policy over in decades. well, more fundamentally, absolutely, the u. s. has enabled a failed is regularly strategy a terrible one. so i do completely agree that i that the u. s. policy in the middle east is failing terribly. it's leading to wider war, even if the us wants to restrain that it's not restraining the why, the war. why? because at the crux of this conflict is an on the south political problem with israel and palestine that absolutely needs to be solved. and all of the anti rainy and dimensions have, but a very large source in the palestine is real conflict. after all, there is no intrinsic reason why iran would be the great the enemy of the united states, even with all the history, the us has a lot to apologize for to arrive and starting in 1953 with the over throw the democratic government and the installation of a police state after all. so there could have been a reproach, month between the us and iran. i've always wanted that. i talked to you, i should have signed the j c p a way and implemented it. and of course i that it was subverted by

u. s. policy. that's what the white house set off to the coal between president biden and prime minister netanyahu. but at the same time, us officials told the washington post that the bike and administration approved a transfer of thousands more weapons to israel on the same day. that is really a strict think of the killed. it'd be $78.00, which is now the warning that we heard yesterday coming out of washington was quite staunch and quite unprecedented. but the humanitarian crisis and also has been reading since the war began. so in your opinion, one took the bite and administration so long there is a question that many not only here in the us are asking themselves after october, 7th of last year. more than 168 workers were killed in gauze. the only in that year in those a few weeks, the total is larger than all 8 worker that's worldwide. and every year since 1997 according to age, work, a database. but it is this killing of the west and aid workers that appears to mocking inflection point full b

u. s. as in courage, right? long range strikes within russia. this has been spoken about in policy papers. it's been spoken about by u. s. military experts. the secretary of defense lloyd austin, has said, the goal of the us is too weak in russia and to inflict on them a strategic defeat. they don't care about american weapons being used in russia. they are just fine with that. that isn't acceptable escalation at this point because of the u. s. policy officials of said there, russia has no red line reading. we will not pay any attention. the red lines, which is absolutely taught a nuclear power, that not only as you said has more nuclear weapons in the us. what actually has far more modern nuclear weapons and carriers like hypersonic missiles and, and sar math and liked them the united states. but this is on the ask, this is the escal atory latter that we're on and the u. s. has no sign that they even desire and exit ramp. i think this aid was always going to be approved. and it's really just domestic, petty part is in wrangling that has held it up over a border security issue as long as it

u. s. as in courage, right? long range strikes within russia. this has been spoken about in policy papers. it's been spoken about by u. s. military experts. the secretary of defense lloyd austin, has said, the goal of the us is too weak in russia and to inflict on them a strategic defeat. they don't care about american weapons being used in russia. they are just fine with that. that isn't acceptable escalation at this point because of the u. s. policy officials of said there, russia has no red line reading. we will not pay any attention. the red lines, which is absolutely taught a nuclear power, that not only as you said has more nuclear weapons in the us. what actually has far more modern nuclear weapons and carriers like hypersonic missiles and sar mites and liked them the united states. but this is on the ask, this is the school, a tory latter that we're on. and the us has no sign that they even desire and exit ramp. i think this aid was always going to be approved and it's really just domestic, petty part is in wrangling that has held it up over a border security issue as long as it has

u. s. policy community. and i believe in the us government, that the best option for peace and stability in the taiwan street is for the us and its allies and partners to help balance china's military power. and particularly it's course of power over time, one through these types of military 8 packages. so i think all of those issues will certainly be on the table. and i think china will give a very strong opinions against increasing us taiwan defense cooperation. and thank you so much for sharing your insights with us today that as well re daniels from the asian society policy institute. my pleasure. thank you. hey, ukraine also top. the agenda talks in berlin between the german chancellor or la schultz. and the british prime minister refused to knock. it is the next 1st visit to germany since he took office 18 months ago. the 2 leaders also discussed plans to develop remote control artillery. due to these chief political editor, mckayla customer has this update on the tocs. this is really overseas through

