the trump organization, as they relate to russia. certainly signaling that this, a, investigation is far from over as the president has been hoping it would be and, b, showing that it is going even more at the heart of the trump organization and closer to the president. that's what we know for now. of course, we'll be looking for white house reaction at that briefing, as you said, coming up this hour. >> of course, our washington team is all going sfwast few ii furious right now. jessica, this comes on the heels of sanctions announced today against russia for their election meddling and giving us more insight into the mueller probe. put us into context for us. >> anna, we've seen how wide ranging this regulation is from the mueller probe. this investigation might have been wrapped up by the holidays last year or in the beginning months of this year. as we're seeing with this "new york times" reporting, saying that mueller's team has subpoenaed the trump organization, this investigation is still extremely wide ranging. and what's inter

, and the trump organization. mr. cohen has maintained that he formed that llc on his own, unbeknownst to mr. trump, unbeknownst to the trump organization, that he drafted the documents. >> and that he did it just out of loyalty to his friend, donald trump. >> correct. he expects the american people to believe he spent all this time and energy, hours upon hours doing all of this work, and the president never knew anything about it, and no one in the trump organization ever knew anything about it. we've already produced and you've shown some of the documents on the show. the trump organization e-mails. we now have these documents. the statement that was provided by ms. martin is demonstrably false. if you look at the first document that you showed your viewers, in the upper left hand corner it designates ms. martin as a representative, a legal representative of ec, llc. it's right there in the upper left hand corner. >> and she is a full-time employee of the trump organization. >> she is a full-time employee as evid

the reaction actually comes from the trump organization. right? comes from the trump organization, despite the assertion they're not involved, and this is what it says, working in a private capacity on behalf of cohen's attorney. the trump organization is not representing anyone and with the exception of one of its california-based attorneys and her individual capacity, facilitating the initial filing, the company has had no involvement in the matter. believable? >> no. it is also contradictory. it starts off by saying the trump organization has not been involved. and then it says with the exception of jill martin's involvement the trump organization has not been involved. so they seem to be trying to play it very carefully and seem to be acknowledging she was working on behalf of the trump organization. you say with the exception of this person, we haven't been involved, it means if you include that person -- >> there is an inclusion, that's right. a very good point, in terms of logic. so her signature at this point in time you look at the date d

either the trump organization nor the trump campaign was party to the transaction the trump organization may not have been a party to that transaction but pretty clear one of its attorneys is involved in this case and not the first time she has defended donald trump. here she is just after the access hollywood tape surfaced. >> none of us would ever imagine that he would ever do anything like this. i believe him when he says he didn't do anything inappropriate with women. >> an action could brought without any advanced notice. we are going to talk to attorney avenatti. as previously reported lawrence rosen a new york attorney is representing ec, llc in the arbitration. the trump organization is not representing anyone and with the exception of one of its california based attorneys in her individual cavity facilitating the initial filing pending the pro -- explain this. michael cohen said all along the trump is not a party to this. and then forwarded that to his private e-mail address to then communicate with stormy daniels' former attorney. this is a new trump employee, jill martin, new

this speaks to the organization of the community here. he organized the moravian community inquires -- in choirs. a choir has to do with a cohort group. there requires for little boys come a little girls, single sisters, singer brothers -- single brothers, married sisters, mary brothers, and choirs for widowers. this the group in which you develop your spirituality. this would be the group for you would attend church and have special festivals and services just among that group. salem was always a very religious place. this was established as a theocratic town. the church was the government. the church owned all the land and you own your house and your improvement. ended in 1856 and salem became a regular municipality. brother'sthe single where they would hold religious services. as we have seen in the town in the beautiful architecture and designs in the streets and gardens, the organized landscapes, we know that are permeated the life of the moravians in salem. in this room you can see painting from the 18 century by the moravian painter

