u. s. foreign policy, u. s. foreign policy wants to support israel, and israel is, is very happy to have these conversations shut down because they are pro palestine . naomi mentioned the objectionable content is the reason that, that these things are being shut down. and that's exactly right. so in a conversation between sector blinking and romney day, they said out loud about tech talk just being shut down because there's too much boston and content on it. and so we're, we're del, we're left with this situation where the social media and, and the dissemination of news as we see it is being controlled by government that, that is, and is being done deliberately on our ability to, to speak on the issue is being shut down, so to fix that, we need to remove those powers. dobbs social media companies have to limit our conversations and that governments have to, to control those narratives. and that will take a lot of work and many more discussions like this one, just print some good ideas for now. paul signed me u

u. s. policy is read out with any kind of criticism. that's a big mistake. and i do believe that the strategy the european union has been um, following in the recent um, one to 1000 days is a phase one is a failed one. because europe, we come to a lot in the last, almost 3 years. and i do believe that instead of globalizing the conflict, the right strategy would have been to localize it. and to do everything in order to resolve it, to make peace. instead of, you know, uh, pouring oil on the fire, which has been the case. you know, we are the only country in your or your opinion, which has not delivered to the funds to we are the only country natal. almost the only one which speaks openly about the red lines which must be kept serious. and we are the ones to speak openly about with our assessment that nato is a defense alliance and not an ethics alliance. in the upcoming days, we will have many debates. i guess in europe because we have, we're assuming a serial coming. nato mean serial coming. so that'd be possibly bates and we are praying really very hard th

u. s. policy analyst, based in washington dc. welcome. let's turn to mosque role in just a moment for 1st i'd really like to set the stakes of what's happening here. can you explain what happens in the event of a u. s. government shut down? absolutely. so the last major shut down rehab was in the last trump presidency. i personally was dc resident in a previous obama presidency shut down. and it really, truly shuts down all government workers that are non essential. i stay home and not work for home. just truly do not work is you're essentially still have to go on the office. we are probably not being paid. no, it is being paid. they will pay them back when the funding is re established with interest. so this is decision that costs the government more money as well. there's a lot of little things that people don't think about. national parks are all shut down in the city of dcs. budget is reliant on the, on funding from congress trashes and picked up in the nation's capital. lots of kind of down the street. these things are funded, especi

u. s. policies happened to just so neatly align with the pen to goods . the button to russian lies documenting russian rule crimes. rooting out common slides. syrian emergency task force director malls mustafah added that a desire to aid ukraine was another factor prompting the offensive with the aim of striking a blow against russia a mutual enemy. so it could be a coincidence of policies, so didn't trust. so maybe they have some classified information on pennsylvania avenue city of focuses are all through just a block away from the white house. so convenient that again. if it looks like a duck, swim is like a duck and quacks like a duck. then it's probably a government asset. we're really acting as an extension of the united states government. we've become a resource. then that's one of his policy advisors. tony, be dash of it. he's been a full team, his as a parks head of communications. and now was in a storm, chainsaw in a spring time, which ones pools of as well for american academics who knows, maybe the next one will include the now occupied golan

u. s. foreign policy and also the foreign policy agendas of european countries. yeah. whether or not they're going to live sanctions. also questions about the sanctions on h t. s. gonna be very important when we look at the prospects for, for an investment in the country is coffee, or we appreciate you taking the time to talk with us a lot of big questions. a lot of unanswered questions about the future of syria tonight. thank you. thank you. well, the fall of the solvers, e means and millions of syrians who fled during the civil war. now have the chance to return to their home land within 3000000 across the border into neighboring turkey. that means turkish and service has been speaking to syrians in his temple, who were both optimistic and anxious about the prospect of going home. for always swati, assuming an engineer, it is just the best moment ever. play out of them is o dreams have come to think god best sealed it for 15 years we have been waiting for this day. you took or so we have been very patient. uh yes, it was very difficult. uh we suffered undertake. we be

