why should | i trust them? why? do you think they can change? — i trust them? why? you think they can change? no. because _ i trust them? why? do you think they can change? no. because most- i trust them? why? do you think they can change? no. because most of- can change? no. because most of them, they _ can change? no. because most of them. they are — can change? no. because most of them, they are thieves, _ can change? no. because most of them, they are thieves, they - can change? no. because most of them, they are thieves, they are l them, they are thieves, they are liars, they are rapists, they are abusers, they are everything you can think of. i abusers, they are everything you can think of. ., abusers, they are everything you can think of. ,, ., abusers, they are everything you can think of. ~' ., .,, ., abusers, they are everything you can think of. ., ., .,, ., , think of. i like to hope that they are not all _ think of. i like to hope that they are not all like _ think of. i like to hope that they are not all like that, _ think of. i like to hope that they

there is, of course, no trust or, or very low level of trust. and from russia toward the european, mostly, ah, gemini, and france, end as they raised a very, very little trust us in europe towards russia. so this is as those of us proven now what it is also a p range. he's mistrust. a between nato and now you, you, are he ringing false or more and more people saying, well, ah, as a united states are acting without taking advice from other countries as are playing their own game and in some, to some extent, they have all sued, the major a europe and most of precisely germany. so we have, of course, mistrust between russia and nato. and from the russian side is perfectly understandable because of the declaration. often he says, merkel and mister francois long, but there is also now a growing feeling of mistrust inside the nato. and this is miss king. any negotiation extremely extremely well shakun, i mean out, it's during this entire process. harry, obviously washington doesn't care what the europeans think about anything. i'm sorry, but that's th

and many of the organizations on trusting government asked the question, do you trust your government in washington d.c.? the reality is federal government is made up of 2 million career civil servant spread across the country and across the world and the experiences the american public have with the civil servant is positive so part of what we discovered is we really need to reintroduce our government through its workforce to the american people when you hiret a positive news about our government and civil servants so we need to cover the stories and results and we have high expectations government was a betterh weekend line what i thik is the basic perspective of the american public they are currently doing services if we are able to separate the green and politician class in washington from the broader set of civil servants working day today in unheralded ways across the board to keep people safe and make sure they have resources and capabilities to thrive in our country. >> the veteran reaches out to the va and has a good experience, maybe not like a person to do the same. >> it i

what is that you can trust them. -- cannot. they have - trust them. -- cannot. -- cannot. they have to do things the right way. _ trust them. -- cannot. they have to do things the right way. police - trust them. -- cannot. they have to do things the right way. police are l do things the right way. police are getting _ do things the right way. police are getting the respect in the community and now— getting the respect in the community and now the youths are taking crimes into the _ and now the youths are taking crimes into the run— and now the youths are taking crimes into the run matters. knife crime, uii'i into the run matters. knife crime, gun crime, — into the run matters. knife crime, gun crime, the police are meant to be there _ gun crime, the police are meant to be there helping generations and start doing police intervention work with the _ start doing police intervention work with the youth. there is nothing for no one _ with the youth. there is nothing for no one nowadays. i'm joined now by nancey kelly, ceo of the charity stonewall in london. the minu

you just have to trust that they are there i i would feel safe, because you justj have to trust thatu — have to trust that they are there to protect you hie _ have to trust that they are there to protect yon-— protect you. no support from the olice. protect you. no support from the police- none _ protect you. no support from the police. none at _ protect you. no support from the police. none at all, _ protect you. no support from the police. none at all, whatsoever. | protect you. no support from the i police. none at all, whatsoever. the institution is racist. they don't like black people. so, yeah, some mixed responses there. some people wanting to tell me that even though they had negative experiences with metropolitan police officers, they didn't want to paint all of them with the same brush. but there were recommendations in the review. independent oversight, so outside experts to be drafted in. an overhaul of the vetting system. re—vetting firearm offices. a fundamental reset of

