jonathan turley on the hillary clinton bombshell and andy pudzer whether or not the u.s.s it in fact inevitable. all that and more coming up. before treating your chronic migraine— 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting 4 hours or more you're not the only one with questions about botox®. botox® prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine before they even start—with about 10 minutes of treatment once every 3 months. so, ask your doctor if botox® is right for you, and if a sample is available. effects of botox® may spread hours to weeks after injection causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away, as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition. side effects may include allergic reactions, neck and injection site pain, fatigue, and headache. don't receive botox® if there's a skin infection. tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, and medications, including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. in a survey, 92% o

jonathan turley, thank you so much for your reaction. thank you.ederal grand jury indicted frank james, the man suspected of shooting multiple people on a subway train in brooklyn last month. he now faces terrorism and gun violence charges. he's accused of setting off smoke grenades and firing a gun on a crowded train april 12, wounding ten people and injuring several others. life behind bars if convicted. his arraignment on the federal charges have not yet been scheduled. it two days until russia celebrates victory day. we will tell you what the kremlin hopes to accomplish by then. eastern and southern ukraine, how will america respond? will take it up with military analyst and fox news contributor coming up next. ♪♪ hello cashback! hello, kevin hart! earn big time with chase freedom unlimited with no annual fee. how do you cashback? chase. make more of what's yours. ♪("i've been everywhere" by johnny cash) ♪ ♪i've traveled every road in this here land!♪ ♪i've been everywhere, man.♪ ♪i've been everywhere, man.♪ ♪of travel i've had my share, man.♪

hearing more from jonathan turley, coming up in just a bit. a couple of interesting articles out over the weekend and a lot to say, john. >> john: looking forward to hearing from him. >> and president putin, ukraine says russia fired four missiles at odesa and dropped a bomb on a ukrainian school in the east that was sheltering 90 people. dr. rebecca grant joins us for more on this. but begin with trey yingst on the ground in kyiv. what else did putin have to say during the parade today? >> anita, good afternoon. president putin spoke in moscow but made no major announcements about the war in ukraine. remarks came at the annual victory day celebration that included a parade through moscow's red square to mark the world war ii surrender of nazi germany. troops marching and military equipment, he made no declaration of victory and no broader mobilization of forces. he did accuse ukraine without evidence of planning to retake crimea and threatening nuclear war, adding this. >> fighting for the homeland, for its future, so that no one forgets the

but if you kind of stolen my thunder and so is professor turley. i mean i gotfe.this heardha this notion that there was a leaked draft opinion and i'mtt wayly care which the opinion went. i thought to myself i can't use all the words that came upp in first. but i'll just tell you this is an outrageous historic moment to have a leak out of the supreme court, a trial balloon a or a warning shot, whatever you want to characterize it as . and i have two things t that lep to mind. one is what is one of the associate justices was involved in the leak. i mean, that magnifies an already historic, horrific moment into somethingc beyond belief and maybe as a as a possible way of deflecting from that concept. deflecting that. this supreme court needs to speak as one tonight or tomorrow morning and issue a statement that condemns the living out of what just happened. i don't care change. i take your point. p i want all of you to chime in here. to me it seems like the court needs to come out like an hour h agoou and immediately the chief justice should come out and issue a sta

jonathan turley. oh, i had never seen a picture of her until i got on ancestry. past. my great aunt signed up to serve in the union army as a field nurse. my great grandmother started a legacy of education in my family. didn't know she ran for state office. ended up opening her own restaurant in san francisco. paralee wharton elder, lupe gonzalez, mary sawyers, margaret ross. there's a lot of life that she lived. who are the strong women in your family? (vo) verizon business unlimited is going ultra! get more. like manny. event planning with our best plan ever. (manny) yeah, that's what i do. (vo) with 5g ultra wideband in many more cities, you get up to 10 times the speed at no extra cost. verizon is going ultra, so your business can get more. your spirit is stronger than your highs and lows. your creativity can outshine any bad day. because you are greater than your bipolar i, and you can help take control of your symptoms - and ask about vraylar. some medicines only treat the lows or highs. once-daily vraylar is proven to treat depressive, acute manic, and mix

