, of course, is a politician. maybe he leaves when his time is up. that's probably together with the bright ideas of eastern european switzerland e, belarus as a donor of regional stability. this good idea, it's just, well, alas, in this wolf world they turned out to be unrealistic , and our minister left. well, there is someone to continue his work? okay, true. look here, to make life easier. we often reassure ourselves that justice will surely prevail, yes, and a boomerang. he will fly in and each of you will be given according to your deserts all that. sometimes, of course, the wait can stretch for a decade, but boomerang is for the western sanctions that have been remembered. yes, he turned out to be very fast already in the twenty-second europeans through the policies of their leaders. learn to wash once a week completely forgotten green economy and mass relaciruetsya in the us along with their businesses. this is just the beginning. here's the point of view. some kind of vengeance for ordinary europeans, for an ordinary european layman, i would not say that someone is in our patriotic circles. uh has similar feelings. they are hostages. as far as the political elite that leads the european union today, this is certainly a tragedy for the eu, this is civilizational suicide what's going on there because hmm let's just say one politician is more caricature than the other. so , uh, in this regard, i can only uh recall the words of uh, the french intellectual alain sarayal, when a macron appeared on the political stage, but was asked, who is the macron, mr. nobody says, just an employee of the bank of good ice. here, in this respect, of course, it would be much more interesting for me, but to hear the opinion of, uh, leaders. eh? let's say this financial family clan there or a relative, let's say, well, they don't act in press, here, and macron scholz and the same with them, well, i don’t even know how to characterize it, so that we just won’t be accused of someone. uh, the lack of diplomatic tact let's call it so it's controlled weak figures. here uh, but what is important here uh, for the decrepitude of biden , for this ridiculous fussiness of the macron behind the offended look of scholz. here we must not forget the liver view. well, here we can already state, yes, with all the nuances of this strange diplomat, who behaved very strangely for a man of his rank in germany into history. he will enter with this phrase. although it seems like people who know german well explained to me this is such a folklore expression. here but at the same time we must remember that, in spite of here. a caricature series of disguised public politicians always exists in the western world, which means shadow policy, shadow politics. that's where, uh, in general, otherwise he asks people. well, about whom we talked a little, and these are people of a different order, therefore, when some of our russian colleagues, especially at the initial stage, began to ridicule everything there uh-huh well, that's a funny foliage. there is this ridiculous macron. e yes, of course, this is so biden, who greets non-existent entities, his son an amazing person. actually. well, uh, but you have to understand that, anyway, the west maintains a high degree of efficiency, thanks to that. uh, to these financial political circles, which, let's say, are behind the us federal reserve system, here, uh, which e, in principle, these political figures are moving. eh, front. well, first of all, of course, they move them why because they are controlled managed, apparently today. here the idea is that it is necessary to subordinate europe to the interesting united states. well, and besides, what is happening. in general, it is important from the point of view. here is an assessment of economic processes, the robbery of the european middle class is taking place. he's getting poorer, fast. this, well, has always been the basis and pride of the european union and those of their adherents who convinced us here of our own, shall we say, darkness and the need to follow the fairway of installations so-called civilized peoples. here they are what small-medium business family businesses were talking about. uh, the market will regulate everything, look, the average business is going bankrupt. so, uh, a family business, in fact. uh, that's how the phenomenon in europe probably, if this continues, they will disappear during the pandemic was limited, artificial economic activity is introduced by price ceilings on goods that do not belong to them in such soviet years, democracy did not even think of. but democracy is a free market. if he is pavlovich you know really. i can’t even imagine a situation where the most famous country is the strongest country in europe. continent i'm talking about germany yes allows himself. and in this case, i do. it is not only that this country allows itself to endure such mocking terms in relation to its leader. true, there are still very vague ideas about the future of this country. and this, unfortunately, is a given. okay , 202. we chose a lot this year about our constitutional elections, we said shameful american ones, we don’t want to remember the french and english are also prime minister of great britain or once, but resign, in principle, and set a record for the shortest tenure. and sunuk was not elected at all, so england is now the most striking example of non-democratism, but there were elections that will set vectors not only in my opinion for their country or continent, but for the whole world, these are chinese elections. do you agree with such courts that the elections in the united kingdom and the united states will begin, paradoxically, but the fact is that the state, er, let's say, declares its right to judge. according to certain rules democracy other systems, uh are very specific hmm in terms of organizing the electoral process mechanism, very diplomatic, yes right. i know a few people who fully understand how the elections of the united states of america are organized. in the same way, we, of course, cannot say that the head of great britain is the prime minister, the majority of the population is chosen, the filters are arranged in such a way that no one who is outside the system to prevent power and maximize limit the people. from the point of view of cooperating in this process, it means that western political scientists themselves say that the democracy of complicity has long been replaced by the democracy of contemplation. uh -huh that's when people feel like they're uh choosing someone. because of them , a certain show is organized, but in fact this is not. uh, of course, someone can reproach us for somehow not being transparent enough in holding elections, but i will say, so , uh, this is the horizon he needs to strive for. here it is not necessary to idealize our reality, but at the same time i will ask one question. about judges who who judges in general and in this regard i will give one example, uh, the osce mission in the united states of america published, uh, dip, that the bc distracted on its website an entertaining something about the elections in the usa means they we didn’t go there, you know about these elections. you know why they didn't go there. e for a formal reason, because allegedly the osce member countries failed to send a sufficient number of candidates for the observer mission, so it was not formed. so in 2018 i participated in osce observer missions need urgent parliamentary elections. in armenia, believe me and i know that to armenia, to tajikistan, to mongolia, to belarus, anywhere. there are a lot of people who want to, but no one wanted to go to such a hole in america in quotation marks. they didn't send, uh, their representatives. well , it's just ridiculous, as far as china is concerned, uh, i'll be honest, but uh, no, universal criteria for democracy. i believe that the democratic nature of certain systems of government is determined by such a political term as legitimacy popular support today, it is obvious that the chinese society interests of the peoples inhabiting the people's republic of china and it is effective in terms of solving the problems of public administration of economic development, no one in the world will deny success. china is definitely in the economy in the development of technology in the fight against poverty, and can only recall where china was in 1989. so it might be, if not for the tough decisions made, yes, when here's some blood. it can be said that society and the state pay off a lot of blood, then the situation could be different, and here, too, there is an analogy in mind, defined with belarus in 2014 by the ukrainian leadership. i was a little bit immersed in these processes, saving personal capital. yes. here berkut stood for several more weeks. all this time they have already saved their capital and did not take measures to put pressure on the rebellion. as a result, the number of dead is no longer a thousand to hundreds of thousands to hundreds of thousands, in this regard, i w

