speech codes. in 2016, this year, for the first time ever, since the organization "fire" which stands four foundation for individual rights in education -- an organization headquartered philadelphia, a number of college campuses that have received that organization's most negative anti-free speech rating has dipped below 50%, to 49.3%. that marks for the present time eight years during which the number of colleges and universities that have been rate has continued to decrease. eight years ago that number stood at 75%. lest you worry, however, emory university remains part of the 49.3% receiving fire's mose negative campus free speech rating. now if you oppose those restrictions on free speech, before you feel too happy about the fact that the trend has been heading in a positive direction, you should keep in mind that there are other statistics that give rise to a reason for great concern. last october, an organization at yale, reported on the result of survey of college students which found that 5

it was a political speech. it had nothing to do with foreign policy. he made a political speech, it was a pathetic deal. >> joining us now. andy card, president of franklin pierce university, and former chief of staff for george w. bush. and the associate editer for the "washington post." >> so far in the speech that he is still giving in response to what hillary clinton had to say today. it was a political speech, it wasn't any good. that is after a 35-minute, hard-hitting speech against him. were you surprised that donald trump in his campaign didn't come up with any response to that speech at all? >> well, frvel, i think hillary clinton's speech was very political. i don't think it was a foreign policy speech. it was a speech they could have given. i agreed with a lot of the things that she said. she was criticizing donald trump, most of the time. it was not a policy speech from hillary clinton on what she would do. she didn't say how she would do things differently from barack obama. or differently than wha

how does he counter the speech? that was my question. >> in his remarks he's talked at length about libya and i think you'll see an increasing focus on libya in the days ahead. not only did her decisions in libya produce a humanitarian disaster but also she failed repeatedly to provide the security that was requested for our diplomatic personnel in libya and that failure resulted ultimately in the assault on the compound in which we lost our ambassador and it was a -- >> so, again, how does he counter that? you're not answering my question. you're talking about the failure which is you believe of hillary clinton, but how specifically does donald trump counter that? >> by drawing a contrast. hillary clinton's foreign policy which has emphasizes nation building whether it be in iraq or syria or libya is a sharp difference from donald trump's policy which he outlined in his speech which is to focus on common challenges with our allies like defeating islamic terrorism and not on trying to spread democracy at the point o

speeches. it was disciplined and we got a text, never before happened before, in a trump campaign. he had one effective line, her hash tag is i'm with her and he said i'm with you, the american people. >> do we have that sound? sound bite number three in the control room. can you play donald trump playing that? go ahead. >> she's believes she's entitled to the office. her campaign slogan is i'm with her. you know what my response is to that? i'm with you, the american people. >> so david gergen, that is framing this people versus the politicians change versus more of the same, the system is rigged, i'm not. >> he's going back to elizabeth warren, the system is rigged against you and trying to invite the sanders people over. he's doing things for his side of this argument he has helped himself i think. but you can't ignore the truth of what he says or the lack of truth of what he says. i do think in coming days we'll hear about a string of lies and exaggerations. let's go to something fundamenta

doesn't take away from the speech. what they now have to do, the clinton team is go out and really drill it down to your point, connect it to something real for the blue collar, suburban, moderate voters. i think she wants to do that. the question is, she still has a lot of baggage that was not addressed in her own foreign policy shortcomings. >> i was on the carter plane writing speeches when losing to reagan. we're still trying to win. carter said this is a decision between piece and war. he said do he really say that. the idea was to hold that. you hold your conclusive summation until the end. do you keep saying that for sick months that this guy is frightening? can you do that? >> i'm not sure they have made that calculation yet. they have known she's been on the defensive on these issues related to libya and iraq. they thought let's pivot. we're going to go on offense and turn this up. if you're the hillary clinton campaign are you really thinking about your october foreign policy speech central or saying i got to

speech. she has an opportunity to make a big speech here and really set the stakes of the election. i think she will make the contrast because the thing that will unify democrats in the end as john said several times in his interview with jake is that the fact that whatever gulf there is between sanders and clinton supporters so small compared to the kaz m between all of them and donald trump. i think she has to hit that hard. i think she's going to do it in a big way, part of her she'll make the big speech, but she'll distinguish herself from donald trump wlom she's called a loose cannon. and the olive branch to bernie sanders which she has to do because it's important thathe get those voters. she can turn what's a three-point race into an eight point race if she gets those sanders supporters at the beginning. >> she's starting out this speech tonight with his campaign video, especially, which is just being released tonight kind of targeting the obama coalition. >> and that is the key. david

