the leader of a political force can visit. there, let's say the same mike johnson, can't, and this is definitely not the issue that is within the competence of the chairman of the supreme the council of ukraine or its deputy, especially when they represent another political force, is a shame for democracy, it must be clearly said that a country that allows itself to behave like this during a war is risking its reputation, why should we risk our reputation, and again- still, i think that this year we were shown an example of a civilized one. policy after the hamas attack on israel. ugh. what did prime minister benjamin netanyahu do? he immediately offered the leaders of the opposition forces to enter the military cabinet. although these not only did people not perceive him there, as , say, many representatives of the patriotic national-democratic forces did not perceive the populist forces that came to power as a result of the events of 2019 in ukraine. they fought for his resignation, took people out to demonstrations, came to his... his house, said not very nice things about his wife, remember, this is definitely something that president volodymyr zelenskyi did not experience, because the d

the actions of his employees, and demands an explanation. meanwhile, the assembly of judges of the dnipro district court appealed to the supreme council of justice, the council of judges of ukraine the prosecutor general with a statement about interference in the administration of justice. we emphasize that such illegal actions violate the basic principles of the legal system, the principles of criminal law. proceedings undermine confidence in legal institutions and have a potentially harmful effect on the work of the judicial branch of government. the meeting of judges of the obolon district court also stood up for colleagues. in a corresponding statement to the supreme council of justice, they called on the supreme judicial council and the council of judges, in case of confirmation of violations by the sbi, to take measures to bring to justice those who violated the guarantees of independence of judges. the authorities should not let this happen. if grp. ugh, that there really are signs of a crime here, they turn to of the prosecutor general, and prosecutor general andriy kostin, must immediately enter the data into the edpr and bring all of them to criminal proceedings, as an

of security. the judge requests this notice of intervention. actions regarding the administration of justice, i ask to be considered at a meeting of the supreme council of justice of the council of judges of ukraineed session, taking into account the circumstances i have outlined regarding the threat to the safety of my family members, in particular minor children. decision about the closed review was supported by 13 members of the vrp. according to his results, the supreme council of justice decided to contact the office of the prosecutor general and the director of the state criminal investigation department to verify the circumstances of the search in the dnipro district court. kyiv two weeks ago. members of the vrp draw the attention of the state bureau of investigation to the need to observe guarantees of independence of judges and maintain the authority of justice during investigative actions. the council of justice will also contact the judicial security service to ensure the personal safety of judge yulia ivanina and her family members. we will remind, on january 11, the meeting of judges of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv was informed about the conduct of a search in the co

and when i asked this question to the head of the supreme council of ukraine , leonid makarovych kravchukcame from moscow, met with him and told him, you you know, but they are all sure that the referendum may fail, leonid makarovych, and people are talking about it. and the administration of the president of the soviet union and the administration of the president of russia are oriented towards this, and alarin makarovych told me: it seems to me that they underestimate the ukrainian people and underestimate the ukrainian apparatus. well, that's a completely logical phrase for leonid makarovich, i think, i always believed that leonid makarovich was a wiser person than me and believed that everything worked out for him, it will work out and everything worked out for her, but the question is that leonid kravchuk... let's say, was guided by a completely different paradigm when he thought about the referendum than the representatives of the ukrainian national democrats and than the representatives of the russian and soviet political leadership. he understood that ukrainians would vote for eco

evidence that ruslan stefanchuk , he is, you know, the supreme chairman of the supreme council of the ukrainian soviet socialist republic, not the ukrain of independent ukraine. well , that's valentina shevchenko, i understood. thank you, mr. oleksii, for the conversation, it was oleksii honcharenko, people's deputy of ukraine from strasbourg. friends, we work live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are currently watching us on these platforms, please like this video to help it trend on youtube and facebook. well, take part in our survey. we are asking you today whether you support multiple citizenship in ukraine. so. no, if you are on youtube everything is quite simple, either yes or no, or write your comment under this video that you think about this, if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote, if you support multiple citizenship of ukraine 0.800 211 381, no 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free, call, at the end of the program we will we have the results of this vote, then we will be in touch with maksym. deputy commander of the third separa

