>> the jury took only 35 minutes to agree on a verdict. >> the jury files back in, whenever a jury comes're looking at every juror trying to look for some hint. and it seems like an eternity, >> and the heart meanwhile now is racing faster and faster and breathing is becoming increasingly challenging. >> this was the most agonizing moment either of us have had in our careers. and in our personal lives. and then the judge asked that the verdict be read aloud. so how's your credit? a loan? i know i have an 810 fico score, thanks to the tools and help on experian.com. and your big idea is hot dogs shaped like hamburgers? nope. hamburgers shaped like hot dogs. that's not really in our wheelhouse... you don't put it in a wheelhouse. you put it in your mouth. get your credit swagger on. become a member of experian credit tracker and find out your fico score powered by experian. fico scores are used in 90% of credit decisions. >>> the retrial of john thomson lasted only a day and a half. the jury took 35 minutes to return their verdict. >> when the jury come back, the judge asked them, has the

up ordinary juries. in the4th century, new understandings of article 29 arose that encouraged a future link to common trial by law jury. the 14th century was again the time of great conflict between the crown and the nobility. parliament enacted a series of statues that were later much celebrated that referred to magna carta and confirmed that a trial following lawful procedures should take place before a judgment. several of these 14th century statutes used a phrase we've heard about from both of our previous two due process of law. which thus became deeply associated with magna carta. the words due process of law do not occur in magna carta. it comes from the 14th century statutes. getting in the tutor period and the 17th century, english writers explicitly linked the phrase "judgment of his peers" in magna carta to common law jury trial. they described this right as an ancient inheritance. the first person to make this link in print appears to have been william lambard in 1581. lambart importantly was an aqu

the criminal jury was unknown and the barons insisted the jury did not apply to them in the most important civil cases. the notion of a jury in the struggle against the royal prerogatives in the 17th century's and suited americans in their struggles in the 18th century. after these battles were over, the civil jury seemed too many to be a liability. the more enduring legacy of magna carta is the one that justice william johnson pointed to in bank of columbia versus oakley. the individual should be secure from the arbitrary exercise of the powers of government. thank you. [applause] >> here are some of our feature programs for this weekend. tonight at 10:00, my copy be on the current landscape. sunday night at 11:00 the political initiative by president lyndon johnson as part of the great society. on c-span3, the professor on the role of the air force on allied strategy during world war ii. sunday evening at 6:00, an archivist tours the a millionaire heart collection, which houses the largest papers related to amelia ehrhardt. finally complete schedule and let us know what you think about t

. >> prosecutor william van story told the jury that the motive was sex. >> his wife was out of town,wife had just had a baby, and so he decided to make a pass at the the mother of the dog. >> and he said, no, i am a friendly person, and with that temper of his, he lost it. >> billy richardson emphasized the lack of physical evidence to the jury, but prosecutors argued that the absence of blood on hennis' members only jacket was evidence of guilt. >> they said that there was no blood because he took the jacket to the cleaners. >> the jacket was a damning piece of evidence. >> and richardson also undercut pat cone who i.d.'d him leaving the richardson home. and he videotaped him in a tour of the crime scene. >> when you start to listen to story, he is all over the place. >> and i brought my girlfriend some roses. >> you brought her some roses on sunday. >> no, it was candy. no, it was roses. >> we kept asking, are you sure about that? >> and he said, well, you are right, fou that i am out here, i probably didn't see that. no, no, no i can't see that. >> but on the witness stand, cone c

the jury. ic verdict. if yand you're talking toevere rheumyour rheumatologiste me, about a biologic... this is humira. this is humira helping to relieve my pain and protect my joints from further damage. this is humira giving me new perspective. doctors have been prescribing humira for ten years. humira works for many adults. it targets and helps to block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to ra symptoms. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. talk to your doctor and visit humira.com this is

