the issue was raised in two specialized commissions and the supreme commission. one of the strategies of the national media is to follow all major policies. a bag that is worthy of training a skill that was not taken into account in the expert discussions that were conducted, and finally a vote was taken both in the specialized commission and in the high commission, where all the members were present, thank god, this matter was approved and we received a vote of non-compliance. the vote of non-compliance actually means that the program the 7th plan of the 7th program in the skill training department, those topics that i think the supreme leader of the revolution and the policies announced were not followed very much. it is a detailed discussion that cannot take up your time i will take this detailed explanation very much because i have to point it out , but fortunately what was approved was that the government of the parliament was obliged to rewrite the seventh program in the parliament . the proposed bill that is desired by the organization should be presented

the issue was raised in two specialized commissions and the supreme commission . alan, as it should be , skill training has not been paid attention to in the discussion. the examination that was done and finally the opinion of the specialized commission it was taken and also in the high commission, when all the members were present, thank god, this matter was approved, and we got a vote of non-compliance. and the communicated policies were not observed very much. now, what areas are you following? because i have to mention other discussions, but fortunately, what to what was approved was that the government of the parliament was obliged to rewrite the seventh plan. in fact , this issue was raised in the parliament, and what they recommended was to present a proposed bill that is desired by the organization, and this attachment becomes the seventh plan. thank god, this happened, one of the significant measures that was done last year , and this is for the whole country. some of my dear people and colleagues may pay attention to the amendment of the organization's st

determine the expediency of the system , the issue was raised in 2 specialized commissions and the supreme commission , and we brought the reasons for justification , which i think are based on the policies announced by the supreme leader of the revolution. one of the policies of the national media is to follow these big policies as it should be and skill training is not taken into account in discussions. the examination was done and in the end voting was done both in the specialized commission and in the high commission where all the members are present. this issue was approved and we received a vote of non-compliance. the vote of non-compliance actually means that the 7th grand plan of the 7th plan in the skill training section of the subjects that i think the supreme leader of the revolution and the announced policies have not been followed very much. you are following us, we have explained the whole to you , but now there are different parts, which i have now explained is a detailed discussion that will take up a lot of your time. fortunately, what was approved was that the government and the par

judge, the career growth of a judge from one instance to another also occurs through the supreme qualification commissionrtant body, from which it directly depends on who our judges are, in which judicial positions. the powers of the previous members of the higher-ranking commission were granted in november 2019 after amendments were made to the law of ukraine on the judiciary and status judges and other provisions regarding the activities of judicial governance bodies. and only in july of the 21st year, president zelenskyi resumed work in the bks with a new law. however , due to russia's full-scale war against ukraine, the competitive selection of commission members could only be started in the fall of 2022. and only on june 1, 2023, the vkks was fully formed. with the help of a competition commission, which included three ukrainian judges, a prosecutor from the netherlands and two retired judges from canada and the united states of america. within the scope of its activity, avtomaidan assisted the competition committee in the analysis of candidates, we analyzed a huge number of candidates, we are glad

well , there are 28 applicants for the vacant position of a member of the supreme qualification commissionf judges, among the candidates are judges of the supreme court, the supreme anti-corruption court, a judge of the court of appeal, a judge of local judges and a retired judge. vacant position appeared in the ccc after the judge of the kyiv court of appeals, roman ignatov, resigned on march 27 at his own request. he held the position of the chairman of the central committee of the central committee of the russian federation. the competition is ongoing, the selection of members of the vkks. is carried out by a competition commission consisting of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. foreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. updated in 2022 as part of the judicial reform , the supreme council of justice still does not work in full force. out of 21 members of the vrp, there are currently 17. it has a quorum and the selection of its members is ongoing. the collegial body of the state power and the judicial government. which is re

