u. s. one china policy that policy has not changed. it's guided by the taiwan relations act, 3 joint communiques, the 6 assurances we do not support, so i want independence. we were made opposed to any unilateral changes to this as quote by either side. we continue to expect the peaceful resolution of prostrate differences. arnie is less flushed out a little bit and clarify with american talks about it's one china policy. and when showing that talks about it's one showing the policy, but not talking about the same thing or the yes and no. so the one china policy is a diplomatic principle. i think that's important, kind of to be aware of the knowledge, the people's republic of china as the sole, legitimate government of china. and that is something the us does. there is no disagreement here between the 2 countries. the united states did not, however, give in to a chinese demands that it's recognized. china is southern and t over at taiwan. so there is a business like the big a fighting point. and the united states reserve the right to m

u. s. on china can overcome their difficulties. 5 palestinians have been killed and more than 90 wounded and is really raid on the west bank city of jeanine.

one china principal. this is a serious violation of u. s. commitment to maintain only on official relations with tyrone. china is strongly dissatisfied with this option that's bringing stuff on like an economist off the university, often golf and stuff on strong words. there will china match them with action, as well as basing of course denounces the trade talks between the us and taiwan. but better stand a procedure and trying to denounce us every high level government engagement with taiwanda territory that it changes its own a. but in the bigger picture, i think if we look at the us, china rivalry, any action is likely to trigger react some. the question is only how much of a reaction what we see here. and if we look at this trade deal, we will see that there is not too much substance. so if policy makers and beijing rational and i have little doubt that they are, they will see it for what it is most who symbolic. and so i don't expect much of a reaction other than a couple of words. okay, so you mentioned that this deal is locked in sym

china for russia and evening stands when it comes to the one ukraine, etc. and from the chinese perspective that china sees itself as a victim of the u. s. tech sanctions. and also it's um, excuse us, of washington to trying to contain china's rights. and i think both the rhetoric on, on, on washington sites, but also on the aging side does not leave so much room for improvement or compromise. i would say that it's likely that both sides will um, focus on. yeah. and not the really major issues, but more on non political issues. for example, the climate talks or also not quite takes control. i mean the u. s. also has a pro, a big painting the problem and a lot of the precursors that are coming from china before they reach the u. s. so i think they could, um, on those fields maybe reach some small progress. another point of interest to this trip, i do think she's in pain, will agree to meet blinking and what does it mean if he doesn't? what bed? it's really the crucial question and we don't know sofa, and it's really also says a lot how entrance, baron, things have become here. we really don't know any of this schedule until the very, very last minute. in

u. s. on for us on the china, on the the same time. yeah. select the solution there between the there is none of these because in the end the, there's nothing in the complex there we'd be, we'd be seen. and the reason a one way or another, and a dresser that we need to get is evelyn and a rock on board as well. and then be a very happy time in the middle east rush. i was in the senior research of the gulf as the by thank you so much for joining us here today. obviously by just talking to announce and china web presence, she's helping stress that the us must respect. amazing and not home is the get to the rights and the interest is comments came during a meeting with us. i feel like i'm from the bank. i'm in the chinese capital during is needs a, with the try and present 2nd to read blinking sizes that washington does not support taiwan independence. the us does not seek the new codle here to find and does not want to change the tri system of government. lincoln met with the chinese farm is the hist stress that taiwan is at the core, amazing

u. s. and more neutrality on china position is obviously reflected by european citizens themselves. and this new coal flashes with a virtue signaling meters of the block that routinely place audiology override, which is i believe we can and we must carve out our own distinct europe in approach. but also the space for us to cooperate with other partners to the starting point for this is the needs to have a shared and very clear eyed picture of the risks and the opportunities in our engagement with china. so, you know, for us, china is a partner, a competitor, and a systemic rival. and i want to make clear that our impression is that the systemic rival aspect intensifies increasingly if it wasn't just these 2 in charge, the you would spend all of its time luxury. everyone is doing business with no one they'd be like the teenager who never leaves mom and dads basement because absolutely no job could ever possibly be good enough for them. but in my cool and most europeans of obviously figured out that if you want independence, i control over your own choices and actions. then you 1st ne

