the book of revelation is a key texts. even more prominent our text from peter and paul. the idea being, what the apostles support war -- would the apostles support war? what would they do about going to war? for peter and paul, the great apostles, would they side with the loyalists, or would they side with the patriots? there was a lot of ink spilled over that question. i want to read you texts, we will read these and let's see which side they tend to fall down on. loyalists or patriot? let's start with peter -- first peter, chapter two, verses 13-17. " separate your cells to every ordinance of man for the lord's sake, as free and not using your liberty for a cloak of maliciousness, but as servants of god. honor all men, love the brotherhood, fear god, honor the king." how might that go? ul, the one from pa most cited text any revolutionary time. romans chapter 13. it gets a lot of play in the civil war as well. " let every soul be subject into the higher powers, for there is no power but of god. the powers that be are ordained of god. whosoever therefore resisted the po

the book of revelation is a key text. even more prominent are text from peter and paul. the idea being, would the apostles support war? what would they do about going to war? for peter and paul, the great apostles, would they side with the loyalists, or would they side with the patriots? there was a lot of ink spilled over that question. i want to read you texts, we will read these and let's see which side they tend to fall down on. loyalists or patriot? let's start with first peter, chapter two, verses 13-17. submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the lord to take, -- lord's sake, as free and not using your liberty for a cloak of maliciousness, but as servants of god. honor all men, love the brotherhood, fear god, honor the king." how might that go? here is one from paul, the most cited text in the revolutionary period. romans chapter 13. it gets a lot of play in the civil war as well. "let every soul be subject into the higher powers, for there is no power but of god. the powers that be are ordained of god. whosoever therefore resisted the power, resisted the

so the book is a key text. even more prominent were texts from peter and paul. because the idea being, would the apostle support war? what would they do about going to war? and specifically, were peter and paul the great apostles, would they side with the loyalists or with the patriots? and it was a lot of ink spilled over that question. so, i want to read you a couple of texts and we'll read these and let's just see which side they tend to fall down on. loyalists or patriot. i'll start with peter. peter, first peter chapter 2, verses 13-17. submit yourselves to every ordnance of man for the lord's sake. as free and not using your liberty for a cloak of maliciousness but as servants of god. honor all men, love the brotherhood, fear god, honor the king. how might that go? here is one from paul. which is the most site the text in the revolutionary era. romans chapter 13. it gets a lot of play in the civil war. let every soul be subject to the higher powers. for there is no power but of god. the powers that be are ordained of god. who so ever therefore resist the p

so the book of revelation is a key text. but even more prominent were texts from peter and paul. because the idea being, you know, would the apostles support war? what would they do about going to war? and specifically for peter and paul the great apostles, would they side with the loyalists or would they side with the patriots? and there was a lot of angst built over that question. so i'll read you a couple of texts, and we'll just read these tektds, and let's just see which side they tend to fall down on, loyalist or patriot. let's start with peter. peter chapter 2, versus 17, this is part of that, submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the lord's sake. as free, and not using your liberty for a cloak of malicious necessary, but as servants of god. honor all men. love the breert hood. fear god. honor the king. well, how might that go? here's one from paul, which is the most cited text in the revolutionary remember a. romans chapter 13, and let me say it gets a lot of play in the civil war as well. let every soul be subject onto the higher powers. for there is no power b

an analysis of these texts. that's what the book turns out to be. i want to talk about some of these texts today and how they were represented, why they were important in revolutionary america, specifically dealing with the war. so the next book is on the civil war. it involves a lot more in terms of like the bible and how -- and a lot more texts to deal with. and this one is kind of a -- it's involving a little more computer programming to get to. so okay, i want to start by talking about thomas payne. tom payne's an interesting character, for all times, and one of the most interesting insights he brings us on the bible comes from common sense. most of you have probably read common sense. it was the most -- probably the most read pamphlet in revolutionary america, common sense was written for a particular reason in 1776. it was written to argue that declaring independence, which they later did in 1776, was just common sense. so he was attempting to deal with arguments that everyone could agree on. he was attemp