society, or maybe in the ukrainian army , separately in society, there is some threshold of loss, after which it will already be clear that everything is either a foul of last hope, or we merge water. and how does excuse me fit into your favorite theory, zelensky zaluzhny, the americans put on a narrowed hostage for harvesting. yes, maybe the turnover of such a threshold, because people who are at home want peace to be established at home, but not just an abstract world peace on ukrainian terms peace on ukrainian terms was originally formulated as let's solve problems on the mainland? and crimea let's think later. well, about a month ago, biden said, you know, crimea is so needed so needed. and so, now the americans crimea is needed, respectively, they will now go under it, including weapons, and now it is completely peaceful in ukrainian conditions. ninety-first year according to the contract you continue. i mean ukrainian societyreach the crimea. we need the crimea, we are all with you. not just in the fog of a military war, we are in the fog of an information war. and we have tracked this now, when it is absolutely necessary. do not talk about your losses, but talk about the enemy's heavy losses. now tracked the enemy is losing hard hard hard. i was reminded of this story to me. so when i went to the chernobyl zone, i just got into the period of fires. i'm sitting with my boss. e fire station everything around is blazing running her subordinate says. well, comrade chief, the fire is going according to plan. you know, here we are in a situation. yes, when everything is burning around and people are dying, and now you show solidarity, there is a gift of coal, uh, bang, bangmut and lived, in my opinion, under 70,000 people, 545 remained. of these, 15 days is to blame, which is incomprehensible. as in evacuate they ask to fully help no one can, that is, that's how people, how on people this wars how interesting.

of police in ottawa was talking about, going after family members, spouse is and this has happened other societies but none that we would call free societies next card declined. i love delete your hate speech before your card works. laugh. this is reality. this is this is actually happening you know with rapid ease and especially of this currency. earlier this year i think it was march or april, joe biden had executive order on a central bank, digital currency establishment in the united states, which is again programable money world economic forum is extremely behind this. it is a great way to control the public through how they can use money and it's you don't need gulags in order to impose tyranny. so this is a hybrid. vivek ramaswamy, who i think is fantastic. it is not big government. it's a hybrid. we spent 40 years defending it from the front door capital of the country. defending capitalism. but didn't realize we were in invaded to back door through fascism, through basically the chinese social credit system. this is where we are right now as a as a world and a country. esg, environmental, social governance. i won't spend a lot of

after the i'm joined by dr. rikki neave he'll be rikki neave azhar and he'll be explaining we a society explaining whether we a societyway from the stoicism might majesty stoicism that i might majesty the queen held so dear and instead replacing it with new instead replacing it with a new aristocracy victimhood. join aristocracy of victimhood. join me . welcome back to . mark dolan welcome back to. mark dolan tonight with me. andrew doyle the queen's death this year was a momentous . authorjohanna a momentous. author johanna williams recently wrote a spiked magazine article where she argued that the queen's passing marks a cultural shift away from and towards victimhood and victimhood personified in the elite worldview of harry and meghan which she argues despise our . but this meghan which she argues despise our. but this is a fair assessment . are we really moving assessment. are we really moving away from a culture duty and stoicism towards new one of victimhood and identitarian ? now victimhood and identitarian? now joining me is social commentator dr. rikki neave azaan . thanks so dr. rikki neave azaan. thanks so

