steve bannon served as vice president of the for. from the i. the objective was clear nothing less than a revolution in the election campaign process despite multiple interview requests cambridge analytical has refused to speak with us. but it's possible to understand the work they did by simply watching their advertisements political campaigns have changed they're no longer about running the most t.v. spots sending out the most direct mail or spending the most money they're about to spend the smartest in today's political world but campaigns are getting more expensive and elections are won by small but crucial numbers of votes putting the right message in front of the right person at the right moment is more important than ever this is where cambridge analytical in our revolutionary data modeling techniques can help. it sounds like a more logical approach to campaign strategizing however the reality is more complex and above all much murkier than cambridge analytical was willing to admit it. since coming to the united states the firm embarked o

steve bannon offered no response.e of the sources of her research appear not to be credible. amanda piefr first alerted cnn to issues with the citations at the end of yan's paper. >> people who aren't experts, aren't scientists, who have not done anything, these are not coming from credible sources. i think that's concerning. >> reporter: a cnn analyst finds yan's sky stations appeared as a paper that was o post on linked inn, written by someone cnn cannot locate. three of the citations that linked to posts on a website opposed to generically modified food. then there is citation 23 which links to anonymous blog posts published back in march. parts of yan's papers appear to be pulled directly from anonymous blogs. >> i don't want to say copy and pasted but it almost has that same effect. >> they took the exact same anything, the exact same phrasing and the exact same captions and put those into the report that was yan's paper and that does not happen in science. >> reporter: guess where one of those blogs first appear

steve bannon offered no response. yet there is more about yan's work.he sources of her research appear not to be credible. a lady getting a ph.d. in chemical biology first alerted cnn to citations at the end of yan's. >> these are not coming from credible sources and i think that is concerning. >> reporter: a paper only appeared as a post on a linkedin a report written by a person that cnn cannot locate running a company that does not seem to exist. three of the citations that link to genetically modify food and citation 23 that links to a post published in march. part of yan's paper are pulled from these anonymous blogs. >> it has the same esffect. >> they took things that were the same and put that into yan's paper and that does not happen in science. >> reporter: guess where one of those blogs first appeared months before yan's paper? g-news, the disinformation news site linked to steve bannon and miles gow. >> as much as i hate to think of them using their work for political propaganda to me what it seems to be. >> reporter: there is just no informa

steve bannon offered no response. yet, there is more about her work.e of the sources that her research appear not to be credible. amanda pfeiffer getting a ph.d. in biology first alerted cnn with the citations at the end of her paper. >> people who are experts, scientists, who haven't done anything coming from not credible sources, i think that's really concerning. >> a cnn analysis include a paper that appears as a post on a linkedin, or a person that knn cannot locate, running a company that does not seem to exist. three of the citations that linked to posts on a website opposed to genetically modified food. then there is citation 23. which links to anonymous progress posts published back in march. parts of her papers appear to be pulled directly from these anonymous progresss. >> i don't want to say copy and pasted. it has the same effect? they took the exact figures and phrasing and caption and put those into the report that was jan's paper. that does not happen in science. >> guess where one of those blogs first appeared months before yan's paper,

tom: that is going to get the suburban voter, steve bannon and mayor giuliani?ve another minute. don't worry. kevin: i think in covering the trump campaign, some of the alignments in the inner circle, it is fascinating to watch that shift, and there is a clear relationship that has developed between steve and rudy giuliani. -- steve bannon and rudy giuliani. we will see how that develops. tom: this is phenomenal. jon, you have an inner orbit, don't you? [laughter] kevin: mi inner orbit -- am i inner orbit? tom: yes. kevin: thank you. appreciate it. jonathan: kevin, thank you. don't know if you will be back tomorrow. [laughter] this is bloomberg. ♪ >> we are now fully in this reflationary reopening stage of the economy. >> half the economy is going to have come back. the other half will not have come back, can't come back. >> we have never had these trajectories. >> the failure of both monetary and fiscal policy is that the money isn't getting to the right people. >> the fed is very concerned about the outlook. >> this is "bloomberg surveillance" with tom keene,