speech codes? in the view of many, part of it, and perhaps a large measure, is the fault of the fact that children today are indoctrinated to this culture of political correctness, before they even arrive at college. that there is what's known as the bubble-wrap generation. of course, you bubble-wrap something because you don't want it to get hurt. and helicopter parents who fly in to protect their children from any possible offense that could arise. and that insulates children from the otherwise rough and tumble world of controversial ideas that exists out in real society. moreover, instead of colleges being run by faculty members as they had been many years ago now, we have the atmosphere where in fact most colleges are run by what's called the bureaucratic class, which happens to be administrators with less understanding and appreciation of the value of free speech. and, not surprisingly, lawyers perhaps are partially to blame. and i regret to say that today. there is what's known as the risk ma

trump's speech? >> i will actually be in the room with chairman yellen of the federal reserve board, and that will be a little bit more policy oriented than what mr. trump has to say. >> so you will be busy working in other words. mr. trump's speech is expected to be no holds barred. he profited from debt at the expense of working people. listen. >> hillary clinton is only right about one thing. i understand debt and had how to hand it. i made a fortune with debt. but debt for this country is a disaster and obama has piled it on and she has been there watching. >> mr. trump told abc he was simply using the loss on the book as any good businessman would. what's wrong with that. >> well, what's wrong with it is when he refuses to pay the small businesses that helped build his buildings. when he stiffs plumbers, when he stiffs painters, and then hides behind the fact that i'm rich, i've got a lot of lawyers, you can't sue me, you don't have a legal counsel. so i think that that's not the way most people

his speech, only 17 minutes long. that is by far the shortest speech i have ever heard him give.frequently goes on for an hour or more. so this was especially short. he also did not criticize hillary clinton once, and he acknowledged her victories. but here's the thing. listen to how the crowd responded when he did that. >> our fight is to transform this country and to understand -- and to understand that we are in this together. to understand that all of what we believe is what the majority of the american people believe. and to understand that the struggle continues. >> reporter: and actually what i thought was going to be tossing to there, christine, was bernie sanders congratulating in a very gracious way hillary clinton on her victories tonight. the crowd here responded with boos. you heard chants of "bernie or bust" during his speech tonight. there are a lot of folks here who are really his die-hard supporters, who are making it clear they are very much for bernie sanders. and you can see how it will be difficult just by the mood that we're seeing here tonight that they wou

speech preview. check, kind of. >> former contestant on season 3 of the apprentice. >> they totally own her and that will never, ever change. >> kind of. >> including if she became president, god help us. >> but he did use the teleprompter. >> i'm with you. >> trump 2.0. >> all right. likes it. >> that stuff is all going to encourage members of the establishment and others who want to bring the party together. marco rubio announced he's running for re-election this fall. he distanced himself from trump. he got a big of a tongue lashing and said he will go out of his way to express disagreements with trump as they come up and highlighted some of the past. so, john, simultaneously, trump rebranding his campaign, refocusing it but also trying to build the party. what's the score card for today? >> they don't understand how important brent is but the brent endorsement is the canary in the coal mine. he's not going to be the last. donald trump the question whether he clears the bar is huge as to whether h

i think he does in his bones, but if he continues to give a version of the speech as system speech andit, i think you will be stronger. -- he will be stronger. john: one of the things that was so good about hillary clinton's speech is you felt like it was the first time she gave it, and the first time out of the gate when she gave it a couple of weeks ago, it felt like she really owned it. she knew what she was doing. she believed it and owned it and knew what she wanted to say. and she said it in the best possible way. this trump still feels like feeling his way along -- i don't with you that he is sincere in his criticism, but he is reading a script. mark: we have seen three of the four pieces. we have seen clinton go after trump very convincingly on his consistency and we have seen trump go after clinton and we have seen trump talk about his foreign-policy. there's a lot of holes in it but we have seen him talk about how he would be different in some ways. what we have not seen as her go out there and make a robust case in the context of the campaign and say here is why i'm great on

you give speeches like this? i think this is certainly going to be one of the central components of their strategy. and one of the challenges that they will face that is there's just such a saturation when it comes to donald trump in terms of the exposure he has in the media, as well as just the endless supply of controversial statements that he's prone to make on any given day. they have to really identify where it's worthwhile to engage, where they feel like they can have traction. i think being able to contrast her record as secretary of state versus him not having articulated any coherent agenda when it comes to foreign policy, national security. that is an obvious path for them to go down. i think you're going to see them continue to escalate these attacks on his business record, on trump university, that's been a big theme of theirs. they want to really also get the point across that he is in their view a fraud, conning the american people, and shouldn't be entrusted with the highest office in the land. >>

