it is not based upon the logical propositions. for example, creationism. >> page 391, resister regard intelligent design as scientific theory. you write, many scientists and philosophers of science regard to the stability as an important feature of scientific inquiry and intelligent design as testable in three specific into related waste. >> right. that me back upon not one as well. the first thing it is important to understand, i made it in the book, looking at these two mysteries, the missing ancestral fossils' and how you build an animal, show particularly in the second part of the book that the mechanism lax the creative power to generate these complex animals and especially the reformation necessary to build them. that is a critique of neo darwinism. a lot of people want to know how you get from that to a positive argument for intelligent design? and here is where darlings on method of scientific reasoning was really important are reasoning. i studied darlings method. i think he was a great pioneer. if you want to explain some

of i'm telling the logic it's not about profits at all let me put this question back to them. after the beating thing has come up right need drugs have come up in the market i put this question back to them if you look into the data you will find that most of the drugs which have been researched. have come into the market and nearly once most of them there were more number which came before the phaeton concept came in for example even if you were closest to seymour glass which i think it was early in one thousand eight hundred a wonder what it was that seemed that is preventing you know why not is that the end of it event driven if they don't see profits will it. there's a simple reason they're only looking for profits and that is what my point is i think it's clear. there is a disease that affects the most have multiple parts of the walls or the most or. the less pretty when it's part of a society. then the picks but this one for profit is very low either because the patients can look to for themselves the treatment or because their state their government they are also poor b

>> i'm telling you -- >> the logic of the policy is you're disincentivizing -- >> the logic of the policyankly, is that we are disincentivizing people getting into the labor market by giving them $1.40 for every meal, and we need to put work requirements, otherwise, the government, with its tasty, tasty candy will lure people away from being productive members of society, in an economy that has 7.5% unemployment. it is completely nonsensical. >> i also would like to know, how many lottery winners and dead people, if you're endorsing this policy, how many lottery winners and dead people -- do you think that we are funding? >> but does it really matter? if you're someone who believes in the safety net, which we all do, we just disagree to the extent to which size it should be, don't you think those people shouldn't be on -- you're disregarding this idea that there is fraud in the -- >> here, i think we all agree. the 1% of the people in the latest audit that we're getting, fraudulently, let's figure out a way to not have them get it. >> maddie, we ended on an agreement, on the 1%, and sam s

we ran the risk of large scale opt outs, but the logic was that the environmental benefits were so strong that san francisco would vote with their wallets and absorb the increases. set aside for the moment that there would be dangerous opt out aspects of this program, i feared that such an expensive cca would run the risk of sticking mono lingual and elderly san franciscan with soaring energy bills without fair knowledge. i made those concerns known and staff recommended reducing the rate to 10.9 cents per kilowatt hour. this is still significantly above the original goals of cca to meet or beat existing energy rates. and in order to achieve these savings on the residential rates, staff had no choice but to make th

one point and this is the logical extension of the kind of logic that you were hearing earlier from our liberty that when the marketplace. the rich people run everything basically that you know the workers are screwed virginia and portland had. bought hi tom portman loves you i wanted to say about syria if our government believes they have an ironclad case to lob missiles into a sovereign country then they have iron clad evidence to take him to the i.c.c. indict him try him as a war criminal find him guilty and when he falls which in evidently he will he won't be able to stay in syria and he won't be able to go anywhere else and a conviction on the i.c.c. would make russia and other countries supporting him pariahs if they continue to support him could shut off his international banking could have a lot of ramifications that are very positive from our point of view without us having to commit military force and on the subject of the syrian people since our aid to egypt is negligible and having no effect on our influence and the saudis have already replaced it why don't we repurpose that

