steve bannon faced a fine and an investigation by the justice department. we believe or we think it's possible that the super pac make america number one was subsidizing stephen bannon's work for the trump campaign of ai making payments abandoned through glittering steel at all see this consulting for the last movie production company located in california at the same address as and his own consulting firm. glittering steel and breitbart are not the only companies tied to the trump campaign $8383.00 will serve boulevard in los angeles also hosts cambridge analytic a company that came under the spotlight for its influence in politics around the globe. cambridge analytical claim to have revolutionary data modeling techniques that can change political campaigning. it was a subsidiary of an english for and its role in donald trump's campaign is regarded as manipulation of public opinion. was through months of protests on an unprecedented scale that would virtually paralyzed home call what began as opposition to an extradition law escalated into a broader pro-dem

what would the addition of former strategist steve bannon or former campaign manager corey lewandowskidd to this fight? it would be quite a flashback to say the least. >> well, certainly bannon and lewandowski are some of the president's fiercest defenders and have been since the early stages of his campaign, and so i think the addition of them would benefit trump in the sense that they would assist in trying to spin the message in the way that the white house would see beneficial and in the way that at least trump's re-election would see beneficialment . we saw corey lewandowski in congressional hearings not too long ago, and he was exceptional at bringing the conversation to his stone walling of congressional questions rather than the tension being directed at what was being asked of him and twhat democrawhat the democ trying to get out of that hearing. that's an example of what i think he would do in being part of this trump white house defense force. >> you couldn't help but think corey lewandowski was auditioning for a position like this. >> it's interesting to remember when steve

steve bannon faced a fine and an investigation by the justice department. we believe or we think it's possible that the super pac make america number one was subsidizing stephen bannon's work for the trump campaign of ai making payments abandoned through glittering steel at all see this consulting for the last movie production company located in california at the same address as and its own consulting firm. glittering steel and breitbart are not the only companies tied to the trump campaign $8383.00 will serve boulevard in los angeles also hosts cambridge analytics a company that came under the spotlight for its influence in politics around the globe. cambridge analytical claim to have revolutionary data modeling techniques that can change political campaigning. it was a subsidiary of an english for and its role in donald trump's campaign is regarded as manipulation of public opinion. they say to really know someone he must walk a mile in their shoes. follow in their footsteps as they forge their way in the world. shares these personal journeys. inspiring st

steve bannon faced a fine and an investigation by the justice department. we believe or we think it's possible that the super pac make america number one was subsidizing stephen bannon's work for the trump campaign of i making payments abandoned through glittering steel at all see this consulting firms last movie production company located in california at the same address as and its own consulting firm. glittering steel and breitbart are not the only companies tied to the trump campaign $8383.00 will serve boulevard in los angeles also hosts cambridge analytics a company that came under the spotlight for its influence in politics around the globe. cambridge analytical claim to have revolutionary data modeling techniques that can change political campaigning. it was a subsidiary of an english for and its role in donald trump's campaign is regarded as manipulation of public opinion. to strengthen the good you have to show your good all the more with you still fight against corruption. dysphoric new cheering heroes like movie robot who refused to $15000000.00

there is a lot of thought behind it by people like michael pillsbury of the how it's an institute steve bannon etc is there anything in their world view of china as well and they cannot make war on the industrial economies of the west that rings true to you as well. not as an economic war i mean that your skills and make any sense i mean china is competing in the international marketplace like any other country is competing in the national market because the program which is the correct problem to focus on is that china because of its economic structure has had certain advantages in terms of the development of its own market. that all the countries more advanced countries including you know what the states including europe have not been able to to obtain but this is not uncommon in terms of the historical development so countries that are rising often cut off their own markets to foreign competition the worst similar that i can think of in historical sense in this case is you know the states which for a very long time was the most difficult country in the late 19th and early 20th century to ge

