with negative conclusions of the supreme court has been working in the plenary for almost 8 years, and it was followed by both the previous and current supreme court of appealsreat chamber also recognized this. in particular, in the decision regarding ex-judge solomyanskyi district court of kyiv, maria zelinska and judge gospodarskyi. pavlo gorbasenko of the kyiv region. we counted at least five decisions of the grand chamber of the supreme court, which earlier in the same grand chamber indicated a completely different position, they indicated that it is really necessary for such a decision to be supported by the entire plenary composition of the highest qualification commission of judges, and the decision of the panel itself is not enough. the decision of the grand chamber of the supreme court contains a number of dangers for judicial reform. according to preliminary estimates, it can help about 180 judges who have already received negative conclusions from the public integrity council to remain in their positions. this is the decision of the grand chamber helps these particular 180 people now avoid this procedure and in fact they already automatically rema

judges continues, almost 2,000 representatives of local and appellate courts have to pass it, and during the first year of work, the supreme court of appeals managed to conduct only about 130 interviews, so now he is actively trying to catch up and announce verdicts, in particular, regarding those servants of themis who want to keep their positions. we will introduce you to the brightest candidates, but first to the news. the supreme council of the judiciary dismissed nataliya sharko, judge of the heniche district court of the kherson region, who sided with the occupiers and makes illegal decisions against citizens of ukraine. in particular, she arrested the ukrainian lenur khalilov, whom the russians accuse of participating in an illegal armed formation. in 2021, judge sharko sued the state judicial administration for the payment of a judge's fee. from this lawsuit it became known that sharko has access to the state. secrets, but for more than two years the judge, despite cooperation with the russian occupiers, remained a judge in ukraine and received a salary with all allowances. a video from the wedding of marina barsuk, a judge of the

of the state administrative court on non-compliance with the criteria of integrity and professional ethics. however, this did not prevent him from receiving a positive one. the decision of the supreme court of appeals, mr. krivenda also received a negative opinion from the public integrity council, and to which there were also a number of questions regarding the origin of his property and assets, and of course, it is clear that with such an approach, the presiding judge in the case has, let's say, at least biased to respectively. to this category of case, and therefore we can talk about a certain kind of such a conflict of interest, where the judge, being dissatisfied with his own conclusion of the public integrity council, is ready to play along and help other judges who have the same problem. the grand chamber of the supreme court tried to explain its decision, but did so not very convincingly. in particular, judges. they said that they were changing the practice because the legislator changed the law, and the vkk changed its own regulations. there is such a justification manipulation by the grand chamber insists in the anti-corruption center, after all. thus, with each new change in the law , de

qualification assessment of current judges: who failed the interview with the supreme court of appealsceedings were opened in relation to the property. but do all judges underestimate the value of their property? this apartment is located in a fairly old housing stock. watch the program on thursday, august 29 at 5:45 p.m judicial control with tetyana shustrova on espresso tv channel. the verkhovna rada regularly adopts new laws and. but how do these changes affect our lives? we have analyzed the new decrees to inform you about the latest changes in ukrainian legislation. how do legislative norms change our lives, what should we prepare for? leading lawyers of the aktum bar association will answer these and other questions that concern ukrainians. watch every tuesday at 7:55 in the legal expertise program on the espresso tv channel. today in the verdict with serhii program rudenkom the danger of a nuclear accident, the head of magateza. observes active hostilities near the kurdish nuclear power plant, which rafael grossi plans to discuss with volodymyr zelensky after his visit to kurshc

. and professional ethics, the panel of three members of the previous composition of the supreme court of appealsided that the judge is fit for the position. this decision was preliminary and was supposed to enter into force after consideration by the plenary composition of the vcks, that is, by its 11 members. and this is exactly what sato didn't like very much. he objected to the next review, believing that the decision of the troika about his suitability for the position was quite sufficient. judge osatiy, he indicated that in his opinion. actually, he is already recognized virtuous of course, for the judges, er, it would always be desirable that when three of my colleagues found them suitable, then so be it. continue to work, but actually, the practice, reading of the law, its interpretation was such that everyone always expected this plenary composition, for 11 people to give their opinion. vitaly usatiy went to court and the country's highest judicial body supported his position. in the anti-corruption center, they emphasize that the grand chamber of the supreme court broke its own practice