involved with the logical institute, upcoming on-line literacy program. he genesis was that if you go around today and you talk to students, kids and say to them, you know, what's the interest rate on your credit card? they'll say is there an interest rate or 10%. they have no idea. budgeting. credit decisions, insurance. cash flow. no idea. if you ask the same kids, what won seven grammys in the last show, they all know. they have the wrong knowledge. what the logical institute is about is to go ahead and basically in an on-line fashion at the person's leisure, go ahead and instill the knowledge that every person -- the basic knowledge on credit, finance, investing versus trading, insurance, you know, you ask someone today in their 20s, you know, what -- do you have umbrella insurance? they don't know what you're talking about. homeowners insurance, renting versus buying, all these the decision we take for granted maybe because we're a little old, this needs to be taught. if you're someone that's going to go ahead and you're a parent buying life insurance

it's people invoking the internet in places where they need to go and invoke logic and good argumentsy just bring up an argument that says, "well, the internet wouldn't accept that," or "this goes against the grain of the internet." well, where is that grain? i've never seen it and i'm not sure it exists, so by putting it in scary quotes, i think i'm trying to make people aware of just how fluid this concept is and how sensitive we need to be whenever it's invoked in public debate. >> in the arab world, you talk a little bit about the revolutions and you talk about this technology being much better at starting uprisings, that people describe as revolutions, but you again draw the distinction, saying that this technology is a lot better at starting the uprising than it is at completing the revolution. what do you mean by that? >> the reason why we tend to think that social media is playing such an important role is, again, because we are focusing only on its power to decentralize, right? and its power to spread communication across many different sub-groups and many different, you know

and ceremony of the logic of the plane has thought it. was going over the seat us and three of the priestesses in the temple area. that when you coffee turn the biggest blow this up to. be known in a good light you can believe in the flame but the high priestess of me says you know many. although not that to eat you. get the see there's two football. field to talk to miss who. can upset the knee any dogma yet if you look silly paulie to tsotsi. you see. media. how do you see the need selling. these east. just the thought most of those make you then. go on the. floor i'm not to say they're limping claim is that. for. the weekend with the you. know. what about what if. there's more to hook up with a. couple . of. things. that i would. never. and i'm a. member . of the club. going to. keep. me. company. crime carrie johnston as we watch the fantastic ceremony have i'm going to hand you over to my colleague marina joshie in just a couple of minutes but stay with us. i'm going to. i'm going to resist and leave. their presentation of the fence

i don't see the logic of it at all and in fact you should ask the people who are telling you to explain that logic to you basically go to court and block the number of genetic companies on a number of different don't know why this is made this has nothing to do with. the pricing going skyrocket if it is not the way filing the case if that is not the case then go back to your office and start working for the benefit of the society why you did based on your time in the courts i. owe it to you. because it is hiv positive and a member of an activist group that fights for access to cheap medicines. he remembers a time before generics entered the antiretroviral drugs market when aids treatment cost almost ten thousand dollars a month. now it costs less than two hundred fifty dollars to two forty dollars per month to put company which is giving it its making profit although it is not giving it for free. it's not giving it no profit or loss also it is making profit out of it and good enough profit. to its employees for them it's very easy to see that all the drugs are not available but for us i

the logic of that surely is that whatever the votes in congress the president will go ahead with strikes, the votes can't change his moral position. >> well, i'm not surprised to find here a well-put question that basically tries to get me to answer something that the president has not decided. so i just have to tell you that the president made a decision based on his gut and his best sense of what was best for the united states of america and our congress and our democracy. and he knew it would be tough. he didn't -- there was no misinterpretation of the vote here. i think that is why the president made a very courageous decision, to go to the congress notwithstanding what happened here, recognizing that in our democracy it was important to ask for the congress to also invest in this effort. and i can't tell you that if the vote had been different the president would have made a different decision at all. i think he was thinking about the best way to proceed and he made his decision about the best way to proceed. i'm confident that congress is going to listen very, very carefully and is