. >> you go through the book and you have seen after seeing of these republicans who as steve bannon one set of paul ryan was seemingly grown in a petri dish at the heritage foundation, cultivated, we thought there was this army of voters who wanted nothing more than entitlement reform and turns out they quite like their social security and they are more animated by cultural issues like attacking the media, immigration and these other things there there is an amazing scene in the book which i want you to describe it gets to this having breakfast with john boehner in the summer and you ask him whether the republican party will survive or outlive trump and what does he say, he stopped himself. >> he stopped himself. john boehner without hesitating looks up and said there is no-- and then he stopped himself and i said you were about to say there is no republican party and he said well, there is on plays-- paper but what the hell does it mean anymore. john boehner and so many of his ilk, these institutionalist came up in an era in which politics were largely symmetrical. there was a red

thanks for more on all this let's welcome steve bannon, former white house chief strategist steve isesident trump's america first policies you were there then. i know you still talk to the president now. >> i'm just his top student. >> he mentioned that >> i'm his best student. >> either you have insight into how he's thinking or maybe you've actually influenced some of his position. okay, you at least have an idea of what he's thinking on certain things and you have your own ideas. >> i know what his default is. what you're hearing out of beijing is wishful thinking. i think what they're trying to do to a large extent is trying to game the system they're talking about a two-step deal if you look down below it they're talking about, you know, maybe we break off part, 80% of the stuff was covered in lighthizer's deal. we shove everything else off to something else >> security stuff? >> yeah, yeah. this is, this is -- this is -- they're trying to box in donald trump. and i think trump has been the force of stability here. he's been on point in this thing. he said, look, the lighthizer

steve bannon does like to remind he does have the e-mail where he did predict i do think it was after but he really was saying he would win but the other stuff to pre- brief us here are all the reasons why he lost and here's the way you can spend it. that is the reality. >> to add a final quick thought to that the final week of october i was on governor pentz and now vice president as surely as i am sitting here with you that nobody on that plane maybe mike pence believed they were going to win. it is interesting because they were all beginning to spin on the mike pence 2020 as a stable figure of the campaign. and as it his plane went off the runway at laguardia and i was on the plane it was a remarkable scene. nobody knew what the hell. [laughter] and all the top step - - top staffers said the way we have seen the numbers he cannot win. and just coming down into pennsylvania into cell phone range every phone blew up that james comey sent a letter to congress reopening investigation into the hillary clinton e-mails. it is indelible in my mind and i can see it today there were five rep

still ahead, could steve bannon be on his way back to the white house?ides are throwing around as part of their strategy to prevent impeachment. plus we'll have house speaker nancy pelosi's message to democrats as she tries to keep members from overplaying their happened. "morning joe" is coming right back. back through the at&t network, edge-to-edge intelligence gives you the power to see every corner of your growing business. from finding out what's selling best... to managing your fleet... to collaborating remotely with your teams. giving you a nice big edge over your competition. that's the power of edge-to-edge intelligence. mmacramé! obviously. wanna go to the gym? uh, it's too expensive. actually, our unitedhealthcare medicare plans come with renew active, a gym membership and more, at no extra cost. i'm not a workout kinda guy. you get a personalized fitness plan. i'm exercising my brain. and an online brain health program. i need workout clothes? they have tvs here too. renew active, only from unitedhealthcare medicare including the only plans w

funded by robert mercer and headed by steve bannon naturally cambridge on a little car would offer its services to candid donald trump. by late june 26th seen the partnership with a done deal. on july the 29th the 1st payment was sent to the company you can find it's in the campaign account. with 4 payments between july and october 26th in cambridge an emoticon would receive nearly $6000000.00. at the same time the political action committee for donald trump funded by robert mercer paid cambridge analytic top $5000000.00 between november 25th and november 26th in. ultimately the firm would receive $11000000.00 to work with the trump campaign. a digital targeting strategy was made possible and set to run for donald trump. all that was needed was a way to put it to use in the american elections certainly beat some camp which include cambridge analytical saw something in the american electorate that the clinton campaign and the media certainly did not see. it's been reported that thanks to cambridge analytic cuz knowledge of the electorate trumps advisors devise the highly targeted strate