. >> what is hate speech? >> if you apply hate speech, according to the things they say. the quran has hate speech. >> she group and under the quran. >> i was raised in a muslim family. my mother married me off at 22. by then, i was old enough and mature enough and i defoyed him. >> she ran away to holland and started to criticize her old religion. 9/11, i started to speak out. i saw on television young people celebrate the fact that 3000 americans were killed and the twin towers were brought down. this is it somebody who is known to express hateful attitude and bigoted remarks. there are people that could be incited violence. >> she is threatening violence. >> she called for the destruction of islam and she is clearly speak nothing a hateful way. >> i did not cause 9/11. it is not a li who kidnapped 276 girls in nigeria. >> billions of muslims in the world and they are not violent. >> you can't run away from the fact when it comes to violence committed in the name of religion, islam is number one. >> for sayi

let's start with this speech. how did you rate the hillary speech? >> i thought it was really strong and forceful. she hasn't been great at kind of soaring, rising above 30,000 foot level and in this case she did. she also took on a lot of attacks and a lot of sort of really kind of gut punches you didn't see a lot of republicans taking on until almost throughout the entire campaign. i mean she kind of went for the jugular off the bat. the daisy commercial right away. >> it was the 1964 campaign saying you don't have a choice choice in this campaign. one credible campaign running and this other guy is crazy, dangerous and incompetent. >> i think you saw the basic outlines of the next five months in this speech. >> yeah. >> you saw hillary, who's tone were modulated. >> very good. >> she's been practicing. it's not -- >> and presidential. >> people, perhaps, in an unfair sexist way, talk about screeching and so on and so forth. there was none of that. the idea -- >> there was an intellectual component to that. absolute confidence in what she was sayin

hillary clinton has a big speech coming up, a historic speech, the first one as the presumptive democratic presidential nominee and also donald trump has got a big big speech coming up outside of new york city, a speech that is going to help us better appreciate the controversy over the last few days over the remarks about a federal judge. in the meantime we have new information about what hillary clinton is about to say later tonight. let's go to jeff zeleny at clinton headquarters. what are you learning. >> reporter: i'm getting new information tonight about what is going to be in secretary clinton's speech. there will be three main points. first she will make clear this is a historic moment and put that moment in context of all the historical progress that has been made in this country, specific about how she will be the first woman to be the presidential nominee for a major party. she will talk about history but she will also talk about her vision and how it differs from donald trump. again, the themes we heard last week in that speech in san diego about how she believes donald trump i

hindering free speech.in your opinion, is there sort of a shift when a college student leaves college very much still like the 40s or 50s, do you think that millennial's are very much like, well whatever whatever, we are not put in bubbles, sometimes deal with things that are unpleasant. do you think you will see a shift in the kind of backlash, this idea that, well, maybe it is not so bad >> i think that -- my honest answer is it is too soon to predict what affects the current viewpoints will have. as your question itself correctly assumes, some people may go right into areas of business culture where free expression, again, is tightly regulated as a result of the type of work that they do, and so those people may never appreciate the rights they should have enjoying as aa result of not having been exposed to them earlier in life are going to the college experience. as a grizzled veteran it is easy to talk about how when i was in college at columbia in the early to mid- 1980s kamal there was regular studen

to that speech. they were live tweeting. they had trump delivering an instagram video almost as clinton was speaking here. very different from what we've seen from trump's campaign in the past. let me play you a little bit of that video. >> hillary clinton's only right about one thing, i understand debt and how to handle it. i've made a fortune with debt. but debt for this country is a disaster and obama has piled it on and she's been there watching. >> reporter: the heightened level of rapid response, jose, that's common in so many political campaigns is new just this week for trump's team coming after the ouster of former campaign manager corey lewandowski who was fired on monday. now the question for trump at this speech here today, are we going to see trump 2.0. the candidate has promised he will stay the same but his campaign may look a little bit different. that's what we're going to find out as clinton's campaign spokesperson is saying trump's attacks are a distraction from the real issues fac

