>> they are a couple of things and i think the two things happened simultaneously. to get this off my play them market department came back and said we prefer something a little punchier to win the sales and marketing department came back and said look at spying but can we think of something a little bit more punchy the jumps off the shelf, when they asked me that i was not at all opposed to it because i knew the book before i had done the research on it. and when i went back even as i was writing the book there's no time in lafayette's life which they call them lafayette. when they get rid of the aristocratic title the aristocratic title was the marquis lafayette and his family name was duarte. he would have been citizen citizen more ta not citizen lafayette. one of them gets dropped and the other thing is that the other people who are pushing for that kind of stuff were his political enemies. that's the french revolution with the red liberty caps and 1792, 1793 in 1794. lafayette is rejected by the revolution because the people who were doing that in the french re

those are good things. talking about housing, if you look across the cities and talk to people, housing availability, affordability, whatever the issue, it is a different but consistent issue. that issue is typically development on one hand. in charlotte we are 30,000 units short. in other places it might be the units you have are not fit for purpose, and others it may not be in the right locations. we think about three big things, one is the regular mortgage business. we do agency qualified mortgages and everything in between. that is standard 20% down payment. then in the specialized program, what we have learned over the years in these, especially for first-time homebuyers, we need to work with agencies in the local communities to identify borrowers -- to identify buyers but to also counsel the buyers. that is a $15 billion commitment. we will do several billion of that every year with a bunch of agencies. the third element is development. we do about $5 million of housing development work a year, loan m

so that is the first thing.d talk to people and i tell them look i am economist i'm really interested in how you are feeling about the trade-off between jobs and price increases. i like to go to areas where those margins will be more binding for people. if i go to the wealthiest areas theyey will say neither one is affecting me. it's thehe low and moderate ince communities were going to be least able to bear these trade-offs i keep hearing the same things i've been hearing this for well over a year. inflation is our number one problem. one young w s man and this was several months back probably earlier this year or last or a remember.ly it was so striking to me. he has a daughter, wife, he tells me what's problematic for you or what is challenging what you worry about? he said i have more job opportunities and i could take. there are only 24 hours in a day in seven days in a week. at a party working three jobs and i cannot do anymore jobs. every time come to the store i can't afford less in the cart. picks upp t

the first thing this interview. the first thing i want to say is you look very slim from the brandon lewis that i last saw for what's going on here. well thank you. >> yeah, occasionally when you see the stories and they use an old photo and i've had friends message me a few times saying, oh, you should correct that story. >> i'm like, no, i want to create the photo. it's the story you get used to as a politician. yeah no, i have one of those moments a couple of years ago when 50 and i had when i hit 50 and i had a medical and just thought everything but it's everything was fine. but it's either now or never. and i've always been big and i just thought, right, i'm going to i'm going and going to go for it. and so decided lose weight. how decided to lose some weight. how much lost.7 much have you lost.7 >> about and a half stone >> about four and a half stone from. >> from where i was. yeah. wow >> from where i was. yeah. wow >> something >> and you said something interesting there. you've always been this the first

, the o'leary thing. and and and and the difficulty is chasing down the sources, where do they get that. most of these books we are talking about have no footnotes or anything like that. most of my books are more scholarly. 50 pages of small print is not numbers on the page. this is written to be a good read. >> that is what i to say about this book. i have read a great deal about the chicago fires, this reads like a great novel. the narrative drive is so powerful, that can be on the front of the next paperback edition. i would like to talk about how you grew as a writer. did you see a pattern of growth through your books? you must have. >> they are all different in their own way and the great difference between this book and other books, it is about ideas but i wanted to be about people and events. it is very much focused on how people living in chicago experienced the fire. it will arise heavily on contemporary sources they wrote or as i try to come back and see the fire in their eyes and talk in terms