one sees that as a cornerstone of the chinese worldview is it at all surprising that people like steve bannon and michael pillsbury would ultimately see china's strategy as aggressive and aiming to take something away from the united states then i think they take. losses for who lived more than 2000 years ago a little bit too seriously aren't chanos are to to to go outside world is dominated by politics current politics and not the ancient philosophy i spent most of the 1st part of this year in beijing met a lot of policymakers i don't think they are a day have much to advance in terms of their understanding of chinese history or what will trump house of american history which is to say very very little so i don't think that's the issue here i think very often you find an overrating or for china is able to do on the western side and especially on the u.s. side on that front and sort of people now look who shouldn't over look the issue on the chinese side that there is something or competition that there is an attempt very concerted attempt to steal secrets from foreign companies to obtain the

us one quest last question you are part of a group of high profile trump supporters including steve bannon sheriff david clarke and others who are planning on raising private money to build a wall along the us mexico border you even have a go fund me page what i don't get though is i'm pretty sure i heard donald trump say that mexico would be paying for the war. don't discount mexico actually paying for the wall i think most of us have but yet more and more news and look there's a lot of places where it's federal land and in a go fund me individual effort is not possible but there's a lot of places where u.s. ranchers or u.s. landowners own land right up to the border they are sick of their farms effectively being massive. it spots for drug and criminal activity and so they would welcome that the guy who started that is a triple amputee a military veteran who started it and he's raised more than $20000000.00 and the cost per the you for the last people for money when mick went trump told us more than a $100.00 times people have counted that mexico would pay for the wall so why do we need y

and you recall sir, before he met with the president, his chief of staff, and his senior advisor steve bannon, described what kind of role you are being considered for, do you recall that sir? >> i can't describe public conversations. >> i know you can't discuss it, but you can write about it. >> you should buy the book, it is very good. >> let's look at it. >> so you wrote, the plans that were shared with you will oversee political operations, presidential appointments and campaign handling of russian meddling in the 2016 election. you would be on the same level as jared, a senior advisor. is that true that they were talking about you in late may joining that position and playing that role? >> the book is accurate. >> if you keep going on, you met with the president and the president said he didn't want to do it, right now, meaning when you met with them, because if the place isn't better in the next four or five weeks, i am firing everyone. is that correct? >> again, i believe the book is accurate. >> and you thought this was a great opportunity like you wrote, like a little kid getting to

steve bannon is the name you should know from outside the administration.y discussion stage. there is no decision here. president trump is said to be aware of these discussions, but has not taken a decision either way. the other thing that is interesting, we understand the treasury department was not entirely too wild about this stuff coming out in the first place, saying it was not ready for prime time. it is still in the discussion phase. in the past 18 months we have seen a pattern of china being more measured when it comes to news coming out of washington. what are we seeing this time around? has not been any official response to this report. we did have a statement over the weekend from china's very powerful financial specialist regulatory body that they are going to continue their opening process as well as continue to encourage investment into the china market. the financial sector in china has seen significant reforms over the past couple years. plans to remove ownership caps on securities, mutual funds, and life insurance. there have also been move

steve bannon is here. are they trying to undo the will of the american voters?ing in hong kong. preparations, you are looking at a live picture. the 70th birthday celebration as the ccp gets ready for the streets.