really went after a guess who was saying yes, defund the police which really hits minority communities hard. watch this. >> if you are a society that has such mass inequality, and you are a society you are a society that deprives people of resources they need to live. >> my point is, we also live in the here and now and if someone invades my home and has my wife held hostage in the bedroom tonight. >> sure. >> i don't give two [bleep]s where they came from tonight. but when you say we don't need police because of developmental failures, that doesn't solve the problems that are occurring tonight, tomorrow night, the next night. those things have to be dealt with. >> what do you say, doctor? >> well, there is no way that anybody should be talking about defunding the police. the police are heroes. heespecially here in new york city, with nurses and harder for the police. i'm not for that. any way, shape or form, hooray for the police. i'm not for this whole idea you brought up involuntarily committing mental health patients first of all the system doesn't work, liz. you pet them in the hospital. what do you think you're accomplishing? they go right back out on the street again, the

after bush increased government spending more than any of the six presidents proceeding him, which included, of course, democrats and the great society democrat, who did, at the time, increase government spending, lbj, great society all that stuff. what's different now is political. a democrat's in the white house, so republicans are complaining and threatening to crash the debt, refuse to raise the roof, the whole thing i told you. now, as if that wasn't enough, behold the president reagan said. >> congress consistently brings the government to the edge of default before facing its responsibility. this brinksmanship threatens the holders of government bonds and those who rely on social security and veteran benefits. interest rates would skyrocket, instability would occur in financial markets and the federal deficit would soar. >> we've been here before. i'm joined now by a former democratic senator from north dakota, byron dorgan, who has spoken out about the truth of finances, about regulating wall street. you have been right from time to time. we've pointed that out in past reports. thanks for joining me, senator. >> happy to. i hope it's more than time-to-time, but we'll see. >> well, it can't be every time.

