they have.hey schedule a vote. in this case, they put out an idea, put it through committees for markup, brought it to -- on the way to bring it to the floor and said they -- they set a die for a vote without first counting their votes. they don't have the votes for it to pass, as least not as of 15 minutes ago. they could get more votes. but as of 15 minutes ago, the republicans don't have the votes to pass their own bill. so if you don't have the votes and you're in charge, why would you hold a vote and watch it go down in flames? you most postpone and change some minds. it's a reporting of politico that the postponement has happened and the associated press is reporting the same thing. associated press has said the house leaders have delayed a vote on the bill, which setback the president's and speaker ryan's agenda. this just happened. we'll get our report from washington and beyond next. red lobster's lobsterfest is back with 9 lobster dishes. try succulent new lobster mix & match or see ho

who if they are not here that i do they plan on coming. all of the chairs and council members who have put forth great work. the program lasts one hour we will have a question and answer session, following that a book signing. we are thrilled to welcome the

they packed up and started to scoot as quick as they possibly could because they know they're in a high location. not a good place to be with a lot of lightning going on, so they tried to skedaddle as fast as possible. >> now they are wet and they've got nowhere to go, no shelter. >> you're looking at this in the complete wrong way. lemons, lemonade, right? they descend as quickly as possible. all the heavy rains created flash flooding in creeks and streams nearby. jeff falls in at one point. and they figure, well, forget about it. let's just enjoy it. >> but they have equipment. >> it's going to get wetter. >> this is all part of the adventure if you're going out to an island volcano. even the woman they had along on the tour was like, heck, yes, i just got caught in a flash flood on a volcanic island. and here i am, thumbs-up in a waterfall. >> this is so awesome. >> you know what? that's a really good point. the only thing they have control of is their attitude, so you might as well enjoy it. >> at the end when the rains seem to stop and the water reseeds a little bit, jack and his f

they are good at what they do. we have the nsa which goes after ,lectronic intercepts electronic digital types of information. we have the intelligence branches in each of the military services. they are there to provide accurate information and intelligence in a more real-time basis to our men and women on the battlefield. feelinges you a general that they each do you have specific roles with specific customers work consumers of the information that they provide. some are very focused on protecte information to people on the battlefield. there are others trying to collect more long-term information as to what the plans and intentions, the capabilities of our enemies are so we can plan strategically over the next 3, 5 or seven years to deal with the kind of threats we have. you put all that together and back in 2004 and a bipartisan basis we passed an intelligence reform bill that put in place the director of national intelligence that would take the 17 different agencies and make sure there was some coordination a

they want to throw it away and .harge us more money if they actually want the costs of health care, they need to get it off the stock market. that includes 4 -- corporate .ospital there was no insurance premiums at all. if we have to have insurance, .et off the stock market stop paying ceos of money. you probably heard republicans and democrats talk about the current condition of the affordable care act. re: worried about the status as far as the ability for premiums to go up and providers, moving out of state's, are you worried about what is currently in place? >> i am. i'm personally i'm on medicare and tri-care, a blessing for me. granddaughter is under obamacare. she loves it, her and her husband make about $40,000 a pay $79 a month and have an 8 -- $800 deductible. you can hardly beat that. >> with your from another shirley and pennsylvania, republican line. go ahead. >> good morning, thank you for taking my call. i have been following this for so long. we put up with obamacare for seven years. it is just a shame where it is going. there is one provider in a lot , and it is probably

that is what they want. that is ultimately what is important to them, reestablishing the racial order that has been destroyed by emancipation. i would hope people would come away from my book and learn from my book just how critical women wear during the civil war, just how much the civil war really changed gender roles and did that differently in the north and the south and the union nurses were heavily involved in things like the suffrage movement after the war. they are quite active. southern women word. it is much more hidden but they were politically active, they were politically active in white supremacy and i think that is an important lesson to take from

and they do i think they do is being pushed. like your stories on tv, about how much money it costs to, to protect the trump children. what do they want? do they want the trump children to be murdered? i traveled with the children of presidents around the world and they have to have secret service protection so are they are on tv and you say look at this money they're spending to protect the trump children. do they want leah and sasha to be protected, do they want chelsea to be protected, why would they not want, they want them kidnapped or mirror or something, of course not. do they want be active at camp david so they are given money so they kind of resent that and then there was a story, you correct me i'd like to know because i keep seeing online different accounts, there was a story that trump was giving back his salary or trying to find a way to give back his salary. if that's true, then the news agency to run a story and look at all his money he's wasted, he just down tomorrow lotto and not what he's taken in salary, i th

