he was connected to steve bannon. he's a friend of steve bannon's. so maybe it's a normal thing that this investor guy and his firm is like hey i need you to hook me up with bannon yes technically from the rules of logic but step back for a second as i citizen this is crazy, right? this is a lawsuit about qatari guys not coughing up their investment for aged players and now offering money to make steve bannon their paid agent after he has been fired from the white house. what? yeah. this is real. this is our life now. you're not asleep. back to the transcript, quote -- o i have no idea about michael flynn and your money. but at this point, the story is still absolutely worth ignoring, right. maybe this is a fascinating wacky off shoot of the plucky story of the three-on-three basketball league that could. right. without casting aspersions on any of the people involved this is a civil lawsuit file in california in a showbiz sports world case by a guy that once had business connections to steve bannon. no reason to think this is anything other than a w

he stated to me he wanted me to convey a message from the qatari government to steve bannon. uested i set up a meeting between him, the qatari government, and mr. bannon to say qatar would underwrite all of his political efforts in return for his support. now this guy, who helped found this basketball league, had a previous business relationship with steve bannon. maybe it's a normal thing, hey, i need to you hook me up with bannon. yes, technically, by the rules of logic. step back from this as a citizen. this is crazy pants, right? this is a lawsuit about qatari guys not coughing up their full promised investment in ice cube's basketball league for aged nba players and in this lawsuit now the qatari government is offering money to make steve bannon their paid agent after he's been fired from the white house? what? yes, this is real. this is our life now. you're not asleep. back to the transcript. i immediately let mr. al-rumaihi know i was against this. quote, i was appalled. mr. al-rumaihi laughed and then stated to me that i should not be so naive, that so many washington

steve bannon, thank you. thank you for having me. steve bannon there.bbc investigation learned of allegations that donald trump's lawyer, michael cohen, was paid by ukraine to arrange talks between the country's president and president trump. bbc journalist paul wood broke the story earlier — he's spoken to sources who claim ukraine's petro poroshenko arranged to pay cohen at least $100,000 to help make sure the meeting, which took place at the white house injune, was more than a brief photo op. cohen and the ukranian government have denied the allegations. pauljoins us now from the white house. explain what you found? the meeting was agreed through official channels but president petro poroshenko needed something he could portray as proper talks, something substantive. you have to look at what happened in the election. details were leaked from a ukrainian investigation into paul manafort, trump's campaign manager. he denies the allegations, of having millions of dollars from a pro—russian party in the ukraine. sources in kieft told us that petro porosh

who listens to steve bannon? does the president was into steve bannon -- listen to steve bannon? is a good question. i pressed him on that. who is he in touch with on the administration. he would not say directly. he said that he would did not want to comment on who he is in touch with in the trump administration. it is clear that he is pushing for trump to take a tough position, both on china and the trade war, and with special counsel robert mueller, where he advocated that trump did not need to sit down for an interview with robert mueller, that it was unnecessary. that he can answer those questions in writing. francine: you have been following the trump administration since the very beginning. what did you learn in this interview? >> i learned that obviously there are divisions within trump's inner circle. steve bannon is a prime example of that. he is from the hard-line in the administration. he criticized treasury secretary steven mnuchin for agreeing to hold off on these tariffs, saying that china -- that we are already in economic warfare with china, they are not backing

steve bannon isn't buying it.-blank what his plans are in the short-term and he told me that he has a series of species -- because he's going to be giving in europe this week and then from there, he sort of traveled to italy where he will meet with the far right leader of a populace that conservative movement that steve bannon back. i also asked him when the last time you spoke to president trump was and he didn't answer. beginning to compete for the prime minister job, interestingly. if steve bannon thinks that president trump had china on the back foot and china was just about to give in, did he detail what exactly china would have done? kevin: steve bannon's sake, he went on to say that president trump had forced the chinese to move with a sense of urgency, something they have never done, but now, politically, for mr. bannon's perspective, from his perspective, president trump has to deliver building the wall along the wall along u.s. mexico border and manufacturing jobs, so the steve bannon pushed back against

