or a deal carefully brokerage by the supreme government, alongside the european union, the united arab emirates, the united states, and others, secret officials check the goods we face really oversight. and monitor the passage from this coordination center to try and ensure they get to gauze safely. the 1st thing in where we focus currently is to have a successful fest the journey. and then of course, we already have stowed more quantities. so if you want to tie in a, in cyprus, we hope to establish the quoted or to really be in a position to deal with the dire situation on the ground. this is not a swift or simple root of fatalities involved is building a make shift. jackie to receive 8 and separately the us plants to build a bigger temporary peer the united nations. there's no warning. garza is on the brink of 5 minutes, some 400 kilometers from here in cyprus, and the road trip takes days. there is a quicker and easier way to get a in through road crossings. israel says 8, welcome to the see colored or on thought. it's committed to get some food to josten's. but it's also faced heav

government has a minimal stake. mr. president ordered that as a resolution of the supreme council meeting, all government agencies are obliged to use the management capacity of the non-governmental sector in companies in which the government has a minimum share from the beginning of 1403 . until now, we still haven't received a share of justice , i didn't know how to name an adjective, what to do , sam doesn't have justice, i don't have a share of justice, now we ourselves don't have a share of justice, it was 141 in order to answer the demand of the rest of the equity shares , the law on the allocation of equity shares in the budget was passed to approve the transfer of part of the government's shares to individuals. it was decided that the equity shares will be allocated only to a group of survivors under the cover of support institutions and the like, 4 million 700 thousand people are in the priority of this work. this identification was approved in 1401 despite the approval of the council to allocate equity shares to the survivors. excellent political. the main hundreds of 44, the lack of valuable stocks postponed the im

those in which the government has a minimal stake, the capacity of the non-governmental sector will be used. mr. president ordered that as a resolution of the supremencil meeting, all government agencies are obliged to use the management capacity of the non-state sector from the beginning of 1403. in companies in which the government's shares are minimal use in the meeting of the supreme council for the implementation of the general policies of article 44 of the constitution, the general framework for the allocation of equity shares to the beneficiaries was approved. this framework becomes the basis of action after determining the task of the relevant stock portfolio in the board of ministers. we have so far equity. we didn't get it yet, i didn't know how to name the adjective, what to do, it doesn't have equity shares, i don't have equity shares, we ourselves don't have equity shares, it was in 1401 that to answer the demand of the remaining equity shares, the law on the allocation of equity shares in the budget was approved, approving the transfer of part of the government's shares to people without equity shares the basis of this resolution. des

government. rachel: the supreme court appearing skeptical of limiting government interaction with social media platformssuit accusing the biden administration of colluding with big tech when he was still missouri attorney general. he joins us now senator schmitt. >> great to e sou -- see you. >> you said earlier you felt like arguments went well in the supreme court. but it also sounds like the justices were somewhat skeptical of the case. where do you think it stands right now? >> well i think a case of this gravity which is the most important free speech certainly case in our lifetime perhaps and u.s. history you should expect some tough questions. but i think it is tricky to read too much into oral arguments, i mean, truth of the matter is a lot of cases that you'll hear where you think questioning goes one particular way from one particular justice that ultimate decision goes another way. seen that happen both ways ultimately these cases are decided on the briefs that are submitted in the record and the good news here, when i was a.g. before we got the political their injunction hearing because we w

we have heard a number of complaints from the government in beijing this week about the american debate on tiktok. i find a super many ironic -- supremely ironic. government officials are using the x platform to criticize the u.s. they don't give their assistance director use x, instagram, facebook, or have access to google. it is ironic that the government is complaining about a process when they shut down access to all these platforms. caroline: we have to get up to speed with what is happening in the u.s. weekly question now is actually key question now -- the key question now is does starting numbers in the house carry over to what we might see in be senate -- see in the senate? ed: that is the question -- daniel: that is the question. you have a variety of opinions, their hundreds of senators and each will have their opinion. mike gallagher said yesterday -- as mike gallagher said yesterday. there are a couple of paths, one that could go quickly and others that could take longer. it is looking they will take the longer deliberative path. it is the question of do the interests stay there, where are we two or three weeks from now? is

government health insurance programs. host: a couple minute before the supreme court begins their arguments in murthy v. officials communicating with social media companies on content moderation. what have we not gotten into in health care and campaign 20 for that you want to talk about? guest: one more next tuesday tt reproductive rights. we will start hearing issue thee authority but when a woman during her pregnancy would be allowed to take this medication for which she would need to see another reproductive health and abortion related issues. >> bipartisan policy center and the hotbed issue with that -- >> that is a tough one. there are a couple of issues -- our role is to get partisan democrats and republicans together and take the best ideas. get involved in cases up to the supreme court. but those types of issues are difficult. not to sayhe helping the disabl. but we look for opportunities [indiscernible] certain issues -- what is the health care issue you have had more -- the most success doing that? >> it■ would say health care affordability when it comes to social needs and medicare, medical■/