the fact is that president biden himself came to office and stood up a commission to investigate whether to change the supremethis morning the president thanked this commission for its insightful analysis that supposedly informed his reform prop proposals. never mind now, never mind that this commission, cochaired by one of his closest political confidantes, didn't actually recommend that he do anything. on the contrary. it explained in detail the challenges posed by hare-brained idea like term limits. as one member noted, quote, we ought to be really careful about tinkering with the supreme court, because you don't know what the consequences could be. why is the biden-harris administration so willing to put the crown jewel of our system of government, the independent judiciary, to the torch? because it stands in their way. don't take my word for it. they're running ads about it, pictures of the justices on screen. one commercial intones that the supreme court has made the president above the law because the former president asked them to. what happened to respecting court decisions? the biden-harris justice

taking your own time, this is the decision of the supreme stock exchange council, our main thing is to work for a bachelor's degree in the specialized commission of the supreme stock exchange council and the supreme stock exchange council itself, it is our will, after all these companies also know that we for two decades , we have held the shares of adelt. the assemblies of these companies have never been held . they said that in 1400 , there was some interruption due to the corona issues, but it seems to me that it was a very good performance and a good diagnosis was made. this is the recent meeting of the supreme council. the stock market , which was last week, was about dalt stock issues in particular, a report was presented to the congregation. we hope that with the efforts of the congregation, the decision that was not made to extend it is not for the time being. my opinion is that you should keep in mind the meetings and topics that you are behind the schedule . it is behind the schedule, but overall, i think it is satisfactory. after all, there are resistances in those boards of directors not to hold it. as you said, we have companies.

the supreme court fellows commission supports talented individuals to work with one enforce judicial agencies in washington d.c. those supreme court of the united states and the judicial center commission. all fellows have it administration policy development and education and benefit city to write in which they can develop academic research agenda. wonderful to see somebody fellows that i saw so many of you a lot over in 2024 -- 25. the class is special for this year's past work talented for walking into the building in my phrase is all for one and one for. they've adopted other duties to decide because many times for those agencies but you never know each day is going to bring and it's been wonderful where they are needed so let me tell you a little bit about each one of them. the judicial center and education research agency in the federal courts and strength the fellows program in the u.s. district court in district of connecticut the honorable, i know adams future boss is sitting right in front of me. all right, the bright lights are here. he got a good home to go to his managing

supreme court. the dobbs decision two years ago. he had a commission take a look at the supreme court. reciated the commission and the work they have done. when you have the supreme court -- and the president, actually, gave examples of what the decision of immunity that they made recently, what it means for the president of the united states. what we're seeing right now is not normal. majority of americans agree with us. what we are seeing at the supreme court is not normal. the president spoke to that at length. he went to the lbj library because of the historic nature of that library, the 60th anniversary of the civil rights act. and there is so much here that is at stake. that's why he wanted to do this. this is about the right thing to do. it's about meeting the moment we are in. it's about reacting to what scotus did. he said in his op-ed american democracy was founded on the rule of law. no one, not the president or the supreme court are above the law. in the wake of the supreme court's ruling, for example, it grants presidents amenities for crimes committed in office and got its

the independent who one of the supreme court justices left commission. he was replaced by a republic then. and no one, i think, on this call has ever heard of president samuel j. tilden. so you know how this went. garfield like all the republicans on the commission, voted for. hayes and hayes, despite losing the popular vote, became the 19th president. hayes, however, had said during his campaign in 1876, even before the disputed election, that he would only served one term if he had won. so the knew in 1880 they were going to need another candidate. and so a lot republicans were interested in getting that nomination. in 1880, there were some whispers out there that james garfield might be a good compromise if if no front runner emerged. but very few people put a lot of stock in that, including james garfield. but then garfield is able to win the nomination in 1880. he's the classic dark horse candidate. tell us how he actually is able to win the nomination. sure. yeah so garfield, in fact, goes to the republican national convention in chicago in 1880. n