trusting the data is a big issue. how much do you trust what you're getting? you trust what you're caettin ? ., �* , how much do you trust what you're iiettin ? ., �* , ., , getting? i don't trust generally ve eas getting? i don't trust generally very easy so — getting? i don't trust generally very easy so i _ getting? i don't trust generally very easy so i do _ getting? i don't trust generally very easy so i do need - getting? i don't trust generally very easy so i do need some i getting? i don't trust generally l very easy so i do need some sort getting? i don't trust generally - very easy so i do need some sort of proof. i will say it in my sport i do trust the team and what they bring to the track. whenever they bring to the track. whenever they bring something new to the car, my car is going faster. getting one tenth, two towns, and that's when you can be confident. you're going to see the progress. you're going to see the progress. do you ever worry the data and the technology is taking away from the driving and the sport of formula 1? not at all. no, be

even your trust? everybody's trust.also speak to rishi sunak about the cost of living, immigration and the fate of his predecessor borisjohnson. and in other news... the health divide. why deaths from lung conditions like asthma are three times higher in some parts of the uk than others. a little less of every little helps. tesco becomes the latest retailer to reduce the bonuses of its reward scheme. supermarkets are making savings too. what does it mean for you? and another very mild march day at there today. we will see a few sunny spells around compared with yesterday. the full forecast here on breakfast. it's tuesday, 21st march. "institutionally racist, misogynistic and homophobic." those are the findings of a damning review of the metropolitan police published this morning. baroness casey's report says that a boy's club culture is rife and the force has failed to protect the public from officers who abuse women. the met police commissioner, sir mark rowley, said the report prompted feelings of "shame and anger" bu

is it possible to trust the majority of people, so their calculation showed that if trust in the relevanteden in europe, the leaders would trust 63% positively, so that now you can trust, then in england it was again a percentage higher than the gross product per soul in germany violence in the czech republic by 69%. there is, if there is trust like sweden. that is, we have huge losses from distrust, and in general, it is clear why we have these two cores of the country wanting different things, so i need trust. this is what, let's define it, this is a measure of the subjective probability that your counterparty will not cheat on you. you definitely need to increase this measure if the rule works and if sanctions work for the fact that he threw you, if monitoring works, that is, if the institute works, if it inspires you from childhood as cultural and sociological program, but the fact is that in order to build institutions, we must agree on what kind of democracy there are, and russia wants democracy to modernize karase , wants state participation in social justice figuratively. sorry fo

and what we say, wow, i don't trust the cdc, but i'm going to trust my aunt matilda. well, i'm going to trust this guy on the internet. and you know what? cells on a youtube? just watch that. okay, you ready? it's at the establishment thinks this, but what i had is actually true and they don't want you to know it. oh my gosh, if you lead off your youtube video that way, millions of use guaranteed. there's something about doing something that is not the establishment that is irresistibly attractive to us and i don't full, i'm not a psychologist, i don't fully understand it, but it's pernicious in our environment and it could be the seeds of the unraveling of an informed democracy. there's another pasted this though, because i agree with you. there are people who say, look, you can't trust the state, you can't trust the government. you can't trust the establishment because i had this great story, this great anecdote that appeals more to your desires, true. but then there are legitimate reasons, not to trust the establishment. i'm thinking, for example, about the history

caller: i only trust the republicans i never trust democrats because of -- they've got all these crazydeas and may have to include them in everything else. our liabilities are bigger now than our assets. and in our schools, -- host: we are talking about energy and climate specifically that. caller: with energynd climate where they learn that stuff -- i will not bring the up but i'll tell you this if we do not get more energy the price of gasoline will stay like this and poor people will not be able to drive their cars. i do not think that is fair to the people at the bottom. host: alright and in georgia here is rob in california hands down democrats have failed on inner decent day one with biden. prices on natural gas, gasoline, and electricit have spiked. that is not the biggest concern of americans. do you agree or disagree with him? and on everything he said we want t hear from you this morning. democrat, republican, and independent is how we are divining the lines. re is theew york times headlines recently on how biden got from noore drilling when he was running from -- for preside