u. s. foreign policy committee is well known for his strong position against sending money to ukraine. right in math says washington's european allies should handle the issue because the conflict is on their continents. another official against funding for ukraine, this cache patel trump nominee for f. b i, director, he has publicly questioned how he ever spent a $1000000000.00 provided by washington. and i've asked this congress to be to investigate. where has this money gone? the american people are oh, that answer because of our money. our taxes are now and there's a lot of really good reason to be concerned because, you know, you, the ukraine was known as a, you know, place for of corruption a place for money laundering. yeah. it's not like we set a $1000000000.00 as if that was even a small number to begin with. right? we sent a 100 times that to one country. i don't know how this congress is allowed to get away with it. we just can't have full faith and trust by giving a lead or a $100000000000.00. and having him say, i'm not telling you where the money went. the tell previously

u. s. foreign policy is that it often doesn't matter who's in the white house. the us has taken up 2 legs to its foreign policy. they see themselves as a country of dominance as a strong country, as, as it were, the aba tall. oh, he's of whose democratic and who's not the use the economic and military minds to influence how the world is structured. and so whether it's a bite and presidency in obama presidency or a trump presidency, it still comes with those kind of values that intrinsic to foreign to us foreign policy. and since the end of the cold war, i want to say one final thing on this job. i didn't saw this trip as a necessary revenge. i. people are saying, but he's, you know, he won the last a, the democrats lost the election and he humiliates and we had to withdraw in july at the very last minute. why does he bought a building on the state to visit? precisely because of what you mentioned when we started this, this conversation, the crucial will be to court all and also i think that's true. biden's administration would have calculated that this quarter w

u. s. foreign policy and also the foreign policy agendas of european countries. you know, whether or not they're going to live sanctions. also questions about the sanctions on h t. s. going to be very important when we look at the prospects for foreign investment in the country is coffee, or we appreciate you taking the time to talk with us a lot of the questions, a lot of unanswered questions about the future of syria tonight. thank you. thank you. as the fall of the assault review means that millions of syrians who flood during the civil war now have the chance to return to their homeland before the dramatic events of the weekend. within 13000000 people were displaced both inside syria and in neighboring countries, such as the turkey turkey, by the way, has the highest number of syrian refugees with around 3100000 registered there. and that's followed by 11 on jordan and iraq. here in europe and germany is home to the biggest population of syrians outside of the middle east. within 700000 are currently registered as refugees or asylum seekers. dw, as turkish ser

u. s. foreign policy. and on the other hand, it's clear that this conflict is on winnable for ukraine. europe is starting to awaken to this back then. yes, trump has been saying it for a long time and so have other political actors. so there may be a, a shift in strategy as far as a foreign policy that, that does lead to maybe cutting losses when it comes to the grain. i think everything has to do with internal is rarely politics. i think that there is a certain faction of this really politics that looks at expansion is um, specifically the expansion of settlement as a way to alleviate internal pressures when it comes to economic dissatisfaction. and so on and so on, that's being felt by people that live in, uh, israel. so i think that the strategy more or less is to use war as a pressure valve to offset some of that. and, and basically, um, to open up new spaces for a settlement, the expansion of the the settlement project. can i turn attention to to syria, very much a developing situation there still. i'

u. s. foreign policy, and how states think the rationality of foreign policy is the best, the best time. a thank so much for coming back on going underground. i guess 1st your reaction the victory of the united states and is rarely neutralizing palestine facilitates a techie and bathing in the north israel. as i said from the south, russia losing its military bases, presumably we can talk more about the china, the end of its belt road as far as its ports in the west to yeah, i mean there's so many implications of what's going on as a result of the collapse of syria is. ready hard to know where to start. i mean it's quite clear that the losers in this conflict were rand. uh, russia and has. ready ha, uh there's no question that for ran, this is a big blow. ready in the sense that syria was an ally and important now i and very importantly, syria was a conduit for a rainy and weapons to get to has the law inside of lab and on. and for the time being at least that conduit has been shut down. i think the russians also last because they were supporting syria and of course has the last for the

u. s. foreign policy and how states think.

