actually is rarely do is in the united states, are speaking of it as a holocaust. and one of the very important elements, by the way, in this shifting narrative that we're seeing across the world is the fact that many of the key opponents of this genocide and of this really regime are young cubes, especially in the united states. their activism is extraordinary. and they are thing eventually real like ro and then in this struggle for justice. so i think what this is, randy regime is d, legitimizing itself in the eyes of the international community by the by not only do you mean the palestinian people and presenting them as an inferior themselves human. but also by explicitly speaking about allison and just being sub german and speaking about the intention to carry out genocide and it is a very significant that the country that went out and came out a complaint to the international community and uh, went to the i see that it was actually south africa that the country that was also an apartheid regime where a minority ruled over a majority that was presented as a sub

this is obvious to the united states need this. what for thousands of miles away from your national territory, don't you have anything better to do? you have issues on the border issues with migration issues, with the national debt. more than $33.00 trillion dollars. you have nothing better to do so you should fight in ukraine. wouldn't it be better to negotiate with russia? make an agreement already understanding the situation that is developing today. realizing that russia will fight for its interest to the end and realizing this actually returned to common sense, start respecting our country and its interests and look for certain solutions. it seems to me that this is much smarter and more rational, who blow up north stream. you for sure. i was busy that need it and you have to have it. i just uploaded or, uh, it takes, you know, what you personally may have an alibi, but it's the c. i a has no such alibi. you do have evidence that nato are to see. i didn't mention, you know, i won't get into details, but people always say in suc

we must not forget how great the resources of the united states are. the national guard, the army, that is, there are about a million soldiers. if the united states enters this war, we understand that the conflict will take on a completely different character, and russia will suffer irreparable losses. if this conflict continues, is it possible to repeat the situation with the second world war, when there was this block, hitler's, big... block from italy, germany, japan, can russia in this situation enlist the support of north korea, china, iran, syria and other countries that can enter into a conditional putin's bloc, which will fight with the western bloc. extremely good. question, because i believe that this putin block, as you called it, i believe that it already exists, and what we are talking about now is actually the support from other countries, even countries like india, brazil, which, saudi arabia, which in fact, in one way or another, they tend to gravitate towards the putin bloc rather than the western bloc, and so i want to say, of course,

we're now we want to cooperate the united states at the way. you're still yeah. to be dominance as an agenda. i mean if we look at it objectively, if i also have to have some business planned to it. if you want to add shipments unit to calculate the names of the goals and to make sure that you know your, your balance to these is an order from what you're saying. and from what you've been writing, it appears that the united states just claims dominance. but it doesn't do any sort of homework to ensure that it has the resources, the capacity is this strategy, the tactics to ensure and without it, i don't understand how this people imagine the dominance will stay with them. i mean, it's like it's, it's not just wishful thinking of seem to be a, you know, they say, well, perhaps. yeah, but yeah, so, and so the answer is, uh, the answer is 1st, they live in the past. i because the us was relatively more powerful and 1992 by the clearly lives in the past. you how we use it, use a man of the past that a lot of my former colleagues and harvard because now i'm at columbia

when i was young and i was in the united states as a, as a child. you could see that that sense of exceptionalism existed throughout society. and when we moved back to you, ron, after the revolution, as i did increasingly see those red contradiction between what americans were saying to themselves and what was happening outside of the united states. although i was in a politically aware family, even when we were in the united states. so i was a child. but i think that moment probably was when i, i saw the united states using chemical weapons or the west using chemical weapons extensively through us adopt was saying when there was a decision made by the west to give set the same the technology to make mustard gas and nerve agents to kill many thousands of innocent people, but also many thousands of bands. i went to the city of culture very soon after the gas attack. and i think maybe 6000 people were killed. i have the exact number as i've never come out. but um, there was no condemnation in the west during that period during that, those years of war