speech codes. restrict offensive speech. let me just say this is like saying two plus two equals four under the constitution. there is no right not to be offended. and yet on many campuses they think there's a right to a sanitized corridor that they can walk down and not hear anything that offends them. if they do they're allowed today invoke the authority of the university officials to silence the people who offend them. in 1949 the supreme court wrote, accordingly a function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. it may serve its purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction as they are and stirs people to anger. it doesn't give you a right to silence those people that evoke those actions in you. in a free society you've got to tolerate hearing things you don't agree with. at many campuses they do the opposite and try to silence offensive speech. we get things like this, here's a speech code from san francisco state. students are expected to be civil to one another. thi

this will her first speech as the presumptive democratic praerm nominee. >> a big speech.ve prepared a lot of activities and video to go with it. before we go to that let's go to brianna who is in santa monica with the sanders campaign and you're learning more about conversations going on between the sanders camp and the clinton camp. what can you tell us? >> reporter: that's right. we've learned that these conversations have reached the campaign manager level so evjef weaver has been talking to robby mook. they spoke earlier today pretty significant considering the call was made last night by a number of outlets saying hillary clinton had reached that all important number of 2,383 delegates, including super delegates. so they spoke today and this is what i've learned from a source who is familiar with these discussions. i was told by this source that these conversations have been about keeping the lines of communication open so that eventually they can unify the party. they're expecting there will be more conversations moving forward. these conversations were described to

john: another layer of assaulting the free speech. hillary talking about internet censorship with one of her former employees who happens to host the morning show on abc news. she says we have to fight isis on the internet. >> we're going to need help from facebook and youtube and from twitter. they're going to have to help us take down these announcements and these appeals as quickly as they get up. john: so facebook is going to police the internet and take down that anything might be isis appeal? you bet, says hillary. >> we have to deny them online space. this is complicated. you're going to hear all of the usual complaint, freedom of speech, et cetera. like it's an icke thing. >> she said that in the same weekend within 24 hours of donald trump saying we have to shut down parts of the internet. the media only paid attention to trump's statement and not to hillary's. we have a culture of free speech under attack when. you have a government in the name national security in particular. she shifted from mass entertainment now, it's al

this was a character speech more than a foreign policy speech. a roast at times. hillary clinton illiciting boos and cheers and guffaws. she took aim on trump on foreign policy, but mostly his temperament. >> imagine donald trump sitting in the situation room. making life or death decisions on behalf of the united states. imagine him deciding whether to send your spouses or children in to battle. imagine if he had not just his twitter account at his disposal when he is angry, but the entire arsenal? do we want someone thin skinned and someone who lashes out? do we want him anywhere near the button? >> reporter: the timing of this speech is when trump criticized her on foreign policy and he using bad judgment with libya and the vote on the iraq war and her handling of e-mails while secretary of state. christine and miguel. >> brianna keilar, thank you. let's bring in senior media political reporter dylan byers. he joins us from los angeles. >> is it early or late for dylan? >> oh, he's just rolling in from a long night, i'm sure. yesterday, the table is set, it see

the speech she great -- speech she gave last night, how strong is her position?et's pause to reflect for one moment that there was a lot of discussion about the ap call on monday may be taking away some of the grandeur of last night turned out to not be true. do. hillary clinton her she won big last night. we can talk more about california. -- bernie sanders was camped out for two weeks and she still one that in a big way. well-crafted speech -- not just well-crafted but well delivered. called, confident, emphatic. i think she leaves this race with a bigger head of steam than a lot of people expected she would, partly because of the way the race has gone of late but particularly last night which was as good a night as she has had in the entire campaign for mark: last night was a sort of metaphor for the sweet spot that she finds herself in. things could change. you look at last thursday's speech and what has been happening with donald trump and last night's strong performance by hillary clinton, there are two things going on that are huge deal for her. because of