higher qualifications commission referred the judge's case to the full composition of the supreme court of appeals, which must make a final decision on his suitability for the position. and finally, we will introduce you to the judge of apostolivsk. district court proceedings for official falsification of documents, dnipropetrovsk region, natalia semenova, that a criminal case was opened before the judge , it was later closed, however, there are obviously gaps not only in integrity, but also in knowledge. criminal proceedings were opened against me, against me , the prosecutor, the prosecutor can open criminal proceedings, the investigator, what does the investigator do, i didn't understand the question, i'm sorry. the judge brought nataliya semenova to justice for the fact that she constantly returned to the police protocols about administrative violations on illegal grounds. if you pointed out to the question of the public council of integrity that the prosecutor's report was correct in itself, drawn up in accordance with the law, then what grounds were there to return it, when at the same time

supreme court tried to explain its decision, but did so not very convincingly. in particular, the judges indicated that they are changing the practice because the legislator changed the law, and the supreme court of appeals - its own regulations. such reasoning is manipulation. on the part of the grand chamber, they insist on the anti-corruption center, because in this way, with each new change in the law , the decisions made in the old edition will have to be recognized as illegal. unfortunately, we are now seeing the result of this, when, in particular, the rapporteur in the usatoy case, who had a negative conclusion of the state administrative court, adopts, well, writes a decision, the grand chamber accordingly approves, agrees, issues it, and we see a situation where they are at 180°. return the position, at the same time, very unreasonably and do not meet their own criteria, which were previously established when it is possible to change the position, because all the previous decisions were completely different in similar situations. currently , about 1,800 ukrainian judges have to pass the evaluation qualifications, including representatives of the odious oask and the pechersk district court of ky

thus, without further clarification, the members of the supreme court of appeals decided that the candidate suitable for the position of judge and recommended her to the lyubachiv district court of the odesa region. the composition of the higher qualification commission, renewed as part of the judicial reform, was entrusted with titanic tasks and responsibility, however, all the members of the ccc went to a high position consciously and of their own volition, so we hope that the commission will be able to restore a high level of efficiency. and for today i have everything, it was judicial control and i, tetyana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report about... an honest judge who makes wrongful decisions, write to me on facebook or to the e-mail address you see on the screen. it's all good, we'll meet in exactly one week. 13-year-old sofiyka storozhuk. this girl. lived on kharkiv region in the city of kupyansk, and it was there that she encountered a full-scale war. let me remind you that kupyansk was under occupation almost from the first

higher qualification commission referred the judge's case to the full composition of the supreme court of appeals, which must make the final decision decision regarding his suitability for the position. and finally, we will introduce you to natalya semenova, judge of the apostolivsky district court of the dnipropetrovsk region. as for the judge, criminal proceedings were opened for official falsification of documents. it was later closed, however, there are obviously gaps not only in integrity, but also in... criminal proceedings were opened against me, about me, me, the prosecutor, the prosecutor can open criminal proceedings, the investigator, what does the investigator do, i did not understand the question, i'm sorry, supreme council justice brought nataliya semenova to justice for the fact that she constantly returned to the police reports on administrative violations without legal grounds, if you stated in response to a question of the public integrity council that the prosecutor's report was... itself correct, drawn up in accordance with the law, then what are the grounds were to return it,

of that for years. ryan has been amazing on that. that is something i'm very excited we have live audio not just in the supreme court but every federal or of appeals on the shoulders of giants on that one. host: c-span has repeatedly asked the court to allow cameras into the courtroom to do what we do congress, show the process unfolding, uninterrupted and no mmentary. 18 year term limit for justices, enforceable code ofthics, adopt financial disclosure rules , more openness around public appearances, what do you mean? guest: a lot of the justices are appearing and we only find out about them months or years later. just like when i worked for politicians, i would say governor asked -- x, the supreme court could do that too. justice breyer is an example. if you have justice sotomayor or justice thomas speaking at the federal society or one of these other groups, it is important for the public to know about it. i think the supreme court police could manage that. the justices meeting with people in their chambers. this is the historical society. if you remember 18 months ago, the historical society was being used to get to influence the justices. him