steve bannon has no response. some sources of her research appear to not be credible. amanda piper alerted cnn to citations at the end of the paper. >> people who aren't experts, people who aren't scientists, people who haven't done anything. these are not coming from credible sources. i think that's really concerning. >> reporter: a cnn analysis finds the citations include a paper that appeared only as a post on a linkedin. a report written by a person that cnn cannot locate, running a company that does not seem to exist. three of the citations that link to posts on a website opposed to genetically modified food. then there is citation 23, which links to anonymous blog posts, published in march, parts of the papers appear to be pulled directly from these anonymous blogs. >> i don't want to say copied and pasted but the same effect. >> they took the exact same figures and phrasing, the exact same captions, and put those into the report that was yan's paper. that does not happen in science. >> reporter: and guess where one of those blogs first appeared months before yan

steve bannon, great to see you. come back soon.her subject here. have you gotten your mammogram? we're going to talk with one of the leading producers of mammograms to tell you what's been going on during this shutdown and pandemic. stay with us. this is decision tech. find a stock based on your interests or what's trending. get real-time insights in your customized view of the market. it's smarter trading technology for smarter trading decisions. fidelity. that i've started to do on ancestry. having ancestry to fill in the gaps with documents, with photographs, connecting in real time means that we're having conversations that are richer. i have now a closer relationship with my grandfather. i can't think of a better gift to give to my daughter and the generations that come after her. bring your family history to life like never before. get started for free at ancestry.com bring your family history to life like never before. >> tech: every customer has their own safelite story. this couple was on a camping trip... ...when their wi

the post has said it obtained the emails through two trump confidants, rudy giuliani, and steve bannone are you learning here? >> reporter: we're learning that the fbi is lead thing investigation, which is looking into whether this russian disinformation campaign that has been targeting joe biden's campaign, spreading this idea that he was part of some corrupt business ties of his son, who was serving on the board of a ukrainian energy company called burisma, that somehow this involved corruption of joe biden. that's what the russians have been trying to spread. and whether that is now connected to this new set of emails, alleged emails, that have been published by "the new york post." now, these are emails that allegedly show hunter biden trying to monetize and trying to use his ties, his father's position obviously in the obama administration to make money. and so that is what the fbi is now taking a look at, to see whether all of these things are connected. "the washington post" is now reporting, erin, that the president himself and the white house were warned that rudy giuliani was

investigations and i think it will be fairly painful investigation for the trump's camp. >> we have seen steve bannon'se popped up around this story, what more can you tell us s ? >> only bannon is the original force. he tipped us off of the laptop that had all the materials on it. there were photos of hunter biden and videos and e-mails that appeared to be genuine. we don't know if any of eat were doctored. no one claimed in 2016 it was manufactured or faked. everyone commented at the time it would be easy for foreign intelligence agency to do that. now we are being cautious to do this. there is an e-mail about a meeting that joe biden allegedly had. and rudy giuliani won't give the copy so until then we can't accept it is real. >> it is widely known that rudy giuliani had been wonderirking russian intelligence -- why not release it? >> well, typically doj does not release the results of its investigatio investigatio investigatio investigations: good bad or otherwise. this is an investigation that's conducted under the public's eye. this is an investigation that looks like it was ordered by the presid

, for example, and steve bannon's contact donald trump. the carter page warrant were direct assault and first and fourth amendment rights of all americans and you say this isn't a partisan issue and people from the spectrum view it as an american issue. as this unfolded, when did you start to believe that they weren't just after you, they were trying to get to perhaps president trump or others on the campaign? >> well, it's interesting, sheryl because i actually threw my contact with the intelligence community and i had someone give me the head's up even before the first -- one of the main defamatory articles which was used by the comey by -- fbi to t the fraudulent warrant, way back in 2016i contacted mine with ties to the intel community told me that the democrats had paid quote, unquote, opposition research people to dig up dirt on then candidate trump and his supporters such as me. so i knew that they were in the process of trying to come up with these lies, primarily with the initial idea of just pumping it out to the media and gettin

