u.s. constitution but this isn't the first time the u.s. has brought up concerns about war ways of companies as we just said it goes back several years and it isn't just the united states it's all of the countries known as the five eyes that's australia canada new zealand the u.k. and the u.s. they've all expressed concerns about huawei technology particularly in the area of five g. . that that that this may be used. to to to violate privacy and abuse. spying and so on they add a right to it so worry about that so well because this concerns are legitimate firstly the alliance of the united states care of the australia new zealand and the united kingdom and of course it is the so-called five zero eight kind of digital intelligence network which is a bit secret but is also is the open secret. but there's no wonder that all these countries are you know have a common interest in monitoring a kind of the digital security but then you would look at those countries even the united kingdom has already said that some of the risks are not are managea

u.s. constitution has also been disregarded. i pray this answer will be a causation for change. why or more black males treated more aggressively nationwide, and this seems to be the case for a very long time. let it be that you clearly see through spirit, it is because the world has always, to this moment, hated even now, the master carpenter with the will and hair who also spoke clearly about lawyers. the bar association and service to papal law has long usurped by ku all three branches of government, and ongoing treasonous truth. the opposed -- they oppose assistance to the homeless, otherwise they'd be suing every church for false advertising, love one another, do unto one another. perhaps the reason for the high incidence of aggression towards hispanics might be because every fourth one of them is named jesus. so it seems that religious leaders and deceivers would rather rule in help then served in heaven. the churches could easily take in all the homeless, but instead, they would rather see the camps filled up. they're over 4 million people in the camps, but before obama s

u.s. constitution guarantees free speech, federal courts define and enforce it. the department of justice can weigh in. conservatives don't like it when judges try to write laws and they should not like it when legislators were agencies try to rewrite the constitution. part of the statement from lamar alexander, former education secretary, now chair of the education committee in the senate. ♪ ♪ announcer 1: we are waiting for president trump at the gathering in the east room of the white house for an executive order on free speech on college campuses, expected to get underway shortly. treating earlier after 52 years, it is time for the united states to recognize israel's sovereignty over the golan heights. you may hear more about that. prime minister benjamin netanyahu at the white house on monday and tuesday. ♪ ♪ >> ladies and gentlemen, the president of the united states. ♪

u.s. constitution to designate the time, place, and manner of their elections. i know the author of this legislation said yesterday that h.r. 1 is simply implementing the best practices of states, but that's federalizing our election system. no matter how nicely you you phrase it. congress should partner with the states who understand the unique needs of their own residents and provide support to increase voter registration and improve election security. instead of federally mandating what this bill does, which is a one-size-fits-all approach. there is a limited role for the federal government to play in elections. when pat herbs of discrimination have occurred and when we will continue address those patterns, we can can do it in a bipartisan way through the voting rights act. can i cannot stress enough that congress should absolutely be in favor of increasing access to the polls. we can cannot do that without adding the necessary checks and balances to ensure that these accesses are protected. we should allow states to maintain their own voter rolls, to help th

u.s. constitution and the only way we can legally hold people is if we have a warrant..." change in local policy, law enforcement will continue to be caught in the middle trying to make a distinction between providing protection to otherwise law-abiding undocumented residents and violent criminals like carlos carranza who is one again locked up here in county jail. in san jose, rob fladboe, kron 4 news. (robin) california is a sanctuary state, but the a-c-l-u recently discovered local police departments are giving u-s immigration and customs enforcement officials access to people's personal data... and it's all happening through license plates. the a-c-l-u believes ice is using the inforamtion to deport undocumented immigrants. more than 80 local law enforcement agencies nationwide are said to be involved. they discovered... ice agents nationwide are able to track more than five- billion drivers. they added that granting ice access to this information violates the california values act. <"our next step is to call on t to conduct this audit of california law enforcement age

