afterwards the jury wore green. the hitman testified they wore grey. it changed. >> juries pick out what they want to survivors pot their theory the way they think the case should go. i'm not worried about that. and also not worried that they couldn't testify about his training. the jurors know that a 20 year police veteran dealt with day in and day out subduing people and dealing with people when has to arrest them. that is not going to hurt them. >> judge jeanine: here is the problem, the defense in their opening statement talks about the fact that he arrested her and through her down in the front yard within a second and yet the prosecution can't explain that? >> you know what, judge, it is beyond me. i heard what you are saying earlier about pledg prejudicia. it wouldn't be relevant if it wasn't pledg prejudicial. it has to get people so emotionally charged that they rule against him based on emotion. i t -- it just shows that the guy is a stone cold kill. >>> if she was drown isn't it relevant that he was up to his arms in water? >> eliminated the

why can't the jury decide what the truth is? >> it seems like nobody wants to hear their voice in court. kathleen or stacey or any other woman. this pertains to everyone. the hearsay evidence pertains to any victim under these circumstances and their voices should be heard. >> judge jeanine: we did hear that kathleen savio didn't have just one injury. the evidence established 13 fresh bruises, contusions and abrasions all within 24 hours, many within an hour of her death. the blood in the tub where she was found was not diluted by water as it would be in a drowning, it was thick and dark. there was dried blood on her face that would not have been there if she drown in water. there was no blood or are soap ring in the tub. and if she hit the back of her head wouldn't she fall back and wouldn't her arms be flailing? instead she is face down packed into a small tub so tight that her toes are forced against the side in a 90-degree angle position blanched without color. completely bizarre position. >> we had a real strong day today.

the jury has reached a verdict in the trial between apple and samsung. after just three days of deliberations. the two technology giants have locked horns and the end of july, each claiming the other stall the patented technology, which led to the creation of the iphone. if apple wins and gets a $2.5 billion it is asking for come it will be the biggest patent decision in history. we will of course bring you that verdict as soon as it comes in with expert analysis. first, who is really to blame for our poor job market? the government or the ever-growing power that it reportedly gives to the public unions? and explosive new book uncovers the growing influence in all of the taxpayer dime. with more on this, we have mallory factor. this book intercept the world on fire. let's start with this idea of "shadowbosses." i'm not a union member. how is it influencing me. >> well, they are causing the size of government and grow dramatically dramatically. they are not enabling us to get our arms around our fiscal problems. government employee unions are kosher corro

the judge is reviewing what the jury had to say. are going to have more coverage after the break. don't go away, we will see you don't go away, we will see you right back seems they haven't been moving much lately. but things are starting to turn around because of business people like you. and regions is here to help. with the experience and service to keep things rolling. from business loans to cash management, we want to be your partner moving forward. so switch to regions. and let's get going. together. [ male announcer ] aggressive styling. a more fuel-efficient turbocharged engine. and a completely redesigned interior. the 2012 c-class with over 2,000 refinements. it's amazing...inside and out. ♪ join mercedes-benz usa on facebook for the best summer sweepstakes. gerri: we are still awaiting a verdict in the apple samsung trial. it could come any minute. experts are standing by to tell you about it. we will get to that as soon as it happens. in the meantime, we will talk about lance armstrong. it is as if his record-breaking ru

the judge is reviewing what the jury had to say. we are going to have more coverage after the break. don't go away, we will see you right back for many, nexium helps relieve heartburn symptoms caused by acid reflux disease. osteoporosis-related bone fractures and low magnesium levels have been seen with nexium. possible side effects include headache, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. other serious stomach conditions may still exist. talk to your doctor about nexium. gerri: we are still awaiting a verdict in the apple samsung trial. it could come any minute. experts are standing by to tell you about it. we will get to that as soon as it happens. in the meantime, we will talk about lance armstrong. it is as if his record-breaking run is not one of the most incredible achievements in history. he is giving up writing the accusation of using joe. amanda was once considered a hero is now cheap. let's ask our legal analyst, lis wiehl. welcome back to the show. >> is a very sad day for sports. look, if you didn't do it, and then i am juror numbe

