well, for example, poetry should be used accurately enough, there is no need to change anything, as tychynas applies first of all, artem pivovarova of his track together with nastya kamenskikh in this up-and-coming sea quite a long way ago, quite a lot of ukrainian musicians, they not only switched to ukrainian and started writing ukrainian songs, they also say that we all do not want to sing in russian at all and want to translate our former hits in the ukrainian language, but to perform them at concerts, and maybe some albums where our old songs will be known for a long time, but only in the ukrainian language. they have, for example, among them olga polyakova, who translated the queen of the night is already performed at concerts by girls from ukraine, we sing the tears of tears, i will become beautiful and today i will be happy i saw today i will definitely not waste my beauty, i will not cry again, you are now free you are free to go anywhere goodbye well, and also definitely the quest of the pistols, who translated one of their most famous songs and what did you sound like in russian,

poem protopolyu said that everything is wrong there, that tychyna's text does not match the text int at all well, you have to do it like that in general, you have to do it somehow differently, you have to make sure that everything is exactly like the violent wind of freedom, the geeks are going in principle, i like it when there is a use of a passage of the text , for example, or it is from the forces, that is, who are they in the texts , there are references to which it was directly, and there are references to the works when they somehow change, re-sing the text, and i agreed, it is not very pleasant to me, that is if you want to write a song, you just take the text and just sing and everything, as far as i'm concerned, you don't need to change it, you don't need to mix it with your text somehow directly. well, like always. it's important that this is the original, so that its essence does not change. if you already fix it, you need to write it down so that do not change the meaning do not change the structure, that is, let it or the original text be as it was oksana , i have one

kharkiv this is a house of artists and writers, a famous house for you, scales and kurbas and saussure tychynahouse, and then he was in kharkiv, he was imprisoned on a cold mountain and already from there he was sent to siberia , that is, he has books that are partially written autobiographical in order to understand, and his language is very tasty, it is very good, he actually lived in kharkiv. that is why these ideas about some kind of slobozhan language are being artificially planted. moreover, i will tell you what else i have been following for a long time. when did the split in the electoral field begin, which is the language issue, did it begin after the orange revolution, when there were constant narratives that the language, the language, the russian language, about the yanukovych in general. they introduced it very strongly, but i am interested separately. i watched the polls in kharkiv. when there were social polls, which problems bother you the most? when that was the case, the language would always be in kharkiv somewhere, this language problem was somewhere in the 18th-19th place