he had a supreme court commission come out with effectively -- no recommendations. said supreme court term limits made sense. chief justice roberts when he worked in the reagan white house said that term limits made sense. he said 15 years, though, 18 is the going rate. justice alito said during his confirmation if he was at the convention he would have done life tenure or long term. justice kagan as well. this is an idea from the left, right, ending life tenure at the court is popular. i don't know why the lawmakers on the republican side are not with their base. just out of curiosity i went to the 2016 iowa primaries and spoke to folks and heard from them saying that. the folks on the ground said they wanted to end life tenure at the supreme court. it's become more popular on the left in the intervening years. if you think of term limits at large, that's a very conservative idea. bringing -- not having life long politicians, not having life long judges in robes deciding what we the people want to do. there's nothing scary about it. it's what every modern democracy

supreme court fellows commission selects for talented individuals to work for one of four federal judicial agencies for a year-long appointment here in washington dc. the agencies are the supreme court of the united states, the administrative office of the u.s. court federal judicial center and the u.s. sentencing commission. all fellows gain practical experience in judicial administration policy development and education. they also benefit from time to study and write an advantage point in which they can develop an academic research agenda as well. so wonderful to see so many of our fellows alumni saw some of you on the walk over in the audience today and also the finalists for our 2024/25 fellows class. every class of alfellows are special but this year's class i want to tell you is composed of exceptional individuals who are talented lawyers and goodhearted humans. i can see them walking all the time into our building and sometimes even encounter them over the administrative office and my phrase for them is all for one and one for all they are so supportive of each other and also adopte

as soon as i came into office, i could meet with a bipartisan congressional commission on the supremeourt in the united states, comprised of meeting with constitutional scholars, liberal and conservative, to provide recommendations on potential reforms to the court. i have been careful in these deliberations, because these are serious decisions. in the face of increasing threats to american democratic institutions, i used the commission's analysis and today i am calling for three bold reforms to restore trust and accountability to the court and our democracy. as i got off air force one, the republican speaker of the house said whatever he proposes is dead on arrival. i think his thinking is dead on arrival. [applause] first, in calling for a constitutional amendment called no one is above the law amendment. [cheers and applause] i mean it sincerely. there is no immunity for crimes a former committed while in office. i share -- [no audio] our -- i share -- [applause] our founder's belief that the president is equal under the law. we are a nation of laws, not kings and dictators. [appla

judicial reform, the composition of the higher qualification commission was given titanic tasks and responsibilities, however , all members of the supremelifications committee went to high positions consciously and of their own volition, so we hope that the commission will be able to restore a high level of efficiency. and for today i have everything, it was judicial control and i, tetyana shustrova. if you know facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report about... an unscrupulous judge who makes illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to the e-mail address you see on the screen. all right, see you soon. in a week. vasyl zima's big broadcast. my name is vasyl zima, this is a big broadcast on the espresso tv channel. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time. my colleagues and i will talk about the most important things. two hours to learn about the war, about the military, front, component. serhiy zgurets. but how does the world live? yuri fizer is already in front of me and it's time to talk about what happened outside ukraine. two hours to keep up with economic news, time to talk about money under time of

supreme council of the stock exchange, the result is one. there is a one-year bachelor's degree in the specialized commission of the supreme stock exchange council the supreme stock exchange council itself. we have the will. after all, these companies also know that we have been in the sky for two decades. we had never held the meetings of these companies . they said that in 1400 there was some interruption due to the corona issues, but it seems to me that it was a very good performance and a good diagnosis was made . a report was also presented about the issues of justice shares, especially the community . it should be in the heart of mr. mousavi's meetings and issues that you are behind the schedule. yes, you are behind the schedule, but overall, in my opinion, it is satisfactory. finally, there are resistances in the board of directors is not to hold an audit, since as you said, we have companies that have no financial statements for years. after all, it will take some time to coordinate these things, you need a budget , you will open them once , what was the biggest obstacle, if this delay that happened was supposed to be done by september,