good thing >> right. good thing. good thing they won't find out. yeah you're >> right. good thing.thejlike n't find out. yeah you're >> right. good thing. good thing thejlike saying out. yeah you're >> right. good thing. good thing thejlike saying itut. yeah you're >> right. good thing. good thing thejlike saying it on yeah you're >> right. good thing. good thing thejlike saying it on national're not like saying it on national tv or. >> unseemly. it's unseemly >> it's unseemly. it's unseemly to me. >> it's unseemly. it's unseemly to mt. a bit own goal, though. >> it is a bit own goal, though. really things me are, really these things for me are, you the in the optics you know, in the in the optics of politic things are of politic where things are quite straightforward and sometimes can things sometimes you can make things look are. this look better than they are. this is for me that they is one thing for me that they could have avoided doing. >> yeah, he's being seen as a heartless villain >> yeah, he's being seen as a heartlessvillain opposed >> yeah, he's being seen as a heartles

just a generational thing. there are several things that have happened in our country and in the world that we as a as people, we got images fed to us on television. one of those for me was the explosion of challenger space shuttle. we watched it launch and just moments later, we watched it explode and we watched seven astronauts disintegrate. we watched as a nation in 2000, 2000, one september 11th. we watched airplanes hit the twin towers in new york. and then we watched in real time, towers fall on fire and. we watched it happen. so i'm i find it interesting that as a group of people you guys were too young to have a memory of where you were at those times and then made 25th 1986. i this one hands across america the eighties were a special special time but you guys should have a reference for hands across america as of last week. what is your reference for hands across america? it's jordan peele's us good. so when i think about the things that are have global impact that's one of them. so this is the world t

why are we not out in the park why are we not, you know, doing these things and the biggest thing is, you know, in at least now parts history in many parts history, african americans have always been there. they've always recreated. and then when they show this in the next couple of slides, but if we go back to the 1930s when the part started on the left, you're going to see superintendent egan. on the right, you're going to see a memo from superintendent egan. and to summarize the memos that was going back and forth in the park service, especially the one that you see now, is that, you know, just saying that african-americans, they don't really up a high percentage of visitors that go to the smokies you just don't see them. and at the time, in the 1930s and 1940, you know, shenandoah national park was the national park to start thinking about, really integrating national parks a lot of times, you know you may see comfort stations like the one that was built for the rich in the park a while back but you know, a lot of times you know, especially superintendent egan just didn't see the

what are those things,these are things that are timeless . amazing work because you know there are things that are timeless. we know the institutionsthat matter , don't let them capitalize you, i joked about pronouns but we know i get it, i live in a contested space too. don't let them talk about the fact that it's not clear how many genders there are. we could pretty much just keep playing men's sports, this is not hard. don't let themobliterate you , don't let them tell you you don't remember, we get it . it was great to be the supreme court they finally understood what the quality meant as well . it's an imperative . [applause] and i know so many white alumni are part of that . not just the supreme court but in states all across america who were working to create the quality and programs in schools we want kids to go in. a place where you want your granddaughter to be worthy of him or her. you're not going to be drawn into some crappy school someplace what they should be learning. so that parents have the capability of doing that. were goi

and they converge and that is one thing on this policy with social security and things, let us look atthe economics. >> that's why i have this package and the year of but it was this system and the federal government right now, what i learned in the process is 20% of the budget for you fast-forward 13 years later we have $200 million in reserves, the highest average which is interesting, we got this rating and lowest rate in history and what did we see happen? 12% so we think about the industry. growth consumption and fossil fuels so if we have a broken economy or a crisis, it will affect supply chain issues so we have to do some shoring up of the supply chain and one of the benefits of covid was it exposed some of the weaknesses. and in china there was multiple decades of issues and now we are finding what is best for us. what we did was this prosperity really believe we should have this amendment in every state has something like this, and how do we sustain ourselves when we are actually paying for this? >> one has demand >> it's about the same. and have you get this but the market d

one last thing. there are only a few people worldwide who can write a book like this because they don't have three values that i said. and believe me, just a few calvin was the right one that now i don't want to talk too long before i start getting the hook. but please enjoy the rest of the program and thanks for coming out. in this book calvin lawrence, a distinguished engineer intro grammar at one of the world's most influential technologies, companies slowly pulls the covers on why artificial intelligence fears so many black people. for technology professionals who are grappling with the ethics of deploying artificial intelligence technologies, and for those who want to understand, the hidden impact of the software might be having this book is a must. mr. lawrence shares intimate and real life stories on how subconscious bias data drift and misrepresented data that further disenfranchize people of color. how a.i. is not just impacting what students are being taught its impact on who actually admit

