both elements, by a state, not on behalf of a state by by a state, under 1311 are expressly enumerated in limiting terms in section 1401.a state, under 1311 are expressly enumerated in limiting terms in section 1401. there is no comparable subsidy provided for those enrolled in an exchange established by the federal government under section 1321. so at the end of the day that really is all i should need to say. i could sit down and that's really the end of the discussion. but, that's not the end of the case. the irs, as was stated earlier, has adopted a rule that federal -- that the subsidies apply to both federally run and state run exchanges, even though there's no expressed statutory authorization for that. in fact, quite the opposite. so, what is the plaintiff's claim in these cases. the core claim. that subsidies are provided for state-run exchanges under section 1311 and not for federally-run exchanges under section 1321. there are several rationales. john tlnathan adler around mich canon have put forth scholarly work that the limitation on the subsidies was in fact purposely. wh

the states with the asterisk are medicaid expansion states. and i noted that because it would seem to me they would be most likely to want to try to continue state exchanges. they accepted the medicaid expansion. there would be an enormous political imperative here for the states to have to do something. and the insurance companies would be waiting to see what the states would do because you'd have 283,000 people in north carolina immediately lose their subsidies. the vast majority of those would have to drop their coverage. in florida, 895,000 people would immediately lose their subsidies. this is based on 2014 enrollment. if they double the enrollment in 2015, that would be something approaching 2 million people in florida or 600,000 people in north carolina depending on how many people they enroll in 2015. so it's a huge problem. texas, 580,000, could be a million in 2015 if the obama administration stays on the cbo track for enrollment. that would be an enormous political issue. and what the carriers would be doing is they'd be sitting the

they did it state by state by state. when it came to the end and they did get the right to vote finally in i a few of those states, there was still the question of whether they could vote in national elections. that's why the constitutional amendment was required. i just wanted -- i wanted us not to be talking past each other if you understand? >> yes. democracy might be slow. it has more legitimacy. i don't actually think it's going all that slow in this case. >> right. >> i know the initial process is undertaken now for instance repealed the ohio constitutional amendment. with that, flthere's no other questions. >> i'm fine. thank you mr. murphy. appreciate your help. the case will be submitted. cspan 2015 student cam competition is underway. this competition for high school students will award 150 prizes totaling 100,000. create a three to five minute documentary. it needs to show varying points of view and be submitted by january 20, 2015. go to student cam.org for more information. >>> virginia's democratic senator

simply recording other out-of-state companies to the state is not enough. listen, we are turning away 11 billion tax dollars. those are medicaid tax dollars it would hire nurses, doctors, help rule hospitals. where's the money going? that money is going to other states. nine republican governors for the good of their people above their ideology and their own ideas of self promotion. we should do the same here in south carolina. rural hospitals in the state deserve to be able to say -- they opened. we need to increase the jobs we have across south carolina for going to be successful. >> judge? >> i would like to go back to jobs. i support economic incentives as long as are done responsible. -- responsibly. the governor promised that she would be transparent and accountable, but she has been nothing of the sort. what i would point out to the governor is that there is an old saying, why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free question? >> governor, you've given away the milk, the cow, you've given away the farm when it comes to economic incentives. tran

even in republican states. the economy in florida is a no more lift issomething more for rick scott to run o. but you're seeing cuts to teachers and law enforcement, and it has always been less partisan, but even this time, they're saying, we have to get back to where we are with jocks, and we're running state deficits, so it's a problem. >> without a doubt, the number of the gubernatorial race that's we're seeing, and people are seeing people that might not match their ideology. the races don't get nationalized the way that you would expect. chris christie in new jersey, he's the archetypical candidate here, and in c, in maine, we have governor paula page, one of the most vulnerable governors in the cycle who never pulls above 38%. but because a third power candidate usually splits the vote, he has been able to stay in power. and it will be interesting to see if they want such a conservative tea party governor. >> laura washington, you are sitting in chicago, where pat quinn, if you had asked political pros a

