needs to be appointed, but it is not possible because this person at one time served a summons to tatarovayou understand. and here's how it will be, will they still convince mr. president to fulfill the promised simply, well, according to the procedure, do what needs to be done and it's not because someone somewhere is afraid, because all the appointments, why don't they like it? actually, we're not small children. i think that this very topic makes it very, very difficult for joe biden, only with volodymyr zelenskyi complicates the relationship between the current american administration and the current ukrainian authorities, the appointment of an anti-corruption prosecutor . the restoration of the activity of the acquired anti-corruption prosecutor's office because it was a demand of the united states during zelenskyi's visit to america last year. the person who has already been chosen to be appointed is not appointed precisely because of what you said it is very bad this is very bad for the relationship between the american administration and the ukrainian authorities, and why why does

tatarova, has been strengthened, it is about our so-called law enforcement block, how about that, let'se okay with that. what do you think is happening, and what should we expect ? stronger, it can in no way reflect positively on you and me, er, on ms. tatar, prove it, let's see what i wanted to say, er, what does one expect if you look? well, that's all this week, confessions, return to the garden, confessions on komsaf, yes how can you, my friend, the history of ukraine shows the last seven years to elect positions, it is possible in two years, two months, this is how it was when i elected a successor, so in the 19th year they chose the leaders of the wound itself, the agency of corruption and the third, indeed, the war continues in our country, but there are only a lot of people in the east who say that we are doing our work here. you have to do your work in kyiv, and in fact i said with those words that we still have to continue to make reforms, maybe less radical, we could do it during peacetime, but it needs to be done and it is possible that this should form the future chuchu cou

position of the head of the sap, who, as a detective, nabu, actually conducted the proceedings against tatarovaeresting to watch if there is a proposal to appoint these people. andriyu . how will you vote? well, under any circumstances , i do not plan to vote for any candidate, because i am an opposition deputy regarding personnel appointments. i mean with the opposition, i'll tell you more, it looks like there were no special consultations even with the specialized parliamentary committee, because going back to the release of irina venediktova , the law enforcement committee found out about it like this just like all of us from the mass media. that 's why this is the internal kitchen of the office of the president of the coalition. i can only observe it at the most for now and maybe just give some comments about the currently appointed acting duties because the god of the department i have very there are big doubts that there will be votes for them, because despite everything , the office maintains unconditional control over the majority, and the opposition in many cases supports the decisions

tatarova and now we will look at how and where possible opportunities we will be able to this is the and take it easy. this is the one who headed the ukrbud company, which went bankrupt and did not complete the construction of many houses, and people were left without money. there are bodies, for example, the national anti-corruption bureau of ukraine, and there is also some problem with the appointment of the head, what is going on there, er, there er, the authorities have included ritual dances again. there, at the government level, the start of the competition for the recruitment of a new manager is being blocked . we have had a de jure head for several months now, because artem sitnyka’s term of office has ended, and now it turns out that they can’t even appoint a commission. which is to elect a new head of the nabu again and again i want to write there in which other eh moral breeds and werewolves eh in order for you to appoint anyone here although he does not remain acting eh for a time already elected somewhere he left everything, he is already the deputy head of nasik, he alr

i understand that this place is under the control of smirnov or tatarova in the presidential administrationin the office of the president, and everything else, but we need them to come to this legal process because it will give us the opportunity to get explanation from the authorities and, accordingly, in the future, try to influence the so-called multiple citizenship. as far as i understand the story of dual passports or dual citizenships, it is divided into two stories, one is connected with russia, the temporarily occupied territories and these or other characters who , for example, from active or, i don't know, retired officials or politicians have one or two passports somewhere in a drawer, well, in particular, a russian one, and the second story is this now, that is, as far as i understood multiple citizenship would involve, for example, some gaps and for those citizens of ukraine, i don't know, the citizenship of canada, spain, or any other progressive western democracy, again, the history of citizenship a-a we can ask 10 lawyers with you and all 10 you may be given different answer

and the appointment and that is tatarova from tatariv this and this and this and this and simonenko.nylo believes that such a demonstrative step should take place before the court case against russia

ukraine or the president's office there should pick up the phone, as vitaliy shabonin said, call tatarova and say, please stop blocking this whole story . we are not talking now about the courts, about their justice and about their decisions in our country, we are talking about the fact that the president should just call some person correctly. i love this quote. on the 13th, i prayed on april 15 and 13. the president initiated the immediate liquidation of the district administrative court of the city of kyiv, which now effectively blocked the publication of the decision of the competition commission for the election of the head of the sapik completed its work on december 21 of last year on april 13 of the 21st year, the official website of the president of ukraine commented on how the head commented of the state, its initiative to liquidate aska, which has not yet been liquidated, today i am submitting to the parliament a bill on the liquidation of your court, which was never able to regain trust in itself, but managed to return scandals and strange decisions, far from understanding just

tatarov, who were on his birthday, which was recorded by journalists and also by tatarova well, it iso not a secret, it is public information that mr. klymenko, who was announced as the winner today, but actually made his way to the practical management of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office more difficult, will still be a detective, but mr. klymenko actually investigated the case in relation to e. p. tatarov, this is exactly what they call the main reason or one of the main reasons for not actually allowing him to perform his duties, therefore e unfortunately, the shadow it has to be stated that those institutes that should be independent are where the people who are supposed to be appointed are the most political appointees and those who won contests win and have regardless of political schedules forgive me for the terminology and manage unfortunately it is not like that and everything continues to be concentrated in the same hands, and not in those who, well, if you look at the biography of p. tatarov and the fact that he is an anti-maidan activist, what he says dur

i will remind our audience that this person who was on the birthday of e-e tatarova who if you removehe subtitles e-e under these shots e reminded me how well she knows this situation and these kind of people reminded me of a criminal embezzlement e-e do you remember all the moments mr. symonenko transferred the case of tatarov from the nabu where she was supposed to investigate well, i handed over the case, but i didn’t hand over the documents, because the case was buried in these meters of the sbu. i remind our viewers that it was headed by a close friend of president zelensky until recently, the head of the sbu, ivan bakanov, so you know when we talk about this successful practice in quotation marks so far, it leads to effective effective personnel decisions that are more likely to fail, then i do not expect effective work, i think that it is clear that mr. klymenko was bound by certain obligations, it is clear that he himself said that now it is not possible to investigate, well, obviously, she will be buried and further tatarov, he yermak will manage the appointments and the so-c

it seems to me that tatarova has some skills that she does not have.he has children that she definitely did not have. and skills, and the president needs them for something, what kind of skills are they? how indispensable is a person like tatarov for zelensky, for yarmak, and when he uses these skills ? moral qualities are an ideal tool for the execution of the most disgusting political tasks, they come up with the best one, he sells this one to the president, yermak . by the hands of the law enforcement system and it is very bad for the country in the village because the whole institutions are handed over to the hands of people who decided with very low moral qualities, including connections with the russians because of their prior service to yanukovych, you can't think of a worse story in history and it will only intensify, this is a problem, thank you, thank you, sir yaroslav let 's try to answer my question about the prospects of moving from this week's place, the question of the appointment of a new head of the specialized anti-corruption prosecut