when steve bannon uses the term culture war uses that term pointedly. they were seeking out companies that could build an arsenal of informational weapons to fight that war. that is why they went through a british military contractor that specialized in information operations. i have some questions on the record especially state security services. sen. grassley: let me announce that the record stays open for a week. if you folks get written questions from people that are here, for people that don't come, we would appreciate if you would answer them and get them back to us as soon as you can. senator leahy? -- lee? >> thank you. while you fault cambridge analytica for using its data that it obtained without authorization, at the same time you took that same data with you upon leaving the company. isn't that right? mr. wylie: because there were no staff at cambridge analytica, most people were contractors or had companies. i received a copy of the data. sen. lee: you had that data and you started your own company. mr. wylie: my company was in existence be

how can steve bannon get it so wrong? before about lack unemployment during the in history and mind you, and it's only been measured for about 50 or 60 yea rs, been measured for about 50 or 60 years, and it was trending downward throughout much of barack obama's presidency. the trajectory of black unemployment was dropping for years now before donald trump became president. reached its lowest point and has taped up a little bit. steve bannon was hanging his hat purely on the unemployment number would obviously bernice king was referencing his other rhetoric and questioning whether you have to analyse whether her father would support donald trump based more on just on employment. he had to consider rhetoric as well as larger policies. not surprisingly she pushed back very protective of her, martin luther king's legacy when it comes from someone martin luther king's legacy when it comes from someone like steve bannon. thank you for putting it into perspective for us. there in washington. staying with donald trump — there ar

>>> steve bannon blasting intelligence insiders as he weighs in on mr. trump's debunked spy conspiracies. stand by to hear from bannon in a new interview. >>> kim jong-un's ex-spy enforcer is headed to washington to deliver a letter. is the summit back on. vile and vicious. the white house condemns a vulgar remark about ivanka trump, samantha bee is apologizing. is there comparison on the president's daughter and racist tweets that got roseanne barr fired? we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in the situation room. new york's top law enforcement official accuses trump of using pardon power to thwart justice rather than advance it. issuing another pardon to a conservative author and filmmaker, and floating the pablt that he will pardon other high profile convicted felons, including martha stewart. i will get reaction from the houd judiciary committee ted lieu. and correspondents and analysts are standing by. let's go to jim acosta. the president has shown he is granting pardons early and to do

that is a question better put to steve bannon.in terms of the dangers for not just american democracy, but other democracies around the world, this data is powerful and if it is put into the wrong hands, it becomes a weapon. we have to understand that companies like facebook and platforms like facebook or twitter are not just social networking sites. they are opportunities for information warfare. not just by state actors, but also nonstate actors. we really do have to look at protecting cyberspace as a national security issue, in the same way we have agencies to protect our borders, land and sea. thank you very much -- sen. coons: thank you very much, mr. wylie. >> thank you, mr. chairman, and welcome to each of the witnesses. thank you for being here. i think americans are rightly concerned about privacy and the security of our data. we are also concerned about the power that is being collected in silicon valley, a handful of companies having enormous troves of data they are able to use and employ with very few rules governing w

that is a question better put to steve bannon. forerms of the dangers democracies around the world, this data is powerful and if it is put into the wrong hands and becomes a weapon. thatve to understand companies like facebook and platforms like facebook or twitter are not just social networking sites. they are opportunities for information warfare. we really do have to look at aotecting cyberspace as national security issue, in the same way that we have agencies to protect our borders. >> accuray much. -- thank you very much. >> welcome to each of the witnesses. think americans are rightly concerned about privacy and the security of our data. we are also concerned about the power that is being collected in silicon valley by a marvelous -- having an honest's tropes of data that they are able to use with very few rules governing what they do is it. much of the media attention in recent weeks has been focused on the data operation of the trump campaign manager they were hardly the first -- trump campaign. they were hardly the first.