u. s. policy officials of said there, russia has no red line reading. we will not pay any attention. the red lines, which is absolutely taught a nuclear power, that not only as you said has more nuclear weapons in the us. what actually has far more modern nuclear weapons and carriers like hypersonic missiles and sar mites and like them the united states. but this is on the ask, this is the school, a tory latter that we're on. and the us has no sign that they even desire and exit ramp. i think this aid was always going to be approved. it's really just domestic petty part is in wrangling that has held it up over a border security issue as long as it has. i've got to get to you. i know i see you over there, you're ready to go. we're going to give me 5 2nd. give me a t's on what you want to say. he doesn't have the, he doesn't have the, the, the, the ordinance to do anything internally. so he's going to try to aim at infrastructure within russia is south side. we'll keep it at that and you'll be able to amplify that when we come back, michael maloof as well as mike's on boat right here.

u. s. policy of recent months. so especially since israel began its wall in gaza and this is something that clearly indicates a shift in the us position. the possible, the possibility or the threat of making a israel conditional if it does not increase the protection of civilians during its war on garza, my kind of ultra sierra washington. let's go live now to really challenge who joins us from occupied east joyce. and so really, israel says it will open up a crossing in the north for aid. but what difference will that make considering the obstacles? we've seen the crossings in the south? well look, i mean it's indicative really, isn't it, of the in fluids, the leverage to the united states kind of applied to is ralph's when it chooses to do so, because this decision from netanyahu tie him just hours off to the phone calls with the president biden he then went into a security cabinet meeting where the decision was taken. now the statements that came off to that security cabinet meeting says that these route will al

u. s. policy is imposing a basically trying to contain china's economic rise. so there's a lot of conflict there. and then in terms of political issues, you have to taiwan, issue a, china has strongly criticized weapons sales of the u. s. to taiwan. then, of course the tensions in the south china sea and then the middle east will be debated. i think in this issue of both have a different positions, both sides, but at least there will be a common ground. both sides want to prevent further escalation, but the most crucial and the most important topic will be the one ukraine. and for this, i mean, the u. s. has basically accused china of exporting a lot of to use products to russia and exporting a lot of machine to will import. i mean, that is really crucial for russia and put a lot of importing to build up. it's a mishap program, so in directly china is keeping poor things warm machinery going and there is a strong accusation. and i think this will be the main topic of the top of the talks that's probably in touch my reporting from beijing here in germany. severa

misplace to make sure that american foreign policy supports is real unconditionally and it is wildly successful. truly impressive, how good the lobby is. getting a u. s. foreign policy makers to support israel, hook, line, and sinker. never the optimism that it's, you know, is the invincibility of apax that are, of invincibility breaking down. and i think that's a little too strong. i think it's a road in somewhat of what the future looks like for sure. it's hard to say. let me make 2 points there. first of all, the lobby now has to operate out of the open, and it has to engage what i call smash male politics. before we wrote the article in the book, the lobby could operate behind closed doors and for any interest group, the ideal situation is to operate behind closed doors and not out in the open. but when you're out in the open, like the lobby is now when you're engaged in smash mouth politics, it's going to cause you all sorts of problems that's pointing out. ready one, please, number 2, that israel's behavior has gotten more outrages over time. and a good manifestation at this point is what's happening in regards to today. and the situation is no

u. s. policy, the ukraine during the obama administration. and now the buy in ministration. and one thing on the previously side of the party is, is that it's really unfortunate and thing but well publicized that the us government was trying to influence the president for a shank. come to a point on americans as the prime minister of ukraine. there's recorded conversations between then vice president biden and portia cohen, it's hard to imagine, you know, more stark interference. and that's why america and the internal affairs of a foreign country in the us government attempting to influence the selection of its prime minister. why i call soul peace pulse and the west seen as copy to nation to president put in, asked these to notes. let's not forget, you know, present body. it's family, you know, to the corrupt, the corruption of the binding family and up on, or by the receiving all the money from the crane. i mean, there's really sort of a distaste and part of america that, that president biden is supporting ukraine. you know, because of this family tied up but, but we, we