. >> i guess the logic was you place the order and some other factory will fulfill it. >> what is that code for? >> yes, you do subcontracting and give it to other production lines to fulfill the order. wal-mart does third-party audits sew they know exactly what you can produce. >> factories in places like bangladesh are engaged in cut-throat competition with competitors, so it's practically impossible to turn down a major order from wal-mart, because that's the factory's livelihood. >> so to meet the deadline they subcontracted to a manufacturer called tuba. tuba then sent the shorts too its factory. a few weeks later, the factory caught fire. >> oh, my god. couldn't believe. couldn't believe. you know, i couldn't believe. how -- how can that happen? i don't know. so i called kevin, you know, i said look, kevin that factory, you know, caught fire. he got mad, he said what happened? he said why didn't you send somebody to get our things out? >> success appearel occurred simco of subcontracting the order without their knowledge. and wal-mart blamed their supplier, success. but wal-mart

of it at all and in fact you should ask the people who are telling you to explain that logic to you basically go to court and block the number of genetic companies on a number of different don't know why this is maybe this has nothing to do with. the pricing going skyrocket if it is not the case and they find the case if that is not the case then go back to your office and start working for the benefit of the society while you did based on your time in the courts i. already have. hiv positive and a member of an activist group that fights for access to cheap medicines. he remembers the time before generics entered the antiretroviral drugs market when aids treatment cost almost ten thousand dollars a month. now it costs less than two hundred fifty dollars to two forty dollars per month to put company which is giving it its making profit although it is not giving it for free i is not giving it no profit no loss also it is making a profit out of it and good enough profit. to its employees for them it's very easy to say that all of the drugs are not available but for us if if you don't ta

. -- lease let me >> follow the logic. we should all agree that the amount was going to be revenue if this measure , $30 billion, law we should be able to agree that it is $30 billion to the deficit. then fact, if you look at look atmount, if you the june 5 and outcome is says four $3.2 billion over year period time. we have taken out $70 billion that was in another section of -- bill that was incapable we did that rather without batting an eyelash. >> i think 29. >> it depends which one you read. i'm confused, too. do that.xpect you to further questions from the gentlewoman? >> no. >> anyone on this site that has questions? you. you are now excused, sir. 210 hearing portion of hr-3 is now closed. the chairman will be in receipt of a motion from the gentlewoman from north carolina, vice chairman the committee. she is recognized. >> thank you. [indiscernible] it provides one-hour debate. the motion should be considered as red. -- read. the rule provides adoption of the motion. ofprovides for consideration our military act. t

of the inevitability of blowback in the perverse logic of terrorism ever since the us embarked on its so-called war on terror acts of terror and terrorist networks of pulling for raided the recent deadly massacre in kenya is a case in point so is washington's anti-terrorist strategy trying to cure that is worse than the disease. one of the new poll shows on market watch as the polish face. pleasure to have you with us today. the u.n. security council agrees a landmark deal in syria's chemical disarmament with permanent members retreat of consensus for the first time since the start of the conflict a vote as expected on friday. green peace campaigners will remain in custody for two more months while the era tam to board an offshore russian oil rig is investigated the activists could be charged with piracy. and the poll suggests the majority in britain support a ban on muslim women covering up using burkas in the cobs as the debate over traditional religious clothings sparks back into life.

the rest of us. there's a simple logical problem here. if you cut the taxes of business, then they have more money because their taxes are lower. what they do with that money is their decision. and their decision is governed by making as much money as possible. that might mean that they will create a job, ok, but not here. in a place where the wages are much lower--say, in asia--which might be nice for them but isn't particularly good here. or they might lend it to a government or they might play the stock market. or they might do--i don't know-- let's see. what did they do over the last 30 years? the most impressive things big corporations did with the money they saved from taxes and with the profits they were able to get from deregulation, really, one of the most spectacular things they did was to begin to pay corporate executives at the top stupefying amounts of money. we are the leader in the world-- i'm sure you're all proud-- we're the leader in the world in the gap between what we pay our top executives and what the average worker i