well, such old things filled the whole yard with things, but the rise is no longer ready to part withn. many, before getting here. they just lay in the landfill. is that where you lay? that's it. you see, this is the coinage, and once the eighties, the seventies were fashionable on the cheeks of the german seventy-second year. and in this house, when there was a war , these german generals lived here, you can see the stove from there. it would be necessary to go to hell, but i took a stroller here about 200 meters, yes, i brought it, and as for many years the yamish had to hear more than once from different people, that they say you can’t turn into plyushkin and pull so many different things, let even in his private museum, but then he didn’t listen to anyone, he didn’t take offense at anyone and continued to replenish his collection. to be honest, i won't throw anything away. there was absolutely a general, here some one came, here and there, and he even went here. oh, he says you're in trouble here. well, it doesn't matter where i had a mess here, but that's how i, frankly, do not c

it is not the worst thing ever. only maybe like the second or third worst thing ever. can we have more nuanced? i think cato has had things in the past of not liking the term of tax expenditures. you think of things in the tax code as deviations from what you get more abstract, idealized tax. and one can debate how that is. when you start examining them like a spending program and say we are spending more on high income people than low-income will, more for this type of health plans in this type of health plan, and not spending anything on youth you cannot for the health plan at all, once you start thinking of it that way, this is a very good example as to why the tax expenditure concept is so useful and forces us to examine something that otherwise is an exclusion. it does not show up on your tax form. you may not examine and think about it and reached the conclusions that if you divide everything michael said to, i agree with. >> it is a little lonely down here representing the current system. i think jason somewhat touched on this by saying, is this the worst thing

of so just a few things. one, i am thrilled to be part of this event and to recognize the courage of president truman to sign executive order 9981. an order, frankly, that is the only reason i can take this stage today as a retired navy guy. but even more importantly, it's the personal growth, truman's personal growth over his lifetime. i've worked in the world of political science, and we're talking lots about hyperpartisanship and polarization and how people are dug in on their positions. truman had the opportunity to do that, and he chose the more difficult, more american path of growing. and, yes, the work continues. this order was signed in 1948. if you tried to be, if you wanted to be an officer9 in the navy, very difficult even after the order was signed. when i went on my first deployment in 199, it was an all all-male ship, no women allowed. my second deployment women were only to be officers, and they refitted the ship to allow for female sailors to be onboard. that was 2001. my mother graduated fro

there is no such thing that never has been any such thing.on't regard us as their special friends. they don't value us particularly highly . they don't value us particularly highly. they will don't value us particularly highly . they will treat us don't value us particularly highly. they will treat us as they wish to treat us. when they wish treat us that way. if wish to treat us that way. if they require our friendship, then it. if they then they'll ask for it. if they want trample us, then they want to trample us, then they will, as they did, most notably in northern where they in northern ireland, where they backed fein backed provisional sinn fein against long against the supposed, most long lasting nato and world war ii ally. it was if we could only divest ourselves of this ridiculous puppy dog desire to have the americans take artemis and tell us that we're a good boy, we could actually have much more of a role in the world. the french, especially under charles de gaulle , but since have de gaulle, but since then have very sensibly take

interact all types of things. a lot of young people don't even know what it is or what it was. we have a book out about the card catalog and i was interviewed by this young man, about 25, and we were taking photos in the library has a mile of card catalogs still in the madison building. he said how does this work? i said you pull the drawer out, and you pull these little cards. >> ok any other questions? >> my name is mark, i am a researcher here on fiscal policy. i am curious, on the theme of strengthening democracy, do you see any role for libraries -- and think of it as a concern many have now about people living in echo chambers and seeking only the information that confirms their biases and things -- is there a role for libraries to play in presenting information to people that will challenge whatever their default thing that they want to consume is? or is that too far outside of what the mission of a library is? or does it necessarily put libraries in a political role that they are not intended to play? >> w

