for some reason have volunteers, got there, for example, the lviv volunteer, the well-known svyatoslav litynskyio is not a politician, or, for example, a topic, or , for example, somewhere in dnipropetrovsk region, or a crook. and i do not understand how highlighting the problems of people who do not have water can affect the security of the country? well, in fact, it is very difficult to explain such logic here, because when we are in fact the 11th year in the war, the year in the full-scale invasion, it's time to set up a mature communication where we frankly tell people: we have problems, we have losses, but we have reasonable plans, yes, we have strategies, how we we will minimize one and the other, and then people will not have a feeling of rejection of this information policy, the approach when we try russian propaganda and disinformation. which was built for centuries, not years, yes, that is, to mention here and there the tsarist guard, but to kill it with our homegrown propaganda, well, as far as i am concerned, this is a loss a priori a losing option, because in a democracy, well , cen