— and some people are more on the technical side? what sir frank was aood at technical side?s good at most business _ technical side? what sir frank was good at most business deals, - technical side? what sir frank was i good at most business deals, getting the engine and the driver deals. he spotted young talent. he had patrick head as a technical guy, adrian newey helped design the cars but he sought young talent. he was a fantastic mind for notjust f1 but the wider motorsport world. he saw people ofjenson button, juan pablo montoya, damon hill, he saw these young drivers and he thought, i want him in my car one day. that is definitely more than the technical aspect. frank was just a really great leader. aspect. frank was 'ust a really great ladenh aspect. frank was 'ust a really great leader. quite a cut-throat business at _ great leader. quite a cut-throat business at the _ great leader. quite a cut-throat business at the time _ great leader. quite a cut-throat business at the time he - great leader. quite a cut-throat business at the time he was - great leader. quite a c

technicals matter, but i'm not likely to trade on it. i respect tom and his technical analyst and he knows that, but i'll stay all in part of this also comes from the fact that the stocks that i own have recently come out of consolidation. so if you look at the surge in the qualcomms and the general motors and the apples of the world. i do not see these as overbought at all so i am loathed to try them on right now. >> this is interesting yes, it comes by way of his chief technical strategist, but there are fundamentals as well that are at play here. so it's two sides to the coin as to why we may be at a near-term inflexion point. everyone has been talking about seasonalities on the side that are right in the middle of now and the most bullish of the year for stocks you carry that into next year or is it time that we have that pause and be ready to buy it >> i do tend to agree with tom here, scott, because if you think about the positive seasonality that we've head in q4, we've had it and then some it tends to be 4.5%. we're up 9%, and i

so working in cooperation with co-ops, can provide information and technical assistance, appreciation for the number of programs available. this allows me to talk about the importance of congress finishing its work on infrastructure and the reconciliation bill. because there are significant resources under any iteration of those proposals to fund expansion of climate smart practices in these areas and it will provide additional personnel to make those local contacts to spread the word. secondly the partnership initiative is a new initiative that will look for partners. we put out a request for information the next 30 days. we will get feedback from folks how to structure the program but we can anticipate activity on that in 2022. it is about making sure the affiliate ourselves with historic black colleges or hispanic serving institutions to bring them into the process by measuring and quantify the results of all this so we have a database to create this climate smart commodity. there is a tremendous opportunity for collaboration, cooperation, bringing this together. it is no secret we

there was about two hours of very technical discussion this morning. we are in the process of reviewing that. >> what will happen? i am curious in the case that you have a difference of opinion about what is an acceptable limit? what is the process to resolve that difference of opinion? meaning, you know, whether you find it too much or how would you do that? how would you resolve that if you don't agree that 40 inches is acceptable limit? >> that is a great discussion. it is very -- it is a series of. it is a discussion among all design professionals. as well as the members of the edrt. we go back and forth. i have seen greg dear line and marco on the team request additional information from the design professional and they are to prove that theory for the engineering design review team and come back and prove it or refute it. it is that process of back and forth. eventual consensus of everyone that we can move forward that results in the decision or the way to go. >> in my line of questioning was to mr. hamburger. the attitude of supervisor peskin as

this is a perfect technical setup. sitting at 50% retrace from this year's high to the lows so i would shop it >> what do you say about woof, the ticker >> i am going to drop this a little too much bark and not enough bite. steve mentioned there was a real boom in terms of spenders spending around pets, rescue animals, additions to the family, things of that nature. i don't think that persists post covid. look at chewy. they have done a tremendous job in terms of their online presence when i look at petco and their setup and what they are trying to do. their move into veterinary and online, i am not sure the growth is there i'm dropping this one. >> tjx out wednesday shop it or drop it >> i am going to drop it i think it is a little expensive. to mow it is an inflation driven story with consumer confidence numbers. it is impactful for the higher ends so i am going to shop this one. >> nadine? >> i am going to shop this one they have good offering for price sensitive consumers. this is not as juicy as i usually talk abo