yulia, obviously the legitimacy of both the president and... the supreme council will last until the next president of ukraineand until the next verkhovna rada is elected , well, at least in in 2005, kuchma was the president of ukraine until 2005, although his term of office, if i am not mistaken, ended at the end of october 2004, but since there was a third round of presidential elections, in november, in november, in november, in november. but, but, he remained in office until the arrival of the next president of ukraine, and the verkhovna rada also remains legitimate until the successors come and take over these powers, but here we are not even talking about the legitimacy of the verkhovna rada council and the president, and we are talking about its changeability and about democracy in ukraine, or whether it is even necessary to talk about the fact that people... should exercise their right to choose during the war, and again, if this war will continue one year and not two and not three , but more, in your opinion , is zelensky ready to share power with the opposition, because in principle, both the monopo

to protect journalists, do your best , show that ukraine is a democratic state, do everything so that journalists have access to... the supreme council of deputies, to decisions, then we will say that we really have wonderful deputies and we can speak well of them. nikita poturaev, yaroslav zheleznyak, victoria syumar were guests of our program today. ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in the program. during our program, we conducted a survey, we asked you about the following: do you trust the diligent? 94% yes, 6%? no , it's on the air on youtube, 96% don't trust even four, that's the ratio of numbers, i put a full stop on it, this is the verdict program of serhii ordenko, i'll say goodbye to you until tomorrow at 20:00, goodbye.

course there are a lot of dangers, which i spoke about earlier, are there any dangers left in the bill on mobilization, which has already been submitted to the supreme council of ukraineeviewed in the near future, it has only been submitted, i have not studied this project to the end, obviously i believe that the very method of preparing this project is illegal. because the president is responsible for mobilization, and it was necessary to immediately develop an effective project under the leadership of the president and immediately adopt it, because people in the army are definitely needed, at the same time, this draft law should promote mobilization and encourage people to go to defend the homeland, and not scare them and introduce regulations that will force them to flee the country altogether or never come here return. this is a very tricky balance, but definitely this balance must be maintained, there must be effective recruiting. human rights should not be limited, at the same time there should be electronic accounting, which we have now, well , supposedly introduced by voting for the law on electronic and electronic registers, although we had another law on reg

do with belgorod, let's continue conversation, kostenko, people's deputy of ukraine, secretary committee of the supreme councilnational security, defense and intelligence , a colonel of the security service of ukraine is already on our air. mr. roman, we congratulate you. good morning. mr. roman, i'm just curious, when such complex, large-scale attacks are being prepared, they are adjacent to a military attack, a terrorist attack, plus it is intensified by attacks on the front line, do we have the ability with our counterintelligence and other means? of the special services to find out in advance about the preparation of such massive strikes or not yet, you know, we can openly say here you can't talk about it, we definitely have different opportunities in our special services in different ways, including bura, including in its security service of ukraine, which is also actively working on that side, so we see that the main thing what we see is when... the planes take off or they stop for refueling, let's say , when they are loaded with ammunition, we see that directly related to the preparation of such large a

commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, and everyone who owns and has permissions to discuss issues of this level, and after discussion at the national security council, the president of ukraine, the supremender-in-chief, has to submit such a draft law to the verkhovna rada for adoption, this is how it should be from the point of view of legality, logic and responsibility. mr. olezh, look, i would still like your assessment of the application. minister of foreign affairs dmytro kuleba, who gave an interview to cnn and said that ukraine has a plan a, which it believes in, and accordingly, there is no alternative to plan b, because in the event of the cessation of western weapons, they do not plan such a thing at all, that western weapons will not be supplied to us, but they expect that western support will also be provided in the future, but military experts evaluate this statement in different ways, someone says that his statement was directed at a western audience. it was right to say that we only have plan a, so that our western partners understand that we are counting on them, and on the other hand, there are ukrainians who read this, and they are actually shocked, because well, any he

andriy. must enter data immediately in the edpr and all of them, it is indicative for the whole of ukraine to bring criminal proceedings. on january 16 , the supreme councilpposed to consider the appeal of the meeting of the dnipro district court regarding possible pressure from the sbi. however, the bureau did not provide an explanation of its actions or answers to the requested information. so the vrp was forced to postpone the review. we turned to the state. bureau of investigation regarding their explanations regarding the circumstances of conducting such searches, urgent searches, in connection with the above, i consider it necessary to fully clarify these circumstances and the adoption of an objective decision based on the results of the appeal and meetings of judges and judges, postpone consideration of this issue. before receiving the requested information of the documents , we also sent an information request to the state bureau of investigation with a request to explain the actions of the bureau employees during the search, but like the supreme council of justice , we have not yet received an answer, so we will continue to follow this story and