professor turley, the big papers, the washington post, the "new york times," they've all but ignoredhe violated the 11th commandment among democrats, thou shalt not name the clintons in a scandal. i mean that has long been the view in washington. and the clintons have been very adept while associates have gone to jail, they have tended to avoid personal accountability for years. and now you really have one of the final pieces falling into place, that the clinton campaign we know was behind the steel dossier -- steele dossier, even though that was denied earlier. we know they were behind the [inaudible] scandal. this was overall the most extensive disinformation campaign and arguably the most successful in american political history. but it's virtual crickets in washington. people were shocked when her name was mentioned because that's just not done. >> jon: where does it go from here? this is all coming out as a result of durham's investigation. what's the next shoe to drop? any ideas? >> that's a good question. you know, durham first has to rye to bring in a conviction here. -- try

i'm sorry, did i -- i call you jonathan turley or jonathan attorney.an: either one works. >> john: you wrote about the make-up on the jury. i take it you are not surprised by the verdict. >> jonathan: no, a number of us indicated you could not have a more favorable jury composition. it's hard to argue against that. three clinton donors, a.o.c. donor, at least one juror that seemed to struggle with the question of impartiality, and a juror with a daughter on the sports team with the daughter of the defendant. this is d.c., 90% of the jury pool voted for hillary clinton. and jurors, to be fair, often do overcome any personal hesitation, bias, pressure from the outside. but what made this case particularly curious is the rulings of the court. you know, the difference between this and the flynn trial is like night and day, in the flynn trial the judge virtually joined the prosecution team and actually used the flag in the courtroom as a prop to condemn flynn. in this case the prosecution was really faced with a series of obstacles where the court limited t

jonathan turley, thank you so much for joiningg us tonight on "hannity". butwhile the media has all ignoring this dustmen trial, ov they are suddenly interested in covering hunter biden and they call it russian disinformation. joe concha and rachel they campi duffy will joins us next with reaction. stay with us. keep life zesty. zantac 360 degrees heartburn can't stop this party because in fact 360 triple vaccine prevents release and less working in as little as 15 minutes. devolites death with zantac 360. why are so many people turning to super rich bristol? because it would be bristol give you the energy and blood pressure support you want from real life without the super villain and i swear by it, it gives me more healthy energy to keep up with my head to ketanji and was inspired by the nobel prize winning discovery. nitric oxide is a blood vessel signaling supervene black cherry flavored crystal to unlock the nitric oxide boosting repeat nutrients to help widen your blood vessels supporting healthy blood flow so your body can produce energy more effici

shannon bream as was jonathan turley.rino and leo terrell all esteemed legal minds will be coming your way. >> ainsley: talking about the election seasonal kicking into high gear today both ohio and indiana. the first in a packed month primary giving huge insight is into where the parties stand heading into the midterms. >> steve: less than hour the state of ohio and will head to the polls most of the contentious and closely watched senate primaries in the nation today in ohio. it's election day. >> brian: what do the voters think and what are they thinking? pete hegseth is live at jc's restaurant? burton, ohio. boy, it's packed. it sounds like it's loud. >> pete: it is, guys. the supreme court news you are talking about right now. that's what everyone is talking about. you guys are talking about it for sure. guys, it's election season. it's primary morning. here we are again 2022 and ohio is going to be a huge indicator amongst republicans which way they have got to go. i have been talking to folks this morning i have he

is brave and possibly put their career on the line and you saw conservative reaction from jonathan turleythy, this is going to be big, there are barricades put around the supreme court when this story comes out and november midterms looking like red tsunami coming in the house. for the first time, democrats are energized, but so are republicans. look at gallup, the past 10 years basically abortion has been even between pro life and pro choice, evenly split down the country. it is split down the middle, carley. >> carley: i agree, we will be seeing protests in courthouses across the country and be following those images as they come in the days to come. thafrj -- thank you for joining us. turn to this, being criticized for tone deaf celebration at this year's met gala. joke politics at play with flashy fashion being used for political statement. jackie ibanez is here. >> jackie: good morning. average americans pinch pennys to pay for rising price of living, hollywood's elite celebrating last night's met gala with the theme, guilded age. the guilded era marked time when the rich became mega