court of appeals the court of appeals looked at it, tha' is the law yes. these tribes have two thirds of the state of maine. so of course we are all headed to the supreme court. we will see who gets two thirds of the state of maine and we get a call from the white house, jimmy carter. hello, this is president carter. you guys ought to come to the white house and let's talk this over trade the state of maine wants to talk it over. so okay, we all go to the white house the tribal leaders and we talk with the state of maine. and agreed to settle the case. instead of having one big winner one big lives of the tribes came away with a lot of land and a lot of money. i'm not two thirds but a pretty good chunk of it. lots of money for the land they had to give up. the next thing we know here comes some other eastern tribes. eastern tribes. that happened to us too. we had the same situation. one after another started representing his eastern tribes is eastern states had comeme in and took their atlanta. so one after another land claim settlements in recognition of the tribes back here as tribes. until we got a number of them back here. all of that was a result

supreme of the land. they were not ancient history. and this got appealed on the court of appeals. ventually, the us supreme court and those treaty to fish got upheld and everybody across the country came to realize that these treaties still in full force. in effect, they weren't ancient history and other tribes started filing treaty rights cases. we represented a number of them in their treaty rights cases and in a way we weren't. we had other tribes come to us that needed help to get out of what had happened to them during this termination era. some of these tribes, their tribal governments, terminated their lands, sold and everything, and this was the result of federal policy that started in the 1950s with the big communist. well, some of these people here on the hill that well, we've got a bunch of indians out that are communists, and we need to get rid of these tribes, their communal their communists. they started terminating, doing away with them. and of course, these tribes continue to be tribal people and, you know, survive in the fifties, into the sixties. then started comi

i worked with you a lot on i'm very excited we have live audio not just the supreme court but every federal court of appeals. i am standing on the shoulders of giants here on c-span on that reform. >> c-span has repeatedly asked the court to allow cameras into the courtroom to do what we do in congress. in both chambers show the process unfolding without analysis without interruption and no commentary you havelso agreed with the psident 18 year term limits for justices. forcible code of ethics more transparency and potential conflict of interest. adopt financial disclosure rule similar to members of congress executive branch more openness around public appearances, what do you mean? talk about those. >> on public appearances a lot of justices are appearing at events might find out about them three years later. in some of those events are partisan. just like when i work for politicians back in that i had set out a press release the night before saying commissioner x was appearing at a place why at times the. the supreme court should do that to not for every event but for some and i don't care what justice br

of supreme court appeals and by the judge in florida. >> comparing her to judge cannon is night and dayrits. remember judge cannon had the same motion that donald trump made about selective prosecution and vindictive prosecution but she did not rule on that. she didn't want to hand that defeat to donald trump. instead the first day of the republican convention issued this sort of equally crazy dismissal motion that is now on appeal. judge chutkan, as you said, is very fast and made it absolutely clear that donald trump's efforts to say that he has been singled out for political reasons is absolutely meritless and goes through all of the claims and says as you noted there is no evidence. she will have her hands full, even if kamala harris vans with this supreme court that is still doing the bidding of donald trump and its immunity decision and although it gave a partial victory for donald trump it still will remain for it to go back up to the supreme court. she has her hands full, but she is acting really quickly and we can be sure she will be fair to both sides. >> going forward, she ha

that argument will be rejected by the district court, but the supreme court said donald trump's still can appeal that meaning to the dc court of appeals and then potentially back to the supreme court before trial. so there's no way phil, that we get through that whole appeals process and still started trial between now and november 5. i mean, that's just not going to happen. all right. elie honig, stick with us. we got a lot more to get to on this we want to go back to cnn's kaitlan poll answers continued digging through this kaitlan. what are you seeing right now? what stood out to you as you've had some more time with it, will fell as elie is saying, one of the things here is that the prosecutors really are trying to refocus this around the private things that donald trump was doing, either as a candidate or working with people who were private citizens at the time of the election and after the election. and one of the things that this refocusing of the charges looks like is that it focuses on how donald trump was using people in battleground states arizona, michigan, georgia, et cetera. to try and change the electoral votes

is something that we have been hunting for during this crazy period of supreme court appeals and crazyings by the federal judge in florida. >> yeah, so comparing her to judge cannon, you know, it is night and day in terms of extremes, leaving aside the merits. remember, judge cannon had the same motion that donald trump made about selective prosecution and vindictive prosecution. but she did not rule on that. it is clearly, was a loser, but she didn't want to hand that defeat to donald trump. instead, she him on the first day of the republican convention issued this sort of equally crazy dismissal motion. the one that is now on appeal. judge chutkan, you said, is very fast and made it absolutely clear that double trumps efforts to say that he has been singled out for political reasons is absolutely meritless and goes through all of the claims and says, as you noted, there is no evidence. a she will have her hands full, though, even, frankly, if kamala harris wins, with this supreme court that is still doing the bidding of donald trump in its immunity decision. and although it gave a pa