. >> we have heard a number of complaints from the government in beijing this week about the american debate on tiktok. i find it supremely ironic. government officials here are using the x platform to criticize the united states. they do not give their own citizens the right to use x, instagram, facebook, google. it is ironic indeed the government is complaining about a process where they shut down access for 1.4 billion chinese to all of these platforms. every country has a duty and responsibility to protect its national security. what the president has done over the last year and a half is to make it impossible for sensitive american technology, advanced semiconductors for ai purposes, to be sold to china. we know what will happen. the people's liberation army will take advantage of that technology to strengthen itself at the expense of the american military. we are not going to do that. we are not going to compromise national security and we are not going to negotiate. you can bet the government in beijing is taking similar measures. they have not allowed for most of the last 20 years the export of course sensitive na

after the supreme court defeat, the government - country. the government went - country. after the supreme court. defeat, the government went back country. after the supreme court - defeat, the government went back to the drawing board in a way and said that it had ironed out some of those concerns. is it likely that this bill will be overall passed by the lords even though that's one amendment hasn't gone through? i think what we're expecting is the government to suffer a series of defeats over amendments that will be tabled, and what will happen then is that the house of lords will send its back to the house of commons and mps will another chance to debate it. they are likely because the government has a majority in the house of commons whereas it doesn't and the house of lords, the mps are likely to overturn all the changes that the lords have me before it goes back to the house of lords. the house of lords won't, in the end, blocked the bill entirely, but they may delay it long enough for the scheme not to come into force before an electi

government. in them , there are minimal shares, the capacity of the non-governmental sector will be used. mr. president ordered that as a resolution of the supreme council meeting, all government agencies are obliged. from the beginning of 1403 to using the management capacity of the non-governmental sector in companies where the government has minimal shares . the vote of the representatives to amend the country's trade union law in the last session of the 11th parliament in 1402 , the representatives in the reform of the country's trade union law determined the mechanism of holding trade union elections and caused the members to be members of the representatives for more than two consecutive terms, also in order to satisfy the opinion of the council. the guardians of the financing plan for production and infrastructure have been amended. the revision of the trade union law of the islamic council of iran continued for the second week in a row today. he said that in article 4, there is a proposal for a plan whose purpose is to clarify the union's income, especially their tax income. in the review of this plan , new mechanisms for unification of

meliyeh, well, we hope that the government will support us. anyway, the supremeder of the revolution emphasized that you should take care of the private sector. you have to bring people into the work flow, to continue the work, to be in the work process , to be in the policy making, to be in the planning . what does not come and enter is actually that capital production. if it does not come and enter that field, the most important so-called challenge, the most important problem that producers and all economic enterprises have is the ambiguous space that is placed in front of them , which means that they do not know exactly what is going to happen to their production or support. can he? is the real capital that should be injected into the discussion, i.e. in support discussions, done? can they sell their products at the same price that happened to them? on the one hand, production is a risk, on the other hand, it means a risk tolerance, it should be the one who has the same amount, that is, exactly every producer and everyone who does economic work puts an amount

delicate, here it was necessary to establish a very strict balance so that the supreme national assembly did not replace other governments about who would be the delegates of the supreme national assembly, we argued for a long time about the number of people, we wanted it to be body, truly an all-belarusian people's assembly, a people's body that reflected the interests and requests of all residents of our country, we have limited the terms of the president's stay in power, two terms, according to constitution now, and we understand, after some time... to declare at the constitutional level, but time dictates such amendments: we have ruled out military aggression against other states, thus protecting ourselves from rash actions. the same applies to the use of the atom, in our country it is only peaceful, while we do not exclude the right to defend one’s state, so as not to go astray , the preservation of historical memory and traditional family values, as well as the concept of marriage as a union of a man and a woman, are enshrined in the constitution, and not from... it is clearly stated that citizens of the republic