jonathan turley is here with analysis. we begin at the supreme court where david spunt is standing by. >> good morning. if you think the shock waves are strong across the country and across the world. think about what's going on in this building with the nine supreme court justices. this is a close knit group. they may not agree on every opinion but at the end of the day they're in an elite group. nine supreme court justices and questions about trust and which justice the leaker or the leakers work for. those are all questions. a lot of emotion last night after this story was released around 9:00 as bill said. many came out to the supreme court and protested until the early hours of this morning. some upset, some happy. many just looking for some answers. as for right now there has been a steady stream of people who have come out early this morning and largely peaceful. no issues. but you are seeing two different sides of this specific issue right now outside of the supreme court. i want to pull out two parts of this draft

here now with more is george washington law professor jonathan turley great thank you so much for joiningprofessor , you have written about this, i really appreciate your comments on this, but what is it, three of the jurors are actually clinton donors? why are they sitting in the jur pool? >> it's a bizarre twist, but when we gary guarantee you jury of your peers, we don't meet if you are a clinton person you will be tried by other clinton people. you feel like john durham might take away the lessons that that is the case in dc. 90 percent of people voted for hillary clinton in dc. so the jury pool is going to be naturally heavily weighted in that direction pride there's a difference between a supporter in a donor. we have three people that indicated they are clinton donors. we also have another person who said that she is a donor to aoc and had to be sort of probed an prodded i should say to say tha she was going to be actually impartial. these people very well could be impartial and fair. certainly clinton's porters can be fair and impartial jurors. it when you have donors on the jurie

and they should be working to protect the integrity of the court, and as jonathan turley said, this does damage, i hope it is not irreprable damage, i hope this person is dealt with, it is imperative we protect the integrity of the court so they can move forward with these decisions. but the democrats, look, leaks, they have leaks all over the place. and usually it has to do with legislation. when i chaired the select committee on infant lives, when i was in the house, we had somebody on the democrat side that leaked everything before we ever had a hearing, and they tried to coach the witnesses. the democrats are known for doing this. we have seen it in some of these judicial hearings. what you need to know is that if you are sitting, if you are an associate justice on the supreme court you can have the conversations whether in person or written, in confidentiality, and that you are not going to have a political activist who is going to go run to their cheerleader in the media and say put this activist needs to be removed from the court and this should be an object lesson for everyone as

constitutional law attorney jonathan turley calls it a friends with benefits situation arguing the trial is a black eye for the f.b.i. the trial confirmed what many have long alleged about how top officials eagerly accepted any russia collusion claim involving former president trump's 2016 campaign. special counsel john durham's investigation is an indictment of department and bureau that once again appeared willfully blind as they were played by hillary clinton's campaign. >> i think professor turley is getting at the point we talked about before. how did the f.b.i. not know? sussman mails jim baker. the email didn't say mr. baker. he said jim. how did they know it wasn't coming from the clinton campaign. he knew sussman was the campaign lawyer for the clinton campaign. when we deposed jim comey in 2018 he told us in the transcribed interview that up until the point he got fired, which had been 10 months of this russia investigation, up until that point he said we didn't know if we had anything. we still didn't know if we had anything. that tells you from the get go that this was balone

. >> john: plus we have jonathan turley standing by.of the jurors already. so, how does he think deliberations will go? that's just ahead. more protection, more sun, more joy. neutrogena® beach defense® the suncare brand used most by dermatologists and their families, neutrogena® for people with skin. ubrelvy helps u fight migraine attacks. u put it all on the line. u do it all. so u bring ubrelvy. it can quickly stop migraine in its tracks within 2 hours... without worrying if it's too late or where you are. unlike older medicines, ubrelvy is a pill that directly blocks a protein believed to be a cause of migraine. do not take with strong cyp3a4 inhibitors. most common side effects were nausea and tiredness. migraine pain relief starts with u. learn how abbvie can help you save. ask about ubrelvy, the anytime, anywhere migraine medicine. out here, you're more than just a landowner. ask about ubrelvy, the anytime, you're a gardener. a landscaper. a hunter. because you didn't settle for ordinary. same goes for your equipment. versatile,

jonathan turley as always. thank you. >> thank you. >> bret: we are following all of this.p next, picking up the pieces in ukraine following russian troop occupation. we will have a live report from kharkiv. i speak with the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff mark tilly about taiwan and china's military power. >> we are ready to fight in a future war and prevail in a future war against whatever comes our way whether it's chinese, russians or anything else. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ finding the perfect project manager isn't easy. but, at upwork, we found him. he's in adelaide between his color-coordinated sticky note collection and the cutest boxed lunch we have ever seen. and you can find him right now on upwork.com when the world is your workforce, finding the perfect project manager, designer, developer, or whomever you may need... tends to fall right into place. find top-rated talent who can start today on upwork.com right now, we're all feelin' the squeeze. we're having to get creative. find a new way. but birthdays still happen. fridays still call for s'mores. you have to make magi