they decide they will accept jim crow. they will organize segregated unions. they will welcome black workers but they really wanted to focus on getting white workers in also. they thought by using this more constrained and tentative approach that they wouldn't be subject to quite as much backlash in the region and they ended up being wrong about that. i got all the backlash -- they got all the backlash anyway. they were accused of being supporters of social equality between the races, which was often interlaced with threats of interracial sex. in a few cases operation dixie steered away from that and into broader organizing efforts like this one which was the tobacco workers from winston-salem. and were able to ranch out organize in other parts of north carolina and the south. there are some exceptions. on the whole, operation dixie failed. in part because even though they limited their vision and chose not to challenge racism, they weren't successful at attracting white workers or black workers. maybe because of those things. attempt to create a base for prog

>> they say they stand up against them. and they are against killing and you should be respectful and not draw mohammed. >> in this case respectful is a bogus codeword. the only way we'll move to a real sense of freedom is if every time somebody puts a bullet in a cartoonist for drawing a cartoon of mohammed is every newspaper displays that picture. >> many won't. nbc, cnn and new york times will not run the charlie hebdon cover. >> why would you want to make them haid hate you. >> after the texas shooting some people blamed the activist. >> meanest is part of the vigor. >> hate is what it is to be human. >> polls show americans support laws that would ban hate speech. >> what is hate speech? >> if you apply hate speech, according to the things they say. the quran has hate speech. >> she group and under the quran. >> i was raised in a muslim family. my mother married me off at 22. by then, i was old enough and mature enough and i defoyed him. >> she ran away to holland and started to criticize her old religion. 9/11, i star

they say they were told they had to speak english, not spanish. they say after complaining their hours were reduced they went and filed a complaint with the department of fair employment and housing. they believe this is a violation of the fair employment and housing act. >> you to explain to the employees you implement this kind of rules. when are times you cannot speak english and what will be the consequences. >> reporter: forever 21 said they are committed to diversity and inclusion in all of our stores and does not have any policies with regards to the language spoken in our stores. we did speak with a number of customers and happened to run into two who were bilingual and they tell us they were speaking inside the floor and one of the employees started speaking to spanish to them and they were glad that she did. christie smith, nbc bay area news. >>> the trump administration says it is going to appeal, we are talking about the ruling by the hawaii federal judge that blocks the white house travel ban. the state of hawaii sued to stop the trav

if they feel the person will blow their money because they are an alcoholic, they might check yes. unless the person cannot understand the concept of this green he's of paper being exchanged for goods or services, they would never check yes. it depends on who is working on the file. i can tell you that plenty of people put on social security and disability while i was working there for -- working there -- things for antisocial disorders, things that would cause people to open fire on innocent people, they did not have the box checked that they cannot handle their finances. it is completely ridiculous. a second point, a lot of the older people i have spoken to on the phone trying to get disability because of their back or their knee -- obviously, they were suffering from a great deal of depression or ptsd from their time in the service. they would refuse to allow me to add that to their claim, because they were afraid it was going to make it so they could not have their gun. or that the federal government was going to come and take their guns away. it is not going to give us what we

they talk about it, but i don't think they know. and to have a bill that you start off with a $600 bill a transfer of wealth from middle class -- working families to the -- not not everybody isn't working, even the high en, but yb working-class families to the richest people in america and to say, i'm not concern about that. well, people are concerned about it because it comes down to the deficit. about the jobs, about the deficit, about the health.he not just the health care but the health of the american people. >> emery of "the new york times." >> i'm wondering, is there a point at which you would advise democrats to pull away from what is currently a bipartisan investigation into russian interference in election? >> you scrub this as a bipartisan investigation. >> they describe that and say we've agreed to the -- >> right. >> -- the investigation and there is a point at which you would say this investigation has lost credibility and encourage democrats 0 pull away away. >> you have it in reverse.ib i think they would have to mak

andh: absolutely, they can they have.nstagram in august copies one of snap's most popular features, it's story future, where people can create reality tv shows of their life. this is a product people are using on instagram now almost as much as they are using on snapchat, or maybe even more at this point. this will continue to happen. facebook's app whatsapp with , more than one billion users in the world had a similar feature added earlier this year. facebook is considering doing it too. this is a constant way of copying snap's way of doing things. yes, it does harm the potential. we will never know how much faster they could've grown if it were not for that. the company does not attribute their loss of growth to instagram, but it certainly is interesting. but one positive side of that, i do want to point out, is that advertisers say it is a little counterintuitive. advertisers say they can justify buying snap's ads because the format is now the same as as they can buy on instagram. caroline: it vindicates the business m