and by those ones generally not calls world view of a need for independence from the u. s. and more neutrality on china position is obviously reflected by european citizens themselves. and this new paul flashes with a virtue say, going leaders of the block that routinely place audiology over pragmatism. i believe we can and we must carve out our own distinct europe in approach. but also leave space for us to cooperate with other partners to and the starting point for this is the needs to have a shared and very clear eyed picture of the risks and the opportunities in our engagement with china. so, you know, for us, china is a partner, a competitor, and a systemic rival. and i want to make clear that her impression is that the systemic rival aspect intensifies increasingly if it wasn't just these 2 in charge, the you would spend all of its time luxury. everyone is doing business with no one they be like the teenager who never leaves mom and dads basement because absolutely no job could ever possibly be good enough for them. but it's not cool. and most europeans of obviously figured out that if you want i

and profitability can buy one's actually my calls world view of a need for independence from the u. s. and more neutrality on china position is obviously reflected by european citizens themselves. and this new call flashes with a virtue signaling meters of the block that routinely twice audiology over pragmatism. i believe we can and we must carve out our own distinct european approach, but also the space for us to cooperate with other partners to the starting point. for this is the needs to have a shared and very clear eyed picture of the risks and the opportunities in our engagement with china. she knows for us, china is a partner, a competitor, and a systemic rival. and i want to make clear that her impression is that the systemic rival aspect intensifies increasingly of if it wasn't just these 2 in charge, the you would spend all of its time luxury. everyone is doing business with no one they'd be like the teenager who never leaves mom and dads basement because absolutely no job could ever possibly be good enough for them. but in my coal and most europeans of obviously figured out that if you want independence

procedures on the surface. anti corruption measures taiwan government, which maintains relations with washington through a defacto u. s embassy on the island. describe this as historic. now, as mentioned, china, which claims the territory of taiwan as its own has reacted angrily to the news. let's take a listen to what a spokes person for the foreign ministry, how to say to phone ginger china family deplores.

u. s. and more neutrality on china position is obviously reflected by european citizens themselves. and this new paul flashes on with a virtue signaling meters of the block that routinely twice audiology over pragmatism . i believe we can and we must carve out our own distinct europe in approach. but also leave space for us to cooperate with other partners too. and the starting point for this is the needs to have a shared and very clear eyed picture of the risks and the opportunities in our engagement with china. she may have, for us, china is a partner, a competitor, and a systemic rival. and i want to make clear that her impression is that the systemic rival aspect intensifies increasingly they're just always sort of tight. if it was just these 2 in charge, the you would just spend all of its time and lecturing everyone and doing business with pretty much no one. they be like the teacher who never leaves mom and dads face that because no job could possibly ever be good enough for them. but not cool . and most europeans have obviously figured out that if you want independence and c

. journalist john verbally says that washington is trying to stop. china is development at all costs. the u. s. government is focused on stopping china. how would even say they're almost desirous there was they intend to sort of ward china look was happy with taiwan or taiwan is, you know, it's, it's recognized by the global community as a part of china. but the us to go over to simply say no, no, them. and we're going to help them, we're gonna provide them with intelligence and weapons and, and so it's like, what is the n plan here? you know, the, in the, it's quite obvious. the goal is to eventually have a war with china, just like they precipitated a more between ukraine in russia. so this, the establishment in washington, the pentagon, the white house, they also desire to insight in ignite, a war in asia. good. it's all i have this feeling that they just want to have it ready just in case just in case there's somebody, there's peace in ukraine. ok, quick. let's go to asia and let's start a warranty. let's start a warrant. china, more than a 1000 people have connectivity said fine. so the house of the union minister

china coast. that's what u. s. has been doing to china, but it was on the global alex for the full defy those into connections between the us government and american media. or they come up with these, the allegations they throwed out there the see if it's going to work. they see if it will damage business. i mean, they did a lot of damage to huawei and i think, you know, once again, they might be using this for an alternative mode of here that may, we may see something, maybe a of sanctions come down on some more high tech companies from china for sure, if you look at the americans, they have a yearly budget of $300000000.00 to offset china and they use it with, you know, a lot of anti rhetoric uh pieces that continually go out. we can never, uh, you know, pinpoint who is getting a part of that fund. now that money flows into the system. how many of these media outlets are putting their hands in the pie and taking it and coming up with, you know, such, you know, slanderous allegations. it's incredible. but you know, diplomacy usually is the one that com, everything down in this situation. but unfortunately, us credit