of effort to interfere with the election. but they're also, as i noted, they are still appealing the question of how the supreme court's ruling granting former president trump some immunity in the january 6 case. how that could appeal to applying to his new york conviction. they have argued that certain pieces of evidence that were brought in at trial specifically conversations that hope hicks testified about and tweets that he sent out that under the supreme court's ruling, those should be tossed out now it's unclear if the case is going to be tossed out or what the judge will think. but right now, the judge said he will issue his opinion on that et on september 16, and then he's going to sentence trump on the 18th. his lawyers argue here that is just not enough time for them to exercise any appellate rights such is why they're asking for the sentencing to be pushed back. >> addressing carrie, how do you see the immunity ruling impacting this conviction of trump well, i think there is a real issue for the judge to consider here the fact of matter is that the supreme court's immunity ruling did find that there are some immuni

of murder always gets an appeal. the difference is that it didn't go through the intermediate court of appeals first and the state supremethe case. this case is going to be appealed based on evidentiary rulings that judge newman made based on the trial was in walterboro and they felt there should have been a change of venue. >> but most fortunetly as you said, that there was alleged juror interference, i represented six jurors who testified that not only did they not hear former clerk of court, becky hill say anything that was any more than just ministerial of like, what do you want for lunch? >> how do you want to get to and from the courthouse? but nothing that was said or done influenced their verdicts. the issue before the supreme court's going to be the former chief justice who denied the motion for a retrial, applied. >> the south carolina standard for juror interference the defense argued they should have applied the federal standard pronounced by the united states supreme court. >> the difference is the south carolina's standard says that you must show in addition to the inappropriate statements by becky hill tha

of the indictments, has the supreme court given donald trump's attorneys another path of delay? you talked about the fact that these decisions are likely going to be subject to another round of appealsast test, ultimately given trump's team another avenue to push this further and further by challenging whatever the decisions are provided they are not out right dismissals? >> it's very likely there would have been a second round of appeals following the judges decisions, even if the supreme court had set out a clear test. and that is the case because the supreme court says that trump should not have to go to trial over conduct that he is entitled to presidential immunity for. that means that the appellate courts will take a second cut at it after the courts originally found that the judge got it wrong the first time. it's a complicated process, and the court makes it much more difficult for the judge to get it right, by failing to set forward a streamlined test. that's one of the many flaws in the court's decision in the immunity case. >> i have about one more minute and i have to ask, what is the likelihood at all that this case, the election interference case sees the light of day

from there, donald trump will have the right to appeal to the court of appeals, the intermediate court of appeals, and then protest the supreme court. so 0.0% chance this thing gets tried before the 2024 election and john, just yesterday, jack smith filed an appeal to bring back the classified documents case. >> now he's filing the superseding indictment to save the election interference case do think he's sending a signal here that he's going to keep up the fight i think it's very clear he's going to keep up the fight the mar-a-lago documents case. >> he filed a very aggressive brief. he did not ask for the judge to be removed. all of this would if she is overturned, would be he's a third strike and i suspect it's a very strong brief showing that the judge judge cannon had very little basis for tossing the case and dismissing the special prosecutor. there's a long history in the department of justice, the attorney general's appointing special prosecutors. she wants to demolish that. indeed did she would have her ruling upheld. all assistant u.s. attorneys would be out of work. so it's a very striking situation down there. an

supreme court of the united states, a colorado native. justice gorsuch served as a judge on the us court of appeals for the 10th circuit before his appointment to the supreme court by president donald j. trump in 2017. he has also worked as a senior official at the justice department, where he helped oversee its civil litigating divisions. as a partner at a law firm, a law professor and as a law clerk for justices byron white and anthony kennedy. his new book, which you all have in your hands, is overruled. the human toll of too much law. it just hit stores this week and is sure to be his second bestseller. following his 29 book, 2019 book, a republic if you can keep it, we have additional copies of the book available for sale in the museum store following the program. justice gorsuch will be interviewed today by jim byron president and ceo of the richard nixon foundation. so with that, ladies and gentlemen, all rise, please, and welcome justice gorsuch for. your honor. welcome to the nixon library. it is a real honor to have any justice of the supreme court with us, but particularly you, sir. and i want to welcome you back. so thank you for