sociological studies have given us such information that the majority of ukrainians are in favor of resuming broadcasts of supreme meetings. council of ukraineon the one hand, i understand that there is some kind of security situation here, that the enemies should not know when the meeting is taking place, on the other hand, i understand that there may still be people in the council who can report, if anyone is interested, when meetings are held there, well , look, a huge number of these so-called hopezahists work there, in each of them, each of them has a minimum of four assistants there and a little over 30 freelance assistants there, you see, and all these people also know when the meeting is taking place, so to say that no one knows when in... this meeting , it's funny, the broadcasts are not made simply so that you can make unpopular decisions, not only unpopular, but sometimes absurd, and so that people do not see the way in which these decisions are made, so that later in the telethon, without giving the word of the opposition, to manipulate public opinion, is the only reason in the absence of a broadcast, there is no other, and final

largest in the entire history of the judicial system of ukraine, became operational. 19 people for one place, 16 selected through a tough competition, members of the supreme judicial councile for forming the judicial corps, transferring judges from one court to another, as well as ensuring their proper level, in particular through qualification evaluation. currently, the sccc has two priority tasks: to complete the qualification evaluation and to appoint more than 2,500 judges, who are in short supply has currently caused a real crisis and overloading of judges, about 200 vacancies must be filled by the higher qualification commission of judges in one way or another, including the selection announced for about 100 judicial positions, and this is quite significant and in the appellate instance. and in the first place, and this is a rather significant opportunity to both update the system and, let’s say, to sanction what we had before, how the higher commission of stakes treats the assessment of certain aspects of integrity is of fundamental importance, both in order to finally remove from the court the system of those judges who are not worthy to be judges, and so in order

the people's deputies of the factions that turn their backs on me, i don't need your quota as the deputy chairman of the supreme committee this is what happened yesterday in the session hall of the council of ukraineon national security, defense and intelligence, when stefanchuk did not want to bring the issue of bezoku to the consideration of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. regarding the dismissal from the position of the deputy head of the parliamentary committee, the fact that he closed the session so quickly, does it generally contribute to consolidation within the walls of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, well, especially before such a vote on such important draft laws as on mobilization, or is this arrogance, it was and remains a sign of power, of the unified power and of the unified party, which is now up to... in absolutely all authorities, well, i think the situation is improving now, and there is no longer such a strong confrontation between the president and the commander-in-chief, which all the media wrote about, we we don't know what it was like and how much it was, but at least what was written about it, we saw it, and the very activity of maryana, which testified, she was the personifi

year of further steps to solve the problem that threatens the national security of the state, the president of ukraine and the government should develop and submit for consideration in the supreme councilve initiatives developed by the public movement manifesto 42 with the involvement of leading lawyers, aimed at limiting the abuse of power by werewolves in uniform, during searches, arrests, accounts and property. one more story, mr. serhiy, the government and business, that is , the government and journalists, the government and business, there is also the government and the opposition, but we will not talk about it during this broadcast, because yes... he said that there is no opposition , that is, this is the impression that i simply got into the times of yanukovych, when there was no opposition, all the people of donetsk were around, in terms of business, what do you think about all this? i think that now it is necessary to make every effort so that business remains in ukraine, i think that those people who are currently engaged in business in ukraine are actually heroic, well, for sure, well, definitely second only to the armed forces, because now they... the conditions are someho

introduced as an urgent matter by the supreme commander-in-chief, the president of ukraine after the discussion at the closed session of the national security councilter the discussion at... rates of the supreme commander-in-chief. and fourth, what you said. it is no one's fault to raise doubts about the fairness of the bill. any person should clearly and confidently say that it is fair, an official, a law enforcement officer, anyone, absolutely equal when it comes to protecting the country. everyone's responsibility, everyone's personal responsibility. the participation of everyone in the defense of the country is foreseen, scheduled, and it is fair, so when these four points are observed, the absence of political debates, debates, understanding the need to support the armed forces of ukraine, the personal input of the supreme commanders -in-chief by the president of ukraine and the justice that this law has caused in society, then i am convinced that it will be the consensus that will unite society, and not... not the other way around will cause discussions again, well, but on the other hand, there is information that can contribute to it, whethe