the bottom line here is the jury wants to connect the dots. the jury wants the motivation. we know -- >> judge jeanine: but the prosecutor is trying to get there and the judge won't let them. >> is there a chance they can get a conviction here, mark? >> i think there is a chance if they present the foundation before the minister gets on and he connects a lot of the dots because the time frame of the murder is exactly when drew was gone, exactly when coached stacey to tell the police, the detectives exactly what he told her to that i was in bed with you, they got cell phone records. >> if you believe that, though, mark. you have to believe that. it is hearsay testimony. this is not direct testimony. >> neal surey gets on the stand the jury wil believe him. >> he is credible and believable and likeable. >> beyond that. >> judge jeanine: let's assume you that we have motive he didn't want his pension to go to her. and by the way, he got a subpoena just before then to get his pension records, okay. number two, let's assume that drew peterson did in fact try to hire someone to k

what was interesting about the way the jury ruled was it ruled 7-5 for acquittal. one of the members of the jury who later spoke to some of the campaign activists said if i was hickman i would have done the same thing. that is interesting. what is also interesting about the way the jury ruled is an insight into other things was a gender split, five of the women on the jury voted for conviction and the jury foreman, it woman, voted against it. does that tell you something about how people perceive just this? you can see the men in the room looked act as my children are debt, they got no justice, i have to do something and did the women on the jury look at the same thing and just say all there is is a widow with two kids with no means of support? that is the of their side of the question too. that was a bit roundabout but those are the issues that come up with the question of the case. >> wasn't clear to me why the bill was sold frow german in world war i. simply because there were some many germans in the city? >> if he was a political joe allen later this said this

[laughter] ladies and gentlemen, members of the jury, the diverse jury -- very good to see you, wonderful to be here -- we're gathered in the great sovereign state of nevada to decide the fate of wall street as an american institution. in this hearing we hope to discover if on-net balance wall street as a financial institution is worthy of praise and respect by the general public and the taxpayers of this great nation, or should it be consigned to the dust bin of history as a relic of capitalism investment banks, brokerage firms, hedge funds, money managers and the financial service industry, does it serve the public interest, or is it a nuisance that does more harm than good and, therefore, should it be punished and severely regulated and taxed and perhaps even nationalized? in the past year, we have seen spontaneous, smelly protests occur in new york and other major cities under the general banner occupy wall street. now, before this court the prosecution will attempt to show that in sympathy with these protesters wall street has tragically shifted from being a valued, respected and vit

thank you members of the jury. i would like to start by saying that i believe this trial is a farce and a miscarriage of justice. i work for "the wall street journal" so of course i'm going to defend wall street. i would submit that our defense your honor boils down to this. it is the wrong people and the wrong institutions that are being put on trial here this afternoon. now let me start by saying, by making some admissions about some of the mistakes that were made by wall street. we are all angry about what happened in 2008 and 2000 the massive losses. we are all angry at the excesses of wall street and i will acknowledge the fact that mr. frank made that there was excessive paid to ceos, that there were parties held by many of the members of wall street, that there were criminals and crooks like bernie madoff, by the way they are in jail like they belong. but i think it's important to understand that wall street plays an incredibly constructive role for our economy. in fact i would say that wall street is the cen

the jury heard the case, came up with the verdict, and the sentencing. >> after months of appeals and various court appearances, a convicted murderer george huguely will enter court thursday facing 26 years in prison for killing 22-year-old yeardley love. a jury listened to weeks of the emotional and graphic testimony and took a little more than nine hours to render its verdict. the charges are second-degree murder, which the jury remained -- recommended 25 years, and grand larceny, which the jury recommended one year. during the trial, the prosecution presented the case that huguely, after spending the day in a drug haze, went to love's apartment that night and burst through the door and struck her some way causing her death. the defense tried to claim her death was an accident. seems the jury believed someone that huguely never intended to kill her. it will be up to the judge if the jury's recommendation should be held up. he does have the opera -- the option to lower the 26 years, but cannot raise it. it is believe that given the sentencing guidelines, when it comes to huguely, it