number of justices on the supreme court i spoke to bob bauer who sat on the president's supreme court reform commissione said that court expansion would further erode the public confidence in the supreme court. >> i don't think that there is much of a future to the proposals for court expansion. i think on the merits there are more negatives than positives. we saw support for term limits and away we did not see for court expansion or court packing from left and right democrats and republicans, quite wide support reflected in the record we created for the commission. laura: has he said, there is much more bipartisan support for term limits for justices it also recently justice kagan acknowledged that there should be a binding code of ethics for justices but the enforcement mechanism is the thing justice kagan said would be difficult, saying potentially it could be lower court judges that end up enforcing them. geoff: is this something vice president harris will champion? laura: it is. vice president harris quickly endorsed this after the president released the proposal. she said quote, these popular ref

about legacy for president biden he began his administration by appointing a bipartisan commission on the supreme court that commissioner been produce nearly 300 page report at the end of his first year in office. that's been sitting on the shelf and they did very detailed studies on things like term limits and an ethics code for those justices. so the president certainly had a lot of material to draw from in making this decision. and we've also now been told that vice president harris was deeply involved in deciding how and what to propose today however, unrealistic it may be, jake. >> thank kayla, vice president harris is going to return to the campaign trail tomorrow morning. after announcing a staggering fundraising haul, what's on her schedule well, we know that she'll be delivering a rally in georgia. >> this second in two weeks. seeks that we are expecting to be a very high energy of fare, much like her first campaign rally in milwaukee, wisconsin was last week notable about her return to georgia after going to battleground wisconsin last week, is that it's a state that really became out o

much, two judges in one family, these are all questions from commission to mykhalyuk, so without further clarification, the members of the supremert decided that the candidate was suitable for the position of a judge and recommended her to the lyubachiv district court of the odesa region. the composition of the higher qualification commission, updated within the framework of the judicial reform , was entrusted with titanic tasks and responsibilities. however, all members of the central committee of the central committee went to the high position consciously and of their own volition, so we hope that the commission will be able to restore a high level of efficiency. and for today i have everything, it was judicial control and i, tetyana shustrova. if you know the facts corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report an unscrupulous judge who makes wrongful decisions, write to me on facebook or by email. whose address you see on the screen. it's all good, we'll meet in exactly one week. it is believed that in ukraine people under the age of 25 are not mobilized, except for volunteers, but in reality this is not the case.

he rebuffed those calls when running for president in 2020, promising to put together a supreme court commissionhey gave him a nearly 300-page report and it sort of just sat there collecting dust on the proverbial bookshelf and he hasn't done much at all with regard to the court besides criticize it at times after decisions. this would be a major shift from the president in the final months of this campaign. >> i interviewed him a year ago and he had comments comments that reflected what you're saying right now. i think one of the things that your reporting suggests this changes the court and the political wins would certainly be at president joe biden's back on this. i mean, 60% of all americans according to gallop disapprove of this supreme court, 73% of americans supported roe v. wade. the immunity decision hasn't been polled widely but a vast majority of americans believe no one should be above the law. there is a tectonic shift in the makeup of the court, its willingness to buck precedent and their own commitments rhetorically at least in their confirmation hearings and the public sentiment

the selection of members of the supreme court of ukraine is carried out by a competitive commission consisting of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. foreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. updated in 2022 as part of the judicial reform , the supreme council of justice still does not work in full force. out of 21 members, the vrp currently has 17, has a quorum, and the selection of its members is ongoing. the collegial body of the state government and of judicial governance, which is responsible for the honesty and transparency of the entire judicial corps, independence and professionalism of judges and prosecutors, consists of ten persons elected by the congress of judges of ukraine. two are appointed by the president, two are elected by the verkhovna rada, two more by the congress of lawyers, two are delegated by the all-ukrainian conference of prosecutors, and two more are elected by the congress of scientists and representatives of legal higher education institutions. currently, there is no one in the vrp under the quota of t