this is technically an important reason for the agency. why decide of the way decided, but i think it's also an additional geopolitical guardianship and the ongoing discussions with russia and ross. if one makes a move another country makes another move. and this does not even need to have anything to do with energy. pavel says this is definitely a crisis with geopolitical proportions. now, the russians because the supply 35 percent of the gas impulse for the european union have a leverage. but ultimately, their biggest concern is that if they have any future problems with a russian, it means that a huge chunk of the revenues the use to get from the european bucket is going to be massively affected. is this something which is likely to push the russians for a balancing act here? well, if europe needs rush and rush and gas and of course ration needs a you or do russia is supplying natural gas japan to china. but the year that europe is a essential quiet. so russian euro bar tied together there of the future has problems with the c o 2, a si

having a policy background or technical background.initial as an ordinary user for the tools and technology that came out of the silicon valley, the crazy is the one that is so important to me. the big tech company is located here in the valley. partially in seattle. acquiring a grab over our lives. our lives as individuals and citizens in a democratic society programming david, that countercultural attitude of the early age, they have now become the goliath. the pandemic has reinforced this for me at least. we were already aware of some of the problems of big tech 18 months ago. now our lives have become even more in mesh and the decisions made by a very small number of people with a very small number of tech companies. working 18 months ago dependent upon the small number of platforms for our private lives, for our educational lives. the power that is vested in just a tiny number of people in silicon valley announced to private government. that is not serving us, the citizens very well at all. >> taking the technologists point of vie

perhaps some of those technicals are coming into play. let's get more insight into this .k to us about some of the vigilantes. some columnists. you are above 2%. >> i think the fed really has to step out of the way. we keep using the term bond market like it is actually a market. the feds have been coming in and buying in all of this per month. no wonder they cannot do very much about it. without the fed being in the market like that, i think we could see the bond yield easily over 2%. it is steady right around 1.5%. 6 there is a question out there about when the fed removes itself from the equation. and whether it is even in a position to do so. the government backed itself into a corner where for the foreseeable future this is normal. >> i think that is a very good point. because the central bank has kept interest rates so low, we have accumulated an enormous amount of debt. there is an increase in analog rates. maybe even creating the next financial crisis. >> do you think we could get that kind of meaningful shift in policy. without too much disruption? or will this be

that technical work has been done. i glasgow. that technical work has been done-— glasgow., ., ., been done. i suppose the fundamental auestion is been done. i suppose the fundamental question is does _ been done. i suppose the fundamental question is does this _ been done. i suppose the fundamental question is does this keep _ been done. i suppose the fundamental question is does this keep the - been done. i suppose the fundamental question is does this keep the goal- question is does this keep the goal of 1.5 question is does this keep the goal of1.5 degrees, question is does this keep the goal of 1.5 degrees, capping global warming ati.5 of 1.5 degrees, capping global warming at 1.5 celsius alive? that is the point at which scientists very clearly say we are going to see even more dangerous consequences of climate change. 50. even more dangerous consequences of climate change-— climate change. so, we need to see the final text _ climate change. so, we need to see the final text on _ climate change. so, we need to see the final text on this _ climate change. so, we need t

at the same time, we are making use of the technical expertise as we prioritize the safety oversight functions. the faa is also revising the guidance and criteria that we use for determining significant modifications to an aircraft so the proposed changes are evaluated from a whole aircraft system perspective and not just a single part. we are promoting the use of safety management systems internally and externally and with the organization act, the researchers for and identifies safety issues and that addresses the root cause. from my own experience, i know that it works but only if there is buy-in from everyone at all levels of the organization. from the room on the shop floor. at the faa that means when anyone at any level lags an issue, i've got their back. no questions asked. because it works, we haven't let the rulemaking process enter from using it now. currently the design organizations including boeing have voluntarily adopted with six others and as we know human factors continue to be an important part of our work in evaluating aircraft and aircraft systems. we've expanded

apologies if some of this appears extremely technical and complex.

