won: tss. ma come he. woman:h! ha ha man:hoa! man: wai jason. legs, jason. jason: mpants arfalling. woman:ude. jas! son: lads! partyt my pla tonigh you comg? profsor: thebserver fect. sily obserng a phemenon chans that pnomenon.nce we desire tknow somhing we impact t object our obrvation. most pround irony.t raiseshe questn how we accot for ouown imct? is wt we s truly t ll storyand most imrtantly,an we trt what see? [music plang loudl [suting] man: wo! man two:hoo-hoo-o-hoo! [beep] [indtinct chter] [music ctinues] woma hera. o we thout you wereera. cassandr no. casndra. won: well,f you sehera, would u let her ow that 's her rn? jason:era! ce playith us! cassdra: jas's havinfun. woman:oys justant whathey can'have. jason:oh! woman:o yowant to in? cassana: i gotractice the morning.ey, and do you, jan. jason:hanks, m. h! cassandr oh! [mic conties] [lauter and atter] hera ra? ra! hera! hera: . ssandr you psed out. ra: ... did. diyou do ts? cassandr no. i w at the brary. hera: lily story [vomits] [cghing] n: i gothose. woman:eh heh h. n: theseren't mi. woman: a right. 're done [music pyi

the type of vehicle is a certificate that confirms the safety of the car from the tss is valid throughout the territory of the customs union, if you do not know its number, then you are expected additional costs will be required to obtain a safety certificate from a special accredited laboratory. if no additional changes were made to the design of the vehicle, then additional documents will not be required. if the car has any modifications that e, it is necessary to register, for example, the installation of additional package mouths. uh, some additional power bumpers or lebe. uh, all these changes require an additional document. uh and transport type conformity certificate facilities. e, this will require an additional visit to madi, where these documents will be issued, but this e requires quite a lot of time and effort on the part of the new owner, but buying a car with a customs clearance foil. risky occupation the belarusian decree states that the car is purchased for personal use, and if the owner, who has the right to reimburse half of the duty, resells it to a citizen the next day

i had it tss ei clearance for almost a decade. in the decade of having it, i never once left a facility with those documents. that's how closely held they are. the president dove has a sweeping ability to declassify the documents. however there's two things that can be classified -- [inaudible] that is the most concerning to me. could be in these [inaudible] and that puts peoples lives at risk. >> totally makes sense. what about you, danny, because the statues driving the warrants include obstruction and espionage. from a legal perspective, how do you interpret that? >> espionage act sounds really bad, but when you go back, you remember that the espionage act was also the same basis, the same section was the basis for the investigation into hillary clinton's emails, and for those involved in those classified information. even those, james comey concluded that no reasonable prosecutor would bring that case, even though there may have been violations of the espionage act. the espionage act is obviously very serious, but it doesn't n

among those were classified documents that were even tss sihai documents, perhaps the most sensitivet are marked as classified. if they were to fall into the wrong hands, especially given the fact that the warrant specifically sets up that the espionage act might be at play in woven defense related information that is extremely disturbing and we need to know who if anybody might have had access to those documents and what is the damage to our national security potentially. >> to that answer we still don't know why donald trump took the sensitive documents and, then by the, way feel to return them after being subpoenaed in the spring. can you explain to americans why it should matter that trump kept this material and why any of his a hois's or should face criminal library liability if they broke federal laws. i think for a long time we have had very serious concerns about donald trump as well as members of his administration and family handling this classified material, especially after he left the presidency. as you know, he has serious ties with foreign governments. oftentimes those

that is known as tss i. this is related to the most sensitive national security secrets that the united states house in terms of the intelligence collection systems. whether they be technical or otherwise. and there are very strict handling and storage requirements for all tedious of cia material and documents. usually in government facilities with 24/7 arm garments and alarm systems. so, it is wanting to make sure that in order to prevent any type of compromise to this information that could help our adversaries and heard a national security, there are very sharp restrictions in terms of who can handle it and where it can be stored. and clearly, the fact that it was at mar-a-lago which is not a secure facility, raises serious questions about who might have access this information and what the damage might have been to u.s. national security. >> thank you for breaking that down, mister director. right before the show, nbc news reported that the heads of the house oversight intelligence committees are now ask

many of them were classified, this is been reported previously, this isn't a small crime as a former tss sihai security clearance holder, something that's topsecret consider to be pose a grave national security list if it's in the wrong hands. mar-a-lago, as was previously reported as been a target of spies, espionage you cannot just take highly classified documents, and keep them in your personal office. that's a very serious offense. you don't even, and the final thing i would say, maybe donald trump's had the kind of things he would want to preserve, i couldn't even begin to speculate what kind of classified documents that could pose a serious risk to the u.s. if they got out. >> maggie, only talked about the potential that they're, there is nothing there, 15 boxes as you set someone may have pointed to where this was. what they think may have been there. we know from your reporting, some things have been destroyed. how do we know a bunch of stuff hasn't been destroyed? >> that's what that all comes down to basically, everybody keeps saying around trump, why is everybody assuming the.