the united states is becoming a leader in channeling united states' investments to pakistan. in the last fiscal year, our u.s.-based diaspora investments are in fact remittances, $3 billion, same as in the previous year. to answer your question as to what are the most promising sex -- the most promising sectors, i would start with the tech sector. a small 10 belinda -- $10 million venture capital funding has soared to $4 billion. e-commerce earned $6 billion last year. tech startups covering for an tech, -- fintech, real estate, and transportation are transforming pakistan's economic landscape. this is just the beginning. new technologies, ai, robotics, block chain, synthetic biology, you name it, are being taught in pakistani colleges and universities and being assimilated by industry. venture capital firms from the united states, europe, the gulf, china, and southeast asia are financing these startups because they see pakistan as the next digital hub. which even now has 30,000 i.t. firms and 75,000 i.t. graduates joining the workforce every year. we are training an additiona

this is obvious to the united states need this. what for thousands of miles away from your national territory. so you don't, you have anything better to do? you have issues on the border issues with migration issues, with the national debt. more than $33.00 trillion dollars. you have nothing better to do. so you should fight in ukraine. wouldn't it be better to negotiate with russia? make an agreement already understanding the situation that is developing today. realizing that russia will fight for its interest to the end and realizing this actually return to common sense, start respecting our country and its interests and look for certain solutions. it seems to me that this is much smarter and more rational, who blow up north stream. you for sure. i was busy that made it and you have to have uh, i did not pull up your last name. uh it takes you to know what you personally may have an alibi, but with the c i a has no such alibi. did you have evidence that nato, or did it matter? you know, i won't get into the details, but people alw

states shah was acting as puppet in west asia for the united states during the vietnam war, the unitedjets that were sold to iran to attack vietnamese and we have passage in the memories of mother that one day shah went to his mother and was quite upset and the mother asked the shah, why are you upset? and the answer was that the americans have taken these fighter jets from iran without even notifying me, meaning the show, so the relationship between the shah and nixon kissenger those years... actually led to the revolution, because what wanted from nexon, after giving all these services to nixon was to leave the internal affairs of oppressing the people of iran to the shah, so cia had huge office in tehran, iran was actually the hub of cia operations in the middle east, and the cia didn't realize... 'there is going to be a revolution until it was too late and the reason for that was that it was an agreement between the shaw and the nexon administration to leave iran alone in terms of how shah was running the country in terms of oppressing the the revolution came in 1979 in such a envi

when is the united states going to do with the united states pledged to do. defend democracy andy tate -- and dictatorship. >> europe still needs to do more. as of last summer only 11 of the nato allies, that still needs to be done and applaud what germany is doing to get there hopefully this year. there are so many european allies. with regards to the united states, we are democracies. it takes time to get there. so for example the europeans haven't gotten to 2% yet. it takes time to bring democracies along. we will get there with regards to making adjustments. there may be different paths to get there. i'm reminded of winston churchill's quote americans will do the right thing after exhausting all other possibilities. i do think we will get there, it's just democracies take time to process. >> is there enough time for the democratic process. >> hearing about the two europeans here. what senator angus king told me that the united states is 15th in terms of defense spending. and other european countries are spending more frankly. giving all to the 2%. that's s

the united states has let the genie out of the bottle.d and expressed its indignation, what was said, the un charter and international law are outdated, now everyone refers to international law. but then they started saying that everything was outdated , everything needed to be changed, something really needed to be changed, because the balance of power had changed, that’s true, but not in that way, but nevertheless, yes, by the way, they immediately started throwing mud at yeltsen, pointing out to the fact that he is an alcoholic, he doesn’t understand anything, he doesn’t understand anything, he understood everything, he understood everything, i assure you, that means, well, okay, i became president in 2000, i think, okay, all this yugoslav issue has passed, but we have to try.. .but it didn’t end there, well no, no, okay, okay, let's be, what do you think, why, what are the motives for this? i feel that you feel bitter about this, i understand, but why do you think the west rejected you so much then, where did this hostility come from,