. >> we played for the jury the june 12th videotape, where you saw o.j.impson at 6:00, 6:30 in the evening. before the murder. he was kissing the brown family, shaking hands with lee brown. he picked the son up. didn't look bitter and raging. >> so was simpson a warm family man or a violent attacker who cornered and killed two innocent people? jurors and simpson take a field trip to his house and the crime scene. >> it was very good for the jury, i think, to see the relationship of each of those locations to each other as well as to get a much clearer idea of how very, very small the space was in which ron goldman was attacked and murdered by the defendant. and i think this really assisted the jury to understand the jury -- the evidence better, the testimony better and how the victims were essentially cornered. >> what do you remember the most about visiting o.j.'s house, visiting the crime scene? >> that's the first time i've seen a heisman trophy. you couldn't ask questions. nothing was told to us. don't talk amongst yourself and don't touch anything. >

and i think this really assisted the jury to understand the jury better, the testimony better and howed. >> what do you remember the most about visiting o.j.'s house, viting the crime scene? >> that's the first time i've seen a heisman trophy. couldn't ask questions. nothing was told to us. don't touch anything. >> it's this home visit that leads to the very heart of the prosecution's case. the physical evidence against o.j. simpson. >> can you please describe the appearance of the gloves? >> it appeared a dark leather glove, appeared to be somewhat moist and sticky. it appeared parts were sticking to other parts of the glove. >> defense lawyers are eager to point out detective mark furman's role in discovering the evidence. >> and now mark furman came up to you and told you he made some discoveries, correct? >> yes. >> so we're clear it was mark furman who allegedly found this glove out there near kato kaelin's room, correct? outside? >> yes. >> and it was mark furman who allegedly found the spot on the outside of the bronco, is that correct? >> that's correct. >> mark furman would p

the jury. dramatic verdict. [contain♪r door opening] what makes it an suv is what you can get into it. ♪ [container door closing] what makes it an nx is what you can get out of it. ♪ introducing the first-ever lexus nx turbo and hybrid. once you go beyond utility, there's no going back. female announcer: but sleep train's huge year end clearance sale ends sunday.! get beautyrest, posturepedic, even tempur-pedic mattress sets at low clearance prices. save even more on floor samples, demonstrators, and closeout inventory. plus, free same-day delivery, set-up, and removal of your old set. don't wait! sleep train's year end clearance sale ends sunday. ...guaranteed! ♪ sleep train ♪ your ticket to a better night's sleep ♪ >>> late september 1995, for nine long months, the trial of the century has been a national obsession. >> stop domestic violence! >> but a casualty of the constant hype is the freedom of 14 men and women, the jury has been sequestered since before the trial started. >> we were told

coming up -- >> simpson, would you please stand and face the jury? >> the dramatic verdict.emily skinner, each day was fueled by thorough preparation for events to come. well somewhere along the way, emily went right on living. but you see, with the help of her raymond james financial advisor, she had planned for every eventuality. ...which meant she continued to have the means to live on... ...even at the ripe old age of 187. life well planned. see what a raymond james advisor can do for you. hey! gue>>hump day! it is?? hummmp daaay! it's hump day! >>yeah! >>hey mike! mike mike mike mike mike! >>mike mike mike mike mike. hey! he knows! hey! guess what day it is! hey! camel! guess what day it is! >>it's not even wednesday. let it go, phil. if you're a camel, you put up with this all the time. it's what you do. (sigh) if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. it's what you do. ok... so ally bank really has no hidden fethat's right. accounts? it's just that i'm worried about you know "hidden things..." ok, why's that? no hidden fees, fr

here, looks like the grand jury is left in the dark.were not told what the law was until the very end. and in some respects, with regarding self-defense, they were told about unconstitutional missouri law. it just wasn't clear to the grand jury, i don't believe what the law was and what indictments they could return and what evidence they would need to know. >> tony rothert, if the grand juror spoke out, we don't know if it is a man or woman, with a face a year in prison? >> right. this person came to us originally with an interest in speaking out and wondering what would happen to me if i did this. and i think it is troubling -- just before the prosecuting attorney when out and gave an hour-long press conference detailing what the grand jury did, the grand jurors were handed copies of the missouri laws that make it a misdemeanor offense to speak out about anything that happened as part of the grand jury. these folks are afraid, reasonably so, i think, to speak out. also, just because it is a peculiar situation, the person who they migh