technically we refer to it and one — critical. technically we refer to it and one b — critical.esulting in actions and mitigation _ dog... resulting in actions and mitigation plans will be means to achieve _ mitigation plans will be means to achieve them when internationally... we ask— achieve them when internationally... we ask that — achieve them when internationally... we ask that the tension on this be made _ we ask that the tension on this be made because avoidance is a legitimate technical action and the risk management continuum, which will be _ risk management continuum, which will be cost—effective for all of us in the _ will be cost—effective for all of us in the tong — will be cost—effective for all of us in the long run. both pollution source — in the long run. both pollution source and patch management involves a very— source and patch management involves a very important choice of mitigation action. avoidance or prevention. because here we still can _ prevention. because here we still can may— prevention. because here we still can. may we also point out the fact

have you seen or do you think that there are other barriers around that technical very technical aspect of what we're trying to convoy to public about live fires and what people need to do to get ahead of them prior to the fire happening there -- barriers in the language or from professionals in your perspective? i know i jokingly say, i got into forestry so i didn't have to talk with people, i could just hang out with trees, but now i talk to a lot of people about the trees, your thoughts on that concept of what are some barriers to this translation. the communication. >> i think people don't understand firefighting. it is hard to wrap their heads around. the space that you know civilians and first responders occupy together is becoming broader because these disasters are gettinger worse, where increasingly firefighters are not just putting out fires but they have to educate them 52 people of what to to and how to prepare, that say testify job. there is a knowledge gap. if you are a firefighter and you have seen the really bad fires summer after summer, you understand and know what can

there were also some issues around the partner i do believe from a technical standpoint it is oversold say fundamentally you have to throw this out but there are challenges it is a bit of prove and show me from a technical standpoint we are seeing about 12% upside. you can still buy this >> around the horn steve? >> final trade last night was up about 9% has more room to run >> jeff? >> -- i think there continues to be upside. >> rdsa. >> guy >> expedia >> that does it for us do not go anywhere "options action" with guy will start after this break it's another day. and anything could happen. it could be the day you welcome 1,200 guests and all their devices. or it could be the day there's a cyberthreat. only comcast business' secure network solutions give you the power of sd-wan and advanced security integrated on our activecore platform so you can control your network from anywhere, anytime. it's network management redefined. every day in business is a big day. we'll keep you ready for what's next. comcast business powering possibilities. >>> welcome to "options action." tonight lesso

i haven't technically worked with _ well? i haven't technically worked with the _ well?ell? i haven't technically - worked with the advisory panel but i speak to them often and i enjoy the opportunity to have a rigorous conversation with people in the administration. but i do think that it is an important moment and i do think that today the cdc here in the united states expanded booster access because of fears of omicron and in my mind that is fine for the short term. again i think we should and stand down as needed but i think that we have gotten this a little wrong and that we have not been 100% focused on the initial ioo% focused on the initial vaccination doses. i really literally want to see door—to—door efforts to give the unvaccinated their first doses. we do tend to see headlines about the people who resist and refuse to acknowledge the science but there are people who, given a nudge, given a mandate, to give the opportunity and access and an easy way to get out of work, they will take the vaccine for they will take the vaccine for the first time and that is whe

in fact, the technical analysis supports option two. putting the j in the tunnel at 15 minutes headway. four trains per hour. currently they are running 18 to 20 trains per hour. if we added the j four that would bring it up to 22 maximum of 22 trains per hour. that is well below the 30 that the m.t.a. stated it would be the limit that might create performance problems. supervisor mandelman in a meeting with us suggested put the j into the tunnel right now at the rate of four trains person hour and monitor the situation. if in fact there are negative impacts on the rest of the system we can look at that, make decisions about it. right now there is no data or analysis suggesting that this would be a problem. therefore i think we should go ahead in line with the very strong concerns that valley neighbors expressed. two questions about abandonment. i thought the meeting would be focused on that issue. i will throw them out. >> your time is concluded. all speakers have the same two minutes for comments to the committee. i understand we stil

so i'm confident that on a technical level we are in good shape. and they will make the decisions that they need to make within their systems. >> what you suggested the technical information isan ther there may be other factors utilized by china and russia in making their determination. >> yes, sir. >> a handful of universities including one in kansas, wichita state university, were selected to carry out 124 of the 127 safetyed system human factor analysis, specifically wichita state isal conducting a review an analysis of human error, methodologies, framework, that could be used by industry in the design and evaluation. do you have an opinion on the value of that work? >> it's extremely valuable, and it helps add perspective and valuable research to our efforts on human factors and some of the issues we talked about this morning. >> what's the faa oversight in that regard and what'sin the timeframe for the results of thosehe university -- that university research work? >> i'm not sure of the precise timeframe, but again, this is ongoing work. and

