and even more by your starmer and even more two take place here in the next two or three hours.nsted airportjust after ”am this morning. and at stansted airportjust after ”am this morning. ar moment in can presidents lenski and trump can be rebuilt, can restored, be rebuilt, can be restored, whether there is a deal the us to be struck and if not, what european can do. what european nations can do. a certain amount of anxiety and what european nations can do. a certain amount of anxiety al this building behind me because this was not part of the much of this week was carefully choreographed on that much of this week was carefully cho visit �*aphed on that much of this week was carefully cho visit to hed on that much of this week was carefully cho visit to the on that much of this week was carefully cho visit to the white t did not have was the did thatave was the did that was vas the did that was not the sovereignty. that was not something he managed sovereignty. that was not somethir happened ged sovereignty. that was not somethir happened in d sovereignty. that was not somethir

europeans now, and a keir starmer�*s leadership, europeans coming together to really hammer out whatupport a future peace deal which is not yet there are so step—by—step. but it is important that you start planning for this. and akio starmer�*s visit on thursday i think was very successful because, clearly, there was an understanding that we have to work on this together. can you see a future — work on this together. can you see a future where _ work on this together. can you see a future where the - work on this together. can you see a future where the us - work on this together. can you | see a future where the us does stop its military support for ukraine? i stop its military support for ukraine? ., stop its military support for ukraine? . ., , , ukraine? i am absolutely convinced _ ukraine? i am absolutely convinced that _ ukraine? i am absolutely convinced that the - ukraine? i am absolutely convinced that the us i ukraine? i am absolutely i convinced that the us wants ukraine? i am absolutely - convinced that the us wants to bring ukraine to this durable peace. it was what all

prime minister, keir starmer. i mean, this is a critical meeting at the prime minister's residence as it comes one day after a contrasting visit at the white house, where it did start off with a handshake with president trump, but then in the oval office devolved into something else. and this meeting with keir starmer happening a day ahead of a meeting between zelenskyy and european leaders at a summit. let's go to nic robertson, who is outside ten downing street. all right. well, you saw it live as it unfolded really just moments ago. just seconds before we came out of the break there. talk to us about that greeting and what is at stake. >> hugely important. very symbolic. mostly when leaders pull up here, with a few exceptions, they pull up right at the steps of downing street. they get a handshake on the door step and they bound inside. it was different with president zelenskyy. carefully choreographed his vehicle, pulled up dozens of yards short of the doorway at number ten. um, he came out. he walked up the s

but first president zelensky will meet with sir keir starmer, this is the scene live

but first president zelensky will meet with sir keir starmer, this is the scene live

but first president zelensky will meet with sir keir starmer, this is the scene live in downing street. european leaders have lined up to show their support for, as politicians express fears for the future of western security. british prime minister sir keir starmer will host ukrainian president volodymyr zelensky at downing street this afternoon. the ukrainian delegation is now in london, after flying in from the us. this was the moment the plane touched down ahead of tomorrow's meeting with european leaders in london for a security summit. the meeting between the two leaders follows president zelensky�*s clash with president trump and vice presidentjd vance in the oval office yesterday. president trump accused the ukrainian leader of "gambling with world war three", and of not being gratefulfor the support of the us. president zelensky made it clear there should be "no compromises" with president putin. following those exchanges, the president of ukraine was ordered to leave the white house, and the american minerals deal was not signed. the us president later said president zelensky

we've heard that keir starmer has spoken to zelenskyy immediately after the call. he has also spoken to president trump and also to hearing from nato secretary mark rutte, who has said today that he believes zelenskyy has to fix his relationship with president trump and the senior american leadership team. so clearly, a signal in public here from the same european countries that in great length and great publicity, voiced their support for ukraine immediately after these extraordinary scenes in the white house. now, i think publicly realizing that they really need to go forward with the trump administration at their back. zelenskyy saying that he believes this can be resolved. we simply have to see what is doable in this european leaders meeting. they really have never had to conceive the notion of their collective security without the united states being with them. that's not necessarily off the table here. last week, trump said that he would have the united kingdom's back. he has very cordial relations with france's emmanuel macron. but europe's position is so di