this is kind of a regular thing. but this is the first time one of us had actually, like, bought a book and handed it to other person. and that book was invisible child by andrea elliott. and tunisia is very much this book's evangelist in a marvel of immersive journalism, eliot followed the daily plight of a homeless family to parents and eight children in new york city. in fact, she practically became part of the family, all by embedding herself with them for eight years at the heart, the story is dasani the eldest daughter, a young teen full of personality, charm and moxie. we see dasani care for her siblings and navigate complex relationships with her parents, both of whom genuinely seem to love their kids, but also suffer from substance abuse and likely mental health challenges. we observe life at school, her life at various shelters, the obstacles of getting from place to place on the new york transit system and the challenges of finding and obtaining stable housing opportunities for advancement are scarce for d

well, what is the motif of this whole thing? although both wants the same thing. so do you think or you your assistant that or should i see your opinion is that we should actually comb with the companion force towards the company. now using a different talk, these bar should be compelling. we should be compelling. all right, thank you. i want to come to do, you know, i'll get back to you. do you know um, it was talking about identity. we have completed colleen, i because we have them on the fill out the fill out. so that's cool. and he's reading that nature as a beauty on we'll have him beauty and for the kids. now, the music, what do we have in comfortable that you advice on communions? or are these to be able to we have we have our own identity. i mean, we have a seasonal thing because see, we have so many odd sees that also be more cool. we have rep, i see that the book of book, always a cultural means and it means that between english and just song. so we have an identity now i want to talk to my pregnant lease right here. the keys hung up for a while before,

. >> with that thing behind you over your left shoulder?that's one of the campus, a bar set up they are selling beer and other things hanging out waiting for the festival to kick off. >> i wish i was there right now. that looks fun. >> a happening place an. >> of the when you're done working, go make friends, it looks like they are having a good time. thanks so much, appreciate it. looks like a good time. the backdrop going on with the controversy, they are saying is a big time basis because this was at the courthouse in 1927, the production company made the video and said there are so many things hannah montana, mario lopez -- why the controversy? >> it's interesting because it's so revealing it doesn't reveal anything about jason all the people who like his music, it's revealing about the people in the media and places like new york or d.c. who had this extreme predators about small town and people who live in pounds and these are people -- another time where this came about was with donald trump's make america great again slogan. all of

a lot of different things _ public to a lot more things.lic to a lot more things. lat of different things and they care about them more. and david mentioned the point that one in six people knew the name, why did he know that fact because the daily mail to the paul, does to help get the name out there. —— they did a poorjust to get that out there. we had an inquiry a few years ago the dome of the it's me that much of a change from the second one in the inquiry is not even going ahead and the thing that gets my goat is the double standards. i mentioned the johnson thing, by anybody�*s standards, that should be a story but she still has friends in the app. we know that strip parties, some of these journalists were at them receiving media pursuing them? know we do not. relationships between politicians and media, do you see that all over the front pages? no you don't. this is happening because this is the bbc and the sun. newspapers are a declining market and part of the war strategy is to get themselves talked about on the airwaves. if their

you think, well, what is that thing? and that thing is just all of being in it and being and doing this literally. most of us 20 47i mean, because that's what this business kind of demands of us. and you just have a feeling of, well, i've never seen this before and made me feel a certain way. or it may be i one of my mentors said, if you you buy, which i always thought was a really good line, you might have had same mentor. but i mean, i think that this idea that we're always trying to figure out it's humbling. we should always approach this. i think humility and to not really believe that we know frankly the hell we're doing. i mean, the one thing i really do believe in my heart and soul is that you come this with an open heart, an open mind, and you can't force any of these things. but when you do that. we are talking about creating a path of luck or, a path of success that you create doorway and a path of success by not cynical and. that's no small thing, after all this being in the business a long time is to never be

so that's thing. basically, that's a real thing.his is avoid hot chinese chicks who have a strange, suspicious interest in quantum computing because they're probably trying to get your property . your intellectual property. >> is an offensive >> andrew is chicks an offensive term? should i be saying just say may be clicking on me now? >> louis interrupts and goes, may. we've won. may. and then we've won. >> but you know , that's the only >> but you know, that's the only reason i did see if you reason i did it, to see if you would quite enjoying would are i'm quite enjoying testing. bother me at all. >> but i think what's funny about this is that we need to be told who enemies these told who our enemies are. these young they're saying, young kids, he's they're saying, young kids, he's they're saying, you should be careful you know, you should be careful with maybe not with russians. maybe they're not our maybe have our enemies. maybe if you have to remind people who your enemies it's that's enemies are, it's because that's subtle . e