society of editors had to of the society of editors had to resign that interview resign after that interview because he stood up for the press coverage saying wasn't press coverage saying it wasn't racist . that's a really racist. that's a really interesting point when you mention these mention the press and these people who pushing now to people who are pushing now to send to the press as a result of this. so that, again, seem to be a forward. again, back a step forward. again, i go back to this point criticise the press. only like, but this press. yeah. only like, but this is different thing. is a slightly different thing. i think always been this think there's always been this kind of undercurrent of anti press feeling this particularly against tabloids . i mean we against the tabloids. i mean we saw that really probably the high that was the high point of that was the leveson you we leveson inquiry and you know, we came very close to having a state backed press regulator in britain's a while there was a law on the statute that was going to strong arm newspapers into signing up to an official, you know, state regulator with a royal charter and all these kind of, you know, archaic things. and they would have been fined and they have know, and they have you know, companies would basically companies would have basically had to pay the losses of anyone who complained , things like who complained, things like that. it would have been a disaster press reason. we disaster for press reason. we very that. yes disaster for press reason. we veryi that. yes disaster for press reason. we veryi think that. yes disaster for press reason. we veryi think a that. yes disaster for press reason. we veryi think a lot that. yes disaster for press reason. we veryi think a lot of that. yes disaster for press reason. we veryi think a lot of people, yes and i think a lot of people, ironically, call ironically, would call themselves liberals , think that themselves liberals, think that it be the job of the it should be the job of the state to tell the press what it can and can't print. i mean, it's interesting with levison it because that axe, there was because with that axe, there was always rich always the possibility rich people to prevent people would be able to prevent the from criticising which the press from criticising which is dreadful there are is a dreadful but there are elements that seemed elements of that that seemed quite as if quite reasonable such as if press make a store print story thatis press make a store print story that is false that they would have then print the retraction in the same place on the front cover in the same site. that seems like a reasonable thing. that's reasonable. seems like a reasonable thing. thatyou reasonable. seems like a reasonable thing. thatyou know, reasonable. seems like a reasonable thing. thatyou know, obviously,|ble. seems like a reasonable thing. thatyou know, obviously, there and you know, obviously, there were elements were were other elements that were the phone hacking scandal, which was people were was a crime, and people were taking law arrested for it. taking the law arrested for it. so that didn't necessarily call for government for more government intervention. but i think intervention. yes, but i think there is this of long there is this kind of long running prejudice about the tabloids in particular, their readers? yeah. there's this idea that, you know , a lot of the that, you know, a lot of the kind of mp and stuff we're talking about the clarkson's column coming in a context of an epidemic violence women epidemic of violence women and girls sadiq khan said girls right sadiq khan said words have consequences is about this column the implication to be that you know your average sun is just one jeremy clarkson away a column away from, you know, assaulting a woman. where's because where's that come from? because it's not true. it not it's simply not true. it is not the that jeremy carson's the case that jeremy carson's column will have resulted in rise of violence. i mean, they made the same case when johnson made the same case when johnson made the same case when johnson made the joke about muslim women wearing burka and letterboxes. they hate crimes they said that the hate crimes escalated march. or i come escalated this march. or i come into 300% and those into this about 300% and those because completely because were completely debunked when actually analysed when they were actually analysed . true that these kind . it's not true that these kind of outrageous ever lead of outrageous comments ever lead to . no, not true. to violence. no, it's not true. it's it's just, you know, it's all it's just, you know, it's it's prejudice . it's it's just it's prejudice. it's just it's saying that, you know, there people out there, there are 60 people out there, people read the tabloids. people that read the tabloids. they're see. they they're monkey see. do they hean they're monkey see. do they hear, you know , or you hear this hear, you know, or you hear this phrase, it's dog whistle all phrase, it's a dog whistle all the around racism or the time around racism or misogyny. you know , who are the misogyny. you know, who are the dogs? yes, right. they're talking about the great british public. it does strike me as public. but it does strike me as odd he apologise. and odd that he apologise. and i think does have a chilling think it does have a chilling effect people, other effect on other people, other people to write people who are going to write a certain does it affect certain way. and does it affect you some columnists are you know, some columnists are quite specific and quite robust . there's appeal to , you . and there's an appeal to, you know, if you think of people like coming like julie burchill coming olalia of it's to olalia these kind of it's fun to read that kind of personality, but what happen to those but what will happen to those sorts things? absolutely. sorts of things? absolutely. i think it will have a chilling effect. you know, the having the threat or threat of intervention or regular . threat of intervention or regular. yeah. is you know that's something weighs very heavily on editors minds and it's a good reminder that the press you know, obviously the press you know, obviously the press does some brilliant work in exposing corruption and, you know, exposing wrongdoing and things like that. and that's all very important. but there's also another the press which another side to the press which just fun things you just making fun of things you throwing excrement at celebrities, they just everyone's and yeah. and you know that part of it you do want to have a spot you know. scarborough and sparky commentariat and a live leak kind of about all kinds of issues. you know, it doesn't all have to be high minded and sometimes boring. and what about this idea hate? i mean, you mentioned chris packham talking about hate crime, about how this is a hate crime, but as human beings but why as human beings shouldn't we be allowed to hate ? well, should be allowed to ? well, we should be allowed to hate to hate and we be allowed to express our hatred for and things we fit. i think what's things as we fit. i think what's happened with this cox and column is because it's about meghan markle and it's there's a kind of trend where anyone criticises meghan markle . criticises meghan markle. they're instantly derided as either racist or misogynist. yes. you know, that is yes. and you know, that is a kind of unacceptable form of hate that i don't think newspapers would want to print anyway, even if it, you know, they should be allowed to. but i don't think to. wouldn't they should be allowed to. but i d0|commercial to. wouldn't they should be allowed to. but i d0|commercialifto. wouldn't they should be allowed to. but i d0|commercial if i». wouldn't they should be allowed to. but i d0|commercial if i would uldn't they should be allowed to. but i d0|commercial if i would be.1't be commercial if i would be. yeah, we live in a societyd people don't like kind thing. so there's kind of thing. so there's a forever kind of expansion of what to the meaning of what it means to the meaning of hate or hate. so as soon hate speech or hate. so as soon as you say, oh, let's ban hate speech, quickly, some quite speech, then quickly, some quite innocuous end up getting caught up. no one knows up. well, because no one knows what they? no one what it means, do they? no one really what means. really knows what hate means. even the i think it's the even even the i think it's the european convention on human rights tried to define hate rights have tried to define hate speech the best they can speech and the best they can come with speech that is come up with a speech that is hateful. yeah. so it's completely, it's completely, totally it's completely in the eye of the beholder. completely beholder. it's completely subject if it's just a kind subject. if so, it's just a kind recipe for endless censorship . recipe for endless censorshi