and they came and they did negotiate. now, i'm not arguing for a big increase in sanctions, what i am arguing for is increase the sanctions we do have, don't be shy designating where there's a need to designate. we should have done what we did, what the white house did with the missiles. the calls on the iranians not to test ballistic missiles. since they don't intend to have nuclear weapons, anything they test by definition isn't subject to that. well, look at what the ballistic missiles, look at the range they have, look at the payload they can carry. by the way, they could carry nuclear weapons. and because in fact they're called on not to do it, there's no reason the administration shouldn't be going to the other members of the 5-plus-1. but they're doing it anyway. we should be implementing the sanctions that we have. we should be -- where there are -- where iranian behavior justifies doing more, we should do more. especially with the other members of the 5-plus-1. we should look for ways to have an agreement, if the

they hated the republicans. they hated fdr. they hated the socialists. i mean, you know, so they were going after everybody. i mean, it's amazing too, the anger that was there among american communists. i was surprised by that. when you would see these documents, the fights that they had among each other -- so and workerud, exposing daily as a stool pigeon. that would be the order from the latest meeting minutes. so yeah, that, and also i would update this. in fact, to connect this to john's earlier question about modern day progresses -- one of the groups i looked at is the group progressives for obama. it is really starting to now cloud the whole progressive/liberal thing rid i have always understood progressives and liberals to be on the left, but not the communist left, right? there's variations, a full spectrum of beliefs. you have the very far left, marxists, and you move over, democratic socialism. but this group progressives for obama, one of the four initiators was tom hayden. one of the 94 signers was jane fonda. of course, we know what happene

they can kind of pick which investors they want.rian: what kind of people work sheelah:o you mean the staff positions? brian: you walk in, d where do these folks come from? male, female? minorities in the business? sheelah: sure. i will say hedge funds became very quickly one of the most efficient vehicles to become extremely wealthy. they became known as places to go if you want to get really, really rich. you can make more money and a hedge fund than at a big bank goldman sachs or jpmorgan. eventually, over time, hedge funds started attracting the best students out of ivy league colleges. math graduates from m.i.t., young, ambitious, hungry kid with phd's in science and computer programming. often these people are flocking to hedge funds. brian: where did you come from to a hedge fund? sheelah: i came from a very different background. brian: where did you grow up? sheelah: toronto. brian: parents were from? sheelah: my father is from india. my mother is from the midwest. brian: is that name indian, kolhatkar? sheelah: yes, it is s

today they feel they are washed up more. possible for them to endlessly try to repeat the glories of the past as they see them. i don't think you can see them as role models. but they look like people that we recognize, probably from the more extreme sides of our experience or our friends, but you recognize them as people you probably had in your own circle of friends. there is a violent one who will always be fighting. there's the chaotic one. i'm sure that's one of the reasons it appealed to people so much. it was unapologetic as well, he did not make any apology for what it was doing and saying and looking at and their behavior. it did not condone it or apologize for it. host: the more things change, the more they stay the same for those guys. danny: cliches are cliches because they are often true. this has name "t2," gotten a lot of attention. i'm curious about the genesis of this. theypeople think "t2," think of "terminator 2." you did not just want to call it "trainspotting"/ ? danny: yes, it did. we originally would n

they do not know what they are talking about. they do not know what they are talking about. when we see the c.b.o. report, we'll see what they do. i figure they will go back to the drawing board. some of our colleagues have said this is no longer about how would you do the particulars of a bill. this is ideological. we just do not believe in the public role. medicare should wither on the vine. how about their voters? how many voters think they should wither on the vine? i don't think so. three options, one, they do nothing and that's what the president says, do nothing and the affordable care act. two, they go back to the drawing board themselves, let likely to come to us and say. >> we have reached the end of the hour, my apologies to the people still on the list who didn't get to answer their questions. i thank the madam leader for coming. and i hope we can meet again. ms. pelosi: maybe we can talk more about what is going on with russia at that time. and i'm going to texas and the border tomorrow to visit with the people in religious communities. so we didn't even get to

they support him, they support him strongly and they are really defined by and as people process allf the news that came out in the last few weeks, they are defined by singular trust with him, you can see where they trust to get accurate information, they say it comes from him above all others. for example this is the group that says he was wiretapped. other groups are more skeptical this is a group that doesn't think they are, the legislation is nonpartisan and also see them trust him when it comes to congress and legislation or speaker of the house paul ryan and even over at the republican party as a whole. and this for me echoes a little bit of what we saw even last year in the primaries where donald trump was running against the establishment, the republican so-called establishment, and these supporters still got that. they still see him as the singular figure that can make washington work. >> dickerson: quickly, what are their thoughts on healthcare? >> well interestingly they are not yet sold on the healthcare bill and more adopting a wait and see attitude, which is sort of lik