, it's not even accelerated anti-trust. if congress passes this bill, we're going to see a generational landslide of litigation over concepts like critical trading partner, fair and neutral search, and intrinsic to a digital project the negative enforcement of anti-trust and enforcement brought by agencies moving through the federal court at the same pace of anti-trusts are doing less good. >> so 133lators, and still from 1890, haggling over it, developed over time a pretty sound understanding of what we mean. we developed this, this could be another 130 years of exploratory litigation and be really good to fund the private college educations of the children of lawyers everywhere, but could create chaos. >> this is going to cost the economy a fortune in compliance costs and attorney fees, even before we get the foregone innovations or failure to protect consumers, i would love to see us take a fraction of that money and use it to support anti-trust enforcement. >> let's talk about the markets. it of course banned dominant a

we don't trust the government, we don't trust our representative in the knesset. we do not trust them, we do not trust the coalition, but we need always to keep one eye open on the opposition because we do not know -- first of all they do not control the situation. they rarely speak at our demonstrations. in tel aviv they never speak. we are the ones moving that forward a mass amount of people. i will just translate to the sentiment we have. we do not trust far right fascist representatives. we do not want them. the majority of israeli people do not want jewish supremacy in israel. we do not believe it. on my shirt you see democracy for all in hebrew, arabic, and english because we still believe even though they try to erase the language from israel, we want democracy for everyone and we do not want those settlers inside the government. this is what we shout and chant in the streets, that we do not want homophobic, racist, fascists in the knesset and the government. we deserve better this government. we deserve a government that works for us. remember we are in th

we don't trust them. we don't trust the coalition. that's for sure. but also we need always to keep one eye open on the opposition because we don't know, 1st of all, they don't control the situation. they rarely speak in our demonstrations, intel, of, if they never speak. and because we are there one that moving that forward mass amount of people. so we have a trust because we don't, as you can say. but really before we have talked about the polls. so i would just translate it to the sentiment that we have. we don't trust the far right, a fascist representative. we don't want them. the majority of israeli people do not want a jewish, a supremacy in israel. we don't believe it on my shirt. you see is the democracy for all in hebrew, arabic and an english because we still believe, even though they try to erase the arabic language from israel. we still want democracy for every one and a we don't want those settlers inside the government. this is what we shout and we chant in the streets that we don't want homophobic racist and fascists. in thickness that

we put a number of questions to the southern trust.ic death is the subject of a coroner's investigation in which it is fully engaged and a psni investigation and was unable to comment on specific issues as a result. the trust offered its condolences to the family and said it will continue to offer them support. it said it has implemented a range of measures in bluestone to improve the quality and safety of care. in the years since sean's death, sinead boyle doesn't think the questions she has have been fully answered. two and a half years can ijust say is actually a long time. this process has been so long, so slow. i don't really know why, but in that time, i have fought for the truth. sean. what's life like without him? life is a... ..lonely. it can be lonely because he was so full of life. and he was my child. he was my baby. i was his mummy. and he's not here any more. i have to change my way of living because i can't change what happened and i can't change him not being here. the sad part about this is it didn't need to be like th

you know, we're talking about trust and building trust. and i will tell you going back to secretary azar, i made the suggestion -- america needs to hear from doctors that are treating covid patients. i think that would be the most helpful. that's who they know. that's who they trust. those are the people in the trenches. not from politicians. and not from someone who's never at bedside. who's just in the lab. the origins of this is important. because when we talk to doctors who are treating patients, for example, this is where i think early on it was most important, because all they were concerned about and all americans were concerned about is whether they were going to live or die. and will you come up with a cure or a vaccine? that's all they worried about. but as we tried to move forward, the origins of this is important so we don't have to struggle in the same way that we did through all of this. and trust is important. dr. redfield, i agree with you on the declassification. hopefully we will get there. it's important for transparency

i think that helps build trust. this week actually, on scripps news, we will be dedicating a tremendous amount of time to explaining the story behind the story. because we use news literacy week as a vehicle to take time away from even other news to try to develop that authenticity that gets, that gets count -- kinda papered over. >> i agree with all of that. i think we are proud of the rigor of our journalistic process. we also know that we have to work harder to make it visible to our readers, and not assume that people understand, for example, we had a reporter who knocked on someone's door to try to get comment and was accused of invading privacy. we think these things can be easily misunderstood despite being essential. we have done things like our video team doing a series interviewing people on staff about how they do their work, that exists on our site. some of the most popular story forms we do are when we take material and documents and annotate them, making the source material available to readers, that i