u. s. and more neutrality on china position is obviously reflected by european citizens themselves. and this new pull flashes with a virtue signaling meters of the block that routinely place audiology over pragmatism. i believe we can and we must carve out our own distinct european approach, but also leave space for us to cooperate with other partners to. and the starting point for this is the needs to have a shared and very clear eyed picture of the risks and the opportunities in our engagement with china. so, you know, for us, china is a partner, a competitor, and a systemic rival. and i want to make clear that our impression is that the systemic rival aspect intensifies increasingly if it wasn't just these 2 in charge, the you would spend all of its time luxury. everyone is doing business with no one they'd be like the teenager who never leaves mom and dads basement because absolutely no job could ever possibly be good enough for them. but in my coal and most europeans of obviously figured out that if you want independence, i control over your own choices and actions. then you 1s

china coast. that's what u. s. has been doing to china. we're taking a broader perspective on this. what with the political analyst and blogger likes to report a phi delta. and so you will choose a generally speaking connections. regina politicians and the media have all the that they come up with these, the allegations they throwed out there the see if it's going to work. they see if it will damage business. i mean, they did a lot of damage to huawei and i think, you know, once again, they might be using this for an alternative mode of here that to me we may see something, maybe a of sanctions come down on some more high tech companies uh, from china, for sure. if you look at the americans, they have a yearly budget of $300000000.00 to offset china and they use it with, you know, a lot of a n t rhetoric uh pieces that continually go out. we can never, uh, you know, pinpoint who is getting a part of that fund. now that money flows into the system. how many of these media outlets are putting their hands in the pie and taking it and coming up with, you know, such a, you know, slandero

and even though the government says it's not the mountie, china on to u. s. block, many people see this way. but the less development give, they have some reasons for people to think like that. those claims from the us that the south africa is getting for weapons through russia and china wants to expand the brakes. doors almost spinning countries already lining up to joining the brakes mostly from little south and my president, president little here in china said that i criticize very strongly the dominance of the dollar in the world economy. so my question is, how does the u. s. government sees the brakes, does it, does it see it as a china, let's challenge to the, the, to the west of the united states. think, well 1st is a general proposition. we have long stood for the proposition that a country should be able to freely associate with other countries in any groupings that they want. something that we stand very strongly for and have defended for a long, long time. when it comes to the brakes were deeply engaged with its leading members . in fact, this wee

on those issues, maybe we could expect some slight progress. the major political issues, for example, um, what the u. s. a q, this china, of the human rights violations and since young the pro wrestling stance and also the friendship between seating thing and flooding it puts in, i mean, on those issues. um, i think both sides can not even really agree on the effects. and this really not really much room for improvement. and from the point of view of the chinese site, they basically see themselves as a victim of a chinese l. u. s. tech thinks in the state of washington as a heglum on who basically wants to contain china's rise. and as you can see, the perception is really very, very different. and that's a stock discrepancy. i don't think they will find any common ground on those major issues. ok, we only have a half a minute left so i'll be in but the $1000000.00 question, whether a shooting ping will agree to meet blinking. curious about your thoughts on that and what the implications are if the chinese leader chooses not to but just briefly, i would expect he will meet blinking because if he wouldn't, that would be

china, tesla c o u on most plans to make significant investments in india. following talks with the countries prime minister, no range remoted in new york, the move comes as u. s. companies are looking for ways to reduce their reliance on china as a manufacturing hub. in the face of tensions between washington and virginia, amazon hilton, and starbucks are among more than 40 companies that have pledge to hire thousands of refugees in europe. recruiting people fleeing from the war and ukraine and other crisis tricking countries. following russia's invasion, the number of ukraine refugees living in europe stands at almost 6000000. devastating floods, deadly heat waves, wild fires. the effects of climate change are more and more visible every year. to last year, damage from natural disasters totaled an estimated $300000000000.00. where does that money come from? especially for poor countries. many of which are particularly vulnerable to climate change. more than 50 heads of state along with representatives from the world bank and the i enough, are now meeting in paris to discuss just how to finance the climate transition and how those poor countries in particular

what ultimately for minting military conflict between china on its territory. taiwan. u. s. also knows it needs to escalate its fear mongering, an empty chinese rhetoric and the wider pacific region in case god forbid, countries like australia and the philippines actually partner with their powerhouse chinese neighbors to work for peace and regional stability. now that would really bother lloyd's bosses in washington, and his old boss is one of america's biggest weapons manufacturers rate the job. some countries have been wilfully meddling and the internal affairs of other countries and regions easily impose and unilateral sanctions and using force for collision. as well as igniting colored revolutions and proxy wars everywhere. after wreaking havoc in the region, they simply walked away, leaving the mess behind. we must never allow such things to be replicated in the asia pacific region. but don't forget, when it comes to picking sides. while publishing playing the role of peace maker, the good old usa privately involves one of its favorite geo political mattress. you're ei