society of editors had to of the society of editors had to resign that interview resign after that interview because he stood up for the press coverage saying wasn't press coverage saying it wasn't racist . that's a really racist. that's a really interesting point when you mention these mention the press and these people who pushing now to people who are pushing now to send to the press as a result of this. so that, again, seem to be a forward. again, back a step forward. again, i go back to this point criticise the press. only like, but this press. yeah. only like, but this is different thing. is a slightly different thing. i think always been this think there's always been this kind of undercurrent of anti press feeling this particularly against tabloids . i mean we against the tabloids. i mean we saw that really probably the high that was the high point of that was the leveson you we leveson inquiry and you know, we came very close to having a state backed press regulator in britain's a while there was a law on the statute that was going to strong arm newspapers into signing up to an official, you know, state regulator with a royal charter and all these kind of, you know, archaic things. and they would have been fined and they have know, and they have you know, companies would basically companies would have basically had to pay the losses of anyone who complained , things like who complained, things like that. it would have been a disaster press reason. we disaster for press reason. we very escaped very narrowly escaped that. yes and think of people, and i think a lot of people, ironically, call ironically, would call themselves liberals , think that themselves liberals, think that it the job of the it should be the job of the state to tell the press what it can and can't print. i mean, it's interesting with levison it because that axe, there was because with that axe, there was always possibility always the possibility rich people to prevent people would be able to prevent the from criticising which the press from criticising which is dreadful are is a dreadful but there are elements of that seemed elements of that that seemed quite as if quite reasonable such as if press make a store print story thatis press make a store print story that is false that they would have then print the retraction in the same place on the front cover in the same site. that seems like a reasonable thing. that's reasonable. seems like a reasonable thing. thatyou reasonable. seems like a reasonable thing. thatyou know, reasonable. seems like a reasonable thing. thatyou know, obviously,|ble. seems like a reasonable thing. thatyou know, obviously, there and you know, obviously, there were elements were were other elements that were the phone hacking scandal, which was people were was a crime, and people were taking law arrested for it. taking the law arrested for it. so that didn't necessarily call for government for more government intervention. i think intervention. yes, but i think there is this kind of long running prejudice about the tabloids in particular, their readers? yeah. there's this idea that, you know , a lot of the that, you know, a lot of the kind of mp and stuff we're talking about the clarkson's column coming in a context of an epidemic violence and epidemic of violence women and girls sadiq khan said girls right sadiq khan said words have consequences is about this column the implication to be that you know your average sun is just one jeremy clarkson away a column away from, you know, assaulting a woman. where's because where's that come from? because it's not true. it not it's simply not true. it is not the that jeremy carson's the case that jeremy carson's column will have resulted in rise of violence. i mean, they made the same case when johnson made the same case when johnson made the same case when johnson made the joke about muslim women wearing burka and letterboxes. they hate crimes they said that the hate crimes escalated march. or i come escalated this march. or i come into 300% and those into this about 300% and those because completely because were completely debunked when actually analysed when they were actually analysed . true that these kind . it's not true that these kind of outrageous ever lead of outrageous comments ever lead to . no, not true. to violence. no, it's not true. it's it's just, you know, it's all it's just, you know, it's it's prejudice . it's it's just it's prejudice. it's just it's saying that, you know, there people out there, there are 60 people out there, people read the tabloids. people that read the tabloids. they're see. they they're monkey see. do they hean they're monkey see. do they hear, you know , or you hear this hear, you know, or you hear this phrase, it's dog whistle all phrase, it's a dog whistle all the around racism or the time around racism or misogyny. you know , who are the misogyny. you know, who are the dogs? yes, right. they're talking about the great british public. it does strike me as public. but it does strike me as odd he apologise. and odd that he apologise. and i think does have a chilling think it does have a chilling effect people, other effect on other people, other people to write people who are going to write a certain does it affect certain way. and does it affect you some columnists are you know, some columnists are quite specific and quite robust . there's appeal to , you . and there's an appeal to, you know, if you think of people like coming like julie burchill coming olalia of it's to olalia these kind of it's fun to read that kind of personality, but what happen to those but what will happen to those sorts things? absolutely. sorts of things? absolutely. i think it will have a chilling effect. you know, the having the threat or threat of intervention or regular . threat of intervention or regular. yeah. is you know that's something weighs very heavily on editors minds and it's a good reminder that the press you know, obviously the press you know, obviously the press does some brilliant work in exposing corruption and, you know, exposing wrongdoing and things like that. and that's all very important. but there's also another the press which another side to the press which just fun things you just making fun of things you throwing excrement at celebrities, they just everyone's and yeah. and you know that part of it you do want to have a spot you know. scarborough and sparky commentariat and a live leak kind of about all kinds of issues. you know, it doesn't all have to be high minded and sometimes boring. and what about this idea hate? i mean, you mentioned chris packham talking about hate crime, about how this is a hate crime, but as human beings but why as human beings shouldn't we be allowed to hate ? well, should be allowed to ? well, we should be allowed to hate to hate and we be allowed to express our hatred for and things we fit. i think what's things as we fit. i think what's happened with this cox and column is because it's about meghan markle and it's there's a kind of trend where anyone criticises meghan markle . criticises meghan markle. they're instantly derided as either racist or misogynist. yes. you know, that is yes. and you know, that is a kind of unacceptable form of hate that i don't think newspapers would want to print anyway, even if it, you know, they should be allowed to. but i don't think to. wouldn't they should be allowed to. but i d0|commercial to. wouldn't they should be allowed to. but i d0|commercialifto. wouldn't they should be allowed to. but i d0|commercial if i». wouldn't they should be allowed to. but i d0|commercial if i would uldn't they should be allowed to. but i d0|commercial if i would be.1't be commercial if i would be. yeah, we live in a societyd people don't like kind thing. so there's kind of thing. so there's a forever kind of expansion of what to the meaning of what it means to the meaning of hate or hate. so as soon hate speech or hate. so as soon as you say, oh, let's ban hate speech, quickly, some quite speech, then quickly, some quite innocuous end up getting caught up. no one knows up. well, because no one knows what they? no one what it means, do they? no one really what means. really knows what hate means. even the i think it's the even even the i think it's the european convention on human rights tried to define hate rights have tried to define hate speech the best they can speech and the best they can come with speech that is come up with a speech that is hateful. yeah. so it's completely, it's completely, totally it's completely in the eye of the beholder. completely beholder. it's completely subject if it's just a kind subject. if so, it's just a kind recipe for endless censorship . recipe for endless censorshi