u. s. green policy coach s. as in margaret elizabeth sais, the candidate to west, to is the extent to which political oppression has developed in the us as well. i think it really highlights the hypocrisy that the democratic party and indeed the republican party as well in body. they will tell us that they want peace for everyone and then fund genocide. they will tell us that, oh, we are trying to uphold the rule of law in the world. and yet allow lawless behavior and, and anti democratic behavior to take place right under their nose is not actively supporting it. when you see people like dr. signed on, these protests lines being arrested. you're, you're really seeing the, the actual behind the mask face of the democratic party. they're, they're just a fascist, a tool to oppress the people. the truth of the matter is when you look around these approaches, people are not being violent towards the jewish students or jewish faculty in these institutions. that's not what it's occurring. it's in fact, the opposite. a

u. s. policy of recent months. so especially since israel began its wall in gaza. and this is something that clearly indicates a shift in the us position. the possible, the possibility or the threat of making a to israel conditional if it does not increase the protection of civilians during its war on garza, my kind of ultra sierra washington as sarah has obtained exclusive footage from northern gauze of showing is rarely soldiers opening fire on the several palestinians attempting to collect aid the video to pick so distressing scene, but posting and civilian and the carrying a just deliberately shot multiple times by the soldiers. warning. now the images in this report all distressing. we had a baby because killed during the i'm going to carry an air drop. that's the tragic fee to repel as pinion men collecting $8.00 in the city of shoes, a in north eastern gaza. on march 9th, an airplane drops, a packages over the gaza strip. but soon it becomes evident that it doesn't come without risk. the packages lands new the boldest fence in northern garza. exclusive foota

u. s. policy, the ukraine during the obama administration, and now the buy in ministration. and one thing i repeatedly set a r t is, is that it's really unfortunate in thing, but well, publicised that the us government was trying to influence the president for a shank. go to appoint an american uh as the prime minister of ukraine. there's reported conversations between men, vice president biden, and portia cohen, it's hard to imagine, you know, more stark interference. and i, by america, in the internal affairs of a foreign country. and the us government attempting to influence the selection of its prime minister. why have calls for peace talks in the west seen as copy to nation to president put in as the see the notes, let's not forget, you know, present biden's family you know, to the corrupt or the corruption of the binding family and up on or by the receiving all the money from the crane. i mean, there's really sort of a distaste and part of america that, that president biden is supporting your grain. you know, because of this family time. but, but we do have one guy her

u. s. policy with respect to garza will be determined by our assessment of israel's immediate action on the steps while whitehouse corresponding, kimberly, how get tons more on that phone call of what the united states is looking for now, is for israel to implement a series of concrete specific and measurable steps, and they're not looking for this to be done over a sort of a lengthy timeline. what john kirby said is they're looking for this in a matter of hours if not days. so they're looking for it to be done quickly. and if it's not done quickly, what the national security council spokesperson said is that for the 1st time in a long time, the united states is looking at policy change. and that's was really significant here because for a long time we heard from the united states that israel had a right to defend itself. that they were not considering any sort of conditionality to be more than 4000000000 that is supplied in annual military aid to israel. and well, that is still ongoing for the 1s

u. s. policy, the ukraine during the obama administration. and now the buyers in ministration. and one thing on the easily side of the party is, is that it's really an unfortunate thing, but well publicized this. the us government was trying to influence the president for a shall go to a point in america. as the prime minister of ukraine is recorded conversations between them, vice president biden and for chicago, and it's hard to imagine no more starts interference america. journal services for audrey, them, us government, attempting to influence the selection of its prime minister. why i call soul peace pulse in the west scene as happy to nathan to president put in as the seating notes . let's not forget, you know, president biden's family go to the crop, took the corruption of the binding family and up on her bike and receiving all the money from the crate. i mean, there's really sort of a distaste and part of america that, that president binding the supporting ukraine. you know, because of this family time. but, but we, we do have one guy. i'm like, i'm talking about the fo