it's one of the biggest organic oducers in the country. once big factory-style farms, like this one in, michigarted building porches for their hens, thefl market becamded with eggs labeled organic that most consumers would consider far from that.om >>enterprising very large egg producers saw an opportunity to bend the rules, if you will, or take advantage of unclear rules, ambiguous rules and... and ild to scale. >> reporter: pete and gerry's raises its own hens, but also partners with 120 smaller farms. in its advanced processing facility, it washes, packs, and o ips 1.3 million eggs a day. while it was also cold on the day we visited, all pete and gerry's hens can spend time outdoors on soil when the weather allows. and that's important to people who buy organic eggs. a 20 "consumer reports" surv found 83% "think it's highly important that organic eggs come from hens that were able to go outdoors." and that, says laflamme, means birds roaming on soil, not confined to porches. >> this is just so misaligned with what consumers expect ofga c

tube today we asked the boss of oxfam international one of the world's biggest aid groups how the organization can fix the reputation damaged by sex abuse scandals. would go to fix this i would his and the id industry needs to be full of humility now they are a very very many good i'd workers out there and certainly not a very i'd workers are paid for it but the systematic problem is the culture of the industry the churnalism and just think of oxfam not even reporting it to the local police what was going through they had. in february oxfam international came under scrutiny following reports that some aid workers paid prostitutes for sex while on assignment in haiti back in two thousand and ten two thousand and eleven internal investigation led to the firing of four staff members three others including former country director roland van how were myron were allowed to resign and how are myron has been linked to a similar case in chad in two thousand and six while also serving as the head of the group in the country at the time since news of the scandal broke oxfam has lost at least seven thousa

another fx encourage gaming to manipulate measures to meet the metric target with purposes of the organization so with those surgical scorecards were created to be engaged in creaming or selection bias whose cases with the risk of surgery some surgeons to protect their metrics would respond by habitation go elsewhere or not get operated on at well so that was good for the metric not so good for the metric for those patients who could have benefited from the operation. also where metric sensation in great britain they told hospitals they would be punished unless they were admitted within four hours so one way they responded with long waiting times they would have the ambulance or call the hospital until they could get people within four hours. [laughter] which sounds funny but keep in mind they were people at home waiting to be picked up for the ambulance that was of the metrics could be better so to promote short-term and -- b12 with quarterly profits over long-term investment and research and the education of one half and last but not the measuring takes time with energy and resources from do

so what it requires is once it's served, it requires the receiving organization, in this case the trumprganization, to preserve all relevant information. they can't delete any e-mails, can't destroy any documents. they have to hold on to any information relevant to the investigation. >> as a political matter, this does seem to at least open the door to a debate over the investigation that is maybe the most complicated for the white house and republicans to untangle. every indictment so far you have had the white house defend itself by saying either this person has nothing to do with us or this activity has nothing to do with the campaign. paul manafort is indicted for money laundering. that is not our deal. if this ends with some kind of charge target the president or his family suspect about the campaign but does get at unlawful behavior, that is a tougher one for them to defend. that is the biggest question mark. clearly if there is a smoking gun, that is a watergate level event. if there is a financial crime that isn't related to election interference, that to me is the biggest quest

cnn has learned that special counsel robert mueller has subpoenaed the trump organization for business documents as part of its russia investigation. with this look now at the trump family's business empire, has mueller crossed the president's red line? >>> sanctioning russia -- the trump administration announces punishment for moscow's meddling in the 2016 election, singling out more than a dozen russians already indicted by the special counsel robert mueller. why did the administration miss congress deadline by a month and a half? >>> friend or foe -- as president trump moves closer to blaming russia for the poisoning of a former spy, the white house won't say whether the president, vladimir putin, is an ally or the enemy of the united states. why unwilling to call him out? >>> and deadly bridge collapse -- a walkway collapse, crushing cars and trapping the people inside. rescuers are working frantically to reach the victims. what caused the span to come crashing down? >>> we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situa

up when he has a ugandan that is now at the helm of a british based aid organization what do you make of this argument about the white savior mentality is it really at the crux of this problem. you know what i don't want to visualize this issue i want to talk about power and health of holiday that i grew up in a village where i just walk past bars and see sex workers they would have their children brought to class with me but they would love their children not even identify themselves as children of sex workers they were stigmatized they where they did not have the confidence to stand up in society and be anything they were not being abused by a white person nor so their use of women is global is in every institution a little less awkward for me. as what they were willing to change behind me i came to this organization oxfam as a women's rights activist and now i see there's a momentum to talk about women's rights in our organization and out there where we work for me that said listen that's a good guess and two years from now i want to look back and see that oxfam has changed oxfam i