after all they did not have these children. they take these children and try to bring them up in new traditions, and thus the degradation of society is happening, the destruction of societys is. just in one let's destroy everyone. and we will stay, and then we will start all over again, that is, with such statements. we have always seen e in all the revolutions that were not carried out, but this always led to the misfortunes of mankind and to those warriors whom they were preparing. now they again they would start talking about belligerent rhetoric to mention nuclear weapons. well, we already discussed yesterday there they are talking about crimea, because they understand that this one on the polar world, which he arranged, began to collapse. they thought that if a society is amicized, broken down into separate elements into 57 signs into small states, which, when a large one unites, it will be easier to manage, but it turned out that humanity is a creature in this world. it cannot exist separately from another person, it reaches out to a person. and so these small communities began to organize their communities called them shos, breeze and so on, and thus challenged th

society, one of the first anti-slavery societies in the western world. he was governor, as i mentioned, when new york passed its gradual emancipate in law in 1799, freeing children born to enslaved mothers. after july 4th, 1799. but those children were required to serve their mother's masters well into. so that of his anti-slavery resume. but one thing that people often leave off it is where john jay wound up on slavery. so he from public life after, a quarter of a century of nonstop public service lived until 1829. and he mostly stayed out of partizan politics or politics with a capital p. but his son, peter augustus, jay, was a determined foe of the admission of missouri as a slave to state. that, in other words, for many of you remember the missouri, missouri crisis and the missouri. so while peter augustus jay was organizing a rally in new york city against the admission of missouri wrote a letter. and in those days people understood that letters on certain subjects were going to be released to the public. so this is not some sort of leak or something that wasn't to get out. and here's that. and in that letter, the agent founding father quoted both the constitution and, the declaration of independence, to make case that the founders would have supported and did not they did not encourage or the extension of slavery westward and would have supported. and it was constitutionally illegitimate to prevent the admission of missouri as a slave state. and he quoted jefferson's famous preamble, all men are created equal part of his case that absolutely had a right and a responsibility to prevent the admission of missouri as a slave state. so that is in marked contrast to an aging thomas who panicked at the crisis over the mission of missouri because. he likened it to a fire by fire bell that went off in the night and, castigated the radical sons of the of the founding fathers for threatening the integrity of the nation. so john jay wound up in a very place than his colleague thomas late in his life, as already suggested, john jay was a slave holder through of his adult life and is the scion of an elite new york family. this did not make the j. family remarkable. all the dutch initiated slavery, as this illustration suggests, and the english ramp it up and slavery was part and parcel the economy, new york's economy started to thrive in the early 18th century because it provisioned the west indian sugar colonies and enslaved people were working from africa and still more imported via the west indies and all the elite families and many not so elite in new york owned slaves. so it doesn't set him apart, but it makes it an essential part of his family story and his family tree. so tonight, i want to emphasize that this talk is not exclusively or even primarily about john jay, nor is the book. it's a multigenerational biography that features his sons, peter jay and william jay and his grandson john jay the second as much or than it features john jay and the goal was to study the transmission and the transformation values, particularly values around the of slavery and race and across time because much was passed on from one generation to another in the jay family. but as you'll see, the jay's transformed this sort moderate anti-slavery legacy into much more combustible, much more dangerous, much more threatening to the survival of all of the nation because there is no cause more likely to render part the nation that the jay family is is synonymous than the issue of slavery. so when the sons and grandson embrace radical, they are embracing the cause that will undo the nation is what that is founded and is what makes these people famous like the jay name is famous because of the founding, yet they're willing to risk it all. and so in that sense, it's also a study of an interrogation how we use words that we think we know what they mean, but maybe they mean different things when we put them in historical context. and those words are radical concern of and patriot words that you can find in any newspaper on any day in america, amidst our political and tussles and verbal wrestling matches. and i wanted to interrogate those concepts through the js and we could learn something about plasticity of the meaning of these important words. if we look at history rather than if we just look at cnn or the new york times amidst the tug and pull of our politics. and i'm really grateful for that i've had a chance to come to upstate new. i was at colgate university the last couple of days and i'm here now. and so i it gave a chance to revisit my research and something that is in the book is not a major theme, which is the relationship between upstate new york and the downs. js they are creatures of manhattan in westchester county, but as i thought about coming to upstate new york, i thought the upstate new york place is an absolutely role every step of the way in antislavery story that i'm telling to sharing with you tonight and that i share in the book, because it could being an abolitionist in westchester, in manhattan, in this era could make you a pretty lonely person. it made a particularly elite family. this this is not the common path of most elite families in certainly in southern york in the and then the precincts where the js inhabited. and so i realized, well, without upstate new york, in some ways the anti there js anti-slavery world doesn't make any sense so i'm going to really feature this part of the country so let's let's let's do it so this map is useful for again situate us so the js are from down here but this world up here where are standing today is really essential and. it's worth noting that from what you heard from me right now, you think, well, john jay, is he even an abolitionist? is all this is is even really against slavery? well, it's i mean, he's definitely moderate and a self-serving one at that in that gradual emancipation formula really displaces the cost of abolition on to the that's nominally receiving its freedom birth but at from another lens john jay actually did pay a political even for his moderate so believe it or not being the chief justice of the us supreme court of the united. had a lot not to recommend it back in those days they had to ride. there was no supreme court building or place where supreme court sat for months at a time and an army of clerks, let alone district courts and, circuit courts to handle things. they were sent on circuit. and john jay decided, you know what, i think i'd rather be governor of new york and the js who are federalist really did not like the sort of populist long time governor george clinton. and they thought the federals thought they well. js going to be our guy to finally unseat clinton but jay had a bit of a problem is that some people thought anti-slavery because in in the hudson valley and in staten island and parts long island there's a lot of slave holders who owned one or two enslaved people and you know, sometimes 25, 30% of households own, at least one slave. and so the word got out you know this j he might take your slaves away and one of his operatives wrote him a letter and sort of alerted him to this and rather than trying. sales in john jay his response he referred he celebrate the new york manumission society which was no longer a member of because he resigned when he joined the us supreme court and he was proud of their reputation for protecting black new yorkers from what he referred to as men who spirited people out of the state into, you know, into southern slavery. and he lauded the manumission for its african free school, which educated black children and here i'm quoting jay, who will now become members of society. and in this letter he said, in my opinion every man of every color and description has a natural right to freedom. so we didn't trim sales. he did plan his flag on the larger principle. and that may be why lost the election. it was a razor thin margin. it sort of hinged on some you know, you can't you know some things never change and some contested ballots in the steel county that william cooper father of james benham where cooper you know had marshaled a lot of support, but there were questions about that. but if you look at vote tallies from various counties jay lost a