law professor jonathan turley writing "it's hard not to view this as a malicious act."went on to call it a breach of the most fundamental obligations and traditions of the court. the greatest crisis. chief justice roberts' face on the court in your tonight as you point out, politico is reporting exclusively that the supreme court has voted to strike down the landmark roe v. wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by justice samuel alito circulated inside the court. according to politico, the draft opinion is a full started repudiation of the 1973 1973 decision. subsequent 1992 decision planned parenthood v casey that largely maintain that right. in the draft opinion there are a few quotes from justice alito. among them, roe was egregiously wrong from the start. we hold that roe and casey must be overruled and it's time to heed the constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elect representatives, i.e. backed out of the states." reaction from both sides of the aisle. swift and predictable. >> i found it astonishing and appa

jonathan turley calling it a malicious attack on the court saying it is an egregious act. mcconnell calling the leak shocking to have this come from our highest court. should the president address that specifically and be announcing investigations into how this could happen? >> well, he clearly wasn't willing to go that far in the comments that we heard. but if these democrats think this is so shocking and appalling and a concern for the future integrity of the court, which i would agree with, they need to look to their leftist activists and tell them to knock it off. by all points this is where this might come from. we've seen them try to take these actions to heavily politicize these. the kevin's point trying to move on to the process point of the leak to the ramification. one thing i thought was shocking in the president's comments he pointed out and underscored how far the democrat party has gone to the left on the issue of abortion. joe biden himself when he was a senator in 1982 voted in support of an amendment that would have given states the right to overturn roe v

let's bring in george washington university law school professor jonathan turley.onathan, thanks for being here tonight. >> thank you. >> bret: i want to get your thoughts on this case. you know, there may not be a lot of people other places that are following it we are following it closely from the beginning. today this testimony was pretty interesting. and, it goes to the bigger picture, i think, that john durham is trying to set here about the narrative of what was happening inside the clinton campaign, including hillary clinton herself. >> yeah. what was particularly interesting, is durham has wanted to have a broader scope for this trial to bring in more information about the campaign. and the judge cooper in this case has really shut him down. and limited the evidence, limited the scope of his questions. and then all of a sudden, leukemia dropped the name of names. i mean, hillary clinton has always had a sort of volt mort status of who who must not be named in a scandal. clintons have really been able to avoid direct responsibility here was campaign manager

so i went ahead with professor jonathan turley, as he said earlier today this is the worst jury for a prosecutor he has ever seen in his life and the professor is correct. this is a jury that is stacked h with hillary clinton supportersl ,three hillary clinton donors, a problem ises,, there really are no republicans in washington, d.c. from which the jury is drawn. you'd have a better chance of spotting a unicorn than a republican in washington, d.c. and so, you know, the defendant is hoping they will acquit him simply because he hates donald trump and they do too.e well, you know, we're going to find that out. cinating lena, you've got a fascinating client. you've got a manve who'ss the target of everyone because he threatens the status quo and this kind of absurdity that has been we've been drowning in now for generationsr . there's one guy for who is sayig enough is enough and it is a threat because of i the impact of simply calling it out. but we do have and americans are noticing this that therems two systems of justice, that it seems to be in fact rigged against president trump,

jonathan turley with much more to say in just moments. >> anita: but first, team coverage, outside of doocy live at the white house with more on all of this. >> peter: good afternoon, anita. aboard air force one jen psaki plainly stated that white house officials hope the final row v. wade opinion does not look like the one that was leaked. and that means that white house officials share a goal with pro abortion activists. >> do you think the progressive activists that are now planning protests outside some of the justice's houses are extreme? >> peaceful protest, no. peaceful protest is not extreme. >> activists posted a map with the home addresses of the supreme court justices. is that the kind of thing this president wants to help your side make their point? >> look, i think the president's view is there is a lot of passion, a lot of fear, a lot of sadness from many, many people across this country about what they saw in that leaked document. we obviously want people's privacy to be respected. >> peter: the u.s. code, 1507, clear explanation. it's illegal to picket or parade in or