that's down from the 26 year sentence the charlottesville jury recommended. the prosecution team is calling it -- they said the jury got it right. the judge got it right. they're considering it a victory. the defense team had been asking for 15 years. live from charlottesville, andrea mccarren, 9 news now. >> did the judge say why he only reduced it three years or didn't go farther because, of course, the seencing guidelines allow anywhere from five to 40 years? did he give any clue as to his reasoning? >> reporter: well, he had faith in the jury's decision. he thought that the jury had acted appropriately given the very brutal nature of this crime, but i have to tell you importantly it is a 23 year sentence, but he's getting credit for time served. generally with good behavior he will serve only 85%. so if you do the math quickly, which we have, he'll probably serve about 18 years in prison. he's now 24, almost 25. that means he will be out when he's still a fairly young man, about the age of 42. >> thank you. >> andrea, why do we not hear from these people b

the jury ordered the company to pay apple more than 1 beside. samsung fired -- $1 billion. the jury found several of samsung's products illully used -- illegally used apple's creations. >> consumers aren't going to be airline to get the fine -- aren't going to be able to use the phones they've seen on the market. this is the first stepping stone in a monster trial between google and apple. google has recently decided to sue apple for a few of its own patents and block the sale of the iphone in the u.s. these guys are huge competitors! and that's going to be the real trial. >> from the start of this trial, legal experts and wall street analysts sold samsung as the underdog. apple headquarters is just 10 miles from the courthouse in san jose, and the jury was selected from the heart of silicon valley. >>> temperatures were warmer out there today thanks to the sunshine. 68 in san francisco, 66 in daly city. seeing reduced visibility in half moon bay. dense fog and drizzle out there through the overnight hours. mostly sunny tomorrow. details on that coming up. >>> my sister saw

at one point this morning the jury heard testimony from one minute before there were asked to leave the courtroom again ... wgn's tonya francisco is live in joliet with our top story: dr. mary kay's a narrow and forensic pathologist was on the witness stand testifying the prosecution asked her how she reached her conclusions that she was going to announce in front of the jury that day she said she used some of the analysis from doctors not listed on the witness list reach conclusions about the death of kathleen savio ... the judge looked up case lot and said he would instruct the jury not to pay attention to any of those doctors' names that dr. case mentioned and the testimony resumed it was only for 20 minutes and the jury has taken a break for lunch ... this is par for the course with this case lots of breaks lots of jurors having to leave the court room ... before court today we asked the defense attorney joel brodsky to give us his assessment of how things are going: >>earlier i said they haven't laid a glove on us ... after what we heard today they got a few jabs in but they did no

prosecutors showed the jury items of clothing. they're the same clothes he is seen wearing at the time of the fatal mall shooting. prosecutors showed the jury surveillance shapes -- tape shown them arriving at the mall. prosecutors have yet to publicly state their motive. police found them shot multiple times outside of nordstrom. baltimore county police suggested that he was a target. detectives -- when someone crosses the gang, or becomes a competitor, a supreme commander of the gang can order a hit. a lower-level commanders carries out. i hit could mean imposing fines. the gang is structured so that the person who orders the head has deniability. those involved are told little or -- nothing about the job. possible motive could be found in public records. court documents indicate that in 2010, he assaulted and robbed a suspected gang member. prosecutors are about to introduce evidence to suggest a motive when the jury informed the judge they were tired. testimony will resume tomorrow. word on's still no whether there'll be a bail