. >> we played for the jury the june 12th videotape when you saw o.j.d he was kissing the brown family. he was shaking hands with lou brown and picked his son up. he didn't look like a man who was dire, bitter and raging. >> is simpson a warm family man or a violent attacker who cornered and killed two innocent people? the jurors and simpson take a field trip to his house and the crime scene. >> it was very, very good for the jury, i think, to be able to see the relationship of each of those locations to each other as well as to get a much clearer idea of how very, very small the space was in which ron goldman was attacked and murdered by the defendant. and so i think that this really assisted the jury in being able to understand the evidence better, the testimony better and how the victims were essentially cornered. >> what do you remember the most about visiting o.j.'s house, actually going to the crime scene? >> i was, like, oh, wow! that was the first time i've ever seen a heisman trophy. we couldn't ask questions. nothing was told to us. don't talk

and the jury was determined to listen to the 911 call one more time. very carefully. it's much easier to hear from the confines of a jury room where there's 12 of us around the laptop. it had been a month since we last listened to that 911 call. i think it was imperative to hear it. >> please please. my wife is in the bathroom dying. i don't know what's going on. >> when they listened, they said -- heard a man who wasn't changing his story, but was simply beside himself and utterly confused. >> when you first hear it in the opening. he said i don't know what's going on over and over again. when we listened to it during the end in the jury room, you think this is a terrified man that has no idea what's going on. >> and after eight hours of deliberation, they reached their verdict. >> we the jury of miami-dade county florida, find as follows. the defendant is not guilty so say we all. >> adam's family and friends burst with emotion. >> so what was that like? >> i tell you. i didn't hear her reading it. i put my head down. all i could think about were lina and my kids. i

night. >> i think there's a lot of evidence for the jury to sift through. the trial was 2 1/2 weeks long. tlar a hard working jury i have no quarrel with them taking as long as it gets to get it right and i'm confident they'll do that. >> don tollefson was offered a plea deal 7 months in prison and 14 months in drug treatment program he initially accepted that later he decided he wanted to go to trial. again the jury is expected back here bucks county courthouse 9:00 this morning to continue those deliberations. chris. >> all right. thanks so much, jennaphr. >> still ahead more developments this morning in the flategate. >> plus college students known to party, of course, right? but do they know exactly how much they're drinking. >> the flyers played clearly one of their most physical games of the season taken went into over time. let's go to the wells fargo center. that's a penalty. that's a five minute penalty. chris knocked out of the game for pittsburgh. that started a chain of four fights in the second period.. one of them here with -- it's 2-2 as they

. >> tonight, the jury, the verdict, the outrage. with the police on trial, too. >> who dropped the ball? >> who killed lucy johnson, in the burning bed? here now, david muir and elizabeth vargas. >>> good evening and welcome to this special edition of "20/20" saturday. we start tonight with a question that's haunting a small american town. is a killer still walking free on their streets? because authorities say where there's smoke, there's fire. >> and elizabeth, as you know, this was a big fire, covering up a crime scene. an emergency room nurse found dead on a burning bed. but did she share that bed with her killer? there are plenty of suspects here with secrets to hide. who is it? take this inside look tonight at the evidence and see if you can decide before the jury does. here's jim avila. >> reporter: 3:00 in the morning down hidden meadow court. a warm, sticky night, clear skies, full moon. a peaceful scene shattered by a spark. >> gaston county 911. >> we have a house fire, fully engulfed, 4835 hidden meadow court. >> you thi