of it. i filed an election appeal, so the election chamber of the supreme court is looking into this attackn the election process, this is an attempted coup d'état using the election process. so the moral authority, the country's general prosecutor's office, addresses all registered presidential candidates, compares all the evidence, conducts a high-level technical analysis of the results of the july 28 election. venezuela remains increasingly isolated in the region, only countries those close to russia, china and iran immediately recognized maduro's election. venezuela was expelled. diplomats from seven countries that denounced the election as rigged, including argentina and peru. the streets of the country remain under increased surveillance by the police and the armed forces. jan boeschat from caracos venezuela, oos america. that's it, we'll say goodbye, see you tomorrow. education is the future. of every country, what is changing in ukrainian schools, what will the university of tomorrow look like, the country is plunging into the world of educational transformations, we ask experts, we

sueme court the biden administration lawyers had gone to e supreme court challenging a very sweeping order by the eighth circuit court of appealswhich is in the midwestern part of the country that had negated the effect of the biden plan universally throhout the cotry. and t administer, the supreme court said no but it did say that it expec the ruling and with some this dispatch and not a single publicly plea boris joan biskupic, thanyou so much for clarifying that for usthanks. brina, vice president kamala harris has st landed georgia so where she and her running te, governor tim walz are kicking off a bus tour in battleground, georgia one day before their first sit down interview since becoming the new democratic ticket. ts is you'll see right here tomorrow on cnn with our own dana bash. and i think we have some pictures actually of her plane arriving there in savannah that we'll be able to show you here in just a moment. actually, here's, here's the pool picture coming to us of the vice president biden's plan. so we'll be waiting for her to de-plane. they're in savannah, joining us now is leon panetta. he was defense secreta

whom were more district judges than court of appeals judges but they go on and have second careers in mediation or arbitration. i can think of judges i know from supreme court's in other countries with distinguished service on you end panels or bring their experience to bear. the kind of person who i think would be a judge for 18 years is already committed to public service. they are likely to say, i hope the department of x or y gives me a huge salary. if that's what they want to do they can leave over 2 -- after two years if they want to. they will still get it. i just don't think anything like that is likely to happen. and, one of the details about one of these 18 year plans is it is a term of years. if, for example, a justice tragically fell ill and died after three years of service you don't get any longer term. the president at that time can fill the remaining 15 years. the possibility of strategic retirement is far less under this program or idea then we have now. and there is another point i would make. that is that the current system rewards the appointment of the youngest possible person that might qualify for the supreme court, people in th

of that for years. ryan has been amazing on that. that is something i'm very excited we have live audio not just in the supreme court but every federal or of appealsn the shoulders of giants on that one. host: c-span has repeatedly asked the court to allow cameras into the courtroom to do what we do congress, show the process unfolding, uninterrupted and no commentary. 18 year term limit for justices, enforceable code of ethics, adopt financial disclosure rules , more openness around public appearances, what do you mean? guest: a lot of the justices are appearing and we only find out about them months or years later. just like when i worked for politicians, i would say governor asked -- x, the supreme court could do that too. justice breyer is an example. if you have justice sotomayor or justice thomas speaking at the federal society or one of these other groups, it is important for the public to know about it. i think the supreme court police could manage that. the justices meeting with people in their chambers. this is the historical society. if you remember 18 months ago, the historical society was being used to get to influence the justices. h

the ministry of culture together with the ministry of justice submitted a cassation appeal to the supreme economic court. still in 2021 in 2008, they tried to transfer the property of the museum in peregov to false persons. according to... representatives of the museum, the raiders forged all the documentation and are trying to illegally take possession of the land. as you and i understand, it is impossible to simply buy state property, especially the property of the reserve, which is protected by legislation, and cannot be privatized at all according to the law of ukraine on the protection of cultural heritage. the lands belonged to the museum from the very beginning of the foundation of the museum and the deed to this territory. the museum received this designation in 1976 a piece of land was never changed, this land was given for permanent use to the state museum of people's architecture and life of the ukrainian ssr, then according to this document. in odesa , law enforcement officers destroyed an international criminal organization that produced and sold up to 100 kg of heavy psychotropic drugs eve

