country grill in their submittal to you, submitted a document that stated the range of what we do.it has some important information in there. we work withm(( mi we work with 250 different small businesses a week. we employ over a hundred people in san francisco. part of our business model is what is placing trucks and programming trucks in public spaces. ñ?ñ? there is a bitenñ?ñ?ñ xvñ?ñ?of history. there's akú to this board.; restaurant association in the area. at the time there was a distance of 300 feet required for notice. as a result of an error in noticing by dpw we agreed to an adjustment no our footprint. we agreed to move to mid-block and in light of5knÑ the impact and the opposition from the neighborhood association, and the number of restaurants in the area >> sorry to interrupt you. we're having trouble with the screen. >> job security. >> thank you. please continue >> these are actually the two documents that we used in the original hearing. as a way of finding accommodation for the impact we have in that area on monday, wednesday and friday. we moved further to the mid

in addition we intend on making an online submittal process, available to the public so anybody from whatever their background is who has an interest and being considered for being appointed to the waterfront plan working group and or the waterfront plan working teams. will be able to submit their own submittal to the support staff so we can catalog all of those that are interested, and other suggestion we get from the board of supervisors, and candidates we can take into consideration, before the plans groups and advisory team our proposal, is to take the summer to run through the whole recruitment process that would involve shifting the schedule on the waterfront plan update back by a couple of months, last month we proposed we start in july, we're now proposing we move that back at start it mid to late september. to do this recruitment process, to get the waterfront plan working group, and as vise ree teams put into place. in broad part that's what i actually think i just went through the whole one throughout shifting through the slide i apologize for that. i think i hit all of my

to ask for treating everybody equally and the package incomplete it is a process and the form of submittal as a commission i'll have to vote no such as all to expend my support. >> commissioner moore i'd like to ask you to be specific but with the intent of streamlining some of the small cus what specifically you want to be included with you don't want a small business to go into dope dope dive and go future and spend more than they have to after all they're a small business. >> be specific. >> for the drawings it is nothing being asked out of the ordinary for some the applications move into dbi we're not asking other than informational visual reference project we don't have in front of us not out of the ordinary. >> a second fog continue? okay seen we'll call the motion to approval on that motion commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore no commissioner richards commissioner wu and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes 6 to one with commissioner moore vociferating against and place you on item 8 grant avenue this is

guy can give you more details i'll confident an accurate submittal only june fourlt fourth and obviously want everyone to be in attention but we'll all benefit but leave the final date to this commission we should a date. >> commissioners for clarity commissioner antonini made a motion to june 4th i don't hear a second. >> >> commissioner richards. >> i agree mr. sanchez a date w is appropriate i think we had a hearing on a matter a week or two ago we set a date people came back from i understand so it is a little bit jerking around the public if we don't make a diet for sure have everybody here i think july 2nd and commissioners on that motion commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero. >> on the surveillance continue to the same date one ab. >> commissioners under our consent calendar remove 3 from consent and three and four we'll hear that at the beginning the calendar commissioners consideration the approval of

submittal doesn't rove a sex ejection.re required to register as a sex offender that process will continue even if your record has been cleared, however, other forms of royalties maybe eligible. we look forward to helping you move forward with your life ♪ ♪ so, now you know a little bit more about the program we encourage you to apply go the sf purifying purifying.org or stop by any place for our clean slate program. our team looks forward to serving >> hi. welcome to san francisco. stay safe and exploring how you can stay in your home safely after an earthquake. let's look at common earthquake myths. >> we are here at the urban center on mission street in san francisco. we have 3 guest today. we have david constructional engineer and bill harvey. i want to talk about urban myths. what do you think about earthquakes, can you tell if they are coming in advance? >> he's sleeping during those earthquakes? >> have you noticed him take any special? >> no. he sleeps right through them. there is no truth that i'm aware of with ha

