. - [sonja] this is disgusting. - [kid] oh. - ew. (adults laughing) - [andrea] i thought my house was clean. i did not know. it could pick up something this huge. - did you make all this mess? (dog whining) - i can't even believe this was in my house. - i didn't have to do anything. - my home is super clean and i don't have to touch anything. - did you know, some self empty robots can actually let microscopic allergens and pollutants back into the air you breathe, as the debris transfers from the robot to the base? here's the proof. we used an ultra-fine powder that glows under black light to run this test. we filled the dust cup of this standard self empty robot with this powder to see what would happen when it transferred the material to its base. the robot approaches, docks and then as it begins transferring to the base, you can see that white cloud jet out. now this powder represents the dust, pollen, allergens, dust mite matter and even some common forms of household viruses that can be released into the air you breathe. - [mark

sonja, the podium is yours. >> good morning. it is a privilege for me to join today with our longtime partner and champion, representative castro, to discuss a important issue in our community. the continued and severe underrepresentation of latinos in the media. during his time in congress, representative castro and -- u.s. have worked together on a host of issues affecting our community, including education, economic empowerment and voting rights. yet, there is no question that our ability to advance policy changes that expands opportunity for latinos on any of these major issues is sorted -- thwarted by the perceptions our fellow americans have of the latino community. our recent polling research confirms two things. first, most americans know very little about latinos. not our contributions or our challenges. second, there is an empathy gap among americans when it comes to the hispanic community. while 20% of those surveyed view our community negatively, the majority are simply indifferent to us. in short, the real story of

same scenario replicated again and again because behind-the-scenes you have the three key architects, sonjaul and priyanka with an absolute massive stay over the political establishment. >> but the circumstances are different. 1996 and 2022, the congress was already a week organization, and they cannot afford to evict him in the same manner that they did because the other reason is he is from the oppressed community and they tried to push him very hard. if the signals go out, it's going to be detrimental for the congress, the congress would be over because already, the most oppressed ballots or with the bgp in many states. and there are 200 million in the year, and hopefully a number would crossover. looking at him. so if you try to do anything with him, drastic, i think it's going to backfire in congress. let me at this, he is a far more sophisticated person. he was in the 1960's when it was not so fashionable. he was trying to have the party of india that was about the region at that point of time. he was organization being center before he joined the congress. and you should know he is a

live is stanford associate professor of education anthony lysing antonio and stanford phd candidate sonja gable. thank you for joining us. >> thank you. kristen: these questions are for either one of you. harvard and unc are elite universities. one private, one public. both use race as one factor in making admissions decisions. what is the argument being presented today? >> the argument on behalf of the plaintiffs is that the use of race in any form in college admissions is unconstitutional. what they seek to do is reverse previous cases that said the use of race as one factor in admissions is constitutionally permissible. it is permissible because race contributes to building a diverse student body. there is a mountain of research on the benefits of a diverse student body on all students, particularly white students. kristen: this student has come up that the high court several times but never with a 6-3 conservative majority. based on the justice's questions today, how do they seem to feel? >> i will take a stab at that. they have clearly exhibited the political leanings that we expect