your post says they got these hunter biden e-mails from rudy guiliani and steve bannon, that they were left in a repair shop in delaware, which according to guiliani's lawyer then reached out to guiliani, bannon according to paper cated he knew about the hunter biden e-mails last month. for a long time, guiliani has been openly working to did he go up dirt and promote disinformation on the bidens. one person he has teamed up with is a ukrainian prescription andre derkoch named by the russian community as a russian agent and sanctioned by the u.s. treasury department so here have you rudy guiliani openly working with a phone russianing a and now the washington post is reporting the intelligence community was so concerned that the russians were using guiliani to feed russian disinformation to the president that they warned the white house about it last year. guiliani, as you can imagine is denying this. take a listen. >> no one in the intelligence community warned me. the president didn't say that to me. this is the first time i am hearing that. >> right. >> and i have a pretty good idea

steve bannon and rudy giuliani may have fractured evidence and wanted so forth, the hard drivee emailsu have a real live wi. that witness has said in public now it can be taught to testify on the hill under oath or brought to testify before prosecutors and fbi agents under oath that he heard joe biden a hunter biden talk about plans for hunter biden was going to be paid an enormous sums of money for not doing very much other than making introductions. that sounds like corruption may not be illegal, might be bribery, but the very least it's bad judgment. if you need to know what were the chinese up to when they were paying all the sums of money. it where they trying to buy influence? where they trying to get in good? these are all important things that have to be answered either in testimony for the hill where an prosecutors may know to the american people. >> shannon: so, the former vice president said that i released my tax returns and you're not going to find anything there. andrew mccarthy are buddy tweets it out tonight, just heard the biden defense, no big pay off my tax returns i

steve bannon, former white house chief strategist. stay with us. we'll be right back.me for the word on wall street, top investors watching your money this week. joining me right now is allie mccartney, mike murphy and francis newton stacy. great to see everybody this morning. thank you for being here. first up, investors are waiting on september retail sales due out in just over an hour. this is expected to see a gain of 7/10 of a percent for the month of september that would be up from august's 6/10 of a percent and up from the estimate, which is 5/10 of of a percent. mike murphy, how important is this number? is this a market mover? >> i think it could be, maria. good morning. i think the big news is the jobs front. you know, more people are getting back to work. americans are doing what americans do. we recover. we have the massive selloff from the pandemic and people, the country was shut down. now people are out and they're spending money. they're spending it in different places, though. they're spending it on their homes, furniture and renovations. as a proxy fo

and former white house chief strategist, steve bannon will be here.lus, model, actress and event entrepreneur, pamela anderson will be here. in the 8:00 a.m. hour, barry sternlict, on how he's allocating capital today. and the ceo of regeneron is here, on the coronavirus treatment that has president trump feeling better. don't miss a moment of it. you're watching "mornings with maria," live on fox business. ♪ when you just can't break away. ♪ oh, young hearts, run free. ♪ never be hung up -- ok, just keep coloring there... and sweetie can you just be... gentle with the pens. okey. okey. i know. gentle..gentle new projects means new project managers. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. the moment you sponsor a job on indeed you get a short list of quality candidates from our resume database so you can start hiring right away. claim your seventy five dollar credit, when you post your first job at indeed.com/home. but when i started seeing things, i didn't know what was happening... so i kept it in. he started believing things that weren't tr

steve bannon.liani gave the postal service a copy of a hard drive containing the emails. the post claims the emails were found on a laptop computer brought to a repair shop in delaware in the twinge of 2019 and a stop oopgs employee saw the emails and then was worried about getting in trouble or in danger and he made copies of them. there is a lot about it story that doesn't add up. the employee has not helped matters. he contradicted himself in interviews with reporters. and, i mean, for all we know, these emails are made up or maybe some are real and others are fakes. we don't know. but we do know that this is a classic example of the right-wing media machine. a tip from bannon and a hard drive dump from rudy led a former producer for sean hannity's thoushow to write a s to trash the bidens on fox and trump has been hyping the drama for days on end and this is how it goes on and on. don jr.'s tweet from a while ago, how, he says, how will the media attempt to sweep this one under the rug? that is