as the don't meet the necessary democratic standards in an alto zara exclusive or latin america as turley, st. newman got reaction from cuba, deputy foreign minister as the name implies, the summit of the americas is the only venue we're leaders of north central and south america. gathered to confront pressing problems. this year the theme is migration, but the host president joe biden has unilaterally decided to exclude 3 countries, including cuba, iowa, thank you. thank you for. i met cooper's deputy foreign minister, godless fernando, the ga seal, have vanished point man for us affairs, to talk about the implications of washington's controversial decision. or we have said that a saw me that excludes some countries of the region. it's an exclusive summit, but if you're going to have the summit, you're going to spend money on it. if you're going to go to the trouble of convening, heads of state and government, it would be to discuss the difficult problems that we have in our region, which are difficult. some of them are controversial and for the summer to be successful. the useful thing

because this culture war and i agree with steve turley, ah, it's are global war. the meeting brings together ultra conservatives and christian, fundamentalists all celebrating the traditional family freight for the natural family. pray for our families. trust, god drives the divine providence. it is in god as branches in many european union nations, representatives work to establish political contacts wherever they can. the world congress on families is the big networking event. at the meeting, journalist ramsey got a chance to talk with citizen, go boss. as who aga, he recorded the conversation on his phone. no, been going through, we would launch a campaign and a couple of countries where we want to make an impact. probably those countries where you have anti globalist, you know, people who don't like the european union parties that don't want the european union to get international issues. and at the same time, parties that are closer to us in terms of family life. so let's say in poland, hungary, italy, you know, maybe in germany too. and in spain, even smalle

no, i'm afraid of my answer. features kalach dough for kalach literally turley alexey play bread fornova the baker and many varieties of bread he depicted in watercolors from the rus series, russian types in the hungry 1920. this is the correct answer. cheeks give out cheeks, he has no thin people. in the second half of the 19th century, this merchant's bread was famous both in moscow and st. petersburg, and he explained that flour is all power. i have purchased flour, i don’t have all my own. the second half of the century filippov ivan filippov laws. the rules for the free distribution of bread and the last question of the round, this is exactly what bread in communion symbolizes for christians. the body of christ right let's sum up the third round 6 700 for arseniy 12.3 stupas for sergey 3900 for alexey ahead of the final 1991 moscow found earlier a girl in a strange apartment in a wedding dress that does not even remember her name there was such an assumption that she knew or guessed about the one who committed this crime, who hunts for the unfortunate bride, a mysterious state o

let's bring in jonathan turley, thanks for being here.amala harris yesterday, who made remarks in buffalo very specifically about how she wants to institute an assault weapons ban. take a listen. >> have an assault weapons ban, you know what an assault weapon is, you know how an assault weapon was designed, it was designed for a specific purpose, to kill a lot of human beings quickly. an assault weapon is a weapon of war, with no place, no place in a civil society. >> jonathan, we had an assault weapons ban 1994 to 2004. how likely would an assault weapons ban, how likely would it about he to hold in the courts, jonathan? >> i think that the odds are against it being upheld. the earlier ban occurred before the supreme court came down with the heller decision saying the second amendment really bestows an individual right in terms of gun rights for citizens. there have been bans on ar-15 models that have been brought to court. they have had a tough time. that litigation is still going. there's a lot of misinformation about how this would pl

jonathan turley has some answers today. >> sandra: and another fox news alert, the economy in this

her oil cause her world with the ideal her lift her lover mackey of was ether a li the holly oak turley yeah, and if off of anything ah ah ah nevada, the deacon for that i can't moulder the stood you had got my dormer to mom and i'm hammered. muscle ton clean it up and it said get her the hill or when the air feel is the new bus mobile and i still don't pull. you has this you will see for figure had enough. so i'll have you heard would now the surely it it early mccann in the country, the confederacy and kill them on the other 2, behaving or mum look at the body physic. infect that accounting evidence. did you have a quote for our girlfriend and wow hm. and her the year or solo. hm. but do some oh mama find them and what is the, what are the and no god, one figure little more think of a lacking or it is either monitor. now if you don't combine bill or fuck up will by then. so you have a mother thought the nfl sulfur wavelength road fuck up the one was to get back to him. i thought we had heard the hill or near she jamalia muffler be feminine, a sub by look up in my leave, in a one marke