only what they could carry is what they would say.you cannot carry it, you could not bring it to camp. they did not and where they were going, but they needed a few days to dispose of everything. these photographs showed them see ag up, so you will variety of duffel bags as well as suitcases. they were taken either by bus or train, and as i understand, the government did not want people to know they were transporting japanese-americans, so they had to be out of sight, so they had to put the shades down on the train. they do not want anyone to know this was happening. this is a shot of a family, and you see they all have these tags on them. d.ery family was issued an i. number and they were told to wear the tags when they were transported so they could be identified. they did not use their names. they just used the numbers which is part of the shame and dehumanization. how the japanese have been americans were evacuated. they are color-coded by where they were sent. the first one talks about exclusionary's. it is all the state of calif

why were they picked up were they unmasked. a lot if they're picked up in a fisa warrant, they're being amassed by having their name put out there, what ways were they described. there's a lot of questions that need to get asked. how many times was one individual followed? did their name get unmasked an why? but there's a lot of things to get followed up on. we're not on that position, multiple times the chairman is going to come up here and broo -- brief the president. >> you said there's more information to come, more information to come, is this -- >> i don't know. for the eighth time, there is no -- we don't know what he is going to come up here and explain and share and to talk about where we think this is head. we're not in the business to say we're trying to get to point that this is what they have. we have asked that people gather up information and what they have to what extent we will know soon. >> the mother of eric garner met with an official at the white house yesterday. she's looking for fairness and justice in he

they were also happy in the knowledge they knew what they were getting and how much it cost and they knew that bills would be paid immediately. so if they deposited the same check to their account and they've gone online to pay their bills that would have been harder for them to be certain it would hit their account after the check cleared. one of the biggest complaints is they put the check in the account and didn't know when it would clear and sometimes they needed to pay the bills right away, they need to buy food over the weekend so it was an expensive decision but also logical. >> host: in the book you talk about a situation that the customer is not able to make the 20-dollar payment and how you saw a surprising response from the establishment. >> guest: there was a a puerto rican woman in her 50s who came in regularly to cash a government check she got. she came to my window, i scanned her check, customer id number and saw her information come up on the computer screen and what i saw as a message that said she had to pay $20 every time she came in which i'd never seen so i aske

they believe they can sort of try to implement it. that means not only do they need to make the decision, they will communicate it very clearly in advance because there isn't. i think you'll know a good deal about this before -- well before it happens. now, the other thing that we haven't really mentioned is that if those happen a year from now as we are talking about it could be a very different fomc. you should take everything randy and i have said about what the fed is likely to do more than a year or so in the future with a bit of a grain of salt. it will really depend on -- you know, we have two governors right now. governor is leaving in april. the position is up in february of next year. vice chair is up in june of next year. so that's a whole new ball game. all of these things are things that, you know, in many areas monetary policy in normal times, most folks agree on that. it doesn't matter that much who is running the fed. these things are -- well -- >> i would -- >> that's a little strong. >> relative to these questions, t

they are trying to adjust to the question could they get this passed? they think they can.ld they slow down for the sake of the long term health and prospect of getting it through the senate. >> the question you have been putting on the table for weeks now, joe. >> nobody is going to convince me this is the smart move. start with tax reform and regulatory reform. mark halperin, i don't think we can underline enough to people in the media that haven't spoken to the business community or people marching the streets or people supporting. if you want to get donald trump's approval ratings, you have to convince the business community they should be concerned about the tweets. they should be concerned about the bizarre statements. they should be concerned about all the things that a lot of people in washington, in the washington and new york bubble are concerned about. a lot of americans across the country are concerned. they are just not. in fact, it is shocking just how little they care about anything other than regulatory reform and tax reform. they have completely compartment

they do have rosy cheek and rosy lips. they have those going on. they have the pale skin. they are fashionable with their brown hair. it's a little harder to tell that they are wearing cosmetics. they could be, but they had definitely -- if they are, it is toned down. it looks fairly natural. the main difference in the ideals of beauty from the 1700s to the 1800s was that the powdered hair is no longer in. you do see recipes for hair powder in the 1800s, but it is mostly scented. it is just scented usually. and you never really see portraits of people with powdered hair. obviously powdered hair. think of it as maybe a dry shampoo will little bit. so, to get these looks people are using different tools. usually they don't survive sadly, and neither did the original preparations. but portraits do, and here you see my dr. pompadour putting on her makeup in the morning. there is a cape around her shoulder to keep powders offer her clothes. she is holding a square box with what looks like rouge and it. she has a nice little brush. probably a camel hair brush. i have seen writte