you know, it's like the head of the organization says handle this, handle that. viously trump wanted credible deniability in this case with the stormy daniels payoff. but whether -- i can also see him saying, look, you handle it, i don't want to have anything to do with this, moving on. if this is business, at least that sounds like the kind of business donald trump does, he's quite proud of the fact that he's with the big deals, right? he's cutting the big deals and the little details are handled by the little people. >> it's a family run business and he's the head of the family. so in that sense, maybe you're right. it's a family owned business. but it's also a business with a lot of moving parts. we saw it in trump university, we saw it in these instances where trump hired people, fired them, and then they sued him and now we're seeing it once again with this story of stormy daniels, and the role that michael cohen played and facilitated that another trump administration lawyer now claims she was doing this in her individual capacity. not as part of the trump o

the members of the organization will provision of the chemical weapons and the right under article nine they are going to represent us in case you have any suspicions you have to apply to this organization officially and. ask for the consultations with the specific countries we will you have this kind of suspicions and then you you have to give the answer within the ten days only be earlier and if you are not satisfied with the answer then you have a special procedures where the organization itself will be switched to this process so the instead of that the british decided just to talk to us you know in the way of the ultimate thems. and so this is the way this is the way how they are behaving but that you'll just have to clarify for those who don't know both britain and russia are part of that organization yeah that's right so this would be normal protocol under the these circumstances that there's an official request filed in ten days are given this right so this is the official procedure and we. like all the members of that are musicians i subscribe from that but since we're pulling

it is also provided cover for syria at the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons. russians complained recently that we criticize them too much. if the russian government stopped using chemical weapons to assassinate its enemies, and if the russian government stopped helping his syrian allies to use chemical weapons to kill syrian children, and oppression cooperated with the organization for the prohibition of comic weapons by turning over all information regarding this nerve agent, we'll stop talking about them.

the trump organization for business documents. first publicly known time mueller demanded that the documents related to the president's businesses be subpoenaed. let's bring in our experts to assess. is mueller crossing that so-called red line that the president earlier drew, don't go after my business or family's bis business. >> right, look, wolf, at the exact quotes. this is from a "new york times" interview in july. the question was asked, trump did not use the language, red line, but asked, would going into your personal finances excludeing any russia ties, because we know that trump organization has invested in russia and bought things from russia here and there, does that count as a red line? he says, i would think so. now, how do you define what looking into your personal finances excludeing russia means, that's one piece. how does he define red line, we don't know. the other piece is this is something the russian investigation, mueller, the congressional committee looks into, that sticks in donald trump's craw. we know thi

we can slice and dice quickly all through the organization to quickly see what's going on. with that, we have a couple of examples of the dashboard. this one in particular, you can see the numbers of engaged people across the organization, as well as an item-level analysis of all the different survey or engagement drivers. in this example, there's a heat map of sentiment across the organization, and you can see how people are feeling in different groups along those different drivers. >> so jennie just went over the challenges to just deemployipl survey, but that doesn't mean we're just making changes. there are actually more results, taking action on the survey results, so i'm going to get into that a little bit. the first thing is insights. we don't just want to do simple averages, frequencies. we want to do complex statistical analyze, correlations, those things, to really understand what the data means. so for example, quantum workplace does benchmarking with over 8,000 different companies that we're working with, so when we look at our engagement numbers, you know, it's

he subpoenaed the trump organization itself. ssia-related documents related to the trump organization. it's first we've known involving president trump's businesses. the family finances are a touchy subject

other moving parts tonight, the trurch organization subpoenas by robert mueller. the u.s.nces sanctions for interfering in the 2016 election and for hacking into our power plans. when asked when putin is a friend or foe it is up to russia to decide. that and more as the 11th hour gets underway. >>> another busy thursday. good evening once again from our nbc news