we ran the risk of large scale opt outs, but the logic was that the environmental benefits were so strong that san francisco would vote with their wallets and absorb the increases. set aside for the moment that there would be dangerous opt out aspects of this program, i feared that such an expensive cca would run the risk of sticking mono lingual and elderly san franciscan with soaring energy bills without fair knowledge. i made those concerns known and staff recommended reducing the rate to 10.9 cents per kilowatt hour. this is still significantly above the original goals of cca to meet or beat existing energy rates. and in order to achieve these savings on the residential rates, staff had no choice but to make the program cheaper by degrading the quality of greenness of the energy that the cca offered. so, instead of bundled energy and firmed and shaped energy, the commission was presented a contract to buy certificates from shell. they did the right thing then and they rejected this program and these proposed rates. your question, supervisor chiu, is about my objections. well, let me a

. >> it is time for my republican colleagues to do the logical thing, to do the prudent thing - pass your bill. >> time is running out for congress to agree on a budget deal that would prevent a government shutdown. >> u.n. inspectors will be on the ground in syria to enforce the security council's resolution to rid the country of chemical weapons. >> radio communications are being blamed in part for the deaths in june of more than a dozen elite arizona firefighters.

it's helpful to clarify what happens in the other space by using the logic i'm supportive of this one >> yes. i have a question in terms of the product the main product and thrust and focus of this particular establishment appears to be based on a new or more recent type of chemical extraction if you want to say from the marijuana plant itself. t h c is the active part and now we're going to talk about the cd v and it's in capsule form but in terms of the volume the amount of traffic that's generated through our establishment for this project verses the traditionally smoking protrude or perhaps brownies can you tell me the breakdown >> this particular interaction is very unique and it's a highly coveted it's in the medical - the average plant the highest percent is 9 percent. they're able to get the oil to carry about 52 percent cv in it and that's why it's located in san francisco it's promoted from here so we expect it to be the majority and if it takes off it maybe 90 to 1 hundred percent >> i looked it up online and down that what's being advertised on line is a similar thing or t

the same manner that we have done for example in sub-saharan africa. in america. saying that we should stop. i mean that is absolutely a logical isn't it. if you do not give a fair return. again money and therefore investment for future research. because it seemed to twenty percent off the top of the follow companies you spend on. it is not being given by the. trust that husky generated by the company so i think you're to look at it. and not do more because to moral and. from left to copy from anybody. they didn't know want this to argue that. the patent system giving such privileges even having to ration. that innovation despite the patent system for example very few new antibiotics and why do we need new antibiotics we needed for needed infection so you need new antibiotics. why would you invest in a new compound when you put back to the same point again and again and keep extending your profit. challenges that research costs huge amount to be to get a new chemical entity costs two to three billion dollars and the reason is issued degree will feel in the process of. there nor. to prom night is the government's coming to do research on

. >> it is time for my republican colleagues to do the logical thing, to do the prudent thing. pass your bill. >> time is running out for congress to come up with a budget deal to stop a government shutdown. the national security agency could be your secret facebook friend. it is reportedly collecting data on americans through social media sites. >> bad communication is getting part of the blame for the deaths of at least 19 firefighters back in june.

pointed questions, questions challenging the logic, what the effectiveness of a strike would be, questions of where are america's allies, who else is on board with this plan, and here we're just listening to joe wilson of south carolina even bringing in domestic issues of suggesting, alleging, raising the possibility that the president was some how using this crisis to divert attention from the affordable care act and some other domestic issues, from my perspective, a very odd com compilation of charges of this decision to use military force. it was congressman wilson who in a state of the union address called mr. obama a liar. >> yes, have you heard much of a challenge to the intelligence case being made by the secretary of state? >> i haven't heard much on that line of question. >> yes, i don't think they're questioning so much whether chemical weapons were used. it sounds to me as if they're questioning what is going to be accomplished if the u.s. takes military action. how much military action will be necessary. will we be absolutely certain there will be no boots on the ground. i also