and europe stand in all this as sir keir starmer prepares to host european leaders in london this weekend through what happened at the white house today. things started off cordelia and as per usual for these events between the two presidents. but doing questions, tensions ran high. voices were raised and an angry president trump warned president volodymyr zelenskyy that he was gambling with world war iii. following the meeting, ukrainian president zelenskyy left the white house without sending that deal on minerals in ukraine, and canceling a planned press conference. as the ukrainian president departed, president trump wrote on social media, "i have determined that president zelenskyy is not ready for peace if america is involved. he disses back united states of america in its cherished oval office. he can come back when he is ready for peace." let's go back to the start of that meeting, which began in friendlier circumstances with both leaders saying they were ready for an agreement that could help to bring an end to the war in ukraine. let's have a listen back. >> your soldiers have b

what now can starmer do. he's already been to the white house. he set the table. macron has set the table. duda of poland has already met with with president trump. is there any strategy that's clear that could bring president trump back onside into the coalition with with europe to offer these security guarantees? they're hoping for? >> they weren't. >> getting those. security guarantees before the blow up. so, i mean, it's been consistently trump saying that the europeans have to do a lot more now. i think it is conceivable that if the europeans are able to put a lot more money on the table for the ukrainians, if they're able and willing to send a lot of troops on the ground in the event of an agreed to ceasefire, it's always possible that trump can say, look, uh, biden couldn't get that done. i'm i'm the one that got european leadership done, and now i'm prepared, um, to get back in the room with my european allies. but that is not close to where we are right now. trump has shown much greater interest in getting a deal with putin, who, according to trump, has t

this weekend and told reporters that starmer is a, quote, "very good person doing a very good job."

. >> and keir starmer. >> from britain, bringing what i call bringing fruits to the volcano. essentially. essentially trying to pacify this sort of irrational force of nature. and they get they get a little bit, you know, when you when you abase yourself to trump for quite rational reasons. >> i'm not. >> criticizing macron or. >> starmer for. >> trying that. >> method first. but when you. >> base yourself to trump, you get a little bit of a reprieve. >> this was. >> an extremely short reprieve because the day after starmer left, we see, i think, the most infamous episode in modern us diplomatic history, the berating of the victim and that his presentation as the culprit, zelensky as the culprit. an extraordinary spectacle that trump allowed. >> to run. >> on and on and on. he wanted it. >> and he said. and he. >> said, there's a. >> reason i let this. >> drag on. >> yes. >> i wanted the american. people to see this. >> and it wasn't just because it was going to be. >> good tv. now, bear with me here. >> i don't think it's. >> an accident that we have somebody in the. >> oval

this weekend and told reporters that starmer is a, quote, "very good person doing a very good job."nd starmer said trump is the current president of the united states. [ laughter ] while speaking last week at the march for life, vicece preside j.d. vance said, quote, "let me say, very simply, i want more babies in the united states of america. i guess that's easy to say when you don't have to fly commercial. [ light laughter ] [ audience oohs ] at his rally over the weekend in las vegas, president trump said that if you call a woman beautiful, it is, quote, "the end of your political career." if anybody can think of something worse that someone did without getting canceled, raise your hand. [ laughter ] [ audience oohs ] no, no, no. no! the cia released a new assessment over the weeknd that said the covid-19 pandemic originated from a lab leak in china. and i think we all owe someone and apology. and they're blind. [ laughter ] so don't just send an email. you need to do this in person. costco announced last week they will be switching their food court soda fountains from pepsi to c

and first of all, the united kingdom, prime minister starmer has good relationships with trump. we need ammunition, we need weapons, we need intelligence. it's too serious. and now putin is super emboldened. now he thinks he can, that ukraine can be just the first target and first prey, and you can move on because he sees what a deep division is between united states and europe. and this is bad. we need to heal this division right now. militarily, how long do you think you could last without the us support? i'm not a military expert. i mean, we will fight. we fought in 2022, three years ago without any support at the beginning and we stopped russians. but it's three years after. we have a lot... we lost a lot of people. we are very tired and exhausted. i mean, we will fight. we don't have any other option because in other case, russians will kill people like me. they will take our sons to go and to kill people like you. that's what they will do. but so we will continue to fight. but the question is the life of tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of people, and what will be