to october 7th, there is the demand by the people of israel to create a national commission of inquiry heavy by supreme court judge that not in your reviews is to create but i think that there is no denial that 3000 palestinians across the border from gaza into israel on october 7th, and committed atrocities went through and open the air and use it to dance festival and murder. 340 people, burn people in their homes. a large children in front of the apparently some parents in front of joe 3 up at the end of the evidence is the full of the young girls with which is invited on this show will invite him on for work. so this is really paper. i read, i mean your particularly interesting to speak to because of your past as regards negotiation to piece. because i think that is a big mistake to try and cover over the atrocities committed by as a mess the most cross more a red lines on october 7th. it should never be crossed. just as israel has been crossing more, we learned we need to, we need to see the inquiry that you were calling for the net and the i was not allowing to, but you were involved in a piece d

to october 7th, there is the demand by the people of israel to create a national commission of inquiry heavy by supreme court judge that not in your reduces to create. but i think that there is no denial that 3000 palestinians across the border from gaza into israel on october, 2nd, and committed atrocities went through and open the air and use it to dance festival and murder. 340 people, burn people in their homes. the large children in front of the apparently some parents in front of joe preamp at the end of the 0 evidence is the full of the young girls with which is invited on this show will invite them on for work. so this is really paper. i read, i mean your particularly interesting to speak to because of your past as regards negotiation to piece. because i think that is a big mistake to try and cover over the atrocities committed by unless we have the most cross maureen red lines on october 7th. it should never be crossed. just as israel has been crossing more, we learned we need to, we need to see the inquiry that you were calling for the net and the i was not allowing to, but you were involved

supreme court. joining me now is the president and ceo of citizens for responsibility and ethics in washington, and a professor at the university of chicago law school. she was a member of the presidential commission on the u.s. supreme court and is also the author of the book, union, commerce, and slavery in the age of federalism. thank you for joining us. let me start with you. where do you stand on some of the many reforms we mentioned? we kind of group them together, but they are very different. there are different ways to approach them. installing an ethics code, establishing term limits. what you believe can be done? what you believe should be done? >> we start with the fact that something needs to be done, that it is simply not working to have the supreme court police themselves. it doesn't work to have anybody police themselves, especially people with tremendous, tremendous power. i think as a starting point a rigorous congressional investigation has to happen and you know we have seen new ethics problems uncovered. the senate uncovered private airfare trips paid for, that justice thomas took, paid for by billionaires. so that needs to keep happening and the calls for a special counsel to

as soon as i came to office, i can be a bipartisan commission of the supreme court of the united statessed of the scholars both liberal and conservative to divide recommendations and potential reforms to the court. i've been careful in these liberations, because they are serious serious decisions. and in the threats to american democratic institutions i use the commission's analysis, and today i'm calling for three bold reforms to assert trust and accountability to the court in our democracy. as the press shouted, republican speaker said, whatever he proposes is dead on arrival. but i think his thinking is dead on arrival. [applause] first, when calling for a constitutional amendment, called no one is above the law. it holds! i mean this sincerely, it holds to know immunity for crime a former president committed while in office. i share -- our founders belief that a president must answer to the law. the president is accountable in the exercise of the great power of the presidency. we are nation of laws, not kings and dictators! [applause] the decision can be boiled down to a case, trump

most important body of the judicial system of the higher qualification commission of judges of ukraine. prior to that, the supreme almost four years, and this was a big challenge for the functioning of the country's judicial system. in composed of 16 members of the supreme judicial council, is responsible for the formation of the judicial corps, for the transfer of judges from one court to another, as well as for ensuring their proper level. in particular, it conducts qualification evaluations of judges and submits a recommendation on appointment to the supreme council of justice. candidate for the position of judge. the career growth of a judge from one instance to another also takes place through the higher qualification commission of judges, that is, it is a very important body that, from which direction, depends on who our judges are, in which judicial positions. the powers of the previous members of the commission were terminated in november 2019, after amendments were made to the law of ukraine on the judiciary and the status of judges and other provisions on the activities of judicial governance bodies. an