could the jury believe david stone? be true. there is no physical evidence of any foul play anywhere at or near that shop. >> reporter: charles capone declined to testify in his own defense. >> and you feel comfortable in that decision? >> yes, sir, i do. >> reporter: prosecutor bill thompson had the final word for the state. >> rachael's gone forever. he insured that her body, her physical essence, is also gone forever. but we can't let that allow him to escape responsibility. >> reporter: after seven days of testimony, the case went to the jury. let me ask you that cut to the chase question. on friday that night at the garage, did you get her down on the ground, did you throttle your wife and kill her? >> i can tell you honestly, no. it's a lie. it's been portrayed as stuff that absolutely didn't take place. i've done many things, you know, that i'm not proud of, you know? paid my dues, moved on, you know? tried to be a better person. >> reporter: this whole thread of this thing, i'll kill your wife if you'll kill min

ever presented it to the grand jury. we also talked about the way in which jurors were allowed to engage in their own investigation. in fact, they had been admonished by the judge -- >> what is an example of that. >> one of the prosecutors essentially told the grand jurors if there were particular clip, audio clips or pieces of information presumably from any source that they wanted the other jurors to see that they had found on their own, they could tell the prosecutor, just e-mail her directly and she would get that information and present it to the rest of the grand jury. and this is after the grand jurors had been admonished by a judge that they were not to engage in any of their own independent investigation, but they were only to rely on the information that was being presented by the prosecutor. and then, of course, it's the preferential treatment of the witnesses. if you look at the way in which the witnesses were being questioned, at one point, you know, we exhaustively went through these transcripts. few yo cove

i'm not sure. >> reporter: but what does the jury believe? out because, as we were conducting this interview, a voice from the courthouse calls out. >> we got a verdict. >> let's go. we got a verdict. >> reporter: the verdict is next. [instructor] just repeat after me. [student] ok. [instructor] nein. [student] nein. [instructor] nein. [student] nein. [instructor] nein. [student] nein. [instructor] nein. [student] nein. [instructor] nein. [announcer] file state online for nine nine nine. federal is free. hrblock.com hesomething awesome.dinner? cool. wisest kid, i need something awesome. to make it awesome, make it "mini." like campbell's® mini chicken pot pies. awesome, mom. get recipes at campbellskitchen.com >> announcer: "20/20" continues with matt gutman. >> reporter: judgment day for pedro bravo. the aguilar family hustles in for a decision. carlos, the anxious patriarch, needs a moment to gather himself. everybody is starting now to move back into the courtroom. christian aguilar's family has gathered here en masse. all day, carlos has l

actually in the courtroom with him, speaking to the jury. >>> 4-month-old ryan stallings had spent an entire weekend vomiting. when he also developed breathing problems, his mother decided to take him to st. louis children's hospital. somewhere along the way, patricia stallings made the wrong turn and got lost. it was a mistake she'll regret for the rest of her life. >>> patricia and david stallings had been married for about a year and had recently moved into a home overlooking a lake just outside st. louis, missouri. david was a printer. patricia worked in a convenience store. 4-month-old ryan was their only child and had always been sickly. after an entire weekend of vomiting and breathing problems, patricia decided to take the baby to st. louis children's hospital. during the trip, patricia got lost and ended up at the emergency room of cardinal glennon children's hospital instead. doctors there performed tests to understand what was causing ryan's illness. he was listless, almost comatose and continued to vomit. >> nurse, let's get that blood right way. >> he was given a complete

now, will that come out in front of the jury? to see. >> even if prosecutors are able to paint this ugly picture of aaron hernandez and his gang affiliation and whatever bill belichick may take the stand, robert kraft may take the stand. they hired this ball to play ball for them. >> we don't know. we know at least with belichick there are text messages between the two. many many many text messages between hernandez and belichick. i wonder what belichick will say. perhaps the text messages if they're close in time to this murder what does it say about aaron hernandez's state of mind. belichick is a really good player but kind of quirky kind of -- i guess off the field a difficult personality to manage. so we don't really know if his testimony will be helpful. quite frankly, i think -- >> he's listed as a prosecution witness. >> i was going to say that. we don't really know if he's going to be helpful to hernandez. >> it's fascinating this case. >> it sadly really is fascinating. it's just hard to understand because you look and s