the talks failed so it is up to a jury to decide and figure it all out. apple claims their phone was copied and an injunction that would bar samsung from selling the galaxy. experts say if apple wins other companies have to come up with unique features to dwbs their phones. if samsung wins, it may test the limit of what patents can cover. that ultimately this will be good for consumers. >> once we determine what companies have to work around with each other. then we'll see a reduction of price and more features. >> reporter: the jury will likely begin deliberations tomorrow. they face a 22-page verdict form with 36 questions that jurors must decide. it's in the farm whether they believe that the product in question violates any patents. live in downtown san jose, "today in the bay." >> a former gentech employee is suing saying she was harassed and bullied. natia says a co-work esh made comments, asking her if her family belongs to the taliban and if she was on the nofully list. he told her to chill out and placed her on a medical leave. it says it acted pr

the jury has to see if it captivates in the jury room. they have a cell phone there that says yes or no, it doesn't and check the box. then the next cell phone and the next cell phone. and on and on. and they have got to do this over and over. that's just page one. then they have to decide about the 1 t 915 and as you know, the 163 patent. go down the list again, yes, no, yes, no. and then off to the next page and so on. then they have to come up with damages. these are just regular people so it's going to be a terrible job. this is why the judge in the case has asked over and over that the lawyers just settle. she has pretty much demanded it but not gotten it. >> how did you know i know patent 163 so well? >> one of your favorites. >> thank you, scott. >> keep your i-on 212. >> thanks. 6:04. we now know what's causing glitches in oakland's police radio system. that system is a life line for officers responding to emergencies. christie smith is live in oakland where city leaders blame at&t. christie, good morning. >> reporter: good mornin

judge burmilia told the jury to disregard the redirected questioning in testimony ... witness three has taken the stand and a court trial has resumed it is well under way with more -- our legal analyst terry sullivan is here. there will be no mistrial >>and not today. >>the juror was instructed to ignore some of this explosive testimony yesterday >>this is kind of legal fiction the bullet is out there the jurors know that there was a bullet in the driveway and they confer it came from drew peterson but the judge in trying to correct the record told them to ignore this ... the one thing bad for the prosecution is that the judge went on further in reading his instructions to say that the prosecution did this deliberately when they knew it was inadmissible so whether or not a little bit attained against the prosecution will hang through the rest of the trial we're only through two witnesses and has yet to be seen ... >>so will the judge be more strict on the prosecution ... >>by saying tainted i am wondering if the jury will find the remaining lineup of prosecution witnes

the jury acquitted the family of assault.e was convicted of murder with depraved indifference. >> i never denied shooting charles campbell. i said i shot charles campbell to stop him from beating my father with a bat. is that an act of intent? yeah, you could say so. it's definitely nop depraved indifference murder. >> the da suggested justice was served. >> he was convicted of murder. that's what this case was about. >> i'm happy the verdict came back. i'm happy it came back in the light i wanted it to come back in. but i can't feel victory. two families were totally destroyed. >> but there was something wrong about the kats against richie. two eyewitnesses came forward saying they'd told police that he was acting in self-defense. they said police pressured them to change their story. a new hearing was ordered. in 2006, belle antoni got the case. he was an appeals court judge. >> what i dealt with was whether or not certain witnesses were coerced. if so, whether the jury was made aware of this coercion. >> although some witn

inside the jury room is set to threw out three weeks of testimony discussions were heated one juror told us not until it was over the had a sense of the historic nature of the case the handled a lot of testimony and material they worked methodically but some things stood out like samson's e-mail's. >>> one of the executives said their design purses apple's design the difference was between have an and art they will wanted to make their product as much as possible to light apple. >>> he was using an adding machine to tally up the award >>> i was adding get up it was about 22 items if i'm not mistaken when i hit the = holy smokes. i was surprised what came up. >>> went 1049 so 1049 million >>> how did you feel about that with that number >>> it was mind-boggling to me. we cannot put that number. >>> more than $1 billion, the case is not over samsung vows to fight, and take to the u.s. supreme court if they have to. but we always hear that after trials like this >>> i understand your talking to another juror after the deliberations >>> the jury foreman >>> in the east bay chevron close the