the courage today is to be gains to steve bannon and gains to the primary and europe. i hope we see this move to the center continue because here is the real courage in the real wisdom. >> i'm afraid i have to call it to an end. but please join me in thanking him. [applause] >> thank you all so much for joining us, those of you who are saying for the signing if you could remain seated while the rest of everyone exits through the sanctuary librar lobby and l start signing in a few moments [inaudible

the courage today is to be gains to steve bannon and gains to the primary and europe. i hope we see this move to the center continue because here is the real courage in the real wisdom. >> i'm afraid i have to call it to an end. but please join me in thanking him. [applause] >> thank you all so much for joining us, those of you who are saying for the signing if you could remain seated while the rest of everyone exits through the sanctuary librar lobby and l start signing in a few moments [inaudible conversations] >> c-span "washington journal" live everyday with news and policy issues that impact too. coming up saturday morning, we will preview saturday's democratic party convention and the 2020 presidential race with raymond buckley and political reporter paul steinhauser. watch c-span "washington journal" is seven eastern saturday morning and connect with us during the program with the phone calls and facebook questions and starting monday with a new testing feature. >> the new c-span online store has book tv products, go to c-span's store.org to check them out. see

holding his position for more than 2 years and then there's also former white house chief strategist steve bannon and former f.b.i. director james comey to name just a few. let's bring in our panel joining us from washington d.c. joined jones former senate national security director under former national security adviser chuck schumer from birmingham on skype scott lucas founder and editor of in a world view and professor of political science and international studies at the university of birmingham and also from washington d.c. janet venue president and c.e.o. of the truman national security project welcome to you all to the program i'd like to begin with john jones in d.c. 1st in many ways this is been a very extraordinary relationship between the 2 men between john bolton who has been seen as being very hawkish very angry towards iran particularly north korea and wanting to take direct action and donald trump who has a shall we say a more mecurio nature when it comes to foreign policy now it's clear that the 2 men have disagreed and the disagreement has led to john bolton either resigning or b

. -- we have steve bannon. corey lewandowski potentially comes back to run, we don't know if true a trump impeachment war room. new york house democrat greg meeks is now urging all anti-trump whistleblowers to step forward your take. >> my take to have everyone take a pause, this is out of hand. we're too pole orized of a -- holpolarized as a country. okay we have the allegations that president had with new president of ukraine. and there have been other allegations involving collusion with russia, that canno did notn out well even though a big deal of made of it, and a lot of time was wasted. we should take a break, look at the facts, discretely, stop pointing fingers at each other. elizabeth: to this, i don't think that people understand the context of what is going on in country, control of congress has web sawed back and -- whipsawed back and forth since reagan area. i want to get to, the media call to impeach trump started in march 2016, the media pick it up and ran with it even before trump was elected. h

one question last question you are part of a group of high profile trump supporters including steve bannon sheriff david clarke and others who are planning on raising private money to build a wall along the us mexico border you even have a go fund me page what i don't get though is i'm. pretty sure i heard donald trump say that mexico would be paying for the war. don't discount mexico actually paying for the wall i think most of us have but yet more and more news on that look there's a lot of places where it's federal land and in a go fund me.

were making ambitious claims to political power in the streets and white house, when they had steve bannon as their most ally in the power in which they sought for reasons they showed very well in this book, target universities in particular for their wrath. when that happens, in the aftermath of being targeted, thousands of death threats, e-mails, voicemails and administrative efforts, i always maintained that what happened to me was not a question of free speech. for reasons, so all we speech, working at a private university and speaking is quite simply not a question of free speech, it's academic freedom and also a question of what it is that we understand to be the role of speech in our society. many on the ground of free speech many were on the ground of academic freedom even if these are not these values either. they have shown again in this chapter is about the implication of charles, the whites of pharmacist eugenicist. to speak at this prestigious liberal arts college. it is about many things, the years of anxiety, suffering is termination by those of color in the run of this even

with a proposal like this, it's clear that advocates like peter navarro and outside advisors like steve bannonre behind it. they are some of the key advocates. they are very hawkish on china. as i said earlier, they really see a decoupling of the u.s. and china whether it is a ninja markets or otherwise as a key of punishing china cutting them off. they see china as a bad actor in the world and a very big threat technologically economically to the u.s.. something of this extremely it would not be surprising that peter navarro would be an advocate of it. flex we have heard now for many months that the primary goals of the trade dispute has been to over the markets to allow more access to those markets into chinese companies. when move because church that goal? let's >> these tariffs are the belief that the u.s. wants a trade deal and increase transparency three at the same time, to make sure there is a level weighing real for american companies to compete better. like theee these proposal and the capital restraints. we see section against companies like huawei that total u.s. suppliers. .urrenc