in the back please. >> prime minister starmer claims repeatedly that his government believes in free speech and is not engaged in censorship but people are being arrested and they are pressuring companies to censor americans. how can he be a reliable partner when he says things that are demonstrably false on an important topic? pres. trump: we spoke to him and we thought they took it too far. jd was very strong on it and so was i. so was marco. would you like to say something? >> we have concerns with the conduct, of the, particularly as it impacts americans, and there's concern that american speech could fall into the hands of any country's jurisdiction. this is a point that the vice president made at you -- at munich is that what unites us is shared values and one of them is free speech so we will need to take action in that regard. pres. trump: it's a very important question. v.p. vance: we spoke about this in detail with the prime minister and others at lunch yesterday and i know the secretary of commerce followed up in private meetings last night. this is really important. we be

in the back please. >> prime minister starmer claimed repeatedly that his government believes in free speech and is not engaged in censorship. pressuring american companies to censor americans. how can he be a reliable partner when he says things that are demonstrably false? >> we spoke to him about that yesterday. we thought they took it very much too far. jd was very strong on it, so was i. so was marcoux and we have been speaking to them about it. >> we have concern with the conduct that impacts americans. there is real concern that american speech which is online could fall into the hands of british or any jurisdiction. what unites us was europe as much as anything else in these shared values, one of them being free speech. if americans are threatened by it, we are going to need to take action in that regard. >> it's actually very important question. >> we spoke about this in detail with the prime minister and the foreign secretary and others at lunch yesterday. secretary of commerce let nick followed up in private meetings last night, this is really important. we believe american

you had macron and starmer this past week both of whom praised the pathway towards peace. part of that is re-engaging russia something the previous leaders lacked the conviction to do so. what gave you the moral courage and conviction to do that and lead that? president trump: boy, i love this guy. who are you with? >> one america news. president trump: i like the question. i think it's a very good question. it is. it's a pathway to peace. it's a pathway to getting something solved. and i feel as the head of this country, i have an obligation to doing that. we got involved. it's too bad we got involved because there should have been no involvement because there should have been no war. there should haven't been october 7. that could be have -- would have never happened. iran was broke. they had no money to give to hezbollah, hamas. they were stone cold broke. and then under biden they became rich as hell. it went from no money to $300 billion in a period of four years. and they gave a lot of that money away. and you see what happened. that's a real mess also that we hope t

ukrainian president zelensky is in london today to meet with prime minister keir starmer.ter yesterday's heated exchange between president trump and vice president vance and zelensky. yesterday's white house meeting was meant to begin negotiations over ukraine's rare earth minerals, when it suddenly turned into that war of words. with cameras rolling, the three men raising their voices over one another in the oval office. you invited me to have our military equipment. this war would have been over in two weeks. in three days? i heard it from putin in three days. this is something less than two weeks. of course. yes. it's going to be a very hard thing to do business like this. zelensky was asked to leave the white house, cutting his visit short without signing that agreement. before leaving washington, president zelensky appeared with bret baier on fox news, commenting on that rocky relationship with president trump. do you think your relationship with donald trump, president trump, after today can be salvaged? yes, of course, because it's relations more than two presidents

starmer brought the letter from the king calling for another state visit. i mean, they've done all of the diplomacy. what can they accomplish? what can they do now to try to get or keep the president, president trump on side? >> that's a very good question. i think that the british government is trying to do their best both to do what works best with trump, with open flattery, for example, while at the same time trying to maintain their principled support of ukraine. i think they will try to bring the united states back in. they will try to revive the minerals deal, because that is the one thing that is the greatest incentive for the united states to become involved and remain involved. whether they can do so remains to be seen, but that is our hope that they can bring the u.s. and ukraine back together. >> and if they they get them on side and they get the security guarantees. you know, the kremlin saw what happened yesterday. how credible are those guarantees when you have a president who is, at best, reluctantly going to offer those guarantees? >> yeah.