given the united states own history of religious liberties, how did the people in the united states reactto what was going on in guam? well, they may not have known very much what was going on in guam, because it's so far away. but the guam indians were really organizing amongst themselves for this the right for self-government. they there was the petition that i mentioned from 1901, that was one of a petitions that we know of. and guam remained under naval rule. that's military rule until 1950. this is probably something that people don't know about. guam after 1950. the us president appointed a governor to be the representative governor of guam and guam indians were still unsatisfied. and of course, because they wanted again the right to their own cratic elections. so they elected their first governor in 1970. and since then, guam has been represented to the united states as an unincorporated territory through through the governor that guam indian residents elect. so it became a territory in 1898 and remains a territory today. it does. so we've come to the philippines, which is where th

i, in my opinion, that are in power in the united states. they spent 7 trillion dollars in afghanistan in a rock, ukraine, syria, libya. what have we gotten for nothing? let me ask you about the people because uh, the united states, private cellphone being a democracy in the model one. and as you wrote, all those failed war, since 2000 have caused the american people around 5 trillion dollars, indirect outlays, or around $4.00 to $1000.00 per household. there are many indirect expenses as well, like the supports for the veterans, the crime statistics, you know, the health care crisis, prescription drugs, crisis, etc. what allows the american society a to be so resilient and to take a song, many expenses without clear returns and without much of a policy change. because i have to tell you that, i think in russia it will not pass the russians would not have been so lived in. well, it's interesting, you know, 1st america, it's an extremely rich countries. it really is a rich country average of uh, average income, $70000.00 per person. so a lot o

mexico has surpassed china to become the united states' largest trading partner. at's incredibly important and very powerful going forward. we also saw in the last two years the creation in a bipartisan way of a dfc. they've got an important role to play along with usaid and our other development organizations. we also can't overstate the role of the vice president, first vice president bide when he worked under president obama and now vice president harris, as they have gone and tried to private investment in the northern triangle countries of central america, for example. those are all important things that are bearing fruit but also, i think, in the coming years will be yard linessingly important. so give -- increasingly important. so give the countries a greater stake in their relationships with the united states of america. and also that's on the economic side. we have to build up democracies on the government and political side. what china is selling is the different form of government. and really we're almost appealing -- of course we're appealing to last la

that the main responsible for these for this genocide is the zionist regime in tel aviv backed by the united states and western forces who have been providing military support, political support, financial support to israel to conduct its crimes against the palestinian people for the past 75 years and particularly for the past four months, where israel have been placing the entire palestini people in ghazza under siege for the past 17 years in literally a prison and for the past four months they have been bombing palestinians with thousands and tens of thousands of explosives and death from air and sea and land and under the world eyes. the united nation is unanimously unanimously have called for seizfire and the united states singlehanded. with their follower puppets like the uk have been blocking any efforts to reach you know cease fire basically to reach you a stop to this slaughter carried a daily basis 24 hour seven days a week for the pat since october eight this is the problem problem is the united states and uk uh wants to flux its missiles on the region and not just on ghazza okay a

nations security council, to the united nations general assembly to the united international criminal court. being put on notice that the rest of the world is is uh watching and is is clearly declaring that if the united states gives money and weapons to israel to unleash more murder against the palestinians, it will be aiding abetting genocide, and it will suffer all of the legal, economic, political, social, cultural and military consequences of that action, the the the genocide that israel is doing, is an offense to all of humanity and god himself, and it's quite horrifying that my own congress in the united states has sunk to such a monstrous level of idiocy and blindness that they would would call evil good and good evil, but i think that's the way to combat it is from an international coalition point of view as well as providing international human. aid through a coalition, don't wait for unra, fill the vacuum that unra is missing and deliver humanitarian aid immediately, otherwise the israelis their strategy is to turn gaza into hell on earth so so that six months from now you

the interlocutor for the choice of the russian president was the most popular in the united states, at same time persecuted at home, once a tv presenter, and after leaving fox news, an independent journalist, tucker carlson. are we on a talk show or are we having a serious conversation? this is wonderful. quote: thank you, we are having a serious conversation. the conversation in the kremlin lasted 2 hours and 7 minutes, and in my opinion it was american-centric in the sense that it was aimed primarily at an american audience. this was important because it was america is in charge of all these hostile actions against russia, which we have seen since the times of the ussr, after the ussr, right up to the present day. america is sharpening against. the nato national bloc beat up a coalition of more than fifty states with the goal of inflicting a strategic defeat on russia. it is in america that leading politicians and mainstream media deliberately distort the essence of what is happening to the point of oversimplification. they are bad, we are good. this happens every day on american tel