u.s. constitution because it impedes on first amendment rights. particularly the press. you have an interesting tension at play. mr. sexton: the united states is a little late to the game in protecting state secrets. there is a legitimate need, a national security apparatus classifying and protecting information particularly in a period of wartime. when do we see this change happening? is it the first world war or when yourld war type have the espionage act? is that the key bit of the story? tell us a little bit about the origins and let's get into the 20th century to the post cold war period. prof. mistry: you mentioned the espionage act. that is crucial. >> that is the world war i era espionage act. -- sexton: prof. mistry: the world war i era espionage act. enacted in 1917. while the u.s. government does not have a secrets act, it has an ad hoc system rooted in the espionage act. one of the contributors to the project in the book that we are publishing, there is a wonderful essay on the birth of the espionage act and its evolution. it is a world war i era legislation

u.s. context remains somewhat different because of those constitutional questions. mr. sexton: one more question. >> this is related to the last question. you talked about our lack of a state secrets act, and you alluded to the prosecution of whistleblowers and how the espionage act is used to throw the book at whistleblowers. i was wondering if you could expand on that. mr. mistry: in the united states, prosecution through the espionage act revolves around the handling of the information and the dissemination of that, the passing of the information to people who do not have the authority to view that. they do not have the required permit to look at classified secret or top secret information. which is why espionage and the espionage act remain important, because it is rooted in the idea of the dangerous sharing of information which could undermine public security. the difference with the official secrets act is that in a country like the u.k., the information itself is protected. so if there is threat of disclosure, that information is quarantined essentially, and it c

u.s. constitution. on may 17, 1954, the courts handed down a momentous decision.n the field of public education, the doctrine of separate but equal has no place. separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. the naacp had been instrumental in winning the most significant civil rights victory since the end of slavery. ♪ >> as far as the impact of the decision brown versus the board of education of topeka, kansas, had, it simply meant that the system under which thousands and thousands of negroes had been educated prior to that time was dumped out the window. could no law be passed that my children could go to this school and, if i were white, they go to that school. >> the 1954 decision spurred the naacp and other activist groups to challenge segregation. marches and sit inns led to the -- marches and sit ins led to the arrest of money demonstrators. -- many demonstrators. roy wilkins became the executive director of the naacp in 1955. it was clear there was much work yet to do. to gain true equality, not only the laws, but the attitude and tradition of s

u.s. constitution that we protected. how do you reconcile these things in which i do come down a >> is a great question because the top. it's tough because although in the united states we have taken one answer which is we have a very expansive understanding of spree entrance free-speech we protect individuals ability to spell hateful things up until the crust alike. that they're exhorting lawbreaking. and that is pretty expansionist in terms of protecting free speech. other countries do what we do and think were not. and they explosively repudiate what we do. it's not as though a choice that we have made as americans as the correct choice under all circumstances. where do i come down, i think that that is a really good example where speech can be understood in tension with equality. because a lot of the things that lead to deep forms of inequality rely on the horrible sort of speech that is allowed to be expressed. that that is how these ideas are communicated and i find their way into the minds and behavior of people.

u.s. constitution. >> think about it.r wears a hijab according to koran tells women to cover so they won't get molested. is her adherence to this islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to sharia law which in itself is anti-thet cthetical t united states constitution? >> this was at the end of a week of controversy for representative omar following the suggestion that jewish money is behind congressional support for israel. but fox says pirro went too far. >> the network says we strongly condemn jeanine pirro's comments about representative ilhan omar. they do not regleblgts those fle net work. and pirro did not quite apologize but said i did not call representative omar unameric unamerican. i requested the question to start a debate. >>> the controversy around owe cast a cloud over democrats all week. a resolution against hate started out focusing narrowly on domest ant anti-semitism but was gradually broadened. >>> isis is on its last legs. the final push to wipe out the terror group's last enclave in syria is unde