that is the lead prosecutor in the case making his opening statements to the jury. it's about a 45-minute statement. the defense will follow him with about a half hour. then the witnesses and the rest of the trial, it's effectively on. it's going to be ugly off the top because that's what the prosecution does, they set out the whole case against him. the whole case is not always the whole case. you may think you've got the best goods as you go into that courtroom and a defense attorney can chip away at your case with things called suppression requests. the defense asking the judge to suppress some of the evidence. why can't it all come in? i have the three best minds in the business here with me. it's a strategy. it's a tactics game and it works. in this case, wow, did they ever get a lot suppressed. >> well, they got a particularly important piece of evidence. that was a text message in which lloyd, the victim, said nfl -- >> to his sister. >> to his sister. suggesting that he was trying to tip her off that if something happens to me i'm with nfl meaning hernandez.

>> reporter: after three weeks and more than 30 witnesses, the jury had the case. jury, in the above entitled action, find the defendant paul curry guilty of the crime of felony -- >> reporter: guilty of first degree murder, sentenced to life in prison with no possibility of parole. the jury had reached a verdict on how linda died, but there was still one lingering question. she was smart. she was educated. she had a good job. she could've walked out the door at any time if she thought her life was in danger. >> that was his hook on linda. he gave her what she needed, which is somebody to say, "i love you. i will be here for you. i will hold your hand." that's what he preyed on. >> reporter: look, we all want someone in our lives who loves us and cares about us and tells us how great we are. linda curry, not alone in that. but how long are you willing to stick around for what turns out to be your eventual murder, after you already suspect your husband? >> in linda's case, for the rest of her life. >>> that's all for now. i'm lester holt. thanks for joining us. >>>

and i think in fairness, the jury has rendered a verdict. they found it was not only shocking but that criminality had been proven. this is such a shocking case. vanderbilt is considered the harvard of the south. and for these young men who have engaged in conduct of this brutality is just absolutely astounding. >> did i mention that vandenburg is the boyfriend of the victim? the one who was convicted yesterday, this was his girlfriend. it is so astounding to hear of the details in this case. mel, what's interesting and we're showing him opt monitor right now. what's interesting is that he's not even alleged to have taken part in some of the brutal acts. most of those are reserved for his co-defendant at trial and the other two whose trials have yet to get under way. and yet he got slammed with all of it. does that mean he will be sentenced in a lighter way or will he bear the same brunt as the other conviction? >> ashleigh, i'm so happy you're bringing this point up because it's something that jumped out to me as well. he was the boyfriend.

he didn't have to tep when he showed the jury that it didn't fit. it was a win win. >> he appears to have pulled the gloves on. >> but to the juror david, it didn't seem like a big deal. >> he was about two feet away from me. >> what do you remember? >> people made a big deal about it, i wore truck drivers all of the time, i know that when my gloves get wet, they shrink up. >> after 92 exhausting days of testimony, 58 witnesses, and 488 exists -- >> we have seen all of the exhibits and the people rest. >> next -- >> the l.a.p.d.'s laboratory is a full of contamination. >> how about that? for fastidioun emily skinner, each day was fueled by thorough preparation for events to come. well somewhere along the way, emily went right on living. but you see, with the help of her raymond james financial advisor, she had planned for every eventuality. ...which meant she continued to have the means to live on... ...even at the ripe old age of 187. life well planned. see what a raymond james advisor can do for you. day to deliver your mail so if you have any pack

sue is on it. >> and the jury is out for former fox 29 sportscaster don tollefson son -- don tollefsonhow long they were deliberating from the judge sent them home. >> good day, everyone. >> it's wednesday. >> what day is it? >> it's mike, mike, mike, mike, mike are you asking mike, mike, mike mike what di day it is. >> it's wednesday. >> january 21 2015. >> sue snow, sue? >> i don't want to say it now. >> now i know alex you were not here one year ago do you remember what you were doing mike. >> i was sitting with a sweater on watching the warm in the studio. >> we ended up january 21, 2014 13 1/2" of snow and luckily today's forecast is 2 to 3" at the most. so far this season we've only had little over inch an a half of snow. but i'll recall one year ago we all had involves out trying to deal with second snowest winter of all time. here's today's forecast. giving you a 4 out of 10. morning commute is fine. it's accumulating snow and possible wintry mix mixed in for evening that could give us all a problem later in the day. temperatures for this morning at the bus stop are cold for ki