speech.ell-written if he gives that speech with discipline, he will repair a lot of damage for a lot of people. not with everyone. john: today, donald j trump, billionaire, told bloomberg politics that he has five or seven people on his running mate shortlists. we will tell you what he said about that after these words from our sponsors. ♪ john: earlier today, two of our top reporters interviewed donald j trump, billionaire, for an interview about his transition to the general election. joining us now are those very same reporters. jennifer jacobs and michael bender. their story is up on bloomberg politics.com. we teased a few seconds ago the fact that you guys discussed donald trump thinking about his running mate. give us a sense about what trump had to say. jennifer: he says he is narrowed down his short list to about seven. he said the people fall into three categories and he told us that there are two generals on his short list, but he says he's less likely to pick one of those two. he c

trump's speech. and clinton repost. two candidates and their at least at this point campaigns, we're joined by chairman of american conservative union, matt slap. and juan williams. let me start with you matt. it looked as though mr. trump has found focus and energy. >> this long overdue, he announced he would give this speak before the terrible tragedy in orlando, i think it is what republicans want to hear. here is the facts are, is that everyone day that donald trump talks about our economic security, our national security, and the failure of the clinton in government and she is under fbi investigation, is the day he will be winning on the campaign trail, every day he is not talking about those 3 things he will be off message and losing. lou: juan? >> he had a good day. what is interesting this is week you saw corey lowandowski, the pit bull of campaign structure pushed out. paul manafort, takes power in terms of running trump operation, and trump family, daughter and son had a hand in forcing out corey lowandowski,

speech codes. restrict offensive speech. let me just say this is like saying two plus two equals four under the constitution. there is no right not to be offended. and yet on many campuses they think there's a right to a sanitized corridor that they can walk down and not hear anything that offends them. if they do they're allowed today invoke the authority of the university officials to silence the people who offend them. in 1949 the supreme court wrote, accordingly a function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. it may serve its purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction as they are and stirs people to anger. it doesn't give you a right to silence those people that evoke those actions in you. in a free society you've got to tolerate hearing things you don't agree with. at many campuses they do the opposite and try to silence offensive speech. we get things like this, here's a speech code from san francisco state. students are expected to be civil to one another. thi

policy speech of her candidacy but the framing speech for what she will be doing the next five months. so we will be hearing some of what she said on the stump speech as she's going forward. this is something that her campaign thinks is going to really embolden democrats and you can tell by what we saw today this was almost a roast at times. you heard boos, standing ovations, cheers. this is something they think will embolden democrats on the stump. they're also trying to get at moderate republicans who have not gotten behind donald trump. they believe a lot of them have not aligned with donald trump because they're worried about foreign policy, so this is really her play for a wide swathe for folks voting in november. >> brianna keilar. thanks. donald trump is speaking later in san jose. it would be unlike him not to have something to say in response. secretary clinton said there's this. bad performance by crooked hillary clinton. reading poorly from the teleprompter. will it resonate politically? joining us, former obama adviser, david axelrod, hoax of the ax podcast, and former rep

disciplined speech, a scripted speech. a teleprompter speech. some things in it you heard phil mattingly reporting, true. the bosnia claim, for example. others, though, not true. debunked. things like the benghazi claim. why not keep it clean? why put in things that have been debunked. >> i think the issue is that it's false. he's metaphorically saying she was sleeping. she should have been there. multiple requests for security that were not delivered. those are facts. we can say the same about hillary clinton, who has categorically called donald trump a fraud and saying that trump university was a fraud. we could painstakingly fact collect her as well. i think fact checkers sometimes are a little off especially some out there that painstakingly check donald trump. but the fact is, he is right. he laid out facts about the clinton foundation, laid out facts about benghazi. cited victims of benghazi's families who said that hillary clinton lied to them, point blank. these are facts that she has to answer. >> well -- >> i mean, i've interviewed fam

now, my criticism about the speech, which overall i'm very pleased with the speech. i think he could have done a foreign policy speech in a completely separate speech. he could have done just an economic speech and done a good job and he really laid it out. it's old status quo, if you want what you have, you know, get what you got, that you'll get hillary clinton. but if you want something new, then you should look at my campaign. i thought he did a very effective job of doing that. i thought that got lost a little bit when he went off into the foreign policy, although he prosecuted that very, very well. he laid ambassador stevens at the feet of hillary clinton, the creation of isis at the hillary clinton's term as secretary of state, the turmoil in the middle east at her, but it could have been done in a separate speech. i don't know why he really threw the kitchen sink at her in this time. he could have made this a multi-speech event and kept this going. but overall, i thought it was a very effective and good speech. best delivered on teleprompter for sure. >> rick