noted we already know that forcing transfers unusually burdens seniors but we know that mtas on technical analysis supports option 2. they provided their restore in the subway which they did not include in their presentation today and it shows that mtas new goal to avoid congestion is 30 trains per hour. they are now 18 trains per hour up to 21 if you count the elusiveshuttles so adding 4j transfer hour would bring us u to 22 . we know this can be restored without harming any of the other lines . i would urge you to be skeptical of the pr after to imply the subway improvements are caused by removing the j. mta hasn't determined theimpact of removing the j and we know the improvements are caused by factors including running half as many trains, running about 60 new more reliable trains , the technical upgrades and improvements to the tunnel and control system made during the pandemic , lack of will train pass due tolow ridership and others. option three was scrubbed on the cta with nopublic input or outreach just 13 business days before the mta vote . decisions made without the benefit of

i ask for technical support. i asked for equipments because we do not have certain things that can help us fight the gangs, the urbanized gangs that tried to take control of the whole sequential support training. not military forces, not a military force. of course closures have. thank you so much for joining me in the front. thank you. the haiti went from being the 1st independent black republic after a successful slave revolt to the poorest country in the western hemisphere. now flooded with international agencies. it is commonly referred to as a republic of n g o z and it has received billions of dollars in foreign assistance. but with issues of political instability, poverty and food insecurity. have it agencies provided a pathway for development or have they created a culture of dependency? joining us to discuss this are a manual, a do yon. she's executive director of police and a public policy think tank in haiti. and jake johnson, senior researcher at the center for economic and policy research, and the le

technically, right? because we are, we, we need equipments, but we need also technical support or the, the, the army also the haitian army. it's clear to the crystal clear to me that we definitely need support. now what true it is. i mean, you're doing good on the ground, just don't one act of fighting force. it can. i mean, i'm not seeing fighting force, not boots on the ground, to actually face the situation. the if you call it was on the ground, but what's to help the military to help the police. so that's what i, i, i asked for. there are different types of intervention, haiti, unfortunately, no, some experience, i should say, some are bad, really bad types of intervention. so i did not ask for that. i asked for technical support. i asked for equipments because we do not have certain things that can help us fight the gangs, the urbanized gangs that tried to take control of the whole sequential support training. not military forces, not a military force. of course closures have. thank you so much for

every state asking for technical assistance formulates with their requests themselves. and we formulated very clear modalities for cooperation and we only received a formal response. so why was our explanation not accepted, this will be my opinion on. so we give to our west and colleagues yet on the so called concerned group. if they would not be satisfied in the course, we might have said that somebody should get a sneak into siberia and poisons. not only the secret may be with that as if it was wrong. but the idea is, since they are driven by a desire to marginalize in russia, politics and b o, b c, w, and they're not concerned who have the health of the russian blogger. and there are many examples to this effect. i've already mentioned that ok, mrs. sugar, let me kind of flip the question right on its head. that what evidence have western states provided for the claim that the volley was poisoned? let's put it back there way. so you only groundless. take the remaining, if you me sadly circulated by the secretariat. that chemical weapons were used on the territory of

so i wanted to understand a bit more about how you develop that understanding of technical expertise around how fires work. >> as a journalist i feel so much of my job is transcending things, helping people understand technical concepts that maybe they don't otherwise . i think particularly when it comes to politics. helping people understand the decisions being made that impact their lives. and then later with firefighting to because i think a lot of people don't understand all that goes into it . i know that even when i started covering wildfires i didn't understand that they often are contained not by using water but by digging certain passages and starting the fire there. so in trying to learn as much as i could about it i went through a professional fire academy with the county of san francisco. it's two weeks i learned about conceptual firefighting, what do the firefighting academy they have me outline and engine and i had to go to put it out so that's taught me how it felt, how heavy that gear was and how hard they were. how the tools actually felt in my hands. and then also j

newt gingrich said we don't need technical expertise in congress, people can get technical expertise in the market. so we have made a systematic tedivisions in the federal government over time to erode the technical expertise and knowledge. that means we put our politicians in the position of primarily receiving input and advice from those that are paid to represent the interest of company so while lots of us are focused on the issue of the privacy legislation or ai regulation or upscaling in the future of work, i don't want people to lose sight of the fundamental task that we have, which is building a democratic system that is capable of governing technology before it governs us and that means thinking about the future of the federal civil service. it means thinking about what expertise we recruit for and it means thinking about the creation and support of independent institutions that represent a public-interest and in our complex system which as we said before is the best technology that we have come up with to deal peaceably in a way that it tries to forge consensus or agreement

