item, which is in fact, the juliet ellis and >> and you have the settlement gret before you and the stipulation document and a couple of notes about this, this is a joint settlement and so there were three negotiating parties and the respondent and the two enforcement agency and because the fppc has heard and accepted the settlement agreement in a public session, we are in an unusual situation, because our regulations require that this is things be debated in closed session and however since it has been debated publicly, the city attorney has advised us to do the same. and so the staff and the city attorney will represent any questions that you have about the document in the settlement. and anything that is in this department, and if we go. off of the document, and into some details about the investigation, we may have to pull back from there. the bottom line in the settlement is that altogether there are several findings of violation of state and local law. for the purposes of simplification they have settled with the respondent for $3500 for a violation of section 8986 of the government code

aamounted to $250,000 that she would have been a beneficiary of that and i wind up agreeing with the stipulation and i have no problem with it and obviously underlying it, our staff must have done a fine job of working on it with the fppc. and in bringing about this stimulation. but, why is it that something like this comes to us, and without telling the public and i think that the education of the public, and on this, a high level public utilities officials lobbying her own agency for $200,000 for lobbying for a company that she works for and that is fairly significant in terms of conflict of interest and we should be delving into it and the staff must have to come up with this and we should be talking about it and discussing it more and analyzing it and we should be telling the members of the public about it, and educating the public about it, and if nothing else, just to blow our own horn, i mean that we have people who are coming here, and saying, that, the three meetings that i have been at saying and that you guys don't do your job and this is an indication to me that the staff did do thei

this is before us, right now, for a vote, whether we will vote up or down, the stipulation, and that enjoining with the fppc,; is that correct?? >> right, the fppc has approved their portion of the settlement and i think that what is before us now is whether the commission wants to approve the violations of local law, that were admitted to the stipulation. >> i plan on voting for it, what if we all turned it down tonight, what would happen then? >> i can answer that. >> okay. >> the fppc would likely sever their part out and, renegotiate that part with the respondent and move on without us. and then we would have to renegotiate with the respondent for our own settlement. and then, if the respondent will not come to terms with us, then we end up going to a hearing on the merits, which is a finding of probable cause and a public hearing on the merits. >> thank you, that is, that is quite helpful. >> and so, in regard to our deliberations of this matter, if we were to decide determining whether or not we are going to enter into the stipulation in order to do that we have to get more info

doctrine of the constitution and the decision to organize the presidential elections within the timeframe stipulated by the constitution i believe that we will be we will be moving towards the normal kind of regime and government and presidency so. you will certainly continue to perform its role as the as any other would do to protect the sovereignty of the country as for the next elections the stated we are. waiting for the decision of martial. sisi to leave the army to resign and to run for elections. as he is now is not going to run as commander in chief are you guys going to run as a former officer in the army and will you run in accordance with the preconditions of stipulated in because the gluten so we're not talking about the governing we are talking about democracy but while we're also talking about. the army intervening in the political affairs and let me ask you a hypothetical question what if the next elections bring to power you know some political force that they army doesn't like will they have to intervene again isn't a question that is it will be controversial that is either to be cl

of five ayes and two absent, maufas and wynns give the authority of the district to pay up to the stipulate you lated amount in the matter of sd verses san francisco unified school district, case n2014010612, the board of education, by a vote of 5 ayes and two absent, maufas, wynns, give the authority of the district to pay up to stipulated amount. and the other informational items and posted on the agenda and informational personnel transactions and this meeting is adjourned. thank you. >> hello, i am with the recreation and parks department. we are featuring the romantic park location in your backyard. this is your chance to find your heart in santa and cisco with someone special. -- san francisco with someone special. our first look out is here at buena vista park, a favorite with couples and dog walkers. both have a significant force. a refreshing retreat from urban life. the romantic past that meander up and down the park under pines and eucalyptus. hang out in this environment and you might see butterflies it, fennel, and then the lines. -- dandelions. is ada accessible. public transi

of five ayes and two absent, maufas and wynns give the authority of the district to pay up to the stipulate you lated amount in the matter of sd verses san francisco unified school district, case n2014010612, the board of education, by a vote of 5 ayes and two absent, maufas, wynns, give the authority of the district to pay up to stipulated amount. and the other informational items and posted on the agenda and informational personnel transactions and this meeting is adjourned. thank you.