no one is doing anything that works for the trump organization that the trump organization does not knowabout. >> that's the question i've asked when i hear about a contract that has a form like contracts have where it had a name for dennis denison. that's supposed to be trump. i don't know what it means to sign somebody else's name, the guy in "mad men," his phony name living his whole life. if you sign somebody else's name to something, why would he be put on the contract if he was trying to keep himself secret? who gave the authorization to michael cohen who put this dennis dennis son's name on the document without donald trump's permission to use his alias? >> yeah, so here's the thing. you are allowed to use an alias. there's a side agreement attached to the settlement agreement that cleary phis who is stormy daniels. her real name. who is david dennison, et cetera. here's the thing. if you want to know the answer to that question, chris who, gave michael cohen authorization, look at the e-mail cornered between whom, michael cohen and donald trump. so that's why the buzzfeed evidenc

that mueller has subpoenaed the trump organization. he ordered them to hand over all documents related to russia and other topics he's investigating. he didn't ask the trump organization for corporation. he went straight to the subpoena. and in a statement the trump organization said it is fully cooperative with the investigation. so as mueller's word is seemingly getting more credible, the president's is not. yesterday mr. trump admitted to making things up while talking with justin trudeau. here is a president speaking yesterday in missouri for senate candidate josh holly. an auto of his remarks were leaks and we've confirmed the authenticity of this ourselves. here is a sampling. >> trudeau came to see me, he's a good guy. justin. he said, no, no we have no trade deficit with you. we have none. donald, please -- i said wrong justin -- i df-- i didn't even know. i didn't know. >> he just said it. why the president would boast about that isn't entirely clear. his defense on twitter, i was right. we do have a trade deficit with canada.

what you have in the trump organization is a virtual identity of the campaign and the profit-making organization the identity, identical people being at the top of both organizations. so it would have been reckless, i think, if mr. mueller failed to take steps like this to make sure that he got all the information he needed to answer the question about possible interference with the campaign that might have involved the campaign. >> jack, i just want to be clear here, just to be clear, mueller could have simply asked for documents but they chose the more aggressive route. that's significant, correct? >> well, yes, it's very significant because when you get a simple document request, your compliance is voluntary. when you get a subpoena, you have to obey it, and you have to obey it completely. not partially. if you leave things out, you are obstructing justice. so there's a severe criminal penalty involved in noncompliance. so, you know, the message here is you better follow the subpoena, you better comply with it, you better cross all the ts and dot all the is and give us what we've asked for, o

documents related to the trump organization's dealings in russia. he first known time robert mueller demanded documents directly related to president trump's businesses and specifically president trump's business in russia. why subpoena the trump organization now rather than just continuing to request stuff from them voluntarily? why do this now at all and in light of this subpoena, why are house democrats now confidently asserting they have document evidence and testimonial evidence that the trump organization was actively negotiating with a sanctioned russian bank. that's a very serious allegation and democrats say they've got the evidence of it. why is that? that's next with somebody who knows. stay with us. goes here. test drive the ztrak z540r at your john deere dealer and learn why it's not how fast you mow, it's how well you mow fast. nothing runs like a deere. save 250 dollars when you test drive and buy a john deere residential z540r ztrak mower. going somewhere? whoooo. here's some advice. tripadvisor now searches more... ...than 200 bookin

and it's old news within the trump organization because according to the "new york times" that subpoena was delivered in, quote, recent weeks, but it is new news to us, to all of us today and the rest of the world, that the "new york times" is reporting that the special prosecutor has subpoenaed the trump organization. the order is the first known instance of the special counsel demanding records directly related to president trump's businesses, bringing the investigation closer to the president. the trump organization released a statement today saying they publically stated last year that they would fully cooperate with the congressional investigations and the special prosecutor's investigation. the statement said this is old news and our assistance and cooperation with the various investigations remains the same today. the "new york times" says the subpoena was delivered in recent weeks. so let's just take a glance back at the single-most panic-filled tweet president trump has issued in recent weeks. it would be this one. witch hunt! he couldn't even come up with a sentence. just the