on the south as anti corruption measures. taiwan government, which maintains relations with washington through a defacto u. s. embassy on the island. describe this as historic. now, as mentioned, china, which claims the territory of taiwan as its own, has reacted angrily to the news. let's take a listen to what a spokes person for the foreign ministry, how to say to sign a family deplores any form of official exchanges between countries that have diplomatic relations with a type on province of china, including negotiating and signing any agreements of silver and offers the nature of the us government insist on negotiating with a democratic progressive party authorities on the so called 21st century trade initiative and dentist on signing relevant agreements, which seriously violates the one china principal. this is a serious violation of us commitment to maintain only unofficial relations with tyrone. china is strongly dissatisfied with this action. that's bringing stuff on like an economist off the university, often golf and stuff on strong words. there will china match them with action as well? the thing of course denounces the trade talks between the us and taiwan. but the standa

on the ground. well, be, is raised by the u. s. the odds are still there flowing into the standard is you have to commit to more war crimes against people around china, where presidencies you've been cold on the u. s. a. refrain from harming by using these rights. i'm interested in total for the secretary of state, but probably in contradiction to american actions, say because it was a big thing, says the us is not seeking confrontation. the china in the u. s. stands by the commitments made by president biden, namely, the us does not seek a new cold war. it does not seem to change china system. it's alliances are not directed at china. it does not support taiwan independence and it does not exceed conflict with china. on the other side, the us has slapped sanctions on trains. companies are even pushed allies to restrict the semi conductor attack ex exports to china and even rallied some advanced economies to come to what he sees as pages, economical, colors and, and, and also signed a new trade deal with ty was. so all these actions that have promoted the badging to question the bite and ministration to sarah t president, she said to a secretary bli

on me to 85000 students during peacetime, massively scale black. isn't that the equipment and confirm is permit and try and see is constitution with russia in the u. s. u. k. china alfonze listed as guarantors, manual all out for the leaders of express. the positions on the coincides with the south african president saying the admin fee, authoration must, and corey on both sides of the escalates all tease outside of waco as the details. i think it's quite remarkable that the lodging there put in felt the need to bring this agreement to his meeting with the african leaders. in my opinion, it shows the significance. he attaches to these mediation efforts as well as rushes reputation because uh, i think what he's trying to do is to counter what's the narrative that the russian military operation in ukraine came absolutely unprovoked. and the western media and western officials liked to present it as uh, this cruel attempt to grab your print, entire true. where in fact uh, in the view of the russian president, what russia does is defending its own legitimate security concerns in india, praying. and he was very straightforward in describing russian perspective in fro

one ear. he said that um the um, the responsibility for the historic and low point between the 2 countries at nice. so within the u. s. a quote unquote wrong perception of china. and here the u. s. 2 d p reflect, otherwise, that could be any export on quote, a strategic surprises. and this is really a very concerning rhetoric, in my opinion, what would you say? fabia is the biggest source of tension between china and the us right now. well of course the list of the stupid topics is really extremely long, but that's one conflict that has the potential to escalate into an open one. that is the concept of what i want the democratic governance island south of china and yeah, facing claims territorial power over i am taiwan. and it also insist that who can resist the right to use the military if means. so basically it put a stop in invasion, it doesn't have any um deadline to do so, but i mean, that is basically on the table. and if this worst case scenario, what's happened? i mean this would lead to a deep split between a china and the west. and of costs would also lead to what's the human tragedy? so there are massive tensions in this. i know american relations.