>> i was involved in the group called juries. but we found and you have to group the group of six people that would end up after deliberating arriving in the middle of a group of six thoughts and that is what we accepted when it comes up in the average median of the group of six but what we founded found in this study is hundreds of juries when the group jurors end up with high air of words often much higher your awards and be a digital member. so in terms of dollars, the juries got more punitive than individuals. we also measured how bad they thought the misconduct was on the numerical scale from zero to six or something like that and if the average individual was at five then the jury came in at six. so people got more outraged if people wanted to punish corporations with 100,000-dollar a word before they started to talk and after they talked to each other they moved up to 200,000. and i thought of this and thought that's kind of astounding that groups and up much more in-depth much more outraged than individuals that compose th

has the jury reached a verdict? s it your position that you think you're hopelessly deadlocked? you don't think any further deliberations would help you reach a decision? >> right. >> okay. everybody's on the same page? all right. ladies and gentlemen, the court will declare a mistrial and excuse the jury. >> the jury's inability to reach a verdict means kunkel's case will be tried again. but not being found guilty has left him energized. >> well, you know what, they're getting ready to go for round two. guess it was a deadlock, so get ready to go again. know what i mean? i was hoping to walk today, but obviously we have some people that believed i was guilty and some felt that i wasn't, so we'll just go back to trial. it ain't no big deal to me. >> how did you feel about the black judge when you walked in? >> i thought it was a good thing, to tell you the truth. >> how come? >> how come? because -- how come? because the majority of the judges out here will send your ass up the river quick. i'm not saying just becaus

evidence excluded rather than the evidence that will be in front of the juryn says these cases, the decisions are made before the jury even hears a piece of evidence. i think in this case he's right. >> i think the prosecution and putting on a repelling case and reminding the jury circumstantial evidence is compelling. i think they can pull out a victory and get a conviction. >> you feel this has to do with sports culture? >> i think it's fascinating. i'm fascinated by the notion of celebrity sports stars and how we expect them to be violent on the field. somehow compartmental leal leal xized. there's so much domestic violence with football players, so much violence off the field. i wonder if that's going to play in this trial. >> i'm going to have the final word and say it's football not the hunger games. >> i like that. >> i don't know if i buy that sunny. >> sometimes they're one in the same. >> when i go home i don't play lawyer. whatever. i'm me. right? let's not go to evidence sunny. thank you. >> thanks to both of you. >>> the fall of kobani to fighter

they asked for the glock to be brought into the jury room. >> we played a lot with the gun.os. >> reporter: after a day of examining the evidence, they couldn't agree. >> my question was, "what happens if we can't make a decision?" i thought for sure there was no way. we were too far apart. >> reporter: the jurors went home for the night. and when they came back the next day, they took a vote. now they were unanimous. the court summoned the cordova and chavez families. >> i'm shaky. wasn't quite prepared for that moment. >> reporter: how did levi look? >> he looked very worried. >> before i call out the jury and find out what the verdict is, i've been observing throughout this trial that there's a lot of animosity in this court room. you can cut the tension with a knife in here. >> reporter: the judge ordered quiet in the courtroom and instructed the families to leave separately after the verdict. >> okay, juror number 51, has the jury reached a verdict? >> yes, your honor. we have. >> can you hand the verdict forms to my bailiff? mr. chavez, please rise. "we find the defend

we have seen very graphic images displayed to the courtroom and the jury. graphic images of the wounds that lloyd suffered when he was shot in that industrial park. the images were shown yesterday. but the close-ups of the wounds were close today and it was simply too much for oden lloyd's mother. she got up, she was weeping, very much distraught. she left the courtroom just like she did yesterday when those photos were shown. and the judge said from now on she will have to be warned when those photos are shown. it is best for her to step outside the courtroom and not be there for the jury to see. but shania was there in the courtroom, weeping in her seat. she's been called by the prosecution to testify about the death of her boyfriend, lloyd. >> thank you. not getting to the meat of anything right now in court. alexandra, we'll update our viewers as soon as the testimony becomes critical to the actual question in the case, the murder of her boyfriend. thank you for that, alexandra, field. >>> things that people are hearing and seeing in the aaron hernandez