the question is how many votes doesn't steve bannon have, the answer -- does steve bannon have, zero. and the voters will give donald trump latitude in how he goes about thanks. could the office adjusted there is a prospect of opening of china's markets more to financial services, companies like blackrock infidelity international have been eager to get into china and with this equities markets there. so that could be another piece of the puzzle that is he a to be fit in. betty: beijing has played a major role in the possible summit upcoming between kim jong-un and president trump, so is that playing into the trade talks? joe: donald trump himself suggested it might well be, because he said that president xi had enough leverage over kim jong-un to, if things were not going his way on trade, he could encourage or influence kim to take a harder line in some of the set of talks for the summit. that is at least the sign about the same time as the u.s. was approaching the idea of tariffs on chinese goods, that the north koreans started a more harsh rhetoric than they had before. now we will

crazy if i could get my two cents in, i completely agree with steve bannon.liani was the best decision that could possibly have been made. he is wage attorney-client privilege, he lies all the time, he seems slightly manic. he's the best thing we've ever had. thank you, donald trump, for putting in rudy giuliani. second, fax or stubborn things. steve is absolutely right that there are 44 lines of questions. leaked outw that got by various friends who got that story for only a couple of people in the room, but the truth is -- steve: i cannot believe you bring up leaks. anything that goes on in the special prosecutor's office is immediately written up, or i should say typed up in the new york times. lanny: we had a hard time with leaks at the clinton white house, so i'm sympathetic. but my point is that truth and facts are stubborn, no matter or anyone elsemp does. the truth and facts are going to prevail, and that's what mr. mueller has going for him. year, andhas been a i'm saying just go back to the 44 questions. that's where we know at least in some officia

>> sean hannity is the new steve bannon, and that is accurate. steve bannon is gone.ity fills this void for donald trump, and the important thing about this is that this is the president of the united states who is listening to somebody who represents the echo chamber of the base, not somebody who represents the very hard conflict of opinion within the united states. our founders empowered a cabinet, and if you look back through history, we looked at the department of state and war and treasury as those who gave trusted advice to the president of the united states. in this case sean hannity is somebody giving advice. and mind you, brian, this is sean hannity who once said, i am not a journalist jackass. now, there was no punctuation in that, but he was espousing is he's not even a fair minded jftd in his own words. he is an opinion talk show host who is feeding that opinion to the president of the united states and making him feel good before he goes to bed at night. >> some of those public servants you just mentioned, this quote that's in the article, trump in -- wha

vonnie: that was steve bannon speaking it -- speaking with stephanie baker. outh korea's president moon very shortly. we are joined by kevin cirilli who is live on capitol hill. banningcomment about first. -- bannon first. you spoke with him yesterday. absolutely. steve bannon criticizing the administration for lifting those restrictions on zte. just within the last hour, some interesting developments here on capitol hill pertaining to zte. secretary mnuchin testifying in the senate that it was not a "great quote quote --quid pro quo for lifting those restrictions. speculation mounting for democrats and republicans and senator chris van hollen introducing an amendment in the senate that actually cleared by a vote of 23-2 that would limit president trump's ability to lift those trade restrictions against zte. i'm told by separate sources of the commerce committee led by wilbur ross would be able to still pursue lifting those trade restrictions against zte. all of this comes a south korean president moon is said to be at the white house i had of the summit with

eth was the now familiar "witchhunt," and the new phrase ygate, and of course, no collusio but steve bannon tghd "bbc news the mueller ruptured go ahead. steve: i'm in the middle of the mueller investigation. one of the very first thing he wants to know is her --th your conversations he president. reporter: do you think mueller should be fired? steve: i do not think mueller should be fired. inb mueller is an honorable guy. he is a combat m he served his country. i don't agree with everything going on with the special counsel, but i think he has run it -- reporterdo you think donald trump should testify? steve: i do not think the esident should testify. i don't think it rises to the level. he can answer those questions in writing. i think he ought to answer the questions. reporter: when the president assumes a position of being above the law -- st.e: he is not above the l i said he should ask the -- answer the questions in writing.: ja steve bannon talking to " bbc news night." ick look at the other ne now. yulia skripal, poisoned with a nerve agent in the city of salisbury, along with their