policy, which is leading israel. it's the other way around. it is ro is now in control of u. s. foreign policy. and cnn is just another one of those tools in the box of the state department. martin j douglas edited her gabby dot org. thank you so much for your inside here. now with another story that shape the week, the put inside moscow should have started special military operation in ukraine area as you have and it's west and sponsors for us to send those. and the way we should have understood earlier when the opponents are not going to implement the means, convenience that they are simply misleading us. later western leaders admitted this, and they also publicly stated that they were only going to achieve one goal to gain time, to rearm the ukrainian armed forces so that they could prepare for war. and if they gave you clean the opportunity to prepare for future military action, then they were counting on it to begin to while we understood this. but we should have acted more decisively and promptly. we should have prepared for this and chosen the right moment to begin, and not to wait for t

u. s. foreign policy is that it often doesn't matter who's in the white house. the us have particular she loves to it's foreign policy. they see themselves as a country of, of dominance as a strong country, as, as it were, the orbits how he's of who's democratic and who's not the use the economic and military mind to influence how the world is structured. and so with that, it's a bite and presidency in obama presidency or a trump presidency. it still comes with those kind of values that intrinsic to foreign to us foreign policy. and since the end of the cold war, i want to see one final thing on this job. i didn't saw this trip as a necessary revenge. i. people are saying, but he's, you know, he's the one he lost. the democrats lost the election and he should really 18 we had to withdraw in july at the very last minute. why does he bought a building on the state to visit? precisely because of what you mentioned when we started this, this conversation, the crucial will be to court all and also i think that's true. biden's administration would have calculated that

u. s. foreign policy, and how states think the rationality of foreign policy is the best. the best time a thank so much for coming back on going underground. i guess. first your reaction the victory of the united states and is rarely neutralizing palestine facilitates a turkey and bathing in the north israel. as i said from the south, russia losing its military bases, presumably we can talk more about the china, the end of its belt road as far as its ports in the west to yeah, i mean is so many implications of what's going on as a result of the collapse of syria is. ready hard to know where to start. i mean it's quite clear that the losers in this conflict were a ran russia and has. ready ha, uh there's no question it for ran. this is a big blow. ready in the sense that syria was an ally and empower. busy now i, and very importantly, siri was a conduit for a rainy and weapons to get to has the law inside of lab and on. and for the time being at least that conduit has been shut down. i think the russians also lost because they were supporting syria and of course has the las

u. s. foreign policy and how states think the rationality of foreign policy provides about china. thanks so much for coming back on going underground. i guess 1st your reaction to the victory of the united states and these rarely neutralizing velo science facilitates a turkey and bathing in the north israel. as i said from the south, russia losing its military bases. presumably we could talk more about the china, the end of its belt road as far as its ports in the west to yeah, i mean there's so many implications of what's going on as a result of the collapse of syria that. ready hard to know where to start. i mean it's quite clear that the losers in this conflict were a ran russia and has. ready ha, uh there's no question that for ran, this is a big blow. ready in the sense that syria was an ally and important now i and very importantly, syria was a conduit for a rainy and weapons to get to has the law inside of lab and on. and for the time being at least that conduit has been shut down. i think the russians also lost because they were supporting syria and of course has the last

u. s. foreign policy. and so on the other hand, it's clear that this conflict is unwinnable for you. great. europe is starting to awaken to this fact. and yes, trump has been saying it for a long time, and so have other political actors. so there may be a, a shift in strategy as far as a foreign policy that, that does lead to maybe cutting losses when it comes to ukraine. can i move inside with into, into gas that because if there is a loss of weapon, re and, and money going to key, if you've got trump honest administration, big supporters of best, real hon, my thought impact, the middle east conflict. well, i think that the, that is where things are the most unpredictable right? actually right now i think that trump has made it very clear that he's committed to unconditionally supporting israel in this conflict. but on the other hand, it's very important to pay attention to other developments. there is starting to be a discourse even within the republican party and, and republican party politicians and congressmen that is pushing back against this unconditional support for israel. a