society is a monk of another person. in general, society despised. well, she actually became a guy, yes, they stopped accepting her after she opened it. yes, this novel. eh, with fronsky they looked at her and whispered, that is, she actually turned into such a persona non grata, but turned into her voluntary, that is, she was warned. i correctly understand that it will be so even her husband warned him of the idea of ​​these in this situation. the princess of distress, tverskaya tells her the same thing, although betty herself is softly there speaking, good, but in principle, she lives in the world. she grandexe follows the rules of adilter. yes, what are they called of the soviet rule of the soviet dura, but anna is not. do you think we now have an alder consequence rule. we can spend such a parallel to modern life. isn't everything the same, but imagine your own , let's say, well-known media companies, if we are talking about the light of that time, these are media faces, are you married to a man to fix? and you have a child, you start to openly get caught by the paparazzi in the photo together, and with some young. ah. well, let, well , not a mulatto. yeah i don't know a young musician, yeah, anyone who's a young rapper a young rapper is fine. oh great. and your husband, my little one tells you, of course, i understand everything, but i have already seen the rural guardians several times. yes, he brings me to the gossip column. we all know. well , first of all, don't make her grown men laugh. i'm your husband. i provide you with a child, and then knees, as i understand it, i think this is about a child, it flashes several times in the book. yes, what will he do with him? thinks about bath. and of course, if anna's reputation is, of course, ruin, then this will affect the fate of the child trying. and there is such a proverb absolutely wonderful. i think in modern times it's the same, you can say, but karina says i'm talking about ladies. divorce at the very beginning when he thinks this is what will happen, he will leave her, then the next and then the next our circle will go, he cares and thinks, in general, the creation loves anna's husband. oh i think so. just imagine. yes what uh the husband of correction asks for the wife he provides for everyone and gives her the opportunity to hang out in the world and be just a beauty dress up dress up raise a child. he says i'll take you well to the child she brings up the governess's time. here is an earring, combed, washed, fed. she just tells him, hello seriously. choose outfits from paris yes, which cost a fortune. i ask you about one thing, so that she doesn’t laugh at me and at you in the world, so that it doesn’t get into the newspapers. it seems to me that anna's act indicates that she despised these rules of secular delter. and in general, this structure of society. yes, everyone really changes everyone meets in a hotel on the water. but this is by no means the case and i agree with this. husbands and families, but it should be her, despising this color to get into it to strive, and stop deceiving her husband for two. in my opinion , divorce him, as karenin suggests that she marry bronsky, who also proposes this to her. by the way, the ravens talk about what she does when she goes to the opera. we cannot return to the light. and by the way, and she has a great option. vronsky takes her to the dacha. rather, he didn’t write to a dacha in a village outside the city that, and not both of her men and her husband or lover. they say anna don't do it, please, right. this says and vronsky both offer her some options. how can this situation? and to be honest? let's deal with her. she doesn't. this is probably a manifestation of her character. do you think elina is a man when he is attracted to a woman. he thinks about that, intellectual is not important