you have this summit called by keir starmer with such heightened stakes in terms of practical steps they they might be able to take, as to how to upkeep security out into the country and how to stand up against russian aggression and police a cease-fire in ukraine, but we are still talking about a war that is raging. it is not over. helena: james, thank you. let's get that reaction and bring in our russian editor, steve rosenberg -- russia editor, steve rosenberg. talk us through what we are hearing from the kremlin. steven: nothing yet. so far there has been no comment from vladimir putin about what happened in the white house. then again, president putin does not need to say anything about what happened in the white house, not right now. he can't afford to allow events to play out. donald trump a little earlier said this is going to be great television. you can imagine him sitting in front the television set and enjoying the spectacle of his fiercest enemy, the leader of the country that vladimir putin invaded three years ago, being so publicly rebuked by the president of the united st

he's meeting with the british prime minister, keir starmer, who along with the french prime minister, their french president. they're trying to figure out what non america nato looks like or what a defense alliance in europe looks like. if the united states is not just unreliable, but might be on the other side at some point. tell me about this. is that is that is that a good or a bad development? everybody has woken up to the fact that america, for the moment, may not be on our team. >> well. >> you know, first of all, i just want to be blunt to ali for the moment, you know, the first time trump was president, there was a lot of for the moment, maybe america will kind of return to being what we wanted it to be after yesterday. this will never go back. it's over. you know, we could try to rebuild it, you know, at some point in the future, i would like to see an american president try to build some new alliances with europe. they're not going to think of the united states the same way ever again after what they saw yesterday. and so i think whether it's good or bad, it's necessary for

you saw what happened with macron, kier starmer.a. >> trace: chanley painter. >> i agree. i think the american people appreciate the transparency of the trump administration and maybe the white house could make available official oval office boxing gloves since so many jabs were landed today. >> trace: something. christina. >> i think it was great for the american people and world leaders, everyone to see their dynamic. it was so good to see the president be firm. he's always firm but it was much better than hearing biden say don't. >> trace: put it out there and let us decide. >> i love it and i think everybody who watched it loves it. there's no secret sauce, these are human beings that are negotiating. this was a negotiation. i think it should happen at every one of these meetings, win, lose or draw. >> trace: glenn says it had to be public or trump would have been blamed for the failure. christopher, all such meetings should be public. tammy says they should have been private, sometimes we just don't need to see how the sausage

the event, hosted by uk prime minister keir starmer following a contentious visit to the white houseday that was cut short after what was supposed to be a diplomatic meeting with president trump turned into a shouting match. >> we're not in a good position. you don't have the cards right now with us. you start having cards. cards right now. you don't. when you're playing cards, you're playing cards. you're gambling with the lives of millions of people. you're gambling with world war three. >> zelenskyy was at the white house to sign an agreement giving the u.s. access to ukraine's mineral resources. there, he expressed hesitation about a broader ceasefire deal that does not include security guarantees, pointing to vladimir putin breaking past peace deals. >> he broke the ceasefire. he killed our people and he didn't exchange prisoners. we signed the exchange of prisoners, but he didn't do it. what kind of diplomacy jd you are speaking about? >> sources say trump demanded zelenskyy leave the white house and cut his visit short, leaving the previously agreed upon minerals deal unsigned

the event, hosted by uk prime minister keir starmer following a contentious visit to the white housefriday that was cut short after what was supposed to be a diplomatic meeting with president trump turned into a shouting match. >> we're not in a good position. you don't have the cards right now with us. you start having cards. cards right now you don't. you're playing cards. you're playing cards. you're gambling with the lives of millions of people. you're gambling with. world war three. >> zelenskyy was at the white house to sign an agreement giving the u.s. access to ukraine's mineral resources. there, he expressed hesitation about a broader ceasefire deal that does not include security guarantees, pointing to vladimir putin breaking past peace deals. >> he broken the ceasefire, he killed our people and he didn't exchange prisoners. we signed the exchange of prisoners, but he didn't do it. what kind of diplomacy jd you are speaking about? >> sources say trump demanded zelenskyy leave the white house and cut his visit short, leaving the previously agreed upon minerals deal unsigned.