of companies in which the government has a minimum share of the capacity of the non-governmental sector. will be used. mr. president ordered that as a resolution of the supreme meeting, all government agencies are obliged. since the beginning of 1403 , in order to use the management capacity of the non-governmental sector in companies in which the government shares are minimal . the problems of the cultural and sports companies of esteghlal and persepolis were investigated in the presence of the managers of the stock exchange organization, a group of representatives of these two companies and the ministry of sports at the meeting of the industry desk of the stock exchange organization. in this meeting, the problems of esteghlal and press police companies regarding the determination of the share ownership of the two clubs , the demands of the debts of the past years of the club and getting and the identification of the club's income was investigated. the investigation of the legal structure governing the two companies, the modification of the trends , the income streams of the contracts and the identification of the identity of the two companies were among th

would so chaos. >> we can't have each state negotiating with texas, it has to be the national government, the supreme court has said that over and over. >> reporter: immigration is a top issue, the bipartisan border bill, is stalled as voters across the country press for solutions.>> as advocates raise concerns it could raise to racial profiling, on immigration, seeking a tougher stance in response to voters increasing concerns about border security, without going too far and alienating progressives on the issue. nbc news. >>> thank you alles, still ahead, restoring historic signs in san jose, why people say it's more than just a vanity project. >>> a bay area county is taking a proactive approach to deal with rising sea levels, the amount of money it's allocating in the plan it is implementing.>>> i am your chief meteorologist, we enjoyed the blue sky and sunshine and warmer temperatures but it's about the change, we will go to 65 as we had in the friday, 56 on saturday, along with the cooling temperatures we are also looking at the potential of simmering all coming back. updated timing totals >>> i

pandemic people searching for information prevented by our government that is a massive threat to liberty moving forward i really hope the supremeustices, get their heads straight make the right decision here. maria: really mike, quick your reaction. mike: kaylee is right purpose of first amendment to tell government what it can't do in fact if you look at bill of rights all 10 restricted government in the low the people, founders were worried government would get too big intrusive that is exactly what they've become i am not a supreme court justice or lawyer i don't play one on tv i can read the searcher text of the first amendment realize it says the government shall make no law then restricts what government can do, this is the same supreme court justice, couldn't tell us what a woman was, so maybe she is just confused about more things than we even realize. >> i don't know we're watching this play out we don't have a ruling but listening to her comments, about that has raised some eyebrows i think because, we just want the supreme court justices to make sure the constitutional is being followed, i mean talking about, did gov

on the other hand, just as the supreme leader said. the governmentody and the servants of the people, dear young people, should enter with that new enthusiasm and ability . and raising the retirement age is not in the interest of the people. representatives of the people are representatives of the people, yes, not representatives insurance or social security companies, do you agree or disagree with this situation by removing subsidies for rich and high-income people? we believe that subsidies should be given to all people as a human right, but it should be targeted. if the subsidies are through intermediaries, they will not reach the people, those middlemen are working, and later, many subsidies will not reach all the people. let us consider the gasoline subsidies , they will only reach a certain number of people, some of you. villages or nomads who don't have cars at all and don't use gasoline will definitely not get their due in this matter and you do you believe that the salaries of government workers and employees should be increased according to

government to respond to complex problems and novel crises. one is the what's called the brand new major questions doctrine which the current supreme court has invokedto strike down government initiatives on. issues ranging from covid to climate change and another is an interest on the part of many of the current justices in reviving an aggressive non delegation doctrine that would have limits on the power that congress can delegate the executive branch. and that was a kind of hallmark of the pre 1937 court. so the short answer your question, bill, terms of the legacy in the law is that many these decisions in world war two were very fundamental cases for many decades and to some extent they're very under fire right now. do we have any questions from the audience? yes, i see. oh, please come to the microphone if you do. and we may have some from our virtual audience. well, we do. let's see what we have. this is from mary on youtube a watching on youtube. did fdr his personal relationship with justices break tradition is another president previously who did the same. who i can think of a couple of personal relationships maybe in the johnson era but m