>> state of texas. >> did he have an obligation to be registered under the state of indiana? >> we have to work with the county on that. he doesn't live in hammond so my officers would not have been following him. >> can you tell us about his whereabouts? was he originally from texas? >> i don't know. >> can you tell us -- >> i don't have the information with me. >> chief, can you tell us about the conditions of the bodies when they were found? were they tied up or -- >> i cannot. i cannot. >> also, more exactly, how you tracked him down once you found out that was the person that you were looking for? >> i can only talk about the use of the phone. we got the phone number from the facilitator and we used some electronic measures to track him down and locate him in gary. the classification would be -- the other cases are not solved yet. if we directly attach him to it, we can make that assumption. he's being charged today with the hammond. >> did you voluntarily give you the information? >> yes. >> is he physically going to the sites with you to show you where they are? >> he'

we have different kinds of states. free states and slave states. you have pre-commitments on the basis of where you are. or to take this in terms of modern philosophy, there is no veil of ignorance behind which you can step. so you do not know what your computer condition will - your future condition will be. for all these reasons, madison says constitution making is an imperfect process. it is a very powerful essay. there is nothing like it in the 30 volumes we have on the ratification of the constitution. that is my first point of departure. the second has to do with the passage from federalist 49. federalist 49 and federalist 50. i will summarize this quickly for those who were here this morning and those who are newcomers. so, these two essays. this is a long passage, which i had better read. a very curious part of the federalists where madison does something kind of funny. he's in the process of discussing the separation of powers, how the framers -- what the framers have done will vary from what many americans thought montesquieu had said. ma

harassed oh state university -- harris-stowe state university in st. louis recently hosted a panel discussing whether media ensuing protests, and the national media on a local story, and adversity -- diversity. the panel includes a blogger and the president of black journalist, and this is just under two hours. >> good evening. unfortunately, we need feedback, so we need feedback. so good evening! >> good evening! our faculty,of staff, as students, we would like to welcome you all today. hallis our fifth town meeting that we have sponsored , and i willis-stowe be attending a meeting in the systemicegarding meeting -- systemic problems within a community. we are looking forward to a fruitful dialogue that will go on and continue to has to stomach impacts on -- continue to have systemic impact on our community. we look forward to having a great program. [laughter] [applause] >> good evening everyone's. -- everyone. i am here to actually be a very brief and introduce you to our moderator and get under way. our moderator is mr. bob butler, and he is the pr

that the state, that countries should not intervene in the domestic affairs of other states and that the borders of international affairs began by attempting to have an impact on other societies. and that some kind of international law should be created. and that diplomats should be, should be called into existence as permanent ambassadors in each other's countries. that had never happened before. and so the interesting thing is none of the these people were overwhelming statesmen. but out of a suffering, they instilled a number of principles which then for several hundred years governed european relations and were brought by the europeans and by us around the world. now, some of them are still of great consequence; namely, the basic unit of international relations should be the state and that if you conduct foreign policy on a purely ideological basis and try to undermine the existence of the state, that then the structure of the restraint that could be created disappears. now, of course, we are -- and so nonintervention, principles of conduct, these were useful instruments. the dil

in 1862, only one state a lot of soldier to vote outside of his home state. but by 1964, 19 other northern states had created and passed legislation allowing their soldiers to vote in the field. america had never faced the dilemma of absentee voting. much was uncertain. they did not know how to manage soldier voting. they did not know what effect military voting might have on lincoln's reelection. and they were not sure about how the soldiers felt. the enthusiasm in the war was beginning to wane by late 1863. the peace democrats and the copperheads were campaigning vigorously in a manner described by historian david alan johnson as anti-lincoln. he said "another four years of lincoln in the white house would result in anarchy, tyranny, and negro equality." the effectiveness can be seen in the results or lack thereof of the october state elections in ohio, pennsylvania, and indiana. in ohio, the republicans won. when congress reconvened, ohio democrats now only held two seats. indiana added four republicans to their congressional total. both indiana and pennsy

i'm telling you i'm counting the states. >> the way to count the states i think is through the states that have the democratic processes have adopted that type of change and ip think that -- if you take that number, i think it's -- >> but we've now got 20-something states that see no reason to fuss about this in the legislation because the courts already decided the question. that of course assumes the supreme court is not going to knock it sideways. but, you know, they can count, too. and it is my feeling that they probably do look at the polls. >> maybe the counting point that is somewhere between the two of you is you don't necessarily have to count all the states within a circuit that's ruled one way, particularly if there's going to be abappeal, because that doesn't tell you the bottom line. but you do count the states covered by these circuits where the state attorney general or state governor has decided not appeal because in those states it's over as best i can tell. so maybe that's the relevant number and that's the number around 20, 21, i think. >> i still think it's still t

just as the constitution defines the governmental relationship between the united states and each stateeaties define the relationship between the united states and each of the tribes. like federal constitutional rights, which are known to have a penumbra, they exude a broader meaning than just the words on the page. tribal laws also have greater meaning. they are known as the trust responsibility. this penumbra extends beyond treaties and beyond tribes with treaties to all of the tribes. one is tempted to think that treaties are unimportant, today. their role is the back own of the relationship, the trust responsibility, that continues their importance. that is one of their continued reason for being. one only needs to read the essays in this book to see the importance of treaties. especially in modern times for protecting the rights of indians. it's an inspirational story. i do a lot of thinking about treaties, not just in my current job. into every, i was testifying on behalf of the united states -- in february, i was testifying on behalf of the united states in treaty defense. a dele