>> commissioner hyland the last time i'm aware of a major project building was approved with the stipulation that it certain parts of it be take care of it was the yes, ma'am porm and that ended up costing the project several millions of dollars. >> that was retroactive. >> it took a lawsuit. is there that any chance? >> we have a motion on the floor if we could reread or rope the friendly amendments please. >> , of course, commissioners there's a motion and second on the floor that was amended for the sponsor to work closely with the family and work sneflly with the fountain to have a sensitive plan for the movement and it's restorati restoration. submitted >> oh, absolutely to the department. >> shall i call the question? >> you mean the roll. >> yes. >> on that motion then commissioners commissioner hyland. ass >> as much as i like the construction. >> commissioner matsuda. i'm going to say yes, but i have a concern about the legislation >> commissioner pearlman. >> i've been fretting over this for days and days i'll vote yes. >> commissioner wolfram and president hasz. so moved, commissi

of five ayes and two absent, maufas and wynns give the authority of the district to pay up to the stipulate you lated amount in the matter of sd verses san francisco unified school district, case n2014010612, the board of education, by a vote of 5 ayes and two absent, maufas, wynns, give the authority of the district to pay up to stipulated amount. and the other informational items and posted on the agenda and informational personnel transactions and this meeting is adjourned. thank you. >> good afternoon, everybody let me please call this meeting of the san francisco public utilities commission at the 1:40 p.m. sfgovtv requires you to speak into the microphone otherwise the public can't hear our discussion. call roll >> commissioner president courtney. commissioner moran. commissioner torres. conditioning and commissioner vietor are on their way a you tell me 3 is the approval of the minutes from february 11, 2014. commissioners >> move to accept. >> any public comment on the minutes of february 11, 2014, seeing none, public comment is closed. i'll call for a vote all all in favor, say i.

of five ayes and two absent, maufas and wynns give the authority of the district to pay up to the stipulate you lated amount in the matter of sd verses san francisco unified school district, case n2014010612, the board of education, by a vote of 5 ayes and two absent, maufas, wynns, give the authority of the district to pay up to stipulated amount. and the other informational items and posted on the agenda and informational personnel transactions and this meeting is adjourned. thank you. good morning, everyok you for being with you us for this special melting the meeting will come to order this is the san francisco transportation authority finance committee. i'm supervisor cowen the chair and to my left is supervisor chiu and to my right is scott wiener and mark farrell and before we get started thank you sftv thank you gentlemen staff. madam clerk >> no unanimously could you call items it through 4. >> those are the consent calendar and those will be acted upon by a single vote and any content item can be removed. >> anyone want to serve any items. seeing none, would any members of the pub

of five ayes and two absent, maufas and wynns give the authority of the district to pay up to the stipulate you lated amount in the matter of sd verses san francisco unified school district, case n2014010612, the board of education, by a vote of 5 ayes and two absent, maufas, wynns, give the authority of the district to pay up to stipulated amount. and the other informational items and posted on the agenda and informational personnel transactions and this meeting is adjourned. thank yo >> good afternoon, everybody i'm loped brodie i'm the supervisor for 5th district i'm excited because i believe this is the model for how affordable housing should be done in san francisco when we build housing to other locations to develop all below rate i want to thank by thanking the developer brian and those hopes are going to be absolutely amazing. i'm here to express my commitment to make sure that san francisco is doing everything this can to continue our work on affordable housing. we talk about when we do that wrong well, this is the case we doing to right and pushing more affordable housing in so fa

. >> i have a difficult time understanding the stipulation that that's for non-conforming use it was built with the inspections in plays. >> it was developed at the time through the bonus process it explodes the fdr their building it is smaller thereof it wouldn't imply with the current code. >> that's the reason one of the criteria is a reduction in the floor area so this makes it more in conformity with the current code. >> we've done that for other legal number one conforming structures. >> commissioners there is a motion and a second on the floor to approve the requester for determination of inclines with conditions to include that ada accessibility be discussed with the mayor's office of sdaktd. commissioner borden. commissioner hillis. commissioner moore. i said i. commissioner sugaya. commissioner wu. president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes with commissioner sugaya voting against. the scoping administrator what say you >> you move to close this hearing. >> why do we >> commissioners, we left off on your regular calendar item 13 for case no. 2013.1331c for 435

discussion is going to be that we recommend to the puc, in light of her admissions, contained in the stipulation, that she did indeed commit these violations of influencing a government decision in which the official has a financial interest, that we recommend to the puc that she be terminated. >> is that something that we need to vote on? >> you can't, this is a discussion item only, that is for the in-coming chair to take under advisement when he and i plan the next month's agenda. >> thanks. >> dually noted commissioner keane. >> anyone else? >> and any public comment on matters appearing before the commission, or not appearing on the agenda? >> actually, you have to have public comment for items for future meetings. >> okay. >> comments on the matter for future comment? >> again, ray hartz, director of san francisco open government, you know what i would like to say on future ago agenda that you would actively solicit impute from the citizens from san francisco about what they would expect you to be doing and one of the things that you don't see on tv is that i and one other person are the o