. >> >> that groups of jurors often appears much higher awards than the average or middle member. so jury's got more punitive with the individuals and also measured how bad they thought the conduct was on a numerical scale and is the average individual was a five in the jury would be a six sum outrage people got more of rage those who want to punish corporations with a $100,000 reward after they talked they moved up 200,000 or 1 million. that is astounding day end up much more outraged than the individuals. that is something to learn about jury behavior. >> this is fascinating. >> what is happening is if you are outraged to hear that the court -- the correlation is terrible the number of arguments they will hear to suggest that it should be lower would be relatively low. so if you are outraged about united states the you think is hardly you or what general motors is on the president's opponents. if the group is inclined to think that that will push is that way and i have seen the tapes watching it in realtime. with that information exchange that has a tendency towards outrage and we can tal

we will have to see how the jury thinks about or what they think about all of this. >> and interesting, susan, that odin lloyd, the victim was dating the sister of aaron hernandez' fiancee, and they were both in the courtroom. >> yes, that is right. you have the tale of two sisters here. you have the sister of aaron hernandez shayanna jenkins, and then on the ther side the girlfriend of the victim odin lloyd who is sitting next to the victim's mother ursula ward shane shaneah jenkins, and it was almost up comfortable to watch the lack of interaction, don. >> and i want to bring in judge glenda hatchet, and also i want to bring in the judge who presided over other cases. i want you to hear this part of the case where he had been shot. >> odin lloyd had been shot six times, and he had been kill ded and when the defendant and carlos ortiz and earnest wallace left are pr that spot, and they left odin lloyd there and left the evidence at the scene, they took the evidence with them and they created evidence of the cooperative effort and tried to and in some cases they were successful in dest

the jury is expected to return at 9:00 tomorrow morning to resume their deliberations. a union boss guilty of arson, violence and threats to contractors and hiring union workers. and docherty convicted of all counts in his federal racketeering case. prosecutors say he conspired with 11 other members and all pled guilty. docherty faces 15 to 110 years in prison. >>> a robber used a demand note and small silver box with wires produeding from it at a hold up in center city philadelphia. and fortunately nobody was hurt and the somebody ran from the republic first bank after getting cash. >>> and still to come ballistics leads the biden residents shooting in a new direction. >>> and the bridge collapse in ohio with a ripple effect in new jersey. >>> and a rescue coming to the aid in carrage. >>> and i was tracking snow on the way tomorrow and detail on how it affects where you live in the accuweather forecast. >>> and extra sly stallone. and wait until you see the selfie tourists got. >>> and ducis rodgers with the in overtime dramatic fashion with the rivals from pittsburgh

know she's not a killer. >> reporter: the defense also reminded the jury julia was a victim. and as she told police there was a perfectly good reason why that duct tape was loose. >> and if the tape hadn't got wet in the rain i don't know if i would have gotten it off. >> reporter: wouldn't it still pull some skin or some hair. >> it was raining the night of the incident as it's raining, it's getting wet. it's not sticking as much as it usually does. >> reporter: and since it was raining that night, the prosecution had asked why wasn't julia wet and muddy? easy the defense said she was. >> on the video, you can see her jeans are soaking wet. she's not dry. she's got mud all over her pants. which is from the rain and the dirt. >> reporter: the defense also addressed the gunshot residue found on julia's clothes, which seemed to undermine her story that she was behind a wall 60 feet away from where the gun went off. julia's lawyer argued that there wasn't enough residue found on julia to do an accurate test. >> if this had been the fbi lab, any of our military labs they could not