but at the same time i don't want a two-state or a unitary state, a binational state but i don't want iran state, a third iranian enclave around israel's border. i think the solution lies in long-term security arrangements that involve israel for a protracted period of time to which the palestinians say you can't do that. that offends our sovereignty. we can't have the presence of security presence or military presence of our former enemy on our soil. that doesn't square with independence. i say really? how about american forces in germany seven years after the fact? or japan or in south korea. no analogy is perfect and identical but the principle in the middle east as we know it where the islamists just rush in, how do we prevent hamas -- >> but those forces were protected germany from the soviet army not occupying germany. >> nobody really -- after you win a war, do you a nagasaki, it's a debatable question how much -- what the local government's decisions are, but the point was there was also an american security consideration and it wasn't merely germany's consideration or japan's

ten slots for in state and ten for out-of-state.converted that to 54 out of state and 24 in state. we also created payments for clinical experiences for midlevel practitioners like physician assistants and a -- nurse practitioners. and particularizing our attraction to rural areas, we created several programs to give medical professionals experience in rural areas like the farm program and rehab program that can students into the area, into the small towns and give them experience in those clinical areas. finally, we added dollars for recruiting incentives so that health care facilities can in santa professionals to come to their area either through giving them a payment or promising them to reimburse their tuition if they stay for an amount of time in a rural area. i am proud we have done a lot. >> moderator: thank you. would you like me to repeat the question? myers: i am ready to go. medicine has become an epidemic. i and indeed it will drive us into a social, political, and financial bankruptcy's. and i put together some of thes

the state and tuition.en >> how many owl ut of state students do you have versus in state? >> we're very unusual in the big ten because our undergraduate education, in terms of out of state students achkd actually we're leaving about 60 -- we felt that we need to be that s c engine of opportunityat that wod class education from michigan residents, particularly if you think about the economy in michigan, so we have stayed true to our mission, but we do need state stinlts because it be p provides aar positive education and stuchbdents to have be parts a global society. >> and foreign students? do you have a figure on that? >> we have about 178 foreign international clients that began back in the 1880s actually with the first student from japan and we began our development work in china and actually in the 1980s with the rice famine and i michigan state had the first dean of international studies in 1957 because people at that time believed that north for michigan to be successful, we had to havr an internationale perspective. >> we're talking with lou anna . simon, she's pres

confrontation states. israel refused to attend the session. the resolution was vetoed by the united states. typically is a double veto. the resolution is not implemented, and the event is vetoed from history, so you have to look hard to find the record, but it is there. that has set the pattern that has continued since. the most recent u.s. veto was in february, 2011, president obama, when his administration vetoed a resolution calling for implementation of official u.s. policy opposition to expansion of settlements and it is worth bearing in mind that expansion of settlements is not really the issue. settlements, unquestionably legal along with the infrastructure projects supporting them. for a long time there has been an overwhelming international consensus in support of a settlement along these general lines. the pattern that was set in january, 1976, continues to the present. israel rejects a settlement of these terms, and for many years, has been devoting extensive resources to ensuring it will not be

the other states that are within the tenth circuit, as well as the states that are within the seventhcuit that ruled in indiana and wisconsin, those federal courts are bound by the decisions of the federal appellate courts so we can probably see same-sex marriages go forward in those states as well. that's how we get from the five states the courts dealt with today, the supreme court, to the 11 states that are likely to allow smearnls going forward. >> ifill: added to that 19 more states who haven't been challenged and they're talking about a majority of the states and district of column. >> 30 states and the district of columbia. >> ifill: we resist reading too much of the tea leaves here but i wonder if you see signs based on your understanding of the way the court operates between what we saw last year of the defense of marriage act and their stepping away at least for now of these cases that the court is, i don't know, paying attention to the popular opinion? >> it may well be that it sees the trend in the lower federal courts that these bans are falling and doesn't see any urgenc

across the nation and you can ascribe whether it is a blue state or red state it is across the board. so is it good public policy? yes. are we doing it in florida? yes. can we improve upon it? yes. there are 17 states that don't offer it at all and i think that can't be lost in talking about how horrible it is in florida. >> i don't want to make joe's life worse. i have permission to ask one more question. it comes back to this question of registration. that is, why not some system of universal registration? why not some system of an opt out registration? that is to say everybody who turns 18 is registered or at least registered in the same way as the questioner asked you might register for the selective service. why is it so difficult if we take that term seriously to register and why so many variations? >> are you saying anybody who is 18? if i became a citizen in 1974 that would have been an unnecessary act on my part? i think we have to have some thresho thresholds. are you saying anybody who is 18 in miami you get to vote and you opt out? >> clearly only if you are eligible to be