the findings from the sutton trust tally with exactly - the sutton trust tally with exactly what studentsir studies. those numbers from the sutton trust poll come in at 49% of students who have done that since september, 31% they have done so more than once, and 6% say they have done so several times. 0ne and 6% say they have done so several times. one of the students i spoke to, heidi, at one stage, she had threejobs, just to to, heidi, at one stage, she had three jobs, just to make sure she could pay her rent. she is in her second year, at leeds back at university. she got an e—mail from the university asking why she was not attending lectures as frequently as she should be. she has since cut back on her at work. even before christmas, again, another instalment of rent was due in the new year, and she was working up to 45 hours per week to make ends meet. —— leeds beckett. 0ther week to make ends meet. —— leeds beckett. other students are going onto campus simply to stay warm. i spoke to a student at leeds university and he said he goes onto campus, not only to charges equipment, to mak

trust among .an politicians on either side of the political spectrum _ american politicians on either side of the political spectrum and - american politicians on either side of the political spectrum and the l of the political spectrum and the inability— of the political spectrum and the inability to— of the political spectrum and the inability to verify _ of the political spectrum and the inability to verify the _ of the political spectrum and the inability to verify the claims - of the political spectrum and the inability to verify the claims of l inability to verify the claims of the ceo — inability to verify the claims of the ceo of— inability to verify the claims of the cso of tiktok— inability to verify the claims of the cso of tiktok of— inability to verify the claims of the cso of tiktok of the - inability to verify the claims of the cso of tiktok of the data. the ceo of tiktok of the data privacy — the ceo of tiktok of the data privacy steps _ the ceo of tiktok of the data privacy steps t

i think that helps build trust. this, week actually, on scripps tv stations and, news we will be dedicating a tremendous amount of time to explaining the story behind the story. because we use news literacy week as a vehicle to take time away from even other news, to try to develop that authenticity, that were poor. that to, often i think, gets papered over. >> i agree with all of that. i think we are very proud of our journalistic process, and we also know that we have to work harder to make it visible to our readers, and not assume that people understand, for example had a reporter who knocked on someone's door to try to get a comment. and then was accused of invading privacy. that sort of thing. things that we take is fundamental to the journalistic process. in fairness and reporting, can very easily be misunderstood. we have done things like our video team today series interviewing people on staff about how they do their work and that exists on our site. some of the most popular story forms that we do when we ta

second trust to the majority.means that you can learn to understand others, that you can trust not only your own, because they will take you in battle they will cover against the next street, but to everyone or or as much as possible to everyone because why is the level of uh generalized pressure much higher in the megapolis trust to the majority, i will tell you but a person came from closed communities and faced a large number of very different people if he he doesn’t trust, he can’t have a premise at all, so that after all this person must be trusted , shows krug remember when he came to vendettas. at the end of the day he said, how glad i am to see you dream and the third, yes and the third d is contract with the ability to understand what is in your individual formula for success. you need to write the existence of other people, just as other individuals will write you in theirs. i would say that russia is a very complex project. here is a national economic consultation stitching, but this is our project alex

thanks and it replied, trust and safety chief. your old ross, i spoke, checked a number of these accounts, and virtually all appear to be real people. so the willing gauge, men center or gcs, basically funded by the u. s. government, the and of course it claims to exports or boss disinformation or foreign propagandized also funds the digital forensic lab. and i think the actor we talking about there don't jeezy also in the past has targeted so rule. although social media, all calm, some 500 accounts, that it alleged that was engaged in a spreading rezani and this informational or 5000 on some, 5500 accounts stuff. chinese guns, in fact, they said were involved in a spreading state back when new pollution and now they have india on their list as well. but very interesting, the timing of this revolution. because remember the u. s. equity stayed on the brink and was a new delhi for the super embarrassing for him and his government, remember, he was here to attend the g 20 for ministers need and the cord meet as well earlier today. al