states, i will be talking to oleksandr motsyk, the ambassador of ukraine to the united states. from 5, good health, mr. oleksandr, thank you for finding time for us, good evening, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, and i have a purely american question for you first, then a ukrainian-american one, but an american one questions, politics was written by such a publication that biden in private conversations, well, not very flattering to trump, and somehow it's like how the news sounded, and i'm sitting to... i think someone doesn't know about this, that in private conversations, both presidents, and prime ministers , and ministers, and deputies about their political opponents say whatever they want, that's what they say, i don't think trump talks very well about biden, biden about trump and so on and so forth, everyone doesn't like their political opponents, but it seems like that that the world is making noise for the second day. oh, look, he's his, he's his somehow, no that's what i called it, well, yes, well, it's normal, that's always the case, what do you say, eh, well, i'll s

does the united states need this? this dealt a blow to the german economy, why then are the germans silent, this confuses me, why the germans did not say anything about this question? well, this also surprises me, it also surprises me, but today’s german leadership is not, is not guided by national interests, but is guided by. interests of the collective west, otherwise it is difficult to explain the logic of their actions or inaction, because it’s not just about nord stream 2 , which blew up, nord stream 1, which blew up, nord stream 2 was damaged, but one pipe is alive, healthy, and can be supplied gas to europe, but germany is not opening it, we are ready, please, there is another route through poland and europe. the united states in terms of volume of financial assistance to ukraine is germany. through the territories of ukraine two gas routes pass. they took one route and simply closed it. will be stable, sustainable and predictable, and as long as the head is divided into two parts, this is a disease, this is a s

it was the united states largest. i want to come back on on that as well. again, i think it's important to keep in mind that we did leave when the rockies asked us to leave. okay, we were willing to leave some folks there. but biology said no. so we left completely. we were asked to come back by the iraqi government and the other thing i think it's important to keep in mind the rocky government publicly will say things to a piece of land, but privately they'll tell us no, we really still want you to, to stay. so i think it's important to keep that in mind. and basically we ended up in syria to fight isis, which was going after the rocky curves. that's why we were, we're all up there. so this has been all roll. and prior to the attack, the october 7th attacks, there was no conflict going on. there were no shell waiting or anything like that. it was october 7th when a ray and i think gave the green light to a lot of what they call the cards for people in iraq to attack americans in iraq and syria. so i think this out is the key thing, but norris, i mean, how t

while the united states is working to revive isis terrorist activity . the syrian era republic expresses its deep concern over the state of paralysis of un security council. as the us henders its ability to assume its responsibilities in halting such dangerous violations. there are no, says, has made it yet another world, one in the middle east, by unleashing a wave of air strikes against what it called the targets and the positions of the wrong back to miller shows. india wrong, and syria, of course, or the west has justified it's the air strikes in those countries by saying that these tribes actually are a retaliation for all the sundays. um air of drones strikes by the rocky as long because as the school that killed 3 american troops on the georgia indian syrian border, but this as well different countries. and they have different observers have bought condemned the attacks by the united states thing. for example, serious said that the attacks are aimed at reinvigorating the prices their group and syria, as the air strikes targeted exactly the areas wh

"this is the problem, problem is the united states and the uk uh wants to flux its missils on the region and not just on ghazza, and to come back with their military colonization of of the region. you had few weeks back at this point, tony gosling where you had many us officials including including the national security advisor, including the uh um the head of the military lloyd austin who have said that we're going to transition into this uh..." low intensity phase uh, since then you've had the icj ruling which came out and said, you know, you guys, uh, israel, uh, you need to uh prevent any type of genocidal um deaths to happen based on the evidence that was presented by many lawyers, but yet from that point as an example uh, there has been on and off about 200 uh palestinians who have been killed um a a 24-hour basis and and when you take a look at not only that fact but the us military support is quite shocking to see that uh and this is back in december of 25 of 2023 that israel has received 230 planes from the us with 20 ships loaded with us arms, that's a lot, it looks like it sou