so the book of revelation is a key text. but even more prominent were texts from peter and paul. because the idea of being would the apolls support. what would they do about going to war. and specifically where people and paul would they side with the loyalists or would they side with the pait pait. so i want to read you a couple texts. we'll just read these and see which side they tend to fall down on. i'll start with peter. first peter chapter 2 versus 13 and 17. this is a part of that. submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the lord's sake. as free and not using your liberty for a cloak of maliciousness, but as servants of god. honor all men, love the brotherhood, fear god, honor the king. how might that go. here's one from paul, which is the most cited text in the revolutionary era. romans chapter 13. it get ss a lot of play in the civil war as well. let every soul be subject to hier powers, for there is no power but of god. the powers that be are ordained of god. who so ever resists the power resists the ordinance of god. and they that resist shall receive to themse

the text is dated september 2, 2016. that's the text, right, about pot us wants to know what we are, would go on. keep in mind there are two dates that matter. the fbi closed investigation into the clinton email scandal two months earlier on july 5th. so technically the investigation was closed on the day this text was sent. and an according to another text, cited in johnson's own report the fbi itself was not aware of the emails on anthony whiner computer that caused it to be reopened about april 28th, there is another text that shows they found that out. that is 26 days after the poe dust text was sent. so if the people sending the text were not aware, they thought it was closed, how could they be talking about briefing the united states on it? the facts simply do not add up to the text having anything to do with the clinton investigation. but what does add up is this time line. three days after that text about praum wanting to know everything was sent, obama was at the 3 g in china february 5th that's when he talked w

please don't ever text me again. we do not know the context of that tweet but anybody who has received a tweet like that or a text message. anyone who has received a text message like that could probably surmise what that's all about. >> jon: it raises questions as to why these tweets disappeared -- text messages, why they disappeared for so long. was it innocuous or something else? >> there is more out there that the inspector general has that we'll probably learn about as time wears on here. >> jon: more fascinating revelations ahead. >> to say the least. rex tillerson departing columbia after a visit to the u.s. mission there. he is now flying to jamaica. but he has russia on his mind. exclusive interview with fox news he said russia is trying to meddle with our elections again. this time they are going after the mid-terms. and he says america isn't prepared to stop it. rich edson is live in bogota, columbia where secretary tillerson just departed about an hour ago. rich. >> good morning, melissa. secretary of sta

people fall in love on the internet and via text, people bully via text and the internet, and you canrage someone to die via text, and you can commit a crime via text. >> you can look at the various text messages, as well as the psychological records. you will see that mr. roy himself stated to michelle carter, "i want to die." straight up, those words. i want to die. this is not a homicide. michelle carter did not kill conrad roy. it's sad. it's tragic, but it's just not a homicide. >> she absolutely knew it was wrong, and she absolutely caused the death of this 18-year-old boy. and i ask you to find her guilty. >> ms. carter, please stand. >> reporter: the judge's verdict. where will michelle carter spend the best years of her life? when we come back. >> i think a lot of people were a little surprised that that's what actually happened. >> reporter: stay with us. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ the gig-speed network that powers the dreams of america's businesses is now doing the same for america's olympic and paralympic athletes. dream gig. comcast business. >>> june 16th, 2017. decision day at the usually

there are other texts where they are misappropriating a biblical text. i made a reference to this in my talk this morning. take for example uses of new testament language on liberty. americans in this period love new testament texts that use the word liberty. i mentioned galatians 5:1. there are other similar texts. the sun shall set you free.this is more about christian liberty than political liberty. this debate over whether the use of these texts is appropriate arises even in their use in the 18th century. there would be those who said not so fast, that is not about political liberty. we often heard this from loyalist ministers who were calling out these patriots for their misuse or misappropriation of the language of liberty, and there was a back and forth about that. but often the response is that gods understanding of liberty is capacious. there was an ongoing debate, even at that time. an even richer and perhaps much more consequential debate is the one that professor berg mentioned. how do we interpret a text like here is3 question mark where you