first half belonged to ohio state. second half belonged to penn state. we got to play some more football in happy valley. end of regulation. we'll be back after this message and a word from our local abc station. >> brad: captains have already been out at midfield for the toss and ohio state won the toss and chose to defend first. >> referee: you want to go that way? >> we want to play on that side of the field. >> referee: bring it back this way. >> no, no, on offense, we don't care what way we go. >> referee: you're going to put the ball in play, first and ten. >> todd: who's on first? or is that second? >> brad: i don't nope's on third. oh, boy. one thing we know, ohio state's on defense first. penn state's on offense first. it looks like the line of scrimmage is going to be to our right as we view the field starting at the 25 yard line. last time penn state beat a ranked team, little over a year ago, hackenberg, a one-yard touchdown, tied the game at 34-34. michigan missed a 33-yard feel goal. at the end of the third overtime. and belton, the game-wi

the state will be purchasing for 1.3 million people. by 2019 that can eliminate the structural budget deficit we had since bowllet measure 5, and we can actually have structural budgetary increase. that's real money that is general fund dollars and resource that can be pimped right back into the enterprise of education. mo. >> moderator: representative. >> the answer had nothing to do with the question. he says that we are going to have this balanced budget. in the '90s he proposed the oregon healthcare plan. it was way more than expensive than he said and we had to raise taxes. there's a bill dollar hole currently sitting in the 2015-17 budget we have to face next session, and a billion and a half dollar hole in the 2017-19. it's to be determined. because we don't know where the money is coupling from. >> moderator: necessary question. at a february 24th legislative hearing you voiced support requiring background checks for private party gun sales you. called the bill an unreasonable step that shows oregon is being serious about keepin

when you compare us to surrounding state the congressman states that our rate has been worse in our state. our unemployment has come down about four points. the average of all the states around colorado is a 2.2% drop in unemployment. we're outperforming them. certainly in terms of new job creation, entrepreneur, we're four of the top communities for technology startups are in colorado. that's a remarkable achievement for something that supposedly has too many regulations. >> moving on to the next topic for the governor. talk about common core. critics of common core say that the program is too rigid. is a one size fits all education system. and that washington should back off and give states and schools the ability to raise standards on their own. supports of the law say it gives states and schools ample flexibility while ensuring that schools meet the high standards. if you win a second term, would you commit to keeping colorado in common ore? >> well, i don't even call it common core, i call it colorado core. just so we're clear, what common core was 10 years ago, governor, nobody in w

in terms of minorities, in many of swing states in its hispanic its would impact states like coloradond florida, florida race, i believe you know scott -- rick scott has done a good job of reaching out to latino voter, it will be interesting to see what happened in colorado, where gardner had a more difficult time, and a video that came out talking about black voters who are upset with president obama, feeling that democrats have taken them for granted there is more work that republicans need to do with minorities, but this isin something that will be interesting to see. ashley: brad, gop, you know, has a majority in both houses. does anything get done in the remainder of lame duck presidency of barack obama, do we get tax reform, a watered-down version of tax reform, is anything going to happen despite the fact that g.o.p. wins both houses. >> certainly opportunity is there, if there is good faitho both sides, if i were mcconnell on january 4 my first order of business is to invite president obama to the hill to meet with leadership of house, senate and layout a wish list, and then l

from state to state depend on side -- size.k a single federal time i was always hard. i do think though that we've seen real commitment from states about stepping into this. we hear the most from states that are having the hardest time with the. there are a lot of states moving forward in a positive way about how we are evaluating, helping teachers get better. that's the big thing. i really don't care that much about the evaluatio evaluation f his buddy dick your teachers getting better feedback about how they're doing in the classroom. i was hopeful that whole initiative would land in that spot, not the spot where we can use the examples brick used. i don't see the valuations being taken off the table but i do think that states and this is a good have to decide how to do this, not the federal government. >> katherine, your experience in schools and districts as the sort of landscape changes underneath teachers, how do they see -- to they see themselves -- one question, did they see the goalpost then moved on to feel like they'