we have done a review of our chief scientists and technical advisors and using them as well. but that review is ongoing and i look forward to work with the committee as it is completed. because i think we need to continue to make sure that's a dynamic process. chair cantwell: well, we had a deadline for september 23, 2021. and certainly could have written to congress and said we can't meet that deadline. having a workforce that you know with the technical oversight necessary to do the reviews we think is step number one. and when we look at the lack of technical oversight on certain issues in a changing dynamic aviation market, this is really problematic. and i think in mr. juan's letter, he's basically talking about the fact that 53 people in an oversight office of 1,500 people on such the scale of aviation manufacturing is not enough. would you agree? mr. dickson: we have increased our number of engineers in the basou and our engineers in the production line as well and we'll continue to evaluate all of that going forward. chair cantwell: this is the language i don't like.

but i would also like to say that we also provide technical assistance.understand that not all communities have the ability to hire somebody to come in and write a competitive grant application, which is why we're doing directed technical assistance to our new building resilient infrastructure and communities program. we offered this to ten communities during the first round, and we doubled that to 20 communities, and i've been working with our state partners to help identify those communities who need this type of assistance the most so we can reach those populations that would otherwise not try to apply for this type of assistance. >> administrator criswell, thank you for that. the gao has provided a report and we note the complexity of the application process. the timeliness to grant awards and the technical capacity require to incessantly apply and is a problem. what specific opportunities has fema identified to simplify or shorten the application process? >> again, there is a couple of ways that we can help communities with this. one is through techn

this will sound technicality. it had to deal with the barrel length of the a r 15 style rifle that rittenhouse was using. that he was carrying i so that was dismissed on a technicality, an account set and had to do with a courtesy violation the both of those were thrown out before the actual before the jury began its deliberations. the trial has been dramatic at times, as we've seen, over the course of the days that it was held. there are firey exchanges between judge raider and between the lead prosecutor and the case. thomas banner, while with schraner getting really angry at being a who's trying to basically bring up some evidence. that trader already said wasn't going to be using some testimony that was not going to be a good trial with rittenhouse breaking down when he took the stand. breaking down, getting very emotional on stan and, and obviously the dramatic footage that was his and particularly a closing argument. it's the video of rosenbaum after the shot being laid on the ground, his eyes basically roll

yes, it the technical capabilities are there. peter philip, who works as a technology and security consultant agrees. the technology is more than capable of capturing conversations for targeted ads, but he says most users give these apps permission, owns themselves are very secure and until you give the right away to those apps, right? and sometimes it's, it's, you know, pretty black and white either you opt in or you don't. correct. yes. and, but that often portion is often buried in a 100 pages of legal speak. philip says many times people don't realize they're giving these apps the green light to use their microphone record their screens or view their browsing history. it's all in the fine print, many of us blindly accept when downloading an app. so there's been a couple of universities, northeastern university, get a study of 8000 apps in the google app store. and they found that there are, there is no app maliciously or without permission recording your conversations and using those. so yes, problems are doing that, but not

have been training names for me as i tried to learn it because i'm at the point that the typical technical analysis i don't know about big point after it hit in the pull back in soto i will buy at probably three times higher. >> i'm a little bit different, i'm on for dear life type of person, do not trade and i don't think that way so when you're really asking, ways to get exposed to crypto, so this best way would you can open them of all it and you would on the bitcoin order all coins directly in your name and you hold it to order you alluded to another thing that you can buy in your broker's account if they're work on the both of these a lot of people do not want to go through the hassle of opening of an apology would owners and it out it is not actually hold crypto but of the kind of old, future contracts pretty actually hold the physical because that god allowed it yet. >> you prefer only the physical and only in the coins rather than digital coins printed. >> you and a lot of people actually hold an etf and up in canada i should say, we had etf that hold the physical going find it eas