the issue of hunter biden, this laptop in the hands of steve bannon and rudy giuliani, finding itsayo the new york post, there are questions about it. the suggestion is that shows there was corruption between hunter biden and his father when they were vice president. that may fire up some of the base. does it reach americans worried about their jobs or coronavirus? many republicans think this is not going to change the tone of the debate. it is possible joe biden will say my son has had problems in his life. this is not going to be, the american people are not concerned about it. jane: what will we hear from joe biden if all he needs is a draw? that is not a high threshold. n: i think joe biden will one to show he would be a different style of president. we've had the presidency with the volume turned up to 11 the past four years. it is likely we have been on a fast motorboat going through choppy waters. he's going to say i have this ocean liner. i'm going to steer us in, or waters. it will go back to being the way we were, less divided and angry. i think that is essentially the bide

and rudy giuliani. >> steve bannon, who could go wrong?"the new york post" put out a story with an email which is not confirmed to be authentic and suggested a meeting between joe biden and a representative from the ukrainian company that had once paid hunter. >> wait, where are we spreading the lies here? because biden said no evidence. the campaign said there's no evidence of meeting -- the meeting ever took place and "the new york post" never asked the campaign about the critical elements of the story and a former official who talked to "the washington post," the intelligence raised concerns that giuliani -- here we are in 2020. this is what it's come down to, america. giuliani is feeding russian misinformation to donald trump and feeding russian disinformation to "the new york post" and it is so obviously disinformation that the person who writes the story won't put their name on it because they know it's a lie. >> yeah. well -- >> that's where we are in 2020. just to let you know. they're still talking, the russians and by the way, ru

. >> reporter: last week giuliani and former trump official steve bannon provided the "new york post" with emails alleging ukrainian partners with a possible meeting with joe biden when he was vice president. a meeting the biden campaign says never took place. experts say the emails cannot be authenticated. some may have been altered or are fake. >> we have no idea whether or not the emails are legitimate but this whole operation looks right out of the kremlin playbook, hack and dump. >> that was andrea michitchell reporting there. >>> a policy universally accepted by the u.s., european union and the imf and world bank. >>> governor gavin newsom is responding to an l.a. times report saying a spy plane was used to monitor where a national guard lives. the times says it's happened in many different cases around george floyd's protest. a similar thing was done three other cities, minneapolis, washington, d.c., and phoenix. the sheriff's office requested the surveillance and the governor says that changes have been made since. the head of the guard baldwin tells the a."l.a. times" had not

former white house chief strategist steve bannon is here.schel walker's son, weighing in on the black and hispanic vote before election day. plus, greg stubbe gives us a look ahead to the big tech hearing on capitol hill. you're watching "mornings with maria" live on fox business. ♪ make you come alive. ♪ i can take you higher. ♪ non-valvular afib can mean a lifetime of blood thinners. and if you're troubled by falls and bleeds, worry follows you everywhere. over 100,000 people have left blood thinners behind with watchman. it's a one-time, minimally invasive procedure that reduces stroke risk-- and bleeding worry--for life. watchman. it's one time. for a lifetime. and i'm still going for my best. even though i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib not caused by a heart valve problem. so if there's a better treatment than warfarin, i'm on top of that. eliquis. eliquis is proven to reduce stroke risk better than warfarin. plus has significantly less major bleeding than warfarin. eliquis is fda-approved and has both. what's next? getti

that have been in his inner circle, such as the brink, a documentary about former trump adviser, steve bannonear after he's become the most famous and powerful that he ever has been in his entire life because of his association with the trump campaign and then the trump white house. he leaves the white house, and he is trying to figure out how to maintain, if not extend and grow his power and influence. allison clayman's documentary joins a number of movies critiquing the trump administration. many of these films have touched audiences and garnered acclaim, but when it comes to the real world, there's still a question of whether these pictures can bring about actual change. it's really hard to imagine what could convert someone. i think what film—makers like me are doing is a little bit more about exposing, you see with your own eyes what's happening behind closed doors. i think you should let me run the country. those who oppose trump aren't the only film—makers who have been enboldened during this time. dinesh d'souza, a far—right film—maker who was convicted of campaign finance fraud was g

before we launch to a discussion of carl hoffman "liar's circus" and steve bannon's imposture would like to share history about the strain. it was done in 1927. stretch of mean square, the book would wait

