of course we should be engaging stakeholders. the stakeholders here are not just organizations that are doing work around homelessness. the stakeholders are the 830,000 residents in san francisco and we have a responsibility to represent those stakeholders who are not down at city hall all the time and the people who see this on the street erd -- everyday and impacts them everyday and want these people off the streets and to get services. i think it's completely appropriate for us as policy makers to make that determination on behalf of the city and we know there is not enough homeless outreach going on. we desperately need more. >> supervisor avalos? >> i will let mr. wiener have the last word and let have a vote. city clerk: on the motion supervisor mar, aye, avalos aye, supervisor breed? no, wiener no, farrell no. 2 aye's 3 no. >> okay if there is another motion or a motion to set this aside to another board. >>supervisor john avalos: i would like to make a motion to continue this item for two weeks2 weeks what is the next bud

brazil, thece in ofti-stakeholder, the future multi-stakeholder governance. governments,e for businesses, civil societies and technical organizations to come together and start discussing the networks of governments for the future. what are the principles we will adopt? produceeful this will two things. document thate a describes the core internet governance principles that will define how these networks of governance will evolve. these are important principles. network ort of any any governance model we need to agree on common principles. the second thing it will do is take the existing internet governance ecosystem, and involvement. then expand it. these are two different things. evolve means to take what works well today and it sure that it continues to work in the future. in addition, we need to expand it. what do i mean? are very well working internet governance ecosystem addresses things of the internet. internet. on the how the internet works. something like what icann does. the world is focused on how do we govern what is on the internet. the use of t

how do you notify or engage with stakeholders? how do you develop the collateral? all of those tools and resources will be located in one place with access to the public -- sorry, for the project manager. capabilities development. if you want to improve staff capabilities development, you have to give them tools and resources and you have to give them training. what we'll be doing is establishing an outreach training program and the peer group will be very instrumental in helping us decide in how that program will be structured. evaluation. we have to evaluate. we have to put together ways to evaluate the engagement and the outreach that we conduct and we're working right now on what those methods would be to actually truly evaluate its progress? testing the waters. we have to get out there and try this. and we have to get out there and our commitment is right now that by the end of this fiscal year, at some point we're going to by the end of the fiscal year launch a version of our strategy. it's yet to be determined how we're going to do that, but we're really com

this has been in a month 1/2 now where we have worked with stakeholders on this issue and it's ready to go. i'm convinced and while i appreciate everyone's opinion another week is not going to buy consensus if you will. this is something to me i think should be a priority of ours as a city. as mr. wiener mentioned the city and residents in our neighborhoods to do all we can as soon as we can to get people off the street. i won't be supporting this motion. madam clerk can we do a roll call? >>supervisor john avalos: can i respond to that. it's not about a motion about getting people off the streets. i would like a plan that is more baked. i don't hear that. i have asked for that, i haven't heard that. so let's have a vote. city clerk: on the motion to continue the item for 2 weeks, supervisor mar, aye, avalos aye, breed, no, wiener, no, farrell, no. the motion fails. >> supervisor wiener? >> i would like to make a motion to send this item to the board with full recommendation. city clerk: would you like to adopt? >> first can we have a motion to accept the budget analyst recommendatio

been a process of engaging stakeholders in a deliberate way and talking about developing and refining what these policies will look like. we are in that stage currently. what are we talking about. what should we change, what should we build upon and what should we do next. by may of this year we should finalize what this measure will look like and the of course is the goal to support the reauthorization of the funds. one of the signature i think work strands for all of us interested in this work has been how do we outreach to our community and get authentic voices heard around reauthorization. so what has happened is there has been a 17 member stakeholder council that is comprised of advocate communication organization, school individuals, parent coalitions and youth and we've had a multiple advisory groups and in fact two advisory groups and we've had support from our philanthropic visors to have conversation about what is it that we as a city want to accomplish. there has been a number of lessons and actually input that we heard from the community. so what have we heard from the com