order it here, get it shipped to you in a trusted manner and deploy it. the supply chain question is a foundational one and make no mistake, it will require trading a little bit of the operational convenience and cost optimization for security over time and that is a trade that it islways going to involve a judgment call, but a shift in that direction is well warranted. >> thank you for that. yes, go ahead. >> thank you very much. james stephens. you mentioned a few things that i wanted to ask you to dive a little deeper into. first of the threshold of armed conflict, that remains ill-defined in the international space. so how does the u.s. cyber strategy address acts of aggression that would rise to that threshold? and the main reason why i am interested in getting a particular answer on thi is because you talked about engaging insurers. as you know, insurers will exclude x from their policies so how is that determination to be reached in the united states? >> that's a great christian where acute -- that's a great question. part of it because there shoul

who can you trust? you can't trust corporate america. guess what? i don't trust corporate america. don't trust big oil. i don't. i don't trust them anymore than i trust any of the big government bureaucrats that decide what's best for me. i do trust the market. i do trust people being able to go out and use their capital to go out and produce the best energy for the american people. but this administration, my democratic colleagues, don't want to do that. as exemplified by the fact that the president of the united states dumped 300 million barrels out of the strategic petroleum reserve last year heading into an election. 300 million barrels they cut the strategic petroleum reserve in half. in order to bail out their election because their policies were so bad. even goldman sachs, even goldman sachs is saying that the so-called inflation reduction act, which massively expands unreliable energy, would cost $1.2 trillion. that's the truth. i rise in support of the rule for this bill. i think it's critically important we take a massive step forward to try to ensure that we open up expl

but that relies on trust, and in london that has fallen significantly. 89% of londoners trusted the metg to a low of 66% one year ago, the most recent figure is 71% and the expectation must be that today's report will see trust plummeting still further. why should i trust them? why? do you think they can change? no. because most of them, they're thieves, they're liars, they're rapists, they're abusers, they're everything you can think of. i like to hope that they're not all like that, and at the end of the day they are the people protecting us so it's not good to hear that. i've got friends that. want to join the police but because of the racism it's put them off _ in the short—term, today's report is actually going to make it harder for the met to do what louise casey recommends, to recruit many more women, people from ethnic minorities and the lgbtq+ community. police morale will also be damaged by the review�*s ferocious criticism. and it's notjust in london. police forces across england and wales are vetting all their officers and every misconduct hearing, every court case, may furt

and we saw today indeed, the opening of this huge project showed the ability and trust that we had in contractors and in the domestic companies, and this in itself is an honor . the result is that the result of trust and the result of this solidarity and empathy was in the complex process of this mega project. before i complete this product for acceptance , i would like to offer you two points regarding the operation and start- up of this refinery. important characteristics that it was that in the shortest period of time, we reached the exploitation of each of the gas rows, which is a short summary of the implementation of this project, from your lady, that the area of ​​this refinery to the tenants is 370. this is the shortest time that you said, if we want to be more precise. the difference of this year for you is that from the beginning of our launch of refinery units , which is usually the case with the launch of the badam qebelsham unit , we launched our first air production unit on 29 4400 months, and we also moved forward month by month from your production units to that we rea

the trust apologised unreservedly.the concerns that were raised about west lane hospital, and what is striking is that it says there wasn't enough scrutiny by nhs england itself or the care quality commission, and that following these recommendations now, nhs england must carry out a full review within six to 12 months. as for the tees, esk and wear valleys trust, it says... meanwhile, the families left traumatised by what happened there hope today's recommendations will ensure every mental health patient gets the treatment they expect and deserve. fiona trott, bbc news, darlington. if you are suffering distress or despair and need support, including urgent support, a list of organisations that can help is available at bbc.co.uk/actionline, or you can call for free to hear recorded information on 0800 066 066. the time is 13:18. our top story this lunchtime... a damning review into britain's biggest police force — the met — accuses it of instiutional racism, misogyny and homophobia. and still to come, concerns about th

what do you trust in artificial intelligence? and actually intelligence, which is because inform human minds and what we find because ultimately read the humans other creators. and like if you got to look at the challenge b t, it is now a, you know, more into some controversial things and like, you know, the recently in the new check, the news, the last thing on promotion, which is be divided by chance should be mentally high and then it was a good adornment, is definitely going to release the national security. the secret. i wouldn't say that if i read and i have a google map, i will trust will let them die. because google tells me it is the traffic jam, which is the shortest route on which is the right route for me to reach an estimation. my driver if i depend on him, even a big but got an order in a traffic with more time. and so it is not logical to say that does because either or it depends how the system as a role, what is the credibility of the board, how the system is going to be happy? you still use your consciousness, y