the trump organization. it is not old news, it is brand-new news that the mueller investigation has subpoenaed the trump organization. so a lot of on fis case today. peter alexander trying to get through some of it as it relates to the trump administration's view on russia. i saw you trying to get some satisfaction out of a question to sarah huckabee-sanders. what were you trying to get at with her. >> we'll play that exchange in a minute. but now robert mueller is subpoenaing the information as it relates to russia and other topics from the trump organize, the first time we know they've been going to the heart and the headquarters of donald trump's own businesses, the trump organization itself, the white house was trying to puff out his chest and say, look at all that we are doing in terms of sanctions against russia. first for the meddling in the election, something that congress had mandated months ago. now today announcing sanctions against 19 individuals and five entities and more broadly the dhs, depart

people would dance to the music provided by the organ in the corner. sound that a completely filled the house. surroundsound before it's time. those pipes are behind tapestries. sound would pour down through the ceiling. picture this room from classical to opera, to the most current dance tune, the charleston. there were a few public events in this room. the funeral rj reynolds, the state enough for art for harry truman. the happiest events in this weddings. there are at least four family weddings that took place in front of this. with a couple of months of the great crash, mary reynolds and nancy reynolds were both married in front of this fireplace. even though over not all do was a country retreat, a place to go and see their farm and golf, and right horses, work always followed rj reynolds. he was the head of a major tobacco company. the reynolds brand of camel cigarettes was the largest brand being sold. when world war i came about, sales skyrocketed even further. the head of the u.s. forces said what we need more than guns is cigarettes for the m

that unions where the vessel, the organization, for the revolution. and that struggle was inevitable, that local will democratic organizations or revolutionary organizations should create loose federations nationally and internationally. so this is a model of change, a model of revolution that is ground up, but it's ground up connected to like organizations, eventually internationally. two significant things happen in pittsburgh in 1883. i think the resolutions that came out of that meeting are part of your reading for this week. but what was behind the change and the kind of pronouncements that came in 1883 had to do with something i mentioned on monday when talking about emma goldman. and that was the arrival of a johan must. a political figure in germany. somebody who was partly establishment becoming a revolutionary. he was jailed for seven years in germany for his radicalism, and he would be jailed in the u.s. three different times, so he had a lot of jail time to think about his ideology. he had to flee germany after publicly suggesting it might

documents related to the trump organization's dealings in russia. is is the first known time robert mueller demanded documents directly related to president trump's businesses and specifically president trump's business in russia. why subpoena the trump organization now rather than just continuing to request stuff from them voluntarily? why do this now at all and in light of this subpoena, why are house democrats now confidently asserting they have document evidence and testimony evidence they were negotiating with a sanctioned russian bank? that's a very serious allegation and democrats have the evidence of it. why is that? that's next with somebody who knows. stay with us. with those we love, but does psoriasis ever get in the way? embrace the chance of 100% clear skin with taltz. for people with moderate to severe psoriasis, up to 90% had a significant improvement of their psoriasis plaques. with taltz, 4 out of 10 even achieved completely clear skin. don't use if you're allergic to taltz. before starting, you should be checked for tuberculosis. t

the other members of the organization will provision of the chemical weapons and the right under article nine they are going to represent us in case you have any suspicions you have to apply to this organization officially and. ask for the consultations with the specific countries we will you have this kind of suspicions and then you have to get the answer within the ten days only be earlier and if you are not satisfied with the answer then you have a special procedures where the organization itself will be switched to this process so the instead of that the british decided just to talk to us you know in the way of the ultimate hymns. and so this is the way this is the way how they are behaving but that you know just to clarify for those who don't know both britain and russia are part of that. and i say sure that's right so this would be normal protocol under the these circumstances that there's an official request filed in ten days or given this right so this is the official procedure and we all like all the members of that are musicians i subscribe from that but since we're blamed the.