the "new york post" says they got these e-mails from rudy giuliani and steve bannon, that they were found on a --top le-- laptop left in a repair shot. for a long time rudy giuliani has been openly working to dig up dirt and promote disforms on the bidens. one person he's teamed up is a ukraine lan politics, who has been named by the u.s. intelligence community and even has been sanctioned by the u.s. treasury department. you have giuliani openly working with a known russian agent, "new york post" and is now reporting that the intelligence community was so concerned that the russians were using giuliani to feed information to donald trump, they warned the white house about it last year. giuliani, as you might imagine is denying this. listen to what he said today on fox news. >> no one in the trump administration warned me, no one in the intelligence community warned me, the president didn't say that to me. this is the first time i'm hearing that. i have a pretty good idea of where it's coming from. these are people trying to tear down donald trump and destroy his presidency inside the int

. >> scar moochie said i'm not steve bannon, i'm not trying to suck my own -- >> what trump will nothe congressional black caucus -- >> do you want to set up the meeting? >> frederic douglas is an example of someone who's done an i mazing job and recognized more and more. >> you will be receiving the presidential medal of freedom. >> when you wash your hands it takes you if you've times longer. i won't talk about the fact people have to flush their toilet 15 times. greta must work on her arrange management problem, chill, chill. i think there's possibly drugs involved. >> i love this guy here. >> plus the f.b.i. over the florida school shooting they're spending too much time trying to prove russian collusion. >> reducing the number of mail sorting machines and removing collection boxes. >> christmas stuff that who gives a (~bleep ) about christmas stuff but i need to do it, right? >> whoo! damn that's exhausting and that brings us to tonight's final scandal coming in at number 7 #, it involved the secret service, saudi sheiks and a one star who tell that gets a yelp review from the u

. >> this is steve bannon hasn'ting a tip over, and rudy giuliani handing over the documents, and creatinghis appearance of a scandal. hunter biden has acknowledged he had poor judgment in working with foreign enterprise when is he father was vice president. this was all litigated last year during the impeachment saga, but the right-wing media wants it back in the news. they view it as a closing argument for the trump campaign. trump is tweeting a storm, but the real story is the maneuvering by rudy to try to stir up a scandal. and i have confirmed that some "new york post" writers, were so wary of the story, they saw how sketchy it was they didn't want anything to do it, they didn't want their bylines. normally we want to make sure we want to get credit for it, but in this case, no, "new york post" reporters ranted the opposite. they could sense this was a very sketchy, dubious story. >> i want to know, the president again attacked dr. fauci. >> i think dr. fauci is a very nice man, but we let him do what he wants to do, he loves being on television, and we let him do it, sometimes he tel

because this is an example of steve bannon giving a tip to a new yorkrk post reporter, rudy giulianiver documents, "the new york post" on the front page and fox running with it for days on end creating this appearance of a scandal involving hunter biden. >> tucker: why don't you assess the emails? what do they say? they don't tell you. it's the right-wing media machine working with the russians. it's not even journalism. it's really irresponsible. yesterday, the director of national intelligence tried to put an end to us. if there is, as we've said, and he confirmed yesterday, zero evidence showing the russians planted that laptop or invented at anyap of the documents on it. today fox news were told that the fbi concur with that reckless assessment. another source confirms the email are authentic, what we've told you from day one grade we seen a lot of them, they are real. you may not think they are a big deal, you could make that argument, but they are real. at the russians didn't do this. to our media and sitting members of congress, all of those denials just prove their point. it

. >> trevor: one of the more eye opening interviews you did or your show did was with steve bannon. > what their relationship, is he said trump is going to contest this election at all costs and make ate fight regardless whooft happens to make sure the election is his. how do you process that information? do you think it's bluster or do you think it's real? >> i think steve beenen has a window into trump's soul that very few do which is why he's a very universals narrator in this moment. but i think he's right, i think there's zero chance trump will concede, even if he does not create complete chaos in the aftermath, there's no way trump will come out saying i lost. as someone who is perhaps a clinical narcissist, i'm not sure, but it is a violation of his sort of core ethic to admit a loss and that is not going to happen. the ultimate question lies with republican governors and republicans in legislatures and in congress, are you going to be foot soldiers for chaos? are you going to -- >> trevor: you speak to them. what if they said? do they seem they're going to go with trump if he