the event, hosted by uk prime minister keir starmer following a contentious visit to the white house friday that was cut short after what was supposed to be a diplomatic meeting with president trump turned into a shouting match. >> we're not in a good position. you don't have the cards right now with us. you start having cards. cards right now you don't. you're playing cards. you're playing cards. you're gambling with the lives of millions of people. you're gambling with. world war three. >> zelenskyy was at the white house to sign an agreement giving the u.s. access to ukraine's mineral resources. there, he expressed hesitation about a broader ceasefire deal that does not include security guarantees, pointing to vladimir putin breaking past peace deals. >> he broken the cease fire. he killed our people and he didn't exchange prisoners. we signed the exchange of prisoners, but he didn't do it. what kind of diplomacy jd you are speaking about? >> sources say trump demanded zelenskyy leave the white house and cut his visit short, leaving the previously agreed upon minerals deal unsigne

zelenskyy is going to meet with the uk prime minister starmer today. there is this summit tomorrow. what can europe do now to to to bring the president, president trump, back into the circle. they've already done all of the diplomacy to set up what was supposed to happen yesterday. is there anything they can do to to reconcile. >> there are things europe can do, but. >> let me just. >> address. >> something that was said. i mean. >> this was. really a photo op. i, you know, i used to work in the white house. >> um, all president zelenskyy had to do was just be silent at that point. um, knowing that there was a pettiness. >> to the president or anything. >> else, just be silent and make his point. in private. the strategic. >> reason why. >> he was there. was to get the support of the united states, sign the deal, get the support united states. so i just want to make sure that's clear that that's something president zelenskyy could have done. um, overall, now, as far as europe, europe, uh, in supporting ukraine, they can continue to support ukraine, both politically, diplomatically a

it's being hosted by prime minister keir starmer, who was also at the white house, ingratiated himselfpresident donald trump, offered a state visit, a letter from the king. and that is what they were hoping that president zelenskyy would do. he didn't do that because he felt he had to stand up for his people. and so these leaders, when they meet in the uk, have to figure out a way to salvage this relationship between the uk, between ukraine and the donald trump administration. even though president zelenskyy did tell fox news that he feels it can still be salvaged. so that's one thing. leaders of germany and france and sweden and denmark and the netherlands, turkey will all be at this meeting. they're hoping to deliver that thing that president zelenskyy was asking for at the white house. those security guarantees from the u.s. in fact, maybe some air cover if there is going to be some deal to end the war. that's one thing. but the italian prime minister, giorgio melanie, who's been an ally of president trump, also did stand with ukraine. she says any division in the west favors those

and i think they were concerned about trump's weakness or softness with macron and starmer. that's why jd vance was there. i think jd vance came in to create this crisis and up to his interference, it was all more. again, trump. trump was trump. but but jd vance intentionally provoked the crisis. and then it was very easy. trump fired up. >> well, he got fired. >> because he was lying. i mean, he was pushing the same lies. you know, he was a straight face the same way he did it in munich, facing the europeans, saying, you're a bunch of suckers and losers. the same. he's you know, he knows how to deliver. and he knew exactly that. trump will jump. you know, when zelenskyy tried to actually to correct the facts. >> you know, on that moment when you see you see zelenskyy laying out the times the ceasefire has been broken and trump's annoyed at times, he jumps in and tries to make the point. well, i wasn't president then, but it is jd vance. i think it's disrespectful for you to come to the oval and then he and the whole thing turns, you know, sort of jumped in to come to the de

prime minister volodymyr zelenskyy arrived at ten downing street to meet with uk prime minister keir starmeraine. this meeting comes a day after that contentious meeting with president donald trump and vice president jd vance. so many of us are told from a young age to shoot for the stars, but few of us will actually reach them. my next guest dreamed of joining nasa and becoming an astronaut, but that dream suffered a horrifying setback when she was sexually assaulted while attending harvard university. upon learning that her rape kit would be destroyed after six months, she set forth on a path speaking up for sexual assault survivors, successfully helping to pass federal legislation in the sexual survivors rights act, as well as passing a historic global resolution at the united nations. and this week, it was announced that this spring, she's going to join an all female crew to become the first woman of vietnamese descent to fly in space with blue origin. joining me now is amanda nguyen, activist, nobel peace prize nominee and astronaut and the author of the forthcoming book saving five a m