u. s. foreign policy chief is, is pressing washington to continue it's 8, and that more is actually the path for the us to remain a super power. how do you expect to try to react to that? the trump team, i guess, in general, especially because trump round on this platform of anti war, well, it's going to be a challenge with the drugs ministration. we've seen over the course of the last month. it's already been a month since the election, which is a mind blowing. but over the course of last month, we've seen quite a bit done by the, by the administration, as well as actors in europe to try to lock us in, in to this conflict in strength and the algorithm toward war. so it'll be a challenge with the jump administration to actually promote peace and find a way for you to create, i think that's uh there's going to be internal conflicts and then the trump administration itself, of course, we've seen do sales people appointed or been potential cabinet appoint appointments . we have always been strongly in favor of war uh, including more with russia. people like marco rubio and others who have

u. s. foreign policy in the region or israel's had so many or domination and expansion in the region from young men to somalia to so then to libya, to syria, toyota, and 11 on in various ways. it is uncanny how this is a i don't want to say, orchestrated but orchestrated is definitely part of the game to remove any obstacles to on most complete domination of, of us in the region. the lay of the land and the future is now going to be very open for any is really us and friends. a donation without any response it on, as you will see, will also be not necessary be next. and the sort of the simple sense, but will be also under so much pressure to not continue this. and is this, this access that we have seen gumble whether or not the components of it and this is axes all or your, or my, or anybody else has a cup of tea. and let's talk about turkey for mimic is turkey split, a very important role in all of this. they back the key arm arm to groups who over through it said, why this turkey make this choice? what's turkey's motivation in supporting these groups? yeah, i mean, i, again, i was in tu

u. s. foreign policy in a pro israel direction. but other, say it's the other way around at the us as much to gain from having are kind of stones out. and then it's a strategic motivation rather than all right in the lobby issue. what's your perspective? i mean i, i respect john, he was a former colleague, is a friend and i think is right about the lobby, but only up to a certain extent. it's really clear that for a lot of american military officials and strategist, they see 1st of all their interventions, they believe in force. and israel is a tool in that arsenal it during the cold war, it helped united states to beat down. so if you had proxies defeating countries on by the soviet union, and then in the cold war, you know, that, that black and white, you know, 0 sum a game that was an advantage to the united states. and that was, that was the anchor of the, of the strategic aspect of the american is really relationship. and united states is at odds with iran. and so is real as seen as a potential ally in that. now, i would argue

u. s. foreign policy and how states think the rationality of foreign policy prevents about trying to thank so much for coming back on going underground. i guess 1st your reaction, the victory of the united states and is rarely neutralizing palestine facilitates a turkey and bathing in the north israel. as i said from the south, russia losing its military bases. presumably we can talk more about the china, the end of its belt road as far as its ports in the west. yeah, i mean there's so many implications of what's going on as a result of the collapse of syria that it's hard to know where to start. i mean, it's quite clear that the losers in this conflict were.

u. s. house foreign policy committee. brian moss is well known for his categorical position, a gang sending money to grab, he says washington's a european allies to the handle that issue instead, because a concert is on the continent. another official against funding for u. k is tash puts in a, he's trouble pick for f b i run. so it's spoken publicly about a need to investigate how key of a spent a $1000000000.00 provided by washington. i've asked this congress to be to investigate. whereas this money gone, the american people are oh, that answer because it's our money. our taxes are now and there's a lot of really good reason to be concerned because, you know, you, the ukraine was known as a, you know, place for of corruption a place for money laundering. yeah. it's not like we set a $1000000000.00 as if that was even a small number to begin with. right? we sent a 100 times that to one country. i don't know how this congress is allowed to get away with it. we just can't have full faith and trust by giving a leader a $100