it's it's just a thing. so there's almost this like kind of dual idea of what sex is everything and nothing that makes it something that you have to do and also something that you shouldn't feel anything about you shouldn't feel emotional about and so in pursuit of that ideal, you know young people especially i think who are really open to kind of be social pressures feel feel like they have to go after these encounters feel like that's what they should be doing and that if they have, you know, some sort of emotional blowback or a bad experience that's their fault personally for not being as as with it or as liberated as they should as they're told that they should be i want to ask more about what you just said one of the passages that i wanted to to read quickly you have this section toward the end of the book called what if we had less sex and you say the freedom of the sexual revolution seems to go and only one direction. we are certainly free to have sex in the manner in which we choose although for wome

we're gonna connect, not just people to people, or people to things, but things to things. and start collecting information about all sorts of scarce resources in the world around us. and all of that data is going to produce patterns that are gonna make us more efficient with all kinds of scarce resources. so, i see huge changes in the energy sector, transportation sector, health care. that are gonna come about from this connectivity. and to make it really viable, i think satellite has to be a part of. it >> kind of like the interment of things at scale. >> exactly. >> i can only imagine that there's going to be use cases in products and services that come into the market as a result, that we probably can't even imagine today, right? adding not just enhancing safety, but perhaps even creating new businesses. >> absolutely. i think it's really exciting. >> excellent. now, there's a lot of challenges along the way. >> that's, okay enthusiasm helps. >> i gotta start there, there's gotta be some energy. >> exactly. >> what are some of the images that were currently butting up a

and that's the thing. it's like it's the huge min thing. it's the, the physical aspects of the city. these are things that during the pandemic, we all because if you were in new york or in a city like you you didn't have all those big things to go to, you didn't have the shows to go to, you know, places to go to like this, you can kind of restaurants and it was that analog engineer of the city that actually was what made it and actually in some ways amazing like the dining shed with the outdoor dining i mean we as north americans, we would go to europe and you're like, wait we could just sit outside in italy and eat. eat. like, yeah, of course. so what do we do? well, of course we sit with the parts of the street. right. i'm sorry if anyone's italian and then you home, you're like all i can do it like. well, you know the you know the municipal code says that, you know, you know, we're within three feet of an egress. everything, everything. it's like, okay, now we actually to do this and that made all difference or the bike lanes were cities

everyone's fun things . and everyone's doing fun things.appens then something like this happens . it'sjust, know, then something like this happens . it's just, know, it's . it's just, you know, it's beyond words to it is one of my viewers are oliver has emailed straight in saying michelle how do you think that a story like this would get national coverage if it happened in, say, a city like hull? >> or is this national coverage a reflection of the fact that it's london centric? i've got to say , personally speaking, say, personally speaking, i think that this would be national news wherever this situation had occurred, like locally in this country, these events are very few and far between . you know, things like between. you know, things like this just do not happen in this country. you know, luckily , country. you know, luckily, thank thank goodness that is the case. but i do think that this would be big news if it was outside of london to, yeah, anywhere. >> i mean, it's a child is being killed. there's something an incidence happened .

but the important thing is at the end of the day, you have to explain things in a way that is accessible to the american people. and i think that's what the advantage of television is, that it gives you that opportunity, even if you're not getting an, you know, the whole country watching all at once, you get the opportunity to lay the case out and to have people understand what it is you're trying to accomplish. but, martha, there's big news of bin laden, a major policy announcement. there's also crisis and controversy. this is a news conference or a briefing room appearance by president trump in the middle of the covid crisis. and we had policy, but we also had controversy. chrissy, from your point of study, looking at cameras and the impact of television does inevitably crisis in controversy overwhelm the information? and we get distract it by that? well, i say you look at that you see of somewhat chaotic scene and i think that typified a lot about about the white house i think in in price's administrations do handle it differently like bringing in people who are experts, for example,