did it despite michael cohen's statement come from the trump organization? did it come from someone else? i don't really have a huge interest in knowing what the president did or didn't do years ago with stormy daniels. but i do have an interest in knowing what his exposure to potential blackmail is from stormy daniels or anybody else and who is paying in his effort to make sure, didn't succeed very well, that their relationship or non-relationship, whatever it was, make sure that she did not go public with her allegations. >> ashley, what about the political fallout here, and so far, it has not become a big issue, but is it going to become increasingly difficult for the white house to try to claim that this is not something involving donald trump and a payment that has questionable origins? >> so far, it hasn't become a big political issue for two reasons. the first is that a lot of this, not the money stuff that ruth was addressing but just the president has had affairs or been accused of sexual impropriety was sort of baked in the cake before he became pre

mention the neighbors and the community based organizations, many are here in the audience today.ve been a voice for the project from the beginning. now the city departments. the city departments have been quite amazing led by the port of san francisco, the mayor's office, economic and workforce development, the city attorney office, the planning department, dpw, mta, all unbelievably collaborative in their work with us through this long process. i want to specifically acknowledge port direct elaine forbes for her amazing work. commission president kim brandon. where is kim? so kim brandon -- [applause] -- kim brandon unlike any of the giants players or bruce, did precede this project. i did a fact check, because i don't want fake news, 20 years on the san francisco port commission, looking at the progress and what happened to the port through her two decades of service. thank you, kim. and and finally the city leadership. a heart felt thank you to jane kim who authored the legislation and has taken a personal interest in this project from day one. huge thanks to board president l

he subpoenaed the trump organization itself. he subpoenaed russia-related documents related to the trump organization. it's first we've known involving president trump's businesses. the family finances are a touchy subject for the president. he said sew in a conversation with maggie haberman. >> would that be a breach of what -- >> i would say, yeah, i would say yes. >> it's russia related. but can the personal be business related? that's sometimes blurred. for more we go to maggie haeberman. what can you tell us about this move by special counsel mueller? >> anderson, it's the first time we know of that there's been a subpoena for these kinds of document. that doesn't mean it is the first one. but this includes a number of trump firms that relates to russia. one person pointed out to me there could be all manner of thins th things that show up related to russia. doesn't mean anything nefarious or financial. but what it does tell us is that this probe which the president's legal team had told him would be ending by december or so

the trump organization has to go through documents to comply with the subpoena. then mueller has to figure out what to do willfully. >> any comment from the trump organization so far? >> no. >> michael, schmidt, please stand by if you can. i want to bring in danny cevallos here, msnbc legal analyst. i know you're just reading the article itself, danny, but what do you glean based on this reporting here from the "new york times"? >> one of the things that jumps out at me right away is a subpoena was used instead of just trying to resolve it by asking the trump organization for documents. using a subpoena means that the government means business, in this case the special counsel wants it to be very clear that he wants this to be an unconditional demand for documents. what we may expect is that the trump organization may opposite this subpoena, but it is difficult to quash or limit the scope of federal subpoenas such as this. >> going back to your initial point that you made at the beginning, why would they not just ask for these documents? why issue the subpoena? >

given the weapons they have to present their request to the organization and we're happy to consider this we didn't do the deed this is the international law and of course we're not ready to. to talk you know we will be ultimately the actions taken by the british government became really a crescendo of over a week of the spy saga on raveling where we saw what could have been a potential local incident unravel into a huge international diplomatic standoff. do you know hawkins join me in the studio lead to discuss russia's reaction to britain's punitive measures. i think it will be too long before there is that official response with exact matches from moscow of course from the u.k. government side as we heard there from prime minister to reason why it appears to be an open and shut case there is no other culprits no other possibilities other than the hand of the kremlin being culpable in this attempted murder case now the russian foreign ministry as they initially said a few days back have no knowledge of this they've denied a woman in this tragic incident they've made it clear that th

according to our scientists at porton down there very good we're going to get the a p c w in the or organization of the prohibit of chemical weapons is coming in today to look at the sample that we have of of the nerve agent you also have to consider that surrogates cripple the guy that they attempted to assassinate is somebody who has been identified as a target for liquidation and that i've read in a putin has himself said that traitors i.e. defectors such as mr script how. should be poisoned so it's. a russian only nerve agent this was about do you have any it's solid evidence that poor didn't directly or did it because what you say that is the most direct correlation of russia's lead that ever right. well i'm afraid you know he's in charge of the clattering train as we say in the u.k. somebody has to be responsible somebody has to be accountable and we in the u.k. think that the. evidence points the evidence or culpability points to the russian state and as it did in the case of alexander litvinenko and you remember the trail of polonium lead back very clearly to the russian state and in the