with steve bannon and we'll talk about impeachment, his first comments on impeachment since this whole is a guy should know a little bit about how the president operates, what is going down in white house. >> what a great day-to-day buit. christine's birthday today. >> happy birthday. >> you are excused on your birthday from your bad jokes, and gary kaltbaum's birthday is tomorrow. two of my favorite people, you will learn on revamped fox business, the favorite people bring to you what is important to main street not wall street, fox is pull of wonderful people who is bring it to you, one of the reasons it is number one business in the world. >> my motto has always been, every dime counts, not the dime you made but the dime you saved, if we can convey it in an understandable fashion with seriousness but fun we're doing or job hopefully we can continue to do your job. >> we all get along and respect each other's ideas. >> not all the time. >> well, okay. >> yes, we do. >> we do. we respect each other's ideas if they are not the same, we have 9 seconds left, thank you, viewers, ware in o

you look at one of the comments ,n the story from steve bannon he considers china to be a frankensteine his word, created by american capital to some extent. that is the mindset we are looking at from some of the officials inside the white house. i will have to see how it plays out. guy: you think there is any possibility -- the fact that the story comes out in a week where we had a massive focus on impeachment. how long has the gestation been for this idea? brendan: it seems to have been going on for several weeks if not a couple of months behind the scenes. the fact that it is coming out now i do not think is tied to impeachment, but the president definitely wants to go into his 2020 reelection campaign as looking tough on china. elizabeth warren, a potential contender to run against him is considered to be very tough on china as well, more so than joe biden. you can see getting tough on china, whether it is through tariffs or capital controls being something trump could ride into 2020. vonnie: how long does it typically take for china to come back with a response? board rooms across

>> i used to mock the late inning staff shakeups and then donald trump brought on steve bannon and kellyannehs out. it seemed to work out. so you're saying there's a chance. >> stop stealing my lines. >> he steals my lines all the time. >> can we not waste -- quickly on the new polling from fox news. biden still in but they also have a head to head with the president. they do these head to heads with the president, and if anybody listened to our podcast recently, you know how i feel about head to heads. is to how much stock should people actually be putting in the matchups and president trump at this point. >> i think it's still very early, but two things from that poll. number one, if joe biden is making the electability argument over and over again, he's the one who does better over the president of the united states. and if you go back to 1943, essentially, the second world war, what you'll find is no president at this point was trailing by as much as donald trump is trailing joe biden right now. he's the worst of any incumbent right now. >> 1942, when harry likes to say he was born. >> i

this is weighing limited portfolio flows into china, which had been called for by the likes of steve bannonut everyone in the building now, i feel like everyone i know has a hard time wrapping their heads around this. >> change the way you invest early stage? >> it made us look a little more sober. what it also changed, because valuations are so high, we're just doing cna out of the previous fund did series b for us at this point, numbers are too high, and opportunity to see it become 10x i don't think is there i think the valuations are inflated when they have an exit, they're not where you thought they would be i talk about returning the fund on every investment we make, in th this market, i can only do that. >> all of the major indexes are negative dow about flat, but had been 'lita t gh wel be back. be working harder.ways that's why your cash automatically goes into a money market fund when you open a new account. and fidelity's rate is higher than e*trade's, td ameritrade's, even 9 times more than schwab's. plus only fidelity has zero account fees and zero minimums for retail brokerage