it was called the best run state in america. cnbc called us the number one state for business. our taxes are among the lowest in the nation. in the political year, it's sometimes hard to remember the good news but it us true. our unemployment restaurant is -- unemployment rate is second lowest in the nation. our student tennessee scores are above -- test scores are above the national average weapon -- above the national average. our communities are among the safeest in our nation and our population and economy are growing faster than the nation. i know that government doesn't deserve credit for most of this, but i worked hard to help south dakota families and businesses achieve success. i'd be grotful for the -- i would be grateful for the opportunity to serve as your governor again. >> mike you have one minute to shower your thought with voters. -- share your thoughts with the voters. >> well, there's something going on out there. a level of anxiety and underlying anger among the people i meet and talk with. and i really believe that we need to respond to that ang -- anger and

and we saw in state after state after state, whether it was texas or pennsylvania or wisconsin, virtuallydentical pieces of legislation being introduced all by a.l.e.c. members. >> and have you found any evidence that points to why, you know, conservative politicians and corporate lobbyists would want to restrict voting? >> well, it's another example of trying to control who can participate in the political process and giving the 1% more power over the political system. just like the citizens united decision. so the idea is we'll make the electorate older, whiter, more conservative, as opposed to younger, more diverse, and more progressive. that way the corporations who are so powerful, they can increase their power over the political process. the more people that vote, the more democratic the political system is, the less power special interests have. the fewer people that participate, the easier it is for special interests to rig the game. >> is there a connection between the citizens united decision, which opened the floodgates, as everyone says, to campaign contributions from wealthy

states rejected obamacare. several came up with using those federal dollars to use their own federal system -- their own system. taxes turning its back on federal money. would you be willing to negotiate with the federal government on a plan that lowers premiums as well as reduces the local tax burden or would you refuse to talk to washington and make a deal? what i think is the best strategy for the state of texas would be for the state of texas to be able to get a grant or we would have the level of flexibility so we could address the unique health care challenges the people of the state of texas face. these bureaucrats in washington, they do not know how to address our health care problems. >> i hate to cut you off. conservatives they block grants are not a practical solution. >> they have been used effectively in states like rhode island and indiana and i think they can be used now. which laid out strategies i will improve health care spending on areas where we can improve people's lives. i want to increase

they targeted the gulf state.they clearly made the operation of a saudi arabia to yemen to reinvent and get their act together come to be able to launch whatever they can against saudi arabia and the rest of the gulf countries. why did we participate on the coalition? i think it's a very important question. number one, there was a legitimacy without saudi arabia and the rest of the gulf countries but has been. we had to come out clearly same five things that daish is not part of islam from what they're doing is wrong, they deserve to be fought and taken all the necessary action. saudi arabia participating legitimacy to this coalition that for the first time in history you have this huge number of countries acting from working together, fighting and nonstate actor there was greeted as a result of an unfinished job, as a result of a sectarian government that is taking a side and create a political platform or a platform that allow such a thing to grow there. so the second point on, what happened in mosul. it was a b

it is a state in which the democratic party, i think, controls the state like 4-1. in kansas, which passed the voter id law, a majority of democrats in the house and senate voted in favor of the law. this is simply an effort to make sure that the system we have is one that is secure, that is free and fair, and it is not going to keep people who are eligible from voting from being able to vote. thanks. >> thank you. we are about eight minutes ahead of time when we normally ask for questions so i would like to use my prerogative and sk if each of our speakers but like to give a two to three minute response to what they have heard this morning. if we can keep it to two to three minutes and we will start the questions promptly. ms. ifill? >> do we have a press conference ahead of time? >> we usually allow a half hour for questions. i thought since we have a newsmaker -- instead of having one speaker instead of two, i thought it was a good practice to do it for two distinguished lawyers. >> i appreciate it. where do i begin? i think what you just heard really in many way

when they transition out into a state -- into states. so i think you can beef this issue up a whole lot more than what i'm hearing. >> linda, those efforts are actually already under way. the federal bureau of prisons has just instigated a requirement for a standardized release in terms of doing substance use disorder evaluation. i think we're starting to see that kind of process come down. on the medicaid expansion side, i think the data that i gave you from washington state speaks very loudly to how there's a direct relationship between health care spending, recidivism, and criminal justice spending. so i don't think it's because of a lack of data that we haven't been able to make that push. i think, again, we have to realize that public health and public safety are intertwined and interconnected, and it does not serve anyone's interest let alone the taxpayer to keep folks isolated on an island without the appropriate regulatory framework that we come to expect as part of our federal state and local partnership. so what i would say is

the michigan state takes over on downs. they're still out there talking they're still out there talking about things. twork, it isg by te second. it's crazy, huh? and people are relying on it more than ever. we cover more than 99% of all americans. i know, i can't imagine living without it. it's a place where people can come share knowledge and ideas. it's beautiful. that's deep charlie. my selfie just hit a hundred likes...(gasps) a hundred! at&t is building you a better network. only a bu[sfx] bongproved this?, allcravings menu.ck. alright, let's see that okay,flea flicker. down. what's this? aflac. show me that double wing formation. aflac! doesn't really know football, does he? no, but when i got hurt, he paid my claim in only four days. four days? wow! okay, last chance, the play action. okay, forget it. aflac. an official partner of the heisman trophy. all around the world the dedicated people of united airlines ♪ are there to support you. ♪ that's got your back friendly. ♪ the most amazing thing about the ford fusion