u. s. policy, the ukraine during the obama administration, and now the binding ministration. and one thing i repeatedly side of the r t is, is that it's really unfortunate in thing, but well publicised that the us government was trying to influence the president portia and go to appoint an american uh, as the prime minister of ukraine. there's reported conversations between men, vice president biden, and porsha and cohen. it's hard to imagine, you know, more stark interference by america in the internal service of a foreign country. and the us government attempting to influence the selection of its prime minister. now a recent report from the institute claim, the key as a recent fee is adjusted russian. this information campaign, what do you make from those claims? i don't think that the america will 1st of all, but i don't think that that's russian. this information, the real different, this is this information we have here. tonight, states is a whole no rush or hoax where the democrats primarily including, you know, now secretary lincoln had been falsely accused of the russ

u. s. policy of recent months. so especially since israel began its wall in gaza and this is something that clearly indicates a shift in the us position. the possible, the possibility or the threat of making a to israel conditional if it does not increase the protection of civilians during its war on garza, my kind of ultra sierra washington. so when i speak to sol takahashi, about all this is a professor of human rights and peace studies at osaka university. and he's also a former deputy head of office of the un high commissioner for human rights in occupied palestine, in joining us from tokyo professor. thank you so much for your time. do you believe that the us is really prepared to make changes to his policy towards israel? if these are these don't change at contacting? gosh. well, i mean, i very much hope so. i mean, the up till now the whole narrative, the biden is getting tough on that and yahoo! and he's really, you know, calling for action. up till now it's really just been smoke and mirrors, seemingly dir

also and co author of books including how states think the rationality of foreign policy and the israel lobby and u. s. foreign policy. a. thank you so much for the as much. i'm a for coming on nato at 75. i suppose we better just quickly start off with what you thought. when you heard the news, the diplomatic buildings in damascus had been destroyed. presumably with american weapons, the act of war suddenly was not condemned by you and security council members. britain, france, and the united states. you know, i was actually quite disappointed, but not surprised at all. the western countries didn't condemn the israel east for attacking the rainy and embassy in damascus. if any other country had done that to any other countries, embassy uh, the united states and its allies would surely condemn that country. i mean, can you imagine if the russians hit an embassy in any country around the world of the united states, and that's how i would have gone ballistic. but with this rule, as always, it's a different story. the israelis can do pretty much anything they want. and get away with it, and it just doesn

also an co author of books including how states think of the rationality of foreign policy and the israel lobby and u. s. foreign policy. a thank you so much for of as much time as our coming on nato at uh 75. i suppose we better just quickly start off with what you thoughts. uh, when you uh, the news, the diplomatic buildings in damascus had been destroyed. presumably with american weapons of that act of war suddenly was not condemned by you and security council members. britain, france, and the united states. yeah, i was actually quite disappointed, but not surprised at all. the western countries didn't condemn the israel east for attacking the rainy and embassy in damascus. if any other country had done that to any other countries, embassy uh, the united states and its allies would surely condemn that country. i mean, can you imagine if the russians hit an embassy in any country around the world of the united states, and that's how i would have gone ballistic. but with this rule, as always, it's a different story. the israelis can do pretty much anything they want. and get away with it, and it just d