having said that, there are other texts where they are misappropriating biblical texts. i made a reference to this in my talk this morning. for example, uses of new testament language on liberty. americans at this period loved new testament texts that used the word liberty. i mentioned galatians 5:1, stand fast and the crisis will make you free. there are other similar texts. they love to quote this. in my readings, these are more about christian liberty or spiritual liberty than political liberty. it is interesting this debate over if the use of this text was appropriate in the 18th century. there are those that say not so fast, that is not about clinical liberty. disking from loyalist ministers who called out these patriots for their misuse or misappropriation of the language of liberty. there would have been a back- and-forth, is it appropriate to use this ng

it that there are no surprises in this draft text. it will incorporate a legal form draft text. will incorporate a legal form hunter and 68 draft text. it will incorporate a legalform hunter and 68 articles, hundred and 20 pages and it will be a legal representation of the commitments that we will enter into in december as set out in the joint report. on the rights of citizens, including the procedures that need to be simple for citizens in the eu and the uk. financial arrangements and the uk. financial arrangements and of course the issue of ireland, which is a very important point. tomorrow as i said the political commitments that we entered into the uk in december will be transposed into a legal text. this is something that we're going to do on one point in tales our responsibility in the european union because it is our responsibility to maintain the single market and its integrity while at the same time ensuring that we maintain all of the dimensions of the good friday agreement as well, we're going to do this by rendering operation backstop, which has been clearly set out

we're getting a text direct. >> you're getting a text from who? >> her daughter that is inside of -- her daughter that's inside the classroom. she's telling her she's about to be evacuated. >> okay, good. good, good, good, good, good. and so her daughter was locked in a classroom? >> yes. >> can you tell me anything more about that? >> even know at this time. >> do you think that was -- was that part of the lockdown process to barricade in place until police were able to come and get them out? >> that is part of the process. the unfortunate news is that we believe the shooter is still at large, you know. >> that's what we're hearing from broward county. that's exactly right. >> i'm outside now. you can hear the helicopters overhead, literally. >> is the school right around the corner from you? >> it is less than two miles. i apologize for the helicopter noise. >> no, no, no. please. so this school, lissette, this is a big school, it sounds like. 3,000 students. is it ninth through 12th? >> yes, it is, ninth through 12th. >> and so i understand --

similar texts. the sun cell shut -- the sun's out -- the sun shall set you free. this is more about christian liberty than political liberty. this debate over whether the use of these texts is appropriate arises even in their use in the 18th century. there would be those who said not so fast, that is not about political liberty. we often heard this from loyalist ministers who were calling out these patriots for their misuse or misappropriation of the language of liberty, and there was a back and forth about that. is it appropriate to use this language of liberty which is more about spiritual matters than about political matters in these political pamphlets. quite often, the response you would hear from the patriots is i think god's understanding of liberty will incorporate political liberty even that we might appreciate the spiritual side. there was an ongoing debate even at that time. i think a much more consequential debate is the one mentioned,sor byrd which is how do we interpret a text like rom

which biblical texts appealed to them and why do they think these texts spoke to them in their own time and situation? a study of the founding generations uses of the sacred text must be attentive, must be attentive to the purposes for which the bible was invoked. and, again, not merely to the fact that they read and frequently referenced it. the founders uses of the bible, they use the bible for a variety of reasons and for diverse reasons ranging from the primarily literary to the profoundly theological. they use the bible as we sometimes -- they use the bible as we sometimes use the bible today, first, to enrich a common language in cultural vocabulary through illusions, phrases, figures of speech, proverbs, and the like. let me give you a few simple examples. in counseling a patient rather than an intemperant approach, john adams wrote to james warren in april of 1776, i quote, the management of so complicate and mighty a machine as the united colonies requires the meekness of moses, the patience of job, and the wisdom of solomon added to the value of adam, end quote put have know a