>> he was very close with steve bannon. steve bannon came in in august of 2016 and then obviously during the opening through the transition and the opening months of the white house, he had that very close line with steve bannon. it was erik prince's plan along with bannon to draft a private military force to take over our role in afghanistan. he wanted to pull out u.s. american troops and replace that with contractors. the trump white house and general mattis did not go with that plan. he was front and center in our foreign policy discussions. >> last question to you, guy. you've got a number of these characters cooperating with, answering questions from the special counsel. i asked danny about the johnsge trajectory of this. what does that tell you about where this investigation stands? >> well, they are trying and if you listen to, david, the mayor, mayor giuliani, they are having discussions, detailed discussions, about the president's interview. and not just who's going to be president, what's the scope of it, how long

china is the one thing that steve bannon was right about. really -- they had so many different trade barriers, the u.s. does get a bad deal on it, but the chinese are not going to -- they are not going to give away anything easily. but trump is right. read these things about foreign policy, about the europeans, them really standing up to trump. no they aren't. they are not going to stand up to trump. they will find a way to deal with him. a --uropeans have done what have they done? i don't want to get them too much credit. >> john? >> in terms of policy i think the republican party has changed trump more than trump has changed the party. look to theto future, immigration, seeing it how that is set aside by someone heterodoxy, i think the long-term question is -- is there a coalition of voters? you are need to read this issue of the weekly standard. typically, trump, his supporters over 65 say that we lost that character fight with bill clinton, focus on policy and voters under the age of 40 are pretty appalled by the erratic temperament and

phonewas an exclusive conversation with steve bannon earlier today. urprise that he is slightly annoyed. >> putting it nicely that he is slightly annoyed. vanden went all out against the -- bannon went all out against brokered byruce steven mnuchin in and he said s -- steven mnuchin anha c bennett took issue with the lifting -- steve bannon took issues with the lifting of sanctions on zte. he still plays depends on who you ask. ,ext week, he will be in italy meeting with the far-rights ultra-conservative leader. he didn't answer when i asked him about the last time he spoke with trump. >> you once where i want to go, his contact with trump. contact the u.s. trade representative? in contact with the political orbit outside the white house, but he would not say who read talks to inside of the white house. we should note that steve bannon nunberg,g stone going after the fbi. i can tell you that sanders released a statement that said with ronp met rosenstein and, as a result of that meeting, john kelly will meet with lawmakers on capitol hill and others in

i know steve bannon said on some of that stuff.for example, the book says the remarks that trump made at the new jersey golf club which were about charlottesville that steve bannon thought he could be removed under the 20th amendment because of mental impairment. i was interviewing bannon at that time of the controversy when trump was in new jersey and he said he talked to him twice on the phone and edged him on. it was wonderful and he said to retract it, if you do the press will jump on you. a lot of other items are just obviously untrue. just unbelievable. you saw how overjoyed she was and how overjoyed trump was but there's just silly stuff but some people just want to believe these things and they can't figure out the difference between truth and falsehood. >> in your book you talk about how president trump talks to the mainstream generalists, the new york times and the washington post, there's a lot of reaching out to people who don't have the best interest in mind. what you think about all that? >> on one hand trump recogniz

. >> brennan: is steve bannon still cop counseling the president? >> i asked the president, we had long ranging conversation when he called me yesterday he said that report is not true. he said he has not talked to mr. bannon in many months. he has seen headline that was made aware of it just happened to mention that to me. >> brennan: the president said he was very much like to speak to robert mueller. guiliani said he would be a fool to do so. will he speak with him? >> many people say that it wouldn't be necessary for the president to do so based on what they see and what they know. i would note for you that really fascinating curious development that happened friday came from the federal district judge in eastern district of virginia who is residing over the manafort case. if you read the full exchange, pretty remarkable, margaret where you have not somebody from the white house, not a politics, no one who is, quote, team trump somewhere talking about the mueller. federal district judge saying to mueller's team, have you burned through $10 milli