there are three ayes if favor. >> and we have the motion passes. >> we approve the stipulation and the decision along with the fppc. and we will communicate this action appropriately. >> okay. so, now we come to the budget. always a favorite topic of the commission. >> okay. >> and mr. st. croix, where are we with the budget? >> you have a blessed evening. >> you too. >> so, for years particularly because the city financially was doing poorly, as was the statement, contrary, the directions from the mayor's budget office has always been all departments to find a certain percentage of cuts in the budget proposals. and the ethics commission, is a little bit unique in that we are an independent agency from the rest of the city, and we don't quite function in the same structure. and so, although we are politely acknowledged the budget instructions and we usually have declined to follow them in just submit a static budget of the same budget that we had the prior year. last year the commission decided that things have improved sufficiently enough that we should ask for a little bit more becau

not only for what we did here, but a lot of people don't know that the stipulations that we set in ourre used throughout the countries to integrate departments in the south and north for men and women, gay and lesbian. so, but the 1 person that i would see again and again, meetings after meetings, after meetings, nights, weekends, writing proposals, some proposals were funded and even before the suit he was involved and some gradualism efforts to try to change the department and i was there and i saw it. so, if 1 person i think that was the glue that pulled us altogether and i'm not exaggerating was troy dangerfield. so this honor is very merited and i wanted for you to be able to say this. we were all there and we saw what it too k to bring it alltogether. so troy and rodney, joe williams, mariam jackson, these were my mentors, these were the people that led me to do what i was to do. so i wanted to say this because you know troy, among my mentors, you are most esteemed and if over the years i have acquired the reputation of being a troublemaker or even worse than that, you are respon

this is my fourth time here and i also agree with all of the stipulations that you also so graciously and correctly passed unanimously and i don't understand why the opposition, the developers keep coming back and back and back. and also i'm very much in favor of having the construction down. i performed at the marsh. i know that i can't imagine performing with construction noises in the background and how very vital and important it is to let people know exactly whenever they are going to be living next to an active wonderful marvelous theatre. thank you. >> good evening, my name is clarence isaac. i have lived in san francisco for 30 years now. i have attended the marsh since it's been in san francisco. to me it's an extraordinarily great place. to me it was astonishing and belittle i -- brilliant on your part to come up with what is best for the community. the developer i'm sure has a lot of money in this and he has a vested interest. at the same tone he needs to understand the environment he's moving into and the neighborhood he's moving into and needs to accept the decision you m

state of florida, the defendant and his attorney have hereby stipulated to the following.24g9 and 25th, 2012 by dr. stacy a simons bearing the medical examiner's case number of 12-1982, is that of jordan davis. >> ma'am, again, i'll ask you, is your medical examiner number underneath mr. davis' chin in this photo for purposes of documentation? >> yes, it is. >> this photo was 138 for the record. before conducting the autopsy, was jordan davis measured for height? >> yes, he was. >> what height was roared for him, 5 feet, 11 inches. >> was he weighed? >> yes, he was. >> was he weighed with clothing or without? >> was weighed in what we call the as-is state, in the body bag with some sheets and his clothing. >> as he had come to you from the hospital? >> exactly. >> what was his weight with the clothing and the other items that were on the tray? >> 145 pounds. >> would you expect based on your experience that jordan davis weighed less than 145 pounds considering the amount of clothing and sheets? >> yes, i would. >> where was the autopsy conducted? >> at 2100 jefferson stree

chill in the canteen stipulate that plane. i still keep trying and trying to stop attacks yet and the kids skate at uni and auntie now. about two thousand eight hundred athletes will compete in the one hundred effects taking security forces fought the hijacking plot giving custody and present it to make a bomb blast in an attempt to force attack is trying to dissect of the russian city of sochi. as the wind to olympics but getting underway. take this commercial airliner flying from the ukrainian city of qom cost to stumble on friday issued a sick note indicating that her jacket and take each of the ot scramble to find detective for supply and demand. istanbul is the son said he had gone to court just what officials say at present it claimed that once upon one board and trying to type that the plane to sochi koalas are demanding police stormed the plane and took a forty five village ukrainian man into custody and no record of our passengers the need to be sampled on from there to say not the mythical proportions them and no expl