we ensure that stakeholders have a seat at the table.stakeholders are businesses, government -- we have over 130 government thing on the committee. society, we have active organizations, academics, all of them sitting on an equal footing and making sure that these identifiers work. >> are there any competitors to icann? >> this role cannot be ordered by more than one player. managedthan one entity a key identifier of the internet, by nature, the internet will no longer be one that -- one net. at the heart of the matter is the domain name system. very few people appreciate that in order to resolve issues, there is a root system that make that work for the entire planet. in the room, all names are resolved to make sure that when span.org for.c example, or any other website name, you go to the exact i that you want to go to -- site that you want to go to. quite how are you funded? >> when people buy website names, there is a will be that they pay. -- there is a small part of the fee that they pay. that comes to us and ask up to $19 million

been defined as the key stakeholders and what community input has been solicited when you talk about the bike tours i can image dr. espanola jackson riding a bike it seems like our it targeting other people you're not getting the input from the community. i think you need to be very careful or cache when you make assumptions the community is not involved we have technology that's been involved in over a decade that has the capability of cleaning without having floods and can move the sand so when you make the suments we can not only perimeter from an technology standpoint it degrades our community so this is why we have the strategy in place in the first place. when you say you reached you talked about the stakeholder analysis 3 hundred and 16 thousand reached on the social media how about in those zipped how are you reaching the people the oppose nor the social media how are those implicating the community where the sewage is at. like dr. espanola jackson we need to be more involved because according do article 8 b-122 you're supposed to create opportunities for meaningful discussio

in order to develop this approach we've got any stakeholder feedback. the stakeholders included largely groups that have public space and arts and music basis program expertise. those are various agencies o e w t is partnering with the real estate distraction o e w d formed a working group that includes members from the entertainment division and sfmta and the streets and epcot and the planning department and also dpw and real estate. we've collaborated with other city agencies as necessary so, now that i've described some of the stakeholders involved in the process and the city agencies that were involved let me take a few minutes to industry the background. san francisco has come to be known nationally for her innovative approach in the realm. in ways that leverage civic participation. the first example i have here emanates from the parks program we have some staff here. the pavement program has parks that are maintained by neighborhood. another program that is an example is the streets parks program that is a partner between the parks relines and cre

so what has happened is there has been a 17 member stakeholder council that is comprised of advocate communication organization, school individuals, parent coalitions and youth and we've had a multiple advisory groups and in fact two advisory groups and we've had support from our philanthropic visors to have conversation about what is it that we as a city want to accomplish. there has been a number of lessons and actually input that we heard from the community. so what have we heard from the community? the results have been very sobering for all of us. what we heard is a resounding call for us to do more and to do it better. that has been in the voice of parents and youth that has consistently told us that it's still difficult to navigate the system. how do we built bld a system that is navigatable. how do we provide support to our providers and partners in the community and how are we going to align the services to maximum income. estimate the services and how we look at these funds and how do we better the experiences of our students particularly through the lens that are equitable

it makes for a much more happier stakeholder or customer. this is just an overview for you where we are in the strategy. i am the lead, charged with launching the strategy. so i would be the person you would be looking for if you have any questions after this presentation. just to take a quick snapshot, the agency as craig mentioned earlier, oversees anything to do with ground transportation. it's not just the capitol construction project that we here about, but it's many things. it's taxis parking and carshare, a lot of things that the agency oversees. the agenda that i'm going to cover with you today briefly first, i will talk about the current situation. what is the current situation with outreach today? next i will show you the five-step approach that we have taken in developing our public outreach and engagement strategy. i think it's important to show you the methodology that we applied because i'm a firm believer from research from the recommendations. and then we'll go into how we actually scope a project out for the level of outreac

the right information the correct information is being disseminated to the public we rely on the stakeholders on the navy and regulatory agencies of which we have the california department of control and the san francisco public health department and the california public health department and all the water board agencies are working in partnership with us to make sure that when the island is transferred we can be readily assured that the clean up is done to the allowable standards by regulators so everything we're documentation on treasure island is transparent and we'll hold public meetings our stakeholders can attend you can look at on the website and we believe in exactly what we're doctoring this is a development that's gone to transcend maybe 20 years when it's done treasure island yerba buena is the next designation in the bay area. we realize we are strategically located so we're not only looking at roads and transportation our goal is to try to alleviate the heavy traffic about that the bay bridge by spelling your last with the board of transportation so we're in the right communicat