from community stakeholders who could not be present today, we have those letters here for your submittal. >> i got it. thanks. okay. thanks my name is cathy mothin i'm the director of the yerba buena district. thank you for letting us present on the neighborhood. i will not read this to you, i hope that makes you happy, and we will hit the highlights of the presentation. -- property owners, back in 2008 for a seven year term, our organization will cease to exist, and stop at the end of the year if we're not reknewed. in june 2013 to seek renewal we began the process at that time the organization basically is to improve the quality of life who visit and study in the neighborhood and we focus on a few key areas, i will reference in a moment these are the existing boundaries i will show you them amendment tarly we have 172 acres i thought i would start by just highlighting some of the results we have had since we have been in existence for the last seven years, i'm not going to read these to you, basically, we have a clean team community guys and sfpd bike patrol focused in our neighborhood

submittal doesn't rove a sex ejection. if you're required to register as a sex offender that process will continue even if your record has been cleared, however, other forms of royalties maybe eligible. we look forward to helping you move forward with your life ♪ ♪ so, now you know a little bit more about the program we encourage you to apply go the sf purifying purifying.org or stop by any place for our clean slate program. our team looks forward to serving that makes me really happy that we're reaching beyond the younger generation we're also helping those that are older. and since launch we've received a lot of press and some awards so if you will allow me the opportunity to go through some of this with you the mayor put out a press release and the the chronicle did an article on us and we received a spark award that's prestigious in the design world and the california governor's office recognized us and the harvard kennedy school recognized us as a bright idea in government innovation and last but not least we were nom

. >> upon request they've submittal i'm reading from the amnesty program under the determination of the will accessibility does the anyone else establishment submit to the planning department everything for the finding under subsection b on behalf of that's the is what. >> the requirements in the bulletin. >> the upper part. >> correct. >> so the planning department would check again, whether the dpw requirements are met correct. >> they will check to make sure for instance, in their functioning before january 19th that the business license was received from january 19th, etc. the planning department is checking using those documents to make sure their complying with the amnesty program. >> so the clearance of the dpw as of those conditions may not be acceptable to the planning department potentially because they've gone through the dpw and successfully gone through that process. >> in terms of the - >> the compliance with those conditions probably can you have a turn out down from the planning department and if they don't comply with the requirements potentially. >> okay. the these com

sanchez put in his e-mail he was refer to the consolidated permit i've added documentation in my submittal i apologize. i said that in front of you we remember in front of you in january with regard to the pending issue that is in front of you with the overarching concept the issue what does this article

. >> upon request they've submittal i'm reading from the amnesty program under the determination of the will accessibility does the anyone else establishment submit to the planning department everything for the finding under subsection b on behalf of that's the is what. >> the requirements in the bulletin. >> the upper part. >> correct. >> so the planning department would check again, whether the dpw requirements are met correct. >> they will check to make sure for instance, in their functioning before january 19th that the business license

. >> this simultaneously submittal it come in with the modifications in the variance so if the board wants to see the plans without the elevator and i did rear deck that was removed prior to the hearing they've over there and feel free to ask me questions i know on the variance appeal i'm going to be belief to summarize from the last hamburger the project open an irregular undersized lot if you can get the projector what you see is the rear building wall the new building actually sets back but with the building here's the adjacent building to the left the subject property and the next building is pulled in more this is averaging kind of runs with the street sngz on a regular the elevator pop auto and the rear deck is removed so the floor area is consistent with the surrounding building two floors below grade was because of the set back the floors are acquit small you're looking on the screen right now at the very bottom floor a one bedroom you if you look to the right two small bedrooms it is a small house single-family home like i said this project is dental to the one in january th

submittal doesn't rove a sex ejection.re required to register as a sex offender that process will continue even if your record has been cleared, however, other forms of royalties maybe eligible. we look forward to helping you move forward with your life ♪ ♪ so, now you know a little bit more about the program we encourage you to apply go the sf purifying purifying.org or stop by any place for our clean slate program. our team looks forward to serving gov. the sound producing devices approval of the minutes important may 5. >> motion to approve > all in favor, say i. > i. > thank you communications directors i have no one introduction by board members of new business. >> item 7 director's report. >>