, and in this context , they finally said that even the annual budget of the government should come to the supremencil and the supreme council in this case. he should announce his point of view and the opinion of mr. dr. bihari of new policies in the new management period of the council. that we are in the new management period, what changes have you made and what are your plans for the future? especially the part that your excellency mentioned that you and your colleagues feel the problems that exist in cities and villages and then you think about them. whichever year it happens. what will be the approach now? we are now continuing a two-year plan for the supreme council to know where we want to reach in the end, and based on this plan, we are now getting help from the majlis research center, and based on this plan, we will move forward, for example, one of the programs that are going to be presented today are the plans presented by the tehran municipality, in fact, the management of a single fabric of firefighting and safety. it is the country. well, now you know that finally, different parts of

mucinex nightshift, it's comeback season. >> laura: supreme court heard arguments today challenging the government'sth social media companies to prevent so-called disinformation during the covid pandemic. plaintiffs from missouri and louisiana allege that dozens of federal agencies coerced social media platforms to censor post on covid restrictions. the government argued that this wasn't coercion. these were necessary public health directives. >> in the context of an effort to get americans vaccinated during a once in a lifetime pandemic. i really think that piece of conduct doesn't change the first amendment principles but relevant to how they apply here. i think it's important to understand that at this time this was a time when thousands of americans will still dying every week and there was a hope that getting everyone vaccinated could stop the pandemic and there was s a concern that americans were getting their news about the vaccine from these platforms and the platforms were promoting not just bad information. >> laura: justices alito and thomas didn't seem to buy the government's reasoning b

supreme administrative council. no, i disagree with your statement. is your government's bill enough, or you as a member of the parliament, as a member of the parliament, the government has come here and said, "sir, i want to sell oil so much, other than that , i want to collect this much from taxes, this much will be collected from customs and other revenues." for example, 240 thousand billion tomans, you know that the sale of oil did not materialize to such an extent that the pensioners' salary should not be taken from the employee's salary. in the field of oil sales, it has not been realized yet. you say that mr. mede, you say that the government's revenues have not been realized. i say that if we want to go back to our words , see if the government 's revenues are not realized. mr. engineer, you and i should not let the government's income go. it is not possible. he came this year and told you that i do n't want to sell it. in current costs if we come and see what we have in a couple of cities, tell us to set up a hospital in the city, which is not the specialty of th

just as the supreme leader said , the government body and the people's servants should come from aziz with that new enthusiasm and ability, and increasing the retirement age is not in the people's interest . social security , do you agree or disagree with this situation by removing subsidies for rich and high-income people? we believe that subsidies are a human right that should be given to all people , but it should be targeted. pity and desire are at work, and later too subsidies don't reach all people . let's consider gasoline subsidies. they only reach a certain number of people. some people in villages or nomads who don't have cars and don't use gasoline will definitely not get their rights in this case. do you believe that the salaries of workers and government employees should be increased according to the rate of inflation or a proportion of the salaries of employees and workers. the price is not in a good situation now. if it should have increased in the previous years, it would have increased according to the inflation rate . it has not increased, and now that proportion is

based on the government transformation document and the emphasis of the supreme leader of the revolution in farvardin 1402, that universities should be the answer to the needs of the society, in this regard , the actions that took place remove some blurs it was that maybe the applicant did not have how many and that we were removed for what was removed. please note that with the follow-ups we have done , in the 7th development plan, a decree has been issued regarding making education skill-oriented, and a decree has been issued regarding the purpose of higher education to be planned in such a way that the subjects taught in the university are discussed. it should be related to the needs of the society because the third principle of the constitution says that higher education is free up to the limit of self-sufficiency, which means that where we spend money from the public budget of the government should be based on the needs of the society, so we checked that we did. some fields are voluntary. for example , we wanted 10 senior students for that field code, one student would come or two w

raisi emphasized that the government will use all its power to fulfill his wishes, especially in the field of fulfilling the slogan of the year. the supreme leader of the islamic revolution also prayed for the success of the president and the government in this conversation. the president also had separate conversations with ayat, makarem shirazi, nouri hamdani shabiri zanjani, javadi ameli sobhani, while congratulating the beginning of the month of ramadan and the beginning of the new year, he called for the continuation of spiritual attention and prayers for the government's success in solving the country's problems. the authority to send taqlid also said this. guha appreciated the services and efforts of the 13th government in 1402 and wished success to the government in serving the people and solving the country's problems . expulsion of arab knesset representative due to anti-zionist statements of knesset representative of arab origin. israel was expelled from the knesset for accusing the israeli army of genocide and killing palestinian babies with hunger weapons in gaza. number of infants in infants exposed to death from the palesti