they can two-time uber as much as they want.cause so many investors have poured money into uber's competitors, those companies are able to subsidize payments to drivers. uber is in a box even though it has enormous valuation. >> i have found uber drivers will badmouth uber and tell you you're better off if you use get or lyft. gillian: you have actually had people say don't use uber? >> an uber driver said you should use get or lyft. this is not the right service. these companies, snap inc., uber, they are like networks. they have a lot of eyeballs now. they have a lot of people engaging with them. i think there is a lot of value to that. but i don't understand the valuations. $70 billion for uber. it is just a taxi company. ♪ ♪ gillian: one of the interesting angles is the question of sexual harassment and the climate for women in silicon valley. by the way, i think it is fabulous we have three men talking about this because i think most of the time it is women talking about women's issues and it needs to be a joint conversatio

they are open. i hope they will work with us great i hope the speaker and leadership will have the same attitude of the white house does. let's work together and find a plan that works for the american people. >> one senate conservative urged jordan and others to hold the line. >> do not walk the plank and vote for a bill that cannot pass the senate. to speak with the president and ryan have suggested failure to fix the problem could lead to a bloodbath. >> if we don't keep our word. >> senate majority leader reordered rated -- reiterated the need to act. >> the obamacare status quo is simply not an option. we have an obligation to the american people to repeal and replace obamacare. >> the next step is the house budget committee expected to take two separate components assessed by house committees last week and combine them into one bill. it's still early here, people returning from their home districts. those who liked the package found something to like in the cbo package and those who dislike an

they help settle the difference. they can't do it. why can't they bring in mediators? >> host: you think they should take that on more legislation than just this one? >> caller: absolutely, why not. what do they have to lose? post a girl is waiting. independent, good morning. >> caller: hi, good morning. carol has one thing slightly off. they will not bring in mediators because too many bike here we have who shone and taught young. they have too many large donors that gave to them. the health care for the republicans to get rid of the taxes that were placed on the wealthy to help pay for the plan and the health savings accounts which means people have to pay out of their own pocket their disposable income to try to pay for it, which only helps the wealthy. >> host: borough in indiana. let our viewers know if you've been watching the energy and commerce committee hearing on c-span. i will head over to c-span 3 here and just a minute or so at 10:00 because the house of representatives coming in. we look at it that live on c-span. here on c-span2, we now take you to live

had they built the consensus before they rolled out the bill, they would have known the votes that they had. by the way, the president gets all the credit. he did compromise, he did something for the freedom caucus -- then he would do something for the moderates, people would leave. that should have been handled by the speaker, leadership. the president did way too much heavy lifting on this bill. he is the executive branch, they are the l cory. >> they should have never had an official deadline to get this bill accomplished when it was not necessary to be done in the first 60 days. i understand the budget reconciliation process but they were concerned with what the senate was going to do before they got the house bill done. you brought numbers and from the tuesday group, the republican study committee, the heritage foundation. all of the stakeholders who will look at this bill before it is released, compromise behind the scenes. if you can have a basic framework behind the scenes before it's introduced to everybody, that's the way to go. look, you could take marco rubio for his word or

they need money.need it to be deficit neutral to do this complicated procedure roman numeral in congress that would allow them to do it without democratic votes. to do that you need to keep it deficit neutral. with an estimate of $1 trillion of tax revenue over a decade that would help a four come offset the lost revenue from lower rates. it will immediately raise costs for retailers in the goods they bring in from overseas, and they argue it would raise prices on things like avocados, furniture, etc. carol: it will. it is simple math. if something comes in with a tax on it, it will cost more. >> here is the trick of the and economic theory that says if you do this, the dollar will appreciate over time. , increase theet buying power basically of u.s. consumers and offset all of the ups and downs and even things out. that will take years. oliver: it will chip away on what the exporters make. >> without a doubt. it would disadvantage the competitiveness of u.s. goods overseas if the dollar is stronger.