is you guessed it, our country, the united states. in fact, this morning is from the us based thing. tech. it's called, pacific rim. could look them up. they're telling countries interested in joining the b r i not to like don't because it will result they say in the chinese having access and control over their communications, their surveillance, their media, and at the book they're going to spy on them. that's not all effective. that's not scary enough. there's this. now, remember the image of the presidents she and putting together. let's go back to that. the us media is tv networks and newspapers have been pouncing and then use that as a bludgeoning tool against the b r i. even the wall street journal, good newspaper chimed in with this very, very, very critical report. it's not a ringing endorsement, right? nor was one expected. but something happened on the way to the this year's b r i summit, that suddenly shifted the world's focus elsewhere. it also puts she in a very difficult role of playing both summit host and participate in

the united states actually annexed from mexico. een a secession movement in the state, separation from washington. today there are about a million people there. conditions with the federal authorities again fueled separatist sentiments; a little over a month ago, residents collected 139 signatures in favor of holding, in parallel with the presidential elections, november to hold a referendum on secession from the united states. the growth of autonomy sentiment in texas has been a feature of the last 7-8 years. this is a trait that reflects the overall deterioration of the system. government administration of the united states, imposing on an actually very conservative state, a state stuffed with small arms, some liberal-left-liberal views that contradict it, and this, by the way, reflects the general policy of the authorities in recent years to strengthen the federal vertical of power in the united states. between 1836 until... 1846 there was an independent republic of texas, then the state united the territories of the current stat

the united states, the state. members of the congress. i. the high privilege and the distinct honor of presenting to you the president of the united states. mr. mr.. members of the 96th congress, fellow citizens citizens. this last few months has not been an easy time for. any of us, as we meet tonight it, has never been more clear that the state our union depends on the of the world. and tonight, as throughout our generation freedom and peace in the world depend on the state of, our union, the 1980s have been born into a more so strife and change. this is a time challenge to our interest and our values and it's time to test our wisdom and our skills. at this time in iran. 50 americans are still held captive innocent victims of terrorism and anarchy anarchy. also, at this moment, massive soviet troops are attempting to subjugate the fiercely independent and deeply religious people of afghanistan. these acts one off international terrorism and one off military aggression, present serious challenge to the united states of america and indeed to

hello, there is a serious domestic political crisis in the united states. s governor sent biden where further away and the residents supported him. what caused the american uprising, why is the specter of civil war looming in the states, is everything that serious? the situation that has developed is very typical not only for washington, mass riots in europe and... against the white house overseas are caused by one very simple reason: when the people speak, the authorities get too carried away and do not listen point-blank, we will prove this, as always, only with facts , it’s up to you to draw your own conclusions! texas is one of the main circulatory systems for the usa, the state accounts for half oil production, a quarter of gas in the entire country. if austin, the capital, declares independence, it will immediately become the ninth economy in the world. the state's economy exceeds $2 trillion and can give odds to entire countries. to understand, this is more than in italy and canada. texas offers businesses cheap energy. there is no. corporate income t

states the united states the seed of a republican government in the world, the united states in 1817, when monroe became president, the only republic in the western world. so he decided to use his annual message to congress which was the equivalent today we refer to it as the state the union address, but it was the major policy statement issued by the government each and everybody paid a lot of attention to it. so monroe knew that if he said something in this in his message that it would receive a lot of attention and people would pay attention to it. a lot of the message was was standard information given to congress of issues that congress would be dealing with in the upcoming session, that the state of the army, state of the navy improvements, the the the national budget, these sorts of things. but part of the way through he was talking. foreign relations and he brought up the subject of a negotiation with russia, referring to russian interests in expanding its territory in the in what is now the pacific northwest east. and in talking about this and about the upcoming negotiations