destroying the pro-russian forces in the parliament, and that the opzh is still sitting almost in its entirety in this supreme council of ukraine, and we understand that they there will be more undertones. because if they leave these 17 there, including the majoritarians, obviously we will have to look for votes somewhere, the servant of the people does not want european solidarity and homeland in this conditional coalition, but will there really be such a collapse in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, also because, in principle, most decisions are not made by the verkhovna rada of ukraine and not within the walls of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. i will answer as follows: if mr. tyshchenko has such serious and proven information, then i hope that after he already published it on the air, he turned to the law enforcement agencies, having certain evidence, having certain documents, because it 's simple, well, it's a sensation, if they act... people's deputies of ukraine received money from russia in order for them to draw up mandates, well, this requires a very, very serious, thorough study. so simple to say, to say, i think it woul

the head of the supreme council of the ukrainian soviet socialism... well, this is valentina shevchenko, i understood, thank you, mr. oleksiy, for the conversation, it was oleksiy goncharenko, people's deputy of ukrainerasbourg, friends, we are working live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us on these platforms , please like this video so that it can be trended on youtube and facebook, and take part in our survey, we are asking you about this today. do you support multiple citizenship?

the supreme soviet of ukraine, clearly unsettled western diplomacy; in order to regroup, it was necessary to gain time, in this they were helped by the envoy of france, which now chairs the un security council urgent meeting from russia was rejected by him the day before; they gathered only a day later, although they could should have been hot on the trail, and so that the french public would have no illusions regarding... involvement in the organization of this terrorist act, although now they are trying to refute this information in every possible way, we the ukrainian general staff immediately recognized ours and immediately asked to convene an emergency meeting of the security council at the same day january 24, but the french presidency categorically refused, scheduling a meeting that we requested at the last minute in the evening. january 5, we regret that french diplomacy put the interests of nato and the puppets from kiev above the obligations of the chairman of the un security council, thereby causing serious damage to its international reputation. mr. chairman, we urge you to think about whether such a game is worth the candle? i would like to speak in tolstoy’s language, but unfo

the security service of ukraine confirmed lviv's russian citizenship. however, he himself continues to assure that he does not have a passport of the aggressor country. on tuesday, the supreme councilof justice dismissed 325. 293 judges were dismissed in connection with the submission of resignations. due to special circumstances, the supreme court dismissed only seven judges, six of them for committing a significant disciplinary offense and one judge on the recommendation of the higher qualification commission of judges of ukraine. last year as a candidate for the european union, ukraine fulfilled four of the seven criteria required by the council of the eu to maintain its status. in particular, the judicial reform has been fully implemented in terms of holding competitions for judicial governance bodies. with the participation of international experts, the supreme council of justice and the higher qualification commission of judges were updated. but while the judicial system is rebooted to meet the high international standards of justice, the ukrainian power structures operate according to the old schemes (force). last week the staff the state bureau of investigation raided the d

the constitutional court of ukraine annulled the article for unreliable declaration. regarding the elected judge of the grand chamber of the supreme court serhiy pogribny, there is also a negative conclusion of the public councilue. it, in particular, refers to his decision with signs of political influence regarding illegal construction on the odesa coast and transfers. land of the kyiv zoo, which the judge allowed to be built in a very quick time in one sitting, 10 days after accepting the lawsuit, the judge also forbade filming in open session, although the parties to the case did not object, thereby violating the principle of openness. last year ukraine, despite the large-scale war unleashed by russia, confidently continued the path to the european union, fulfilled two of the seven recommendations necessary for preservation. the status of a candidate for membership, in particular about the judicial reform in terms of conducting competitions for judicial governance bodies, we talked with the head of the dere foundation mykhailo jernakov and tried to sum up the results of the judicial reform in 2023, a lot was adopted, a lot was completed, that is, those processes were completed, which still began in the 21s