u.s. constitution and the only way we can legally hold people is if we have a warrant..." (vicki) california is a sanctuary state, but the a-c-l-u recently discovered local police departments are giving u-s immigration and customs enforcement officials access to your personal data - through your license plates. kron 4's sanaz tahernia spoke to the a-c-l-u to find out what's going on.going on. out what's c-l-u to find spoke to the a-sanaz tahernia warrant..." (vicki) california is a sanctuary state, but the a-c-l-u recently discovered local police departments are giving u-s immigration and customs enforcement officials access to your personal data - through your license plates. kron 4's sanaz tahernia spoke to the a-c-l-u to find out what's going on. the a-c-l-u recently uncovered information that shows local police departments across the country have been sharing their residents' personal information with the u-s immigration and customs enforcement... and the aclu believes ice is using the inforamtion to deport undocumented immigrants."we discovered in the documents that o

u.s. constitution but it's highly controversial to in two thousand and seventeen nearly forty thousand people in the u.s. were killed by guns two thirds of them suicides. there are around one hundred twenty one firearms for every one hundred americans forty three percent of u.s. households own a gun including many families with children. this is not a toy it's a small caliber rifle designed especially for children nine year old connor is using it for training his sister cheyanne is already a great shot. damn near single father loves guns is right it was my first wage was on my fifth birthday and sheer on line first day i got this one. i first met the family last year at the annual meeting of the national rifle association the children have been n.r.a. members since birth i filmed her sitting on my lap when she was five shooting one of my twenty two rifle just to get her acclimated to the cereal and what it would do afraid of it and then quizzing her on the safety rules. these days cheyenne has sponsors and is on the women's competitive shooting circuit . she's fourteen years old similar in ag

u.s. constitution specifies that no person shall be elected to what position more than twice?is is a tough one. [laughter] >> it shouldn't be. >> i think i'm gonna go with a, president of the united states. >> final? >> final answer. >> of course, that's right for $500! [applause] good start. >> $500! >> [chuckles] let's double it. let's go for 1,000. >> okay. >> the trademarked term "march madness" specifically refers to what? >> another tough one. but i think i'm gonna go with d. >> final? >> final answer. >> it's all about hoops. march madness, of course! >> yes, that $1,000. [applause] >> that brings us to our third question, worth $2,000. which of these occupations does not typically involve the donning of a robe? >> i'm gonna go with b, forest ranger, final answer. >> 'cause they would just look weird, of course. that's right! that's 2,000. [applause] moving on up. $3,000 question already. >> okay. >> named after a legendary game show host, what mathematical paradox involves deciding whether or not to trade for what's behind one of three doors? >> oh, wow. bob eubanks di

u.s. constitution and the only way we can legally hold people is if we have a warrant..."unless the courts rule otherwise or there is a change in local policy, law enforcement will continue to be caught in the middle trying to make a distinction between providing protection to otherwise law-abiding undocumented residents and violent criminals like carlos carranza who is one again locked up here in county jail. in san jose, rob fladboe, kron 4 news. (terisa)(terisa) police departments are sharing your personal data with u-s immigration and customs enforcement officials. that's what the a-c-l-u recently found across the country and here in california. the personal data comes from d-m-v database like your license plate. the a-c-l-u believes ice is using the information to deport undocumented immigrants. it says -- among other things -- granting ice access to this information violates the california values act which prevents police from sharing personal data to enforce immigration laws. "our next step is to call on the california state auditer to conduct this audit of californ

u.s. constitution. >> federal courts for many, many years across the country have ruled that holding people beyond their release time violates the fourth amendment to the united states constitution. >> reporter: county council james williams says he could have been held if i.c.e. had issued a warrant for his arrest or inquired about his release date, but they didn't do either. >> when we get a warrant we are actually able to directly hand the person off and have i.c.e. take custody. a phone call or other notification, often doesn't work. they don't show up. it is not an effective practice if you actually want to have the person taken into custody. you need a warrant. >> reporter: in yet another twist the san jose police department confirmed yesterday that the suspect in the case had been arrested and released by the san jose police department, back into the community, after a drug offense. it wasn't until later he was connected by dna to the murder of bambi larson. the policy in san jose, for the police department, is not to inquire about immigration status on people they arrest off the str