appealed toal texts them, and why did they think these texts spoke to them in their own time and situation? a study of the founding generation's use of the sacred texts must be attentive to the purposes for which the bible was invoked, and not merely to the fact that they read and frequently referenced it. the founders' uses of the bible, they used the bible for a variety of reasons, and for diverse reasons ranging from the primarily literary and political to the profoundly theological. as wesed the bible sometimes use the bible today, first, to enrich a common language and cultural vocabulary through distinctly biblical references. let me give you a few simple examples. in counseling a patient rather than an intemperate approach to the crisis confronting the tolerate -- colonies, john adams wrote to james moran in 1776 -- "the management of so complicated and mighty a machine as the united colonies requires the meekness of moses, the patience of job, and the wisdom of solomon added to the valor of daniel." you have to know a little bit about your bible to appreciate what is being communic

in the summer of two thousand and four researchers produced a text model a cell phone text message broadcasting system text mob allows activists who are distributed throughout a city term in bergen ised during chaotic street protests or public and convention in two thousand and four was in new york and bush was the president running for reelection on the campaign of continuing occupation. so by this time we had any media sort of tweet like messages single said you know one hundred fifty hundred forty character long messages they were breaking news updates and we provide these every few minutes testers were able to bypass preemptive police tactics by sharing information on undercover officers and police techs mum was a bit of an improvised system but the basic idea was that users would have their cell phones. and they would send messages to a server. going online saying i want to sign up for text mob and these are the information i want i want to be a member of this group and we had this p.h.p. web server. and abused me web server say great what's your phone number and what's your email provider

a biblical text. i made a reference to this in my talk this morning. take, for example, uses of new testament language on liberty. americans of this period loved new testament text. it simply used the word liberty. i mentioned galatians 5:1, stand fast in the liberty christ has made you free. the son shall set you free. they love to quote this. in my reading, these are more about christian or spiritual liberty than political liberty. it is very interesting that this debate over whether, in fact, the use of these texts was appropriate arrives in the midst of their use. there would be those that would say, not so fast. that's not about political liberty. we often heard this from loyalist ministers who were calling out these patriots for their misuse or misappropriation of liberty. there would have been a back and forth about it. is it appropriate to use this language of liberty, which is more about spiritual matters than about political matters in these political pamphlets and the like? quite often, the

were they in a fight, or they have gotten our text messages. don't text me.fect ad national election. steve: i'm sure they have them. brian: is that personal? steve: i think the inspector general could get anything he wants. what we're talking about here are the text messages, between the lovebirds at the fbi last year. ainsley: still employed there. steve: that's right. that was about the hillary rodham clinton email scandal. talk about today. were there people, bad actors at fbi, who misled the fisa court to get an application and a warrant to spy on carter page on the trump team, kind of, back about a year ago? were things said that were not completely honest? well now, after friday, the republicans put out their memo, regarding that. and now the democrats have one as well. but it is much longer and it is much more complicated. ainsley: yes the white house is saying yesterday it will likely be returned to the committee for review this week. so the republicans, theirs was released last friday. will the democrats release theirs? will democrats release it thi

quote: hey, warner texted. can't we do brief off-the-record call today before the letter so i can frame letter? that's what warner texted about steele, who of course, put together as you said the dossier. warner added, quote: okay but i would like to do preliminary call, you, me and him, meaning steele, no one else before the letter just so we have to trail to start. want to discuss scope first before letter, no leaks. waldman noted repeatedly steele was concerned about leaks so warner texted back march 30th, quote: we want to do this right, private in london. don't want to send letter yet because if we can't get agreement would rather not have paper trail. now, the committee got the text from waldman i'm told last september. and warner aide acknowledged warner revealed these texts to their colleagues last october because, quote, they realized out of context it doesn't look great. but aides to warner and burr stressed to me today that chairman, mr. burr was in the loop. the senators just gave us this joint stat