commission of judges. among the candidates are judges of the supreme court, the high anti-corruption court, a judge of the court of appeal, judges of local judges and retired judges. vacant position. appeared in the vkk after a member of the vkk with a judicial quota, judge kyivskyi, voluntarily resigned on march 27 roman ignatov of the court of appeal. he held the position of the chairman of the central committee of the central committee of the russian federation. the competition is ongoing, the selection of members of the vkks is carried out by a competition commission consisting of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. foreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. in 2022, as part of the judicial reform, the supreme council of justice still does not work in its full complement of 21 members of the vrp, currently there are 17, it has a quorum , and the selection of its members is ongoing. a collegial body of state power and judicial governance, which is responsible for honesty and transparency of the entire judicial corps, independence and profess

among these judges, in particular 14, the new higher commission has already managed to submit qualifications. position of the supremethis is only the beginning, and now these 180 judges, obviously, do not have the position of the supreme court. ask for evaluation and will continue to judge accordingly, will continue to consider cases, continue to receive grapes and so on. among these judges, for example, there is ms. judge charcot, who is leaving her position on this principle, but in the public integrity council, which provides information about such judges, it is very clearly stated that she remained in the occupied territories and tried to become a judge of a... so-called court , which was organized by the russian federation, and such a person remains a judge in ukraine, also, for example, judge ms. izovitova vakin, she is the judge who banned the kharkiv euromaidan, according to such logic, of the supreme court, she also remains in her position and continues to administer justice, continues to live on our taxes, and now. well, that is, they all have unashamed conclusions from the public integrity council, which

clarify whether and to what percentage these structures are ready, did commissions come there, relatively speaking from the supremese defenses to see how the city is protected. today it is 20 km to the city, so from the front line, the tasks set by the military leadership, we carry them out, no more, no less, well, the rest of the information, i understand, you can’t divulge, that’s for sure, i don’t have i don’t own all the rights, i only own specifically in the city, or in the inner ring of the city, let’s say this, let’s go back to the population, tell us in general how many civilians there are now... it happens in the city, how many children are among them, that’s it to what extent do you motivate them to leave at all, in what ways, because on the website of the pokrovsk administration it is indicated that the mandatory evacuation has been ongoing since may 2, well, as i said, the city has a population of almost 60 thousand, 400 children out of 8.5 thousand , that is , half more, in addition to appeals, in addition to working with the population regarding, as they say? persuasion that they planned to leave in

will say that the issue of advertising was mainly in the advertising commission , but the guardian council also has its own supreme supervision over these issues. it has been and is. very well , thank you very much. if you allow me , i would also like to thank the dear people of our country at the end of the speech. it is necessary to always have the presence of various candidates who heated up the election and finally made this competition good, as well as their fans who finally the whole existence is finally coming from the hands of the election officials, executive agents, supervisory agents, and various monitors who finally show up without any expectations, and of course, from various security agencies, who are all really hand in hand. thank you very much, mr. tahan nazif, the honorable spokesman of the guardian council, and special thanks for your association with the first page . god bless you. we have come to determine the task of the country today by choosing our weapons, god willing. these people call their country, if there is a difference of opinion it is between us and we can solve it easily by ourselv

among these judges, in particular 14, the new higher quality commission has already managed to file a dismissal of the position of the supremert. and this is only the beginning, among, and now these 180 judges, apparently, according to the position of the supreme court, should not return for evaluation, and accordingly will continue to judge, will continue to hear cases, will continue to receive a barricade and so on, among these judges, for example, are ms. judge sharko, who is leaving her position on this principle, but in the public integrity council, which provides information. as for such judges, it is very clearly stated that she remained in the occupied territories and tried to become a judge of the so-called court organized by the russian federation, and yet such a person remains a judge in ukraine. this is also, for example, the judge ms. izovitova vakin, this is the judge who banned the kharkiv euromaidan, according to this logic, of the supreme court, she also remains with us. her position and continues to administer justice, continues to live on our taxes with you, and here now, well , that is, they all have sham