u.s. constitution, not to protect the president or my party. have a constitutional obligation to pursue these matters and the gravity that they represent. let's take what we are right now. ofhink the media is guilty defining that my -- this is overage. summaryd on a four page of what we know is a 300 page plus report. the idea that there is no collusion, what he concluded is that there is no criminal conspiracy to collude actively with the russians. that is not saying that there was no collusion. we know that there was contact involving wikileaks. we know that there was a meeting at the trump tower with russian operatives. we know that there were at least 17 campaign or administration officials with contact with russia and they lied about it. reason heforget the was appointed was because the attorney general at the time did not tell the truth in his confirmation hearing as attorney general about his own russian contact. therefore, he was required by doj procedures to recuse himself from the russia investigation. i think there is a lot more to le

u.s. constitution lays out procedures for trying and removing a president who is guilty of congressman michael patrick clonic and says a democrat controlled inquiry will. the democrats knowing that it's not going to be much of a report are now trying to build their own campaign and continue the activity of them all or in their own clumsy imperfect way and their goal is to take this president down and make sure that he is in no way possibly real acted next year and so they will do their best to keep this alive if more was keeping his or his and is his investigation somehow alive they would be doing this because the need for this investigation would be would be vitiated by a bible or doing his but now motors done and he's apparently not going to report much of anything this has the democrats furious so they're going to build an investigation that they control that they run that they can control the outcome of and what surprised price it will have the outcome that they wanted to have and no one will believe it. and it's made a self-proclaimed interim president. and it's way to self proclaimed int

u.s. constitution lays out procedures for trying and removing a president who is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors the idea is to put a check and balance on the executive branch so that it is not above the law however it seems that as of late invest. ations and impeachment have turned into just another play in the never ending political football game he looked up at r.t. new york the white house has already reacted to the new democrats effort calling it a disgraceful and abusive investigation into tired fall through a location former u.s. republican congressman michael patrick flanagan things that the democrats need a fresh inquiry because the special counsel has failed. the democrats knowing that it's not going to be much of a report are now trying to build their own campaign and continue the to video from all or in their own clumsy imperfect way and their goal is to take this president down and make sure that he is in no way possibly real active next year and so they will do their best to keep this alive if more was keeping his or his a his summer his investigation somehow alive the

u.s. constitution. and taking it to supreme court knowing big help i don't know if sits on the supreme court does that mean the president can just easily eeg nor distribute from congress and count on the court to rule in his favor. i don't think the president will ignore this rebuke anyway because although it is a symbolic rebuke from what we've seen from this bipartisan rebuke at the same time i think we do know that the president keeps something which is like a list of those who are with him and those who are against him and the president has made this very clear in this policy this is not just about whether he is the republican senators necessarily support just his border policies this is also about whether they side with him and in the weeks leading up to this vote we already heard from some republican heavyweight senators for example like susan collins like marco rubio like mitt romney who said that they were against this measure because it did infringe on that crucial separation of powers but we a

u.s. constitution lays out procedures for trying and removing a president who is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors the idea is to put a check and balance on the executive branch so that it is not above the law however it seems that as of one political football game a little up and r.t. new york. own trump is prone to the new efforts to impeach him harassment of innocent people who also pointed out there is no evidence of collusion tallies with russia when u.s. republican congressman michael patrick on the can believe that a democrat controlled inquiry will backfire. the democrats knowing that it's not going to be much of a report are now trying to build their own campaigning continue the activity of them all are in their own clumsy imperfect way and their goal is to take this president down and make sure that he is in no way possibly real acted next year and so they will do their best to keep this alive if more was keeping his or his a his summer his investigation somehow alive they would be doing this because the need for this investigation would be would be vitiated by a bible or do