submittal doesn't rove a sex ejection.re required to register as a sex offender that process will continue even if your record has been cleared, however, other forms of royalties maybe eligible. we look forward to helping you move forward with your life ♪ ♪ so, now you know a little bit more about the program we encourage you to apply go the sf purifying purifying.org or stop by any place for our clean slate program. our team looks forward to serving . >> >> america and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all roll call please commissioner makras commissioner cohen commissioner bridges commissioner driscoll commissioner meiberger commissioner paskin-jordan commissioner stansbury is out of town we have quorum great, thank you i will continue item number 3 the minutes of march 11 4r7d i'd like them to come back and spell all the amendments at that time rfp for the hedge fund more

. >> and wungs you don't have to submittal your name more public comment. >> hi thank you for lettinge speak again one the things that thought touched on as far as the commissioners report reaching out and partnering with the port and us i know the port is working hard they're trying to market themselves out of on a regional basis to get all kinds of different cargos coming out our port areas so we've had an opportunity to partner with peter daily and jim mahoney we are going to continue to outreach on those opportunities it is our hope that if there's any you kind of cargo we'll be able to bring it broad we were lucky to go with them and perhaps bring that opportunity if possible so not everything fits together in a perfect way but you know we're having a great opportunity with the port trying to figure out how that his fit together thank you very much. >> hi mel vin local 10 i had an opportunity to go to san diego the last time i spoke we spoke about the being dormant i'd like to see a p m a company come into powering 80 with the iou but they do love you are talking about in la and

commission took 15 votes by the recommendations of planning staff the coordinating votes are in the submittal which included in our packet for today is here hearing we voted in fefrmz or terms of the short-term rentals from 90 to hundred and 20 and removing the hosting and non-he heftd definition and pro bono the ellis act for 5 years and including one hundred feet to a designation of parties and direct the mayor to set up a short-term rental office with the tax collector and the department of the building inspection for the registry program the commission didn't vote in favor of the posting of a listing without saying they're in good standing and requiring the registry to provide the data to the city how many nights the you are talking about is rent and expanding the right of action within hundred feet of private property that concludes my remarks i'll be happy to answer any questions i'm joined by john ramming and emily rogers and scott sanchez the zoning administrator thank you. >> thank you very much next speaker budget analyst. >> oh, i had a. >> - sorry supervisor campos. >> thank you,

in written submittal on page 6 you suggest that the permit holder and/or his representatives have been encouraged and permitted to give access to board members to discuss the case prior to the hearing. would you care to substantiate that please? >> since daniel bornstein, the attorney for the other side, never addressed that issue, he had every opportunity chairman lazarus, i didn't bring the items to show the fact that they were in contact with board members. i was told that i could not be in contact with board members. i believe that his representatives for the permit holder have contacted people from the commission and i was specifically told i couldn't. yes, and that's why i placed it in that brief to you. >> but you have nothing to substantiate? >> not today, no but i addressed what daniel borgstein addressed of the board members and addressed in the brief. >> are you telling me that no one has? >> i can speak for myself on that matter. >> okay. >> you are an articulate individual, by mental recall what points of fact would you have for that allegation. >> that people spoke here t

realized i could have watched the meetings is there discussion provided by over-the-counter, versus submittal plans? i see some where in the presentation or in the package we recognize that possibly, why we're getting a big surplus is because we're getting efficient with the large projects a lot of projects are application submitted over the count ear counter. is there any of that into the decision? >> over study, it says we do it -- the cost is less. >> correct. >> true. >> do we factor that into our study? >> so mgt, the consultant did not factor into the study he used that one of the reasons why costs are low, but as randy had said before shg the whole purpose of that study is if you bring in 15, the idea you should spend 15. so he identified a couple of things, if you look at the back of the report you will also see that dbi fees are a lot lower than places even though we're collecting a lot of money. all of that the purpose of the fee study is to say you are not supposed to be bringing in significantly more than what you are -- >> exactly, what i'm wondering is most of the over-the-count