the constitutional court of ukraine annulled the article for unreliable declaration. regarding the elected judge of the grand chamber the supreme court of serhiy pogribny also has a negative opinion of the public councilue. in particular, it refers to his decision with signs of political influence regarding illegal construction on the odesa coast and the transfer of land to the kyiv zoo, which the judge allowed to be built very quickly in one sitting. 10 days after the claim is accepted. also, the judge forbade filming at an open session, even though the party. cases were not contested and thus violated the principle of openness. last year ukraine despite the large-scale war unleashed by russia confidently continued its path to the european union, fulfilled two of the seven recommendations necessary to maintain the status of a candidate for membership. in particular, about the judicial reform in the part of conducting competitions for the bodies of judicial governance. we spoke with the head of the dere foundation, mykhailo jernakov, and tried to sum up the results. in 2023, whether little was adopted or little was completed, that is, those processes that had already begun in 2021 of the reboot of the

ukraine judiciary? but briefly? well, for that, the supreme council of justice was probably created, so that such discourses would arisey could make decisions based on who started them? well, i'm very interested in whether statements like these will be considered in the judicial community, because such statements should be followed by personnel decisions, tomorrow every judge. will be on the air, something dictates what should be done today in some matter, well, what will we come to, well , i really hope that such decisions will be made after all, well, because it is wrong, it cannot be in a country that wants to join the european union and from which the european union demands an end to the adoption of such decisions, which , unfortunately, continue to be adopted in our country. ms. irina, thank you very much for your participation. in our program, thank you for clarifying everything that is happening around this case, it was iryna fedorov, journalist, public activist. well, in just a few minutes we will meet in this studio, i will meet in this studio with my colleague oleksandr moshevko, and he will will tell all the

ukraine. fine production with innovations in svetlogorsk began to produce polyethylene film, enough for themselves and others. belarus and russia are preparing for the supreme state council of union state. orc issues agenda the upcoming meeting was discussed at a meeting between alexander lukashenko and secretary of state dmitry mizintsev. we have always stated that we are working well here, the conversation will be serious, principled, especially since the day before we will hold negotiations in the so-called one-on-one format, not in a narrow format, we will discuss fundamental issues, if there are any additions to the agenda that has been proposed, we will make the following proposals directly at the meeting of the supreme state council. at last fall's meeting the council of ministers of the union state approved a draft decree of the supreme state council. on the main directions for implementing the provisions of the agreement on the creation of the union state until 2026 inclusive. it is of fundamental importance. this is the support and development of what has been achieved in the implementation of twenty-eight union programs. the new three-year period includes a large

the episodes in pavel lazovik’s studio, take a look. how will we develop? presidents of belarus russia will hold a meeting of the supreme state council of the union state today. in case of budapest's decision to help ukrainethe european union is preparing a plan to undermine the hungarian economy in case of disobedience. hot everyday life in france, paris is preparing for a complete blockade from the outside farmers, security forces are gathering armored vehicles. there is no good life. belarus is now a second home; former residents of ukraine are settling in the ivanovo region. the working visit of the president of belarus to russia continues. today alexander lukashenko will take part in the supreme state council of the union state. at the meeting , the parties will try to look further into how to develop cooperation between belarus and russia. the day before, the presidents had already held bilateral negotiations and discussed alliance cooperation, first of all. within the framework of the supreme state council we will formalize many our movements, i think that we will conduct this supreme state council at the highest level with dignity, it will also say that we have a perspective, we will discuss our u

ukraine only on credit. continue the unbeaten streak of meshkov brest and fight the pirma bears in the handball sekhaliga. belarus and russia are preparing for the supreme state council of the union state. orc issues agenda the upcoming meeting was discussed at alexander's meeting. we will make such proposals at a meeting of the supreme state council. at the last autumn meeting of the council of ministers of the union state , a draft decree of the supreme state council was approved on the main directions for implementing the provisions of the agreement on the creation of the union state until 2026, inclusive. it is of fundamental importance; it is the support and development of what has been achieved in the implementation of 28 union programs. the new three-year period includes a large block of humanitarian, crops and social issues. the document will be presented to the court of leaders and members of the supreme state council. according to dmitry mizintsev, the meeting will be held in the very near future. it is also expected that the government of belarus and russia will report on the work done. the impulse of union integration and industrial cooperation. western s