the jury can vote by majority vote. it does not require a unanimous decision. anyone have any questions? very good. [inaudible conversations] >> you have two minutes to answer that question. >> prosecution charged the industry with buying a set of regulations that were bad for the country. >> should we start pacing. >> don't leave. the best part is yet to come. want me to sing for you. did you hear me last night on the street? that will be part of a reason tv video coming very soon. ♪ >> is this anonymous? i am just wondering. >> ten seconds. you guys can exchange names and addresses and facebook friend information after the proceedings. you have to give those to the foreman. >> madam foreman, have you reached a verdict? >> if we have. unanimous not guilty. >> by unanimous contention, stephen moore for the win. >> i am not even a lawyer. >> i will get over it. >> go drown your sorrows. mr moore, you and your wall street brothers have been found not guilty. you are therefore free to enjoy a night in the city of las vegas. and the world known as sins city where yo

the jury actually had to decide on two noninfringement issues and has raised the penalty now from $10 million to $1 billion and 50. the idea being here is that samsung now is going to have to appeal this, because they have to put that money in escrow or put it someplace where it is safe so that if they should lose, they're going to have to provide that money to apple. in the meantime, we're still waiting for the lawyers, for the jury members, anybody who wants to talk to us on this very, very long case that has been going on. but suffice it to say that apple has sent a shot over the bow of anyone thinking about taking any of its ideas, that that's a very bad idea to do. in fact, steve jobs was so livid about this he said he would spend every penny of apple's money to make sure they were vindicated in court. they didn't have to spend much. in fact, they got $1 billion back. more at 10 p.m. >>> right now we do have more details on that ruling as well. again, the major patent violations were found with mobile phones and several devices that came up again and again in the jury verdict. he

assistant district attorney patricia murphy telling the jury, "this is a case about revenge. a case about retrobugs. this is a case about payback." prosecutors argued the father, son and son-in-law ganged up on campbell so that he had no choice but to grab a bat from his car. >> i know chad. when he grabbed that bat, the idea was to just show all right, you all, back on up. i'm not guilty going to start here, but i'm going to finish it. so he swung, i think, once at the father. >> do you think charles campbell could have killed your father, had that third hit struck him? >> sure. absolutely. it was a metal baseball bat. >> if there wasn't a baseball bat, there wouldn't have been a gun. >> prosecutors supported by eyewitness testimony convinced a jury that was backing away. the jury was acquitted of assault. but richie was convicted of murder with depraved indifference. >> i said i shot charles campbell to stop him from beating my father with the bat. is that an act of intent? yeah, you could say so. >> we brought murder charges, he was convicted of murder. that's what this cas

. >>> he says the jury got it right. the judge just shaved off three years off the jury's recommendation, given george huguely the former lacrosse player at uva 23 years. >> also he said that huguely will be out before he turns 40, so he said he will still be a young man when he's out of prison. also, as he said, there is much that he can accomplish wle in the prison system for the next decade or so, serving his time, that this is not a total waste. >>> let's go back to charlottesville. another person is coming out. >> talking about his case and talking about everything under the sun. we've been extraordinarily proud to represent him and delighted to have gotten to know his wonderful family who you heard from in court today. my partner and i are trial attorneys, in and out of the this court all the time. this is what we do for a living, and we fundamentally believe in the jury system and in our courts, but we fundamentally disagree that the conviction in this kay for second-degree murder was at all appropriate and we bakl