it's the exact opposite in technicals it was a disaster.g up, it went down the direction is wrong >> mike? >> yeah, i mean, one of the things i would point out quickly is that obviously using call spreads or diagonals does limit your risk somewhat, but the february calls that we are long still have a little bit of premium in them. i think given the fact that the thesis has changed, the sensible thing to do right now is basically collect whatever they're worth and look to sell those in closing position. >> up next, your tweets and the final call when traders tell us how to make thinkorswim even better, we listen. like jack. he wanted a streamlined version he could access anywhere, no download necessary. and kim. she wanted to execute a pre-set trade strategy in seconds. so we gave 'em thinkorswim web. because platforms this innovative, aren't just made for traders - they're made by them. thinkorswim trading. from td ameritrade. (music) meet honeywell forge. analytical software that connects assets and people. to deliver a cybersecure record

in fact, the technical analysis supports option two. putting the j in the tunnel at 15 minutes headway. four trains per hour. currently they are running 18 to 20 trains per hour. if we added the j four that would bring it up to 22 maximum of 22 trains per hour. that is well below the 30 that the m.t.a. stated it would be the limit that might create performance problems. supervisor mandelman in a meeting with us suggested put the j into the tunnel right now at the rate of four trains person hour and monitor the situation. if in fact there are negative impacts on the rest of the system we can look at that, make decisions about it. right now there is no data or analysis suggesting that this would be a problem. therefore i think we should go ahead in line with the very strong concerns that valley neighbors expressed. two questions about abandonment. i thought the meeting would be focused on that issue. i will throw them out. >> your time is concluded. all speakers have the same two minutes for comments to the committee. i understand we stil

expertise in congress, people can just get technical expertise in the market.t we have made systematic decisions in the federal cl government over time to erode our technical expertise and knowledge what that means is we put our politicians in a position that primarily receiving input and advice for those who are paid to represent the interest of the company so while a lot of us are focused on the ai regulations or upscaling the future of work, but i want people to cite the fundamental the happiest building a democratic system, that is capable of governing technology. reporter: governance - enemies thinking about the future of the federal service and thinking about what expertise we recruit for when we elect the politicians enemies thinking about the creation and the support ofhe independent institutions that represent the public interest rather than a private or commercial interest. inr our complex system, which is present before his best technology we can come up with two deal peacefully with no way that tries to have a consensus or an agreement among these c

he said we don't need technical expertise in congress.ple can just get technical expertise on the market, so we made systematic decisions in the federal government over time for the technical expertise and knowledge. what that means is we put our politicians in the position of primarily receiving input and advice from those that are paid to represent the interest of companies. while lots of us are focused on the privacy legislation or ai regulation or upscaling the future of work i don't want people to lose sight of the fundamental task which is building a democratic system that is capable of governing technology and that means thinking about the future of the service and thinking about what expertise we recruit for. it means thinking about the creation and support that represent the public interest rather than private or commercial interest and in our complex system that is the best technology we've come up with to deal with in a way to forge consensus or agreement among the converse views we need all of those elements working. >> buildi

newt gingrich says we don't need technical expertise. people can just get technical expertise in the market so we've made systematic decisions in the federal government to erode the expertise and knowledge and what that means is we put the politicians in a position of primarily receiving input and advice from those that are paid to represent the interest of companies so why go lots of us were focused on the issue of the privacy legislation or ai or upscaling in the future of work i don't want people to lose sight of the fundamental task of building a democratic system that is capable of governing technology before it governs us and that means thinking about the future of the federal civil servant and thinking about what expertise we recruit for. it means thinking about the creation and support that trepresent a public interest rather than a private or commercial interest and in our complex system, which we have said before is the best technology that we have come up with to deal peaceably in a way that it tries to forge a consensus or ag

that technical assistance, that capacity, the a bjork -- absorption, the take.e have more to do on supply, i think your question is key with regard to that kind of technical assistance with regard to the uptake. director pace, please correct me? >> i want to draw on something dr. disbrow said earlier about the spectrum of need and technical assistance when comes to manufacturing capacity in some of these countries and clarify it is not only building some of these facilities, from scratch, but there is existing infrastructure which we might be able -- in addition to some of the other examples, the four net -- finance corporation dealing with the department of health, in places like india and south africa have identified those locales to build on existing capacity in a way that can accelerate getting to scale. i'm not sure if dr. disbrow has anything dad? >> in addition to that, your question -- it is more than just the facilities, you also have to make sure you have people who can work in the facilities, some of the countries where they may not have the experienc