comments from the steve bannon speaking to bloomberg in prague. we will play out what mr. say throughout the morning, and more insights into his thinking. mr. mnuchin is talking about the trade war being on hold. issues remain. he was alluding to those in that interview. let's talk about the stock stories we are much it -- we are watching. nejra: let's start with the movers we see in a telecom sector. the french telecoms regulator is more open to mergers. see iliad jumping. the real move has been in since, up 35%, the most january, 2014. volkswagen, the best performing up 0.7% after china has said to be cutting import duties on cars to 50% from money 15% from 25%.to yields a their highest in years. paul, people talk about key points, key inflection points for bull markets. i think we are seeing a glacial drift move higher in yield when it comes to the u.s.. sense if youkes think the fed will continue to normalize policy. you would expect to see higher yields across the bonds curve over time, pushed up by the front end. where getting to levels investors and analysts, people

president listening to outside advisers on his fight with the doj, because as i read in the open here, steve bannon, his former campaign manager, corey lewandowski, david bossie and the president of the hispanic council, cnn commentator, steve cortes. they are going about this campaign to try to undermine the investigation and to, i believe they don't think that john kelly is forcefully enough representing the president or pushing back on this investigation. >> yeah, i mean i think we've seen a lot of frustration from the president allies outside of the white house in particular who may feel the ability to voice their feelings more loudly than they would have when they were in the white house or in a official capacity that trump and the white house are not taking a strong enough line when it comes to this investigation, and particularly when it comes to rod rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, and they seem to want the take aim at him, at rosenstein as part of this deep state conspiracy that's trying to undermine the president and undermine his victory. >> so what's their role? >> the thing her

most of that is just fiction and i know steve bannon sent that stuff.the book shelves that when the, when the remarks that trump made at the new jersey golf club. which were about charlottesville. that steve bannon thought he could be removed into the 25th amendment because of mental impairment. i was interviewing bannon at that time in the middle of the controversy. when trump was in new jersey and he said he talked to him twice on the phone and him on. he said it was wonderful what he was saying, don't retract and if you do the press will jump on you so this is one little example and a lot of other items that are obviously untrue. trump never wanted to run. that they were unhappy that they ran. she was in tears when they won. unbelievable.you saw how all those words he was and how overjoyed trump was so it's just silly but some people want to believe that these things, they can't figure out the difference between truth and falsehood. but that's fine. when you elected to cooperate with them, he writes for these liberal publications like vanity fair. wh

and president trump's former right—hand—man steve bannon upsets martin luther king's daughter who sendsall the details.

jeff quatenets who is a friend of steve bannon and who is now suing mr. al rumaihi said mr.i requested i set up a meeting between him and the qatari government and steve bannon and to tell steve bannon that qatar would underwrite all of his political efforts in return for his support. he rejected the offer in response. al rumaihi laughed and then stated to me that i shouldn't be naive, that so many washington politicians take our money and stated do you think flynn turned down our money? tonight the daily mail is reporting new information about that meeting in trump tower on december 12th. if true and if the special prosecutor can substantiate this information, then michael cohen is in much, much more trouble than we have previously known. the daily mail quotes a single unnamed kuwaiti source. the kuwaiti source told daily mail that al rumaihi called him and boasted that cohen had asked him for money in exchange for influence in the trump administration. the official said, he said cohen told him to send millions to various members of the trump family. al rumaihi did not do s

i want to read you a quote from steve bannon.e is saying about the mid-term elections you have to make it up or down vote november 6. you want trump on the ticket in every district. you have to put trump on the ticket. you are not voting for congress. you are voting for donald trump. this is something that presidents in first midterm try to distance themselves to say this is not a referendum on the president. this is a referendum on congress. but bannon is suggesting the exact opposite. good strategy or no? >> i assume comments like that is why steve bannon is making the phone call from an indies closed location -- undisclosed location deep in the political wilderness. you can't trump the deciding issue in every race. some districts the republicans do want to make it about trump. if you are in west virginia where the president probably has 70% job approval rating you want a referendum on trump. but a lot of the districts, particularlies the dozens of districts where the president is not particularly popular and the republicans ar