i went to seattle that year between my court of appeals and supreme court clerkship. i was about ready to move there. part of that i was and am a huge nirvana fan and i came to the promised land. i was there recently for ninth circuit argument. i had to run for my hotel the federal court literally on fifth avenue in seattle there is a real problem the ninth circuit had decided the eighth amendment of all things obstacle cannot camp overnight in the middle of the city. were not going to allow that that is unlawful. the court took it up. the question presented this eighth amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment and the answer is of course not it's not even close i say this as somebody thanks the eight up amendment is important where it applies. it is a complete mismatch for the situation court states have and localities have to have the opportunity and the ability to respond to local conditions that are deteriorating and do something about it. megan is one of the cases if anything has a little surprise that the decision in a nutshell. hopefully in the long

>> she has not exhausted all appeals well, after the court of arbitration for sport, the only place left to appeal is the swiss federal supremert. as suisse tribunal they do hear cases from the court of arbitration for sport and the us olympic and paralympic committee and usa gymnastics say they will appeal on behalf of jordan chiles biles to that court. that court looks at technical issues, procedural issues, and oman, are there procedural problems here, including the fact that the americans were able to put a time stamp video is it's been reported, of course, over the last week, i time stamp video showing that they put the appeal at it 47 seconds, not a minute and four seconds. the whole thing is wrong. it's all based on mistakes, as well as the usopc and usa gymnastics not being alerted in time because the court of arbitration for sport was sending emails to the wrong email address. and that's what this swiss court will look at victor. and i think the u.s and jordan chiles have a pretty good case in that court. >> all right. christine brennan, always good to have you with us to sort it all out. thank you. >> coming up, we'

supreme court denied that request. and that means the injunction will stay in place while the court of appeals considers the ruling. this is the second student loan forgiveness plan to be challenged by multiple conservative, conservative leaning states led by missouri. a new development tonight in the israel-hamas war. israeli forces launched a large operation in the occupied west bank. the israeli military carried out airstrikes, raids and sealed off the city of jenin. israel says it's trying to eliminate and prevent future terrorism attacks. a palestinian emergency service says the attack left at least ten dead and injured 22 dozen. israel has been conducting raids in the west bank nearly every day since the hamas attack on october 7th, but this operation has seen as the largest in over 20 years. santa clara county is getting a big funding boost to help out its unhoused veterans and farm workers. congresswoman zoe lofgren was in san jose today announcing funding for two county projects. $1 million will be going toward transitional housing for the homeless veterans project. that money will fund improvements to a f

circuit court of appeals had survived attack by trump there. it was only the supreme court that the damage, if any, to the indictment but what we are hearing maybe there wasn't damage. one of the questions i've been asked from others is, why no new codefendant in this case? it's only case in indictment donald trump had where he was facing the charges by his lonesome. >> in fact, if there were to be a superseding indictment, would've thought that would be the reason to do it. we got those unindicted co- conspirators remaining in the indictment. one has been removed. speculation is that person who is now out of the case was jeffrey clark who was a justice department official who came close to being the acting attorney general. he is out because they conduct is official conduct. the others remain. speculation being rudy giuliani and john eastman and some of the others. those five unindicted co- conspirators are still there. i speculated that the reason they were not named as defendants and were referred to as unindicted co-conspirators was to streamline the case or perha

of j.d. vance running with president trump. we spent time with her on friday. we asked her about clerking for supreme court justices. and she did clerk for kavanaugh when he was with court of appealshe was a judge in d.c. and she clerked for him. before he became a supreme court justice. but she did clerk. and these clerkships are very hard to get for chief justice roberts. i believe when she was at yale. and she talked about watching kavanaugh after she had worked for him. knowing who he was when he went through all of that through the confirmation process. listen. >> ainsley: you clerked for justice kavanaugh. when you watched what happened to judge kavanaugh, or justice kavanaugh now, when you watched him go through all of that and just be bee rated and reputation from years and years and years before were brought out and brought to the forefront and people were saying different things. it how did you feel to that and can you relate to that now? >> everyone just loved him. he hired people from all over the political spectrum. real requirement for people who wanted to clerk for him is can you be a decent person? can you be the kind of person other person trust and respect? he re