fox news contributor jonathan turley is here with us with his take.untability outside the private homes of justices. jonathan, you have watched the court for decades. what do you make of this? >> i never thought we would get to this point that the white house cannot even muster the courage to denounce this type of harassment of judges or justices and their families. i mean, how did we get to this point? people have become addicted to rage. this is entirely gratuitous. it's not going to make any change on the court. it's not going to result in any alteration of the opinion. if anything, justices will feel that they have to stand their ground with even greater certainty. so this is just gratuitous. this is part of our age of rage. and the president of the united states cannot even step forward and say, wait, yes, you have a right to protest but there is limits. there is questions of decency. i don't understand why that is such challenge for this white house. >> pete: to include points out the fact that drafts of supreme court opinions should not be leak

. >> the law professor john turley said a few hours ago on fox news we are living in the age of rage. right now there is security outside the homes of several supreme court justices after a group announced plans to protest outside of those justices. late wednesday night authorities put up tall barricades outside the supreme court. the same barricades used following the january 6th attack on the capitol. the court does not security a source tells us it is precautionary to the breach of the building. the activist group calls ruth sent us is posting online the home addresses of the six conservative justices encouraging people to walk by and demonstrate this coming week. this group is not calling for any violent protests specifically but going to private homes does raise questions. the group posted our 6 to 3 extremist supreme court ruling they hurt women, minorities and immigrant rights. we must rise up to force accountability using a diversity of tactics. >> i think our view here is that peaceful protests, a long history in the united states and country of that. we certainly encourage p

i agree with professor jonathan turley as he said earlier today. worst jury for a prosecutor he has ever seen in his life. on the professor is correct. this is a jury that is stocked with hillary clinton supporters, three hillary clinton donors, for god sake. the problem is there's no republicans in washington, d.c., from which the jury is drawn. you would have a better chance of spotting a unicorn than a republican in washington, d.c. the defendant is hoping they will acquit him simply because he hates donald trump and they do too. >> we are going to find that out. you've got a fascinating clients come eve got a man who is the talkative everyone because because he threatens the status quo and this kind of absurdity that we've been drowning in for generations. because of the impact of calling it out. it seems to be raked against president trump. does he realize, i'm sure he does, this proves his point and his arguments it's because he's being correct? >> he not only grasps it, he's been saying it from before he was even elected as president. the ma

. >> kayleigh: i would just say jonathan turley pointed this out and he has a great point.disinformation in the last few months, it's the border-whipping incident rails border patrol agents were accused of whipping migrants. you have folks like ayanna pressley who called it white's premises behavior, maxine waters, worse than what we witnessed during slavery, and they were met with our nation's horrors. and others silence in the white house. maybe instead of singing you could start with that whipping incident. >> emily: kamala harris weighed in, too, and they disbanded that units. so another underfunding and weakening of the support we have on that southern border that we so desperately need that continues getting eroded. up next, new reporting that there is more trouble between president biden and rice president kamala harris after harris left him hanging on a key issue. why can't they just get along? ♪ ♪ if you own a home and need cash, call newday usa. why? home values are at all-time highs. use your va benefit now to turn the equity in your home into cash in your hand.

the law professor jonathan turley today said we are living in the age of rage. right now law enforcement members are watching closely to homes of the six conservative justices on the court. a group called ruth sent us, a nod to ruth bader ginsberg, members of that group posting the home addresses of those six conservative justices encouraging people to walk by and demonstrate. jen psaki on the job just one more week asked yet again today if the president and white house is okay with demonstrators going to the homes of supreme court justices to protest. here she is earlier on air force one this afternoon. >> the president believes in peaceful protest. he believes that's part of our democracy and part of our history but respects and understands the independence of the third branch of the government. >> make not an example of a peaceful protest. these supporters right now on the screen stood in front of justice sam alito's home thanking for his stance in the draft opinion. two senators, democrat chris coons from delaware and john cornyn of texas came together to in

responsible for hiring fusion gps for its smear operation come and get this, our very own jonathan turley testified he would not have approved going to the fbi with the bogus alpha bank claim, but the story does not add up because clinton operatives had no problem pushing the fake steele dossier to the fbi, which was then used it to get the application warrants through without the fisa application, no warrant, that was to get at carter page, backdoor all things things trump world. we are also learning during jury selection this week the judge allowed hillary clinton and aoc donors into the jury pool, raising even more questions about the jury's impartiality. this would be a great miss character justice, potentially taint a jury with built-in biases, diehard clinton and aoc supporters, or even trump supporters, for that matter. no, they would not have any business being on the jury in this case. here with the reaction from a former chief of staff mark meadows, along with former chairman of the house intel committee, by the way, now the ceo of truth social, that is donald trump social media