>> steve bannon is very supportive of his former boss. trump hasd donald made some winds with china, but steve mnuchin is given them away. you have peter navarro and robert lighthizer, steve bannon would probably be in that camp. he is basically saying the secretary treasurer competition between the united states and china. trump changed the dynamic with china, but in one weekend, mnuchin has given it away. >> pretty skating, but it is in fact a truce on trade, how does it play into the readership of the trump summit in singapore and how north korea is handled. >> this is an important strategic reason because donald trump needs china and cooperation from ski jumping. obviouslyn now counseling kim jong-un on how to deal with that. there's a lot at stake for trump to have china on his side to have midterms come up. tensions as a victory. if he loses both of them, it could be negative. china to has a lot at stake. they call for these talks to avoid confrontations and war and regime change and also china doesn't want north korea drawing closer

as i read in the opening here, steve bannon, david bossty and steve cortez. they are against going about this campaign to try to undermined the investigation, and too, i believe they don't think john kelly is pushing back on this investigation. >> yeah, i think we've seen frustration from the president's allies on the outside who feel the ability to voice their decision -- trump and the white house is not taking a strong enough lean when coming this investigation. they seem to want to take aim at rosenstein and sort of part of his deep stay conspiracy that's trying to jurn mine the president. >> what's their role? >> i think the thing here is there are a lot of the president's allies who realize they can't fire robert mueller. a lot of them also acknowledge he shouldn't fire rod rosenstein and are divided on that. they can turn this into a witch hunt and they're looking at the polling out there. they see the president's approval ratings are inching up. and mueller's ratings are inching down particularly when it comes to republicans. they believe they can turn

steve bannon, one of the pivotal figures of the trump election campaign and his chief strategist in thesive interview to newsnight. what does economic nationalism really mean and where

and that is steve bannon and corey lewandowski. none willing to talk on the record. >>> and president trump meets with south korean president moon jae-in at the white house today. some are growing skeptical over the meeting with kim jong-un taking place after rhetoric from north koreans. vice president pence warned north korea could like libya if it fails to make a nuclear deal. >> this will only end like the libya model ended if kim jong-un doesn't make a deal. >> some people saw that as a threat. >> i think it is more of a fact. >> libya, abandoned nuclear weapons in the 2000s. moammar gadhafi was overthrown by washington-backed rebels and was killed. ivan watson has the latest for us. good morning, ivan. >> reporter: good morning, dave. vice president pence went on to say in the interview the military option for north korea has never been taken off the table. it is remarkable how much of a change we have seen from the positive diplomatic messages coming out of washington and pyongyang in recent months to suddenly seeing threats.

you got to get rid of rod rosenstein. >> i think steve bannon is still in his ear. kennedy: do you think that's what the freedom caucus is trying to do, a legal way to 86 rod? >> i don't think they know what they're trying to do. they're lashing out because they feel under threat. they're trying to defend president trump. but the reality is if rod rosenstein goes, that will be a much bigger problem for the president and the mueller investigation isn't going away if rod rosenstein is there or not. the freedom caucus is just flailing, trying to defend the president at all costs. kennedy: they have been very obstructionist on things like obamacare and they're not necessarily in lock step with the white house because as you know, the white house, i mean the. >> no one is in lock step with the white house. kennedy: no. the freedom caucus is about limiting the size of the government. that's neither here nor rosenstein. but rod rosenstein does have a number of conflicts of interest when it comes to the various investigations he's overseeing now or has overseen in the past.

fired back he doesn't pay any attention to steve bannon. i have been working the phones and cobb is going further with friends telling them in private feels liberated, liking it to the scene in braveheart when mogensen screams freedom. >> that is rather dramatic. also dramatic, rudy giuliani making a surprise announcement, made major news on the stormy daniels case. i'm not sure the administration intended to. >> i don't think the white house was expecting this. the pres. possessed aboard air force one about the $130,000 payment, he said he knew nothing about it, go ask my attorney michael cohen who previously told reporters in the federal election commission he paid for this personally. he told fox and the new york times in february neither the trump campaign nor the trump organization paid for this. that left the door open to the pres. personally paying for it. michael cohen added at the time that neither the trump camp nor the trump organization directly or indirectly reimburse the money, the president ran both of those entities. rudy gi