the united states has to focus more on east asia. that is going to be the future of american foreign policy for the next 40 years, and europe has to wake up to that fact. now, let me just throw a couple of facts out there. number one, the problem in ukraine from the perspective of the united states of america, and i represent, i believe, the majority of american public opinion, even though i don't represent the majority of opinion of senators who come to munich, is that there's no clear endpoint, and fundamentally the limiting factors for american support of ukraine, it's not money, it's munitions. america, and this is true, by the way, of europe too, we don't make enough munitions to support a war in eastern europe, a war in the middle east, and potentially a contingency in east asia. so the united states is fundamentally limited. now, let me just throw very specific details. the pac-3, which is a patriot interceptor, ukraine uses in a month what the united states makes in a year. the patriot missile system is on a five year back ord

economic value, the units like the chloralkali units or the units that work on the salt chain are working alongside these, and there is also a pilot project alongside the other. i hope one of these is being implemented. to conclude, you know why i am asking this question, mr. dosti , maybe the dear viewers who are watching us in the special news talk show will have this question in the corner of their minds that right now , for the same number of people in the southern regions of the country, we are facing the problem of water supply. if this population, which is for example in different areas of stanrab or minab or other places where the facilities are available, is to be transferred to another place, then worry about it. there are accesses, the government plan, the program that i mentioned in the future has short, medium and long term, it can be very important and hopeful for the people . 42% of the capacity of desalination plants in the province has increased, this is a very significant number. from the beginning of the government, you can see another thing that has been done. there is

subsequently his policy was supported and already in 1830 the number of protective measures in the united exceeded any protectionist measures in europe. this indicated that they did everything to prevent foreigners from entering their market. products, the second main ideologist of such a policy is, of course, the republican, albert beverridge, which on september 16, 1898 publishes a famous treatise called the march of the flag, but in the english version it is the march of the flag, and in fact it not only laid the foundations of the foreign economy of the united states of america , but foreign policy, and if... moving away from deep ideological terms, the essence his conclusion in this treatise is that he said the following: america experienced the strongest financial and economic... crisis of the seventies of the 19th century in 1872-7, which is why steam propulsion was introduced for production goods, manual labor was replaced by steam engines, including electricity, electricity replaces certain types of activities in enterprises, and the number of goods becomes huge, but there is no

it was the united states wants to be the world power. and if you're another big country like china or like russia, as the united states does not want you there in that way, and that is really the deeper motivation. i'm sorry to say that's what president booting says the interview in essence, which is that 1991 didn't change all that much because uh, russia said okay we're, we're not, we're a democracy. we're now we want to cooperate the united states that the way you are still. yeah. to be dominance as an agenda. i mean, if we look at it objectively, if i also have to have some business planned to it, if you want to share with, you need to calculate the names of the goals and to make sure that you know your, your balance to these is an order from what you're saying and from what you've been writing, it appears that the united states just claims dominance, but it doesn't do any sort of homework to ensure that it has the resources, the capacity, is this, try to do the tactics to ensure and without it, i don't understand how this people ima

the united kingdom shares these views. the parties agreed framework provides a further basis for declining to answer the request. that framework envisages the negotiation. a visuals withdrawal, not a court decision requiring it. in response to this submission, 3 main points are being raised by all the participants. first to the said, the negotiation process has been store for some time. this does not negate the validity of the security council framework, nor does it change the reality. that integrated solution under the union's offices is the only possible way in which the conflict will be resolved. he's on the schools the need to strengthen that process rather than on the minor. second, some participants have referred to the quotes jurisprudence on whether we should take the account of adverse political consequences. when considering propriety the quotes to as prudence requires that to be an objective basis to assess the relevance of such consequences. in this case, there is an objective basis. it is the established securi

the people in gaza, on friday night, the united states targeted syria and iraq and killed at least 16 people and wounded at least 25 others. well, what does this all mean and what is next for the region? stay with us as we take a look at all of this on the spotlight. i'd like to walk my guest now to the program. elijah macneer journalists and political activists out of brussels and julia coast and journalists and political analys out of beirot. thank you both for being with us. well, let's start off with you, elijah, do you think that the united states is being hit hard by the islamic resistance in various places in the region? let's start from there. thank you for having me. thank you for coming. the americans are really attacking the position of the resistance in iraq and syria in retaliation to the attack that happened against their position on the borders because they are considered as occupation forces and legally they have no right to retaliate because they are not in defensive position but they are occupying two countries basically they indeed occupying syria. and in iraq they