steve bannon came in and said the goal of the trump rev solution is to deconstruct.ning government. this is the same federal government that electrified america, built the highway system, desegregated schools. we forget all the amazing things that the government does and we focus on a bridge to know where. the result is when you have a pandemic, if you have been busy and work trying to destroy the federal government and the republicans have been in charge for a lot of it, it's not going to function well. and the places that have done well, in east asia, they respect them, the curable trust and when there's an emergency, the governments function. >> thank you so much. i have the book. it is fabulous. thank you, and the book is called ten lessons for a post pandemic world. thank you, for reed, we will be back. what do we want for dinner? burger... i want a sugar cookie... wait... i want a bucket of chicken... i want... ♪ it's the easiest because it's the cheesiest. kraft. for the win win. >> tech: every customer has their own safelite story. this couple was on a campin

we don't understand how these emails got from wilmington to the new york post anding and steve bannonof it. the biden campaign has been clear. joe biden did not have a meeting with this individual. there was no public meetings on his schedule. what you're going to hear from the vice-president in the debate and in the closing days of this election is not about this sort of trumped up scandal and more about what he's going to do for the american people. i would advise donald trump and his campaign to be very careful how they move with this story. in the closing arguments of this election with covid-19 on the rise in 36 states do you really want to close on joe biden being corrupt or do you want to have a message for the american people? in 2016 the reason beam resonated with people he talked about building the wall and fixing american trade issues and draining the swap , with just 14 days left that closing message? there isn't one >> harris: it is a valid question, james freeman. where do you want to put the last time that you see this many of the american people in one venue? no matter

>> i've got to ask you because steve bannon has said if trump loses 3% to 4% of the establishment republicans it could sink him. what are your polls and research showing you? are there that many of you right now, enough to sink him, 3% to 4%? >> yeah, that's always been the great fallacy that, you know, the republican party was just awash with trumpism. that is not the case. it still references a very small portion of rank and file republicans inside the party. and you see that now as more and more, particularly in suburban america, even among white men which was a big part of the support and the base that the president had, some peeling off there. so, the reality of it is the impact of covid more than anything else has put a spotlight on leadership and has put a spotlight on character. and so a lot of folks realize, yeah, it kind of matters who's behind the resolute desk in making big decisions that impact my job, my family, my community, my health. and so it matters. so, for a lot of those republicans, it's just kind of nice to see more and more of them coming out, speaking to that inside/o

giuliani, who i believe we talked to last week, and sourced out of maybe steve bannon as well. very political, very angled. but all of a sudden, the heat is on, as it has been in elections since the beginning of time. jonathan: one week feels like a lifetime, and we've got three more of them still to come. tom: at 4:00 p.m. yesterday, i literally turned and said, it is wednesday, right? i have lost track of the days. jonathan: alongside tom keene, i'm jon ferro, together with lisa abramowicz. coming up on the program, liz ann sonders, charles schwab chief investment strategist. any words for the dog this morning? tom: it's his birthday. lisa: happy birthday. jonathan: happy birthday. there you go. this show is nuts. [laughter] equities down two. tom: he wants to move out. jonathan: this is bloomberg. ♪ kailey: with the first word news, i'm kailey leinz. prospects for another stimulus package before election day look bleak. president trump and senate republicans are at odds. the president was urging them to "go big or go home," but senate majority leader mitch mcconnell is only

although, to be fair to trump, guys, he has spent a lot of time with stephen miller, steve bannon, jeffsions and the rest of the dudes, so, i mean, usually, he probably is the least racist person in the room. by the way, i love how he always says that he's done the most for black people with the possible exception of abraham lincoln. the possible exception. like, yeah, lincoln freed the slaves, but trump gave omarosa, like, three jobs! three jobs! but there you have it, last night's debate is done. and with it the debate season of the 2020 election cycle is over. it's been a long journey. a long journey from that first debate with 4,000 democratic candidates up until now. and you know what we thought? we thought, since we're saying goodbye, let's take one last look at all the fun we had. ♪ ♪ >> a billionaire who calls women fat broads and horse faced lesbians, i'm talking about mayor bloomberg. >> if we're going to force americans to make these radical changes, they're not going to go along. throw your hands up, but you -- >> mr. vice president, there's a saying in my community you're d