>>ut the jury never heard that. l wasn't swinging the bat. another key witness who refused to change his story and was not called to testify was james white. >> they were telling me that other people said this and other people said that. and i said, but i'm not interested in what other people said. i'm telling you what i saw, and this is the truth. >> white was standing inside the deli, and he saw charles campbell, not as victim, but as aggressor. >> they held him down only as long as it took for him to cease attacking. and once he did that, they would let him up. >> white says that's when campbell got the bat, swinging at the father. >> i'm looking at him saying, my god, he's going to kill him. >> the jury never heard that version either. bellantoni found the autopsy report supported white's story. >> one of the things the district attorney's office couldn't get around at the hearing was that the bat was being held upright. the only way you get five wounds with three bullets is this bullet went in the forearm, out t

the bathroom. i don't know what a jury does with that. the prosecution has an uphill battle. the best evidence against him is drew peterson. and his antics, and thumbing his nose at this. when he is up there screaming at people. today, when they were taking his handcuffs off, today, a lawyer said to him, how do the handcuffs fit and he said i requested some handcuffs with fur on them. >>shepard: you have said if this guy had just shut up from the beginning he would not have become this media circus. if he had been quiet --. >>arthur: he would have been acquitted. with what we have heard so far, so far. >>shepard: there is the problem of wife number four who ran away with a man and has never been seen again. theaterror suspects were operational and had a stockpile of explosives. the details on the airborne attack plot next. >> plus, it happened again: chaos in the streets because of a computer glitch. how does it affect small investors? and what want down? that is ahead. [ feedback ] attention, well, everyone. you can now try snapshot from progressive free for 30 days. just pl

the jury awarded samsung nothing. zero on the counter claims. is jury accepted intention that's samsung copied look and feel of the iphone to roll out a line of smart phones. and found patents to be valid and determined samsung willfully infringe ond that property. and apple patents protected an ability

. >> samsung tout the bells and whistle but the jury said it had no right. samsung lasts the landmark patent case against apple. ge. titanic decision tonight in the battle of 2 tech at this time an. the jury found samsung ripped off apple idea and jury needed only three days to reach a consensu consensus. much earlier than many expected. apple didn't get everything it asked for but plenty. jury awarded apple 1.05 billion dollars. apple was seeking 2 and a half billion. as for samsung counter claims the jury awarded samsung nothing. zip. abc fuss reporter joanne stern explains how the decision could affect you. >> after three days of deliberation tonight the jury in the apple versus samsung trial hand out the decision. it was a very good one for apple. not such a good one for samsung. in fact pretty bad for them. jury decided that samsung infringe on number of patent on the smart phone and tablet. that means it copied a lot of feature that apple came up with and the jury said that they should pay apple over 1 billion dollars. samsung did file a counter suit bu

the jury perked up after some lively korver bickering and a cameron of the state's expert witness day 11 is over and there's never a dull moment. drew peterson is on trial because of this man, a forensic pathologist performed the second autopsy on kathleen savio after her body was exhumed in 2007 he rolled her death a homicide he was on the stand for a day and a half and told the jury that the 3 in. gash on the back of her head, the depressing and the left hip area and the positioning of her body in the bathtub could not have been caused by a fall his ruling goes against the report of three other pathologists. it's just one man's opinion there are other opinions. opinions are not facts. and contradicting opinions raises a reasonable doubt right there. the defense attorney called one of his excuses lame and even told him i will give you the chance to take one of your opinions back they also argue directly over objections in front of the jury and were scolded by the judge. we shook hands in the hallway and said he just came down to wish me well there is no personal hard feelings whatsoe

it looks like the jury could be getting close to a verdict after just two days of deliberations. jurors asked the judge if they could put in extra hours today, leading to speculation that they're trying to make a decision before the weekend. this multi-billion dollar case over patents used in apple's ipad and iphone designs could have big implications for the tech industry. here to explain, pete pachal, tech editor of mashable, the web site for all things digital. >> so pete, let's talk a little bit about outcomes. if apple wins, what will come out of that? what's going to happen? >> well, i think what you're going to see is it will have a chilling effect on the industry. it kind of all comes down to exactly what the jury decides, point by point. they have over 600 questions as i understand on the jury form as to what constitutes infringement and what doesn't. but if it comes out more in apple's favor, it's going to be much more-- you're going to see manufacturers being much more cautious with their designs to make sure they're not too close to apple. >> susie: and what about a sa