we can be trusted by people, thank god this trust is still preserved in our media.the question of trust, who can be trusted. is it possible to trust this or that expert? maybe these are fakes, but to filter, but to see, uh, really fake some experts, unlike them from those who really, but have their own position, there is experience behind this. here, therefore, my words prove numerous questions even the agents conduct, and there a very low percentage of people know about the existence of some kind of alternative office abroad, but more than half of them trust the state snakes, which is also, as it were, for them, probably, shocking figures, and here, of course , a great merit of the domestic journalists of us all, but at the same time we had a guest, and the first project. uh, the belarusian academy of arts svetlana vinokurova and she said that you can’t discount the state media either. and fakes, which are also prepared by professionals. let's hear what she said, not the state media and our opponents are sometimes called independent media but in my opinion. this is

. it was performing health trusts. and years and at the trust that hasn't been dealt with. and at the trust that hasn't been dealt with-— and at the trust that hasn't been dealt with. .,, ., ., ~' dealt with. those who work there told us- -- — we are going to the house of commons where there are urgent questions about impartiality and the bbc. the bbc is a about impartiality and the bbc. tie: bbc is a world—class broadcaster, great adventure and cultural institution producing some of the best television and radio in the world. the impartiality of the bbc is a publicly funded broadcaster goes to the heart of the contract between the corporation and all the licence fee payer it serves. this is where the royal charter, along with the underpinning from working agreement, enshrines that the bbc be impartial. the bbc�*s mission requires the bbc to act for the public interest serving all audiences through the provision of high—quality impartial output which inform, and entertain. the bbc�*s first public purposes to provide im

do you trust the company when they come out and say everything safe? we tested every no, i don't know. i know what i felt, my lungs, i've got healthy ones that have done there and now, but how he trust somebody is telling you, well, it's only going out a mile when you live 3.3 miles away and i walk outside the morning of my lungs and burnt. i felt like they were on fire the time i walked out and walk back in. so now i don't trust anything. i don't think there's any content feelings around there. my experience has been the people are still pretty much up in the air and uninformed and feel like they've been manipulated. do you think that the do you think that the company should be trusted when i say everything safe? everything's good to go. ah no, i don't trust them. we don't know what's in the air, we don't know what's in our homes. now. another issue that is being raised is the issue of the private contractors that were hired to collect samples in the area. according to gray is the company tetra, tech that was hired is owned by black rock and by vangua

to manage miss trust . some have turned to foreign companies to print out balance with expensive security features like those used on bank notes. others have procured costly electronic voting machines to minimize fraud, setting the taxpayer back. but unfortunately, the votes were still contested. kenya's 2022 election for instance, cost the state $370000000.00 to run, yet was still contested at the supreme court with the losing candidate alleging criminality. the countries, previous election in 2017 cost $500000000.00 and saw the presidential results nullified due to quote serious irregularities. so while countries in africa started opening up to democracy 3 decades ago, the region is still characterized by weak institutions, manipulation of electoral law. and serious limitations of civil and political rights. all of that contributes to low level of trust in a fair and free election. and voters and candidates do not believe in the institutions, processes and structures behind an election. then there is litt

trust is a valuable activity. trust, in this case, we did not look at .h centers in november. i also know in december. well, there i did not see a significant decrease. these are still mostly positive evaluations , mostly positive, but they are not as high as they were, say, in the morning , that is, the basic stability still remains high, but the different opinions of the finalists are far away, so that you understand now it means 97%, 95% believe in victory, this is it, and only a tenth do not believe in it - i believe that this victory will be achieved in the next year , this is a dominant petition, this is more than half , so this year we will win, but i have to tell you what in may, the majority believed that it would be necessary in a few months, that is, you understand, now the process of setting up for a longer period is underway, the ukrainians also understand that the enemy is so terrible, they are also not exhausted, it takes away the belief in victory, the fact that the ukrainians can be somewhat more comparable to may a more critical attitude