. >> we have heard a number of complaints from the government here in beijing about the american debate on tiktok. i find it supremelyronic. because government officials here are using the x platform to criticize the u.s. they don't give their own citizens the right to use x, instagram, facebook, to have access of google. and so it is ironic indeed that the government here is complaining about a process when they shut down access for 1.4 billion chinese to all these platforms. every country has a duty and responsibility to protect its national security. and what the president has done over the last 1.5 years is to make it impossible for sensitive ai technology to be sold to china because we know what will happen. we know that with the people's liberation army, they will take advantage of the technology to strengthen itself at the expense of the american military. we are not going to do that. we are not going to compromise our national security. and we are not going to negotiate. can you can bet that the government here in beijing is taking similar measures. they have not allowed for their about -- for the last 20 yea

. >> we have heard a number of complaints from the government in beijing this week about the american debate on tiktok. i find it supremely ironic because government officials here are using the x platform to criticize the u.s. they don't give their own citizens the right to use x, to use instagram, facebook, to have access to google, so it is ironic indeed that the government here is complaining about a process where they shut down access for 1.4 billion chinese to all deplatforms. every country has a duty and responsibility to protect its national security, and what the president has done is to make it impossible for sensitive american technology, advanced semiconductors for ai services, to be sold to china because we know it will happen. the people's liberation army will take advantage of the technology to strengthen itself at the expense of the american military. we are not going to do that or compromise our national security , and we will not negotiate. you can bet that the government here in regime is taking similar measures. we have not allowed most of the last 20 years the export of poor, sensitive national securi

government in subsidy. if they study the torah full time and religious institutions, israel supreme court has ordered the government to stop payments for those who defy the draft. comes from a growing resentment among those called to him list. i don't know what we won't be ultra orthodox in the army now, no delays, no politics, and no tricks. the issue is a challenge for benjamin that's a yahoo! the could wreck his coalition and he built in alliance with right when groups to secure his term as prime minister and overseeing an end to the military exemption could be seen as political betrayal. anybody talks anytime, as it goes there? i'm sure we can get disagreements with the majority in the canals. that would also, one thing is clear to me. it's impossible to obtain a total consensus or it's been a controversial issue for years, but the war and garza has turned it into an urgent one. military leaders say they need more people to lose it, more people on the ground in gaza. so ministers say they're ready to resign. if the exemption continues a little, what actually mean this nation cannot accept it and it should not b

we have the right to protect us from government overreach. >> historically never even expected the most liberal supreme court justice or anybody in the public sphere to believe there was a priority of the government's ability to capture this information, that was superior to the protection of the first amendment and starting to see supreme court justice or other people who were supposed to be our elected leaders honoring the constitution to cast that aside and put of the government's concerns at of that is very troubling. >> trace: it has a lot of people very troubled. great to have you on the show as always, thank you. >>> former president don from got a femur -- major break from the people's court and his flawed judgement, his bond was adduced from $454 million to know $175 million. he has ten days deposed. we have the breaking information onto the story life for us in new york, evening. >> reporter: hello trays, former president donald trump won a legal victory as you said, an appeals court is now giving donald trump ten days to post a bond for 175 million to secure the civil fraud judgement against

for free speech. >> reporter: groups who say their voices have been silenced by the government rallied outside the supreme court monday as the justices heard arguments about whether the biden administration went too far combating controversial posts on social media. >> the 1st amendment had it been heeded during the pandemic helped save lives and i hope the court does the right thing by restoring the 1st amendment. >> reporter: the case, murphy versus missouri, rose out of efforts during the early months of the biden administration to push social media platforms to take down posts officials said express falsehoods about the pandemic and the 2020 election with federal courts ruling federal employees could not coerce or significantly encourage a platform's content moderation decisions. >> government can't just run rampant pressuring platforms to censure private speech. >> reporter: some appeared skeptical to the biden administration's actions. >> what do you do with the fact the platforms say no all the time to the government? >> your honor, it doesn't matter. >> reporter: attorneys for the biden administra