china is a big problem, the one thing steve bannon was right about. china had so many different trade barriers, and the u.s. does get a bad deal on it. but the chinese are not going to give away anything easily. trump is right. i read these things about foreign-policy, the europeans are going to stand up to trump. no they aren't. they are going to find a way to deal with him. europeans -- one at they done -- what have they done? i don't want to give them too much credit. [laughter] >> in terms of policy, i think the party has changed more than trump has. there was already a big fight on immigration inside the party. if you want to look at the future and see how that emphasized someone like tom cotton, who is a little more of a hawk on immigration without the temperament problems of trump. but what is happening to the republican party? ?s it shrinking so badly that's why think you should read this issue of "the weekly standard." ben schapiro does a good job of laying this out. they focused on policy, policy, policy, and voters under 40 are fleeing the

steve bannon has advice for his former boss, plump. hint, it involves more firing.nt out? stay with us. washing machine dying) appliance got you down? head to the sears memorial day event. up to 40 percent off appliances. 52% off this kenmore refrigerator. 50 percent off kenmore elite laundry pairs. find your new appliance at the sears memorial day event. almost $800 when we switched our auto and home insurance. with liberty, we could afford a real babysitter instead of your brother. hey! oh, that's my robe. is it? when you switch to liberty mutual, you could save $782 on auto and home insurance. and still get great coverage for you and your family. call for a free quote today. you could save $782 when liberty stands with you. liberty mutual insurance. you might or joints.hing for your heart... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally found in jellyfish, prevagen is the number one selling brain-health supplement in drug stores nationwide. prevagen. the name to remember. >>> breaking news now. this just in to cnn. president trump has pr

i completely agree with steve bannon.n that could possibly have been made. he has given away the president's defenses. he waived attorney-client privilege. he lies all the time. he seems slightly manic. he is the best thing we democrats -- thank you, donald trump, for putting rudy giuliani on. secondly, facts are stubborn things. steve is right. there are 44 a lot -- lines of questions. i wonder how that got non-leaked out why my various friends got that story from only a couple of people in the room? you but can't believe -- you bring up weeks when the 2 -- when the new york times -- anything that goes on and special prosecutor's office is immediately, to add their typedage, -- i should say up in the new york times. the paper of record the following day. you can't talk about -- this is part of the agreeable. lanny: we had a hard time with lakes at the clinton white house too. i'm sympathetic. truth and facts are stubborn. nomad or what donald trump or steve does -- no matter what theld trump or steve does, truth will pre

injerencia en las elecciones de 2016, un exempleado hijo que la empresa y su entonces vicepresidente, steve bannonento de avivar las tensiones raciales. patricia: rex tillerson estÁ criticando al presidente trump, advirtiendo que la democracia de estados unidos estÁ en peligro. el exfuncionario, destituido por el primer mandatario, dijo que nuestros lÍderes intentan la verdad, si lo aceptamos renunciamos a nuestra libertad. sus declaraciones son parte de un discurso a graduados en una academia militar en virginia. enrique: la tensiÓn de daca se centra en la novena corte de apelaciones en california. se presentase los argumentos a favor encuentra por la demanda interpuesta por los soÑadores contra la decisiÓn de trump de cancelar el programa. reportero: con pocos argumentos legales y muchos racionamientos caprichosos, un abogado del departamento de justicia buscÓ durante media hora persuadir a tres inquisitivo jueces del noveno circuito de apelaciones, que desechen la orden federal de un juez de san francisco y permitan la cancelaciÓn definitiva del programa daca. >> hace tres aÑos defendÍan el pro

steve bannon came out and criticize trump on this. can you tell us the reaction?ound, either hope or despair. and that is what we are getting on both sides of the ground. the white house says they are seeing momentum. chuck grassley from iowa says it is a good thing for farmers. they are seeing the light at the end of the tunnel in the trade fight with china but we need a third-party perspective. -- from the cornell university says it is a brief de-escalation of tension, fundamental differences remain unresolved. are being very critical of trump and the white house. the concessions or backtracking. the truce is how the white house is putting it. has been sponsoring bills targeting companies like zte and he says they are winning. pledging concessions they had already agreed to do. and a senior ranking democrat on the finance committee says that after the tough guy rhetoric from trumps white house, the administration is getting rolled on trade. you mentioned steve bannon, the former adviser, saying "donald trump change the dynamic with china. but in one weekend, ste