i know oftentimes especially living in the... united states being far away from the situation at hand, it seems like nothing we do on the other side of the world is working, this is working, you have to keep doing. these comments by an ex starbucks parista went viral on social media, but this is the one among many feedbacks on the impact of the pro-palestinian and anti-israel campaign. starbucks has seen billions of dollars in losses and forced to cut its annual sales forecast. the company has admitted that its sales in the west asia struggled, but boycots also heard its outlets across the united states. mcdonald's is also feeling the pinch of the boycott as it has reported its first quarterly sales miss in nearly four years. the reason, week sales growth at its international business division, sending the company's shares down about 4%. other american multinational companies including burger king, kfc, pizza hud, as well as brands such as coca-cola, pepsi, puma and zara that have pro israel is stances or have financial ties with israel

a in the united states. which was not only monitoring his attendance to communicate with the deputy foreign minister of russia, but in fact actively interfering in those attempts. they were blast multiple times, multiple emails. so we know that the us government and in particular the buying administration, the kind of deep state that we talk about definitely has not wanted this interview to take place for a long time. and presumably that's why tucker carlson has to go to mosque out to allow for that to happen in an uninhabited and free way. and that's pretty disturbing if you look at it very closely why it a journalist are expected to always, always consider all the angles, insides of a story when reporting. what does the attack on causes blind interview approaches say about what's the immediate coverage of russia? i'm the war, a new crane that says every thing, it's a perfect so micro cousin for what the so called defenders. a free speech actually think about free speech, which is to say they disapprove of i

so i'm in the united states, don't white by that yours. what somerset we did not see conflict, then let's get the troops out of the, the not welcome. they are not needed. the indefensible targets for anyone in the region who wants to prove all the conflict. get them out. there's something that we do for the button, the administration to admit that the strategy of appeasing a wrong has been disastrous for the international community. and regional stability now is the time to present bought into wake up to the reality that his policy, if like, hey, you think your problem has failed to promote peace, america must project strength. however, among many sections of the american political establishment, war mongering is always popular. and while there is a way of, of those criticising binding crew, potentially escalating towards a full board with iran, there are some criticising biding, for they say not doing enough. not striking hard enough, not hitting these forces with the necessary ferocity. this is what some of the forces that are criticizing

the united states, george bush. thank you, ladies and gentlemen. thank you all very much. and i'm delighted to be here in rock hill. welcomed as we arrived by your mayor and the warm hospitality from others very, very apparent. first about your governor. i am so very pleased to be his sister's hometown and and parenthetically. only and i'd have to say maybe even more important to have i have carole's in this election, because you see south carolina is on the cutting edge. it's out front of the most significant political event in the nominating process history of modern political politics and of course, that what i'm referring to is super tuesday march 8th, when, what, 750 delegates to the republican national convention will be selected on that one day alone, starting in the west. from my home state of texas, sweeping all the way across to your neighboring states, north carolina and and the rest. so then all the way to delegate rich florida. so super tuesday is going to, in my view, determine who the next president is

the thing is that the west is not as united on gaza as the west — so—called west — is united on ukrainen, for example, of paris and washington, london and paris, i mean, or other countries, the west itself is not as united on gaza, and that gives our opponents and our enemies additional tools how to manipulate with western position on two conflicts. i want to turn it back to ukraine itself. we talked a little bit about mr zelensky�*s decision to replace zaluzhnyi with syrskyi as leader of the armed forces. "the idea," said mr zelensky, "was to find new approaches." this is a quote. "the generalship must be reset. "the army's actions must become "much more technologically advanced." what is the "new approach", do you think, that zelensky is looking for? i think that... i can only presume, because i've never had a conversation with the president on that issue. but i can only presume that we really need a technological breakthrough and we need new tactics in our military... ..planning an operation on the ground because, as you said yourself, i mean, the human resources of ukraine and russi