here in the united states are extremely low. been taking necessary precautions including working with countries in west africa to increase screening at airports so that someone with the virus doesn't get on a plane for the united states. >> as we all know now that didn't quite work out. that was president obama speaking for the cdc headquarters a few weeks back before the u.s. received its first case of ebola. now, thomas kun duncan is fighting for his life and receiving treatment from a new experimental drug that supplies for zmap have run out. earlier this afternoon president obama announced that the u.s. is preparing additional measures to screen passengers in the u.s. casey has that story. >> whether thomas duncan frankly lives or dies could all be hinging on this experimental drug he is now receiving here at texas health presbyterian hospital in dallas. a drug by the way that has never been tested in humans or in animals for its effectiveness against the ebola virus. it has been tested in humans for other diseases. it's pri

this is about our state's future. that is why i am hope you will be for bruce, too. >> this is michelle obama and i know pat quinn. i have seen that pat has the kurds to do what is right. now pat is fighting to raise minimum wage. he is creating jobs here at home instead of shipping jobs overseas. he will never cut funding for military families or veterans to give tax breaks to the wealthy. election, barack and i are casting our votes for our friend pat quinn. c-span's campaign 2014 is bringing you 100 debates for control of congress. follow us on twitter and like this on facebook. >> on the next "washington discussesdiana oakley how prepared americans are to potentially outlive their america -- their retirement savings. then mickey mcintyre looks at the death with dignity laws in place across the u.s.. this comes at the decision of a 29-year-old two and her life -- to end her life after being diagnosed with terminal brain cancer. wilson centerthe hosted a discussion on oil prices. energy experts will look at the fx a

seven of the republican seats and no n obama states emocratic states are up in romney states. second, because as neil alluded, is a presidential election so instead of midterm where there thumb on the scale for republicans, it is not on there for republicans. republicans really, really, eally need to not only win a majority this time but if they can put an extra seat or two on they might find hat hadn'ty if they have -- handy if they have as ugly a isr in 2016 in the senate as possible. but the nightmare scenario for this.icans is their party was so, so pumped up optimistic about 2012, both in terms of the presidential ace and winning a majority of the senate. so they were bitterly disappointed. out of it wondering was our t lied to or money not well spent. i'm talking about macro, top to bottom. as a result, there hasn't been goi -- money moan going into republican committees super p.a.c.'s because the on r community is so down the republican side. we had a strategist who said if it were not the koch brothers we blown away financially. they are keeping republicans in the game

we've asked that state's secretary of state and his answer is next. just tell us your budget and the "name your price" tool helps you find a whole range of coverages. no one else gives you options like that. [voice echoing] no one at all! no one at all! no one. wake up! [gasp] oh! you okay, buddy? i just had a dream that progressive had this thing called... the "name your price" tool... it isn't a dream, is it? nope. sorry! you know that thing freaks me out. he can hear you. he didn't mean that, kevin. kevin: yes, he did! keeping our competitors up at night. now, that's progressive. even though early voting started early there yesterday, georgians still don't know who's eligible to vote. tens of thousands of voter registration applications submitted by the new georgia project appear to be lost in the system. and they're suing to make sure those georgians can still cast a vote. brian kemp is currently investigating the georgia project over accusations of alleged voter registration fraud. "all in" reached out to ask for comment on the lawsuit. >> as we

if two of the 50 states of the united states of america have chosen to walk down that road. so i think that's the end of an answer of the profound impact of the changes, changes in the united states already having on the debate. so a couple other housekeeping issues. you are welcome to join this conversation on twitter, #bimj, and without further ado, wells. >> john, let me begin by expressing my gratitude to be a part of this panel. i'm really glad to see all of you be taking part in the discussion. weekly, i just wanted to essentially say two things. one, set out some of the international legal contexts as it applies to the united states. involving experiment with marijuana, including the united states argument as to why it is in compliance with the international drug policy. and just for ever briefly under we'll get into this in the discussion in the q&a, talk about the upside and downside of the u.s. approach. the legal setting. it is almost certainly not new to people is room that it applies to three accords to which the nazis as a party, one than in 1961 and amended in