think when you're looking at all the world leaders that have come through from macron to netanyahu to starmer, there's always been a way that they've approached you. you're deferential. you don't challenge. zelenskyy showed up wearing what he wanted to wear. he showed up challenging toe to toe trump. that's not a style they're used to in the oval office, let alone with donald trump. what's happened after this? abbey tonight in real time, yesterday or tomorrow? there are supposed to be a lot of leaders from around europe gathering together in london to talk about once there was some sort of a peace deal in with ukraine. how do we counter and support? do we send troops from our country? how do we help fund ukraine and the global security pact in europe? i am hearing from one source that there are more leaders showing up to this meeting than were actually expected to show up. people have watched this. they really understand it and they've taken note. >> there was one european official who said it. now it's time for a new leader of the free world. but my question to you is what's wrong with that

um, it'll be led by macron and starmer. france and britain. look for the poles to play an important role here. look for the baltics, who are small countries but mighty in their fear and detesting russia. look for the swedes, the swedes and the finns who have long bad history with russia. i think there's plenty of will to go with that capacity. i think the euros are going to step up here. >> okay. if if the united states collapses its support for ukraine, if it greatly diminishes what its heretofore been doing for ukraine, and if the europeans don't fill the void, for how much longer can ukraine hold out on the battlefield against russia? how long can they go it alone? >> they can't go it alone for any reasonable amount of time. but assuming the europeans even continue their current level of aid. and let's do the numbers for a minute here. um, the u.s. thus far in three years has provided about 120 billion. call it 40 billion a year. the europeans have provided in total all forms of aid. well, well, more than that. 160 to 180 billion. so there

we'll see something come out of this meeting between zelensky and starmer, the prime minister. >> that's happening. >> now, that's happening now. it's going to roll forward. the us will be cut out of our security relationships. europeans are going to go it alone. we had this brief moment in which the us was really the sole superpower. yes. and we could do that because we were supported by nato, the european atlantic, euro-atlantic alliance, with the europeans choosing to go it alone because they know that the us won't be there. we'll have this break towards what our adversaries want. multi-polarity slightly smaller states having influence over their regions, and then that kind of more lopsided advantage that they have, that it's the europeans against russia, not as much of a mismatch as us and nato, and that the us is not reliable in the pacific. so china could have its way. it becomes a far, far more dangerous world. our our adversaries are gleeful, our enemies are reeling and trying to figure out what to do next. >> before world war two, when germany went into sudetenland and took over

potentially replace the united states as the key diplomatic player, the key backer of ukraine, and keir starmer in the yocan. you said zelenskyy just arrived in london. it is because the you can is now trying to an emergency summit. and zelenskyy did put out a series of messages this morning on social media thanking president trump, thanking the united states repeatedly, but insisting that they need security guarantees. they can't just take vladimir putin's word for it that he will stop the invasion, that he won't invade ukraine again. ukraine said and president zelenskyy has said time and time again putin's words aren't to be believed, they're not to be trusted, we need security guarantees. president trump clearly doesn't want to provide them and had this outburst when zelenskyy kept pressing the point, and he was called, you know, being disrespectful to the office. europe is now trying to turn its shock and horror into some sort of action, but it is not likely, peter, that the europeans are going to take this burden and be able to shoulder it alone. they still need american participation. it