you charge people more for some of their living styles if the they smoke they would pay more if they don't smoke they would , pay less. that's what the insurance industry is really good at and once you get that freedom to do that people can pay basically the fair price for the type of insurance they need to be put into their cohort. host: jenny is next, republican line. good morning. caller: good morning. next month i'll be 55. i remember back in the early 1980's when i was working do you know what my health insurance cost? it was $9 every two weeks. $18. that's all it was. i don't know why they can't go back and see what happened there. then the late 80's, early 90's, when the clintons took in the health insurance -- i'm not blaming it on them. the health insurance went bad. then he appointed hillary to try to fix it and then it was just a big mess. also, they need to get those drug commercials off tv. it costs way too much money and it soars the cost of insurance and everything else. that's all i have to say. guest: it's interesting you mentioned the drug commercials. i was talking

instead they have to go through an enormous and expensive process that they argue, they sunt ha shouldn't have to. one example after another after another that they gave us to. and so we listen to the -- we actually does ask for their input wp we wrote to every governor, insurance commissioners. we said, tell us what's your frustration. what can we help you fix here. we extended the, i know it's unique, legislative hand in the federal government to say we want to hear from you and we will do what we can here. even trying to do minor things is very difficult to change is hard for some. but if we don't get flexibility in the states, we won't get innovation for the state. and again is back to -- i'll just give you, because we are now in this morning hour, my example of, my new friend governor herbert of utah. can you imagine having to come to a person, some person, in hhs/cms, to ask for a waiver to e-mail and nine months later get an e-mail from the federal government saying no. and governor herbert, you told me that $6 million waisted. this is the kind of flexibility, one example, we can g

if they really like it, they will downloaded, too.e: with companies facing increasing security threats, most tech giants are taking increased measures to prevent a data breach. this includes baidu. the company has revealed the steps it is taking to combat hackers. bloomberg's tom mackenzie has the story from beijing. tom: baidu's head of cybersecurity knows he has a fight on his hands. he says hackers test baidu's defenses every minute of every day. the most serious case was a team put together to steal baidu's prized automated driving technology. >> it is difficult to know who hired them to do that, but we know someone tried to hire someone on the ground to steal it. tom: cyberattacks can come from hacking and from international angs. baidu has responded by boosting its security team and backing what might be called ethical hackers, like the blue lotus team. >> now you are taking control of my phone. tom they showed me how they can : open up my phone. >> i will test out one website. and there we see hacked by blue , lotus. tom suppor

in trinidad, they said they used a graffiti campaign. candidate said i am a man of the people, and it was all a set up. there is a lot of talk about fake news and misinformation. that is the interesting thing about this company. it has been successful in using psyops. they measure what is motivating people and what might help persuade people from being radicalized. some of those have been effective, but some are the dirty tricks that are the lure of campaign bios and are questionable in u.s. politics. oliver: it seems like their role in the u.s. election was to work with the trump campaign and figure out where they needed to place their energies. that seems to some degree a passive role, but as you point out, they have an active role in these other elections and have gone beyond that where they have begun assessing potential terrorists. talk to us about their clients and who pays them for their services. >> they have had a lot of success in working for the u.s. state department. they just gave them a contract to measure potentially radic

for some, they are losing the choice they would like. they know it is not perfect.oth sides must find a way to work together to create a system, your guess is as good as mine. anchor: laura ok. for more on the politics at play here, i spoke earlier to the christie, a former advisor to george bush. this was an organizing principle of the republican party, a campaign pledge of i try. how much of a setback or disaster is this for him? >> is a very big disappointment for the president who has campaigned vigorously and said the first thing he wanted to do was to find a way to repeal the affordable care act, president obama's signature legislation. we have seen a flurry of activity until the last couple of hours for republicans who thought they were confident they had the vote. it is a big disappointment. no way to sugarcoat it and a say anything differently. the preponderance had seven years and today, they blew it. anchor: it shows in the party. paul ryan described as growing pains. is that how you would describe it? a disaster.ll it yesterday was the 70 year anniversar

charlie: do they feel they have been forthcoming? >> i think they feel defensive.you saw today when you have the white house offering up intelligence for the chairs and ranking members of the committees to come to the white focus on a specific case at a broader look of the russian intervention where the leak is coming from. they feel frustrated. so they are making these moves to try to position themselves or shape the investigation to go in a way they want. it canblem is it is -- be perceived as intervening in these investigations. the one place i would say they would point to in terms of being transparent is their willingness to offer jared kushner, the president's senior adviser and son-in-law, to testify to the senate committee. that is an unusual thing to do because typically any time congress asks for somebody inside the white house to testify, the president will exert executive privilege. they seem to be going out of their way to offer that up. they are trying to find ways to get ahead of this and appear more transparent and cooperative. at the same time, the