in the united states had more than 15% of its people obese and now there is not a single state in the united states that doesn't have an obesity record among 15%. poor, high gun crimes, accidents, obesity, all of these things and the size of the country, the united states, 320 million americans, there are almost as many people in that survey, the americans are equal to the 10 other countries combined. >> i don't know what the point is but to say americans haven't had sufficient access to quality american healthcare, many don't have access to affordable, nutritional food, there are a lot of things wrong in this country. it works great for the top 2%, top 10% and the affordable care act is evening out a lot of this. it will take time. people now can see doctors and get preventive care. there are no co-payments. >> there are major issues. if you look at the price treatment point, lack of competition, duplicate medical expenses, lack of competition between hospitals, the suspect is not working as it shoot. >> putin will squeeze ukraine this pall? >> we will try but the west will hang toug

state? >> thank you for having us here, and i want to thank the main state chamber as well for hosting the event. as most of you know, i am not the most entertaining orator. i am more of a listener. the reason that i will make a great governor is that i have a mission, i have experience working in the legislature and in the senate, and the 12 years in congress. i know how to bring people together. if we are going to solve problems here, whether working with the legislature, republicans and democrats and independents. or whether it is working with special interest groups, we were able to get the issue solved in the legislature. so i would be a better governor. >> i would just like to say that, in the last 12 years as a congressman, you have voted 93% the way nancy pelosi in the democratic leaders have asked you to vote. that is not working both ways. if you look at what is happening in maine, as much as you say that i do not work with others, two thirds of the bills that went into law, your p

we're going state by state. there's nothing reinforcing the state to stay in the common core. always get chastised when i say something about the adoption of standards. but there's not nothing preventing states from rewriting the common core and doing what they want to do with it. i think this narrative about what is in the standard and what is not, of course we want kids to do well. it doesn't mean that they can read epa manuals at the same time. we want kids to be reading a lot of books and have higher education standards and i don't disagree with the goals that we are trying to accomplish. and there hasn't been a process with the massive amount of input that we had to write this. i think that we have written a better set of standards in any state has had. and i think that we disagree about that. >> another issue, and catherine touched about this. for those on the right side of the political spectrum, one attractive feature is the idea of a nationwide marketplace for instructional materials rather than just having a textbook market. they might be able to access this and so c

we know the up-tempo of the islamic state. we know what they have stated. they have stated unequivocally by their leader -- in january he made this quote, "we will be in direct contact with you soon," meaning the united states. "we are with you. we are watching you. we are with you." just recently again in the last month or so he made another comment to the united states along the same lines, that they intend to have activity in the united states. no one thought they would be able to get into baghdad. today mortars are going into western baghdad. the question is will back that fall?- will baghdad i think when a man man speaks, you listen. we need to take the threat from the islamic state seriously, i recognize that we could see violent activity here in this nation as well. that is why on every level we need to secure our borders. i am sorry to say -- i don't believe that our government is fully securing our borders today. in fact, i know they aren't. not on the southern border through illegal immigration, but certainly not from legal immigration, when an am

kentucky has been a red state for a while now, and it's a red state that has gotten redder and redderuring the president obama presidency. if you look at his approval rating in kentucky right now it sits at just 31%, and that's ten points worse than he is doing natalionall nationally. all of that is worth keeping in mind as you watch this. >> did you vote for president obama 2008, 2012? >> you know, this election is not about the president. it's about making sure you put kentuckians back to work. >> did you vote for him? >> i was a delegate for hillary clinton, and i am a clinton tkepl through and through. >> so you are not going to answer? >> again, i don't think the president is on the ballot as much as mitch mcconnell might want him to be, it's my name. >> that's alison grimes, the democratic candidate for senate in kentucky, and that was add a editorial board meeting on thursday, and she has a real chance of winning that race, after all, mcconnell is not that popular in kentucky so he is vulnerable in this case and it's a close race right now, but the entire mcconnell strategy is

to other states. i don't care if the idea comes from a republican or democrat. if it helps south carolina, i'm for it. i didn't support things in the affordable care act like the of -- individual mandate but i support keeping our tax dollars here. , our hospital is slated to close down in a few months because governor haley is blocking their own medicaid tax dollars. governor haley is putting her own political career above the good of the communities. mothers, fathers, except for staying here in south carolina. >> rural hospitals are not closing down because of medicaid not being accepted. populations are choosing to drive to get to more modern facilities. we have done more than any administration. we pay 100% of all medicaid patients and we started the transformation program that would allow them to have urgent care facilities where they treat chronic disease and help with emergency room issues and partner with larger issues. >> ladies and gentlemen, our -- if you read this date, so many other news o

