tham erhnstions riotol o git eofce arntate ve to understand the constitution in light of the declaration of independence. so you had various arguments on all different sides about the nstituti, is itrovery tiveanpecica dienauin tionethfi mpsehaou ses eethfa person for the purposes of representation. you have provisions about the slave trade, about fugitive slaves a different tngs in the constitutn. meplenteretedho ovisns a aipg w sryld ngxin un thrdla"ot pen cotu, r t slaves as person. and that was evidence that the founders intended this document to exist long after slavery had gone away. ininco's wdse un mola o owime nc rslo a i way that would offer perverse incentiv to maintain slaves, thoings like the three-fifth compromise. and so you havthescomping ane meak t okthneryo th a- er dendtive nstiyove rs teonship they saw between the declaration and the constitution. they said, no, look, the declaration's central here. you have to understand what it ys about nural rights wh me at raig thhestio edortoeth clioey. u'adotreon cots recently that have called into question the arguments made by