catherine: clinton aide huma abedin was shown a text exchange.nd continue said it had be classified, then asked for her own copy. david: peter strzok's role in clearing clinton and attempts to damage trump cannot be underestimated. he was the fbi chief of counter espionage. he led the bureau's criminal investigation into the hillary clinton email scandal taking part in her july 2016 interview. and it was strzok who changed fbi director comey's conclusion from grossly negligent to extremely careless. whether the trump campaign played any role, strzok then joined special counsel robert mueller's team as a key investigator. strzok finally was demoted after his anti-trump texts were revealed, banished to a human resources position. joining us, gregg jarrett. i not it was important to put together how important strzok is. he's not a small cog in a big wheel. to juxtapose the president's statement about never interfering in any way, shape or form, positive, end of sentence, then seeing that memo between strzok and page is disconcerting. gregg: first of

liz: we are getting more detail on the texts between peter strzok and lisa page on the text about potus wanting to know about what's going on, does not relate to. charles: fbi texts raising questions about president obama's involvement in the fbi probes. but more on the agreement on capitol hill that snuffed out the wall street rally. house minority leader nancy pelosi holding a marathon speech on the house floor demanding a vote be held on daca. the white house responding to her protest earlier. >> we made clear the budget deal should be a budget deal and members of congress like nancy pelosi should not hold our military hostage over a separate issue. we laid out what we would like to see in immigration legislation. it's something nancy pelosi should support, and hopefully she'll come on board. charles: here to discuss, tammy bruce, gina loudon and capri cafaro. tammy, i'll start with you, there is a lot to unpack here. but obviously we want to fund our military. but the idea we'll blot tops off of any fiscal restraint is unnerving. >> this eliminates sequesters. there is no caps on an

each is going to call the other side out and say, you are misinterpreting this text. and we know why you are misinterpreting this, because you think it is going to help your political cause, so there was a genuine and lively debate between the loyalists and the patriots over what exactly does romans 13, this idea of being in submission to those -- and what does it mean? you can understand why this is such a lively debate, because it goes to the very legitimacy of those who suggest that we should resist or rebel against england. so it is a very, a very heated conversation that refined. and so again, it is over the proper interpretation of the scripture and whether we are misappropriating it simply to advance a political objective of the moment. >> thank you. would any one else like to respond? >> i a always perk up when somebody brings up their commitment to follow what the bible says. that is when you have to have somebody there in their hands who is really committed to the scripture and my favorite example of this is a presbyterian pastor in savannah called john soog

this latest round of text, again, seems to be almost irrelevant. it's the earlier text that make more of a difference with regards to the hillary investigation. >> shannon: we are getting information that relates to the fisa warrants with regards to the dossier, looking into carter page. it would gotten a lot more information now from this memo that came from senators grassley and graham outlining not only what we have heard in the house, but it seems to add details of that and some texture to that as well. what do you make of those revelations? they don't seem new, but they seem like they seem to bolster the later memo that came out from the house intel committee. >> if they do at some depth of accusation and allegation to the actual memo. what they essentially allege is there are hillary clinton advocates, friends were in libya who were following information to the state department after hillary left, but there were still people she'd worked with. the state department was then funneling that information to christopher steele who was then practici

three days after that text message was sent.sident obama was meeting with president putin in china. so it is as likely that they were talking about the russia investigation and not about the clinton investigation. there's nothing to indicate it was the clinton matter and there is a lot of evidence. >> harris: that might be a leap too far. the president was offering to reset things when he got back in office. we don't know what they were talking about with regard. >> maria: talking about something they were working on. >> july chris wallace. >> absolutely not true. the clinton investigation closed in july. this text message was sent three weeks later. >> he never got involved in any of this -- he would never get involved in this fbi investigation? and while he said -- >> lisa: we also know they revisited some of the classified information. >> maria: not until later. >> lisa: with anthony weiner and the information found on his computer. look it wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility when you have president obama who also sai