the supreme court meanwhile voicing skepticism over social media censorship, claims that the government did censor during yesterday's supreme court hearing. we've all been following this supreme court hearing, want to know what the supreme court says about censorship during covid. we all lived it. the republican attorneys generals accused censor ing posts. >> your view has the first amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods. the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens o of this country. maria: it doesn't sound like me thinks the government did anything wrong although we're not going to get the ruling for a couple months here but your thoughts? >> that was one of the most terrifying exchanges i've ever heard from a supreme court judge in the history of the union. there is no exception in the first amendment for times of emergency. it is -- if your right to speak, if your right to y assemble is infringed on by the federal government, what do we have left as a free and open society? there are speech crimes all

question work that the government crossed the line to where it does have jurisdiction into a whole area where it does. >> that's exactly the issue for determination of the suprement to have a situation in which the government, the fbi, other agencies are trying to constantly walk a line. how far can they go to keep perfectly legal protected speech off of public platforms? i don't think that the government ever has a valid interest in doing that. it can talk and come out publicly and say we don't agree that there could have been a lab leak. we think that is a ridiculous theory but to go to social media companies and say no one should be allowed to say that, we see from what has happened afterward that it's a bad idea to allow that to occur because they were wrong. >> john: congressman jordan, the process of influencing social media companies as you have called job boning, plaintiffs likened it to arm-twisting saying that officials at the white house berated media companies and threatened legal action if they didn't comply but to hear jen psaki say it and all play a clip from may 5th 2021, the white house was just making suggestions and they are nothing if not pe

government. according to it, at the time it was approved by the expert commission of the insurance council , it was also submitted to the supreme insurance council, but the basis of the law is the government's problem , it is actually the reason to be notified. it will be insurance. in addition, we have designed a supplemental coverage that some insurance companies offer, that is , before that price drop is actually available. insurance companies can come in the form of an additional coverage during the sale, in fact, during the sale of the insurance policy and offer this supplemental cover to the noble people of iran . this law you mentioned will change if the personal insurance is changed. no , it will be in the commitment of the insurance companies. the price will drop and in fact the rate will not change. i have a request, i want to use this. noble people of iran actually. well, the financial obligations of insurance companies increase from 30 million tomans to 40 million tomans during nowruzist travel, and therefore, in fact, noble people of iran can voluntarily refer to insurance companies or through the portals of insura

. >> reporter: groups who say their voices have been silenced by the government rallied outside the supreme court monday as the justices heard arguments about whether the biden administration went too far combatting controversial posts on social media. >> the first amendment, had it been heeded would have saved lives, and i hope the court does the right thing by restoring the first amendment in this case. >> reporter: the case, murthy versus missouri, pushed social media platforms to take down posts that spread falsehoods about the pandemic and the 2020 election and that they could not coerce or significantly encourage a platform's moderation decisions. >> reporter: some justices appeared skeptical to the biden administration's actions. >> what do you do with the fact that the platforms say no all the time to the government? >> your honor, it doesn't matter. >> reporter: attorneys for the biden administration argue that the federal officials' actions amounted to persuasion, not coercion. >> government speech crosses the line into coercion only if viewed objectively it can face a threat of a

s technology is based on the government transformation document and the emphasis that the supreme leader of the revolution had in farvardin 142 universities should be responsive to the needs of the society . in this regard, the actions that happened were the removal of some of the places that may not have had applicants , and how many of them were removed , and what a shame the place was revised and added to the previous ones. which did not exist, yes, please take care that with the follow-ups we did, in the 7th development plan , there was a decree regarding making education skill-oriented, and there was also a decree regarding education and higher education, which should be planned in such a way that the fields that discussion is taught in universities. it should be related to the needs of the society the third principle of the constitution says that higher education is free up to the limit of self-sufficiency, which means that where we spend money from the public budget of the government , it should be based on the needs of society . we wanted that course code, one student would come

effectively, we determined a successful, i think, balance of powers of the supreme national assembly , the president, the parliament, the governmentthorities will work towards a common goal, i would like to emphasize, i think that , of course, we will return to the vns. that it is precisely the responsibility of the na delegates that increases obviously, and this is where responsibility was spoken about, not only the right to join the supreme national assembly, but these people will also bear responsibility, including the authority of the party, in this case they will be subjected to certain criticism of how the party works, representatives of the party in the supreme national assembly, how representatives of civil society work , that is, in general, everything will be in front of people, this is one of the most important conclusions that we can draw, strengthening democracy is a clear and precisely strengthening of transparency and openness of activity bodies of state power, many issues that could be resolved in terms of powers... let's say, by the president alone, he considered it necessary to bring it to this, this large meetin