also and co author of books including how states think the rationality of foreign policy and the israel lobby and u. s. foreign policy. to thank you so much for of as much time as are coming on nato at 75. i suppose we better just quickly start you off with what you thought. when you heard the news, the diplomatic buildings in damascus had been destroyed. presumably, with american weapons, the act of war uh, suddenly was not condemned by un security council members of britain, france, and the united states. you know, i was actually quite disappointed, but not surprised at all. the western countries didn't condemn the israel east for attacking the rainy and embassy and damascus. if any other country had done that to any other countries, embassy, uh, the united states and its allies would surely condemn that country. i mean, can you imagine if the russians hit an embassy in any country around the world of the united states, and that's how i would have gone ballistic. but with this rule, as always, it's a different story. the israelis can do pretty much anything they want. and get away with it, and it ju

u. s. policy of recent months. so especially since israel began its wall in gaza and this is something that clearly indicates a shift in the us position. the possible, the possibility or the threat of making a to israel conditional if it does not increase the protection of civilians during its war on garza, my kind of ultra sierra washington. the o g 0 has obtained exclusive facilities from northern guys. a showing is ready soldiers opening fire on several times, simians attempting to collect aid the video to fix a distressing scene where palestinian civilian carrying aid is deliberately shot multiple times by the soldiers wanting the images in the head of a babies report. honda civic, killed during how many terry an air drop. that's the tragic fee to the public opinion men collecting $8.00 in the city officers a northeastern gauze. on march 9th, a new plane drops a packages over the gaza strip, but soon it becomes evident that it doesn't come without risk. the packages lens knew the boldest fence in northern garza

u. s. foreign policy and how american taxpayer money ought to be spent independent us and it's come today. don says that instead of using the cash for developing the u. s. washington prefers to spend its own global conflict. i think there's probably more going on then me see, i don't know if it's related to the lumen blow out of the trans atlantic financial system. i find it frankly embarrassing that the congress would spend so much time and effort, debating policies which are going to inflame the world, which don't help the united states and have consequences which i would find horrific. i would not want on my conscience if i were a member of the elected body, so i'm not sure it probably has to do with election cycles and to ah, primaries and all kinds of factors that are not obvious. it's not going to change the situation. now you might ask, how could a $174000000000.00 affect the lives of the american people? could we not repair our railroads? uh, could we not do something about water management power management, there would, would have some real used, or if we wanted to do real recons

also and co author of books including how states think of the rationality of foreign policy and the israel lobby and u. s. foreign policy. thank.

u. s. foreign policy, and you called the united states a care agent. putting aside the moral considerations. what do you seeing on the downside of a such a policy for its author is when the united states or the united states was trying to prevent the rest of the world from creating an alternative. the united states is trying to make its own rules. that's what it those the rules space order, but that's completely logs with the international law and the united nations and the rules. okay. international law again. so if the united states can cite tape, tape, training case pass is prevent other countries from getting together. at last the end crating. an alternative, most of the chaos is around the countries where the united states was trying to start a colored revolution. and in order to have a regime change to bring a friendlier, more, a pro, your west client oligarchy, into being linked argentina or brazil, or germany. that's the ideal go to a country who they want leaders of another country to be essentially representing us interests, not the interest

u. s. foreign policy hall, john bolton, he's pushing for those very facilities to be hit. he alluded to, and elijah nuclear weapons program that to around has repeatedly denied pursuing. i think among many talk is israel should consider this is the opportunity to destroy your ends, nuclear weapons program. and i help president biden is not trying to dissuade prime minister netanyahu from doing that. well, as is rid of ways it's response to last weekend's retaliatory large scale drone and rocket assault children has warned against further escalation is really prime minister insistence forces will hit back when and how they deem fit across in the us. some lawmakers of cold on washington to help israel bomb around, but the opposition is not officially shared as yet by the whitehouse. discuss this is with geo political analyst has our dean has good to see you. so we have the i a opposing israel's potential bombing of around the stapler sites, people like john both in the calling for exactly that. which voice is when i hear those binding, the drums of war are those seeking de e