which issues they might reach some agreement on the yeah, the list of grievances to really overshadows everything. i mean, the u. s. for example, excuse us, china of human rights violations. and since young of unfair trade practices, it's also criticized as china for the rest of the evening stands when it comes to the one you crane, etc. and from the chinese perspective, they are, china sees itself as a victim of the us tech sanctions. and also it's um, excuse us, of washington to trying to contain china's rights. and i think both the rhetoric on, on, on washington sites, but also on the aging side does not leave so much room for improvement or compromise. i would say that it's likely that both sides will um, focus on. yeah, not the really major issues, but more on non political issues. for example, the climate talks or also narcotics control. i mean the u. s. also has a pro, a big painting the problem and a lot of the precursors to accommodate you from china before they reached the us. so i think they could um, on those fields maybe reach some small progress. another point of interest to this trip. i do think she's in pain, will agree to meet

one was hawkish, no surprises. they're saying china has no room to compromise on taiwan and on relations with the u. s, he had this to say according to a read out from chinese state media quote. it's necessary to make a choice between dialogue and confrontation, co operation or conflict, and quote, blinking then wrapped up the day with his most important meeting, one that was on certain until the very last moment, face time with shooting pain, direct engagement, and sustained communication senior levels is the best way to responsibly match. i insist and ensure that competition does not deer into conflict. and i heard the same from my chinese counterparts. we both agree on the need to stabilize our relationship. well, journalist bob in questionnaire is engaging and gives us his assessment of the talks and what they can achieve given that us china relations are at such a low point. what much in terms of um diplomatic breakthroughs? no, that's really unrealistic right now. but i mean, the, the best possible outcome would be to prevent a catastrophic end, or the escalade or at least stop the escalation sp

they call the number one threats to the u. s. these, the china russian alliance us, well, us republican presidential candidate to be back around the swami has changed during an interview on a b, c, news audio. well, given a speech in new hampshire, the politician also said he would not spend another time of american money on the role that doesn't affects us interests. i think the job of the us president is to look out for american interest and what i think the number one threat to the us military is right now. our top military threat is the sign of russian alliance. i think that by fighting further in rush or by further army ukraine, we are driving russia into china's hands. another republican presidential candidate and nikki haley also spoke counts about the ukraine conflicts while claiming that russia has directions to target. poland on the bowl 6, which is something most go as actually never said, and this is bigger than ukraine. this is a more about freedom. what we heard china said they were gonna take hong kong they did it. russia said they

also citing china is increasing role in the agency. journalist and author, daniel is there says that the u. s. decision to read one anesco chose washington spear of china is growing influence and i agree that this is not how the you how unesco should be used. it should not be used by one player to bend the world to its will. the anti is really biased and so it was a red herring. i think the us, uh, the us is, is, uh usually does, whatever is real, tells us to do. uh, it takes insides political dictation from jerusalem. and so the us is not sinking very clearly now it realizes that that gesture was uh, was um, essentially harmful to its own interest and its trying to make amends. i mean, this is a sign i think a real political and economic weakness on the part of the us me. first of all the us now realizes that exit and unesco was a serious mistake. and number 2, it is continued to lose ground economically to china. so clearly the us uh, strategy is not working in this and the decision to re enter now unesco is, is essentially at un mission that that is the case. so, so i mean, so us, us foreign policy is once agai

on the verge of upgrading to 5 g networks. when it comes to this technology, the u. s. has no goalie and no players on the ice leaving china free to score into an empty net over and over again all over the world. former us attorney general bill bar once suggested during the trump administration, that the us by controlling shares in wall ways only to 5 g competitors, finland's nokia and sweden's ericsson, saying that, quote, putting our large market and financial muscle behind one or both of these firms would make it a more formidable competitor and eliminate concerns over it, staying power, and that quote, we and our closest allies certainly need to be actively considering this approach. now national security threats blown out of proportion have become a tool for frustrated hustlers looking to sabotage deals that just happened to exclude them. while way is the latest example, but we've seen that before. americans, nato ally, turkey purchased the russian, made us 400 air defense system, widely regarded as the best as class as a result of russia's prioritizing, the development of electronic warfare in the wake of the cold wa

u. s. u. k. china and france listed as guarantors. meanwhile, african leaders have expressed their positions on the conflict with the south african president saying the war must and calling on both sides to de escalate. are these acts on a boy who has the details? i think it's quite remarkable that the lodging there put in felt the need to bring this agreement to his meeting with the african leaders. in my opinion, it shows the significance. he attaches to these mediation efforts, as well as rushes reputation vickers. i think what he's trying to do is to counter west a narrative that the russian military operation in ukraine came absolutely on per bolt. and the west and media and weston officials liked to present it as a, this cruel attempt to grab your print, entire true. where in fact uh, in the view of the russian president, what russia does is defending its own legitimate security concerns and in ukraine. and he was very straightforward in describing a russian perspective in front of the african leaders. he said that the, uh, that agreement that he actually demonstrates it to them had this