most important was the -- least 11 boxes of -- including one set labeled tss ei. you see security level clearance has a number of stages. it can range from classified to secret, to the highest level. to the highest level, ts take a look, you can see on this since the classified document, from the john f. kennedy administration, that is labeled right there, at the top of the page. additionally, some top secrets documents can also be classified as sci, or sensitive compartmented information. these documents are said secret they can only be stored in special facilities, feud with permission. they are not supposed to be stored in the basement of a golf resort. but that appears to be what donald trump did. we do not know with the top secret sci documents pertain to. but we do know, according to reporting in the washington post, that the fbi was seeking documents related to nuclear weapons. and the new york times reports that the search focused on so-called special access programs. as democratic congressman ruben guy go shared with the house committee on intelligence pu

if the guy comes along y ldshuppo sup tss cda s th is efddhing tt n pns pvansniylva c b be ankful hethemp t endorsem ik hhel th y yt is yoror in will it work in the general. will it endure the trump endorsement and succeed in november with trump's support. elizabeth: the thing is, trump's impact, republican insiders fear they could lose the senate because they may seem good in the primary but maybe not in a general election. you're talking too much about the past, about vote fraud. about election stuff and what is your policies going forward. they feel it might be too toxic, you know what i mean? that is the store, senate picks in arizona, georgia, ohio, pennsylvania, not ready for prime time yet for the senate. what do you think? >> well i think it is reminder anyone who is running for public office and wants to succeed has the obligation speak to issues that matter to voters here and now. that includes the disaster of economy you're covering so well. gas prices being what they are. making it so people can go back to living a life that isn't paycheck to paycheck. that is number one.

among that batch was 11 more sets of classified documents, including some that were marked tss sihai ts sci a type of document that can only be viewed in a secure location. can't take over according to vice, and can't take a camera in -- the former president will in fact be prosecuted. here is what andrew weissmann, who worked in the justice department for more than two decades and previously served as the general counsel for the fbi told my colleague, nicole wallace, dennis last night. >> when i read this today, my big, overarching take is -- and i know this is just a prediction and speculation -- but i would say it's an educated one. it's that the former president is going to be prosecuted. what we are seeing is so much worse, both in terms of the volume, the length of time, and event in the sort of repeated obstruction and false statements that were made. i don't see, if you are somebody like merrick garland, who is a former judge, who thinks about precedent, about treating like defendants equally, i don't see how you avoid that conclusion in this case. >> joining me now is barbar

e obtained tss i obtained these documents as part of the lawsuit.i'm going to have more documents released soon. t buthi i think what i've already shown is enough that this case will survive a motion to dismiss and we'll get to discovery and depositions and people insidere w and outsie the white house are going to face some very uncomfortable questions, probably not just b about me, but about other people who've been de platformed in the last year or twoth by twitter at the behet of politicians that i'm suggesting. yeah, at the of the federal government. i mean, what happened last year and you know, i was on with you many times.wa we talked about how the vaccines weren't working very well. it became clear over the summerw that the federal government is going to push forel mandates. they're going to push for boosters. those are unpopular stepsda boo and it's sort of an admission that the vaccines weren't working that well, that is a real problem for the federal government. they didn't like me, a and they didn't like other skeptics and twitter and fac

but if for instance i had walked out of my office with tss, ci information which we're being told what was recovered in the execution of this search warrant, it is clear that if i had refused to turn it over or tried to keep it hidden saver a request was made, i would be immediately substantial to prosecution. the possible distinction here and i've heard some of our friends say on air today, and this is true, is that the government bears a burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal prosecution. so if trump came forward and said well i de classified this, it is tough to prove a criminal case beyond a reasonable doubt. but that is not how it would work. trump, in order to raise that defense, if he were to be prosecuted and obviously that is not where we are, there are a lot of steps in between executing a search warrant and bringing an indictment. but if that were to happen, before he would be able to raise this defense that he declassified these materials, he would have to come forward with a threshold burden of showing that was true, of showing these materials were properl