so that's thing. basically, that's a real thing. avoid hot chinese chicks who have a strange, suspicious interest in quantum computing because they're probably trying to get your property . your intellectual property. >> is an offensive >> andrew is chicks an offensive term? should i be saying just say may be clicking on me now? >> louis interrupts and goes, may. we've won. may. and then we've won. >> but you know , that's the only >> but you know, that's the only reason i did see if you reason i did it, to see if you would quite enjoying would are i'm quite enjoying testing. bother me at all. >> but i think what's funny about this is that we need to be told who enemies these told who our enemies are. these young they're saying, young kids, he's they're saying, young kids, he's they're saying, you should be careful you know, you should be careful with maybe not with russians. maybe they're not our maybe have our enemies. maybe if you have to remind people who your enemies it's that's enemies are, it's because that's subtle . enemies

the first thing, in a big way, i try to look at things in proportion.e peer, you had thangam debbonaire. i kind of understand that the things that divide me from her — although they are important and we argue about them — are the stuff of politics, are not the big things in history that divide, that did these things to my parents. i can tell the difference between those, that introduces a sense of proportion that is very important to my politic5, and hopefully a moderation and a willingness to compromise, all of which are vital. second, clearly it will have an impact on my attitude to the refugee cri5i5. we are talking on the day of the rwanda legaljudgment. i couldn't vote for the illegal migration bill because i didn't approve of that policy, and it's difficult to read the stories of the desperate search for papers for families, including my own, that form part of this book, without having a feeling that we need an international refugee system that deals better with asylum. but thirdly, and this is less common among people who have that view of immigr

if they don't get to that, but i hope things will get better. i get the level as you've been in that are we can do is hope on the one day and things will be the way we want to know so that in their voice being crises, some big, some small man, we've always had them or when it was worse, they said this was the youngest, it gave me anything. sometimes i lie right to our faces. got him about the people, believe it unless, unless there's the data. this able to realize that the additional talk is nothing but my i, but they say what i'm saying. like what, but is it kind of redundant? the people that are suffering to the situation that we most of the easy was came here before the resolution of the nose. now they have a lot of time to go to a heritage that the, the old visual loudness isn't all the same body. the whole process that it gets, but to baby boy, so long as it's yeah, it's approximately vital you keep the costs running it goes to. so we've had to be mentioned that whenever there's a problem, we have to solve it using russian old german talk.

we begin with three things investors ought to think about right now.s rally on cooler than expected inflation data, can the economy pull off the soft landing? big banks kick off burning seasons with strong number, more to come next week and we will tell investors what to watch. microsoft winning the case against the ftc to buy activation blizzard. will it lead to a flurry of mna? my colleagues then levinson, al root. then, once again, a great week for stocks. what powers the bible this week? >> is the numbers we got. we had a fantastic week, s&p had the best. nasdaq the best since january. a strange we balance will happen in the nasdaq 100 where big stocks got too big so apple and big tech stocks will be knocked down and that caused them to fall but they still had a fantastic week because of inflation, inflation dropped down 3%, it's dropped from 9.1 to 3% faster than at any time since 1952. it's amazing, it means the fed will not raise rates so much and that should set the market higher. >> i like bull markets but prefer hated bull markets to this bul

and second base ball thing.and so at the end their they they stop playing they all come over towards me their teacher comes over and you know in terms of the whole welcoming of a stranger the first thing he said, what brings you here? and i told him, he said, kids, gather around. let's hear what mr. king has to say. and it was like, tell us what you're doing? and i started to talk to them they were kind of taken aback by my commentary about just seeing their part of, the country. and then one of the young women stopped for it. and she said, mr. weaver, could we sing for, mr. king? and he said, you have time. and i said, i've got time. and so i went into their school. we went down the basement. they got on the risers there, about 30 of them. and they these two incredible hymns of the afterlife, which was so bizarre because. these are like, you know, 14 year olds on a beautiful spring day and they're singing about their longing for having but anyway. and was the as spontaneous like that saying a thanks me that i h

it can be about other things as as. and in addition, matt and lindsay will be signing copies of the book, which will be for sale. we really once again recommend what a terrific resource. in addition, this book is to scholarship. so we invite to come over and all of our virtual listeners and watchers. thank you for watching another episode of white house history live. we will be back next month with. another episode. thank you.