joining me now, jonathan turley, gw university law professor and fox news contributor. civil rights attorney and ceo for the center for american liberty is. we also hope to be joined by former doj lawyer and just moments. professor, i am -- this is one of those things i thought i would never see in my life. i've seen a lot in my time in washington. i've been here way too long. this is one of the most destructive things that i could ever imagine to happen to our legal system. take it away. >> we are all in disbelief. i've covered the court for years and i teach a class on the supreme court. i really didn't think this day would come. that is a strange thing to say in the city that literally floats on leaks. the only island not see that did not have leaks was the supreme court. and it existed on a level of integrity that is all too foreign today in politics. and to see people celebrating this leak is perhaps the most disturbing thing of all. it just seems that there is no ruler institutional value that can withstand this age of rage. what happened with this leak caused las

we talk to the erie county sheriff and jonathan turley about that.a crisis? congressman kathy mcmorris rodgers will be here, and if you don't like the price of gasoline now, just wait. charles payne on inflation nation coming up. i'm john roberts. senator is off today. jacqui heinrich joins me for "america reports." ♪ ♪ >> emily: we may finally be getting some answers from congress on ufos. tomorrow a house panel will hold a public hearing on what the pentagon now calls "unidentified aerial phenomenon." it'll be the first such hearing on capitol hill in more than 50 years and it comes nearly a year after a report requested by lawmakers reviewed 144 sightings of aircraft or other devices from 2004-2021. aircraft or whatever they wear that appeared to be moving at incredible speeds or trajectories. pete, obviously defense officials have come out and said these are likely just develop technologies from other countries. however, they have not ruled out other >> pete: and mostly going to do for my time back to you. [laughter] i am yet to see a high resolu

>> this is part of that concept that jonathan turley has been talking about.t like the results of something, get violent. granted, you said in your introduction that the protest looks thus far according to fox have not been violent. it's this notion of rise up, create this mob rule that you're seeing and when somebody like chuck schumer basically does a veiled threat against justices and again, he wasn't specifically threatening. it was a veiled threat. >> harris: we saw this with maxine watters in the house, right, after the murder of george floyd. get up in their faces! i mean, we've seen this. and it's not ok! and you say well, fox has only seen peaceful. yes, that's what our cameras have seen. well, that molotov cocktail was not peaceful. just because we weren't standing there and only saw the aftermath. >> it's part of this overall concept that the end justifies a means. that's not how a civilized society works. we have laws in place to prevent what we are seeing yet this is -- >> harris: what is the end that they want? you know they want to mandate behav

like a jay sekulow had gone to the fb b and pitched a story that was completely farcical, jonathan turleyccessful disinformation campaign in modern political history. abc, cbs, in, bc, cnn, other networks don't cover it? that dog don't hunt, jackie. [laughter] >> yeah. and speak of the coverage to this and the hunter biden laptop story, dan bongino had this to stay. listen. >> we have the receipt, here it is, for hunter biden's laptop, signed by hunter biden, billed to hunter biden with hunter biden's phone number, dropped off with -- by hunter biden with hunter biden's e-mails, confirmed by hunter biden's partner. if you're a media person, i mean, honestly, how do you look the next generation in the face and say, hey, you know what? we're a constitutionally-protected entity supposed to safeguard democracy, and here's what we did. >> don't forget to watch "unfiltered" tonight at 9 p.m. eastern time. david, your reaction to that. >> the american people are catching on to the media, and they have caught on. but then they're a taking the next step. they're tuning out, they're turning them of

jonathan turley was on. the fbi will come in and question every clerk and ask them did you leak it? at that point, there's debate over whether leaking it is a crime but saying no would be a crime. the leaker is going to have to make a decision do i lie to the fbi and commit a crime to cover up what i did or do i admit it and own it and now i get disbarred and publicly shamed for this breach of supreme court precedence. >> martha: chief justice roberts said it's in the hands of the marshal of the court. mike leak says he believes the court already has a good idea where this came from and i would point out there's some reports that the white house was aware of this story over the past few days. so it seems highly unlikely that they would be aware of it if it had been leaked from the conservative sides, which some people have suggested. >> i don't think the conservatives were leaking this. conservatives are ready -- for the conservative side, this is great news. we want to make sure that they got it done rather than put it out there. there's no benefit. there's no benefit from leaking