to the zone that aren't agreed by the multiple stakeholders that rely on it. >> so multiple stakeholdersher than the united states alone, and you have some concerns about that. >> i do have some concerns, and my concerns relate to what will happen at the end of the process. vint talks about a process almost as an end in itself, but ultimately there has to be the u.s. is proposing at the end of the day that there be some new entity or some -- you can call it what you will, but there has to be some organization that's managing the internet. this assignment of domain names. and my concern is we don't know now, at the beginning of the process, what that entity will look like, but we do know based on proposals that have been made by several countries in the past -- russia, china, iran -- that their vision of who should control the internet includes some form of government control and government supervision, so you have to be concerned about, at the end of the day, whether there can be an organization, entity, whatever, at the is doing what icann does today, the entity that now controls the ar

i think you need to do a lot of work to convince the stakeholders this isn't only about privatization only to distinguish this is a public uses with a civic use vs. the privatization of public spaces. one thick i'd like to talk about part of the problem you have is p zoning it means public it's from the city hall from the plazas like plaza it's universities and schools basically anything this is for public use. it's hard to draw a set of controls for the use when it's got to cover all kinds of different uses some are open space uses and buildings that are owned by public entities we might want to distinguish between open space uses and other public buildings that will allow you to do a set of planning controls that makes sense. parks and plazas and on the other hand the parks and use. other cities make the distinction. mostly we have mission bay that has it's on open space and park merced and ti do it's useful we've created the designation 3 times. you might want to look at as you're doing the planning code changes amended our zoning map to create the distinction. if you did that you

the right information the correct information is being disseminated to the public we rely on the stakeholders on the navy and regulatory agencies of which we have the california department of control and the san francisco public health department and the california public health department and all the water board agencies are working in partnership with us to make sure that when the island is transferred we can be readily assured that the clean up is done to the allowable standards by regulators so everything we're documentation on treasure island is transparent and we'll hold public meetings our stakeholders can attend you can look at on the website and we believe in exactly what we're doctoring this is a development that's gone to

the method we looked at a bunch of materials including be academic research and did a bunch of stakeholder academies and advocates and tried to say what's the right context for san francisco how do we fit in about that. the main finding that led to the recommendations that san francisco is well suited for bike sharing and recreational bike sharing as well 90 percent of the strips in san francisco we should note that the highest is alameda couldn't they don't have any bicycles in the county their buying the system here in san francisco really bike sharing works at the recreational level. in addition even though there's a recreational system the model today is not the only way to get the recreational benefits. there's ways to create the standards and potentially more disperse in terms of the decentralization. so there's more than one way to skin the cat and achieve the goals. the region is trying to figure out the regional structure it may take time there's a timeframe noerg it doesn't have to be done today but pursuing the system we want to support thought or the region today >> could i spe

and to the neighborhood and stakeholder we're collaborating to get this done. thank you, commissioners i urge you to adapt this 19th avenue study >> i see cynthia from the galleria. >> we wanted to acknowledge the wonderful leadership this collaborative are partnering has had and thank you for the opportunity to participate and want to see solutions and improvements and will continue to support the project. >> so with no other partners speaking let's open this up for public comment. i have a couple of cards (calling names) and anyone else who wants to speak please come forward >> i'm katie work with the west side group. i wanted to thank liz as well. i have 3 points to make first of all, lots of outreach was done including with residents in our area. and as part of one of those outreach sessions we conducted a very inform survey i wanted to say that 70 percent felt neighbors support of tunnel. going through our area the reason we got together was some of the options were unpopularity so it was a good way to that was a prospective bridge through our neighborhood

we heard from stakeholders on both sides. we heard the idea from connecting from the rainbow market along division, but ultimately the travel time was better on 11th and the land uses were more conducive to transit. that's something once we implement we could modify. the policy advisory group recommended not to pursue the proposals including the extension to vallejo which was controversial and as well as 56 and 66. the recommended modifying the 61 and 43 and 58. i will walk through those briefly. >> the original proposal of the 26 would have extended the length to haight street. under the advised proposal we would change the relative frequency but not modifying the route. the six would run about a 12-minute and 6 l would run about every 7 minutes. we have concerns from folks in the lower haight concerns about reduced frequency that would now happen on the local stops of the 6th, while that is a trade off for the corridor, what we are seeing over all is we will allow these stops limited as more and more folks walking to the li