i feel extremely changed by the work i did, but i that's the thing. we lose sight that they are the folks that i interviewed from rural america weren't judgmental from the get go and shannon you know, oh, please go ahead. yeah, i was just i was just going to say this kind of proves the point of your book, which is when you look at data or you look at classification or labels, then then we all have assumptions. yeah. but when we are operating one on one, there really aren't those judgments. there really aren't those mean you didn't come to this with judgment, had you come to it with judgment, it would have been a different outcome than the book that you presented. but, you know, i think, you know, i always tell people they say so-and-so is mad at me. i say go stand next to him for 15 minutes. they can't stay mad forever. right and so i think one one of the things that that you talked about and and i think this is true from from work, you talked about how look at privilege differently. you know, there's been a lot of dialog. you know, we've we've got th

you know, i things to build on a line is point. i think the reason that assumed around that was in the company that being fund access to biasing or thinking cultural have been and they've just managed to arizona. and so i swear as to allergies, commodities to these countries, the kind of a roadway have been added more and more. and the best people with eric. well, i think you know, you can look at met. so i've had some great successes. instagram's, brittany has done very well for them, but it was that some of these things like for someone that already took all the way, allowing people to be able to can, i think, you know, they try to go off the assignment. what with what place that's never really kind of connected. and so i think what we find particularly in the us and maybe here as well as that, we think there's a limit to how much we want a company to really don't. and i are living embracing the times that i think, you know, develop that sounds nice. sounds great. where mega corporations do everything from kind of a call to say,

it's all of our lplmps lo— of my things. it's all of our things to some— of my things.tion there are couple of question there are a couple of rueslloms — question there are a couple of rueslloms .ls— question there are a couple of questions. .is, why- question there are a couple of questions. is, why do women questions. one is, why do women pole— questions. one is, why do women pole-rrle?— questions. one is, why do women hate _tate?.much?- questions. one is, why do women hate tate? much? and hate andrew tate? so much? and lpey— hate andrew tate? so much? and lpey-me— hate andrew tate? so much? and lpey-me lpe- hate andrew tate? so much? and they- me the fact - hate andrew tate? so much? and they me the fact that they totally do me the fact that i they totally do me the fact that l prwem-l— they totally do me the fact that i haven't said— they totally do me the fact that i haven't said anything bad rpoul—lpel i haven't said anything bad. about—the last about andrew tate in the last lwe— about andrew tate in the last pwe-ol— about andrew tate in the last pwe-op lms— about

but thing is, this is the but the thing is, this is the thing.hem and then you. joanna lumley says she'll go off to a drink and come back and to get a drink and come back and she who to give she won't know who to give the wine because can't wine to because she can't recognise the that she was recognise the face that she was just speaking to. >> maybe that's the reason she doesn't face doesn't recognise the face because had more because she's maybe had more than right. than one drink. right. >> 1 33 have >> but it's 1 in 33 people have this condition some degree. this condition to some degree. >> neighbour has it. really? >> my neighbour has it. really? yeah. and the thing is we were quite that of quite close and all that kind of thing. and sometimes she will walk building walk past me in the building and i'm like, hi. >> you sure she's not just >> are you sure she's not just being rude? no no, no music. >> you play the loud? >> did you play the music loud? no, no. >> did you play the music loud? no,but don't you bruce, >> but don't you think, bru

when you don't have enough of the real work to do things that other things to do. i think of things like the elimination of harmful language initiative at stanford where they wanted to outlaw the use of all sorts of language that people deemed offensive. maybe they should have fewer people on staff who are attending to actual idea issues and that they won't have time to read about the kind of language people using. in terms of the student experience that bureaucrats, these are often people who have quite a bit of contact with students your first contact h students to think about new student orientation students are getting their first ascent of what is going to like on campus, what's the culture, what are the expectations. they have these programs that are run by nonstructural staff get a lot of these people are totally in the tank for things like diversity equity and inclusion. they want to control how people think. they are coddling students enter the students pick up on that. i think to some degree they have this influence in students were students themselves st