they were going to sand them, but i think it actually looks cool. >> they? who's they?h about this apartment because it belongs to strangers and she and her mom just arrived. they're from florida but they wanted to visit new york city for a few days. and they prefer to stay in a home. >> a lot better than being in a hotel by far. being in the city with a child is much more convenient because not only are his breakfasts amazing -- >> alistair long renovated his apartment then decided to try to make some extra money renting his extra space to tourists. >> i just love meeting new people and from all different parts of the world. >> that's why he makes his breakfast part of the deal. he advertises on air bnb which stands for air bed and breakfast, trendy loft, steps from times square, $149. in this neighborhood that's cheaper than a hotel. plus julie liked the pictures on the website and comments from previous guests like "the apartment is cozy. felt like a home away from home." >> not only are we able to use the fridge, we have a microwave, fresh hot coffee. >> i'll make i

if they think they will lose, they won't bring it up. it's never going to be -- >> yeah, but even if they cancel the vote, that's a setback. >> it's certainly a setback but allows them to keep pushing on it. seems to me based on how these things work, there will not be a negative vote. >> it's fascinating, and i agree, the speaker can do the math and the president will go and say we cannot fail, and they will get something through the house is my bet and the question is the next two steps there. the interesting part, again, this president is central to the process. this is not his signature issue. this during the republican primaries, the president came this way to repeal and replace because he realized it was in the bloodstream of base republicans because he had to be there, and in the beginning of the trump campaign, he saw the energy for it out on the road as he travelled and saw the energy for it on the debate stage. he would rather focus on trade and economics and immigration, but he decided, the outsider president decided to accept

but they did say they had access to their data, they say, we've seen in evidence that they were doing anything that was nefarious like steal or hack. but we're being unfairly picked on for being muslim. but a fairfax police report obtained by the "daily caller" news foundation investigative group says separately from that investigation on thursday, nuary 5, 2:00 p.m., samani galani called police after her stepchildren were denying her access to her husband of eight year, muhammad shaw who is currently hospitalized and police responded to the springfield home she shared with him. i made contact with her stepson abid who responded to the location, was obviously upset with the situation he stated he has full power of attorney over his father and produced an unsigned, undated document as proof. the officers wrote. then the officers say he refused to disclose his father's location, so he didn't even have a signed power of attorney, yet again, d to assert, and this is someone who was given access to the privileged here on material people pitol hill and i'm told by other i.t. professionals t

>> of course, they are human beings, they could. they are doing everything they can. when i was in intelligence we got ethics training, unlike people in the trump administration, by the way. we get over and over again. we were strict in our obedience to the law. by the way, no president can order surveillance. it does go through the fisa court and the standards are very high and very rigorous. when i as an officer took an oath it wasn't to a regime, it was to the constitution of the united states. kennedy: amen, you and i both agree on that. >> do you think the cia is subverting the constitution? do you really think that? kennedy: i think it potential for abuse is so stark and astounding that to be so naive to assume it's not happening is doing a disservice to individual liberty. i have to move on and talk to the party panel. i always enjoy talking to you. i think you are an incredible author. i love your book and i love your brain, even when we disagree. now the to my battle-hardened party panel. dagen mcdowell, and tom shillue. let's jump right into the fire. lawmak

much faster, they may be to some studies to see how they could convert these ships, they theded they could not so north carolina went into them and then the navy was going to strap her in north carolina and there was a big campaign to save the ship. she came here in late 1961. the north carolina is to the vef north carolina from world war ii . i am just awestruck with what was accomplished in 1940 in terms of technology, training, dedication to the mission. you could say the last war that everybody agreed on. i mean, everybody got behind the program, and the accomplished big things. -- they accomplished big things. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2016] 15,uncer 1: on september 1987, the senate judiciary committee opened hearings for judge robert bork, who was nominated by president reagan to fill the seat of lewis powell. on "reel

if they had to, they would walk into a emergency room to get coverage they want or the treatment they i think you could give them, a 20,000-dollars credit and it wouldn't move the needle. i don't mean to be cynical about that but are we chasing the wrongdoing and sewelling he is still going to hunt? >> that is incredibly good, insightful question. in the cassidy-collins plan we allow states to auto enroll people. when you and i turn 65 we're automatically be on medicare unless we call and say we don't wish to be. in this way if you automatically enroll young immortals, they are in the pool begin to lower the cost. we have model by insurance company, auto enroll the young immortals with lower premiums in my state by 20%. in this plan the house put forward it appears they would give states the option to auto enroll. if you make the credits sufficient to pay your annual premium, then there is no reason for them to opt out. they are covered and they contribute to the actuarially soundness of the pool. neil: but unless they dillydallied, right? your plan would call for this plan they're ki

they are citizens, they are voting. you get entire jurisdictions where you effectively have the equivalency of nullification. where the state or local authorities refuse to enforce it, or simply declare it is not a priority. jeffrey: we have a lot of great questions. we have a lot more to talk about including the revolution of the failure of prohibition and the repeal in the 21st amendment. would you allow me to quickly tell the story of this case? this is the central constitutional fourth amendment case of the early 20th century. it unites my two heroes, taft and louis brandeis. it is the most important privacy descent of the 20th century. you cannot come to the constitutional center without a homework assignment. your homework assignment is to read justice brandeis. if you come to the exhibit you can go to the original telephone that the bootlegger used to to make the sun calls to import incredibly profitable, illegal booze from british columbia and canada. here's what happened -- he is a wild bootlegger, making phone