u.s. constitution that i swore an oath to support and defend. he said this declaration is a dangerous precedent. at least eight republicans have said they will vote in favor of the resolution. and you can follow the debate ve on our companion network, c-span 2. sunday night on "after words" georgetown university professor examines russia's foreign policy. sheer book "putin's world," interviewed by nevada congresswoman titus. >> are you more optimistic if we find common ground like arms control, that we can be a good partner with russia? >> putin's popularity has fallen by 40 points and public opinion data in russia shows the majority of russians want change. they want a better economic situation and many of those people understand that having this antagonistic relationship with the west is not the way to go if they want greater economic growth. >> 9:00 eastern on c-span 2. sunday on "que and a." >> i didn't think we would be talking about this war in afghanistan the way it has been escalated, the way it has escalated every year. the countless li

u.s. constitution so what i observe no in france especially to try to put some censorship even on the. on the social media with facebook or twitter and so. i'm going to be concerned about that but i agree that there is a new a social media was started working in france for instance to contact many of for. actually end on this note here because it's at in moscow out athens and in london and thanks to our viewers for watching us here on r.t. see you next time and remember cross talk rules. to get a. sound . which is the wave. we did. i never saw any contact with. any kind of went back to where they were back here again fifteen feet apart at this point and. the money is dead right so the money. money is being along from bank to bank to bank bank bank which is a measure of economic health is dead and it the money printing continues to increase some sort of asking the question why is the money not getting into the economy they're printing more of it. is a tense situation in venezuela is still all over the news the problem in venezuela is not that socialism has been poorly implemented but th

u.s. constitution and the only way we can legally hold pee have a warrant...">( darya ) unless the courts policy ... law enforcement will have to make the distinction between providing protection to law-abiding undocumented residents and violent criminals. ( darya ) the american civil liberties union recently discovered local police departments are giving ice access to people's personal data.license plates. the a-c-l-u believes ice is using the information to deport undocumented immigrants. more than 80 local law enforcement agencies nationwide are said to be involved. the a-c-l-u says granting ice access to this information violates the california values act which prevents police from sharing personal data to enforce immigration laws. <"our next step is to call on the california state auditer to conduct this audit of california law enforcement agencies to ensure they're in compliance with the state laws that would prohibit sharing this information with ice.">( darya ) one of the police departments involved is union city police. kron 4 reached out to them for a statement, but they have no

u.s. constitution's first amendment got involved this is not just miles as own free speech rights but the rights of the public to get this unique perspective of what it was like to be a soldier on the ground in afghanistan. home right that perspective includes attempts to save a fellow marine mortally wounded in combat his mother permitted the footage to be used in the film we do want to have an honest discussion about the war that doesn't you know hero worship and kind of sugarcoat the whole experience goes he estimates twenty fellow marines died during his eight month tour of duty. he himself was wounded all before coming to that yes there's no discussion of the tens of thousands of afghan civilians killed in the war but the filmmaker hopes to give american viewers a better understanding of what they and the u.s. military are up against kristen salumi al jazeera new york. hello again elizabeth problem in doha with the headlines on al-jazeera voting has ended after turkey's municipal elections and president. party is fighting to hold on to major cities as the country faces recession thes

u.s. constitution so what i observe no in france especially to try to put some censorship even on the. on the social media with facebook or twitter and so. i'm going to be concerned about that but i agree that there is a new a social media was started working in france france and the french contact many of for actually you know actually going to end on this note here because it's actually energize people like ourselves here that's all the time we have here many thanks to my guests here in moscow out athens and in london and thanks to our viewers for watching us here r.t. see you next time and remember rostock rules. breaks it count down. we did kind of one for the one. happened on three swung. i never saw any contact with. any kind of back to where they were back here again fifteen feet apart at this point and. the money is dead right so the money velocity with measured money is being along from bank to bank to bank bank bank which is a measure of economic health is dead and that the money printing continues to increase some sort of asking the question why is the money not getting into