well and i have been involved with these programs through c pack and i would like to get these stakeholders together because we have not finalized a children's fund amendment to go before the board of supervisors and onward to the ballot as well. i know there is still room to move and to come to some consensus and i'm really dedicated to making sure that we can that have consensus and have that input. i believe there are probably some differences that we still have to work out and how to move forward. so the process that coc has done and what you come up with in terms of your recommendations. i really appreciate the outreach effort that you have gone through. i would like to ask that maybe we can put more meet -- meat on the bones and if you can describe what you can put forward regarding language to give us a sense of whenever we need to go in terms of coming together and having unity. >> supervisor avalos you are referring to these policy solution here? >> yes. >> okay. in terms of cheaper are you talking specifically about our proposal to create the children and family council as well as

is an think data security area where working with consumer stakeholders and corporate and other stakeholders that have access to the data would be a good approach? -- ashink self-regulation long as you have a robust standard that is developed is very important. i absolutely support that. robust as you have standard and if you have an i amcer such as the ftc, going to think that will be very important work to complement the enforcement work that we do. >> what kind of work do you do with the fcc on these types of issues? >> we collaborate very closely with them and a number of different areas and that includes enforcing the do not call rule. we work very closely together. authorityrespective in this particular ecosystem, we do work with them on a regular basis. >> you mentioned the common carriers. over at the fcc, the companies that are considered common carriers are looking to transform the networks which under current fcc regulation are considered to be failure networks. that and the implications and interactions between you and the fcc in terms of the system -- you have greater enforcemen

to consider that this stewardship is ready to be passed to the stakeholders. as it has alwaysen visaged. the time has come. ask and i think the u.s. appreciates that and appreciates that it's the interests of the u.s. and the interest of the world for the stewardship to go to the multistakeholder mode el at icann. >> i mean, in that case is there someone or some entity that takes over the oversight function of icann or -- >> guest: icann itself is made legitimate through its accountability to all the stake hold holders. everything at icann, i know i have the president constitute l l, but frankly, most things get decided by the stakeholders, not me. bottom up. and it works. it has worked for years, and it will continue to work. i think the u.s. government in its wisdom wanted to wait until they were certain that the bottom-up multistakeholder model of accountability at icann is working well, it's delivering good results. the leaders of the staff at ica, this n are -- icann are able to institutionalize these functions and follow this very important spirit, and a

we hope consumer stakeholders in this discussion will engage in the comprehensive discussion of the update. this will be a time consuming process, however, and as my colleague, mr. shimkus explained to politico last week, the telecom rewrite is not for sissys. the video marketplace is not a model structure by any stretch of the imagination. today's witnesses represent diverse parts that have ecosystem. the drafting cable, direct broadcast satellite, and retail top box industries are well represented on our panel, as well as public interest community. i thank our witnesses for being here today. i appreciate your counsel. i yield the remaining time to the vice chair of the committee, mr. lat why. >> i thank the chairman -- mr. latta. >> i thank the chairman and also appreciate hold the hearing. and our witnesses for testifying. thank you. today we take another opportunity to examine the video marketplace in the context of the satellite television extension localism act re-authorization. we can all agree that there has been a tremendous amount of innovation and technological advancement in th

but it is including, but not limited to and really subject to more discussion and community stakeholder ictionv put. ~ input. >> so, are he we going with any city department that is doing this type of work, or how are we -- how do we come up with the general scope of work for these projects? >> well, i think through the budget process also, we will need to include this in our budget and other city departments will need to put that in their budget as well. so, we'll need to be working to make a proposal and you'll see it on your side as we propose it in the budget. this is what we want to do, similarly on their side. so, further, this is not to restrict it to any city department. this gives us -- this is sort of a place holder to give us the expenditure authority and we need to do the next steps which would be to sort of identify what department is the most appropriate department. >> just a follow-up, the department of finance has not put any other kind of special instructions on this other than it has to go to capital improvements? >> that's just a tax exempt bond restriction for any ta