u. s. foreign policy hawk john bolton, he's pushing for those very facilities to be had. he alluded to an a legit nuclear weapons program. that's around house, repeatedly denied pursuit. i think among many targets these real should consider, this is the opportunity to destroy iran's nuclear weapons program. and i help president biden is not trying to dissuade prime minister netanyahu from doing that . well, uh is rid of ways it's response to last weekend's retaliatory large scale drone and rocket. a sold by around town has warned against further escalation the it's really prime minister insist his forces will hit buck when and how they deem fit across in the us. some lawmakers i've called on washington to help israel palm around, but that position is not sufficiently shared by the white house. but let's take this further with that, i guess on a strategic offers expert side mohammed ali. you're most welcome to the program. not following to drums, retaliation for the deadly bombing of bits. consulate in syria on april 1st is realize no setting it sites on the run itself. co

u. s. foreign policy and how american taxpayer money ought to be spent. but we got reaction to the vote in congress from political level this on the filmmakers shown still, he sees it's disturbing to see so much us taxpayers money. going to prop up and ukraine's war effort, especially after presidente lensky, who's term expires next month. recently refused to hold a democratic election. there's the notion, there's the argument that can be made that because you create isn't the time of, of crisis that they don't need to hold the elections. um, you know, that they have to, they're basically they're trying to, there's a narrative that ukraine is fighting for its survival. and so in these times there's no, they don't have the, the, the ability to really held a fair election because of this crisis. that's the mainstream argument of the us perspective. i can't imagine that democracy is really concerned about it for, for why the aid needs to happen and why we have to support the, you know, the ukrainian side, let's say of the war. a believe that the interest of

u. s. foreign policy and how american taxpayer money ought to be spent their lives now to grandson, depend on us. it said it's candidate to discuss this the, the many things we're doing is on the program. it's very nice to see you today. so then we know the previous version of the us phone, a bill was stuck in congress for months. why do you think these are a separate bills with posts so quickly just days of to being pitched on capital hill? you know, i think that's a very good question and i think there's probably more going on than meets the eye . i don't know if it's related to the looming blow out of the trans atlantic financial system. i find it frankly embarrassing that the congress would spend. so much time and effort, debating policies which are going to inflame the world, which don't help the united states and have consequences which i would find horrific. i would not want on my conscience if i were a member of the elected body. so i'm not sure it probably has to do with election cycles and i have primaries and all kinds of factors that are not obvious. the you claim the age bill

u. s. foreign policy and how american taxpayer money ought to be spent. though all the democrats voted for ukraine, a. they also faced divisions as some of the law makers voted against aids israel and expressed anger over the bill. all of us have seen the tragedy of guys that we've seen how prime minister netanyahu, whose government has use american weapons to kill indiscriminately to force families over 25000 women and children dead. tens of thousands of missiles and bombs levied on innocent civilians. and when we see it, we have to decide what we're going to do about it. are we going to participate in that carnage or not? as i choose not to prime minister netanyahu has been reckless. his actions have not led to the release of the remaining hostages. he's ignored the police of a family of hostages. he's ignored the please of the president of the united states . he's ignored his own people now who doesn't support the united states position of a 2 state solution for peace. he doesn't respect urges now to invade rafa. he disputes with the us in a groups ups

u. s. foreign policy. and many of them have been asking for years and years. uh how i could still be there with these open minded views. many of my colleagues perhaps would have stood up, but i think they're intimidated in here in this country. we're not so out about palestinian history palestinians a try try are treated as 2nd class citizens as sub humans. palestinians don't have access to m s nbc and fox news in the new york. busy most of the new york times, it's really in a symmetrical more on the palestinian people. so something has been confused. there is have been a quiet, these are my colleagues with the students overwhelmingly have been in support. and next wednesday, we're going to have a, a big protest at john jay college of criminal justice, so that can be reinstated. and this will also go to the course of course. now we have seen a number of people being fired or suspended from their jobs over proof policies and post on private social media accounts. what is your interpretation of this trend? especially in a country like the united states as well.