that's the main thing. when i say that, i think the what i mean that influenced at the way i sort of a month on that. making sure that she gave me a way that it allowed her to see the logic with it. i thought that would mean that is it though, you know, way to wait on them, but it's all in the chick on the bank with us going other to love is a limited ask. what about the academic visit? i'm in the know, get a set of why therefore they took what we end up getting. so here's what i'm for, more than selling the forces. good again, as i don't even know because i will be that again the telephone is i really have them all out of emptiness in 3 and look on the bus, housing and stuff i saw smoke on profile. so i'm in, i was going to ask you what i thought uh if that had i. so if pull up that i chose and then they hit the last part of the scan. and then so as close as i missed that there was no, no going. but since i'm getting finishing it, i see, and i just thought of him when he got so so, so really the ana in the

we do all these things. -- read. we watch. we do all these things.hey all like the biggest change we experience in space, weightlessness, so we have to relearn all those things. you get to the space station and everything is familiar and you know how to use the procedures, the tools but now you have to figure out how to do that floating so it takes a rookie about four to six weeks to become efficient and effective in that environment. surrounded on all six sides by equipment and tools, how to anchor your feet, how to move around without knocking stuff off the wall but that is really the biggest challenge, the most expected and yet unexpected thing, how you are going to do in weightlessness. thank you. [applause] student: thank you. student: hi. i am a freshman. what was your scariest experience in space? dr. lindgren: scariest experience in space? um, so i think when we talk about fear, it is easy to think that sitting on top of a rocket that is essentially a controlled explosion, that there are a lot of opportunities to be scared, and i think fear i

it is many things. there are many things — resistant? it is many things.gs. there are many things we should - resistant? it is many things. there are many things we should have i resistant? it is many things. there i are many things we should have done years ago to avoid being in the crisis situation we are in now must we need to reduce emissions, we need to reduce emissions drastically. our lifestyles, where we move and travel, the way we eat in the case of food, processes and how we eat food has to change as well, we have to change the way we produce and eat food. we need to first of all have a really strong political will at an international and national level, to have clear strategies with clear action plans on where we need to act to really avoid the dangers of climate change and an increase in hunger. we also need to invest more in innovation and in protecting nature, our natural resources, and use them more efficiently, including the use of water, fertiliser, energy, and we also need... just on those things — energy, and we also need... just on thos

one of the things we're concerned about— one of the things we're concerned about is— one of the thingsor this without one of the _ is a big push for this without one of the things we want to be careful not to— of the things we want to be careful not to do— of the things we want to be careful not to do is— of the things we want to be careful not to do is over delegate and definitely not incorporate ai not to do is over delegate and definitely not incorporate alto nuclear— definitely not incorporate alto nuclear command control systems. this seems— nuclear command control systems. this seems like a terrible idea. our organisation put out a short film today— organisation put out a short film today illustrating the risk of over delegating ai, including nuclear command—and—control. i think we can all agree _ command—and—control. i think we can all agree this — command—and—control. i think we can all agree this is a bad idea we should — all agree this is a bad idea we should keep certain high—stakes decisions — should keep certain high—stakes decisions in human hands. i'm hoping that some _

we do not do good things because of that. we do good things despite the difficulties.al things going on in their likely see an area of need in their community. they employ their ability and discipline with their passion and help. to share those stories and army of normal folks helping those in our community. >> blitz play clip from the podcast this week with cooper. marx a white kid from intercity west side chicago could not learn in school even though it's free and provided for. >> i lost friends, iran for my life i've seen people take others lives to protect there's i have seen with some soldiers have seat in war but before i was 13 years old and i am hungry at the same time. and i wonder if my mom is going to come home. there is no way, after seeing all of that i can walk into a classroom and learn about who really discovered america or whs 50% of half? >> you know bill, somebody who does not wait for other people to fix problems, you have helped lead a lot of people to better lives. what do you find is the most successful motivator when you are dealing with kids th