the authority is eager to continue to work with our community folks and stakeholders. thank you >> thank you. are there any other comments. so seeing none, we'll move into our next item >> to the agreement of density audit to extend the com satisfaction. >> this is extending our auditors contract for two years it's straightforward. >> you want approve. >> we have a. >> martin luther consenting. chair kim that's 5 i's and item 79 is approved arrest item 10 the updated initial report and the resolution of project for the allocation to 11 with or with the amount of 11 portfolio plus million >> i'm happy to answer any questions but this is the standard process of receiving fund from a mc. >> moved. >> second. >> director lee and a martin luther. >> vice chair harper. >> chair kim. >> puffed. >> this is the approving of the minutes from. >> can we call item 11 and 12 together. >> 11 being approving the minute of the last meeting and the january 24th meeting. >> move approval. >> so we have a motion i did want to make sure that director edward reiskin requested for the last

caltrain has been collaborating with regional stakeholders and we'll look at the 2012 high speed rail business plan established the basis for the blend approach and that was solid if i did in the - we call that the e i p additional established established a regional basis of support for the caltrain cord ultimately to support future high speed rail. then you see here there's an additional agreement between the high speed rail that again reiterates support for the investment program. so moving on to the project that is the subject of the current eir we're working on the draft will be out at the end of this month. it's a one $.5 billion project contained of 3 elements the first is an advanced system we're call c boss and the two other elements that are slightly after that is the corridor electrification program and the vehicles we're going to use with the system are e n us. so briefly to discuss this c boss signal system essentially it's a system that has two basic elements the first element is to comply with the requirement of the 2008 safety improvement act. this establishes federally

when you say you reached you talked about the stakeholder analysis 3 hundred and 16 thousand reached on the social media how about in those zipped how are you reaching the people the oppose nor the social media how are those implicating the community where the sewage is at. like dr. espanola jackson we need to be more involved because according do article 8 b-122 you're supposed to create opportunities for meaningful discussions for the programs that doesn't mean picking a couple of people who are going on along with what i want. that doesn't mean that the community can't provide input you'd be surprised what we can contribute. i don't want you to over look we - the agenda information i don't see anything about the revenue strategy it says the offset of the revenue what is the revenue strategy generated to cover the cost and why is there a deficit we want to know the strategy for that facility. i mean, if there's too much to cover in a short term the whole reason for the mitigation is the wrongdoing that the city has done to the community and its community has been eliminate in the o

the public grounds and has several things that enhance collaboration with city staff and other stakeholders it will strengthen san francisco vibrant community. beyond supporting the local community near the plaza s it could support communities of artists and musicians. the plazas program tries to improve the cities ability to practice for clean and safe open space than is currently available with city resources. this timeline shows the elective schedule if the program is adapted implementation could give up in may we hope to adapt 3 plaza by the end of 2014. >> just in the interest of time i want to do a couple of issues really quickly. how is this program not promoting privatization. those are publicly owned properties these will be accessible with minor people to walk across the city we're working with the stakeholders to help maintain the undertaking their city public-private open space. they've go through a vetting process with the city staff and each one will go through this board of supervisors and at the full board before approved. if the steward doesn't meet their obligations we'll

the district as well as other local jurisdictions and stakeholder to agree on the standards. what is the bare minimum that the standards should be so to make sure we have the system prasht ability. so the mta should develop the system in the long-term. basically to continue to have the funding and the business plan that kind of idea but same thing maintain the recreational definition it might be more down the line the goals will make sense for synergy purposes. we recommend the region has a hybrid model to spin-off a nonprofit that's strongly supported by a public entity; right like with the 501 program and for jurisdictions that don't want to to do their own presumed to be innocent and programs that meet the programs that want to go ahead and make efforts on their own to make sure the region is supporting those efforts as well. and just finally >> so that means you can have other jurisdictions that can run the regions. >> yes. along with the capital matter just you making sure their speaking to one another and complimenting each other that's the goal. the other consideration