we saw it with steve bannon and any number of aides.t we haven't seen before is someone who was fired fighting back and disputing the accounts on the record which john bolton did almost immediately. what's going on, john, is the same thing that's been happening for awhile which is the president had a national security adviser who was inevitably going to be at odds with him. their world views are diametric i opposed and john bolton is somebody who ran for president himself so he sees himself as an equal or greater than the president. this is a discredit to the aides who have been telling us for months about the tensions between them, no you're overstating it. then they admitted to it yesterday. the president is starting from scratch. this is why it is advisable not to pick aides based on how they perform on television but to talk to them ahead of time about -- and not based on how a major donor feels like a sheldon alden s aldenson. i think in the meantime, there might be one of the names on the list. it may be someone else we're not thi

we've got steve bannon on the show.is first interview -- neil: you should do a time delay on that interview just in case. >> we are also going to be talking china, because china of course has a big celebration that's going to be getting under way, this actually as we go to air tonight at 8:00 p.m. eastern. you know, it's the next day there in china so it's the 70th anniversary of the communist party, chinese communist party, and he will have very interesting things to say about where we're heading with china and whether or not we can actually get any kind of deal done. that's pretty meaningful in terms of the trade picture right now, the markets, the economy. are we on the cusp of really getting something with china. we will get his perspective on that. i have marsha blackburn talking about the senate's role in this whole impeachment thing. we have darrell issa. we have mike huckabee. neil: seriously, i look forward to it. thank you very, very much. we are all here for you. hope you like this. i get into this sort of st

i think it was a stark contrast from those like steve bannon that have been with the president beforesolationist, more skeptical of these wars. i think john bolton is genuine in his conviction. i appreciate that. i think with the president goes now is when to be towards keeping campaign promises. >> melissa: is he very similar to secretary pompeo, bolton? in terms of having the same perspective? of being a hawk? or is now the point of view gone for moves with the surrounding a president? how redundant is that, or is that with gone? >> joey: we are seeing a side of secretary pompeo that is not as hawkish. much more in line with president trump strategy of keeping these campaign promises. >> melissa: is not good or bad, in your opinion? >> joey: it depends on how it works out. that's defining the mission in afghanistan. i have set another shows, as recent as this week, the problem with afghanistan as we look at it as an 18-year war. it's been five or six words. politics becomes more important than the strategy and we almost eradicate the taliban, then politics comes in and there's a nee

the president and the number of his advisers at the time, i remember steve bannon really po existencepeople from within were trying to derail his presidency. at the time they were pointing to people at the state department, at the -- but ultimately it went from one extreme to another, where we now have learned that things were so deep on lockdowns that no one was seeing it. >> vivian, good to talk to you as well. white house reporter at the. >>> presidential candidate beto o'rourke joins me next. you are watching msnbc. woman: my reputation was trashed online. i felt completely helpless. my entire career and business were in jeopardy. i called reputation defender. vo: take control of your online reputation. get your free reputation report card at reputationdefender.com. find out your online reputation today and let the experts help you repair it. woman: they were able to restore my good name. vo: visit reputationdefender.com or call 1-877-866-8555. could another come aroundot, the corner. or could it play out differently? i wanted to help protect myself. my doctor recommended eliquis.

this could reportedly include bringing back white house chief strategist steve bannon and former campaignewandowski. in the meantime, the reelection campaign is ramping up advertising amid the impeachment inquiry, and the rnc just launched a multimillion dollar tv and come their first tv ad buy in the ears. this is the messaging around impeachment. for the president, when it comes to be reelection, he can say, "i did this come of this, and this." and the other things are ready to go. but it didn't happen because democrats came with impeachment. for the democrats, they promised health care, this come about, and the other thing, and reelected largely on that. they are going to have to say, "we were busy working on impeachment, so we didn't get these things done. >> brian: that the winning message, right? to say to the american people, "there's a lot of things you would have loved to do for you, boo you're very busy with impeachment so we didn't get any of them." that's why, as this plays out longer and longer, it becomes more and more in the president's favor that impeachment is happening.