she is also assistant general counsel for the trump organization. but the company claims she facilitated the filing in her individual capacity. much like former trump org lawyer michael cohen who claimed he used his personal funds to facilitate the hush money payment to dans last year. as the lawyer representing stormy daniels revealed that even more women have approached him with potential cases against the president, i want to bring in someone following the developments closely. josh marshall. i've been following your coverage of this. what's the significance of another lawyer popping up with the trump org e-mail address. >> they are sloppy. there are a lot of the lawyers in los angeles. and so why? there's no reason why this had to be the case. this was a trump organization operation to shut her up. but what it really -- what strikes me about it is, when i think about the russia probe, when i think about everything that happened, these are people are not careful. they're very sloppy. >> what do you think the broader sort of significance of the sto

we have also notified the organizations of the prohibition of we have also notified the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons about russia's use of this nerve agent and we are working with the police to enable the opcw to independently verify ourur analysis. mr. speaker, this is not just cannot of attempted murder and salisbury nor just an act against the uk. it is an affront to the prohibition on the use of chemical weapons and it is an affront to the rules-based system on which we and our international partners depend. we will work with our allies and partners to confront such actions wherever they threaten our security, at home and abroad. i commend this statement to the house. >> hear, hear. >> jeremy corbyn. >> thank you, mr. y speaker. i would like to thank the prime minister for advanced sight of her statement and echo absolutelyr her words about the service of our emergency and public services. the attack in salisbury was an appalling act of a violence. nerve agents are abominable it used in any war. it is utterly reckless to use them in a civilian environment.

the early 20th century. in new york, there were 38 of these huge organs. you walk down 5th avenue, you could hear the pulitzer house and the astor house with competing dueling organs. fortunately, this one has been preserved. it is very loud. it runs every day. there are fellows caps on. and a hidden chime. every instrument in the orchestra gets replicated with different types -- pipes in this chamber. ♪ so, renaldo house is one aspect of the history of this larger estate. if you visit today you can discover not only what is inside the house, but you can explore the gardens and the many different ways in which this estate functioned in the early 20th century. >> our cities to her staff recently traveled to winston-salem, north carolina, to learn about its rich history. learn more at c-span.org/cities tour. you are watching american history tv, all weekend, every weekend, on c-span3. >> this week on "the communicators," journalist jimmy sony, co-author of the book "a mind at play, how claude shannon incremented the information age ." >> decades before anyth

the trump organization was everything. the lawyer that wrote the letter, there was nothing outside of it. so, when he's probing into this, he's probing into the dark heart of the trump scandal. >> the dark heart, i love that. michael schmidt, thank you for your reporting. we're grateful to have it. we're grateful to have you. when we come back, a growing outcry of the increasingly belligerent russia. the trump administration finally issues sanctions but is it too little too late? and the deputy director of the fbi a frequent target of the president's mean tweets and a key witness to potential obstruction of justice by the president is fighting for his job this hour. we'll bring you the latest. >>> and that breaking news out of miami, we'll have a live report. stay with us. you know what's awesome? gig-speed internet. you know what's not awesome? when only certain people can get it. let's fix that. let's give this guy gig- really? and these kids, and these guys, him, ah. oh hello. that lady, these houses! yes, yes and yes. a

assistant general counsel at the trump organization. remember she spoke on behalf of candidate trump during the 2016 election. this would make her the second employee at the trump organization who now has a direct involvement in the stormy daniels related legal matters. jill martin put out a statement and i also talked to her on the phone yesterday. she insists she did this in her private capacity and with the exception of herself, the trump organization is not involved in stormy daniels' related matters. it raises questions about michael cohen's previous statements that he acted entirely on his own. two other things to quickly mention, first of all, stormy daniels's lawyer michael avenatti is saying there are other women who might be considering taking legal action against president trump. we'll try to find out what he is talking about. we have a new friend of stormy daniels speaking out. he says during 2006 and 2007, the time period when stormy daniels had this alleged affair with trump, he listened in on private phone calls that stor