>> they are not.n that happens, they are preventing it, look, a lot of these attacks don't happen. we have maiden roads -- inroads, i am talking about a operational perspective, it has to be done, we have to continue with effort with the muslim communities, whether here or uk or elsewhere. here, you have to make that effort. it is a big heavy les list to get mom, sister or cousin to pick up the phone, say, i think we have a problem. charles: right, sometimes it is friends that see something or hear something. this guy in the uk he had associated with known radicals, he came within the law enforcement across hairs -- cross hair's but he drifts out of it. >> right, the hard truth is that we're never going to be able to police our way out. there are too many weapons lying around, too many people to watch, i think most important thing to limit the ideidealogical influence, where it is tolerated by pakistan and countries in gulf so they cannot corrupt our domestic muslim institutions, our schools and mosqu

they have these tattoos that they know exactly.if only we heard it other places. moving onto the next item in his agenda after the healthcare bill stawlsz. >> i would say that we will probably start going very, very strongly for the big tax cut and tax reform. that will be next. abby: we have herman kaine on deck next if tax reform can get done. pete: that will be interesting. hey, millennials, meet your new democratic liberal auntie maxine. ♪ i guess you're just what i needed ♪ pete: caught on camera, panic as a through the lobby of an annual hospital. [explosion] >> oh my god. are you okay? pete: powerful video there elderly woman accidently steps on the gas instead of the brake in north carolina. i have done that as a 16-year-old as well. three dogs were rescued from the rubble. only minor injuries reported thankfully. and a wild scene on a new york city street. half a dozen cars going up in flames. a plumbing van leaking gas, igniting a trail of fire burning at least five other cars. the fire stretching down the block luckily n

they were saying they would buy assets here.ny announced two companies negotiations to buy right now. the chairman of the company gave an interview to a local media vehicle saying they are about to merger the company. it could be an acquisition. it's not clear. people are just coming up with all kinds of names that may come next. >> this is the big thing investors have been looking for. evidence of more m&a deals. do we expect more on the way? >> we definitely should. said lastar when he month they had a press conference to tell investors in the market more of what they were seeing for the company in 2017. ,e mentioned acquisitions egypt, saudi arabia are on the radar for schwab. it would not be surprising to see this company coming with news within a few weeks and another rally with these stocks. it was 10 times higher than the 30 day average. it shows people are interested. projected growth of 7.5%. hideo opiate is expected to remain -- you the opiate is theiopia is expected to remain africa's fastest-growing country. >> exper

they could only bring what they could carry, they could only take what they can carry and their earthlygoods were in churches and things which were ransacked. the temples were ransacked and people stall everything. >> one of those embarrassing chapters in american history and i share your concerns and an executive order should put places back in this dilemma, the prospects of wrongdoing. there are 1 million stories of adventures like this. most of them do not reflect well on the american, neighbors who were left behind, but as with the holocaust stories there are glimmers of white to be told so i want to talk about major letters growers in california, they were incarcerated and their neighbors, also letters growers took possession, after a while they came back, and restored that property, the biggest lettuce growers in america are the forms. [applause] >> i agree with you and we have a similar story about another man named bob fletcher, lived in sacramento and he was an agriculture inspector who took over the forms of 3 of his neighbors and they made life for him very difficult but he r

they don't think it's conservative enough and these conservatives, when they ran, they did not run as trump republicans. they ran as very conservative members in very conservative districts. so i don't think they are sitting there super scared that donald trump is going to come after them and somehow destroy their political career because they know they are kind of damned if they do and damned if they don't. they will have conservatives upset if they do this and you'll have moderate voters and moderate republicans who don't like the bill at all because they don't think it goes far enough. >> but, willie geist, what is so -- has to be so frustrating for people who are working for donald trump, 30 days ago, they would have been scared to cross donald trump. they are not scared of donald trump today. i've talked to them. they are frustrated by him. the constant tweets. he's wearing his own supporters down. i mean, i hope that tweet three weeks ago was worth it to him, because by trashing the fbi, the last president, by trashing great britain, by trashing angela merkel and by trashing nat