>> and starmer. >> and starmer. >> starmer had a card so why not play it early. >> he looked he lookedt, you know he's not got a great personality i don't think. keir starmer he's don�*t think. keir starmer he's never going to appear well in that situation. but just the act of pulling out that he knew that trump trump was gonna be impressed by it. i think it worked. and you compare it to what happened yesterday and it's chalk and cheese. >> what's your hairiest negotiation. >> for you? >> for you? >> well, i�*ll tell you a very >> well, i'll tell you a very different story, but it does. it does concern ukraine. i went to ukraine in the days when it had just emerged from the soviet union, and it still was a big drinking culture. 50 i went to a dinner with the defence minister, who was a military chap, and every seventh toast was to the ladies, and these were vodkas. and when i say every seventh, you can understand that there were 14 or understand that there were 1a or 20 1 or 28 toasts. understand that there were 1a or 201 or 28 toasts. i don�*t remember. and it was just a struggle to r

it is an interesting challenge for keir starmer, how do you handle such a complex situation? starmer did not treat last night like many european leaders, did not treat last night like many europeé quoted 's, did not treat last night like many europeé quoted saying that spokesperson quoted saying that he had both spoken to president spokesperson quoted saying that he had both sy that| to president spokesperson quoted saying that he had both sy that he president spokesperson quoted saying that he had both sy that he had ;ident and also think that he had unwavering support for ukraine and is doing all finds a path forward. he finds himself, keir starmer like something new and georgescu, he seems to represent something unknown, perhaps, something new. thank ou for perhaps, something new. thank you for that _ thank you for that. the vatican says the pope had a peaceful night after another breathing crisis in hospital pope francis, who's 88, has been in hospital in rome for two weeks, receiving treatment for double pneumonia. the vatican said his lungs had to be cleared of vomit an

course, that is following his clash with donald trump in the white house last night. >> sir keir starmert for ukraine after us military support for ukraine is now hanging in the balance. following that heated meeting yesterday evening. it resulted in the ukrainian leader dramatically leaving washington. let's take a listen to some of what happened. >> the country is in big trouble. wait a minute. no, no, you've done a lot of talking. your country is in big trouble. >> i know. >> i know. >> you�*re not winning. no, you're not winning this. you have a damn good chance of coming out, okay? because of us. and your men are brave. but they had to use our military. if you didn't have our military equipment. >> you invited. >> you invited. >> you invited. >> you didn't have our military equipment. this war would have been over in two weeks. >> in three days? i heard it from putin in three days. >> mr president, with respect, i think it's disrespectful for you think it�*s disrespectful for you to come into the oval office and try to litigate this in front of the american media. right

starmer just sucked up example. starmerjust sucked up to trump.t want to meet the king. you're so brilliant. i just love your hair. that's 1540 00:07

number 10 says sir keir starmer and volodymyr zelenskyy will meet in downing street this afternoon afterlane today. european leaders have come out in support of their ukrainian counterpart after yesterday and of course, ahead of a major summit in london tomorrow hosted by sir keir starmer. counter—terror police are assessing complaints about a bbc documentary on gaza, which featured the son of a hamas official. the bbc said independent production company hoiho films, which made the documentary gaza how to survive a war zone, told the broadcaster the boy�*s mother had been paid a limited sum of money for the narration. culture secretary lisa nandy met the bbc's chairman yesterday after saying she wanted assurances that no stone will be left unturned dufing stone will be left unturned during a review into the documentary. the bbc has apologised for, quote, serious flaws in the making of the film. elsewhere, the vatican says the pope elsewhere, the vatican says the pope had a peaceful night and now is resting after suffering an isolated breathing crisis. the vatican says pope francis receive

the minister for overseas development, development, anneliese dodds, has resigned over sir keir starmer'se the international aid budget and use it to boost defence spending to 2.5% of gdp. or miss dodds says she disagrees with how it's she disagrees with how it�*s being funded, suggesting in her resignation letter there ought to be a debate about tax and borrowing instead. but rachel reeves has backed the prime minister�*s decision. >> the decision to spend 2.5% of gdp on defence is the right decision. the world has changed. we can see that all around us in europe and beyond. we have to uplift what we spend on defence and we are funded that by reducing the international aid budget, that is the right decision in the circumstances that we face today as a nation. >> and pope francis, who has been critically ill in hospital for two weeks, has had what's been described as an isolated breathing crisis at the vatican, says the pontiff has received non—invasive mechanical ventilation to help him breathe as he continues to battle double pneumonia. a statement from the vatican says. the pope's aler