after releasing a new protest song titled . what happened to which titled. what happened to which questioned some of the big changes that we're seeing in our society . many people call it societytness. howard says it's not an anti woke song , correctness. howard says it's not an anti woke song, but he just wants to have a conversation about what's happening to, our society, how it previously hits out against this culture . following the this culture. following the decision by halifax , the bank to decision by halifax, the bank to introduce pronouns on employees name badges . he described the name badges. he described the decision back then disgraceful, and said that halifax had got it wrong. his latest swipe at the utter madness sweeping the includes dancing is from the engush includes dancing is from the english national ballet and leo kearse the comedian and tv news presenter as , a six foot seven presenter as, a six foot seven transgender unconscious bias trainer. it's worth a watch but happened everybody scared of being attacked . what happened being attacked. what happened suddenly ? opinions are now facts suddenly? opinions are now facts . what's happening is scenes .wha

after releasing a new protest song titled . what happened to which titled. what happened to which questioned some of the big changes that we're seeing in our society . many people call it societytness. howard says it's not an anti woke song , correctness. howard says it's not an anti woke song, but he just wants to have a conversation about what's happening to, our society, how it previously hits out against this culture . following the this culture. following the decision by halifax , the bank to decision by halifax, the bank to introduce pronouns on employees name badges . he described the name badges. he described the decision back then disgraceful, and said that halifax had got it wrong. his latest swipe at the utter madness sweeping the includes dancing is from the engush includes dancing is from the english national ballet and leo kearse the comedian and tv news presenter as , a six foot seven presenter as, a six foot seven transgender unconscious bias trainer. it's worth a watch but happened everybody scared of being attacked . what happened being attacked. what happened suddenly ? opinions are now facts suddenly? opinions are now facts . what's happening is scenes .wha

after the meeting lukashenka had requests. on what terms come back so actively discussed in society, we do not need to create additional ones of some kind. points of tension in our societysdom, it should act in this way. we need not to close ourselves off from those who stood up and realized this, but to take a step towards no one idealizes these processes. they won’t meet you with a loaf at the border, but with handcuffs, too, probably, yes, this is really a difficult moral choice. i won't tell now. it's about walking under the lashes of pan - this is also, of course, exaggeration in any country can take root, but it's hard. once lost roots. you will understand. this manifests itself in everything from grocery shopping and health insurance to basic money making. it must be remembered that the same poles. yes, i do n’t care at all who the poles are british, argentineans, germans, swedes - these are people with a different mentality and you will never be fully accepted there by your children who have already studied at schools and so on, maybe you are not, the prices of your labor contracts. it's being told all it specialists will be cut in half the rent of an apartment,

they are found guilty of, then and they serve sentence after which they're rehabilitated in society generally, the process that we as a civilised societyes. that entire system is being actively disengaged . being actively disengaged. shamima begum so idea is to as a society do we, we forgive people, we generally do. depends how heinous crimes are , but we how heinous crimes are, but we do it through a formal process under the rule of law. and all complaints here that that's simply not being applied in case. thank you for the that you are the family's lawyer . do case. thank you for the that you are the family's lawyer. do you think that the media have demonised this young . well demonised this young. well i think that anyone who's joined a terrorist organisation has has a certain amount of negativity their way. the question the scope of that now in terms what's been the reporting on overall? i think it's evolved? i think when she left at 15, the british public and the reporting on this was generally quite sympathetic . how do you bring sympathetic. how do you bring a young schoolgirl back ? but since young schoolgirl back? but since we

they are found guilty of, then and they serve sentence after which they're rehabilitated in society generally, the process that we as a civilised societyes. that entire system is being actively disengaged . being actively disengaged. shamima begum so idea is to as a society do we, we forgive people, we generally do. depends how heinous crimes are , but we how heinous crimes are, but we do it through a formal process under the rule of law. and all complaints here that that's simply not being applied in case. thank you for the that you are the family's lawyer . do case. thank you for the that you are the family's lawyer. do you think that the media have demonised this young . well demonised this young. well i think that anyone who's joined a terrorist organisation has has a certain amount of negativity their way. the question the scope of that now in terms what's been the reporting on overall? i think it's evolved? i think when she left at 15, the british public and the reporting on this was generally quite sympathetic . how do you bring sympathetic. how do you bring a young schoolgirl back ? but since young schoolgirl back? but since we