we are talking about steve bannon, brad paschal, manafort, roger stone.nd is it as michael cohen says that it is just him? >> well, i think that we know from what we've seen the last four years is that this is a president who keeps his own couns counsel. like a lawyer representing position in trial, he has a fool for a client. and that is really what has played out over time. trump is someone who likes to have a bunch of competing interests and stroivoices jocke for positions, but this is not someone capable of listening to any advice because he is a na narcicisstic and you touthorita person and the reason why we have 220 240ur,000 dead america yes doesn't listen to experts. he just goes out there and spews whatever comes to his adle minded brain and there is carnage everywhere. and every person who would be an adviser has been hoping and wishing that he would take their advice. but instead, because they know that he won't, they are out there just spending his money. this guy went through $1 billion somehow, most of the time not even having an opponent. t

correctness is appealing to a certain group of people in this country, everyone from roger stone and steve bannonisenfranchised blue collar worker because they themselves feel shunned by the politically correct group i call the latte liberals who hold to the principles of right and wrong and act as if the conflicts we face in this country are nothing more than material for a stump speech. this kind of speaking, purity politics is just as dangerous adds trump's obvious disdain for democratic norms. listen, joe biden is no latte liberal. can he win back the blue collar voters from trump? >> i think he can win back the blue collars from trump because the blue collar workers from trump has not received any of the things that trump has committed. and biden understands their everyday lives. he comes from them. he relates to them. trump has never been a blue collar worker. he has never been socially or culturally relational with them. he has been rejected by many of the power elite, those of us who come out of new york, he is about nine years older than me, but brooklyn, the same kind of environment kno

. >> that's right, this is an example of steve bannon giving a tip to a new york post reporter, rudyliani handing over a bunch of documents, "the new york post" putting it on the front page and then fox running with it for days on end, creating disappearance of a scandal involving hunter biden. >> tucker: but why don't you assess the emails? what did they say? they don't tell you. it's the right-wing media machine working with the russians. that's not even journalism. that's really responsible. yesterday the director of national intelligence tried to put an end to this. if there is, as we've said, and he confirmed yesterday, precisely zero evidence showing the russians planted that laptop or invented any of the documents on it or conspired to leak it or played any role at all. today the senior federal law enforcement official told fox news that the fbi and doj concurred with that assessment. another log forstmann confirms they are -- what we told you from day one. we've seen a lot of them. they are real. you may not think there are a big deal. you can make that argument, but they're

it has the fingerprints of rudy giuliani and steve bannon, both of whom have been involved in pushing conspiracy theories in the past, both of whom have legal trouble now and declining credibility. second of all, apparently this email came to be known because of a shopkeeper who said hunter biden dropped off his computers but he's legally blind and couldn't be sure it was hunter biden. he gave an interview in which he contradicted himself many times and he refused to disclose the nature of his relationship with rudy giuliani. furthermore, the biden campaign has denied any such meeting took place, hunter biden has denied through his lawyer that any such meeting took place. journalists need to be careful until we have some actual authenticity to this email. there's no metadata on this email that "the new york post" published in the picture and there's no header on it and there's plenty of reason to doubt it. journalists like byron york could've been caught up in a russian disinformation campaign if they are claiming that this email is accurate without having the facts. >> jon: let's tur

the new york post said they got these e-mails from steve bannon.d a dutch broadca broadcaster that people should stand by for news from joe biden. this is not the first time bannon has tried to dig up dirt on the opponent. he was actually sanctioned by the u.s. treasury department. you have rudy giuliani openly working with a known russian agent and the president was reportedly warned about it. the "washington post" now reporting that the intelligence community was so concerned about this that they told the white house, and then the national security adviser himself told the president that any information that rudy giuliani brought to him could be contaminated by russia, wolf. >> that's pretty stark, indeed. what is rudy giuliani saying to this idea that he could become a tool for the russians? >> he's denying all of this. he's trotting out the deep state argument we've heard from many in the trump orbit saying members of the intelligence community are out to get trump. take a look at what he said earlier on fox news. >> no one in the trump adminis