most were autopsy photos, which had been shown to the jury at the trial.so found another set of photos taken just after april entered the emergency room. these were photos that had not been shown to the jury, and it wasn't clear whether john and debbie's original defense lawyers had even seen them. when he compared the two sets of pictures, he made a startling discovery. the pictures of april's leg wound were different. >> the pictures looked like a dog had been involved in this death. ardis sent the photos to a forensic pathologist at the southwest institute of forensic science in dallas. after studying the photos, he said that this child had been attacked by a dog. >> he said i can tell you it's something with canine teeth. what we were able to show how a dog's teeth would just overlay exactly on the puncture wounds around where the place had been taken out of the leg. >> this doctor is a forensic odontologist and agrees that animal bites are often difficult to identity. he says that many animal bites don't look like bite wounds at all because animals of

>> which indicates to me that when she appeared before the grand jury and testified the grand jury determined that she had not told the truth. so that's a very very troubling charge if true. >> reporter: in a statement her attorney davis went on to say "the attorney general has done nothing wrong or illegal and to my knowledge there's no credible evidence that she has. she told the truth to the grand jury at all times. i hope the district attorney will reach the same conclusion " ". >>> and cane's attorney is questioning if the leak to the inquirer about the alleged grand jury decision violates the state's grand jury secrecy law. roaring live tonight in the sat center todd equip nope cbs3 witness news. >> todd, thank you very much. >>> new at 11:00 o'clock tonight, a brigantine, new jersey police officer is indicted on child sexual assault charges. the atlantic county prosecutor's office says that ralph ferrara provided 16 year old with alcohol before committing the alleged acts in both 2012 and 2013. perrara was first arrested last may and released on one hadn't dread thousand dollars bail.

the jury would go on to hear six days of testimony, all directed against kris. ified about the graphic details of the murders he said he had watched kris commit. tino geddes said that kris had asked thoim -- him to fabricate an alibi. and the detective said kris tried to cover up the crime during his interrogation. when the case was finally turned over to the defense, hendon's judgment would again come into question. >> eric said to me that if he didn't call any witnesses he would have two shots at the jury in closing argument. i said to him, but you're not going to do that. you're not going to do that. he didn't answer me. >> eric hendon's defense case for kris would consist of only nine words. >> eric stood up, and said your honor, the defense rests. eric didn't call a single witness. nothing. i thought kris was going to rip the skin off my forearm. >> i just couldn't believe my head. i was shocked. >> it is not often in a capital case you get six alibi witnesses putting your client somewhere else. why did the lawyer not put those on? >> i have never wanted to

so that's going to shrink the potential jury pool considerably. now, there is a caveat. judge o'toole wrote in his orders he has said if the voir dire process does not work, if they find it too difficult to impossibleimpanel what he considers an impartial jury, he's open to the idea of a postponement and/or a change of venue. >> so in essence things aren't over yet. it's not settled this is going to happen in boston but it could change as the jury process continues to unfold. juliette as a candidate for massachusetts governor a few years ago, you said the death penalty should not be pursued in this case and that caught my ear. why is that? >> well i mean all of it is personal. all the democratic candidates were very consistent with where this state is which is against majority of people against the death penalty in this case i thought let's just find out, prove either innocence or guilt and that you take the death penalty off the table. that's just a personal feeling. but my good friend kevin makes a good point about the change of venue argument. everyone realizes that th

the jump -- death penalty and women. who ends up on pro-death penalty juries? > studies have shown you a far more -- the trial is bifurcated. there's the guilt phase and sentencing phase. studies have shown when you have a death qualified jury, and you and up having a lot more people who are likely to find them guilty in the guilt finding phase in addition to imposing the death penalty down the road. in this case, you're more likely to have a jury that only a finding of guilty, but also be willing to impose the death penalty than with a general representative jury that represents the people of massachusetts. >> the justice department announced he would pursue the death penalty in the zone of case last january. as we say, executions at the federal level are rare. attorney general eric holder explained in a statement saying -- what were the government's options and do you see a political decision here in this decision to seek capital punishment? >> eric holder and carmen ortiz definitely have an alternative. they could have gone forward and proffered a plea deal t