and get this , our very own jonathan turley points out elíasel reportedly testified he would not haveapproved going to the fbi with the bogusb alpha bank claim, but the storyd doesn't add up because clinton operatives had no problem pushing the fake steele f dossir to the fbi, whichh was then usd to get the fisa application warrants through without fisa application, no warrant and that was to get at carter page back to all things trump world. we're also learning that during jury selection earlierur this week, the judge allowed hillary clinton and aoc donorsen into the jury pool raising even more questions about the jury's impartiality. this would be a graveth miscarriageis of justice, potentially tainted jury with built in biases die hard clinton and aoki supporters or even trump supporters for that matter. no, they wouldn't have any business being on the juryry in this case. and with reaction, former whiteo house chief of staff markrm meadows, along with former chairman of the house intel committee by the now the ceo of truth social that's donald trumpis social media platform, by the

fox news contributor jonathan turley joins us on what we can expect.that seem fair to you can those three people who donated to her campaign be fair? >> the special counsel objected to particularly one of these jurors as being biased. and judge cooper overruled that this is the latest of a series of decisions by the court that has in some ways debilitated aspects of the prosecution. you know, the court previously ruled that durham could not make critical link cams to the clinton campaign during the trial and durham's people were i think incredulous, hold it, the reason we are saying that he hid his connections to the clinton campaign was that this was part of an overall effort to do so. the other attorney in this firm mark elliott the general counsel of the clinton campaign was also accused of lying about the clinton campaign funding the steele dossier. this deals with a separate russian collusion theory regarding the alpha bank. both of these individuals were accused of similar conduct and the campaign was accused of just concealing its role in spread

let's ask fox news contributor jonathan turley.ould like to. however, is it legal? we talk about something like this, created or adaptation of it created within dhs, can they do that? >> well they can create advisory committee, they can create bodies, they have a lot of flexibility in that sense. at the outset it is not something clearly unlawful, but how they describe this board raises serious constitutional questions. i mean the white house said that jankowicz is going to prevent disinformation from spreading around the globe. well how do you do that? you don't do that by singing at it. are you going to actually try to control speech? are you going to have any powers to sanction? will you have the be ability to try to coerce social media to take things off? that can cross the line. you're seeing a lot of democrats moving towards good old-fashioned censorship. i mean after musk said, said that he would take over twitter and reintroduce free speech values, a lot of democrats went back to the old playbook. barack obama said we need

real question, jonathan turley goes, this has been or will, you never go after hillary or the clintonsthere is a general rule in washington, thou shot not name hillary clinton in a scandal if you are a democrat and this really violated the commandment in dc, this was raised to her. durham has documented the researchers who put together this material said they didn't think it would stand up to scrutiny, hillary was reportedly told we don't have anything clear here and she greenlighted it, they got the friendly media to run it and they responded they had nothing to do with it. >> this was a plot to create an october surprise, not just for the fbi but also peddled to the cia although the charges don't include the cia, just the allegations with the fbi. it has huge implications. he is a young guy, maybe she is old and she did it, i got the rest of my life ahead of me so maybe this rule the jonathan turley says is broken, i think this case is so important because the implications for anyone who decides to run on that level again the way donald trump did and take on the establishment to thin

here to break it all down is fox news contributor george washington lawyer jonathan turley. yesterday as michael sussmann talked to jim baker one day after talking to marc elias? >> well, this was a real pile on, brian. you had really damning evidence from marc elias the former clinton campaign general counsel and then jim baker the former fbi general counsel. baker left no doubt. he said that sussmann came in and did not say that he was representing the clinton campaign. in fact, before the meeting, he sent a text that expressly said i'm not representing anyone. i'm here to bring you some really important and damaging information. >> brian: what's crazy is that they are supposedly friends. and sussmann not only was working for clinton, he billed for the hour. so let's just use logic. if baker and sussmann know each other. you have to know what sussmann does for a living representing the clinton camp so he could put that together. what is significant is and you stop me if i'm wrong, john that because he came in as himself they keep his identity secret. so when he -- when bak