any state in the nation. thatould we make investment if we are cutting education? it is to reinforcement. we are doing better in michigan. we are at 70%. we need to get that number high. that is what i want to work on in a second term. education some other issues to get to. i don't think you will ever agree on that billion dollar cut. beener schools have another area of contention of the last several months. you feel charter schools need more rigid regulation? >> the first thing i would do as governor is put the money back. it is irrefutable. you can check the sources. there are less dollars in the classroom. there are less dollars to educate our kids than before he became governor. another problem hurting our schools, school district over the state, 48 school districts that are in deficit. there will be more. they went broke. were allowed to expand with no oversight. that was a big mistake by this governor. it is hurting our kids. the free press did in a day toies on what has happened our public schools. 80%

that the state, countries should not -- the domestic affairs of other states. and the borders of the international affairs, by attempting to have an impact on other societies. some kind of international laws have been created. diplomats should be called into existence, they never happened before. and so the interesting thing is none of the people, overwhelming statesman. but out of -- still a number of principles which for several hundred years governed european relations and were brought by the europeans and buy us and the world's. some of them are still of consequence. namely the basic unit of international is asian should be the state aid if you conduct foreign policy on a purely ideological basis and try to undermine the existence of the state, then the structure of restraint that could be created disappears. now, of course, non intervention, separate principles of conduct, these were useful instruments. the dilemma of the present period is that several things are happening simultaneously. the state as a political organization is attacked in many parts of t

because their aim is not to have a palestinian state of '67 lines, but to destruct the jewish state. this is the idea. that's why you don't say even two states for two peoples. it denies the existence of the jewish people. >> rose: you believe that is the position of abbas. >> absolutely. can you quote him saying that israeli to recognize the right to exist as a station as a jewish people or to consider the compromise as the end of -- >> you can you can quote him saying it. than he is a tricky way of abbas. >> rose: let me ask you this. at camp david when barak was negotiating, was a recognition of a jewish state part of the negotiations? >> no, no. >> rose: no but you added that later. >> no, we didn't add it later. rabin tried to put it in oslo. and he failed. so his condition to agree to oslo was to get a side letter from arafat in which arafat was committed to change the palestinian charter in a way that would be recognition of israel as a jewish state. and he didn't do it. he didn't do it. why didn't he do it. >> rose: arafat didn't do. >> arafat didn't do it. >> rose: he did it

some are in my state and some in joe's state.is something we have to go hard on. >> but you can't jeopardize the reliability of the grid system. people are relying on the system. the most vulnerable are the elderly and the poor. we want to keep the system affordable, dependable and reliable and working in a balance between the economy and environment and i'm telling you we can do it. >> so when is the trip to west virginia for both of you gentlemen? >> we've got that about three weeks from now? >> about three weeks. we have a good tour for him. we have more wind farms east of the mississippi than any other state. >> i want to go. >> i took him out on a fishing boat. >> come with us, ed. >> and we went trawling. we pulled the fish up with a trawl. he was like a sailor out there. >> and we want you to come to the coal mine and the coal plant, a wind farm. a hydro. we'll do it all. >> i appreciate it. senators thanks for working together on this. sheldon whitehouse and joe manchin. thank you very much. >>> building a community. fait

commerce across state borders. we had the european union a long time before they had the european union. in any case, what the united states did, is that it showed that there were certain kinds of pipe dreams that you could actually realize, and as was said by a french observer at the time, francois bourgeois, and he was the diplomat for france who arranged the louisiana purchase, and he came back to see america in 1830 and he marveled at it. he said, "i saw a former president walking along the sidewalk." he thought that was the most amazing thing and he said the government of the united states has no model in ancient or modern times. so the united states demonstrated possibilities, much as magellan demonstrated that the world wasn't flat. magellan didn't make the world round. he simply circumnavigated it. so my book argues that there were three, in a way, generic principles that were a part of what happened, and i call these access, arbitration, and transparency. i think it's better than life, liberty, and the pur

in those five states, and over the course of the next few days in six other states where those courts have jurisdiction as well, gay marriage will be legal. once again, though, there is something weird an the losing side. so there are nine supreme court justices. do the math. if you want to win a case at the supreme court you need five votes. you need five justices on your side. you need five votes to win a case. but it only takes four votes for the supreme court to decide to take a case in the first place. so we know there are four anti-gay marriage justices an the supreme court. scalia, roberts, alito and thomas. if they wanted to hear one of these cases today if they wanted the chance to overturn one of those pro-gay marriage cases from the lower courts, those four justices had enough votes to take the case to do it. the anti-gay marriage side could have taken one of those cases. why didn't they? it's a consequential decision. instead of 19 states and the district of columbia recognizing gay marriage, which was true before the open of business today, by this time next week it's pro