of the president's advisers have also mused about bringing back former white house strategist steve bannonthe president's re-election campaign is better prepared to blast out political messaging, with aides pointing out that the campaign's messaging oftentimes forshadows white house talking points. in fact, here is senior white house policy adviser stephen miller on fox news just sunday. >> both the director of national intelligence, and inspector general, said they also found his comments to be credible, and a matter of urgent concern, and they turned it over to the justice department. despite all that, they thought this was a credible complaint. >> they're wrong, chris. >> on what basis. >> chris, i've worked in the government now, the federal government for nearly three years. i know what the deep state looks like. i know the difference between a whistleblower and a deep state operative. this is a deep state operative, pure and simple. >> the president has the state department, he's got the cia, he's got the pentagon, he's got a number of other agencies, were did he use three private la

ambitious claims to political power in the streets but also in the white house, when they had steve bannon as their most steadfast ally in the halls of power, and in which they sought for reasons that p. e. should very well in this book to target universities in particular for the wrath. when that happens, in the aftermath of being targeted with death threats, thousands of death threats, e-mails, voice mails as well as administrative measures, i always maintained that what happened to me was not a question of free speech. this is concrete the case again for reasons that in the chapter on the so-called free-speech crisis at middlebury crisis, p. e. shows well which is speaking at private universities is quite simply not a question of free speech. it's the course of things like academic freedom, a complex concept but also question of what it is that we understand to be the role of speech in our society. many depending on the grounds of free speech. for that i was thankful at the time. many thin on the times of academic freedom even if is not absolute values either. as p. e. shows again in th

piece of his administration, his campaign promises and then something that don mcgahn and others, steve bannon house set about trying to do. i think this is about reminding his base. i don't think you can divorce any of this from the fact that the state of california had tried to make being on the ballot conditional on releasing your taxes. and that was aimed squarely at donald trump. >> and you think this is payback for that? >> at least in part. i don't think it's the only motivation, but i certainly think it's impossible to look at anything going forward between gavin newsom and president trump as away from that. >> david, how much of this is also the governor newsome getting underneath the president's skin? >> well, i'm sure there's some of that. i think what maggie said makes great sense. you know, that was an assault on the president, the demand for his tax returns. but i do think this serves his larger political project. you know, california is a symbol of liberalism and he wants to make the case that, you know, out of control liberalism is what he is fighting and, you know, the homeles

in 2015 baking up with steve bannon and milo yiannopoulos to back donald trump are promised america'sosers it would make them when so much they would get sick of winning. meanwhile, the youth counterculture that had remained on the left orbit of another popular image website, 4chan bible, tumblr.com. on tumblr youth were so deeply steeped in screen worlds, memes and fantasies created a new counterculture to match, identity politics in which the old countercultural obsession with self definitions come seamlessly mingled with fantasy products and entertainment fiction. as the two political fashions merge, they precipitated partly by design but mostly accident, a cautious lowballed into street illustrations, then brawls and finally the violence of charlottesville. the result was at in the wake of trump's rise to power, something wrote in youth culture and politics in general. at first it appeared as though we were finally lost for good and the mirror maze of the screen, helpless watching events transpire behind glass. but on another level of clear pattern was emerging. politics, long con

steve bannon, another at times disgruntled ex-aide leaking about this or speaking about it to reporters saying he was pushing bolton, the hawkish diplomat for the job, but initial ri quote, bolton's mustache is a problem bannon says. trump doesn't think he looks the part, you know bolton is an acquired taste. i mean, how much of this is sort of a story in reverse that donald trump's initial concerns about bolton related to quote, unquote casting and appearance, and then by the end, he appears to have been dragged to actual policy debates in the situation room. >> i think it has some measure to it. you know how trump is. if you don't come from central casting he doesn't particularly like you, and i think right now -- i think it will be fascinating to see who he's going to bring on board. you know, he's probably going to go out and try to find the most disgraced general he could find at this point, probably general boykin or somebody who was fired from their job and say okay, i've got a general who's more like me in this position. but the real problem here is bolton resigned, and he made