after all, if the logic's going to be a total debacle, republicans would let it take effect. t out, come back, use their massive majorities to repeal it, but they don't want to do that. because the gop's fear is not that the law will fail. it's that the law will succeed. that once obama care starts delivering health insurance to millions of americans, it will become impossible to repeal. that's what's happened in every other country. it's what happened with medicare and medicaid and social security. it's why the right needs to sop it before it begins, but the irony of this strategy is that shutting down or defunding the federal government doesn't stop obama care. it might even help it. the nonpartisan research service put it bluntly saying quote, it appears that substantial limitation might continue during a lax in annual appropriations. there are a few reasons for this. first thing, if there is a shutdown, disruption in funding, it only hits one part money. it hits so-called discretionary money. that's the part of the budget decided on by congress. but obama care's main funct

some tonight that will give you an at some point that understanding the thought that went into it, the logic behind it and the rigor behind the financial assessment and so you can see that we are trying to address the constraints of our system, but think of other ways to take advantages of opportunities we might have not thought about before that meet the needs of parents and families and an opportunity to generate revenue streams. we are going through this really quickly and i appreciate that it must be difficult. we spent 5 months working on it and we are happy to go deeper through your q and a and also outside of the meeting. in addition to the 10 recommendations that are highlighted and the road map is what you will see on ellis street moving forward because this is our guide to moving forward. there are other ideas that are kind of throughout the book as you are reviewing it. different ideas at looking at creative pricing and should we have different pricing levels with elementary levels and high and thinking about partners. in the interest of time because i won't have an opportunity to

in the slaughter line and the logic was that. the company employees would be dealing with quality defects you know for example if if it had visible fecal contamination or if if the machine had had. sheen had had gone amok and there were still dangling intestines from the chicken carcass that was the responsibility company because they considered that to be a quality defect so what they did was they set up three pilot projects. and it involved twenty chicken plants. five turkey plants and five hog plants the companies who participated in these pilots self nominated themselves this was not a right this was not a random selection of companies volunteered to monitor ourselves we promise we'll find ourselves good that's right and so and so the plan all along by u.s.d.a. and as i said it started during clinton but you know bush bush was really interested in moving this this process along and actually wanted to do it in two thousand and six and two thousand and seven but got got got stalled but but in the end the poultry plants in the in

it's helpful to clarify what happens in the other space by using the logic i

i understand why, we should, or why the staff wants to do it and what the logic is for it, but the problem here is that there is no good solution. and if we adjudicate it, there is an appearance of inpropriety and we don't, i think that as a practical matter, people will say the da and the attorney general will not take it up. >> and so, i am not sure that what is being proposed is better than what we have which, although, is not perfect, at least has an outside agency to the extent they are findable and conduct an investigation. but i, i have certainly think that it is a tough issue. >> i don't know what the write solution for this will be for this. i can see a referral coming before the commission for discussion. on the other hand, if it is a complaint about a commissioner, i don't see how we could handle that. we could certainly discuss a complaint against staff. but, in the end, i don't think that we would or should make a decision on that because of the basically it is between a rock and a hard place for us. but, in the end, i would say that it needs to be referred to another agency.

alongside to put in the straw and actually declare victory alongside these foreign al-qaeda rebels so the logic behind a we have to strike because the chaos will create more al-qaeda wouldn't a destroying the syrian military create more chaos a great point to say that that's what we call logical thought unfortunately obama's train as like we're children that we don't have this kind of thought process i mean we had of course responded to that speech in a new york times op ed today saying that quote is extremely dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptional whatever the motivation do you agree with assessment and how do you think the concept of american exceptionalism is playing that this policy. you know i think that. the american people have great qualities and for one thing that most of them have good hearts and good intentions and anybody can see that but i think that the point that putin was trying to me which was turned around in the controlled media was that you know everybody should be seen as equal nobody should be seen as an a super to anybody else or apparent to anybod