rudy giuliani, steve bannon and they won't give you the actual emails. am saying -- >> jesse: maybe they will give them to you. >> juan: go after those sources but i'm just telling you, you can't find the emails. >> jesse: you actually have to see an email, that's your standard? the company has to actually hold the email in your hand in order to verify that it's true? that's a high standard you will never meet. emily, juan was saying a couple minutes ago that these companies can do whatever they want. they can't do whatever they wanted and now the fcc is saying we are going to look at rule 230 that allows them the world that they lead into beaches publishers, they can just put it out there and not edit it and not tweak it and now that's jeopardized and so is a lot of money. >> emily: that's absolutely right. they are bound by regulations as well as their own terms and conditions and there are multiple government agencies that are investigating them but the goal of diversion has been totally achieved. we are talking about big tack and the continued patter

made, we now know from the "new york post" the source of that whole idea were rudy giuliani and steve bannonrudy giuliani in particular, long known to have associated with the ukrainian lawmaker andre who is an operative on behalf of the russians and who was emailing precisely this kind of information to people in the government, particularly the ranking member of the intelligence committee, devin nunes, and so i have not seen the evidence that makes this case, you know, beyond any conceivable doubt, but when you consider who's involved here, when you consider that this is precisely the playbook that they ran in the last go-around, it is -- i would approach mr. radcliff's statement with a great deal of skepticism. >> "the washington post," congressman, as you know, reported the other day that president trump was actually warned that russia was trying to use rudy giuliani for its own influence operations. is it plausible that the director of national intelligence would be unaware of that concern? >> that is certainly not plausible. you know, that sort of warning made to the president of the u

with inspector cluso, with an indicted steve bannon, they found this.ble story. on the other side is the skepticism from even fox news. that before the story was in the new york post last week, this is from media. fox news was first approached by rudy giuliani to report on a tranche of files alechblged to have come from hunter biden's laptop. the news division chose not to run the story unless or until the sourcing and veracity of emails could be properly vetted. so when you look at how dubious this is, anyone that has seen 15 minutes of sean hannity knows what a big deal that reporting is. so my question for you john heilemann, isn't just what do we do with this? i think jeremy has made clear we shouldn't look at it as anything other than a russian disinformation operation. butp even if you're open to it, the substance of it is still the story of joe biden loving his son as he struggled. >> yeah, well let's add one thing to your account there, nicolle, which is many the most extraordinary thing. that fox news passed on it is big. the new york post, whi

the reagan administration, and they've been influential and had influential members for decades, steve bannonellyanne conway was a member. as you mentioned, leonard leo, who was the president's outside judicial adviser is a member. ginny thomas. and then there's whole cadres of people that most of us have never heard of but who were extremely important in the conservative movement. so they are influential. it's that road to judge exactly. we can say for certain that from the videos they bragged about having a direct influence on this election of people to run the federal agencies, which i thought was surprising. i thought they would at least talk about it. but in the videos they talked about coordinating with the white house, tactically select people who were loyalists and to try to push out people who might question some of the trump administration's activities. >> i guess though my question simply is, before i let you go, have they always been conspiracy theorists or did they become more so after a donald trump presidency who has notoriously been a conspiracy theorist? >> it's hard to know.

mine, jerry of "the wall street journal" has a new become out and he describes the moment where steve bannono later becomes a key political advisor to trump, meets donald trump for the first time, trying talk him into running for president in 2012 and he says you quantity really run on these old republican ideas. you have to run as a populist and trump says it's a popularrist. and bannon realizes that's exactly how trump sees it. it's all about him. but you guys point out in the book that we have had other populist moments in our history, somewhat around the time of the andrew jackson, the progressive era at the beginning of the 20th century, to some degree during the great depression, but we had a government that was sort of capable of dealing with these citizen passions. could you sort of walk us through our own country's history with populism. >> well, i can take a stab at it. one of the main themes of our book is that populism is an expression of dissatisfaction with real problems in society in modern times it's the disbankruptcy of the globalizeddation and technological change and immig