he told democrats if he was elected he would institute, or bring together, a supreme court commission to study some of these proposed reforms. they wrote a nearly 300-page report and that was it. he didn't really act on it at all. but as we've seen the supreme court move farther to the right overruling roe v. wade, this decision on trump's immunity. we've seen the public reputation and america's approval of it decline. and we've also seen the president become more critical of it and that has led to us this point where we're expecting him to finally -- democrats have long awaited for him to do this, throw his support behind some of these reforms. >> and tyler, because they haven't gotten the decisions they wanted, over the years, many progressives called for combangs on the supreme court. the president stopped short here. in what extent is this symbol ig, given the tlekhold that you laid out, 60 votes to do any of this, two thirds to actually get constitutional amendments on some of these things. so that's unlikely, given the way our congress is divided right now. so, is this sort of a

commission to mykhalyuk. thus, without further clarification, the members of the supreme court of appeals decided that the candidate was suitable for the position of judge and recommended her to the lyubashiv district court of odesa region. the composition of the higher qualification commission, updated within the framework of the judicial reform , was entrusted with titanic tasks and responsibilities. however, all members of the central committee of the communist party of ukraine went to high positions consciously and of their own free will. so we hope the commission will be able to restore. high level of efficiency. and for today, that's all i have, it was judicial control and i, tatiana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report an unscrupulous judge who makes illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to the e-mail address you see on the screen. it's all good, we'll meet in exactly one week. we are looking for 13-year-old olena and her 15-year-old brother artem yankovsky. these children lived in the kakhovsky district of the kherson region in the village of c

supreme court on monday said, yes, they are, donald trump is. >> yeah. and i think this is something that the biden white house has fallen down on the job on. i testified before the presidential commission. i think actually three years ago this week. have not heard from the white house since. i think i had one call with the vice president's office on some of these reform ideas. i'm not the one pushing the most partisan reforms. you know, term limits are supported by 70% of the public. about 60% of republicans and 80% of democrats. it's kind of surprising to me this issue that seems very winnable and my organization is a c3. we don't deal with elections. speaking as a private citizen, i believe this is a very winnable issue for democrats. we can be upset about roe or any of the immunity cases or what have you, but i just don't see a reform agenda coming from the white house. coming from leading democrats. and you know, it's going to be hard to convince voters that are going to turn up in november if you don't have a positive vision for what a future court looks like. i haven't seen that from the party that's in the white house right now. >> sky, is that part of the space that you're hopi

now the supreme court has defanged the securities and exchange commission and already -- for prosecution when we talk about other countries where leadership controls media and uses it as a piggy bank. >> all of the guardrails that were there that protected us will no longer be in place. he will no longer respect. he will make it a mean presidency. all about donald trump. it will be cruel to others and the rest of the world will mock us for whom we have elected. i was just on the white dudes were harris,. we had over 60,000 people and raised over $3 million in about 90 minutes. this issue kept coming up about bringing back corruption. something else that kept coming up was the debate and whether prosecutor kamala harris will be able to debate him. i want to say, everyone has been saying he is dodging the debate because he is scared of kamala harris who has put away others and of course we know donald is the biggest risk to the western world over the past 80 years. have we lost all civility in politics that no one's going to even ask him if he is just having a flareup of bone spurs again?

commission of judges. among the candidates for judges'. court, the supreme anti-corruption court, a judge of the court of appealdges of local judges and judges in resignation the vacant position in the ccc appeared after a member of the ccc with a judicial quota, roman ignatov, a judge of the kyiv court of appeal, voluntarily resigned on march 27. he held the position of the head of the vkk. the competition is ongoing, the selection of members of the vkks is carried out by a competition commission consisting of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. control. it is foreign experts who have a voice during the voting procedure. updated in 2022 as part of the judicial reform , the supreme council of justice still does not work in full composition out of 21 members, the vrp currently has 17. it has a quorum and the selection of its members is ongoing. the collegial body of state power and judicial governance, which is responsible for the honesty and transparency of the entire judicial corps, the independence and professionalism of judges and... consists of people, ten are elected by th