it's in the text. >> kimberly: text messages are part of the element for tonight's show. >> juan: i amaying everybody knows what this is about to accept jesse. who wants to make it -- even -- even today eric holder at a breakfast meeting said president obama never contacted him about any fbi investigations. >> jesse: i don't trust eric holder as far as i can throw hi him. >> tom: didn't we say, play a clip of president obama not getting involved. whether it's about donald trump or the russian investigation, he is involved. >> juan: no. he is saying tell me what's going on with the russians trying to influence an american election. >> jesse: you are putting words in the text. >> juan: "the wall street journal" is too. >> tom: with every bombshell, we are getting shell-shocked. no one is a bombshell. every time you information, new texts came out, we forget about the last one. the best references in these strzok-page text, have to do with hillary. andy's office meeting. new emails came out, the huma and weiner emails. strzok says "will this never end?" he is dying to wrap up this hillary

. >> texting and driving not just a bad idea, it is illegal.how do you keep kids who are constantly texting off their phones when they're behind the wheel? the program to show new drivers were they need to put down their phones now. >> not only is texting and driving illegal, it is also dangerous. >> majority of the teens do it anyway. one local high school trying to stop that with a reality check. >> we've all seen the horrific commercials, been bombarded with stats about the dangers every texting and driving, but it doesn't seem to be working. >> do you ever text and drive? >> yes. >> occasionally. >> little bit, yes. >> let's be honest, unfortunately, too many people have to be scared straight. being personally affected, tends to influence behavior, but it also means that you have to deal with the tragedy. so, quakertown high school decided to try something different. >> so today we have a demonstration from lehigh valley health network. they have a driving simulator it is to demonstrate the dangers of not only texting and driving but distra

just today another trove of fbi text messages became

a lot of people are like why are we talking that text messages between two people. it's not just that the messages are private or how they indicated, it's the fact that they are communicative about something they can actually control. these are people that were not involved in the hillary clinton investigation, but the beginning of the russian investigation and both worked on robert muller's team. >> everything we talked about from hillary's e-mail to the russia collision investigation, some of these figures pop up at opportune moments and ways they could exert leverage. i know they were using government devices which anybody who's ever worked for the government knows that whatever you put there could be subpoenaed, could be brought into court of law. you do not do what they were doing unless you assume that hillary's going to win and no one will care or you're going to be able to cover it up in the we know, ability whatsoever, which they tried. so that's what we've seen happen. the whole carter page fiasco, if carter page was involved in some conspiracy with russia

to text 911 and a dispatch will start the conversation. as you can see a map will appear showing the proximety of the caller but not the address... sothayward p.d.'s launch of text messaging 9-1-1 this week comes of the heels of similiar news from the alameda county sheriff's office sot the two law enforcement agencies join a growing number of bay area police departments merging text messaging technology into their emergency service communication s systemssottwo of the b

texts? >> i am not sure of the specific, but there is some in those text messages that is going to give americans cause

the texts show galactically bad judgment for people in sensitive jobs who should not be texting about if they're joking. it's galactically bad judgment. but you have the president rereading these text messages and reorganizing the planets in the stars without any evidence that they took whatever views they might have expressed in these text messages and actually took them to the office and changed investigations or tampered with investigations or showed bias in investigations. this is the world's greatest body, they used to say. >> i think it is a midwife, folks in the conservative media who want to believe the absolute worst when there has not been an investigation. it's not unreasonable to think the administration might have done bad things, and the fbi agents making some really, really poor judgments here and should be investigated. but i think that the jumping to conclusions is ultimately muddying what might otherwise be a legitimate case, because it all has to go to the extreme level of this sort of discredits any investigation into the president. it just was simply wrong. >> i'l