when he gave a big speech to apac. and when he gave another foreign policy speech. when he really wants to make sure he makes his point, he has been doing that. >> and we saw hillary clinton yesterday talk about the economy. and our new cnn/orc poll shows that's a liability with her with trump. >> she's got a lot of work to do. >> he's actually outperforming her in that category. did she do enough to point out what she would do for the economy or did she spend too much time hammering donald trump's record? >> well, it did feel like she was trying to get under donald trump's skin. she had a couple of one-liners and zingers, talking about his bankruptcies over the years and chapter 11s and all of that. it was definitely a speech that was felt, gauged at him. but it was a second she gave a foreign policy speech and economy speech, laying out her case about why he would be bad for the economy. and the thing that kind of strikes me when you hear her deliver these one-liners, it doesn't sound unlike what mitt romney did a couple weeks ago when he was trying to oppose trum

this evening. >> reading a speech. look, he is a political neophyte who understands this much, that this is a moment, and when you have a moment in a campaign that you have to mark, you don't want to make a mistake. he also i think is probably is self-aware enough to know it should be something he should write and read and not leave it to chance pause when he does, he makes maybe gaffes. he says things that he means but it takes the entire speech off message so that is why this is going to be a speech and just like sarah said, my understanding is that they're hoping that this turns into a thank you republicans, i'm going to turn my guns on hillary clinton now. >> you talked about it being a moment and also a moment more of one i think it's fair to say for former secretary of state hillary clinton. it is a moment of history. we have never in this country, never had a woman who was a major party presidential nominee and she's going to declare herself that and cnn has also another news organizations have had says she has

>> i think the speech was incredibly effective. slate.com which is a liberal news organization came out and said donald trump's speech was terrifyingly effective against hillary clinton. primarily because i think that the republicans for a long time have been look for a leader to come out and really talk about the litany of scandals and really be able to define hillary clinton in such a way that when people look at her they think of her in a negative light, and the fact she has been involved in scandal after scandal, whether it's the email server or the clinton foundation. where she says one thing in her speeches about women's rights and gay rights, but you see her involvement with saudi arabia and countries with atrocious records with gay rights and women's rights. for the republicans waiting and want to go see if this will be a transformational moment for donald trump, i think he succeeded today. charles: i have spoken with donald trump surrogates and they tried to downplay the issue that this was some sort of a pivot. between co

mike rogers says it was a good speech and it was a political speech. would you agree with that?ly. look. i think here's the shape of things to come. hillary has a lot to work with when it comes to donald trump's temperament and foreign policy and he has a lot to work with for her track record and hillary i have so say is very effective is the bin laden raid and tying the decisions of president obama of a crucial moment and everybody thought in america that barack obama did the right thing. it's not over. donald trump is going to be able to fire back at her because her track record can't change and her track record, of course, the status quo of failure around the world, vacuums in the middle east, rise of muslim brotherhood, libya, the vote for the iraq war and then opposition to the surge which bob gates, for political purposes.aid only- so they both have a lot to work with against each other. >> so on your note 069 track record, michael nutter, former philadelphia mayor. hillary clinton supporter. ari makes the point how she's opening herself up. she picking apart the track rec

chris, what did you make of the speech? >> well, it was a masterpiece. it was a great speech. very well constructed. patriotic as hell. those flags were not there by accident. this was a speech which was nationalistic. i did think it was a speech that could have been given before the vietnam war. it was more in the pre-vietnam fra addition of the democratic party. a speech given very strong on defense, no apologies for overreaching and u.s. foreign policy and her case, no apologies for supporting the iraq war, supporting intervention in libya and then in syria. no apologies for that. certainly a speech that bernie sanders would never give in a million years. i think trump's going to be worried by this speech because it was patriotic, nationalistic, talked about our country and it values. it had a couple interesting salients to it. the people in play, people like bill krystal for example, editor of the weekly standard, there's that whole tradition of very strong middle east policy on blaf of israel, she reached for those voters too. i think she was going for the people who don'

speech codes. restrict offensive speech. let me just say, this is like saying two plus two equals four under the constitution. there is no right not to be offended. and yet on many campuses they think there's a right to a sanitized corridor that they can walk down and not hear anything that offends them. if they do, they are allowed to invoke the authority of the university officials to silence the people who offend them. in 1949 the supreme court wrote, accordingly a function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. it may indeed best serve its higher purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates the set -- dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger. it doesn't give you a right to silence those people that evoke those reactions in you. in a free society you've got to tolerate hearing things you don't agree with. at many campuses they do the opposite and try to silence offensive speech. we get things like this, here's a speech code from san francisco state.