just in here, steve bannon, the former white house chief strategist has just said that martin luther him now, would be proud of donald trump. how he justifies that statement? let's get van jones to react. and our breaking news involving the president's son-in-law. cnn learning that jared kushner has met with the special counsel's team for a second time, answering questions for several hours. what we're learning about that meeting next. but speaking to pnc to help handle all your investments was a very important million and one. pnc. make today the day. at t-mobile, we don't just see uniforms. we see the people behind them. so we're committed to helping veterans through job training when their service ends... and to hiring 10,000 veterans and military spouses to be part of our workforce in the next 5 years. because no matter where you serve... or when you serve... t-mobile stands ready to serve you. so we provide half-off on all family lines for military. find thenah.ote yet? honey look, your old portable cd player. my high school rethainer. oh don't... it's early 90s sitcom star dave

but steve bannon sells kristen welker. hould have been fired the moment he advocated waving executive privilege. bannon was arguing fight, fight, fight from the beginning, which is the bannon mantra. >> everybody remotely connected with this administration gets to take a victory lap about the dephenomenon administration of their colleagues. i think it's clear he is gearing up not just to take a more aggressive legal posture but he is on twitter talking about how he is going to obstruct justice, talking about how he is going to speaker fear with the justice department. >> before you go there, i want to bring up the rod rosenstein quote yesterday. i want to play it again. i really -- nothing -- let me play it again. take a listen. >> there have been people who have been making threats privately and publicly against me for quite some time. and i think they should understand by now the department of justice is not going to be extorted. >> extorted. such a word that was designed to insight a response. he knows -- he approved the

his daughter rebecca was on the board, steve bannon was on the board. there weren't a lot of other u.s. persons involved. interesting two of the prosecutors flew to london to question people earlier this month which is a big step, a big move. this looks like more than a fishing expedition. prosecutors are not brought in to check things out but make cases, so they are looking at this. >> we will talk about the legal angle in a second with laura. matthew, the company harvested the private data from tens of millions of facebook profiles and used it to profile americans. talk about how it was used. >> they took a wide swath of information off profiles and trying to build models to predict the personalities of voter, and then you can advertise narrowly at them. you can say we can appeal to their fear with walls and things like that. whether it worked is a huge debate. a lot of people say they never got it right and they weren't close and that they were selling snake oil. the company insists it was the secret sauce and that they're -- at times their former ch

when we were interviewing steve bannon, we were very concerned that steve bannon's lawyer had been receiving transcript of his testimony and then taking it back to the white house, because he also represents don mcgan, the white house counsel. now you see the republicans in congress who are essentially acting as mr. trump's fixers in congress by trying to obstruct mr. rosenstein's information by asking for information about an ongoing investigation. anderson, you know it is long standing protocol in our country, you do not tell anyone about the details about an ongoing investigation because you don't want to jeopardize it. >> do you think it's appropriate to hold back but not necessarily hard evidence? >> yes. i think it's appropriate that only the investigators know about the evidence in the case. i would say that whether it was a republican or democratic investigation. you don't want witnesses to have information about the case. so they kind of cook up a story or tailor their answers to what they know is already out there. you saw this with rudy guiliani coming forward last night on hannit

chief strategist steve bannon was forced to resign about seven months into the administration.ating that there's no military solution to north korea's nuclear threats. forget it. bannon also didn't agree with the firing of fbi director james comey. later after bannon gave a bombshell interview to author michael wolfe trump tweeted that wolfe used sloppy steve bannon who cried when he got fired and begged for his job. veteran affairs secretary david shulkin resigned along with chief of staff reince priebus and secretary of state, rex tillerson, reportedly considered resigning following news report last october that he called the president a moron. >> he said he's never thought of resigning and that he supports the president as much today as he did the day he took this job. >> just five months after that, tillerson officially called it quits. among those who sources say have threatened to quit but are still hanging on, defense secretary james mattis and fbi director christopher wray, though the president denies that. >> no, he didn't at all. he did not even a little bit, nope, an