one and pushed for a return to a healthy and a stable tracks. he also said that below and this and this relationship between us and china was roosted, enrolling perception that the u. s. has of train a and then he went on to make, read them on the voltage, and the bus was a full blinking and the by that administration to stop typing what he called the china threats to the us lift, unilateral sanctions against china and to the us respect, china is national unity is badging sees this on the tie, one issue to not encourage any separatism or independent living in taiwan. and he said that on this issue, china has no room for compromise. this is red line, the agent cannot see for us. now it's clear that aging blames the us side for tensions in this relationship. although it does have you at lincoln visit to page in quite positively and constructively. he also met on sunday, which one is for administer as gene gong. and he said that that meeting, which was 7 hours was constructive, although it is a difficult thing this visit because there was such a long list of disputes between these 2 sides. human rights tie, one at ukraine, trade in technology, and it seems not much grou

on the verge of upgrading to 5 g networks. when it comes to this technology, the u. s. has no goalie and no players on the ice leaving china free to score into an empty net over and over again all over the world. former us attorney general bill bar once suggested during the trump administration, that the us by controlling shares in wall ways only to 5 g competitors, finland's nokia and sweden's eric's and saying that quote, putting our large market and financial muscle behind one or both of these firms would make it a more formidable competitor and eliminate concerns over it, staying power, and that quote, we and our closest allies certainly need to be actively considering this approach. now national security threats blown out of proportion have become a tool for frustrated hustlers looking to sabotage deals, but just happen to exclude them. while way is the latest example, but we've seen that before. americans, nato ally, turkey purchased the russian, made s 400 air defense system, widely regarded as the best as class as a result of russia's prioritizing, the development of electronic warfare in the wake of the cold war.

on the verge of upgrading to 5 g networks. when it comes to this technology, the u. s. has no goalie and no players on the ice leaving china free to score into an empty net over and over again all over the world's former us attorney general bill bar once suggested during the trump administration. that the us by controlling shares in wall ways only to 5 g competitors, finland's nokia and sweden's erickson saying that, quote, putting our large market and financial muscle behind one or both of these firms would make it a more formidable competitor and eliminate concerns over it. staying power and that quote, we and our closest allies certainly need to be actively considering this approach. now, national security threats blown out of proportion have become a tool for frustrated hustlers looking to sabotage deals but just happen to exclude them. while way is the latest example, but we've seen that before, americans, nato ally, turkey purchased the russian, made s 400 air defense system. widely regarded as the best as class as a result of russia's prioritizing, the development of electronic warfare in the wake of the cold war. w

on the daily news youtube channel. let's take a look now at some of the other stories making headlines around the world. and the u. s. navy has released new video of what it cools, china's on safe, and the new, the in the taiwan strait this past weekend. the us destroy it and the full ground flowed to avoid colliding with the chinese vessel when it crossed the destroys, pulse making claims the worse away as its territory. the us and its allies say, the worse is on international as well. sorry, season china say at least 19 people were killed in a landslide in fish, one province pos of a mountain collapse near the city of lashawn, not in debris was sent, hustling towards the construction sites. all prices by a local mining company, search and rescue efforts have now ended. india's railway minister says a full c electronic signal appears to be the cause of a deadly trained car crash that killed at least 275 people. the collision last friday involved to passenger trains on the freight train. hundreds of people are still being treated in hospital in australia, a woman child for 2 decades over the death of her 4 children as being pardoned kathleen megan full, big was fried. o

a bunch of also a head hair on out as sarah white, china has accused the u. s. presidents of provocation and the violating is political dignity. i'm buying the best is one of the was biggest helps with ship recycling. looks of business is taking a toll on what the the, brought to you by visit capital. hi again. good to see you here is your weather updated in a minute 15 beginning in asia. i gotta tell you, the air quality has taken a nose dive in both karachi and before i think we can expect much of the same on thursday. so let's move on to india right now. remnants leftovers of what was tropical cycling. bit par joy finally start to peter out. what is the east of that country where we are getting pelted with rain? so 2nd, be har. what spin goal now? pushing into on trip or dash, anywhere in the zone. we could see some flooding, also the risk of seeing some flooding in the southern philippines, the brown, mid now island, the western side of the island. anyway, severe flood advisories in play here. and doubts with rain is our fund rains wobble between the gang s