precisely, one of those people who manages , in particular, the force and legal direction - oleg tatarov, in c. well, together, of course, with the anti-corruption court and the corruption prosecutor's office accusations of an attempt yes, er, in the hb, an attempt to give a bribe even then they even asked him to be taken into custody and with a bail of 10 million hryvnias, what has changed now in this case, she is not on time now, she slipped past the deadline , yes, i don't know the validity, and so on. a-a applied to the pechersk court so that it could issue a decision er-e let’s say so is the case a-a under sledstvenno nabu or so on and so on there is another article, not not giving a bribe, which is natural is simply a farce in the help of er decisions , because er, the judge’s decision does not determine the prosecution of the case, the prosecution is determined exclusively by the prosecutor general in this case, that is, it should have been her decision, and it was in such a way as if it were legal - why is she because at that time the main prosecutor was irina indykova, and she w