hillary clinton's speech yesterday.do you think has been updated to demonstrate a potential strength and reboot of what the campaign means going forward? >> i don't think the speech necessarily will be signaling a reboot. this was kind of already in the works. we know what is coming. a lot of it is based on the anti-clinton book that came out last spring about clinton cash and how donations to the clinton foundation ended up benefitting people who gave them money. i think we end up hearing that from donald trump and that was going to be the subject of whether lewandowski was still the campaign manager or not. we saw yesterday from the campaign awas a much more disciplined campaign. rapid response e-mails coming out, fundraising solicitations, someone who wasn't donald trump taking over twitter account to live tweet at hillary clinton's speech. all of the signs of a functioning campaign. the bad news is we finally got to the point which is 4 1/2 months to go before the general election. >> yesterday trump met with evange

policy speech. it was really a point by point attack on donald trump base ond his -- >> what he's going to do without that and again this goes to some of the base we had in the republican nominees not playing hard ball and the democrats playing hard ball with us and we just more or less turn the other cheek and get stuck with binders full of women and all of this kind of thing and killing a steel worker's wife and not responding and going after the other side. so he's going to play hard ball here. there is just no question about it. and so will the clintons who are well known for doing it. he had lunch with ed klein on the famous books on president obama and hillary clinton and the clintons and all of this sort of thing. he probably read clinton cash and is going to talk about trump university in the news. there is a university that bill clinton was a for profit that he was chancellor of. you know, had some controversy to it. so i imagine he's going to toss just about as much of that including the k

her speech billed as a foreign policy speech last weekend, san diego. really a takedown speech of donald trump. >> andrea mitchell at the brooklyn navy yard, we'll be checking back in with you. we have what passes for news on this primary tuesday night. first contest in the nation, the primary in the state of new jersey which donald trump has taken handily on the republican side. a couple of different conversations going on in this country. one among trump supporters. the other among the news media. and the republican establishment. i'm looking at you, nicole wallace. >> it is remarkable that we are back now tonight on this broadcast, back into the discussion about whether or not good republican party can undo this somehow. >> it is remarkable. >> if he's going to be there at the end. i think to chuck's earlier point, we beat that out of ourselves during the primary. in terms of, stop being surprised by this. >> and our voters beat it out of us. >> do it again, yes. >> we can't undo this. and the voters don't want it undone. i mean, i think trump still

her speech will try to paint trump as a self-interested tycoon. this is a live look right now of the room where she's going to be speaking. a top clinton adviser has already been previewing the peach to say if trump is at the wheel, he will drive the economy off the cliff, and then there's this, a brand new cnn/orc poll shows clinton leading trump 47% to 42%, but there is so much more behind those numbers. let's start first though with trump's shortfall. cnn's jeremy diamond is live outside the marriott marquee in new york city where trump is meeting with evangelical leaders at this hour. but, jeremy, he's heading into this meeting as he sends out a very big fund-raising appeal as john just said and as he posts these dismal fund-raising numbers for the last month. >> reporter: that's right, john and kate. you know, donald trump is sending out this fund-raising e-mail this morning which seems like a little bit of a cry for help from his supporters. he's saying if you can pitch in, if you can help us right now, just as we're experiencing a little bi

the timing of this speech we're curious about. the fact she's in california, still fending off bernie sanders in a primary. why give this national security speech taking on trump now? >> because as you can see from what she's been doing over the last several weeks, she's aware and dealing with the sanders challenge but she's been entirely focused on donald trump and i would say starting with her interview with chris cuomo where she for the first time said she assessed donald trump to be unqualified for the job, she has been making a sort of take down trump case every day. it is the message she is driving. gone as the message of the day is the here is my plan on criminal justice reform, small round tables about immigration reform. it's not the message they're driving anymore the way that they were during the nomination season. right now the clinton campaign sees themselves in a window of time to try to discredit donald trump so that he is not seen as a real viable alternative to her come the fall. that's what they're trying to do.