holding his position for more than 2 years and then there's also former white house chief strategist steve bannon and former f.b.i. director james comey to name just a few. let's bring in our panel joining us from washington d.c. joined jones former senate national security director under former national security adviser chuck schumer from birmingham on skype scott lucas founder and editor of in a world view and professor of political science and international studies at the university of birmingham and also from washington d.c. janet venue president and c.e.o. of the truman national security project welcome to you all to the program i'd like to begin with john jones in d.c. 1st in many ways this is been a very extraordinary relationship between the 2 men between john bolton who has been seen as being very hawkish very angry towards iran particularly north korea and wanting to take direct action and donald trump who has a shall we say a more mecurio nature when it comes to foreign policy now it's clear that the 2 men have disagreed and the disagreement has led to john bolton either resigning or b

it's straight out of the steve bannon playbook and it's all designed to set upa playbook and it's allent. finally, iwonder set up a people versus parliament argument. finally, i wonder if you could tell our audience about some of the threats, violent threats and death threats, that you have had. yes. i have had threats of rape, threats that i should be murdered and have my head chopped off, my days are numbered. and on and on and on. the abuse comes every single day. thankfully, the death threats don't. there was a period early in the year when i did receive a number but thankfully not so many of late, but thankfully not so many of late, but the abuse comes every single day and last night as a result of what happened yesterday, although i received a huge amount of support, and the majority of messages, the overwhelming majority of communications i received were supportive, including from many conservative voters and people who weren't necessarily affiliated to the labour party, but equally i received some horrific abuse last night, much of it misogynistic language and that is just rea

to say he is divisive is an understatement and now steve bannon says if reelected it will be four yearsof unrequited payback. payback for what? this guy is unhinged. >> the governor is right. for trumpet is just a scare tactic but listen to me. for the american people it is a real issue. people in this country illegally and what do we do about it is a real issue. are we a sovereign nation, do we have borders? we going to defend those borders? it is a real issue not a scare tactic to a lot of americans. the governor's right. when it comes to people coming here legally the more the merrier and doesn't matter what your color is, doesn't matter what your creed is, doesn't matter what country you come from. none of that matters. we welcome you if you want freedom and opportunity. when it comes to people in this country illegally, people who come here illegally that is another issue where republicans and democrats have to find a solution because you live on the border right now, you live in texas and arizona it is easy to say and our manhattan studio we don't have a problem with illegal immig

pure politics and the lowest type of flow just to say he is divisive is an understatement and now steve bannon says if he is reelected it will be payback for what quick c is unhinged. >> the governor is right the scare tactic but for the american people it is a real issue. people of this country illegally and what to do about it. are we a sovereign nation do we have borders cracks it is a real issue. not a scare tactic to a lot of americans. the governor's right people coming here legally the more the merrier it doesn't matter your color or your creed or what country you come from. none of that matters if you want freedom and opportunity but when it comes to people in this country illegally or those who come here illegally , again that's another issue where republicans and democrats have to find a solution because you live on the border right now in texas and arizona is easy to say in the manhattan studio we'll have a problem with illegal immigration but live on the border for a month it is a real issue that impacts americans but neither party is prepared to talk about it. >> so now let's do a

steve bannon because of some various dealings, many decades -- probably a decade or two ago ended upwe have breaking news steve liesman. >> been reporting every day since a week ago monday, the interventions, the liquidity offerings on the federal reserve and new york fed we have the results this morning. 65.7 billion or point 8 billion was submitted and 65.8 billion was accepted and the fed is making available up to $75 billion for overnight repo operations the stock, the lowest rate 180 and the gap the low and the high, 184. looks like things are getting a little more normal fed officials said in interviews with cnbc, they're continuing to watch and study the repo market. they're understanding why the market is trading outside of the fed funds rate without fed intervention the instability does not give any kind of credit concerns or underlying problems like it did with the financial crisis. they're trying to figure out why a rate that should trade closer to 2% traded above 7% last week and required the fed to step in with what are now daily injections of up to $75 billion worldwide