established precedent including supreme court precedent on similar cases stating that the enforcement of federal immigration laws is the sole purview of the federal governmenthe supreme court tends to be biased in favor of preserving the status quo. that indicates it's fairly likely the court will continue blocking this case. however, observers also point to the fact that the current conservative supermajority of the court has upended legal precedent in other cases. this is an extremely high-stakes and charged political issue. >> we'll be watching closely for any ruling from the supreme court, any decision on whether this law remains blocked and the supreme court moves forward with looking more deeply at this. thank you very much, david noriega. >>> overseas the russian election cementing putin's power and his reign as the longest-serving russian leader since stalin. >>> plus, what we just learned about president biden and israel's benjamin netanyahu. we're live from israel next on "ana cabrera reports." from isrn "ana cabrera reports." i'm not good being retired. i'm a pain in the neck. i like to be able to have a purpose. about three or four years ago, i

with the states they found the federal government appears to have violated first amendment protection this is the biden administration appeal even asking the supremeexpect the lawyer argue for government communication with social media companies not coercion just persuasion as you noted argument started in a few minutes we will keep on top of it. stuart: just persuasion i got it. thank you very much. we are at 954 and the markets open for 24 minutes, look at this we have the nasdaq up 226 points, can we share let's check google and apple they're getting together to supply a.i. stuff for the apple iphone the market loves it, alphabet up nine bucks, up 6% apple is breaking out 2.5% at 177. still ahead trump says biden dumped benjamin netanyahu and urged an end to the war in gaza. kevin o'leary says this is interesting don't merge your accounts with your significant other. is he talking about married couples we will have a discussion on that. a new report plastic governments covid response and warns of repeating the same mistakes. doc siegel response, the 10:00 o'clock hour is next. ♪ fresh, warm hot dogs! when i'm not selling hot dogs, i invest in a

on the other hand, as the supreme leader said, the body of government and service should be people's , dear young people should come in with that new enthusiasm and ability, and increase the retirement age . yes, it is not in the interest of the people. the people's representatives represent the people . or the opposite , we believe that subsidies are a human right and should be given to all my people, but it should be targeted. those middlemen are at work, and later many subsidies will not reach all people. let us consider gasoline subsidies only for one there are certain people who arrive in rural areas who do not have cars at all and do not use gasoline. they will definitely not get their rights in this case and you believe that the rights. workers and government employees should be increased according to the rate of inflation, or the salary of the employees and workers is not in a suitable situation now. if it was supposed to be increased according to the rate of inflation in previous years , it has not been increased. now, that proportion is not really established . be removed p

but late last year, the government, the supreme court ruled that the scheme was unlawful and the particulart the government is trying to do in this bill is to declare that rwanda is safe and it's signed a treaty with rwanda to put in place various measures to make that so. but a very strong opposition from the house of lords so far this evening, i'm just going to read you one quote from a conservative minister, someone that used to be on the government's' side on the house of commons, he is now in the house of lords. he said all my years in them parliament i've never told a lie, i'm asked to tell a lie. for goodness' sake, let's tell the truth. very strong words. the government is trying to arbitrarily say, no, it is safe. harry, thank you very much for that. let's cross live now and speak with john vian, who is the former uk independent chief inspector of borders and in... i want to get from you a feeling of what you actually make of the rwanda policy itself and how it should, according to government plans, and up working. good evening. i think it's anybody�*s guess as to whether it will w

government. i mean, the supreme court, you know, issued a ruling yesterday just a few hours later in the appeals court said no, we're not going to be doing that at least not for now. i mean, what you read on there, but what it tells you is that you know, the law on immigration is immensely complicated. who has what competencies, what authorities is constantly debated and the ports are a big factor in this. and so every time the by the administration thinks about what they're going to do, they have to think about the legal implications that about defending it in court. same thing if the administration texas wants to do something and it creates dissipates, an opening for smugglers, frankly as well, because they see the constant changing last the border, the constantly changing prophecies of the border because over to intervene in and they still live at to, to migrants telling them that it's a good time to go, or this is the moment because there is a lot of chaos in the policy. in mexico has now said that it will not accept deportations from tex and officials that are carried out based on this cont