submittal doesn't rove a sex ejection. if you're required to register as a sex offender that process will continue even if your record has been cleared, however, other forms of royalties maybe eligible. we look forward to helping you move forward with your life ♪ ♪ so, now you know a little bit more about the program we encourage you to apply go the sf purifying purifying.org or stop by any place for our clean slate program. our team looks forward to serving good afternoon everyone. thank frz coming this afternoon. this is public safety and nairfbd service committee of san francisco board of supervisors. it is thursday may 7th, 2015. from sfgtv we are televised by scot wiseman and gym smith. the clerk is mr. evans. >> silence ocell phones and [inaudible] should be submit today the clerk. items acted upon will appear on may 19 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated >> we have 2 items, the first is hearing on development of city college of san francisco and the second is a waver of sth banner fee at loten altern

briefs caused me to do a double take at the project given the concerns that were raised of the plan submittals and the concerns raised about the design of the project. i wanted to make sure that our staff had made the appropriate call on this. and asked our residential design team to take a second look at this. and they did so and maintained their support of the project in regards to the design concerns and the height. they expressed there was a varying pattern, irregular pattern of tall and short buildings. you have buildings of varying heights and rhythmic pattern and felt that the height was appropriate for the project. and regarding the set-back for the adjacent property at 922 carolina, there is no setback, and a building wall. and the belief it's two lots together and developed as one. and that was sufficient space on that property to provide light and air for that building itself. and that no kind of concessions were needed from an adjacent property in order to respect light and air for that property. those are the responses from the rdt on that and in response to some concerns and mrs.

. >> and kos to the over 300 caronists, want-tbe w tonists who took the risk and submitt cartoons. >>, simpson and the her man pled io the parki lot in a da-colored sedan but were blocked by a pli offir. the o were wearing bult-pro ves a heavily am when they got o of the sar -car and started shoing. adith his pistol he st both mn dead. >> did what he was supposed do did a very about job and probably sad lives. > a the live steam swed the mont inside when ty heard gnfire. scitmoved th a secure location and none was hurt. simon st this twe just hoursefe e shooting with te #texasatck pledgg his allegiance isis. ad t texas authories say it i clear that the suspects went tohat ent with hopes of juring op d definitely shoong them. btheonly maged to shoot one person a schl resource offer tat rson wasnjured in the lgndre sd to be doing jst fine tonight. adn the meanme wh the f.b.i. tcking o of the sscts for years, questions arewirng similar, how they gt is far in the fit plac lfe in the satelli center shaie llmfor cnl 6 "con news." >> all rig, thank you. >>>ack in ts area the nrtast extenon w

sanchez put in his e-mail he was refer to the consolidated permit i've added documentation in my submittal i apologize. i said that in front of you we remember in front of you in january with regard to the pending issue that is in front of you with the overarching concept the issue what does this article try to accomplish as amended in 2014 that was making sure no loss of affordable dwelling unit and the value in march of 2012 was one .342 and the threshold was increased i'm sure you're aware of the marketed went up so by the time the merger was passed by the discretionary review the new threshold applied and the appraisals we're not asking for a waiver we can substantially apply we submitted an prevail that's not an appeal a marketing letter. >> but a period of time where the planning department said from a letter to the project sponsors architect we're not going to look at that when the noticed of restriction the 6 months had gone the important part an appraisal was submitted that had the time period in which the planning department detailed it, in fact two months after the date and quit

submittal doesn't rove a sex ejection.re required to register as a sex offender that process will continue even if your record has been cleared, however, other forms of royalties maybe eligible. we look forward to helping you move forward with your life ♪ ♪ so, now you know a little bit more about the program we encourage you to apply go the sf purifying purifying.org or stop by any place for our clean slate program. our team looks forward to serving